Skip to main content
Download PDF

Visceral adiposity index is positively associated with fasting plasma glucose: a cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2020

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 313 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Visceral adiposity index (VAI) has been recognized as a reliable indicator for visceral adiposity. However, it remains largely unexplored on its association with fasting plasma glucose (FPG). The current study aims to explore the association between VAI and FPG using a representative dataset.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out based on the dataset from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017–2020. Univariate and Multiple linear regression analysis were performed to explore the relationship between VAI and FPG. Generalized additive model (GAM) and smooth curve fitting analysis were performed to explore the nonlinear relationship between VAI and FPG. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of VAI for FPG elevation.

Results

A total of 4437 participants with complete data were finally included in the research. Individuals were divided into 4 quartiles according to the calculated VAI value: Q1 (VAI<0.69), Q2 (0.69 ≤ VAI < 1.18), Q3 (1.18 ≤ VAI < 2.02) and Q4 (VAI ≥ 2.02). FPG significantly increased with the increasing VAI quartile. Multiple linear regression analysis showed VAI was independently positively associated with FPG after adjusting confounding factors. As a continuous variable, an increase of one unit in VAI was correlated with 0.52 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.41–0.63, p < 0.0001) higher FPG level. As a categorical variable, 4th VAI quartile group was related to 0.71 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.47–0.95, p < 0.001) higher FPG level compared with 1st VAI group. GAM and smooth curve fitting analysis identified the non-linear relationship between VAI and FPG, and 4.02 was identified as the inflection point using two-piecewise linear regression. The positive association between VAI and FPG existed when VAI was lower (β = 0.73, p < 0.0001) and higher than 4.02 (β = 0.23, p = 0.0063). ROC analysis indicated VAI has a good predictive value for FPG elevation (AUC = 0.7169, 95% CI: 0.6948–0.7389), and the best threshold of VAI was 1.4315.

Conclusion

VAI was an independently risk indicator for FPG, and VAI was nonlinearly positively associated with FPG. VAI had a good predictive value for elevated FPG. VAI might become a useful indicator for risk assessment and treatment of hyperglycemia in clinical practice.

Peer Review reports

Background

Data have shown steady increase in diabetes in many countries. The prevalence rate of diabetes in China sharply increased from less than 1% in the 1980s to nearly 11% in 2013 [1]. The estimated overall prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes reached to 12.4 and 38.1% in 2018 according to the nationally cross-sectional survey conducted in mainland China [2]. It is estimated that over 783 million population are expected to develop diabetes by 2045, which is related to as high as 1054 billion USD health expenditures [3]. Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) has been identified as an acknowledged risk factor for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [4]. Moreover, higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was closely associated with increased mortality [5], and research finding showed that elevated FPG levels within the normal range were also related to higher risk for T2DM [6].

Among the multi-factors in the pathophysiology of T2DM, obesity has been recognized as an essential contributor. Obesity has become a global health and economic concern due to its increasing prevalence and heavy disease burden [7]. The role of obesity in T2DM is attracting considerable research interest worldwide [8]. Research showed obese subjects with body mass index (BMI)>30 had 7.19 times higher risk for developing T2DM compared with those with normal weight (BMI < 25) [9]. In addition, obesity significantly increased the risk of abnormal FPG (OR = 1.44), and the OR reached 1.84 in individuals with moderate/severe obesity [10]. It is worth noting that excessive visceral fat deposition and ectopic fat were recognized as emerging risk factors for diabetes compared with peripheral deposition of fat [11]. Growing evidence has proved that visceral obesity is associated with worsening of insulin sensitivity [12] and increased risk of getting diabetes [13]. Larger amount of visceral adipose tissue quantified by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was correlated with higher risk for developing T2DM [14].

Magnetic resonance-based assessment could accurately assess lean and adipose tissue according to the distinct magnetic properties of fat and water. However, it is not suitable for widespread clinical use because it is expensive and time consuming [15]. Therefore, it is urgent to establish a convenient and cost-effective method for the assessment of visceral obesity. The most commonly used parameter, BMI, can no longer help clinicians evaluate and manage obesity-related health risk solely because this general adiposity indicator is difficult to distinguish between subcutaneous and visceral obesity [16]. In a prospective study included 10,419 Chinese adults, waist circumference (WC) was found strongly correlated with the higher risk for T2DM in comparison with BMI [17]. Act as a simply applicable anthropometric index for abdominal adiposity assessment, WC is recommended in clinical practice to optimize obesity risk stratification [18]. Marco C et al. [19] extrapolated a novel gender-specific indicator termed visceral adiposity index (VAI) for visceral adiposity evaluation based on simple biochemical metabolic and anthropometric indicators, including WC, BMI, triglyceride (TG), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL). VAI is considered as a surrogate indicator of visceral adipose distribution and visceral fat dysfunction, and identified as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events, cerebrovascular events with higher sensitivity and specificity compared with classic parameters [19,20,21].

Numerous researches have confirmed the relationship between VAI, diabetes, and diabetic complications. Recently, Zhang reported VAI was an independent risk factor for developing newly diagnosed T2DM and VAI had a strong predictive value for T2DM during 4-year follow-up of 4078 Chinese adults [22]. Another study including 1091 non-diabetic participants showed that VAI was associated with 11% higher risk for developing T2DM after 5-year follow-up [23]. A cohort study enrolling 8948 T2DM patients indicated VAI was dramatically associated with an increased risk for diabetic nephropathy (HR = 1.127; 95% CI: 1.050–1.210) [24]. However, it remains unknown the association between VAI and FPG. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the relationship between VAI and FPG based on the NHANES database with large sample size, which might contribute to early diagnosis, risk assessment and therapeutic intervention of elevated FPG.

Methods

Data source and study population

NHANES is a national representative cross-sectional survey on non-institutionalized population in the US with publicly accessible data, conducted by the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which included demographic, dietary, examination, laboratory, questionnaire and limited data. Datasets from NHANES 2017 to 2020 required for the analysis were obtained from the NHANES website (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/). The written informed consents were obtained from all participants, and the program was approved by the Ethics Review Board of National Center for Health Statistics.

Of 15,560 candidates extracted from the NHANES database, 9884 participants aged≥18 without indispensable information for VAI calculation were excluded (missing data of BMI, N = 2423; missing data of waist circumference, N = 603; missing data of HDL-c, N = 2210 and missing data of TG, N = 4648). Individuals without information on fasting plasma glucose (N = 1239) were also excluded. Eventually, a total of 4437 participants were enrolled in this study, and the final selected subjects were divided into 4 groups according to the VAI value. The flow diagram of selection process was provided in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram displaying the enrollment of study population

Full size image

Anthropometric indexes measurement

High-quality anthropometric measurement data was collected by well-trained NHANES staff following standardized examination protocols, using standardized examination procedures and calibrated equipment. A stadiometer with an adjustable head piece and a fixed vertical backboard was used to measure standing height. Participants were weighed in kilograms using a digital weight scale. The formula weight (kilograms)/square of height (meters) was used to determine BMI values. WC was measured to the closest 1 mm at the end of the normal expiration. Draw a horizontal line just above the right ilium’s uppermost lateral border, and wrap the measuring tape around the waist. Blood pressure (BP) in sitting position was measured in the right arm sing Omron HEM-907XL BP monitor. After a rest of 5 min and triplicate BP determinations with at least 1 min interval were taken. The means of the three BP measurements were used in the following analysis.

Study variables

The demographics questionnaires were asked by accomplished interviewers using Computer-Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) system. Participants venous blood samples were collected and examined following the NHANES laboratory protocol. All methods of standard biochemistry were measured on the Roche Cobas 6000 (c501 module) analyzer. More detailed information about analyte methodologies, principles, and operating procedures could be found in the Laboratory Method Files at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/. The information on treatment of diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia was provided at the questionnaire data.

The collected anthropometric data (BMI and WC) and biochemical data (TG and HDL) were used for VAI calculation by previous reported formula [19], and the units of WC and BMI were cm and Kg/m2, respectively. Both TG and HDL were expressed in mmol/L.

$${\displaystyle \begin{array}{c} Male: VAI=\frac{WC}{39.68+1.88\times BMI}\times \frac{TG}{1.03}\times \frac{1.31}{HDL}\\ {} Female: VAI=\frac{WC}{36.58+1.89\times BMI}\times \frac{TG}{0.81}\times \frac{1.52}{HDL}\end{array}}$$

FPG was measured using the Roche/Hitachi Cobas C311 UV assay. Diabetes was defined as a self-reported history of diabetes, HbA1c level ≥ 6.5% or FPG level ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, according to the 2019 American Diabetes Association criteria [25].

Smoking was defined as smoking over 100 cigarettes during entire lifetime [26]. Moderate and vigorous activity were defined as ‘activity that causes small, and large increase in breathing or heart rate, respectively [27]. For example. Brisk walking was classified as moderate activity, while carrying heavy loads was categorized as vigorous activity. Stoke was self-reported and physician diagnosis using epidemiological data from NHANES [28]. eGFR was calculated through the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Then, CKD were defined according to the KDIGO guidelines [29]: stage 1, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥ 3 mg/mmol with eGFR ≥90 ml/min/1.73 m2; stage 2, ACR ≥ 3 mg/mmol with 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR ≤89 ml/min/1.73 m2; stage 3, 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR ≤59 ml/min/1.73 m2 (with or without ACR ≥ 3 mg/mmol); stage 4, 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 ≤ eGFR ≤29 ml/min/1.73 m2; and stage 5, eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Covariates in multivariate models might contribute to muddled correlations between VAI and FPG. The following variables were selected as covariates in the current study: age, gender, SBP, DBP, HR, smoking, physical activity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, CKD, race, TC, LDL-c, ALT and ALP based on univariate analysis and previous studies.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using R software and EmpowerStats. Sample weights were adjusted to present nationally representative estimates in all analyses according to the stratified, multistage probability sampling design [30]. Continuous and categorical variables were presented as mean ± standard error and frequencies (percentages), respectively. Participants were equally divided into 4 quartiles according to the calculated VAI value: Q1 (VAI < 0.69), Q2 (0.69 ≤ VAI < 1.18), Q3 (1.18 ≤ VAI < 2.02) and Q4 (VAI ≥ 2.02). One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparison the differences of characteristics between 4 VAI groups for continuous variables and chi-square tests were utilized for categorical variables. The independent relationship between exposure factors and FPG was calculated using univariate analysis and multiple linear regression model. The association between VAI and FPG was expressed using 3 models with different adjustment for confounding factors: a crude model; minimally adjusted model: adjusted for age and gender; fully adjusted model: adjusted for age, gender, SBP, DBP, HR, smoking, physical activity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, CKD, race, TC, LDL-c, ALT and ALP. These confounders were selected on the basis of their associations with FPG or an alteration in effect estimate of over 10% [31]. Non-linear relationships between VAI and fasting plasma glucose were explored using generalized additive model (GAM) and smooth curve fitting. Furthermore, we calculated the inflection points using two-piecewise linear regression model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to evaluate the predictive potential of VAI for FPG elevation. The best threshold was determined according to the sum of sensitivity and specificity. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sample weighting was applied for the unequal probability of individual sampling, resulting from complex multistage survey design.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the participants

Table 1 described the baseline characteristics of the study population. Four thousand four hundred thirty-seven individuals were divided into 4 groups according to the VAI value. 2175 (49.02%) were males, and the average age of included subjects was 44.41 ± 18.94. Subjects in the 4th VAI quartile group had significantly higher levels of age, anthropometric indexes (including BMI, SBP, DBP, HR, WC and hip circumference), WBC, neutrophil, hemoglobin, platelet, FPG, HbA1c, TG, TC, HLD-c, LDL-c, globulin, ALT, γGT, and uric acid. It is worth noting that FPG increased rapidly from 5.55 to 6.70 mmol/L with the increasing VAI quartiles (p < 0.0001). The percentage of smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, stroke, and CKD history, and the proportion of taking glucose-lowering, antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs also rose with the increasing of VAI quartiles. However, subjects with higher VAI value presented lower levels of albumin and total bilirubin, percentage of male and vigorous physical activity were less frequent. Additionally, different race distribution was found, as the VAI quartile increased, the proportion of Mexican American, Other Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White increased, while Non-Hispanic Black decreased. No statistical significances were observed in other variables among the VAI quartile groups.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of population with different VAI levels
Full size table

Univariate analysis for FPG

Univariate linear analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the variables and FPG. As shown in Table 2, age, male, SBP, DBP, HR, WC, hip circumference, smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, stroke, CKD, TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, ALT and ALP were all positively associated with FPG level (p < 0.05). Vigorous physical activity and HDL-c were negatively related to FPG level (p < 0.05). Compared with Mexican American, we observed a significant negative correlation between Non-Hispanic White and FPG, whereas no significant association was found between moderate physical activity, AST, total bilirubin, other races and FPG. Of note, VAI was significantly positively correlated with FPG (β = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.21–0.27, p < 0.0001).

Table 2 Univariate analysis for fasting plasma glucose
Full size table

Association between VAI and FPG in different models

Multiple linear regression model was used to evaluate the independent relationship between VAI and FPG. Table 3 displayed the β (95% CI) of VAI for FPG in different models. Higher VAI levels were remarkably associated with increased FPG levels. As a continuous variable, an increase of one unit in VAI was associated with 0.24 (95% CI: 0.21–0.27, p < 0.0001), 0.21 (95% CI: 0.19–0.24, p < 0.0001), and 0.52 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.41–0.63, p < 0.0001) higher FPG level, respectively, in crude model, minimally adjusted and fully adjusted model. As a categorical variable, 4th VAI quartile group was associated with 0.71 mmol/L (95% CI: 0.47–0.95, p < 0.001) higher FPG level after controlling all the potential confounding factors in fully adjusted model compared with participants with lowest FPG level in Q1.The trend test remained significant (p < 0.001).

Table 3 Relationship between VAI and fasting plasma glucose in different models
Full size table

Association between VAI and FPG in subgroups

After the correction of multiple potential confounding factors, the association between VAI and FPG levels remained significant in all subgroups stratified by age, gender, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. No significant association between VAI and FPG levels was found in diabetes subgroup in the fully adjusted model (β = 0.59, 95% CI: − 0.41-1.19, p = 0.0535). To further assess the impact of glucose-lowering drugs on FPG, the association between VAI and FPG was explored in diabetic patients receiving and not receiving antidiabetic treatment, respectively. The results showed that VAI was not associated with FPG in participants with diabetes no matter they received antidiabetic drugs or not (Table 4).

Table 4 Association between VAI and fasting plasma glucose, stratified by age, gender, diabetes, hypertension and hyperlipidemia
Full size table

Nonlinear relationship exploration between VAI and FPG

Generalized additive model (GAM) and smooth curve fitting analysis were performed to explore the nonlinear relationship between VAI and FPG. As presented in Fig. 2, a nonlinear association between VAI and FPG levels was observed after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, WC, SBP, DBP, HR, smoking, physical activity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, CKD, race, TG, TC, HDL-c, LDL-c, ALT and ALP. FPG displayed an increasing trend with the increasement of VAI. Furthermore, threshold effect analysis was conducted using two-piecewise linear regression, and 4.02 was identified as the inflection point. We observed a dramatically positive correlation between VAI and FPG when VAI was below 4.02 (β = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59–0.87, p < 0.0001), and the positive association between VAI and FPG also existed when VAI was higher than 4.02 (β = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07–0.40, p = 0.0063) (Table 5). The smooth curve fittings in different subgroups stratified by age, gender, diabetes and hypertension were shown in Fig. 3. Similarly, non-linear relationship between VAI and FPG in subgroups were observed except for non-diabetic patients.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between VAI and fasting plasma glucose

Full size image
Table 5 Threshold effect analysis of VAI on fasting plasma glucose using piece-wise linear regression
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between VAI and fasting plasma glucose, stratified by age (A), gender (B), diabetes (C) and hypertension (D)

Full size image

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of VAI for predicting FPG elevation

To further explore the predictive value of VAI for FPG elevation, participants were divided into elevated FPG group (FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L) and control FPG group (FPG < 7.0 mmol/L) according to the definition of diabetes. ROC curve analysis was performed to explore the predictive value of VAI for identifying FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (Fig. 4) after adjusting for age, gender, SBP, DBP, HR, smoking, physical activity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, stroke, CKD, race, TC, LDL-c, ALT and ALP. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.7169 (95% CI: 0.6948–0.7389), the cut-off value of VAI was 1.4315, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 64.03 and 69.90%, respectively. Additionally, accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratio were presented in Table 6.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The ROC analysis of VAI for predicting FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L

Full size image
Table 6 ROC performance of VAI for FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L
Full size table

Discussion

The current study assessed the association between a novel indicator of adiposity distribution and dysfunction, VAI, and FPG. We found that VAI was positivity associated with FPG level based on a large-scale NHANES enrolling 4437 participants. Multiple linear regression analysis showed VAI was independently risk indicator for FPG. An increase of one unit in VAI was associated with 0.52 mmol/L higher FPG level after adjusting confounding factors. As a categorical variable, 4th VAI quartile group was associated with 0.71 mmol/L higher FPG level compared with 1st VAI quartile group. We also observed a non-linear association between VAI and FPG in the whole population. Additionally, VAI had a good predictive value for assessment of FPG elevation. Therefore, VAI acts as a simple and accessible parameter, participants with increased VAI level should be paid close attention to, and further FPG is recommended to determine the presence of dysglycemia.

Obesity is one of leading established risk factors for T2DM [32]. Specifically, individuals with adiposity distributed around visceral organs (abdominal adiposity) were regarded at higher risk for suffering insulin resistance and diabetes compared with those with subcutaneous adiposity [33, 34]. A study based on Mendelian randomization approach further provided a causal association between visceral adiposity and T2DM using a surrogate indicator termed WHRadjBMI [35]. It is well recognized that computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are gold standards for quantitative detection of visceral adipose tissue, however, they are not proper methods for research and clinical use due its inconvenience and expense [36]. Therefore, Amato et al. established a gender-specific indicator for visceral adiposity assessment termed VAI on the basis of WC, BMI, TG and HDL [19]. Subsequently, several researches have revealed the association between VAI and diabetes. Data from China Health and Nutrition Survey suggested VAI was positively associated with the risk for developing diabetes, and VAI had the highest predictive diagnostic ability for diabetes compared with BMI and WC [37]. A cohort study from Jiangsu revealed that patients with highest VAI had 2.55-fold risk of suffering diabetes [38]. However, it remains largely unknown on the relationship between VAI and FPG.

This is the first report showing VAI was non-linearly independently associated with FPG level, and 4.02 was identified as the inflection point. FPG dramatically went up with the increase of FPG, and FPG remained a relatively mild upward trend when VAI was higher than 4.02. Consistently, Zhou et al. investigated the prospective relationship between VAI and new-onset IFG in hypertensive patients, and reported a higher risk of new-onset IFG in patients with quartile 4 VAI compared with those in quartile 1–3 [39].

Another research conducted in Mexican population proved VAI was independently associated with IFG and VAI had highest AUC for predicting IFG compared with TG and waist-to-hip ratio [40]. In contrast, VAI was found not positively associated with FPG in previous research conducted among Chinese individuals. Furthermore, another two surrogate indices lipid accumulation product index and cardiometabolic index showed superior ability in predicting IFG to VAI [41]. These differences might be attributed to different research population. Li enrolled nonobese individuals without diabetes, whereas we included participants regardless of their diabetes status and their WC and BMI levels. Our subgroup analysis showed VAI was not an independent risk indicator for FPG in patients without diabetes, which was consistent with previous findings [41].

We observed that the positive relationship between VAI and FPG remained stable in participants regardless of age, gender, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, indicating VAI could reflect more detrimental mechanisms beyond these classic risk factors. The potential mechanisms underlying VAI and FPG might include the following aspects: Excessive visceral fat promoted the secretion of increased inflammatory adipokine, including IL-6 and leptin, which might contribute to the occurrence of insulin resistance and diabetes [42]. Nasser et al. reported VAI was the only determinant factor of adiponectin, which was regarded as the sole protective adipokine with anti-diabetogenic property [43]. Visceral lipid accumulation in adipocytes induced cellular stress and activation of JNK signaling, contributing to increased pro-inflammatory cytokines production and increased acute phase protein synthesis in adipose tissue, subsequently resulting in decrease of glucose uptake, esterification and storage of free fatty acid, eventually leading to dysglycemia [44].

Previous researches have explored the optimal cut-off value of VAI for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and diabetes. Chen suggested VAI was significantly associated with MetS, and a VAI of 2.282 was calculated to determine the occurrence of MetS in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea [45]. Similar results were found in Sara’s research, and the optimal cut-off value of VAI for MetS identification was 1.775 in whole obese population [46]. The optimal cut-off value of VAI was 1.52 for detecting prediabetes and diabetes (AUC = 0.687) in a German population [47]. To date, few publications have explored the predictive value of VAI for elevated FPG. According to our results of ROC analysis, VAI had a good predictive value for FPG elevation (AUC = 0.7169, 95% CI: 0.6948–0.7389), and the cut-off value of VAI was 1.4315. The predictive potential of VAI for FPG elevation still need further verifications from studies in different population.

A large sample size is a strength in our study. However, some limitations need to be addressed: Firstly, we can only provide the association but not a causal relationship between VAI and FPG because NHANES is a cross-sectional observational study. Secondly, the indispensable data for the calculation of VAI and FPG were absent for some individuals, therefore, a large number of participants were excluded in the research, which might lead to selection bias. Finally, the cohort might not be representative of general population because all included participants were American.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the current study indicated a positively nonlinear relationship between VAI and FPG. VAI was an independent risk indicator for FPG and VAI had a good predictive value for elevated FPG. VAI might become a useful surrogate indicator for risk assessment and treatment of hyperglycemia in clinical practice.

Availability of data and materials

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

References

  1. Wang L, Gao P, Zhang M, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317(24):2515–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang L, Peng W, Zhao Z, et al. Prevalence and treatment of diabetes in China, 2013-2018. JAMA. 2021;326(24):2498–506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun H, Saeedi P, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022;183:109119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim MK, Han K, Koh ES, et al. Cumulative exposure to impaired fasting glucose and future risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;175:108799.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Palliyaguru DL, Shiroma EJ, Nam JK, et al. Fasting blood glucose as a predictor of mortality: lost in translation. Cell Metab. 2021;33(11):2189–200.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tirosh A, Shai I, Tekes-Manova D, et al. Normal fasting plasma glucose levels and type 2 diabetes in young men. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(14):1454–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang K, Niu J, Zuo T, et al. Alterations in the gut virome in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology. 2021;161(4):1257–69.e13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdullah A, Peeters A, de Courten M, Stoelwinder J. The magnitude of association between overweight and obesity and the risk of diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;89(3):309–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S, Li W, Qiao Y, et al. Abnormal glucose in pre-school children and the association with obesity/physical activity: a large population-based study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2021;37(7):e3442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neeland IJ, Ross R, Després JP, et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: a position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):715–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeBoer MD. Assessing and managing the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1788.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Levelt E, Pavlides M, Banerjee R, et al. Ectopic and visceral fat deposition in lean and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(1):53–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Karastergiou K. The interplay between sex, ethnicity, and adipose tissue characteristics. Curr Obes Rep. 2015;4(2):269–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baum T, Cordes C, Dieckmeyer M, et al. MR-based assessment of body fat distribution and characteristics. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(8):1512–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Piché ME, Tchernof A, Després JP. Obesity phenotypes, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases. Circ Res. 2020;126(11):1477–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan Y, Wang R, Ding L, et al. Waist circumference and its changes are more strongly associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes than body mass index and changes in body weight in Chinese adults. J Nutr. 2020;150(5):1259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a consensus statement from the IAS and ICCR working group on visceral obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020;16(3):177–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Amato MC, Giordano C, Galia M, et al. Visceral adiposity index: a reliable indicator of visceral fat function associated with cardiometabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):920–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kouli GM, Panagiotakos DB, Kyrou I, et al. Visceral adiposity index and 10-year cardiovascular disease incidence: the ATTICA study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;27(10):881–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu Y, Zhang FL, Yan XL, Zhang P, Guo ZN, Yang Y. Visceral adiposity index and cervical arterial atherosclerosis in northeast China: a population based cross-sectional survey. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(1):161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang M, Zheng L, Li P, et al. 4-year trajectory of visceral adiposity index in the development of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Ann Nutr Metab. 2016;69(2):142–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Oliveira CM, Pavani JL, Liu C, et al. Comparing different metabolic indexes to predict type 2 diabetes mellitus in a five years follow-up cohort: the Baependi heart study. PLoS One. 2022;17(6):e0267723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Z, Yu S, Kang X, et al. Association of visceral adiposity index with incident nephropathy and retinopathy: a cohort study in the diabetic population. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21(1):32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S13–s28.

  26. ALHarthi SSS, Natto ZS, Midle JB, Gyurko R, O'Neill R, Steffensen B. Association between time since quitting smoking and periodontitis in former smokers in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009 to 2012. J Periodontol. 2019;90(1):16–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mumba MN, Nacarrow AF, Cody S, et al. Intensity and type of physical activity predicts depression in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2021;25(4):664–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Parikh NS, Salehi Omran S, Kamel H, Elkind MSV, Willey J. Symptoms of depression and active smoking among survivors of stroke and myocardial infarction: an NHANES analysis. Prev Med. 2020;137:106131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun DQ, Jin Y, Wang TY, et al. MAFLD and risk of CKD. Metabolism. 2021;115:154433.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Du M, White E, Giovannucci EL. Trends in dietary supplement use among US adults from 1999-2012. JAMA. 2016;316(14):1464–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaddoe VW, de Jonge LL, Hofman A, Franco OH, Steegers EA, Gaillard R. First trimester fetal growth restriction and cardiovascular risk factors in school age children: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma RCW. Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetic complications in China. Diabetologia. 2018;61(6):1249–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vazquez G, Duval S, Jacobs DR Jr, Silventoinen K. Comparison of body mass index, waist circumference, and waist/hip ratio in predicting incident diabetes: a meta-analysis. Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:115–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham heart study. Circulation. 2007;116(1):39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Emdin CA, Khera AV, Natarajan P, et al. Genetic association of waist-to-hip ratio with cardiometabolic traits, type 2 diabetes, and coronary heart disease. JAMA. 2017;317(6):626–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Poonawalla AH, Sjoberg BP, Rehm JL, et al. Adipose tissue MRI for quantitative measurement of central obesity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37(3):707–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wei J, Liu X, Xue H, Wang Y, Shi Z. Comparisons of visceral adiposity index, body shape index, body mass index and waist circumference and their associations with diabetes mellitus in adults. Nutrients. 2019;11(7):1580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen C, Xu Y, Guo ZR, Yang J, Wu M, Hu XS. The application of visceral adiposity index in identifying type 2 diabetes risks based on a prospective cohort in China. Lipids Health Dis. 2014;13:108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhou C, Zhang Z, Liu M, et al. Association of visceral adiposity index with new-onset type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in hypertensive Chinese adults. Eat Weight Disord. 2022;27(2):505–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Elizalde-Barrera CI, Rubio-Guerra AF, Lozano-Nuevo JJ, Olvera-Gomez JL. Triglycerides and waist to height ratio are more accurate than visceral adiposity and body adiposity index to predict impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;153:49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li HH, Wang JM, Ji YX, et al. Association of visceral adiposity surrogates with impaired fasting glucose in nonobese individuals. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2020;18(3):128–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fontana L, Eagon JC, Trujillo ME, Scherer PE, Klein S. Visceral fat adipokine secretion is associated with systemic inflammation in obese humans. Diabetes. 2007;56(4):1010–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Attas OS, Alokail MS, et al. Visceral adiposity index is highly associated with adiponectin values and glycaemic disturbances. Eur J Clin Investig. 2013;43(2):183–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Koloverou E, Panagiotakos DB, Georgousopoulou EN, et al. Single and combined effects of inflammatory markers on 10 year diabetes incidence: the mediating role of adiposity-results from the ATTICA cohort study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(1):e2939.

  45. Chen GP, Qi JC, Wang BY, et al. Applicability of visceral adiposity index in predicting metabolic syndrome in adults with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. 2016;16:37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Vizzuso S, Del Torto A, Dilillo D, et al. Visceral adiposity index (VAI) in children and adolescents with obesity: no association with daily energy intake but promising tool to identify metabolic syndrome (MetS). Nutrients. 2021;13(2):413.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahn N, Baumeister SE, Amann U, et al. Visceral adiposity index (VAI), lipid accumulation product (LAP), and product of triglycerides and glucose (TyG) to discriminate prediabetes and diabetes. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the time and effort given by participants and research staff during the data collection phase of the NHANES project, we also thank CDC for publicizing the NHANES database.

Funding

The study was supported by the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82170433 and No. 81970237).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yuhan Qin and Yong Qiao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China

    Yuhan Qin, Yong Qiao, Dong Wang, Mingkang Li, Zhanneng Yang, Linqing Li, Gaoliang Yan & Chengchun Tang

Authors
  1. Yuhan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingkang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhanneng Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Linqing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gaoliang Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chengchun Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YHQ, YQ, and DW: study conception and design; YHQ, YQ, DW, MKL, ZNY, and LQL: data collection; YHQ, MKL, ZNY, and LQL: data analysis and interpretation; YHQ and YQ: manuscript writing and reviewing; GLY, and CCT: study supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gaoliang Yan or Chengchun Tang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participant

The program was approved by the National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board. All of the participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

They authors declare no potential conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qin, Y., Qiao, Y., Wang, D. et al. Visceral adiposity index is positively associated with fasting plasma glucose: a cross-sectional study from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–2020. BMC Public Health 23, 313 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15231-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15231-8

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us