Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Determinants of maternal health four weeks after delivery: cross-sectional findings from the KUNO-kids health study

BMC Public Health volume 21, Article number: 1676 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to examine the interaction of a multitude of socio-economic, lifestyle, environmental, psychosocial and birth related determinants and their effect on maternal health four weeks after delivery.

Methods

We used data from a German birth cohort study, the KUNO-Kids health study. Social determinants, as well as the self-rated maternal health and the physical and mental health status of mothers (indicated by means of the SF-12-questionnaire) were assessed through standardized questionnaires and personal interviews right after delivery and four weeks later. Linear regression models were calculated to determine the relationship between influencing factors and health outcomes.

Results

1428 women were included in the analysis. Maternal self-rated health showed significant positive associations with breastfeeding (B (regression coefficient) 2.67; 0.86–4.48 (95% Confidence interval)) and estimating one’s child as rather healthy (B 0.27; 0.19–0.34) and negative associations with social and emotional strains (B -3.50; -5.11- -1.88), obesity (B -2.56; -4.69- -0.42), having experienced a C-section (B -1.73; -3.23- -0.23), a positive history of somatic diseases (B -2.14; -3.53- -0.74), parental stress (B -0.39; -0.66- -0.11) and education of more than ten years (B -2.42; -3.95- -0.90).

Maternal physical health status showed significant negative associations with age (B -0.13; -0.25- -0.01), employment before maternity leave (B -1.90; -3.59- -0.21), social and emotional strains (B -1.50; -2.67- -0.34), parental stress (B -0.28; -0.45- -0.12), C-section (B -4.06; -5.12- -2.99), having the first child (B -2.03; -3.09- -0.97) and a history of somatic diseases (B -2.00; -2.99- -1.01).

Maternal mental health status showed significant positive associations with education of more than 10 years (B 2.27; 0.98–3.56) and a high level of social support (B 1.20; 0.06–2.34), while social and emotional strains (B -4.16; -5.48- -2.84) and parental stress (B -0.70; -0.92- -0.47) were negatively associated.

Conclusions

We identified important protective factors for maternal health four weeks after delivery, such as a high level of social support. However, parental stress and social and emotional strains in particular seem to have a negative influence on maternal health. These findings have public health relevance.

Peer Review reports

Background

Several studies have investigated risk factors for poor psychological and physiologic health status of women during pregnancy and after delivery [1, 2]. Studies that focus on maternal health during pregnancy could show that there are significant negative associations between educational and occupation level and the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women [3], as well as between poverty and race and the occurrence of urinary tract infection, placenta disorders and preterm rupture of the membranes [4]. But not only the maternal health status during pregnancy but also the health status after delivery has been investigated earlier. Studies showed that higher maternal educational level and higher maternal occupational class as well as regular physical activity were associated with better maternal and better child health [5,6,7,8]. A study in Minnesota demonstrated that both physical and mental health problems 11 weeks postpartum (measured by the Short Form Questionnaire “SF-12” [9]) occurred more often in women with low coworker support and high job stress [10]. As a result, in particular the mental health status of mothers is considered at least as important as their physical health status. It could be shown that partnership and parity status, educational status, monthly income and residential property status were factors influencing depressive symptoms in mothers after delivery [11]. In addition, a study demonstrated that having children with chronic health conditions or developmental disabilities or activity limitations leads to a higher risk for adverse maternal mental health outcomes after delivery [12].

In general, previous studies focused mainly on one specific predictor for health outcomes whereas relatively little is known about the joint effects of numerous social determinants in relation to maternal health. In this study we use a comprehensive concept of health, including general, physical and mental health. A simultaneous consideration of socio-economic, environmental, lifestyle, psychosocial and birth related factors might help to identify women at risk for poor general, physical and mental health status four weeks after delivery. The current work extends prior work by examining the health status of mothers as well as a range of socioeconomic, environmental, lifestyle, psychosocial and birth and child related factors influencing maternal health outcomes using data from a prospective German birth cohort study.

Methods

Study design and study population

The study is based on data from the KUNOFootnote 1-kids health study, a population-based, prospective birth cohort study conducted at the hospital St. Hedwig in Regensburg, Germany. St. Hedwig is located in Regensburg (153,000 inhabitants). The catchment area comprises the city of Regensburg as well as its mostly rural adjacent regions. Unemployment rates are low [13]. Being a tertiary perinatal center, the proportion of high-risk births is large. Rationale and design of the study have been reported in detail elsewhere [14]. For our study all women who came to St. Hedwig for the delivery of their baby (or babies) from June 2015 until June 2018 were asked to participate. Overall response was about 33% [14]. Participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained for each case. Participating women were asked to complete a standardized questionnaire in addition to a physical examination of the child. Researchers were trained to conduct interviews during a pilot study, using data not included in the final analysis. Exclusion criteria were inadequate German language skills (no basic German language skills for the comprehension of study procedures existent) and underage mother (< 18 years). The study was approved by the ethics board of the University of Regensburg (file number: 14–101-0347).

Instruments

Assessment of social determinants

Maternal social determinants were assessed through a standardized questionnaire completed by mothers and, in addition, assessed by the KUNO-kids study team shortly after delivery. In addition, follow-up questionnaires were sent to the mothers four weeks after delivery. Socioeconomic determinants including age, family status, type of medical insurance, maternal education and employment before maternity leave, occupational group and maternal nationality were assessed within two days after delivery, as well as the level of social support and lifestyle factors, such as the level of physical activity, diet, height and weight before pregnancy, the number of doctors’ consultations during pregnancy and the history of psychiatric and somatic diseases. Further, birth related determinants, including birth mode, preterm delivery and season of birth were assessed right after delivery. Psychosocial factors such as the subjective position within society, the level of parental stress and social and emotional strains were assessed four weeks after delivery, as well as environmental and lifestyle factors, such as the housing situation, the drinking and smoking habits and secondhand smoke exposure. Child related determinants, including a visual analogue scale of the estimated child health “VAS child health”Footnote 2 and the factor “breastfeeding” were also assessed four weeks after delivery.

We used the German version of the Mac-Arthur scale [15] to examine the mother’s subjective position within society. The level of social support (as experienced by the mother) was measured using the standardized short form social support questionnaire “F-SozU K-14”Footnote 3 [16] [17]. It comprises the following domains: emotional and practical support, social integration, perceived social support and social strain. Every item can be answered on a scale of one (total rejection of the statement) to five (total agreement with the statement) out of which a mean score is calculated. To determine parental stress we used three scales of the EBIFootnote 4 [18] a German version of the parenting stress index (PSI): parental competence, personal limitations and parent-child bond were each assessed with four items with a range of one to five points. Adding up the points for each domain results in a possible range of four to twenty points, with a higher score indicating a higher stress level. A total score was not calculated, as we only used three domains out of the original 12 domains.

For detailed information on all items, that have been used to assess social determinants see Table 1 and additional file 1.

Table 1 Assessment of socioeconomic, lifestyle, environmental, psychosocial and child and birth-related determinants
Full size table

Assessment of health outcome

Self-rated maternal health

Self-rated health was assessed four weeks after delivery on a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 with 100 points indicating full health. The VAS is part of the EQ-5DFootnote 5 [19].

Questionnaire assessed maternal health

Physical and mental health status of the mothers was determined by means of the “SF-12-questionnaire” four weeks after delivery [9]. This questionnaire is a validated tool that reflects the overall health-related quality of life [20]. The SF-12 asks how they would describe their general health status (excellent, very good, good, fair, poor). They were also asked if they experienced any new limitations with moderate daily activities, if they had difficulties accomplishing daily activities because of emotional or physical health problems, if they experienced any pain that would interfere with their normal work and how often they felt calm, energetic or disheartened. It was also asked how often physical health or emotional problems interfered with social activities during the last four weeks. SF-12 scores for both the physical and the mental component core range between 0 and 100 points with scores above and below 50 being above and below the average German population. A score above 50 represents a better physical or mental health than the population norm, respectively [21].

Statistical analyses

The baseline characteristics of the study population were summarized descriptively. Linear regression was conducted to determine the relationship between health outcomes and potentially influencing factors. B-values and standardized ß-values were generated. Each variable with a p-value < 0.20 in univariable analysis was entered into a multivariable model to avoid missing variables that may show significant effects in multivariable analysis despite evident lack of associations in univariable analysis. For multivariable analysis the significance level was set to a p-value of < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA 2015). Mothers with missing data were excluded from the respective analyses.

Results

Social and health characteristics of the sample of mothers are shown in Table 2. A total of 1428 of the 2788 women (51%) had completed the interview and the questionnaires right after delivery in addition to the questionnaire four weeks later and were therefore included in the analysis. Four weeks after delivery, the overall average self-rated health of mothers was 86.17 points (SD: 11.90), physical and mental component scores of SF-12 were 47.63 points (SD: 8.22) and 47.28 (SD: 10.64), respectively. The scores ranged from 19.02 to 68.53 (physical component scale) and from 7.87 to 65.84 (mental component scale).

Table 2 Characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Univariable analysis

Results of univariable analyses are presented in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3 Associations between self-rated health and potential determinants in mothers: results of univariable linear regression analysis
Full size table
Table 4 Associations between SF-12-PCS and -MCS and potential determinants in mothers: results of univariable linear regression analysis
Full size table

Self-rated health

Breastfeeding, the mother’s subjective position within society, the level of social support (F-Sozu) and VAS child health showed significant positive associations with mothers’ self-rated health four weeks after delivery. Social and emotional strains, obesity, having experienced a C-section, a history of both psychiatric and somatic diseases, parental stress (PSI) and the number of doctors’ consultations during pregnancy were inversely associated.

SF-12-physical component scale (PCS)

The mother’s age, education of more than ten years, social and emotional strains, parental stress (PSI), humidity stains inside the house or flat, number of doctors’ consultations during pregnancy, having experienced a C-section, having the first child and a positive history of psychiatric and somatic diseases were negatively associated with the PCS-12 four weeks after delivery.

SF-12-mental component scale (MCS)

We found significant positive associations between mother’s age, health insurance, education more than ten years, mother’s subjective position within society, social support (F-Sozu), VAS child health and the MCS-12 four weeks after delivery: The older the mothers, the higher their subjective position within society, the higher their social support and the healthier mothers estimated their child, the better was their mental health status. Also having health insurance and having had an education of more than ten years showed better mental health status. Employment before maternity leave, migration background, social and emotional strains, parental stress (PSI), a history of somatic and psychiatric diseases and having the first child were negatively associated.

Multivariable analysis

Self-rated health

Table 5 shows significant associations between determinants and the self-rated health of mothers four weeks after delivery. Breastfeeding and VAS child health remained as significant positive predictors in the multivariable analysis. Social and emotional strains, two of three domains of the PSI (personal limitations, parental competence), obesity, having experienced a C-section, and a positive history of somatic diseases were negatively associated with self-rated maternal health. In addition, education of more than ten years was also negatively associated with self-rated health of mothers.

Table 5 Associations between self-rated health and potential determinants in mothers: results of multivariable linear regression analysis
Full size table

SF-12-physical component scale (PCS)

Age, employment before maternity leave, social and emotional strains, one PSI domain (personal limitations), C-section, having the first child and a history of somatic diseases were negatively associated with the PCS-12. For detailed information see Table 6.

Table 6 Associations between SF-12-PCS and potential determinants in mothers: Results of multivariable linear regression analysis
Full size table

SF-12-mental component scale (MCS)

Education of more than 10 years and a solid social environment, indicated by a high score in the F-Sozu, showed significant positive associations with MCS-12. Social and emotional strains as well as two of three PSI domains (personal limitations and parental competence) showed significant negative associations with the MCS-12 (Table 7).

Table 7 Association between SF-12-MCS and potential determinants in mothers: Results of multivariable linear regression analysis
Full size table

Discussion

Summary of main findings

The aim of our study was to provide a contribution to the literature on how a multitude of socio-economic, lifestyle, environmental, psychosocial and birth related determinants effects maternal health. We identified risk factors for maternal health outcomes four weeks after delivery, especially social and emotional strains, parental stress and education of more than 10 years. We could also determine positive factors for maternal health, such as a high subjective position within society or a high score in the VAS child.

Comparison of findings with previous studies

Some of our findings are consistent with earlier studies, emphasizing the importance of a stable social environment for mothers’ health [1, 6]. Dennis et al. identified a lack of social support as a risk factor for mothers’ self-rated health. Also having had a C-section (or forceps or vacuum delivery), no or little physical activity and low income were negatively associated [1]. Some of our findings on the other hand seem to be surprising in the context of prior work. Education more than ten years appears to have a significant negative influence on one’s self-rated health. Former studies show that the self-rated health varies with perception of what constitutes good health and with expectations regarding one’s own health [22]. It is assumed that more highly educated individuals are better informed of treatment options and are less tolerant of a given health condition [23]. A study in Germany in 2010 showed that the higher the educational level of women, the higher the number of doctor’s consultations [24]. An explanation for this relation might be that the more knowledge mothers have, the more they tend to be worried about any complications and therefore report a lower self-rated health. Our finding warrants further investigation though.

We took the physical and mental component scale of the SF-12-questionnaire to picture the physical and mental health status of the mothers. Previous studies using the SF-12 found that job stress, amongst others, was a negative predictor for mental health status of mothers [10]. Interestingly, we found that employment before maternity leave was associated with a lower physical health status in mothers. This finding might inform a reconsideration of maternity protection in Germany.

Strengths and limitations

Our work adds valuable new findings to already existing studies and knowledge about maternal health. First, we identified several potential risk factors for maternal health that have not been the focus of previous research, including a high maternal education or employment before maternity leave. To the best of our knowledge it is one of the first studies investigating the simultaneous influence of a multitude of factors, not focusing on only specific factors. It is important to understand how socioeconomic, environmental, lifestyle, psychosocial and birth related factors together influence maternal health outcomes. Health is a complex multidimensional construct. In our study we used a comprehensive approach to describe maternal health four weeks after delivery including the self-rated health of mothers on a visual analogue scale and the physical and mental component scales of the SF-12, a well-established and validated tool to measure health-related quality of life [9].

Previous studies tend to dichotomize self-rated health into two groups of poor/fair self-rated health and good/excellent self-rated health or use other items to describe it, like the Personal Health Scale (PHS) or the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) [1, 25]. The visual analogue scale we used with a response range from 0 to 100 offers very fine nuances and prevents respondents of being bound to predetermined categories [26].

Some limitations of this study must be considered.

All of our data are self-reported and therefore subject to recall bias. To overcome this limitation, mothers were interviewed shortly after delivery and again after four weeks in order to potentially improve the mothers’ recall of events. All members of the study team were trained to conduct the interview in a professional and sensitive way. Still information may have been misreported due to social desirability bias [27].

The response rate in our study is 33% (investigated in detail during a 2.5 months’ time period) [14]. This seems low, compared to other earlier German birth cohort studies, such as the ULM-Spatz birth cohort study with a response rate of 48% or the GINIplus birth cohort study with a response rate of 55% [28]. Still, response rates between studies vary. Other birth cohort studies in Europe, such as the Danish national birth cohort study have achieved a similar response rate of 35% [29] and also data from the currently ongoing German National Cohort NAKO suggests that participation rates in population based studies are low [30]. In the KUNO-kids study potential differences between respondents and non-respondents have been investigated. The most frequent reasons for non-participation were insufficient German language skills, mothers’ perception that the study procedures are associated with too much effort and lack of interest [14]. For the analysis of determinants of maternal health we investigated differences between the initial sample of mothers who provided written informed consent and participated in the baseline interview and the final study population (who also returned the four-weeks-questionnaire). The rate of single mothers and mothers with migration background in the final study sample is lower compared to the original sample. Educational status and rate of employment before maternity leave in the final sample on the other hand are higher compared to the original study population (see additional file 2). Compared to data from registration offices our final study population has a lower rate of single mothers and mothers with migration background [13]. However, educational level in our study is similar to the educational level of women aged between 25 and 35 years in Germany [31] and child and birth related characteristics in our study reflect the average perinatal statistics in Bavaria with similar ratios of C-section or preterm delivery [32]. In summary, we cannot deny the presence of selection bias in our study. In the context of prior birth cohort studies this observation does not seem too surprising [33] as people from a higher social class tend to participate in health studies more often than people from a lower social class.

Conclusion

We noticed that some risk factors for maternal health become more and more common, such as a high educational level for women, employment before maternity leave and high-aged primipara. As it could be shown in our study, these factors are associated with lower maternal self-rated health and a lower physical health status four weeks after delivery which underlines the importance of reinvestigating these relations. It appears interesting that we found an association between higher education and a lower self-rated health. This is against all previous findings and should definitively lead to more studies examining this relation.

By investigating several factors and their influence on maternal health the importance of mothers’ social support became clear. Social and emotional strains as well as parental stress seem to be negatively associated with both the self-rated health and the physical and mental health status of mothers. In this context the enforcement of social support networks, as well as stable family structures seem important. Concretely, it could reduce maternal stress and strains to establish family-friendly work concepts. Particularly in rural areas there is the need to extend social support offers, such as educational counseling or cry baby clinics. This could improve maternal health outcomes in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. KUNO = Kinder-Uniklinik Ostbayern = children’s university hospital in East Bavaria

  2. VAS child health: visual analogue scale of the estimated child health

  3. F-SozU K-14: Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (Kurzform 14) = German social support questionnaire with 14 questions

  4. EBI: Elterliches Belastungsinventar = German version of the Parenting Stress Index

  5. EQ-5D: a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Group

Abbreviations

EBI:

Elterliches Belastungsinventar = German version of the Parenting Stress Index

EQ-5D:

a standardized health-related quality of life questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Group

F-Sozu:

Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung = German social support questionnaire

K-14:

Kurzform 14 = questionnaire with 14 questions

KUNO:

Kinder Uniklinik Ostbayern

PSI:

Parenting Stress Index

SF-12:

Short form questionnaire

MCS:

mental component scale

PCS:

physical component scale

VAS:

visual analogue scale

References

  1. Haas JS, Jackson RA, Fuentes-Afflick E, Stewart AL, Dean ML, Brawarsky P, et al. Changes in the health status of women during and after pregnancy. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40097.x .

  2. Otchet F, Carey MS, Adam L. General health and psychological symptom status in pregnancy and the puerperium: what is normal? Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(6):935-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00439-1.

  3. Mekonnen FA, Ambaw YA, Neri GT. Socio-economic determinants of anemia in pregnancy in north Shoa zone, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202734 .

  4. Whitehead NS, Callaghan W, Johnson C, Williams L. Racial, ethnic, and economic disparities in the prevalence of pregnancy complications. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13(2):198–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0344-2 .

  5. da Silva SG, Ricardo LI, Evenson KR, Hallal PC. Leisure-time physical activity in pregnancy and maternal-child health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. Sports Med. 2017;47(2):295–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0565-2 .

  6. Dennis EF, Webb DA, Lorch SA, Mathew L, Bloch JR, Culhane JF. Subjective social status and maternal health in a low income urban population. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(4):834–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0791-z .

  7. Kahn M, Robien K, DiPietro L. Maternal leisure-time physical activity and risk of preterm birth: a systematic review of the literature. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(7):796–807. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0495 .

  8. Larrañaga I, Santa-Marina L, Begiristain H, Machón M, Vrijheid M, Casas M, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in health, habits and self-care during pregnancy in Spain. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(7):1315–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-012-1134-4 .

  9. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-item short-form health survey. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 .

  10. McGovern P, Dowd B, Gjerdingen D, Dagher R, Ukestad L, McCaffrey D, et al. Mothers' health and work-related factors at 11 weeks postpartum. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(6):519–27. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.751 .

  11. Hein A, Rauh C, Engel A, Häberle L, Dammer U, Voigt F, et al. Socioeconomic status and depression during and after pregnancy in the Franconian maternal health evaluation studies (FRAMES). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(4):755–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-3046-y .

  12. Garbarski D, Witt WP. Child health, maternal marital and socioeconomic factors, and maternal health. J Fam Issues. 2013;34(4):484–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12443052 .

  13. Stadt Regensburg. Statistisches Jahrbuch: Ausgabe 2019. 2019. www.statistik.regensburg.de.

  14. Brandstetter S, Toncheva AA, Niggel J, Wolff C, Gran S, Seelbach-Göbel B, et al. KUNO-kids birth cohort study: rationale, design, and cohort description. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2019;6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-018-0088-z .

  15. Hoebel J, Müters S, Kuntz B, Lange C, Lampert T. Messung des subjektiven sozialen status in der Gesundheitsforschung mit einer deutschen version der MacArthur scale. [measuring subjective social status in health research with a German version of the MacArthur scale]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015;58(7):749–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-015-2166-x .

  16. Fydrich T, Sommer G, Brähler E. F-Sozu. Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fydrich T, Sommer G, Tydecks S, Brähler E. Fragebogen zur sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU): Normierung der Kurzform (K-14) social support questionnaire (F-SozU): standardization of short form (K-14). Z Med Psychol. 2009;18:43-8.

  18. Tröster H. Eltern-Belastungs-Inventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cabases J, Szende A, Janssen B. Self-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective based on EQ-5D: Introduction. s.l.: Springer; 2014.

  20. Office of Public Health Assessment. Health Status in Utah: The Medical Outcomes Study SF-12 (2001 Utah health status survey report). Salt Lake City: Utah Department of Health; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Matthias Nübling. Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Berechnung der körperlichen und psychischen Summenskalen auf Basis der SOEP - Version des SF 12 (Algorithmus). 2006. https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.44987.de/diw_datadoc_2006-016.pdf.

  22. Thomas D, Frankenberg E. The Measurement and Interpretation of Health in Social Surveys. Murray C, Salomon J, Mathers C, Lopez A (eds) Measurement of the Global Burden of Disease, Chapter 8.2. 2001.

  23. d'Uva TB, O'Donnell O, van Doorslaer E. Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37(6):1375–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn146 .

  24. Rattay P, Butschalowsky H, Rommel A, Prütz F, Jordan S, Nowossadeck E, et al. Inanspruchnahme der ambulanten und stationären medizinischen Versorgung in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland (DEGS1). [Utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56(5-6):832–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-013-1665-x .

  25. Zubaran C, Foresti K, Schumacher MV, Amoretti AL, Thorell MR, Müller LC. The correlation between postpartum depression and health status. Matern Child Health J. 2010;14(5):751–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0512-z .

  26. Klimek L, Bergmann K-C, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, et al. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care: Position Paper of the German Society of Allergology (AeDA) and the German Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), ENT Section, in collaboration with the working group on Clinical Immunology, Allergology and Environmental Medicine of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNOKHC). Allergo J Int. 2017;26:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-016-0006-7 .

  27. Latkin CA, Edwards C, Davey-Rothwell MA, Tobin KE. The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addict Behav. 2017;73:133–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.05.005 .

  28. Heinrich J, Brüske I, Schnappinger M, Standl M, Flexeder C, Thiering E, et al. Die zwei deutschen Geburtskohorten GINIplus und LISAplus. [Two German Birth Cohorts: GINIplus and LISAplus]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2012;55(6-7):864–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1485-4 .

  29. Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sørensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, et al. The Danish National Birth Cohort--its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001;29(4):300–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948010290040201 .

  30. Schipf S, Schöne G, Schmidt B, Günther K, Stübs G, Greiser KH, et al. Die Basiserhebung der NAKO Gesundheitsstudie: Teilnahme an den Untersuchungsmodulen, Qualitätssicherung und Nutzung von Sekundärdaten. [the baseline assessment of the German National Cohort (NAKO Gesundheitsstudie): participation in the examination modules, quality assurance, and the use of secondary data]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2020;63(3):254–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-020-03093-z.

  31. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Statistisches Jahrbuch 2018.

  32. Bayerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Qualitätssicherung in der stationären Versorgung. Geburtshilfe Auswertung 2018: Modul 16/1.

  33. Müller M. Zusammenhang von Nierenfunktion und Serumharnsäure der Mutter mit dem Geburtsgewicht beim Neugeborenen - Ergebnisse einer epidemiologischen Geburtskohortenstudie [Dissertation]. Ulm: Universität Ulm; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all families who participate in the KUNO-kids birth cohort study as well as all medical students, nurses, midwives, physicians, and researchers who facilitated the recruitment of participants and data assessment.

Further, we thank all members of the KUNO-kids study group:

Petra Arndt (ZNL Transfercenter of Neuroscience and Learning, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany), Andrea Baessler (Department of Internal Medicine II, Regensburg University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany), Mark Berneburg (Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Stephan Böse-O’Reilly (Institute and Clinic for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany), Romuald Brunner (Clinic of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Bezirksklinikum Regensburg (medbo), Regensburg, Germany), Wolfgang Buchalla (Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Sara Fill Malfertheiner (Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Hedwig, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), André Franke (Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany), Sebastian Häusler (Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology St. Hedwig, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Iris Heid (Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Caroline Herr (Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL), Munich, Germany), Wolfgang Högler (Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria), Sebastian Kerzel (Department of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergy, University Children’s Hospital Regensburg, St. Hedwig Campus, Regensburg, Germany), Michael Koller (Center for Clinical Studies, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Michael Leitzmann (Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), David Rothfuß (City of Regensburg, Coordinating Center for Early Interventions, Regensburg, Germany), Wolfgang Rösch (Department of Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center, Regensburg, Germany), Bianca Schaub (Pediatric Allergology, Dept of Pediatrics, Dr. von Hauner Children’s Hospital, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany), Bernhard H.F. Weber (Institute of Human Genetics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany), Stephan Weidinger (Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany) and Sven Wellmann (Children’s Hospital St. Hedwig, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany).

Funding

The KUNO-kids health study was funded by research grants of the EU (HEALS: 603946). Further financial support was provided by the University Children’s Hospital Regensburg (KUNO-Clinics) and the clinic ‘St Hedwig’ (Hospital ‘Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg’). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

    Veronika Pinker, Christina Tischer & Christian Apfelbacher

  2. Medical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Veronika Pinker & Christian Apfelbacher

  3. University Children’s Hospital Regensburg (KUNO) University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Susanne Brandstetter, Michael Melter & Michael Kabesch

  4. Member of the Research and Development Campus Regensburg (WECARE), Hospital St. Hedwig of the Order of St. John, Regensburg, Germany

    Susanne Brandstetter, Michael Melter, Michael Kabesch & Christian Apfelbacher

  5. Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology at St. Hedwig’s hospital, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

    Birgit Seelbach-Göbel

Authors
  1. Veronika Pinker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Brandstetter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christina Tischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Birgit Seelbach-Göbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Melter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Kabesch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Christian Apfelbacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

The Kuno-kids study group

  • Andreas Ambrosch
  • , Petra Arndt
  • , Andrea Baessler
  • , Mark Berneburg
  • , Stephan Böse-O’Reilly
  • , Romuald Brunner
  • , Wolfgang Buchalla
  • , Sara Fill Malfertheiner
  • , André Franke
  • , Sebastian Häusler
  • , Iris Heid
  • , Caroline Herr
  • , Wolfgang Högler
  • , Sebastian Kerzel
  • , Michael Koller
  • , Michael Leitzmann
  • , David Rothfuß
  • , Wolfgang Rösch
  • , Bianca Schaub
  • , Bernhard H. F. Weber
  • , Stephan Weidinger
  •  & Sven Wellmann

Contributions

VP contributed to data collection, interpreted the study findings, drafted the manuscript and critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. CA, SB, CT contributed to the design of the study, helped interpret the study findings, critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. MK designed the study, critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted. MM, BS critically evaluated the manuscript and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronika Pinker.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics board of the University of Regensburg (file number: 14–101-0347). Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Items, that have been developed for the KUNO-kids study

Additional file 2.

Characteristics of the study population compared to the initial sample (mothers who participated only in the baseline interview)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinker, V., Brandstetter, S., Tischer, C. et al. Determinants of maternal health four weeks after delivery: cross-sectional findings from the KUNO-kids health study. BMC Public Health 21, 1676 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11667-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11667-y

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us