Skip to main content
Download PDF

The descriptive analysis of depressive symptoms and White Blood Cell (WBC) count between the sexual minorities and heterosexual identifying individuals in a nationally representative sample: 2005–2014

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 294 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sexual minorities are at a higher risk of suffering from depressive symptoms compared with heterosexual individuals. Only a few studies have examined the conditions of having depressive symptoms within different sexual minority groups, especially people with sexual orientation uncertainty in a nationally representative sample. Furthermore, few studies have explored whether the mean white blood count (WBC) is different between people with and without depressive symptoms among different sexual minority groups in a nationally representative sample.

Methods

We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2005 to 2014 with a sample of 14,090 subjects. We compared the prevalence of depressive symptoms in subpopulations stratified by sex, sexual minority status, and race. We also examined the difference in mean WBC count between depressed and non-depressed people among heterosexual individuals and different sexual minority groups. Additionally, two multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the association between sexual minority status and depressive symptoms, treating sexual minority status as both a binary and categorical variable.

Results

Female sex (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.72—2.22) and sexual minority status (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.47—2.17) were both independently associated with depressive symptoms. Within the sexual minority population, subjects who were unsure about their sexual identities had the highest odds of having depressive symptoms (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.40—4.68). In the subgroup analysis considering intersectionality, black sexual minority females had the highest rate of depressive symptoms (19.4%, 95% CI: 7.72—40.98). Finally, the mean WBC count differed significantly between people with and without depressive symptoms among male heterosexual individuals, female heterosexual individuals, and female sexual minorities, but not among male sexual minorities.

Conclusions

Based on sex, race, and sexual minority status, black females of sexual minority status had the highest rate of depressive symptoms. Within sexual minority groups, participants who were unsure about their sexual identities had the highest odds of having depressive symptoms. Finally, the mean WBC count was significantly higher among people with depressive symptoms than those without depressive symptoms only among male heterosexuals, female heterosexuals, and female sexual minorities, but not among male sexual minorities. Future research should investigate the social and biological mechanisms of the differences.

Peer Review reports

Background

Sexual minorities are defined as those who self-identify as gay/lesbian, bisexual, not sure about their sexual identities, or other sexual orientations/identities [1]. Sexual minorities are prone to more mental and physical health issues compared to their heterosexual counterparts, including higher stress levels [2], higher suicide rates [3, 4], and elevated alcohol and drug use [5].

Depression is a major public health issue in the United States. In 2019, 18.5% of adults reported symptoms of depression that were mild, moderate, or severe in the past 2 weeks [6]. Prior research has indicated elevated levels of depression among sexual minorities [7,8,9]. Several risk factors for sexual minorities’ depressive symptoms include childhood adverse experiences [10], peer violence against people of their sexual orientations [11], and hate crimes [12]. The minority stress model is widely used to explain the adverse conditions introduced to sexual minorities [13, 14]. Sexual minority status imposes additional stress level on stigmatized individuals, including vicarious stress responses that can result from insults to the individual’s collective identity. Although several studies included people whose sexual orientation is uncertain in the UK, few studies have investigated this population in the US, especially on a national population scale [15, 16]. The subgroups within sexual minorities have also not been separately studied regarding if they differ in frequency of depression and severity of depressive symptoms.

Some recent studies have also demonstrated an association between depressive symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers [17, 18]. The change in inflammatory reaction level might be caused by the interaction among the innate and adaptive immune systems, neurotransmitters, and neurocircuits [17, 19]. Researchers have proposed that systemic inflammation is a primary biobehavioral pathway linking sexual and gender stigma to physical health outcomes [20]. Meanwhile, based on the Minority Stress Theory, both the source and the coping strategies of the stressors among sexual minority individuals might lead to the disadvantaged health conditions on the target population. Specifically, they are exposed to excess social stress due to the stigmatized status assigned to their identities by society, for example, devaluation, rejection, disrespect, and even hate crimes. Meanwhile, they may also experience limited access to stress-ameliorating resources (coping, social support) compared to their heterosexual peers because of social exclusion and marginalization [21]. Influenced by the social level factors, individuals are likely to experience depressive symptoms, which triggers the biological interaction between physiological and psychological process, leading to a higher inflammation biomarker level [22, 23]. However, the association was examined only for C reactive protein (CRP) and did not include white blood cell count (WBC), which is a primary and more widely measured inflammatory biomarker [24, 25].

In this study, we aim to 1) use descriptive analysis to examine the prevalence of having depressive symptoms within different sexual minority subgroups, including those who are not sure about their sexual identities; and 2) compare the mean WBC count between people with and without depressive symptoms among heterosexual and sexual minority identifying individuals.

Methods

Study sample and population

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a cross-sectional program designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States [26]. The sample was selected to represent the U.S. population of all ages. The NHANES interview includes demographic, socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related questions, while the examination component consists of medical, dental, and physiological measurements and laboratory tests [27].

In this study, we combined the NHANES data from 2005 to 2014, resulting in a sample of 23,065 individuals. We then excluded participants aged less than 20 years or older than 59 years, since they were not asked to respond to sexual behavior and smoking behavior questionnaires. After dropping observations with missing values on any of the variables used for analysis, we performed our complete analysis on 14,090 eligible subjects.

This study was purely observational and only used publicly available secondary data. Furthermore, all observations were de-identified. The NHANES Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the NHANES program and the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board (ERB) after 2003. No other IRB was required for this study.

Measurements

Sexual minority status

Participants were asked about their sexual orientation, and those who self-identified as gay/lesbian, bisexual, not sure about sexual orientation, and other sexual orientations were considered as sexual minorities in the study. People who self-identified as heterosexuals were not considered as sexual minorities.

Depressive symptoms

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to measure depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 includes nine questions that measure depressive symptoms; each question was scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), resulting in a total score range from 0 to 27. Participants who scored more than 10 were considered to have depressive symptoms [28].

White blood cell (WBC) count

The Beckman Coulter method was used to measure the WBC count. The Beckman Coulter method of sizing and counting particles detects measurable changes in electrical resistance produced by nonconductive particles suspended in an electrolyte solution. Beckman Coulter counted and sized individual particles at a rate of several thousand per second. This method was independent of particle shape, color, and density [29]. In this study, we used the counter with the unit of 1000 cells/ul.

Covariates

Participants’ race was categorized as non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and other races. Other races included Mexican American, Asian, other races, and multi-racial. Education levels were categorized as Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) and above, Associate of Arts (A.A.) and some college, high school graduate, and never completed high school. Income categories were generated by the poverty-income ratio (PIR), which was a ratio of family income to poverty. Specifically, we divided the income level into 4 categories, including poverty (PIR < 1), low income (1.0 <  = PIR < 2.0), middle income (2.0 <  = PIR < 4.0), and high income (PIR >  = 4.0). Smoking status was categorized as smokers, former smokers, and never-smokers. Body mass index (BMI) was used to gauge the weight status of participants. BMI was categorized by underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥ 30.0 kg/m2). We also included the survey year into the data analysis to capture the possible time-based trends.

Statistical analysis

Using descriptive statistics, the proportions of each variable were weighted by the study design, including the sample weight, the cluster, and the strata. By weighing the sample, we took the oversampling and complexity of the study design into consideration and made the results nationally representative. To compare different variables, Rao-Scott Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables, and t-tests were used for continuous variables.

We included several covariates in the multivariable logistic regression models to control for confounding effects, and we provided the directed acyclic graph for the study in the Supplementary table. Two models were fitted to examine such associations: one treated sexual minority status as a binary variable (sexual minority or not), and the other further divided sexual minority members into subgroups as a categorical variable. The coefficients of the variables from these fitted models were defined to be statistically significant if the two-sided P-value was less than 0.05. The data analysis was conducted using Stata/SE Version 16 (College Station, TX).

Results

Demographic characteristics

We examined a sample of 14,090 people in our analysis. After weighing the sample, the sample could represent the demographic characters of 131,958,349 people in the United States. Among the overall sample, 94.1% (95% CI: 93.5–94.8) were heterosexual, and 5.9% (95% CI: 5.2–6.5) belonged to sexual minorities. NHANES asked the self-identified sex of participants, and the answers include male and female. Stratified by biological sex assigned at birth, we found a significant difference in the proportion of the sexual minority sample: 4.8% (3.9–5.8) of males identified themselves as sexual minorities, whereas 6.9% (95% CI: 6.2–7.7) of females identified themselves as sexual minorities. We also found a difference in the proportion of people who had depressive symptoms stratified by biological sex assigned at birth, with 8.0% (95% CI: 7.4–8.7), 5.6% (95% CI: 4.9–6.4), and 10.4% (95% CI: 9.5–11.4) in the overall population, males, and females, respectively. These results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 The weighted demographic characters of the study sample stratified by biological sex, NHANES 2005 to 2014
Full size table

In Table 2, we further stratified the sample by sexual minority status among males and females respectively. In the male population, the proportion of depressive symptoms differed significantly between heterosexual individuals (5.3%, 95% CI: 4.7–6.1) and sexual minorities (10.6%, 95% CI: 7.5–14.7). Similarly significant results were found in females: 9.4% (95% CI: 8.6–10.3) of heterosexual women had depressive symptoms, and the number was 23.7% (95% CI: 19.4–28.7) in sexual minority women.

Table 2 The weighted demographic characters of the study sample stratified by biological sex and sexual identity, NHANES 2005 to 2014
Full size table

To determine whether the inflammatory level was associated with depressive symptoms with regard to covariates, we examined the mean WBC count among subgroups stratified by sexual minorities, sex assigned at birth, and depressive symptoms. Results are summarized in Table 3. Among male heterosexual individuals, the mean WBC count was different between men who did not have depressive symptoms (7.20 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.11–7.28) and those who did (7.68 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.37–8.00). Although the confidence intervals of the point estimates overlapped, this did not preclude significance, especially when the point estimates were different from each other and the overlapping parts were relatively small [30]. Among male sexual minorities, similar differences were found, without statistical significance (Without depressive symptoms: 6.87 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 6.62–7.11 V.S. With depressive symptoms: 6.99 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 6.22 – 7.77; p-value = 0.74).

Table 3 The weighted demographic characters of the study sample stratified by biological sex, sexual identity, and depressive symptoms, NHANES 2005 to 2014
Full size table

Among females, differences in mean WBC count between women who had depressive symptoms and those who did not were both significantly different among heterosexuals (Without depressive symptoms: 7.35 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.26–7.44 V.S. With depressive symptoms: 7.96 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.76 – 8.15; p-value < 0.0001) and sexual minorities respectively (Without depressive symptoms: 7.47 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.21–7.73 V.S. With depressive symptoms: 8.20 per 1000 cells/ul, 95% CI: 7.71 – 8.69; p-value < 0.0001). These results are shown in Table 3.

We also performed a descriptive analysis considering the race of the sample. Black sexual minority females had the highest rate of depressive symptoms (19.4%, 95% CI: 7.72–40.98) compared with male heterosexual individuals in other racial groups (4.8%, 95% CI: 3.73–6.17) (Fig. 1a). Regarding survey years, females had a higher proportion of depressive symptoms in each of the survey years, and the confidence intervals between males and females did not overlap (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Prevalence of depressive symptoms among heterosexual and sexual minority populations, stratified by biological sex: NHANES 2005 to 2014; b Prevalence of depressive symptoms among females and males, stratified by survey year: NHANES 2005 to 2014

Full size image

Multiple logistic regression models

We examined the association between sexual minority status and depressive symptoms using two multiple logistic regression models. In the first model we treated sexual minority status as a binary variable, and found that people who identified as sexual minorities had 1.79 (95% CI: 1.42 – 2.17) times the odds of having depressive symptoms compared to people who were not sexual minorities. Both models were assessed with F-adjusted mean residual test to confirm the goodness of fit (Model 1: F-adjusted test statistic = 0.936, Prob > F = 0.499; Model 2: F-adjusted test statistic = 0.800, Prob > F = 0.617).

In the second model, we further stratified sexual minority status into 4 categories, gay/lesbian, bisexual, not sure about sexual identity, and other sexual identities. Among different sexual minority groups, we found that people who were unsure about their sexual identities had the highest odds of having depressive symptoms compared to heterosexual individuals, but the confidence intervals overlapped with those of other sexual minority groups (2.56, 95% CI: 1.40–4.68). The results were included in Table 4.

Table 4 The association between sexual minority status/sexual orientation groups and depressive symptoms, NHANES 2005 to 2014
Full size table

Discussion

Our study found that female and sexual minority status were both independently associated with having depressive symptoms. Specifically, females had a higher proportion of depressive symptoms compared to males during all survey years. Within the sexual minority population, subjects who were not sure about their sexual identities had the highest odds of having depressive symptoms. In the subgroup analysis considering race, sex, and sexual minority status, Black female sexual minority members had the highest rate of depressive symptoms.

Among male heterosexual individuals, the mean WBC count was significantly different between participants with and without depressive symptoms. Among male sexual minorities, a similar but nonsignificant difference was found. Among females, the mean WBC count was significantly different between people with and without depressive symptoms, and the results also applied to both heterosexual and sexual minority subjects.

Our study’s results agree with the findings that women are at higher risk of having depressive symptoms compared with men [31]. Certain reproductive-related hormonal changes might be the reason for this increased risk [32]. It is also possible that the difference is caused by sex-based reporting differences, where females are more likely to report depression related symptoms compared with males [33, 34]. Other female specific social determinants of depression related symptoms included intimate partner violence, unplanned pregnancy, male gender preference and poor relationship with in-laws [35].

The observed increased risk of depressive symptoms in the sexual minority groups was in line with previous studies [4]. Negative experiences and stressors such as discrimination, victimization, harassment, abuse, increased stress, and lower social and family support may contribute to differing depression rates in sexual minorities compared to heterosexual counterparts [4, 36].

Few studies thus far have included people who were not sure about their sexual orientation in the sexual minority group in a nationally representative sample in the US; thus, the health risk of sexual minority groups might be underestimated. Our study found that people with uncertainty in sexual orientation had the highest odds of suffering from depressive symptoms compared with gay/lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual orientation groups. Uncertainty in general is associated with strong emotions [37] and psychological maladjustment [38]. Several studies indicated the association between uncertainty in sexual orientations and adverse mental health outcomes in the adolescent and early adulthood population [39, 40]. Our study extended this association into the adult population. This is reasonable because the exploration of relationships, although essential and meaningful, increased stressors in both the adult and adolescent population and led to depressive and anxious symptoms [41]. Researchers have also found that identity uncertainty is associated with increased levels of internalized homophobia in sexual minorities [41, 42]. This is possibly because sexual minorities may be more likely to internalize society’s negative attitudes toward homosexuality to define themselves [42].

In the subgroup analysis, we found that Black female sexual minorities had the highest rate of depressive symptoms. This could be partially explained by the disadvantages of poverty and more limited education in this subgroup [43]. According to the minority stress model, sexual minority individuals were embedded with more stigma, prejudice, and discrimination compared with heterosexual individuals [44]. It is likely that systemic racism faced by the Black population further worsened the mental health conditions of this subpopulation [45, 46]. From an intersectionality perspective, the subgroup of Black female sexual minorities are faced with overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage, leading to their health inequality conditions [47, 48].

Our study found that the mean WBC count was significantly different between people who had and those who did not have depressive symptoms among all combinations of gender and sexual orientation except male sexual minorities. Although the confidence intervals for the point estimate of the mean WBC overlapped among subgroups, it did not preclude statistical significance [30, 49]. Together with confidence intervals, point estimates also provided valuable information on health science research [50,51,52,53]. In a systematic review examining the effect of acute experimental inflammation on negative biases, researchers found evidence for experimental inflammation on negative biases in emotional processing, and negative biases in emotional processing are thought to be of central importance in the development and maintenance of depression [54]. Another review also suggested that chronic stress is associated with increased inflammatory activity and enhanced attentional processing of negative information [55]. These findings indicate that systematic inflammation and affective-cognitive processes may be intertwined and might potentiate one another’s impact on depressive symptoms. However, we did not find a significant difference in mean WBC count between depressed and non-depressed people among male sexual minorities. A possible explanation was that people with and without depressive symptoms within this subpopulation experienced similar stress levels, compared with other subgroups. Although the cause of this is not known, it might be related to the effects of social stigma surrounding homosexuality in males or the living styles in which sexual minority males differ from other subgroups [56]. The mechanisms also might include discrimination, insufficient social support, and HIV related stigma [57, 58].

Furthermore, unequal health care systems faced by sexual and gender minority individuals (SGM) might drive the elevated WBC count in the target population. In the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW) from 2014 to 2016, researchers showed that LGB individuals are more likely to delay health care than non-LGB individuals, and trans respondents were more likely to report poor quality of care than non-LGBT. These delays in and low-quality of health care can lead to an increased level of inflammation biomarkers [59,60,61].

This study has several limitations. First, several factors, including lifestyles, diseases, gender minority and transgender information, might also affect depression levels and the mean WBC count. However, they were not reported in the questionnaire of the national sample, and therefore unavailable in this work. Second, due to the nature of the cross-sectional study, the results were vulnerable to recall bias, and causality may not be inferred, either. Future research should construct a prospective cohort to control for possible confounders and include early childhood experience as a potential influence on the outcomes. Third, although the study was descriptive in nature, the stratification analysis was still vulnerable to sample size and bias. The subgroup sample size is relatively small and after weighting the sample, the confidence intervals were relatively large even though the study was designed to be nationally representative. Fourth, although social events were associated with having depressive symptoms since 2014, more recent data were not available on all the variables in the dataset. We encourage further research incorporating future study waves to capture the more recent trends. Future studies can use regression methods to control for confounding and testing the effect measure modification on both the multiplicative and additive scale.

Conclusion

Combining sex, race, and sexual minority status, we found that Black, sexual minority females had the highest rate of depressive symptoms. Within subgroups of the sexual minority population, people who were not sure about their sexual identities had the highest odds of having depressive symptoms. Furthermore, the mean WBC count was significantly higher in people with depressive symptoms in all combinations of gender and sexual orientation except in male sexual minorities. Future research should investigate the social and biological mechanisms that may contribute to such differences. Moreover, we encourage clinicians and public health workers to pay close attention to high-risk populations with depressive symptoms.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the NHANES repository, https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/Default.aspx [25].

References

  1. Dodge B, Hatzenbuehler ML. Why Are methods and approaches so important for LGBTQ health research? LGBTQ health research: theory, methods, practice. 2020. p. 55–60.

  2. Frost DM, Lehavot K, Meyer IH. Minority stress and physical health among sexual minority individuals. J Behav Med. 2015;38(1):1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hottes TS, Bogaert L, Rhodes AE, Brennan DJ, Gesink D. Lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts among sexual minority adults by study sampling strategies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(5):e1–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshal MP, Dietz LJ, Friedman MS, Stall R, Smith HA, McGinley J, Thoma BC, Murray PJ, D’Augelli AR, Brent DA. Suicidality and depression disparities between sexual minority and heterosexual youth: a meta-analytic review. J Adolesc Health. 2011;49(2):115–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Rice CE, Vasilenko SA, Fish JN, Lanza ST. Sexual minority health disparities: An examination of age-related trends across adulthood in a national cross-sectional sample. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;31:20–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Villarroel MA, Terlizzi EP. Symptoms of depression among adults: United States, 2019: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and. 2020.

  7. Plöderl M, Tremblay P. Mental health of sexual minorities A systematic review. Int Rev Psychiatr. 2015;27(5):367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucassen MF, Stasiak K, Samra R, Frampton CM, Merry SN. Sexual minority youth and depressive symptoms or depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017;51(8):774–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Borgogna NC, McDermott RC, Aita SL, Kridel MM. Anxiety and depression across gender and sexual minorities: Implications for transgender, gender nonconforming, pansexual, demisexual, asexual, queer, and questioning individuals. Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2019;6(1):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Balsam KF, Rothblum ED, Beauchaine TP. Victimization over the life span: a comparison of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and heterosexual siblings. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(3):477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell ST, Franz BT, Driscoll AK. Same-sex romantic attraction and experiences of violence in adolescence. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Herek GM. Hate crimes and stigma-related experiences among sexual minority adults in the United States: prevalence estimates from a national probability sample. J Interpers Violence. 2009;24(1):54–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Plöderl M, Sellmeier M, Fartacek C, Pichler E-M, Fartacek R, Kralovec K. Explaining the suicide risk of sexual minority individuals by contrasting the minority stress model with suicide models. Arch Sex Behav. 2014;43(8):1559–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook SH, Calebs BJ. The integrated attachment and sexual minority stress model: Understanding the role of adult attachment in the health and well-being of sexual minority men. Behav Med. 2016;42(3):164–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bécares L. Health and socio-economic inequalities by sexual orientation among older women in the United Kingdom: findings from the UK household longitudinal study. Ageing Soc. 2021;41(10):2416–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Booker CL, Rieger G, Unger JB. Sexual orientation health inequality: evidence from understanding society, the UK longitudinal household study. Prev Med. 2017;101:126–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller AH, Raison CL. The role of inflammation in depression: from evolutionary imperative to modern treatment target. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(1):22–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bacchini D, Esposito G, Affuso G. Social experience and school bullying. J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2009;19(1):17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bierhaus A, Wolf J, Andrassy M, Rohleder N, Humpert PM, Petrov D, Ferstl R, von Eynatten M, Wendt T, Rudofsky G. A mechanism converting psychosocial stress into mononuclear cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003;100(4):1920–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Diamond LM, Dehlin AJ, Alley J. Systemic inflammation as a driver of health disparities among sexually-diverse and gender-diverse individuals. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021;129: 105215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tan KK, Treharne GJ, Ellis SJ, Schmidt JM, Veale JF. Gender minority stress: A critical review. J Homosex. 2019;67:1471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hammen C. Stress and depression. Ann Rev Clin Psychol (2005). 2005;1(1):293–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Juster R-P, McEwen BS, Lupien SJ. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;35(1):2–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mann A, Chan A, Rohatgi A, Caesar MA, Obedin-Maliver J, Kapp DS. Comparison of depressive symptoms and inflammation between sexual minorities and heterosexuals using NHANES study of 8538 participants. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grant L. The sticking and emigration of white blood cells in inflammation. The inflammatory process. Academic Press; 1973. p. 205–49.

  26. Johnson CL, et al. National health and nutrition examination survey. Analytic guidelines, 1999-2010. 2013.

  27. Cox CS. Plan and operation of the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow up Study, 1987. No. 27. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics. 1992.

  28. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ka-Wing CC, et al. Complete blood count reference interval diagrams derived from NHANES III: stratification by age, sex, and race. Lab Hematol. 2004;10(1):42–53.

  30. Knol MJ, Pestman WR, Grobbee DE. The (mis) use of overlap of confidence intervals to assess effect modification. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(4):253–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Burt VK, Stein K. Epidemiology of depression throughout the female life cycle. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:9–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Deecher D, Andree TH, Sloan D, Schechter LE. From menarche to menopause: exploring the underlying biology of depression in women experiencing hormonal changes. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33(1):3–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brommelhoff JA, Conway K, Merikangas K, Levy BR. Higher rates of depression in women: role of gender bias within the family. J Womens Health. 2004;13(1):69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord. 2003;74(1):5–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Insan N, Weke A, Forrest S, Rankin J. Social determinants of antenatal depression and anxiety among women in South Asia: a systematic review & meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2): e0263760.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Argyriou A, Goldsmith KA, Rimes KA. Mediators of the disparities in depression between sexual minority and heterosexual individuals: a systematic review. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(3):925–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Bar-Anan Y, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT. The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions. Emotion. 2009;9(1):123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Luyckx K, Schwartz SJ, Berzonsky MD, Soenens B, Vansteenkiste M, Smits I, Goossens L. Capturing ruminative exploration: extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. J Res Pers. 2008;42(1):58–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Espelage DL, Aragon SR, Birkett M, Koenig BW. Homophobic teasing, psychological outcomes, and sexual orientation among high school students: What influence do parents and schools have? Sch Psychol Rev. 2008;37(2):202–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Poteat VP, Aragon SR, Espelage DL, Koenig BW. Psychosocial concerns of sexual minority youth: complexity and caution in group differences. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(1):196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Borders A, Guillén LA, Meyer IH. Rumination, sexual orientation uncertainty, and psychological distress in sexual minority university students. Couns Psychol. 2014;42(4):497–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Feinstein BA, Davila J, Yoneda A. Self-concept and self-stigma in lesbians and gay men. Psychol Sex. 2012;3(2):161–77.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Riolo SA, Nguyen TA, Greden JF, King CA. Prevalence of depression by race/ethnicity: findings from the national health and nutrition examination Survey III. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(6):998–1000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Meyer IH, Frost DM. Minority stress and the health of sexual minorities. 2013.

  45. Feagin J. Systemic racism: a theory of oppression: Routledge. 2013.

  46. Williams DR, Lawrence J, Davis B. Racism and health: evidence and needed research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore MR. Intersectionality and the study of black, sexual minority women. Gender Soc. 2012;26(1):33–9.

  48. McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2005;30(3):1771–800.

  49. Austin PC, Hux JE. A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36(1):194–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schenker N, Gentleman JF. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2001;55(3):182–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Crawford JR, Garthwaite PH. Comparing patients’ predicted test scores from a regression equation with their obtained scores: a significance test and point estimate of abnormality with accompanying confidence limits. Neuropsychology. 2006;20(3):259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Inman HF, Bradley EL Jr. The overlapping coefficient as a measure of agreement between probability distributions and point estimation of the overlap of two normal densities. Commun Stat Theory Methods. 1989;18(10):3851–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mittal N, Bhandari M, Kumbhare D. A tale of confusion from overlapping confidence intervals. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;98(1):81–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bollen J, Trick L, Llewellyn D, Dickens C. The effects of acute inflammation on cognitive functioning and emotional processing in humans: a systematic review of experimental studies. J Psychosom Res. 2017;94:47–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dooley LN, Kuhlman KR, Robles TF, Eisenberger NI, Craske MG, Bower JE. The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;94:219–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Cochran SD, Sullivan JG, Mays VM. Prevalence of mental disorders, psychological distress, and mental health services use among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(1):53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tilcsik A. Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. Am J Sociol. 2011;117(2):586–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilson PA, Yoshikawa H. Experiences of and responses to social discrimination among Asian and Pacific Islander gay men: Their relationship to HIV risk. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(1):68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jennings L, Barcelos C, McWilliams C, Malecki K. Inequalities in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) health and health care access and utilization in Wisconsin. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2019;14: 100864.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Kreps GL, Peterkin AD, Willes K, Allen M, Manning J, Ross K, Scholl JC, Bell GC, Gonzales G, Moltz R. Health care disparities and the LGBT population: Lexington Books. 2014.

  61. Zeeman L, Sherriff N, Browne K, McGlynn N, Mirandola M, Gios L, Davis R, Sanchez-Lambert J, Aujean S, Pinto N. A review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) health and healthcare inequalities. Eur J Pub Health. 2019;29(5):974–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was not supported by a specific grant from any funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Behavior Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA

    Junjie Lu

  2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    Jiarui Yang

  3. Department of Tropical Medicine, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, USA

    Jingyang Liang

  4. Depression Clinical & Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    David Mischoulon & Maren Nyer

Authors
  1. Junjie Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiarui Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jingyang Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. David Mischoulon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maren Nyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.L. drafted the manuscript and was a major contributor in writing. J.Y., J.L. performed the data analysis and drew the Fig. 1. J.Y.L. designed the Tables 1-4 and performed the data analysis. M.N. and D.M. drafted and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maren Nyer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was purely observational and only used publicly available secondary data. All observations were de-identified. The NHANES Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the NHANES program and the NCHS Research Ethics Review Board (ERB) after 2003. No other IRB was required for this study. For detailed IRB approval, please visit: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

 Directed acyclic graph for the study. 

Additional file 2:

 Supplementary Table. The association betweensexual minority status/sexual orientation groups and PHQ-9 scores, NHANES 2005to 2014.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, J., Yang, J., Liang, J. et al. The descriptive analysis of depressive symptoms and White Blood Cell (WBC) count between the sexual minorities and heterosexual identifying individuals in a nationally representative sample: 2005–2014. BMC Public Health 23, 294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14847-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14847-6

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us