Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Evaluating the evidence for models of life course socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review

BMC Public Health20055:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-5-7

Received: 08 July 2004

Accepted: 20 January 2005

Published: 20 January 2005

Abstract

Background

A relatively consistent body of research supports an inverse graded relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). More recently, researchers have proposed various life course SES hypotheses, which posit that the combination, accumulation, and/or interactions of different environments and experiences throughout life can affect adult risk of CVD. Different life course designs have been utilized to examine the impact of SES throughout the life course. This systematic review describes the four most common life course hypotheses, categorizes the studies that have examined the associations between life course SES and CVD according to their life course design, discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the different designs, and summarizes the studies' findings.

Methods

This research reviewed 49 observational studies in the biomedical literature that included socioeconomic measures at a time other than adulthood as independent variables, and assessed subclinical CHD, incident CVD morbidity and/or mortality, and/or the prevalence of traditional CVD risk factors as their outcomes. Studies were categorized into four groups based upon life course design and analytic approach. The study authors' conclusions and statistical tests were considered in summarizing study results.

Results

Study results suggest that low SES throughout the life course modestly impacts CVD risk factors and CVD risk. Specifically, studies reviewed provided moderate support for the role of low early-life SES and elevated levels of CVD risk factors and CVD morbidity and mortality, little support for a unique influence of social mobility on CVD, and consistent support for the detrimental impact of the accumulation of negative SES experiences/conditions across the life course on CVD risk.

Conclusions

While the basic life course SES study designs have various methodologic and conceptual limitations, they provide an important approach from which to examine the influence of social factors on CVD development. Some limitations may be addressed through the analysis of study cohorts followed from childhood, the evaluation of CVD risk factors in early and middle adulthood, and the use of multiple SES measures and multiple life course analysis approaches in each life course study.

Background

The adult behavioral lifestyle theory of cardiovascular disease (CVD) describes an adult's lifestyle choices and levels of physiologic risk factors as the primary predictors of CVD risk [13]. This approach is supported by a relatively consistent literature demonstrating an inverse, graded relationship between SES and CVD [412]. There is also a growing literature that focuses upon the influence of SES at different points in life on adult CVD risk.

A force behind the interest in the impact of early-life conditions on adult health is the fetal origins (Barker) hypothesis. This hypothesis, which has been met with considerable support and criticism, posits that poor nutrition during fetal and early infant development ("critical periods") can increase risks for adult disease. While the dominance of the adult lifestyle model of chronic disease development may not be threatened by evidence for the fetal origins hypothesis, a reconsideration of the primary importance of adult behaviors and risk factors is underway.

A life course approach to chronic disease proposes that the combination, accumulation, and/or interaction of the social environments and biological insults experienced throughout the life course impact current and future events, environments, and health conditions and thus ultimately impact adult health [13, 14]. Various interrelated theories have been put forward, [1423] and many study designs have been utilized to examine the impact of life course SES [13, 17, 19, 2330].

This review describes the major groups of conceptual life course SES models, and then categorizes and summarizes studies that examine the associations between life course SES and CVD risk. Studies are grouped by the basic life course design utilized; summaries include methodologic critiques and descriptions of certain key studies. Evidence supporting each conceptual life course model is considered and future research directions are discussed.

Life course SES conceptual models

The different extant hypotheses on the influence of life course SES on CVD can be grouped into four broad conceptual models: the latent effects, pathway, social mobility, and cumulative life course models. Most studies reviewed tested the influence of life course SES on CVD outcomes via the operation of one or more of these models.

The latent effects model

The "latent effects" life course conceptual model hypothesizes that adverse early life experiences increase the risk of CVD in later life, independent of intervening SES, lifestyle, or traditional CVD risk factors. Power & Hertzman (1997) describe a latent effects model wherein certain early life events may have strong independent effects on adult health [14]. Kuh and Ben-Schlomo (1997) propose the related concept of biological chains of risk, wherein prenatal and early life socioeconomic factors affect biologic resources and directly influence adult health [13]. A recent formulation suggests the operation of biological or developmental influences during early "sensitive periods" which permanently impact the organism [28].

The pathway model

In this life course model, early life events and environments influence later life experiences, opportunities, and health risk factors. Hertzman et al. (2001) propose a developmental process linking early-life psychosocial environments with adult health risk via pathway effects, wherein early experiences place an individual onto a certain "life trajectory," eventually impacting adult health [28]. Similarly, Kuh et al. (1997) use the concept of "social chains of risk," whereby early events influence later life experiences, thus impacting adult disease risk [20]. Blane (1999) describes an "ongoing social process" wherein a continuity of social circumstances are linked and may create a "chain of disadvantage [31]."

While a pathway life course model is intuitively appealing, its operation is difficult to test empirically. Life course studies typically collect information on participants at two or three time points, which does not permit the continuous, lifelong operation of pathway effects to be observed.

The social mobility model

Social mobility theories all hypothesize that SES mobility across the life course impacts adult health, although the different proposed theories posit different health effects. Forsdahl (1978) hypothesized that deprivation in early life followed by later affluence combine to produce elevated CHD mortality risk, partly via elevation of adult cholesterol levels [32]. Others proposed that natural "health selection" occurs, wherein less healthy individuals tend to have downward social mobility and healthier individuals tend to be upwardly mobile [30, 33]. In contrast, the "health constraint" hypothesis contends that socially mobile individuals possess health characteristics of both the SES group they leave and the one they join, so that social mobility minimizes the health differences between SES groups [15, 34].

The cumulative model

A cumulative SES life course model hypothesizes that psychosocial and physiological experiences and environments during early and later life accumulate to influence adult disease risk. Davey-Smith et al. (2002) suggest that if factors operating at different life stages are combined, large differences in CVD risk will be observed [35]. Kuh et al. (1997) describe an individual's biological resources accumulated over the life course as their 'health capital' [20], which describes and influences current and future health. The "accumulation of risk" model described by Ben-Schlomo and Kuh (2002) proposes that the impacts of different life course events accumulate but do not interact [26].

Methods

We conducted a MEDLINE search using keywords and MeSH terms related to SES, life course, early life, longitudinal studies, CVD and CVD risk factors. References identified and books on life course research were also examined for study citations. Inclusion criteria were: (1) publication date between January 1966 and July 2003; (2) SES or related measures as independent variables; (3) outcomes of subclinical CHD, CVD morbidity and/or mortality, or traditional CVD risk factors. Behavioral risk factors were limited to: adult diet, physical activity, alcohol consumption, and smoking. Physiological outcomes were: measures of obesity, blood pressure, intima-media thickness, fibrinogen, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and lung function. Ecologic studies, studies primarily evaluating the fetal origins hypothesis, and studies only examining the impact of birth weight, height, upper leg length, patterns of growth, household crowding, geographic mobility or numbers of siblings were excluded. Forty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria.

Quantitative summarization of the study findings is problematic due to varied study populations, SES measures and CVD outcomes evaluated, time points evaluated, and designs utilized. Moreover, a tally approach to summarizing across studies based on statistical significance can be misleading due to the different strengths, weaknesses, power and biases of each study (p. 671) [36]. Summaries therefore consist primarily of qualitative information on the types and directions of associations observed and the findings reported by authors. Although we avoid focusing on statistical significance, in most studies the authors' decision to declare a positive finding was tied to a null-hypothesis significance test using a p-value of < 0.05.

Categorization of life course studies by life course study design

Studies were categorized by their life course study design(s) and study question(s) into four groups: early SES → outcome, early SES → risk factor, social trajectory, and cumulative SES studies. Several studies appear in multiple categories, as they employed more than one of these designs. Table 1 describes the research questions and hypotheses typically considered by each design.
Table 1

Life course study designs: hypotheses tested and typical study questions posed

Life course study design

Typical chronological analysis set-up used in study design

Typical study question

Early SES → Outcome

Early-life SES variable(s) used to predict CVD (e.g., CHD, stroke). Adjusted for later-life events, behaviors, risk factor levels to determine "direct" effect of early life SES.

Is there a significant independent effect of early-life (childhood) SES on the adult risk of CVD after adjusting for later-life SES and risk factors?

Early SES → Risk Factor

Early-life SES variable(s) used to predict adult CVD risk factors levels.

How does early-life SES affect later-life levels of behavioral and physiological CVD risk factors?

Social Trajectory

Inter- or intragenerational movement from one SES level to another (i.e., Low SES to High SES) used to predict adult CVD risk factors levels or CVD outcomes.

How does social mobility from one point to another during the life course affect the risk of CVD?

Cumulative SES

A summary variable indicating number of negative SES events/environments over the life course used to predict adult CVD risk factors levels or CVD outcomes.

How does the accumulated number of negative SES-related exposures across the life course influence the risk of CVD?

CHD = Coronary heart disease.

Results

Early SES → outcome life course studies: overview

These studies examined the effect of childhood and/or adolescent SES on risk of adult CVD (e.g., incident myocardial infarction (MI), CVD death, incident/fatal stroke) [3756] and typically tested the latent effects hypothesis (i.e., examining the "direct" effect of early-life SES on adult CVD risk). They commonly measured the independent effect of childhood SES by statistically adjusting for later-life SES and CVD risk factors in regression models.

Early SES → outcome studies: summary of results

Table 2 lists these 20 studies according to CVD outcome utilized (see Additional file 1 for greater detail on these studies). All 19 studies conducting unadjusted or age-adjusted analyses reported a point estimate consistent with an inverse association between early-life SES and risk of one or more of the adult cardiovascular outcomes. Authors of 14 studies concluded that their findings supported some or all of their study hypotheses [39, 4145], 47[4955]. Fourteen of 16 studies adjusting for adult SES and/or CVD risk factors reported some indication of an inverse association; however, in only five did the authors suggest that their results support the hypothesis of an inverse association between early life SES and CVD.
Table 2

Summary of SES – CVD life course studies using an early SES → outcome design

1st Author, year & reference number

Study name

Early life SES measures

Variables adjusted for other than age

Acute/ Survived MI, CVD

  

Burr 1980 [49]

South Wales hospital cohort

Father's occup (RG, 3 groups), father unemployed (> 1 year), family size

Current SES

Notkola 1985 [40]

East-West Study

5-level index: father's occup & farm size

Current SES, CVD RF's

Coggon 1990 [37]

Stoke-on-Trent & Newcastle study

Father's occup (RG, 5 groups), height, sibling death

Current SES, smoking

Hasle 1990 [48]

Danish worker's union study

8 variables (yes/no) on parent's occup, health, household, residence, edu, illness

None

Kaplan 1990 [43]

Kuopio Study

Factor analysis of edu, occup, farm, farm size, perceived wealth

CVD RF's

Lundberg 1993 [51]

Swedish population cohort study

4 yes/no variables: economic hardship, large family, broken family, dissension

Current SES, gender

Gliksman 1995 [39]

Nurses' Health Study

Father's occup at 16 years

Current SES, CVD RF's

Lamont 2000 [41]

Newcastle 1,000 Families Cohort

Birth: father's occup; 5 & 10 years: parent's occup, housing, # of adverse life events

Current SES, CVD RF's

Marmot 2001 [46]

Whitehall II Study

Childhood: father's occup (RG, 4 groups), age at leaving edu

Labor force entry: Occup

Current & child SES

Wamala 2001 [45]

Stockholm Study

Early-life SES disadvantage index (0–3) of 3 variables: large family, born last, low edu

Current SES, CVD RF's

Stroke

  

Gliksman 1995 [39]

Nurses' Health Study

Father's occup (4 groups) at 16 years

Current SES, CVD RF's

Coggon 1990 [37]

Stoke-on-Trent & Newcastle study

Father's occup (RG, 5 groups), height, sibling death

Current SES, smoking

Davey Smith 1998 [44]

Collaborative Study

Father's occup (RG, 4 groups), also mnl vs. non-mnl

Current SES, CVD RF's

Frankel 1999 [54]

Boyd Orr Cohort

Father's occup (RG, 5 groups)

Townsend area deprivation score

Dedman 2001 [56]

Boyd Orr Cohort

Persons/room, tap water (yes/no), toilet type, ventilation, cleanliness (3 levels each)

Childhood SES, area deprivation score

CHD Mortality

  

Notkola 1985 [40]

East-West Study

5-level index using father's occup & farm size

Current SES, CVD RF's

Lynch 1994 [38]

Kuopio Study

SES index (3 groups), by parents' edu, occup, farm, perceived wealth

Current SES

Vagero 1994 [50]

Uppsala Birth Cohort Study

Occup of head of household (mnl, non-mnl, unemployed)

Current SES

Gliksman 1995 [39]

Nurses' Health Study

Father's occup (4 groups) at 16 years

Current SES, CVD RF's

Davey Smith 1998 [44]

Collaborative Study

Father's occup (RG, 4 groups), also divided into mnl vs. non-mnl

Current SES, CVD RF's, area deprivation

Hart 1998 [42]

Collaborative Study

Early SES: father's occup; Labor force entry: Occup; At screening: occup

None

Frankel 1999 [54]

Boyd Orr Cohort

Father's occup (RG, 5 groups)

Townsend area deprivation score

Davey Smith 2001 [47]

Glasgow Alumni Cohort

Father's social class, (RG, 5 groups)

CVD RF's

Dedman 2001 [56]

Boyd Orr Cohort

Persons/room, tap water (yes/no), toilet type, ventilation, cleanliness (3 levels each)

Childhood SES, Townsend area deprivation score

Davey Smith 2002 [52]

Collaborative Study

Father's occup (mnl/non-mnl)

Current SES, CVD RF's

Claussen 2003 [53]

Oslo Mortality Study

Index of housing conditions items

Current SES

Osler 2003 [55]

Project Metropolit

Father's social class (3 groups) by occup

Birth weight, IQ at age 12

CHD = Coronary heart disease; Edu = Education; IHD = Ischemic heart disease; MI = Myocardial infarction; Mnl = Manual occupational class; Non-mnl = Non-manual occupational class; Occup = Occupation; RF = Risk factor; RG = Registrar General's social class categories.

For studies with CHD and stroke outcomes limited to early-life SES (i.e., not controlling for adult SES or other risk factors) almost all included a point estimate consistent with an inverse association. However, in adjusted analyses, authors of only one study with a CHD-related outcome and fewer than half the studies of CVD mortality reported inverse adjusted associations. Thus, the existence of a "direct effect" of early-life SES after adjusting for adult risk factors was not strongly supported.

Early SES → outcome studies: methodologic issues

To prevent statistical confounding by adult conditions, most studies employed statistical models that adjusted the association between childhood SES and adult CVD risk for adult SES and behavioral/ physiological CVD risk factors. This may be an over-adjustment, as certain risk factors (e.g., BMI, smoking) are part of the pathways through which low childhood SES may influence CVD risk. Little information is usually available on how participants' early-life SES may have influenced levels of adult CVD risk factors. Additionally, if unknown variables influence both the distribution of a CVD risk factor adjusted for and the distribution of the outcome measure, then adjustment will result in an incorrect partitioning of the total effect of early-life SES into "direct" and "indirect" components [5759]. Thus, early SES → outcome studies which seek to determine the "direct," adjusted effect of early-life SES on CVD risk may incorrectly estimate this effect [60], leading to questions about the accuracy of such estimates.

Some studies examined and qualitatively compared the effects of adjustment for different classes of CVD risk factors. Gliksman et al. (1995), for example, analyzed the association between father's occupational class and adult CVD in a series of models adjusting for different classes of potential mediators or confounders. This allowed for a more complete description of the impact of adult environment, behavior, and physiologic risk factors versus the latent impact of early life socioeconomic factors [39]. Studies utilizing more than one life course study design ("mixed-design studies") take a related approach and are considered in the Discussion section.

Early SES → risk factor studies: overview

Life course studies in the early SES → risk factor group evaluated the influence of early- and/or mid-life SES or living conditions on later-life behavioral or physiologic CVD risk factors [14, 40, 44, 52, 6173]. These designs are often similar to those used in the early SES → outcome studies group except that CVD risk factors are the outcomes. The life course hypotheses typically examined, however, include both the latent effects and pathway conceptual models. The typical study design involves a statistical model where early-life SES measures predict the levels of CVD risk factors in adulthood.

Early SES → risk factor studies: summary of results

Table 3 outlines the 17 studies reviewed (see Additional file 2 for detailed summaries). Five of six studies reported associations between low early-life SES and little or no adult leisure-time physical activity [14, 61, 63, 64, 66], five of five found associations with high adult alcohol intake [52, 61, 63, 68, 73], and eight of twelve studies reported associations with higher smoking rates as study findings [14, 44, 52, 63, 6568]. Nine of 11 studies reported (unadjusted) associations between lower early-life SES and elevated BMI or WHR [14, 44, 63, 64, 67, 68, 70, 71, 73]. The impact of a statistical adjustment for other CVD risk factors varied, including no impact [59], attenuation with a persistence of the significant effect [46, 55], and strong attenuation with associations no longer apparent [54, 78].
Table 3

Summary of SES – CVD life course studies using an early SES → risk factor design

1st Author, year & reference number

Study name

Early life and/or adult SES measures

Variables adjusted for other than age

CVD risk factor(s) measured

Arnesen 1985 [65]

Tromso Heart Study

Early-life: 4-level index of household economic conditions

CVD RF's

Cholesterol, SBP, glucose, BMI, smoking, more

Notkola 1985 [40]

East-West Study

Early-life: 5-level index using father's occup & farm size; Adult: occup (6 groups)

None

Smoking, cholesterol, SBP

Wadsworth 1985 [98]

Medical Research Council

National Survey of Health Study

Early-life: index of father's occup & parents' edu; Adult: occup (RG) & employment

CVD RF's

SBP, DBP

Braddon 1986 [71]

British 1946 Birth Cohort

Early-life: 2 social class indices of father's occup; Adult: occup (RG, 8 groups), edu (high/low)

Adult SES, CVD RF's

Obesity (BMI > 30.0 for men, > 29.1 for women)

Peck 1994 [66]

Swedish census cohort study

Early-life: father's occup (7 groups); Adult: occup (7 groups)

None

Smoking, physical activity

Blane 1996 [64]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup (RG, 4 groups); Adult: occup (RG, 4 groups)

Adult SES

DBP, physical activity, smoking, BMI, FEV1, more

Lynch 1997 [99]

Kuopio Study

Child: SES index (3 groups); Adolescent: edu (3 groups); Adult: occup, income, possessions, more

Energy intake

Smoking, drinking, obesity, physical activity, diet

Power 1997a [14]

1958 British Birth Cohort

Child: father's occup (RG, 4 groups); At 23 years: occup, edu; At 33 years: occup

None

BMI (obesity)

Power 1997b [90]

1958 British Birth Cohort

Child: father's occup (RG, 4 groups); At 23 years: occup, edu; At 33 years: occup

None

Smoking, BMI (obesity)

Davey Smith 1998 [44]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup (4 groups); Adult: occup (6 groups)

None

Smoking, DBP, cholesterol, BMI, FEV1

van de Mheen 1998 [63]

Longitudinal Study, Netherlands

Early-life: father's occup (6 groups); Adult: occup (6 groups)

Adult SES

BMI, smoking, alcohol, leisure physical activity

Brunner 1999 [67]

Whitehall II Study

Early-life: father's occup (RG, 4 groups); Adult: occup (Civil Service grade, 4 groups)

Adult SES

Smoking, activity, HDL, BMI, fibrinogen, more

Davey Smith 2002 [52]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup (mnl/non-mnl); Adult: occup (mnl/non-mnl)

None

Smoking, alcohol, area deprivation

Lawlor 2002 [68]

British Women's Heart Study

Early-life: father's occup (RG, 6 groups); Adult: current occup (RG, 6 groups)

Adult SES

Insulin resistance, SBP, cholesterol, BMI, smoking, triglycerides, alcohol, more

Poulton 2002 [73]

Dunedin Multidisciplinary Study

Early-life: parental occup (6 groups) at 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 & 15 years; Adult: current occup (3 groups)

Adult SES

BMI, WHR, SBP, smoking, alcohol, more

Lawlor 2003 [69]

British Women's Heart Study

Early-life: father's longest occup (mnl / non-mnl); Adult: longest occup (RG, 6 groups)

CVD RF's

HOMA, SBP, HDL, triglycerides

Parker 2003 [70]

Newcastle 1000 Families Study

Birth: father's occup & housing; 5 & 10 years: same, plus adverse life events; Adult: wage earner's occup

None

CMS, BMI, WHR, fasting insulin, triglycerides, HDL

BMI = Body mass index; CMS = Central metabolic syndrome; DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; Edu = Education; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; HOMA = Homeostasis model assessment score; Mnl = Manual occupational class; Non-mnl = Non-manual occupational class; Occup = Occupation; RF = Risk factor; RG = Registrar General's social class categories; SBP = Systolic blood pressure; WHR = Waist-to-hip ratio.

Early SES → risk factor studies: methodologic issues

As with the early SES → outcome studies, concerns that lack of adequate adjustment or over-adjustment may lead to biased estimates are germane to this group of studies. The issue of covariate adjustment is complex in these studies, given that many CVD risk factors are considered. Certain physiologic risk factors (e.g., insulin resistance, dyslipidemia) may be linked to early-life SES through latent physiologic effects of negative childhood exposures, continuous exposure to negative physiologic stimuli, or other physiologic or life course pathway mechanisms [14, 63, 70, 74]. In contrast, the links between early-life SES and levels of behavioral risk factors (e.g., smoking, diet), and certain physiologic risk factors (e.g., BMI, hypertension), may operate principally through learned behaviors, behavioral responses to negative psychosocial stimuli, or other psychosocial life course pathway effects. The associations may develop through the operation of multiple physiologic and psychosocial pathways, making "correct" covariate adjustment challenging within a single model. Thus, statistical adjustment should take into account the specific life course pathways hypothesized to be operating [39]. Previous findings should be used to generate a priori hypotheses; nonetheless, there is considerable opportunity for inappropriate adjustments to be made.

Social trajectory studies: overview

Studies evaluating the social mobility life course model typically considered the impact of inter-generational or intra-generational social mobility on CVD and CVD risk factors [38, 44, 49, 64, 72, 73, 7579]. Inter-generational mobility was usually determined by contrasting the participant's father's occupational SES to the participants'. Intra-generational SES was typically defined as a change in occupational SES from early adulthood to later adulthood. Six of 11 studies evaluated adult CVD risk factors as outcomes [49, 64, 72, 73, 75, 77]; seven evaluated CVD mortality or CHD [38, 44, 7579]. Four adjusted only for age [38, 49, 76, 80].

Social trajectory studies: summary of results

Table 4 outlines these studies (see Additional file 3 for greater detail). Of 10 studies carrying out statistical analyses [38, 44, 49, 72, 73, 7579], six did not report associations between upward or downward mobility and either elevated levels of CVD risk factors or increased CVD morbidity or mortality when compared to stable low-SES or high-SES trajectories [38, 44, 49, 75, 78, 79]. Nine studies, however, reported the suggestion of inverse, although not always statistically significant, relationships between social mobility and a CVD-related outcome [38, 44, 72, 73, 7579]. Two studies found marked differences in CVD mortality risk between upwardly mobile individuals and individuals maintaining the same SES across time. However, one study reported increased CVD risk among the upwardly mobile [77] and one reported decreased mortality risk [79].
Table 4

Summary of SES – CVD life course studies using a social trajectory design

1st Author, year & reference number

Study name

SES measures

Variables adjusted for other than age

CVD risk factor(s) / outcomes measured

Kaplan 1971 [76]

Evans County Heart Study

Early-life: father's occup (7 groups); Early Adult & Adult: occup & social class (5 classes)

None

MI, chronic IHD, AP, sudden death

Gillum 1978 [77]

Harvard Alumni Cohort

Early-life: by parental occup (blue/white collar); Adult: assumed to be at least middle class

A confounder summarizing score

AP, HTN, fatal or non-fatal CHD or MI

Burr 1980 [49]

South Wales hospital cohort

Father's occup (RG, 3 groups), father unemployed (> than 1 year), family size, current occup (RG, 3 groups)

None

Survived MI

Wadsworth 1985 [72]

British 1946 Birth Cohort

Early-life: index of father's occup and parents' edu; Adult: occup (RG), employment & edu for women

Smoking, edu, father's CVD, BMI, more

SBP, DBP

Faresjo 1994 [78]

Swedish Study of Men Born in 1913

Early-life: father's SES (3 groups) by occup, social class; Adult: same; all mobility relative to child SES

SBP, cholesterol, smoking

MI

Lynch 1994 [38]

Kuopio Study

Early-life: SES index (3 groups); Adult: current income (2 groups)

None

CVD mortality

Blane 1996 [64]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup (RG, 4 groups); Adult: occup (RG, 4 groups)

BMI, cholesterol, DBP, smoking, activity, FEV1

BMI, cholesterol, DBP, smoking, activity, FEV1

Hart 1998 [75]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup (mnl/non-mnl); Labor force entry: occup (mnl/non-mnl); Adult: occup (mnl/non-mnl), area deprivation index

Smoking, DBP, cholesterol, FEV1, angina, ischemia

CVD mortality & risk factors listed

Davey Smith 1998 [44]

Collaborative Study

Early-life: father's occup: (RG, mnl/non-mnl); Adult: occup: (RG, mnl/non-mnl)

Smoking, DBP, BMI, area deprivation, more

Mortality from CHD & stroke

Poulton 2002 [73]

Dunedin Multidisciplinary Study

Early-life: parental occup (6 groups) at 0, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 & 15 years; Adult: current occup (3 groups)

Infant health index, gender, adult SES

BMI, WHR, SBP, smoking, alcohol dependence

Pensola 2003 [79]

Finnish census cohort

Early-life: father's occup (mnl vs. non-mnl); Adult: current occup (mnl vs. non-mnl)

None

CVD mortality

AP = Angina pectoris; BMI = Body mass index; CHD = Coronary heart disease; DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; Edu = Education; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; HTN = Hypertension; IHD = Ischemic heart disease; MI = Myocardial infarction; Mnl = Manual occupational class; Non-mnl = Non-manual occupational class; Occup = Occupation; RG = Registrar General's social class categories; SBP = Systolic blood pressure; WHR = Waist-to-hip ratio.

Four studies examined differences in CVD risk between stable low-SES trajectory and stable high-SES trajectory individuals [38, 44, 75, 79]. Three reported that individuals with stable low-SES trajectories had a greater CVD risk than stable high-SES trajectory individuals [44, 75, 79]; the fourth reported a marginally significantly greater risk [38]. These results are similar to those of most cumulative SES studies (described below) in that greater exposure to low SES was associated with increased CVD risk.

Social trajectory studies: methodologic issues

In these studies the unit of analysis is a trajectory, permitting the impact of change over time to be examined. However, the socioeconomic trajectories in most reviewed studies were limited to two time points, and groups compared tended to share the same SES at one of these time points. These similarities may partly explain why seven of ten studies did not report an association between social mobility and risk of CVD risk factors or events. Social trajectory studies incorporating SES at three or more time points allow for the analysis of more informative trajectories than studies evaluating SES at only two points [75]. Yet, even with large studies, analysis becomes cumbersome if more than two or three SES levels at three time points are measured. Additionally, the impact of uncommon (e.g. downward) trajectories are difficult to study due to the small numbers of individuals who typically comprise them.

Cumulative SES studies: overview

These studies tested the operation of the cumulative life course conceptual model, typically by summing the number of times participants experienced unfavorable SES situations during early, middle or later life, and creating SES indices representing the accumulation of these experiences [45, 52, 53, 68, 79, 81, 82]. For example, three of these studies summed the number of times a participant (or their parents during the participant's childhood) had been in a manual occupation to create an index of accumulated low-SES exposure [68, 81, 82]. Cumulative SES was also measured using indices of occupational class, socioeconomic categories, exposures to negative socioeconomic experiences/conditions, income, and housing conditions. [45, 52, 53, 68, 81, 82].

Cumulative SES studies: summary of results

Table 5 summarizes the seven cumulative SES studies (see Additional file 4 for greater detail). All authors reported that participants' cumulative life course exposure to low SES conditions was associated with increases in CVD outcome, supporting the cumulative life course SES hypothesis. Several studies indicated that cumulative SES was a more powerful predictor of CVD morbidity and/or mortality than adult or early-life SES alone [45, 53, 79, 81]. In studies that adjusted for CVD risk factors, graded associations were attenuated but remained strong in two studies [81, 82] and were greatly attenuated in another [45].
Table 5

Summary of SES – CVD life course studies using a cumulative SES design

1st Author, year & reference number

Study name

Cumulative SES measure(s)

Variables adjusted for other than age

CVD risk factor(s) / outcomes measured

Davey-Smith 1997 [82]

Collaborative Study

Sum of # of times at mnl vs. non-mnl SES using father's, own first, & own current occup class

BMI, DBP, FEV1, cholesterol, smoking, AP, ischemia, more

CVD, mortality, AP, smoking, BMI, DBP, cholesterol, more

Heslop 2001 [81]

Collaborative Study

Sum of # of times at mnl vs. non-mnl SES using father's, own first, & own current class

DBP, BMI, FEV1, cholesterol, activity, smoking, alcohol

CVD mortality, DBP, BMI, FEV1, exercise, smoking, alcohol, more

Wamala 2001 [45]

Stockholm Study

Sum of # of instances (0–6) of SES disadvantage (large family, born last, low edu, blue-collar/ housewife, economic hardship)

Height, HDL, HTN, marriage, fibrinogen, obesity, smoking, more

Cases: CHD event (acute MI, unstable/ recurrent AP)

Davey-Smith 2002 [52]

Collaborative Study

Sum of # of risks (0–6): Father mnl SES, left edu at < 15 years, current mnl SES, smoking, high alcohol, high deprivation area

None

CVD mortality

Lawlor 2002 [68]

British Women's Heart Study

Cross-classification of father's longest occup and current occup (RG, mnl/non-mnl)

None

Insulin resistance, HTN, smoking, triglycerides, LDL, HDL, BMI, more

Claussen 2003 [53]

Oslo Mortality Study

Early life: Index of housing conditions (scored 0–7) Adulthood: standardized income (7 groups)

None

CVD mortality

Pensola 2003 [79]

Finnish census cohort

Sum of # of times in mnl vs. non-mnl class, by father's occup & own occup at 30–34

None

CVD mortality

AP = Angina pectoris; BMI = Body mass index; CHD = Coronary heart disease; DBP = Diastolic blood pressure; Edu = Education; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 second; HTN = Hypertension; MI = Myocardial infarction; Mnl = Manual occupational class; Non-mnl = Non-manual occupational class; Occup = Occupation; RG = Registrar General's social class categories.

Davey-Smith et al. (2002) employed a unique cumulative SES measure, combining early and later-life occupational class experience with the CVD risk factors of smoking and heavy alcohol consumption [52]. They reported a marked, graded relationship between the number of negative SES exposures and risk of CVD mortality.

Only a large cohort study of Norwegians reported a statistically significant supra-multiplicative interaction between early- and later-life SES on risk of CVD [53]. Another study reported marginally statistically significant supra-multiplicative interaction effects between early and later life [45].

Cumulative SES studies: methodologic issues

The reported associations between cumulative SES and CVD risk are more consistent than those reported in the other life course study designs. However, three of the seven studies evaluated were based on the same cohort [52, 81, 82]. Cumulative life course SES variables include current SES, and therefore may be conflating the effect of current SES with that of SES over the life course. For example, in Pensola et al. (2003), social mobility analyses suggested that the observed gradient in CVD mortality associated with cumulative manual occupational class was driven primarily by the impact of current occupational status. Additionally, cumulative indices implicitly assume that a specific negative life experience or situation has the same impact regardless of when it occurs in an individual's lifetime, with no distinction made between the impact of childhood versus adult events on risk of disease [45]. Furthermore, some cumulative SES studies combined disparate measures into a single, lifetime index variable, or summed the number of times different negative events or exposures occur [45, 52]. This approach assumes that different types of exposures have an equivalent impact on the risk of CVD. Evidence supporting these assumptions is not provided in these studies.

Discussion

General life course SES study issues

Certain general limitations and assumptions of life course SES studies should be considered. First of all, SES is a theoretical construct operationalized using various measures (e.g., income, occupation, education) that tap into different components of this construct. Despite several proposed SES evaluation schemes [8385], there is no overarching theory in the biomedical literature providing a rationale for the use of specific SES measures. Occupational status, the SES measure most commonly used in the studies reviewed, is assumed to be an adequate proxy of SES, but in fact represents only one component of SES. As associations of a given SES measure with CVD risk factors are not always consistent with those of other SES measures [47, 60], it is important to consider that results may depend upon the proxy SES measure employed [64, 81].

Most life course studies used retrospective cohorts or a case-control design, relying on participants' recall of early life SES. There has been little systematic evaluation of the validity of recalled early life circumstances or of the potential for such recall errors to bias associations. In studies directly comparing the impact of childhood and adult SES on adult CVD risk, greater error in childhood (vs. adult) SES measures may underestimate the true impact of child SES [86, 87]. Additionally, selection bias due to either loss to follow-up or selective survival may distort findings. Studies using cohorts followed from birth or early life probably do not have these limitations [14, 28, 47, 62, 71, 72, 77, 8893] and may avoid the problem of changing occupational status and workplace functions across time if they establish SES scales at the time of measurement and update them as appropriate. As more studies analyze data from prospective cohorts starting in early life, concerns about unequal measurement error and the changing status of specific occupations should decrease [14, 54, 73, 89, 93, 94].

Most studies were limited to white males. While the number of studies including women has increased in recent years, minority groups remain underrepresented in most life course studies. These groups may interact differently with the economic and/or social systems of the majority group; there are also established associations between minority status, low SES, and increased CVD risk [5, 84, 85]. The lack of information on the manner in which life course SES relates to adult CVD risk in minorities should be addressed.

Support for life course effects on CVD risk

The majority of the early SES → outcome group studies' results describe an inverse association between early life SES and risk of adult CHD, non-fatal MI, and CVD mortality. Similarly most early SES → risk factor studies suggest that low early-life SES negatively impacts levels of adult CVD risk factors. Most studies reported relationships between lower early-life SES and elevated alcohol intake, BMI/WHR, and insulin resistance, as well as decreased leisure physical activity. Together, the early SES → outcome and early SES → risk factor studies support the hypothesis that low early-life SES is inversely associated with adult risk of CVD. However, support for the hypothesis of a "direct effect" of early-life SES on risk of CVD mortality is equivocal as findings were less consistent after risk factor adjustment. Additionally, reported associations between early-life SES and adult health behaviors detract from the evidence supporting a latent effects life course model, as they suggest that CVD risk may be driven by learned behaviors.

The operation of social chains of risk or life trajectories described by a pathway life course model are difficult to observe or test, since almost all early SES → risk factor studies consider only two points during the life course. However, significant associations between early-life SES and the adult risk factors suggest behavioral, psychosocial or environmental links that may be best explained as a pathway effect. As described below, the pathway model will need further examination through the use of series of linked studies.

While nine of 10 social trajectory studies reported some relationship between inter- or intra-generational social mobility and CVD-related outcomes, only four were identified as providing evidence in favor of a social mobility hypothesis. Conversely, most studies comparing stable low- and high-SES trajectory groups reported markedly increased CVD mortality among the low-SES group, with many socially mobile groups having a CVD risk between the stable high and low groups. Determining whether these associations are a function of social mobility, or whether they are due to exposure to low SES at some point in the life course and not to mobility, is problematic. Future studies should focus on differentiating between the influences of cumulative SES and social mobility.

Of the conceptual models discussed, the cumulative life course model was the most consistently supported. However, the weight of these findings is limited as much of the data came from one cohort [57, 60, 61]. Also, specific methodological concerns (e.g., equal weighting of life course periods, conflation of current and life-course SES) need to be considered when interpreting these findings. Future studies conducted in other cohorts that address these concerns will help clarify the viability of cumulative life course SES hypotheses.

Directions for future research

Researchers have noted the limitations of life course SES study designs examining only one potential pathway linking SES and CVD. Accordingly, recent studies tend to use a combination of SES measures, CVD risk factor and/or outcomes and life course study designs [40, 44, 45, 52, 53, 68]. These mixed-design studies allow for a comparison of how well different life course SES conceptual models fit the patterns observed in the same data. Such studies are also less likely to overlook patterns of association in the data than studies which only evaluate one possible relationship between SES and CVD.

As modern life course cohorts are followed from childhood, longer prospective studies or series of cross-sectional studies that evaluate associations between early-life experiences and risk factor levels at several time points may provide the opportunity to observe the operation of pathway life course effects. For example, two studies in the early SES → risk factor group [14, 90] compared levels of CVD risk factors at two points in young adulthood (22 and 33 years of age). The authors observed an association between childhood SES and adult obesity, which was smaller for participants at 33 than at 23 years of age [14], suggesting a decreasing impact of early life SES on adult health with increasing age. Such information is only obtained through longer ongoing studies or series of interrelated studies.

Individuals' socioeconomic environments may impact their CVD risk factor levels and CVD risk. Community socioeconomic conditions may influence individuals' ability to engage in leisure physical activity or eat a healthy diet [9597]. Some life course studies have evaluated the community socioeconomic environment, primarily through the use of indicators of neighborhood deprivation [44, 48, 54, 81, 82]. Future studies should likewise consider the effect of physical and psychosocial environmental factors.

Life course SES studies have generally failed to consider the length of exposure to the various socioeconomic conditions measured. As this may influence the impact of negative SES experiences on adult health, future cumulative life course studies may benefit from evaluating the effect of length of exposure into their indices.

Conclusions

The wide range of populations, analysis designs, exposures, and outcomes used in the life course studies reviewed precludes a simple, quantitative analysis of the impact of life course SES on CVD risk. Nevertheless, the results thus far modestly support the existence of life course SES effects on risk of adult CVD. The cumulative life course model is more consistently supported by extant studies than other models. However, the different methodologic issues of each study design make direct comparisons of the relative support for each conceptual model difficult. Analyses utilizing multiple life course designs within the same study offer the best approach to testing which theories best describe the links between life course SES and CVD risk. The inclusion of minority participants, different SES measures, and data from early and middle adulthood in large, prospective, mixed-design studies will allow more informed and generalizable statements to be made about the impact of life course SES on adult disease risk. While this area of research needs methodologic refinement, it offers a promising and informative perspective from which to understand the development of chronic disease.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

R. A. Pollitt was funded by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Training Grant 5T32-HL007055-27, and by the Life Course SES, Social Context and Cardiovascular Disease (LC-SES) study (NHLBI grant 5-RO1-HL064142-01-04).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

References

  1. Aronowitz RA: Making Sense of Illness: Science, Society, and Disease. Cambridge history of medicine. 1998, Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Labarthe D: Causation and prevention of cardiovascular diseases: An overview of the contributions of 20th-century epidemiology. Epidemiology and prevention of cardiovascular diseases : a global challenge. 1998, Gaithersburg, Md., Aspen Publishers, 17-25.Google Scholar
  3. Kuh D, Smith GD: The life course and adult chronic disease: an historical perspective with particular reference to coronary heart disease. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Edited by: Kuh D and Ben-Shlomo Y. 1997, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 15-41.Google Scholar
  4. Kaplan GA, Keil JE: Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993, 88: 1973-1998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Labarthe D, Heiss G: Epidemiology and prevention of cardiovascular diseases : a global challenge. 1998, Gaithersburg, Md., Aspen Publishers, xix, 681-Google Scholar
  6. Lenfant C: Conference on Socioeconomic Status and Cardiovascular Health and disease. Circulation. 1996, 94: 2041-2044.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinkle LEJ, Whitney LH, Lehman EW, Dunn J, Benjamin B, King R, Plakun A, Flehinger B: Occupation, education, and coronary heart disease. Risk is influenced more by education and background than by occupational experiences, in the Bell System. Science. 1968, 161: 238-246.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Stamler J: Established major coronary risk factors. Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiology: From Aetiology to Public Health. Edited by: Marmot M and Elliott P. 1992, Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, 35-66.Google Scholar
  9. Marmot M, Kogevinas M, Elston MA: Social/economic status and disease. Ann Rev Public Health. 1987, 8: 111-135. 10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.000551.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Sorlie PD, Backlund E, Keller JB: US mortality by economic, demographic, and social characteristics: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Am J Public Health. 1995, 85: 949-956.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Marmot MG, Smith GD, Stansfeld S, Patel C, North F, Head J, White I, Brunner E, Feeney A: Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991, 337: 1387-1393. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93068-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Martikainen P, Makela P, Koskinen S, Valkonen T: Income differences in mortality: a register-based follow-up study of three million men and women. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30: 1397-1405. 10.1093/ije/30.6.1397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y: A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. 1997, Oxford, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Power C, Hertzman C: Social and biological pathways linking early life and adult disease. Br Med Bull. 1997, 53: 210-221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartley M, Plewis I: Does health-selective mobility account for socioeconomic differences in health? Evidence from England and Wales, 1971 to 1991. J Health Soc Behav. 1997, 38: 376-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Doornbos G, Kromhout D: Educational level and mortality in a 32-year follow-up study of 18-year-old men in The Netherlands. Int J Epidemiol. 1990, 19: 374-379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elder GH: The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. Examining lives in context : perspectives on the ecology of human development. Edited by: Moen P, Elder GH and Lüscher K. 1995, Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, xx, 708-1stGoogle Scholar
  18. Hertzman C: The lifelong impact of childhood experiences: A population health perspective. Daedalus. 1994, 123: 167-180.Google Scholar
  19. Kuh D, Smith GD: When is mortality risk determined? Historical insights into a current debate. Soc Hist Med. 1993, 6: 101-123.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuh D, Power C, Blane D, Bartley M: Social pathways between childhood and adult health. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology. Edited by: Kuh D and Ben-Shlomo Y. 1997, Oxford ; New York, Oxford University Press, 169-198.Google Scholar
  21. Repetti RL, Taylor SE, Seeman TE: Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol Bull. 2002, 128: 330-366. 10.1037//0033-2909.128.2.230.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rutter M: Pathways from childhood to adult life. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1989, 30: 23-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith GD, Gunnell D, Ben-Shlomo Y: Lifecourse approaches to socio-economic differentials in cause-specific adult mortality. Poverty, inequality and health : an international perspective. Edited by: Leon DA and Walt G. 2001, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 88-124.Google Scholar
  24. Bartley M, Blane D, Montgomery S: Health and the life course: why safety nets matter. Bmj. 1997, 314: 1194-1196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Beckett M: Converging health inequalities in later life--an artifact of mortality selection. J Health Soc Behav. 2000, 41: 106-119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D: A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 285-293. 10.1093/ije/31.2.285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Halfon N, Hochstein M: Life course health development: an integrated framework for developing health, policy, and research. Milbank Q. 2002, 80: 433-79, iii. 10.1111/1468-0009.00019.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Hertzman C, Power C, Matthews S, Manor O: Using an interactive framework of society and lifecourse to explain self-rated health in early adulthood. Soc Sci Med. 2001, 53: 1575-1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00437-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stansfeld SA, Marmot MG: Stress and the heart : psychosocial pathways to coronary heart disease. 2002, London, BMJ Books, xi, 304-Google Scholar
  30. Stern J: Social mobility and the interpretation of social class mortality differentials. J Soc Policy. 1983, 12: 27-49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Blane D: The life course, the social gradient, and health. Social Determinants of Health. Edited by: Marmot M and Wilkinson RG. 1999, , Oxford University Press, 65-80.Google Scholar
  32. Forsdahl A: Living conditions in childhood and subsequent development of risk factors for arteriosclerotic heart disease. The cardiovascular survey in Finnmark 1974-75. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978, 32: 34-37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. West P: Rethinking the health selection explanation for health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32: 373-384. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90338-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Blane D, Smith GD, Bartley M: Social selection: what does it contribute to social class differences in health?. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1993, 15: 1-15. 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11343777.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith GD, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J: Life course approaches to inequalities in coronary heart disease risk. Stress and the heart : psychosocial pathways to coronary heart disease. Edited by: Stansfeld SA and Marmot MG. 2002, London, BMJ Books, 21-49.Google Scholar
  36. Greenland S: Meta-Analysis. Modern Epidemiology. Edited by: Rothman KJ, Greenland S and Sonis J. 1998, Philadelphia, Pa., Lippincott-Raven, xiii, 737-2ndGoogle Scholar
  37. Coggon D, Margetts B, Barker DJ, Carson PH, Mann JS, Oldroyd KG, Wickham C: Childhood risk factors for ischaemic heart disease and stroke. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1990, 4: 464-469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Cohen RD, Kauhanen J, Wilson TW, Smith NL, Salonen JT: Childhood and adult socioeconomic status as predictors of mortality in Finland. Lancet. 1994, 343: 524-527. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91468-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gliksman MD, Kawachi I, Hunter D, Colditz GA, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Hennekens CH: Childhood socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in middle aged US women: a prospective study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995, 49: 10-15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Notkola V, Punsar S, Karvonen MJ, Haapakoski J: Socio-economic conditions in childhood and mortality and morbidity caused by coronary heart disease in adulthood in rural Finland. Soc Sci Med. 1985, 21: 517-523. 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90035-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lamont D, Parker L, White M, Unwin N, Bennett SM, Cohen M, Richardson D, Dickinson HO, Adamson A, Alberti KG, Craft AW: Risk of cardiovascular disease measured by carotid intima-media thickness at age 49-51: lifecourse study. Bmj. 2000, 320: 273-278. 10.1136/bmj.320.7230.273.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hart CL, Smith GD, Blane D: Inequalities in mortality by social class measured at 3 stages of the lifecourse. Am J Public Health. 1998, 88: 471-474.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaplan GA, Salonen JT: Socioeconomic conditions in childhood and ischaemic heart disease during middle age. Bmj. 1990, 301: 1121-1123.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith GD, Hart C, Blane D, Hole D: Adverse socioeconomic conditions in childhood and cause specific adult mortality: prospective observational study. Bmj. 1998, 316: 1631-1635.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Wamala SP, Lynch J, Kaplan GA: Women's exposure to early and later life socioeconomic disadvantage and coronary heart disease risk: the Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30: 275-284. 10.1093/ije/30.2.275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Marmot M, Shipley M, Brunner E, Hemingway H: Relative contribution of early life and adult socioeconomic factors to adult morbidity in the Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001, 55: 301-307. 10.1136/jech.55.5.301.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith GD, McCarron P, Okasha M, McEwen J: Social circumstances in childhood and cardiovascular disease mortality: prospective observational study of Glasgow University students. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001, 55: 340-341. 10.1136/jech.55.5.340.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Hasle H: Association between living conditions in childhood and myocardial infarction. Bmj. 1990, 300: 512-513.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Burr ML, Sweetnam PM: Family size and paternal unemployment in relation to myocardial infarction. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980, 34: 93-95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Vagero D, Leon D: Effect of social class in childhood and adulthood on adult mortality. Lancet. 1994, 343: 1224-1225. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92432-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Lundberg O: The impact of childhood living conditions on illness and mortality in adulthood. Soc Sci Med. 1993, 36: 1047-1052. 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90122-K.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith GD, Hart C: Life-course socioeconomic and behavioral influences on cardiovascular disease mortality: the collaborative study. Am J Public Health. 2002, 92: 1295-1298.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Claussen B, Davey Smith G, Thelle D: Impact of childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position on cause specific mortality: the Oslo Mortality Study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 40-45. 10.1136/jech.57.1.40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Frankel S, Smith GD, Gunnell D: Childhood socioeconomic position and adult cardiovascular mortality: the Boyd Orr Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1999, 150: 1081-1084.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Osler M, Andersen AMN, Due P, Lund R, Damsgaard MT, Holstein BE: Socioeconomic position in early life, birth weight, childhood cognitive function, and adult mortality. A longitudinal study of Danish men born in 1953. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 681-686. 10.1136/jech.57.9.681.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Dedman DJ, Gunnell D, Davey Smith G, Frankel S: Childhood housing conditions and later mortality in the Boyd Orr cohort. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001, 55: 10-15. 10.1136/jech.55.1.10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Robins JM, Greenland S: Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992, 3: 143-155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Cole SR, Hernan MA: Fallibility in estimating direct effects. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 163-165. 10.1093/ije/31.1.163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Poole C, Kaufman JS: What does standard adjustment for downstream mediators tell us about social effect pathways?. Am J Epidemiol. 2000, 151: S52-Google Scholar
  60. Robins JM: General methodological considerations. Journal of Econometrics. 2003, 112: 89-106. 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00151-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Lynch JW, Kaplan GA, Salonen JT: Why do poor people behave poorly? Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 44: 809-819. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00191-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Manor O, Matthews S, Power C: Comparing measures of health inequality. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45: 761-771. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00412-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. van de Mheen H, Stronks K, Looman CW, Mackenbach JP: Does childhood socioeconomic status influence adult health through behavioural factors?. Int J Epidemiol. 1998, 27: 431-437. 10.1093/ije/27.3.431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Blane D, Hart CL, Smith GD, Gillis CR, Hole DJ, Hawthorne VM: Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and during adulthood. Bmj. 1996, 313: 1434-1438.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Arnesen E, Forsdahl A: The Tromso heart study: coronary risk factors and their association with living conditions during childhood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985, 39: 210-214.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Peck MN: The importance of childhood socio-economic group for adult health. Soc Sci Med. 1994, 39: 553-562. 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90098-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Brunner E, Shipley MJ, Blane D, Smith GD, Marmot MG: When does cardiovascular risk start? Past and present socioeconomic circumstances and risk factors in adulthood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999, 53: 757-764.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Davey Smith G: Socioeconomic position in childhood and adulthood and insulin resistance: cross sectional survey using data from British women's heart and health study. BMJ. 2002, 325: 805-10.1136/bmj.325.7368.805.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S: Life Course Influences on Insulin Resistance: Findings from the British Women's Heart and Health Study. Diabetes Care. 2003, 26: 97-103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Parker L, Lamont DW, Unwin N, Pearce MS, Bennett SM, Dickinson HO, White M, Mathers JC, Alberti KG, Craft AW: A lifecourse study of risk for hyperinsulinaemia, dyslipidaemia and obesity (the central metabolic syndrome) at age 49-51 years. Diabet Med. 2003, 20: 406-415. 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00949.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Braddon FE, Rodgers B, Wadsworth ME, Davies JM: Onset of obesity in a 36 year birth cohort study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986, 293: 299-303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Wadsworth ME, Cripps HA, Midwinter RE, Colley JR: Blood pressure in a national birth cohort at the age of 36 related to social and familial factors, smoking, and body mass. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985, 291: 1534-1538.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Poulton R, Caspi A, Milne BJ, Thomson WM, Taylor A, Sears MR, Moffitt TE: Association between children's experience of socioeconomic disadvantage and adult health: a life-course study. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1640-1645. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11602-3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Brunner E, Davey Smith G, Marmot M, Canner R, Beksinska M, O'Brien J: Childhood social circumstances and psychosocial and behavioural factors as determinants of plasma fibrinogen. Lancet. 1996, 347: 1008-1013. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90147-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Hart CL, Smith GD, Blane D: Social mobility and 21 year mortality in a cohort of Scottish men. Soc Sci Med. 1998, 47: 1121-1130. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00061-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Kaplan BH, Cassel JC, Tyroler HA, Cornoni JC, Kleinbaum DG, Hames CG: Occupational mobility and coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 1971, 128: 938-942. 10.1001/archinte.128.6.938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Gillum RF, Paffenbarger RSJ: Chronic disease in former college students. XVII. Sociocultural mobility as a precursor of coronary heart disease and hypertension. Am J Epidemiol. 1978, 108: 289-298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Faresjo T, Svardsudd K, Tibblin G: Social mobility and health in a prospective study of middle-aged men. Scand J Soc Med. 1994, 22: 86-89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Pensola TH, Martikainen P: Cumulative social class and mortality from various causes of adult men. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003, 57: 745-751. 10.1136/jech.57.9.745.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Heslop P, Smith GD, Macleod J, Hart C: The socioeconomic position of employed women, risk factors and mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2001, 53: 477-485. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00350-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith GD, Hart C, Blane D, Gillis C, Hawthorne V: Lifetime socioeconomic position and mortality: prospective observational study. Bmj. 1997, 314: 547-552.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Berkman LF, Macintyre S: The measurement of social class in health studies: old measures and new formulations. IARC Sci Publ. 1997, 51-64.Google Scholar
  83. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE: Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health. 1997, 18: 341-378. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Liberatos P, Link BG, Kelsey JL: The measurement of social class in epidemiology. Epidemiol Rev. 1988, 10: 87-121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Phillips AN, Smith GD: Bias due to measurement imprecision. Lancet. 1992, 339: 1418-1419. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91242-Z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Phillips AN, Smith GD: How independent are "independent" effects? Relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured imprecisely. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991, 44: 1223-1231. 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90155-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Power CMOFAJFK: Health in Childhood and Social Inequalities in Health in Young Adults. J R Statist Soc A. 1990, 153: 17-28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Power C: A review of child health in the 1958 birth cohort: National Child Development Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1992, 6: 81-110.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Power C, Hertzman C, Matthews S, Manor O: Social differences in health: life-cycle effects between ages 23 and 33 in the 1958 British birth cohort. Am J Public Health. 1997, 87: 1499-1503.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Power C, Matthews S, Manor O: Inequalities in self-rated health: explanations from different stages of life. Lancet. 1998, 351: 1009-1014. 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11082-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Kuh D, Hardy R, Langenberg C, Richards M, Wadsworth ME: Mortality in adults aged 26-54 years related to socioeconomic conditions in childhood and adulthood: post war birth cohort study. Bmj. 2002, 325: 1076-1080. 10.1136/bmj.325.7372.1076.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Wadsworth ME, Kuh DJ: Childhood influences on adult health: a review of recent work from the British 1946 national birth cohort study, the MRC National Survey of Health and Development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997, 11: 2-20. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1997.d01-7.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Butler NR, Golding J: From birth to five : a study of the health and behaviour of Britain's 5-year-olds. 1986, Oxford Oxfordshire ; New York, Pergamon Press, xxxii, 439-Google Scholar
  94. Diez Roux AV, Merkin SS, Hannan P, Jacobs DR, Kiefe CI: Area characteristics, individual-level socioeconomic indicators, and smoking in young adults: the coronary artery disease risk development in young adults study. Am J Epidemiol. 2003, 157: 315-326. 10.1093/aje/kwf207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Morland K, Wing S, Diez Roux A: The contextual effect of the local food environment on residents' diets: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Public Health. 2002, 92: 1761-1767.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Diez Roux AV, Jacobs DR, Kiefe CI: Neighborhood characteristics and components of the insulin resistance syndrome in young adults: the coronary artery risk development in young adults (CARDIA) study. Diabetes Care. 2002, 25: 1976-1982.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. Wadsworth ME: Health inequalities in the life course perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 44: 859-869. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00187-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Lynch J, Kaplan GA, Salonen R, Salonen JT: Socioeconomic status and progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Prospective evidence from the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997, 17: 513-519.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/5/7/prepub

Copyright

© Pollitt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement