Skip to main content
Download PDF

Adhere to the Chinese dietary guidelines associated with better subjective well-being: evidence from a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 445 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Subjective well-being (SWB) plays an essential role in general health. Although beneficial effects of selected micronutrients and foods on SWB have been reported, they do not reflect the impact of the habitual diet on SWB. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the association between adherence to the Chinese Dietary Guidelines (CDG) with SWB.

Methods

This study combined a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation. The cross-sectional survey was conducted on 1,433 students from 8 universities in southern China between October and November 2020. The daily diary investigation was conducted in November 2022, collecting 10-day daily data from 115 students at two universities in southern China over ten consecutive days, resulting in 1,020 valid matched daily responses. Adherence to the CDG was assessed by the China Prime Diet Quality Score (CPDQS), SWB was measured by the Index of Well-being (IWB) and the Affect Valuation Index (AVI). Correlation analysis, multiple regression analyses, and hierarchical regression were conducted to examine the associations of adherence to the CDG with its components, and SWB.

Results

The cross-sectional survey revealed significant predictors of SWB, including adherence to the CDG (β = 0.24, p<0.001) and its components: cereals and tubers (β = 0.07, p = 0.024), vegetables and fruits (β = 0.11, p<0.001), dairy/soy/nuts (β = 0.11, p = 0.002), and condiments and alcoholic beverages (β = 0.08, p = 0.002). The daily diary investigation showed positive associations between adherence to the CDG (β = 0.19, p<0.001), and its components: vegetables and fruits (β = 0.11, p = 0.001), dairy/soy/nuts (β = 0.06, p = 0.009), animal source food (β = 0.06, p = 0.026), and condiments and alcoholic beverages (β = 0.07, p = 0.026), with higher levels of daily SWB.

Conclusions

Adherence to healthy dietary patterns such as the CDG, rather than focusing on individual components in isolation, is associated with better SWB. Furthermore, the consumption of CDG components had an impact on SWB, although the specific effects varied between the two studies. This study offers modest evidence supporting the role of the CDG in promoting positive mental health.

Peer Review reports

Background

Received wisdom as well as a large literature indicate that lifestyle has a substantial and highly significant impact on the health of individuals [1,2,3]. Among them, diet is a modifiable lifestyle behavior that contributes significantly to human health, accounting for 14% of its influence [4]. It surpasses medical factors (7%) and ranks second only to genetic factors (16%) [4]. Healthy dietary habits play a significant role in promoting mental and physical health [5], as well as in the prevention and treatment of non-communicable diseases [6]. Conversely, an unreasonable diet structure may lead to increasingly unhealthy conditions, including obesity [7], high blood pressure [8], high cholesterol [9], diabetes [10], and cancer [11].

In addition to physical functioning, health and quality of life benefits, diet is among the most important modifiable risk factors for mental health [12, 13]. An increasing number of studies have shown that various nutrients, food items, diet quality, and dietary patterns affect mental health [14, 15]. A systematic review has demonstrated that consuming fresh vegetables and fruits have been associated with a lower risk of depression, while sugar-sweetened beverages has been associated with a higher risk of depression [16]. Moreover, some research evidence points to the association between adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern and positive mental health outcomes including reduced anxiety, stress, and depression [17]. However, aside from exploring the relationship between diet and mental disturbances, the influences of a healthy diet on positive psychological functioning have not been extensively examined.

Subjective well-being (SWB) has consistently garnered scholarly attention and is frequently a sought-after state for individuals [18, 19]. SWB is a multifaceted construct, distinguishable into two primary components: affective and cognitive well-being [20,21,22]. Affective well-being pertains to the manifestation of positive affect (e.g., happiness) and the absence of negative affect (e.g., depressive mood). Cognitive well-being involves the cognitive assessment of overall life satisfaction and specific life domains. SWB is not only widely recognized as a crucial measure of a population’s overall health [23], but also plays a vital role in fostering satisfying interpersonal relationships, enhancing quality of life, and contributing to social productivity [21, 24]. While there is an essential role of SWB in overall health, there have been limited studies investigating its relationship with diet. Furthermore, unlike mental disorders such as depression and anxiety, well-being is less subject to heritable influences [25]. Therefore, modifying dietary factors is more likely to facilitate the enhancement of individual well-being [26]. A growing literature indicates that the consumption of healthy foods is associated with elevated levels of SWB [27,28,29]. An intervention study suggests that an 8-week period of providing participants with the recommended types and amounts of vegetables in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans led to an increase in SWB [30]. Additionally, the findings of a 30-day online survey indicated that increasing the daily intake of fruits and vegetables was associated with improved positive emotions, ultimately leading to a better mood [31]. On the other hand, the consumption of unhealthy foods, such as fast food and soft drinks, can indirectly undermine happiness [32].

Beyond single foods or nutrients [30, 33], examining overall dietary patterns is more likely to offer a comprehensive explanation of diet-SWB relations. It is widely recognized that individuals do not consume isolated nutrients but rather consume meals consisting of a diverse range of foods that contain complex combinations of interactive nutrients [34, 35]. Whole-diet analyses reflect real-life scenarios [26], depict a comprehensive picture of the interplay between foods and nutrients [36], and enable researchers to consider interactions among various nutrients [37, 38]. Thus, dietary patterns may be more predictive of SWB than foods or nutrients in isolation. Preliminary evidence indicates that healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet, have been associated with enhanced subjective well-being [39, 40]. The Mediterranean diet is characterized by a substantial consumption of vegetables, legumes, fruits, nuts, cereals, and olive oil, with a moderate intake of wine, meat, fish, eggs, and dairy products, and a low intake of red meat, processed foods, and sugary drinks [41, 42].

To our knowledge, there has been limited exploration of the relationship between healthy dietary patterns and SWB, with the majority of the studies in the literature solely focused on the Mediterranean diet and limited by cross-sectional study design [39, 43]. Given the regional differences in diets around the world [44], conventional healthy dietary patterns such as the Mediterranean diet or Healthy Eating Index may not adequately align with the dietary structure of Chinese residents. The Chinese Dietary Guidelines (CDG) serves as official dietary guidelines specifically developed to promote healthy and habitual food choices, reduce the risk of chronic diseases, and enhance public health [45]. The CDG recommends a diet that emphasizes whole grains, vegetables, and fruits while advocating for moderate consumption of meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products [45]. Previous research has extensively assessed the effects of adhering to the Chinese Dietary Guidelines (CDG) on physical and mental health [34, 46, 47]. However, the relationship between CDG adherence and SWB remains unexplored.

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the association between adherence to the CDG and its components with evaluative SWB using a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation. Considering the aforementioned health benefits of the healthy dietary pattern, we hypothesize that CDG adherence is also positively associated with SWB in the general population. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of ethics committee at Applied Psychology Program, Faculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University (2022010). Written informed consent form was obtained from all of the participants. The procedures conducted in this study adhered to the ethical standards set by the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and regional) and conformed to the principles outlined in the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and all subsequent revisions.

Materials and methods

Study 1—the cross-sectional survey

Participants and procedure

From October to November 2022, a study was conducted among 1,452 Chinese college students from 8 public universities located in southern China. The study employed a convenience sampling method for data collection, utilizing a combination of online and on-site surveys. Investigators received standardized and uniform training, attaining proficiency in guiding language, questionnaire content, and precautions. Surveys were then conducted both online and on-site by assigned personnel at each school. Participants completed the questionnaires using either online links or hard-copy materials.

After the informed consent process, participants answered some basic demographic questions and self-reported weight and height information. Subsequently, self-reported data on adherence to the CDG and SWB were collected. Questionnaires were counterbalanced in terms of their order to mitigate potential order biases. Following exclusion of individuals without demographic information the remaining 1433 participants aged 17 to 28 years old (average age: 19.19 ± 1.32, 57.0% female) were included for analysis.

Study variables and measures

Adherence to the Chinese Dietary Guidelines was assessed with the China Prime Diet Quality Score (CPDQS) [48]. The CPDQS is a food-based score designed to reflect the diet quality of individuals based on adherence to the 2016 Chinese Dietary Guidelines [48]. Dietary intakes of individuals, based on an average of 24-h recalls and brief questionnaire items, were scored according to 22 food groups. These groups encompass 15 recommended dietary components (dark green leafy vegetables, deep orange, other vegetables vegetables, deep orange fruits, citrus fruits, other fruits, whole grains/legumes, sweet potato, other potatoes, soybean, nuts, poultry, fish and shrimp, milk, and eggs) and 7 dietary components should be limited (red meat, fried food, refined grains, sugar sweetered beverages, salt, cooking oil, and alcohol). The CPDQS sums up scores from all 22 food groups, with a score range of 0 to 100 points. A higher score indicating better diet quality. Based on Chinese Dietary Guidelines and Chinese Food Pagoda, the present study classified food groups as (1) cereals and tubers; (2) vegetables and fruits; (3) dairy/soy/nuts; (4) animal source food; and (5) condiments/alcoholic beverages [45]. Further details about the scoring criteria for CPDQS are presented in the subsequent paragraph.

One serving is defined as the highest value of the daily recommended intake based on the recommended amounts of various food groups in the Chinese Food Pagoda, with an energy intake of 2000 kcal. In the scoring system for recommended dietary components, the highest score is attained when reaching 60% of the daily recommended intake. The baseline score ranges are as follows: 0 points for 0 servings, 1 point for 0–0.2 servings, 2 points for 0.2–0.4 servings, 3 points for 0.4–0.6 servings, and 4 points for ≥ 0.6 servings. Among these food groups, dark green leafy vegetables, whole grains/legumes, soybean, and fish/shrimp have scoring values that are twice the baseline score, while sweet potatoes and other potatoes have scoring values that are 0.5 times the baseline score. In the scoring system for dietary components should be limited, the highest score is attained when the intake stays below the daily recommended amount. The baseline score ranges are as follows: 4 points for ≤ 1 serving, 3 point for 1–2 servings, 2 points for 2–3 servings, 1 point for 3–4 servings, 0 points for ≥ 4 servings.

For accurate measurement of the CPDQS, this study referenced the common food types and portion sizes provided by the CDG and the Chinese Food Composition Tables [45, 49], along with the price list and actual portion sizes of meals in the refectories of surveyed universities, to annotate the common foods, food portions, and classification criteria for each food group.

SWB was measured by the Index of Well-being (IWB) [50]. The Index of Well-Being (IWB) is a widely used measure to assess SWB of Chinese individuals [51]. It consists of two subsections: the index of general affect and the overall life satisfaction item (α = 0.932). The index of general affect comprises eight items that inquire about the frequency of different emotions experienced, rated on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied). The overall life satisfaction item is a single question that asks “How satisfied are you with your life as a whole?” and is scored on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 7 = very satisfied). Index of Well-Being = 1.1 * (overall life satisfaction item) + 1.0 * (Index of General Affect).

Demographic covariates included age, gender, registered residence and university information. Health covariates included body mass index (BMI) measured through questions about height and weight. We followed the criteria of the World Health Organization for BMI categories [52]: underweight (BMI ≤ 18.49), normal weight (BMI = 18.50 to 24.90), overweight (BMI = 25.00 to 29.90) and obesity (BMI ≥ 30.00).

Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24 Statistics for Windows. First, frequency analysis and descriptive statistics (n and % for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation (M ± SD) values for continuous variables) were calculated. Next, to explore the relationships between variables, a correlation analysis over all variables was conducted. The following steps of the multiple regression analyses were conducted to examine the predictive role of CDG adherence and its components on SWB. Specifically, three multiple regression models were built for SWB variable considered as a criterion. Model 1 included only four covariate variables: gender, age, registered residence, and BMI; model 2 added CDG adherence as a simultaneous predictor; and model 3 replaced CDG adherence with its individual components, including cereals/tubers, vegetables/fruits, dairy/soy/nuts, animal source food and condiments/alcoholic beverages. For all analyses a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Study 2—Daily diary investigation

Participants and procedure

Study 2 conducted a daily diary study to confirm the findings of study 1 and enhance the robustness of the test of the proposed relationships because the cross-sectional survey data limited the possibility of causality inferences. In November 2022, using the method of snowball sampling via social-networking, 120 students were recruited from 2 universities located in southern China. The survey was administered online, and participants received the questionnaires through Internet links on a specific social media platform. Participants who wanted to take part in the study were invited to sign a written informed consent form and complete a questionnaire aimed at collecting demographic and baseline data. After completing an initial survey, participants took part in a 10-day daily diary study during which they were requested to complete one daily questionnaire on CDG adherence and daily SWB. The diaries were distributed to participants via Internet links every evening at 8 PM. Subsequently, participants were instructed to complete the daily diary by midnight each day.

Five participants who had insufficient data to calculate time-lagged variables for study analyses were excluded. The final sample for analysis comprised 115 students aged 17 to 24 years (mean age: 19.17 ± 1.13), consisting of 56.5% females. This sample consisted of participants who provided baseline data and a minimum of two daily diaries. In total, the 115 participants provided data for 1020 days out of a potential 1150 days (115 participants×10 days), resulting in a response rate of 88.70%.

Study variables and measures

The baseline questionnaire was aimed at measuring the demographic covariates and baseline SWB. Demographic covariates included age, gender, registered residence and university information. We measured baseline SWB with the Index of Well-being (IWB) identical to those for Study 1 [50]. Similar to Study 1, we utilized the CPQDS to assess participants’ adherence to the CDG. Furthermore, participants indicated their daily SWB using a single-item measure included in a comprehensive daily emotion assessment adapted from the Affect Valuation Index (AVI) [53]. Participants rated how much they had felt “Happy” over the course of the day on a 7-point scale (1 = not at all; 7 = very much). Previous research commonly employs single-item indicators to measure happiness, demonstrating that measuring SWB with a single item is reliable, valid, and viable [54, 55].

Statistical analysis

Analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS 24 and Mplus 8.4. First, descriptive statistics and correlation analyses over all variables were calculated by using SPSS 24. In addition, hierarchical multilevel regression was used to examine the hypothesized relationships between CDG adherence and its components and daily SWB. Hierarchical regression allows for within-person and between-person analyses to be conducted simultaneously while adjusting for the autocorrelation of the observations, thus reducing the possibility of inflated results [56]. Hierarchical regression equations were specified using Mplus 8.4, employing restricted maximum likelihood computations. Within-person variables were person-centered, and between-person variables were grand mean-centered.

Results

Study 1—the cross-sectional survey

Table 1 shows the general profile of the sample on different aspects of demographics, BMI, CDG adherence and its components, and SWB.

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics for Study Variables (Study 1)
Full size table

The full pattern of correlations is summarized in Fig. 1. As observed, the primary variables evaluated were significantly positively correlated. Specifically, SWB was positively correlated with CDG adherence (r = 0.24, p<0.001) and its components including cereals/tubers (r = 0.18, p<0.001), vegetables/fruits (r = 0.12, p<0.001), dairy/soy/nuts (r = 0.19, p<0.001), animal source foods (r = 0.15, p<0.001), and condiments/alcoholic beverages (r = 0.07, p<0.01).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Correlations Between Study Variables (Study 1)

Full size image

The regression results are presented in Table 2 and visualized in Fig. 2. The results indicated that higher CPDQS (CDG adherence) significantly predicted higher levels of SWB (β = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.19–0.30, p<0.001). Regarding relationships between SWB and individual components of CDG adherence, four components were unique predictors of happiness: cereals/tubers (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.14, p = 0.024), vegetables/fruits (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.05–0.19, p<0.001), dairy/soy/nuts (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04–0.18, p = 0.002), and condiments/alcoholic beverages (β = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.03–0.14, p = 0.002). Additionally, no significant association was observed between animal source food and SWB (β=-0.01, 95% CI: -0.08–0.06, p = 0.86).

Table 2 Regression Analysis for CPDQS and Its Components Predicting SWB (Study 1)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Multivariate regression coefficient plot of CDG adherence and its component effect on SWB (Study 1)

Full size image

Study 2—The daily diary investigation

Table 3 shows the general profile of the sample on different aspects of demographics, BMI, CDG adherence and its components, basic SWB and daily SWB.

Table 3 Descriptive Statistics for Study Variables (Study 1)
Full size table

Table 4 displays descriptive statistics and correlations among all variables of Study 2. Before testing our hypotheses, we examined the focal variables’ within- and between-person variation. For the CDG adherence, cereals/tubers, vegetables/fruits, dairy/soy/nuts, animal source food, condiments/alcoholic beverages, and daily SWB the proportions of within-person variance were 27.56%, 50.71%, 38.87%, 56.52%, 49.05%, 43.25%, and 41.75%, respectively, justifying the application of multilevel modeling. Intraclass correlation (ICC) for SWB is 0.58.

Table 4 Correlations Between Study Variables (Study 2)
Full size table

The hierarchical regression results are presented in Table 5 and visualized in Fig. 3. Model 2 revealed that CDG adherence was positively related to daily SWB (β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.11–0.26, p<0.001) after controlling for demographic covariates and basic SWB. According to model 3, within-subjects effects indicated that when participants reported higher levels of vegetables/fruits (β = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.04–0.17, p = 0.001), dairy/soy/nuts (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.02–0.11, p = 0.009), animal source food (β = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.12, p = 0.026), and condiments/alcoholic beverages (β = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.14, p = 0.026) relative to reported daily SWB. Additionally, no significant association was observed between cereals/tubers and daily SWB (β = 0.01, 95% CI: -0.04–0.06, p = 0.670).

Table 5 Hierarchical Regression Analysis for CPDQS and Its Components Predicting SWB (Study 2)
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Hierarchical regression coefficient plot of CDG adherence and its component effect on SWB (Study 2)

Full size image

Discussion

In light of the shifting focus toward a more positive and well-being-centered approach to eating behavior [57, 58], it becomes crucial to gather evidence on modifiable lifestyle behaviors and interventions that have a favorable impact on SWB. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to evaluate the association between adherence to the Chinese dietary guidelines and SWB among a large representative sample of Chinese adults. Based on the findings of a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation, the results indicate that participants with greatest adherence to the CDG reported higher levels of SWB compared to those with the lowest adherence. Our findings provide novel information and supportive data for an association between high dietary quality and positive psychological well-being.

Regarding the relation between CDG adherence and SWB, previous studies have linked healthy dietary patterns to the SWB [26, 40, 43]. Consistent with our findings, Moreno et al. reported that a high adherence to a healthy dietary pattern, resembling the Mediterranean dietary pattern, was associated with reduced odds of experiencing depressive episodes and improved SWB [43]. The CDG emphasizes the importance of consuming appropriate quantities and proportions of various food types, advocating a well-balanced dietary structure [45]. Similarly, results from a comprehensive systematic review revealed that adopting a healthy and balanced diet has the potential to enhance individuals’ overall well-being and improve quality of life [59]. Although the precise mechanisms remain uncertain, the protective links of CDG adherence with SWB may be attributed to its nutrient composition and psychological impact. On the one hand, the influence of specific nutrients found in the characteristic foods of the CDG on brain function provides a plausible explanation for the obtained results [40, 60]. Specifically, the inclusion of foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes, and whole grains in the CDG provides essential nutrients known to be associated with a high concentration of brain serotonin [61]. Serotonin, a neurotransmitter closely linked to happiness, positive mood, and motivation, plays a significant role in promoting feelings of vitality and psychological well-being [61, 62]. On the other hand, the relationship between CDG adherence and SWB may be purely perceptual, resulting from consumers’ attribute beliefs and expectations associated with health food. According to the food well-being paradigm, feelings of satisfaction and goal achievement derived from making healthy food choices may contribute to experiencing emotional well-being [28, 63]. Therefore, participants who exhibit high levels of adherence to CDG may infer that their nutrition are healthy, and as a result, the feeling of satisfaction derived from making dietary choices may contribute to the experience of SWB. In line with this, a positive perception of health has been consistently associated with both life satisfaction and happiness, as evidenced by a wide range of empirical studies [64,65,66].

Moreover, our findings also revealed the consumption of certain components of the CDG is positively associated with SWB. In particular, a cross-sectional survey and daily diary investigation consistently show that higher intake of vegetables/fruits and dairy/soy/nuts is positively associated with increased levels of SWB. Conversely, decreasing the consumption of condiments/alcoholic beverages has been linked to improved SWB. These results are consistent with previous studies showing that consuming a significant quantity of vegetables and fruits is associated with increased levels of self-efficacy and happiness [27, 29, 67], while concurrently lowering levels of psychological distress [68, 69]. In addition, a cross-sectional survey also identified a positive association between higher consumption of dietary protein sources, including dairy products, soy, and nuts, with improved quality of sleep and greater happiness [70]. Regarding the SWB effects of condiments and alcoholic beverages, previous studies have revealed that diets low in salt, sugar, and fat lead are associated with higher levels of SWB [71, 72]. Additionally, excessive alcohol consumption has shown a negative correlation with eudaimonic well-being and is a predictor of psychological distress [58, 73, 74]. To the best of our knowledge, the current evidence concerning these findings is both limited and indirect. Consequently, further research is imperative to provide clarity.

Surprisingly, the cross-sectional survey observed a significant positive association between the consumption of cereals/tubers and SWB, while no such association was identified in daily diary investigation. Consuming cereals and tubers, which are rich in dietary fiber and serve as excellent sources of vitamin B and carbohydrates, is integral to maintaining a healthy lifestyle [45]. The CDG recommends daily intake of whole grains and tubers, while cautioning against excessive consumption of refined grains such as rice and flour [45]. Supporting the results of the cross-sectional survey, cereal crops can serve as a protective factor beneficial for the mental health of adults across previous studies [75, 76]. Further, the distinct nutrients present in cereals and tubers are also linked to a substantial concentration of brain serotonin [40]. However, the ten-day diary survey did not uncover the daily fluctuations in cereal and tuber consumption were associated with SWB. A tentative explanation for the inconsistency in the relationship between the cross-sectional survey and the daily diary investigation has been lies in cultural specificity in diet [77, 78]. The Chinese population has traditionally followed a dietary pattern centered around grains, with refined grains such as rice and wheat serving as the primary staples for all three meals [79]. Cultural differences in dietary habits among Chinese individuals may contribute to a weaker perception of the association between refined grains and health. As a result, the impact of daily fluctuations in cereal/tuber consumption on SWB may be diminished [77, 80].

On the other hand, the daily diary investigation has observed a significant positive association between the consumption of animal source food and SWB, whereas no such association has been identified in the cross-sectional survey. The CDG advocated for increasing the consumption of aquatic products, such as fish and shrimp, and reducing the excessive intake of red and processed meat products [45]. Previous research on the association between animal food sources and SWB have been inconsistent [43, 81, 82]. Some studies have found a relationship between reduced intake of red and processed meat or increased fish consumption and well-being [40, 82, 83], while other studies have not found such a correlation [1, 43]. Although the relationship appears to be more complex than anticipated, a tentative explanation is the conflict between the rational and emotional selves [84, 85]. Within the realm of diet, the emotional self exhibits a positive response to red and processed meat, leading to instant gratification. The rational self, in contrast, acknowledges the significance of healthy behaviors like a nutritious diet and regular exercise, resulting in delayed gratification [1]. Therefore, restricting red and processed meat consumption may reduce immediate gratification in cross-sectional studies, but it may give us deliberative well-being in a ten-day diary investigation.

The results of this study must be interpreted taking into account some limitations. Firstly, the limited sample size of our study, which include only college students from southern China, restricts the generalizability of our research findings. Hence, it is imperative for future research to replicate the findings using a more heterogeneous and broader sample. Secondly, although two studies were conducted using different samples and methods, the characteristics of a survey restrict the possibility of causal inferences. To extend this research and verify the directionality of these findings, incorporating an experimental design or randomized controlled trial could help determine whether CDG adherence is associated with increased happiness over time. Additionally, the study utilizes subjective reports to evaluate SWB, and the outdated nature of the instruments results in certain limitations. Future research would benefit from employing multiple measurements of SWB using a variety of indicators and integrating physiological health measures. This approach would address the significant dearth of research on the impact of healthy eating on SWB and yield evidence-based findings to determine whether the influence of healthy eating is a placebo effect or an additional mediator with physical health benefits. Finally, the study omits an exploration of factors beyond a healthy diet that could impact SWB. Existing research suggests that social and lifestyle factors, including the quality of social relationships, income, smoking, sleep, and physical activity, also play a role in predicting SWB [86, 87]. Future studies on the connection between a healthy diet and SWB should include controls for these variables to confirm the association.

Conclusions

This research analyzed the influence of food consumption on SWB with two studies: a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation. Greater adherence to the CDG was associated with better SWB in a representative sample of Chinese adults. Additionally, the consumption of certain food groups of CDG such as vegetables/fruits, dairy/soy/nuts, and condiments/alcoholic beverages is also correlate with SWB. In conclusion, the assessment and recommendation to adhere to the CDG could serve as an ecological approach for enhancing the affective experience and life evaluation of the population. This approach not only promotes SWB but also offers additional benefits that extend beyond the realm of well-being.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Gschwandtner A, Jewell S, Kambhampati US. Lifestyle and life satisfaction: the role of delayed gratification. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(3):1043–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00440-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Bi X, Ding Z. Health lifestyles and Chinese oldest-old’s subjective well-being-evidence from a latent class analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02121-0.

  3. Burdette AM, Needham BL, Taylor MG, Hill TD. Health lifestyles in Adolescence and Self-rated health into Adulthood. J Health Soc Behav. 2017;58(4):520–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146517735313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guenther PM, Casavale KO, Reedy J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hiza HAB, Kuczynski KJ, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2010. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2013;113(4):569–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.12.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Evers I, Heerings M, de Roos NM, Jongen PJ, Visser LH. Adherence to dietary guidelines is associated with better physical and mental quality of life: results from a cross-sectional survey among 728 Dutch MS patients. Nutr Neurosci. 2022;25(8):1633–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415x.2021.1885240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taherifard E, Moradian MJ, Taherifard E, Hemmati A, Rastegarfar B, Vardanjani HM. The prevalence of risk factors associated with non-communicable diseases in Afghan refugees in southern Iran: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10482-9.

  7. Zhang Y, Wei Y, Tang D, Lu J, Zhang N, Hu Y, et al. Association of major dietary patterns and different obesity phenotypes in Southwest China: the China multi-ethnic cohort (CMEC) study. Eur J Nutr. 2023;62(1):465–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02997-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nestel PJ. Dietary Fat and Blood pressure. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;21(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-019-0918-y.

  9. Kitaoka K, Miura K, Takashima N, Kadota A, Harada A, Nakamura Y, et al. Association between Dietary Patterns and Serum Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Japanese women and men: the Japan Multi-institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.63675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Y, Li M, Wang Y, Geng R, Fang J, Liu Q, et al. Understanding the mechanism underlying the anti-diabetic effect of dietary component: a focus on gut microbiota. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2045895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Willemsen RF, McNeil J, Heer E, Johnson ST, Friedenreich CM, Brenner DR. Dietary patterns with combined and site-specific cancer incidence in Alberta’s tomorrow project cohort. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76(3):360–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00958-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hepsomali P, Coxon C. Inflammation and diet: focus on mental and cognitive health. Adv Clin Experimental Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/152350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Firth J, Solmi M, Wootton RE, Vancampfort D, Schuch FB, Hoare E, et al. A meta-review of lifestyle psychiatry: the role of exercise, smoking, diet and sleep in the prevention and treatment of mental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2020;19(3):360–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20773.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Watson C. Eating for better mental health. Nature. 2020;588(7837):63–S. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-03447-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Almeida Gratao LH, Pessoa MC, Rodrigues da Silva TP, Rocha LL, Cassimiro Inacio ML, Prado Rangel de Oliveira TR, et al. Dietary patterns, breakfast consumption, meals with family and associations with common mental disorders in adolescents: a school-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13367-7.

  16. Huang Q, Liu H, Suzuki K, Ma S, Liu C. Linking what we eat to our Mood: a review of Diet, Dietary antioxidants, and Depression. Antioxidants. 2019;8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8090376.

  17. Sadeghi O, Keshteli AH, Afshar H, Esmaillzadeh A, Adibi P. Adherence to Mediterranean dietary pattern is inversely associated with depression, anxiety and psychological distress. Nutr Neurosci. 2021;24(4):248–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415x.2019.1620425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ye S, Ho KKW, Wakabayashi K, Kato Y. Relationship between university students’ emotional expression on tweets and subjective well-being: considering the effects of their self-presentation and online communication skills. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):594. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15485-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan H, Li D, Zhou W, Jiao L, Liu S, Zhang L. Parents’ personality traits and children’s subjective well-being: a chain mediating model. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(19):16049–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01078-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: Subjective Well-Being contributes to Health and Longevity. Appl Psychology: Health Well-Being. 2011;3(1):1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Anglim J, Horwood S, Smillie LD, Marrero RJ, Wood JK. Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-being from personality: a Meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2020;146(4):279–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruggeri K, Garcia-Garzon E, Maguire A, Matz S, Huppert FA. Well-being is more than happiness and life satisfaction: a multidimensional analysis of 21 countries. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01423-y.

  23. Lera-López F, Ollo-López A, Sánchez-Santos JM. How does physical activity make you feel better? The Mediational Role of Perceived Health. Appl Res Qual Life. 2017;12(3):511–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9473-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Diener E, Napa Scollon C, Lucas RE. The Evolving Concept of Subjective Well-Being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. In: Diener E, editor. Assessing Well-Being: the Collected Works of Ed Diener. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2009. pp. 67–100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Menne-Lothmann C, Jacobs N, Derom C, Thiery E, van Os J, Wichers M. Genetic and Environmental Causes of Individual Differences in Daily Life Positive Affect and reward experience and its overlap with stress-sensitivity. Behav Genet. 2012;42(5):778–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9553-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meegan AP, Perry IJ, Phillips CM. The Association between Dietary Quality and Dietary Guideline Adherence with Mental Health outcomes in adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Nutrients. 2017;9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9030238.

  27. Holder MD. The contribution of Food Consumption to Well-Being. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2019;74:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000499147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Apaolaza V, Hartmann P, D’Souza C, Lopez CM. Eat organic - feel good? The relationship between organic food consumption, health concern and subjective wellbeing. Food Qual Prefer. 2018;63:51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.07.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Badri MA, Alkhaili M, Aldhaheri H, Alnahyan H, Yang G, Albahar M, et al. Understanding the Interactions of Happiness, Self-Rated Health, Mental feelings, habit of eating Healthy and Sport/Activities: a path model for Abu Dhabi. Nutrients. 2022;14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010055.

  30. De Leon A, Jahns L, Roemmich JN, Duke SE, Casperson SL. Consumption of Dietary guidelines for americans types and amounts of vegetables increases Mean subjective happiness scale scores: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Acad Nutr Dietetics. 2022;122(7):1355–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan T-C, Yen T-J, Fu Y-C, Hwang J-S, ClickDiary. Online Tracking of Health Behaviors and Mood. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(6). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4315.

  32. Chang H-H, Nayga RM. Childhood obesity and unhappiness: the influence of Soft drinks and fast food consumption. J Happiness Stud. 2010;11(3):261–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9139-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ishikawa M, Yokoyama T, Hayashi F, Takemi Y, Nakaya T, Fukuda Y, et al. Subjective well-being is Associated with Food Behavior and demographic factors in chronically ill older Japanese people living alone. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(3):341–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-017-0930-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zang J, Guo C, Wang Z, Cheng Y, Jin W, Zhu Z, et al. Is adherence to the Chinese Dietary guidelines associated with better self-reported health? The Chinese dietary guidelines adherence score. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2018;27(4):914–24. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.072018.02.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu FB. Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim N-H, Song S, Jung S-Y, Lee E, Kim Z, Moon H-G, et al. Dietary pattern and health-related quality of life among breast cancer survivors. Bmc Womens Health. 2018;18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-018-0555-7.

  37. Tucker KL. Dietary patterns, approaches, and multicultural perspective. Appl Physiol Nutr Metabolism. 2010;35(2):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1139/h10-010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Vajdi M, Farhangi MA. A systematic review of the association between dietary patterns and health-related quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01581-z.

  39. Godoy-Izquierdo D, Ogallar A, Lara R, Rodriguez-Tadeo A, Arbinaga F. Association of a Mediterranean Diet and Fruit and Vegetable Consumption with Subjective Well-being among adults with overweight and obesity. Nutrients. 2021;13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13041342.

  40. Ferrer-Cascales R, Albaladejo-Blazquez N, Ruiz-Robledillo N, Clement-Carbonell V, Sanchez-SanSegundo M, Zaragoza-Marti A. Higher adherence to the Mediterranean Diet is related to more subjective happiness in adolescents: the role of Health-Related Quality of Life. Nutrients. 2019;11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030698.

  41. deKoning L, Anand SS. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population., Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2599– 608. Vascular medicine (London, England). 2004;9(2):145-6; https://doi.org/10.1191/1358863x04vm552xx.

  42. Rubini A, Vilaplana-Prieto C, Flor-Alemany M, Yeguas-Rosa L, Hernandez-Gonzalez M, Felix-Garcia FJ, et al. Assessment of the cost of the Mediterranean Diet in a low-income region: adherence and relationship with available incomes. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12433-w.

  43. Moreno-Agostino D, Felix Caballero F, Martin-Maria N, Tyrovolas S, Lopez-Garcia P, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, et al. Mediterranean diet and wellbeing: evidence from a nationwide survey. Psychol Health. 2019;34(3):321–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2018.1525492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ibarrola-Rivas M-J, Nonhebel S. Regional food preferences influence environmental impacts of diets. Food Secur. 2022;14(4):1063–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01270-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang S-s, Lay S, Yu H-n. Shen S-r. Dietary guidelines for Chinese residents (2016): comments and comparisons. J Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B. 2016;17(9):649–56. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1600341.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lin J-C, Yin K-L, Huang Y, Liu Y. The HealthyDietary behavioral intention for Chinese residents andIts Effect on depressive symptoms. Chin J Appl Psychol. 2023;29(2):128–36. https://doi.org/10.20058/j.cnki.cjap.021148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ding Y, Xu F, Zhong C, Tong L, Li F, Li Q, et al. Association between Chinese Dietary guidelines Compliance Index for pregnant women and risks of pregnancy complications in the Tongji Maternal and Child Health Cohort. Nutrients. 2021;13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030829.

  48. He Y, Wang H, Fang Y, Xia J, Lian Y, Su C. China prime diet quality score. Wei Sheng Yan jiu = Journal of Hygiene Research. 2021;50(2):198–204. https://doi.org/10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2021.02.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang Y-X. China Food Composition Tables, Standard Edition. Vol. 2. Di 6 ban edn. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Campbell A. Subjective measures of well-being. Am Psychol. 1976;31(2):117–24. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.31.2.117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu H-h, Peng F, Zeng X-h, Zhao J-b, Zhang X-y. Authoritarian personality and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: the moderation effect of the organizational culture context. Pers Indiv Differ. 2019;138:79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Obesity. Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i–xii.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tsai JL, Knutson B, Fung HH. Cultural variation in affect valuation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006;90(2):288–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Dakin BC, Tan NP, Conner TS, Bastian B. The relationship between prosociality, meaning, and happiness in Everyday Life. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(6):2787–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-022-00526-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Oishi S. The Cornerstone of Research on Subjective Well-Being. Valid Assessment Methodology. In.; 2019.

  56. Hox JJ, Moerbeek M, Schoot R. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. Third edition edn. New York, NY: Routledge New York, NY; 2018.

  57. Steptoe A. Happiness and Health. In: Fielding JE, editor. Annual Review of Public Health, Vol 40. 2019. p. 339– 59.

  58. Anderson AR, Fowers BJ. Lifestyle behaviors, psychological distress, and well-being: a daily diary study. Soc Sci Med. 2020;263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113263.

  59. Brennstuhl M-J, Martignon S, Tarquinio C. Alimentation et santé mentale: l’alimentation comme voie vers le bonheur? Nutr Clinique et Métabolisme. 2021;35(3):168–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nupar.2021.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Gomez-Pinilla F. Brain foods: the effects of nutrients on brain function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9(7):568–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2421.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Rooney C, McKinley MC, Woodside JV. The potential role of fruit and vegetables in aspects of psychological well-being: a review of the literature and future directions. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013;72(4):420–32. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665113003388.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jenkins TA, Nguyen JCD, Polglaze KE, Bertrand PP. Influence of Tryptophan and Serotonin on Mood and Cognition with a possible role of the gut-brain Axis. Nutrients. 2016;8(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8010056.

  63. Bublitz MG, Peracchio LA, Andreasen AR, Kees J, Kidwell B, Miller EG, et al. Promoting positive change: advancing the food well-being paradigm. J Bus Res. 2013;66(8):1211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Nie P, Wang L, Dragone D, Lu H, Sousa-Poza A, Ziebarth NR. The better you feel, the harder you fall: Health perception biases and mental health among Chinese adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. China Econ Rev. 2022;71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101708.

  65. Bhuiyan MF, Szulga RS. Extreme bounds of subjective well-being: economic development and micro determinants of life satisfaction. Appl Econ. 2017;49(14):1351–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1218426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Waldinger RJ, Schulz MS. What’s love got to do with it? Social functioning, perceived health, and daily happiness in married octogenarians. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(2):422–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Welch JD, Ellis EM. Sex differences in the Association of Perceived Ambiguity, Cancer Fatalism, and Health-Related Self-Efficacy with Fruit and Vegetable Consumption. J Health Communication. 2018;23(12):984–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1534905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nguyen B, Ding D, Mihrshahi S. Fruit and vegetable consumption and psychological distress: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses based on a large Australian sample. Bmj Open. 2017;7(3). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014201.

  69. Shawon MSR, Jahan E, Rouf RR, Hossain FB. Psychological distress and unhealthy dietary behaviours among adolescents aged 12–15 years in nine South-East Asian countries: a secondary analysis of the Global School-Based Health Survey data. Br J Nutr. 2023;129(7):1242–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114522002306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Bardosono S, Santosa E, Lada CO, Chandra DN, Wibowo Y, Basrowi RW, et al. The contribution of nutrition and quality of sleep and happiness in under-five-year-old children. J Family Med Prim care. 2022;11(7):3528–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2308_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Nestorowicz R, Jerzyk E, Rogala A. In the labyrinth of dietary patterns and well-being-when eating healthy is not enough to be well. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031259.

  72. Takao T, Sumi N, Yamanaka Y, Fujimoto S, Kamada T. Associations between lifestyle behaviour changes and the optimal well-being of middle-aged Japanese individuals. Biopsychosoc Med. 2021;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-021-00210-5.

  73. Boden JM, Fergusson DM. Alcohol and depression. Addiction. 2011;106(5):906–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03351.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD. The heart’s content: the association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):655–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Li X, Tian D, Qin P, Guo W, Lu J, Zhu W, et al. Dietary, physical exercises and mental stress in a Chinese population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11189-7.

  76. Jin Q, Liang Y, Miao J, Xiong Y, Liu Z, Xue H, et al. Association between food intake and mental health problems among preschoolers in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1003416.

  77. Rodriguez-Arauz G, Ramirez-Esparza N, Smith-Castro V. Food attitudes and well-being: the role of culture. Appetite. 2016;105:180–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.05.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Freedman I. Cultural specificity in food choice - the case of ethnography in Japan. Appetite. 2016;96:138–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Zhen S, Ma Y, Zhao Z, Yang X, Wen D. Dietary pattern is associated with obesity in Chinese children and adolescents: data from China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). Nutr J. 2018;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0372-8.

  80. Khanna SK. Cultural influences on Food: Dietary and Health implications. Ecol Food Nutr. 2021;60(6):633–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.2021.1999153.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Conner TS, Brookie KL, Richardson AC, Polak MA. On carrots and curiosity: eating fruit and vegetables is associated with greater flourishing in daily life. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;20(2):413–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Kouvari M, Tyrovolas S, Panagiotakos DB. Red meat consumption and healthy ageing: a review. Maturitas. 2016;84:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Akbaraly TN, Brunner EJ, Ferrie JE, Marmot MG, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Dietary pattern and depressive symptoms in middle age. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;195(5):408–13. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.108.058925.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Thaler R, Shefrin H. An economic theory of self-control. J Polit Econ. 1981;89:392–406. https://doi.org/10.1086/260971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Loewenstein G, O’Donoghue T, Bhatia S. Modeling the interplay between affect and deliberation. Decision. 2015;2:55–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Zubala A, MacGillivray S, Frost H, Kroll T, Skelton DA, Gavine A, et al. Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Quarta S, Siculella L, Levante A, Carluccio MA, Calabriso N, Scoditti E, et al. Association between Mediterranean lifestyle and perception of well-being and distress in a sample population of university Italian students. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2023;74(4):556–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2023.2232129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank all of the participants involved in this study.

Funding

This research was funded by Yunnan Institute for the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine Industry (YTRDRI202204) and the Research Foundation of Yunnan Normal University (YJSJJ22-A04, YJSJJ22-B46).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jiaci Lin, Fuhua Yang authors have contributed equally to this paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University, Lianda Street, 650500, Kunming, Yunnan, China

    Jiaci Lin, Fuhua Yang, Miaosen Lan, Yichen Ding & Keli Yin

  2. School of Information, Yunnan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 650500, Kunming, China

    Fuhua Yang

Authors
  1. Jiaci Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fuhua Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miaosen Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yichen Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keli Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualisation/design: L.J., Y.F. and Y.K. Data analysis/interpretation: L.J., L.M. and D.Y. Supervision: YK. Drafting article: L.J. Critical revision of the article: Y.F. and Y.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keli Yin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of ethics committee at Applied Psychology Program, Faculty of Education, Yunnan Normal University (2022010). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, J., Yang, F., Lan, M. et al. Adhere to the Chinese dietary guidelines associated with better subjective well-being: evidence from a cross-sectional survey and a daily diary investigation. BMC Public Health 24, 445 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17880-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17880-9

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us