Volume 17 Supplement 3

Urban Health at the Edge: A Series on Reproductive Health and HIV in Inner-City Johannesburg

Research
Open Access

Alcohol use and sexual risk behaviour among men and women in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa

  • Braimoh Bello1,
  • Harry Moultrie1,
  • Aleefia Somji1, 2,
  • Matthew F. Chersich1,
  • Charlotte Watts2 and
  • Sinead Delany-Moretlwe1Email author
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:4350

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4350-4

©  The Author(s). 2017

Published: 4 July 2017

Abstract

Background

Alcohol misuse is a key factor underlying the remarkable vulnerability to HIV infection among men and women in sub-Saharan Africa, especially within urban settings. Its effects, however, vary by type of drinking, population group and are modified by socio-cultural co-factors.

Methods

We interviewed a random sample of 1465 men living in single-sex hostels and 1008 women in adjacent informal settlements in inner-city, Johannesburg, South Africa. Being drunk in the past week was used as an indicator of heavy episodic drinking, and frequency of drinking and number of alcohol units/week used as measures of volume. Associations between dimensions of alcohol use (current drinking, volume of alcohol consumed and heavy episodic drinking patterns) and sexual behaviours were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Most participants were internal migrants from KwaZulu Natal province. About half of men were current drinkers, as were 13% of women. Of current male drinkers, 18% drank daily and 23% were drunk in the past week (women: 14% and 29% respectively). Among men, associations between heavy episodic drinking and sexual behaviour were especially pronounced. Compared with non-drinkers, episodic ones were 2.6 fold more likely to have transactional sex (95%CI = 1.7–4.1) and 2.2 fold more likely to have a concurrent partner (95%CI = 1.5–3.2). Alcohol use in men, regardless of measure, was strongly associated with having used physical force to have sex. Overall effects of alcohol on sexual behaviour were larger in women than men, and associations were detected between all alcohol measures in women, and concurrency, transactional sex and having been forced to have sex.

Conclusions

Alcohol use and sexual behaviours are strongly linked among male and female migrant populations in inner-city Johannesburg. More rigorous interventions at both local and macro level are needed to alleviate alcohol harms and mitigate the alcohol-HIV nexus, especially among already vulnerable groups. These should target the specific dimensions of alcohol use that are harmful, assist women who drink to do so more safely and address the linkages between alcohol and sexual violence.

Keywords

Alcohol use Sexual-risk behaviours HIV South Africa Heavy episodic drinking Migrant

Background

Alcohol misuse is frequently cited as being one of the key factors underlying the remarkable vulnerability to HIV infection in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa, especially in urban settings [1, 2]. Across the sub-continent, alcohol has been linked with HIV risk via unprotected sex [3], multiple sexual partnerships [4–6], transactional sex [4], and physical and sexual violence [7, 8]. A meta-analysis of 20 African studies showed that both male and female drinkers were about 1.5 fold more likely to be HIV-infected than non-drinkers [9]. This is consistent with global findings [10].

Associations between drinking and sexual behaviour are biologically plausible. Alcohol has psychoactive effects which can result in poor judgement, dampened reasoning skills and a reduction in one’s sense of responsibility [11]. Alcohol alters the brain’s gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors and changes the body’s serotonin levels, resulting in disinhibition – reducing anxiety about the consequences of one’s actions [12]. Assertions about alcohol and sexual behaviour causality are strengthened by studies demonstrating links between drinking contexts and the likelihood of sexual risk behaviours [13]. Meta-analyses have noted that certain drinking contexts, such as bars and other public spaces, portend unprotected sex [14]. Importantly, associations between alcohol and unsafe sex have been demonstrated in event-level data, which assesses alcohol use at the time of specific sexual events [15–17]. Taking all the evidence together, it is clear that associations between alcohol use and unsafe sexual behaviour (and consequent risk for HIV infection) are now well documented [18–21]. Key questions remain unanswered, however. Firstly, a better understanding is needed of the mediating or confounding effects of personality factors such as sensation seeking and impulsivity on the alcohol and sex relationship [22–24]. Secondly, additional evidence is needed across different settings to better elucidate which dimensions of alcohol use influence sexual behaviour, and the extent to which being male or female alters the relative effects of these different dimensions. These dimensions include total volume consumed, drinking patterns such as heavy episodic drinking, and alcohol abuse or dependence [25]. This knowledge will enable alcohol control strategies and specific interventions to reduce the harms of alcohol to be tailored to the particular aspects of alcohol use which are most harmful in each setting.

Levels of alcohol consumption and prevalence of HIV in South Africa rank among the highest in the world [26]. One-third of South Africans report heavy, episodic drinking [27] and rates are even higher in patients attending clinical services[28]. HIV prevalence in urban informal areas in the country is almost 20% [29]. HIV incidence is especially concerning among young migrants in urban and peri-urban settings [29], and alcohol problems pervade these communities, both historically and in more recent times [30–34]. These populations also face challenges in accessing health services and other positive determinants of health including housing and employment [35]. Linkages between alcohol and sexual behaviours in these marginalized groups have, however, not been examined in sufficient detail.

We analysed data from a population-based study among men living in hostels and women inhabiting adjacent informal settlements in inner-city Johannesburg, South Africa, to determine the extent to which alcohol use influences sexual behaviours, and to identify which features of alcohol use have most impact in this population. Data on this population are especially important as the majority are internal migrants (from other parts of South Africa), a key group in the South African HIV epidemic [36, 37].

Methods

Study design, population and procedures

The survey, undertaken from January to November 2004, formed part of the initial activities done prior to an intervention project that aimed to improve access to health services for males in single-sex hostels and surrounding informal settlements. The hostels, within Region F, south-eastern Johannesburg, were built in barrack style, and originally created by mining companies to accommodate men from rural areas at minimal cost. They are typically overcrowded, unsafe and lack amenities [38]. After mine closures in the early 1990s, the hostels were occupied largely by unemployed migrants from other parts of South Africa, rather than miners [39]. Shack dwellings often sprung up adjacent to the single-sex hostels and are mostly occupied by women and children.

A community mapping preceded the survey to help understand the layout of the study setting and services in the area. Also, a trained fieldworker spent several nights in a hostel carrying out ethnographic fieldwork in the form of participant observation to provide detailed information on daily life within the hostels, information that was used to formulate the sampling strategy.

Men and women aged 18–55, and resident in the area for at least three months, were eligible for enrolment. A representative sample was obtained through a two-stage sampling process. For men, the first stage entailed random sampling of sleeping units within five hostels (five of the six hostels in the area participated), with the number selected per hostel proportionate to hostel size. Thereafter, in an effort to minimise effects of clustering (for example, where men in each sleeping unit were similar to each other and different from other men), 10% of eligible men in the selected units were sampled. For women, the initial stage was a systematic selection of 10% of all dwellings from a random starting point in the informal settlements. All eligible women in the selected dwelling were then invited to participate. Both informal settlements and hostels were visited several times to maximise participation.

Data were collected through face-to-face interviews in either IsiZulu or Sotho. Informed consent was obtained prior to study procedures.

Exposure and outcome measures

Alcohol use was assessed in three domains: any alcohol use, volume consumed and heavy episodic drinking patterns [40, 41]. Men or women reporting that they drink alcohol were classified as having any alcohol use. Volume of alcohol consumed was measured by two variables: the frequency of drinking and the total number of standard drinks (10 g/drink) in the past week. The latter was categorised as no drinking, moderate drinking (men: 1–14 drinks, women: 1–7 drinks), problem drinking (men: 15–21 drinks, women: 8–14 drinks) or heavy drinking (men: >21 drinks, women: >14 drinks). The limits for units in the past week are those commonly used to define ‘safe’ alcohol use in non-pregnant adults [42, 43]. Drinking frequency was used as a measure of volume drank as is commonly done [40], whereby cumulative lifetime volume is estimated by a product of drinking frequency and number of units per drinking session. To measure heavy episodic drinking, participants were asked whether they had been drunk in the past week.

Other exposure variables assessed included socio-demographics and health status. Age was categorised as 18–24 years, 25–34 years and ≥35 years. Social cohesion was defined as how close participants felt to others around them (men with other hostels dwellers and women with those in the surrounding informal settlement). This was measured using a Likert scale with five levels, extending from ‘very close’ to ‘not very close’. Perceived safety was also measured using a Likert scale, ranging from ‘very safe’ to ‘very unsafe’. To assess exposure to violence, participants were asked when was the last time they had witnessed violence, with responses classified into whether or not this had occurred in the past three months. Perceived risk for HIV infection was determined by asking participants ‘What do you think your chances of getting HIV/AIDS are?’, again measured with a Likert scale, as is commonly done for this indicator [44]. Health status was also measured using a Likert scale from ‘very good’ to ‘poor’.

Sexual risk behaviours, the study outcomes, were assessed through four binary measures. Condom use at last sex, regardless of type of partner; concurrent partnerships (more than one sexual partner at time of survey); transactional sex (men who ever paid for or gave goods for sex, and women who were ever paid or received goods for sex); and sexual violence, measured among men as ever having used physical force to have sex, or among women as ever been forced to have sex.

Statistical analyses

Stata version 13.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for analysis. We summarized the data using means and proportions. Differences between categorical variables were identified using chi-square tests and between ordinal categorical variables using the chi-square test for trend. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to determine whether current drinking, volume consumed and heavy episodic drinking were associated with the four sexual risk behaviour measures defined above. Non-drinkers were used as the reference group in all models. Each model adjusted for age and income, based on a directed acyclic graph for total effect of alcohol consumption on high risk sexual behaviour.

In a post hoc analysis, we described the socio-demographic and other characteristics of the groups of men and women whose drinking patterns were associated with high-risk sexual behaviours. The decision about which group to profile was made on the basis of the multivariate results. In those results, for men, associations between heavy episodic alcohol use (having felt drunk in the past week) and sexual behaviour were more consistent and larger than those for the other indicators of alcohol use. We thus examined the characteristics of men with heavy episodic drinking, aiming to profile those requiring interventions. Among women, we assessed the characteristics of current drinkers, as most female drinkers had high-risk drinking patterns and associations between current drinking and sexual behaviour outcomes were similar to those for the other alcohol variables. Throughout, separate analyses were performed for men and women, as patterns of associations between the exposures and outcomes differed by gender, which is widely acknowledged to be an important modifier of the relationship between alcohol use and sexual behaviour [25, 45].

Results

Characteristics of study population

Of males eligible for the survey, 94% enrolled (1465/1559), while only 87% of women did (991/1133). Fifty men and seven women reported never having had vaginal, oral or anal sex and were excluded from analysis. Large differences were observed between men and women for all socio-demographic characteristics compared (all P values for comparisons between men and women were <0.001). The mean age of males was 28 years, 86% were single and the large majority were born in KwaZulu Natal (94%; Table 1). Only a third of men had completed secondary school, 5% had never been to school and a further 11% had not finished primary education. Females were on average 29 years old and predominately single (93%). They were mostly from KwaZulu Natal (76%), but 19% hailed from other provinces. Women had even lower education levels than men (12% had never attended school and the same percentage had not completed primary education).
Table 1

Sociodemographic characteristics, alcohol use and sexual behaviours of men and women in inner-city Johannesburg

 

Men (N = 1465)

Women (N = 991)

P

 

Number

%

Number

%

 

Age group (years)

 18–24

560

38.5

360

36.3

 

 25–34

681

46.8

419

42.3

 

  ≥ 35

215

14.8

212

21.4

<0.001

Place of birth

 Gauteng

9

0.6

45

4.6

 

 KwaZulu Natal

1353

94.3

747

75.5

 

 Other provinces

72

5.0

187

18.9

 

 Outside South Africa

1

0.1

10

1.0

<0.001

Completed secondary school

 Yes

473

32.9

224

22.6

<0.001

Married

 Yes

201

14.0

71

7.2

<0.001

Employed

 Yes

631

43.9

236

23.8

<0.001

Income per month (USD)

 0–9

661

46.2

580

58.9

 

 10–99

225

15.7

246

25.0

 

 100–199

178

12.4

106

10.8

 

  ≥ 200

368

25.7

53

5.4

<0.001

Currently smoke

666

46.4

63

6.4

<0.001

Current alcohol usea

686

47.7

124

12.5

<0.001

Frequency of drinking

 None in past week

1036

75.3

912

93.7

 

 Once a week

173

12.6

31

3.2

 

 Several days a week

54

3.9

14

1.4

 

 Daily

113

8.2

16

1.6

<0.001

Drinking volume in past weekb

 None in past week

1037

75.9

912

93.9

 

 Moderate drinking

108

7.9

14

1.4

 

 Problem drinking

59

4.3

11

1.1

 

 Heavy drinking

163

11.9

34

3.5

<0.001

Having felt drunk in past week

 Not a current drinker

752

55.1

858

87.4

 

 No, but are current drinkers

472

34.6

90

9.2

 

 Yes, felt drunk

141

10.3

34

3.5

<0.001

Ever sex under influence of alcohol

537

37.5

73

7.4

<0.001

Sexual risk behaviors

 Condom use last sex

293

21.4

224

23.0

0.37

 Concurrent partners

670

48.1

56

5.7

<0.001

 Transactional sex

207

14.7

68

7.0

<0.001

 Sexual violencec

98

7.0

165

16.8

<0.001

aRespondents who say they drink alcohol. bModerate drinking: men: 1–14 drinks, women: 1–7 drinks; Problem drinking: men 15–21 drinks, women: 8–14 drinks; Heavy drinking: men >21 drinks, women >14 drinks. 1 USD = 6 South Africa Rand. Totals vary due to missing data. cMen who used physical force to have sex and women having been forced to have sex. P values compare the distribution in men and women, and are based on chi-square tests

Only 44% of males were employed, and these had a median income of USD 200 per month (IQR = 100–300; 1 USD = 6 South Africa Rand). Even fewer women were employed than men (23%) and their median monthly income was half that of men (USD 100, IQR = 44–163). Men shared their room in the barracks-style hostels with a median eight other men (IQR = 4–13), while women had a median of two companions in their tin shacks (IQR = 1–3).

Patterns of alcohol use

Among men, 48% reported current alcohol use. As many as 16% of all men had problem/heavy drinking (>14 units/week) and 10% had been drunk in the past week. Of the 686 men who drink, 18% drank alcohol daily and almost a quarter had been drunk in the past week (23%). Men mostly drank beer, a median of 9 units a week (IQR = 7–14).

As with socio-demographic comparisons by gender, all differences between alcohol use in men and in women were large (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). Fewer women reported current drinking (13%). However, alcohol use patterns among the 124 women who did drink were especially concerning: 14% drank daily, 29% had been drunk in the past week, and female drinkers consumed a median 7 units a week (IQR = 5–9).

Sexual risk behaviours and associations with alcohol use

Among the men surveyed, only 21% reported having used a condom at last intercourse. Half the men said they presently had a concurrent sexual partnership (48%), 15% ever had transactional sex and 7% admitted having forced a woman to have sex. Compared with men, a similar proportion of women reported condom use at last sex (23%; P = 0.37), but much fewer women reported concurrency or transactional sex (about 6–7% for both measures; P < 0.001), and 17% had experienced sexual violence.

In both sexes, none of the alcohol measures were associated with condom use at last sex (Table 2). Consequently, the remaining text in this section pertains only to the other three sexual behaviours assessed. In both men and women, though there was some evidence that alcohol use was associated with sexual behaviour in a dose-dependent manner (for example, heavy episodic drinking and concurrent partners in men, and drinking in the past week and sexual violence among women), on the whole such associations were not evident.
Table 2

Multivariate logistic regression models of association between different measures of alcohol use and sexual risk behaviour, by gender

Measures of alcohol use

No condom use at last sex

Concurrent partnership

Transactional sex

Sexual violencec

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

MEN (n = 1485)

 Current alcohol usea

  No

1

1

1

1

  Yes

0.92 (0.71–1.19)

1.60 (1.29–1.98)

1.52 (1.13–2.06)

2.26 (1.46–3.51)

Frequency of drinking

 Non-drinker

1

1

1

1

 Never in past week

1.05 (0.73–1.50)

1.56 (1.17–2.08)

1.13 (0.74–1.72)

2.37 (1.38–4.05)

 Once a week

0.89 (0.59–1.36)

1.65 (1.17–2.34)

1.70 (1.08–2.69)

1.72 (0.86–3.43)

  > 1 once a week

0.71 (0.48–1.06)

1.66 (1.17–2.36)

1.81 (1.15–2.85)

3.35 (1.85–6.06)

Drinking in past weekb

 None in past week

1

1

1

1

 Moderate drinking

0.79 (0.49–1.27)

1.60 (1.06–2.43)

1.36 (0.78–2.37)

1.37 (0.63–2.98)

 Problem or heavy use

0.76 (0.53–1.09)

1.46 (1.08–1.99)

1.91 (1.30–2.82)

2.10 (1.25–3.51)

Having felt drunk in past week

 Not a current drinker

1

1

1

1

 No, but are current drinkers

0.92 (0.69–1.23)

1.47 (1.16–1.87)

1.17 (0.82–1.66)

2.10 (1.29–3.38)

 Yes, felt drunk

0.82 (0.53–1.28)

2.18 (1.49–3.21)

2.62 (1.67–4.11)

4.74 (2.02–6.93)

WOMEN (n = 1008)

 Current alcohol usea

  No

1

1

1

1

  Yes

0.83 (0.54–1.29)

4.05 (2.23–7.34)

5.94 (3.48–10.1)

3.21 (2.11–4.89)

Frequency of drinking

 Non-drinker

1

1

1

1

 Never in past week

0.74 (0.40–1.36)

4.74 (2.13–10.5)

5.33 (2.59–11.0)

1.98 (1.04–3.75)

 Once a week

1.81 (0.62–5.30)

2.06 (0.59–7.27)

6.11 (2.29–16.3)

6.09 (2.86–13.0)

  > 1 once a week

-

4.82 (1.71–13.5)

6.18 (2.48–15.4)

2.95 (1.34–6.50)

Drinking volume in past weekb

 None in past week

1

1

1

1

 Moderate drinking

1.04 (0.28–3.83)

1.34 (0.17–10.7)

3.22 (0.68–15.3)

2.64 (0.80–8.68)

 Problem or heavy use

0.97 (0.47–2.02)

-

5.91 (2.78–12.6)

4.44 (2.37–8.30)

Having felt drunk in past week

 Not a current drinker

1

1

1

1

 No, but are current drinkers

0.86 (0.51–1.45)

4.60 (2.35–8.99)

5.81 (3.12–10.8)

2.84 (1.71–4.71)

 Yes, felt drunk

0.90 (0.40–2.04)

2.19 (0.63–7.56)

5.43 (2.20–13.4)

3.31 (1.59–6.91)

aRespondents who say they drink alcohol. AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval. All models adjusted for age and income based on directed acyclic graph for total effect of alcohol consumption on high-risk sexual behaviour. bModerate drinking: men: 1–14 drinks, women: 1–7 drinks; Problem or heavy drinking: men ≥15 drinks, women: ≥8 drinks. cMen who used physical force to have sex and women having been forced to have sex. Bold AORs are those where P < 0.05. – Sample too small to give an estimate of this adjusted association

Among men, the effect sizes of associations between heavy episodic drinking (having felt drunk in the past week) and sexual behaviour were larger than the effect sizes for the other three measures of drinking (current drinking; frequency of drinking in the past week; and number of alcohol units in the past week). For example, compared with non-drinkers, the odds of having transactional sex were 2.6 fold higher in men with heavy episodic drinking (95% CI = 1.7–4.1), while they were only 1.8 fold in men who drank more than once a week (95% CI = 1.2–2.9). Also of note, for men, associations between alcohol use and having used physical force to have sex were significant with all four alcohol measures, and these effect sizes were larger than that for the other sexual behaviours. Importantly, the odds of perpetrating sexual violence was 4.7 fold higher in men who reported heavy episodic drinking than those who do not drink (95% CI = 2.0–6.9).

With all four alcohol indicators, drinking in females was associated with concurrent partnerships, transactional sex and having been forced to have sex. The point estimates of these associations were high: odds of the sexual behaviours outcomes (other than condom use) were above 5 for 8 of the 24 odd ratios calculated. Odds of transactional sex in the different drinking groups were higher than the odds for the associations between alcohol and the other sexual behaviours assessed in women. Importantly, the odds of the three unsafe sexual behaviours among females who currently drink were 3.2 to 5.9 fold higher than non-drinkers. These figures were similar to those for the other three alcohol variables in most of the associations examined.

Factors associated with heavy episodic drinking in men and current drinking in women

The proportion of men with heavy episodic drinking rose with each increase in age group, from 6% in men 18–24 years up to 16% in those older than 35 (P < 0.001), but episodic drinking was not linked to place of birth or education level (Table 3). Being employed and having an income above 10 USD/month was associated with heavy episodic drinking among men. Levels of heavy episodic drinking were 13% in men who had witnessed violence and 9% in those who had not (P = 0.02). Rates of heavy episodic drinking were much higher in men who perceived themselves as having a high risk for acquiring HIV (20%), than those who had a low perceived risk (7%; P < 0.001). Health status was not associated with heavy episodic drinking in men, but 16% of those who smoke reported heavy episodic drinking, higher than non-smokers.
Table 3

Factors associated with heavy episodic drinking in men and current alcohol use among women in inner-city Johannesburg

 

Male heavy episodic drinking (n = 141)

Female current drinkers (n = 124)

 

Number

Row %

P

Number

Row %

P

Age group (years)

 18–24

32

6.2

<0.001a

33

9.2

0.03a

 25–34

77

12.1

59

14.1

  ≥ 35

32

15.6

32

15.1

Place of birth

 Gauteng

0

0.0

0.70

10

22.2

<0.001

 KwaZulu Natal

131

10.3

73

9.8

 Other provinces

8

12.3

40

21.4

 Outside South Africa

0

0.0

0

0.0

Completed secondary school

 No

99

10.9

0.36

115

15.0

<0.001

 Yes

41

9.3

9

4.0

Married

 No

119

10.2

0.71

117

12.7

0.48

 Yes

21

11.1

7

9.9

Has children

 No

38

7.6

0.01

19

11.4

0.65

 Yes

102

12.0

105

12.7

Employed

      

 No

65

8.6

0.03

98

13.0

0.42

 Yes

74

12.3

26

11.0

Income per month (USD)

 0–9

38

6.1

 

74

12.8

 

 10–99

33

15.7

<0.001a

32

13.0

0.76a

 100–199

23

13.9

11

10.4

  ≥ 200

47

13.2

7

13.2

Perceived social cohesion

 Very close

79

10.9

0.39a

48

12.6

0.96a

 Close

50

9.0

60

12.6

 Indifferent/not close

11

12.8

16

12.8

Perceived safety

      

 Safe or very safe

25

8.1

0.16a

29

9.8

0.22a

 Unsafe

63

10.0

64

14.1

 Very unsafe

51

12.4

31

13.1

Witnessed violence in past 3 months

 No

90

9.1

0.02

94

11.8

0.09

 Yes

50

13.4

30

16.4

Ever had HIV test

    

 No

18

13.1

0.23

38

9.4

0.01

 Yes

121

9.9

86

14.9

Perceived risk of acquiring HIV

 No risk at all

44

7.4

<0.001a

35

12.9

0.87a

 Some risk

60

10.5

53

12.2

 High risk

35

19.6

35

12.4

Current smoker

 No

40

5.5

<0.001

82

8.9

<0.001

 Yes

100

16.1

40

63.5

Health status

    

 Very good

31

12.4

0.46a

19

9.0

0.004a

 Good or fair

88

9.7

68

11.8

 Poor

22

10.6

37

18.7

STI symptoms in past 6 months

 No

110

10.1

0.58

44

9.8

0.016

 Yes

31

11.2

80

14.8

1 USD = 6 South Africa Rand. Row percentages are presented, which in men is the proportion of each subgroup who had been drunk in the past week, and in women is the proportion who currently drink in each subgroup. STI sexually transmitted infection. aChi-square test for trend (the remainder are chi-square tests). Totals vary due to missing data

Only 9% of women aged 18–24 were current drinkers, while rates were 14–15% in older age groups (P < 0.001). Rates of drinking in women from KwaZulu Natal (10%) were half that of women from Gauteng and other provinces (P < 0.001). Only 4% of women who completed secondary school currently drink, compared to 15% of those with less education (P < 0.001). In women, current drinking was not associated with perceived risk for HIV. Rates of current drinking rose with a decline in health status (9% in those with very good health, 12% in good or fair health and 19% in those with poor health; P = 0.004). Lastly, women with STI symptoms were more likely to drink alcohol than those without such symptoms (15% versus 10%; P = 0.016).

Discussion

This study among men and women who are mostly internal migrants and at high risk for HIV [29], showed that alcohol use is associated with unsafe sexual behaviours in this population, though patterns of associations differ between genders. Being drunk in the past week was the strongest predictor of perpetrating sexual violence in men and of unsafe sexual behaviours more generally. On the whole, alcohol consumption was even more strongly associated with sexual risk behaviour among women than in men. Odds of the three unsafe sexual behaviours among females who currently drink were 3.2 to 5.9 fold higher than non-drinkers, while the corresponding odds were only 1.6 to 2.3 in their male peers. Clearly, this population, with notable levels of socio-economic vulnerability, is marked by very high levels of alcohol and sexual risk behaviours.

As in other studies in South Africa [46, 47], considerably fewer women than men drink, but women who do have especially harmful drinking patterns, which are often characterised by frequent heavy drinking episodes. Moreover, the high unemployment rate and considerably lower income among females may mean that those who drink have to depend on men for alcohol. Older men who had an income were much more likely to drink than younger unemployed men, and thus were probably able to purchase drinks for women and offer them transactional sex. The very strong association between transactional sex and alcohol use supports the assertion that alcohol is linked with sexual and other exchanges between men and women in this population [13, 48, 49]. In one study in Cape Town, South Africa, women with food insecurity had higher sexual risk behaviours than other women, with the associations between food and risky sex being fully mediated through women’s alcohol use [49]. Also, that drinking in females per se, rather than type of drinking as in men, was associated with sexual behaviour, suggests that being present in a drinking venue may be the key risk for women, rather than the degree to which they engage with alcohol [48]. In fact, few of the associations showed a dose-dependent relationship between alcohol use in men and sexual behaviour, though such associations have been demonstrated previously [50–52].

The juxtaposition of single-sex male hostels and adjacent to informal settlements populated by impoverished women likely means that informal drinking venues in the areas (also called shebeens) play a key role in building social cohesion and cementing connections between these populations. Opportunities for drinking and for sexual encounters often co-exist in particular physical locations and the social dynamics that are generated in these locations [13, 53]. Patrons of drinking venues similar to those in the study site reported entering these places with an expectation of securing casual sex [3]. Sexual partners found at these drinking venues are more likely to have multiple sexual partners and to engage in unprotected sex than partners met elsewhere [54, 55]. These drinking venues are also often physically unsafe [38], perhaps accounting for the high levels of violence witnessed by drinkers in our study.

The linkages between alcohol use among men and using force to have sex, consistent with findings elsewhere [5, 56, 57], warrant discussion. Among males, both heavy alcohol use and sexual conquest may serve as markers of masculinity, which taken to their extremes can extend into sexual violence [58]. Drinking venues that encourage heavy alcohol consumption may thus propagate the social norms that underlie coercion and gender-based imbalances in sexual relationships [48]. Clearly, the links between alcohol and the perpetration of sexual violence, in itself, warrants stronger efforts to control alcohol use in South Africa.

The associations noted in the study between alcohol use and sexual behaviour may be accounted for by sex-related alcohol expectancies [59]. These are the anticipated effects of drinking alcohol, such as increased sexual pleasure and sexual riskiness, which then predict the likelihood of these consequences actually taking place [23, 60, 61]. Alcohol outcome expectancies were not studied in this population, but, potentially, the men and women who believed that alcohol would increase their sexual riskiness, may well have acted out those beliefs, which accounts for their high levels of concurrency and transactional sex. That we did not detect an association between alcohol and condom use might be due to the use of a weak indicator of condom use in the study, but also may reflect the mixed findings noted in other reports of associations between condom use and alcohol, with a few studies actually finding higher condom use among drinkers [51, 62]. Clearly, prospective data based on event–level indicators such as condom use while feeling drunk or after drinking are better suited to elucidating causal pathways between alcohol use and unsafe sex [63, 64].

Study limitations

The cross-sectional nature of this analysis limits the ability to infer causal associations between alcohol use and sexual risk. For example, women who are victims of sexual violence may drink as a means of coping, rather than having experienced rape as a result of drinking. Also, the settings in which drinking takes place were not assessed; they are key mediators of linkages between alcohol use and sexual behaviour. Further, data on drinking and sexual behaviours were self-reported, and thus subject to recall, social desirability and other biases. However, the consistent nature of the findings across a range of alcohol and sexual behaviour measures suggests that the results are valid, despite these limitations.

Conclusions

Compared with the general population, the effects of alcohol on sexual behaviours are especially heightened among high-risk populations, such as sex workers and men who have sex with men [63]. This study suggests that these effects also hold true for high-risk male and female migrant groups in inner-city areas. More rigorous interventions, at both local and macro level, are needed to alleviate alcohol harms and to tackle the alcohol-HIV nexus, especially among already vulnerable groups. These should target the specific dimensions of alcohol use that are harmful (such as heavy episodic drinking in men), assist women who drink to do so in a safer manner and address the linkages between alcohol and sexual violence.

Abbreviations

HIV: 

Human Immunodeficiency virus+

IQR: 

Inter-quartile range

USD: 

US Dollars

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the participants, the City of Johannesburg, Jillian Gardner, Witness Moyo, Thulani Mbatha, Sibusiso Mweli and Monique Oliff for their contributions to this study, and Abigail Hatcher who provided comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Funding

The survey was supported by a grant from the European Commission. SDM and CW were supported in part by a grant from the UK Department for International Development to the STRIVE Research Programme Consortium (Ref: Po 5244). However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the Department’s official policies. WRHI Research Capacity Building funds were used to fund the publications charges for the supplement.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

SD designed the study and supervised the implementation. BB analysed the data with assistance from AS. BB, SD, MC and AS interpreted the data and prepared the manuscript. AS, HM and CW provided critical comments on earlier drafts. All authors approved the final draft.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand approved the study.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of BMC Public Health Volume 17 Supplement 3, 2017: Urban Health at the Edge: A Series on Reproductive Health and HIV in inner-city Johannesburg. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-17-supplement-3.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Wits RHI, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand
(2)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

References

  1. Fritz K, Morojele N, Kalichman S. Alcohol: the forgotten drug in HIV/AIDS. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):398–400.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Schneider M, Chersich M, Neuman M, Parry C. Alcohol consumption and HIV/AIDS: the neglected interface. Addiction. 2012;Google Scholar
  3. Morojele NK, Kachieng'a MA, Mokoko E, Nkoko MA, Parry CD, Nkowane AM, Moshia KM, Saxena S. Alcohol use and sexual behaviour among risky drinkers and bar and shebeen patrons in Gauteng province, South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(1):217–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Woolf-King SE, Maisto SA. Alcohol use and high-risk sexual behavior in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(1):17–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Simbayi LC, Kalichman SC, Jooste S, Mathiti V, Cain D, Cherry C. Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV infection among men and women receiving sexually transmitted infection clinic services in Cape Town, South Africa. J Stud Alcohol. 2004;65(4):434–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Weiser SD, Leiter K, Heisler M, McFarland W, Percy-de Korte F, DeMonner SM, Tlou S, Phaladze N, Iacopino V, Bangsberg DR. A population-based study on alcohol and high-risk sexual behaviors in Botswana. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Zablotska IB, Gray RH, Koenig MA, Serwadda D, Nalugoda F, Kigozi G, Sewankambo N, Lutalo T, Wabwire Mangen F, Wawer M. Alcohol use, intimate partner violence, sexual coercion and HIV among women aged 15-24 in Rakai, Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(2):225–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mthembu JC, Khan G, Mabaso ML, Simbayi LC. Intimate partner violence as a factor associated with risky sexual behaviours and alcohol misuse amongst men in South Africa. AIDS Care. 2016;28(9):1132–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher JC, Bang H, Kapiga SH. The association between HIV infection and alcohol use: a systematic review and meta-analysis of African studies. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(11):856–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baliunas D, Rehm J, Irving H, Shuper P. Alcohol consumption and risk of incident human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2010;55(3):159–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rehm J, Shield KD, Joharchi N, Shuper PA. Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addiction. 2012;107(1):51–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shuper PA, Neuman M, Kanteres F, Baliunas D, Joharchi N, Rehm J. Causal considerations on alcohol and HIV/AIDS--a systematic review. Alcohol Alcohol. 2010;45(2):159–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nkosi S, Rich EP, Morojele NK. Alcohol use, sexual relationship power, and unprotected sex among patrons in bars and taverns in rural areas of north west province, South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(11):2230–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shuper PA, Joharchi N, Irving H, Rehm J. Alcohol as a correlate of unprotected sexual behavior among people living with HIV/AIDS: review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1021–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis KC, Hendershot CS, George WH, Norris J, Heiman JR. Alcohol’s effects on sexual decision making: an integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(6):843–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiene SM, Simbayi LC, Abrams A, Cloete A, Tennen H, Fisher JD. High rates of unprotected sex occurring among HIV-positive individuals in a daily diary study in South Africa: the role of alcohol use. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(2):219–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Delgado JR, Segura ER, Lake JE, Sanchez J, Lama JR, Clark JL. Event-level analysis of alcohol consumption and condom use in partnership contexts among men who have sex with men and transgender women in lima, Peru. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;170:17–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morojele NK, Kekwaletswe CT, Nkosi S. Associations between alcohol use, other psychosocial factors, structural factors and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence among south African ART recipients. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(3):519–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nkosi S, Sikweyiya Y, Kekwaletswe CT, Morojele NK. Male circumcision, alcohol use and unprotected sex among patrons of bars and taverns in rural areas of north-west province, South Africa. AIDS Care. 2015;27(5):612–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams EC, Hahn JA, Saitz R, Bryant K, Lira MC, Samet JH. Alcohol use and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: current knowledge, implications, and future directions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(10):2056–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott-Sheldon LA, Carey KB, Cunningham K, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Alcohol use predicts sexual decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental literature. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(Suppl 1):S19–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hendershot CS, Stoner SA, George WH, Norris J. Alcohol use, expectancies, and sexual sensation seeking as correlates of HIV risk behavior in heterosexual young adults. Psychol Addict Behav. 2007;21(3):365–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalichman SC, Cain D, Zweben A, Swain G. Sensation seeking, alcohol use and sexual risk behaviors among men receiving services at a clinic for sexually transmitted infections. J Stud Alcohol. 2003;64(4):564–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Shuper PA, Joharchi N, Rehm J. Personality as a predictor of unprotected sexual behavior among people living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2014;18(2):398–410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chersich MF, Rees HV. Causal links between binge drinking patterns, unsafe sex and HIV in South Africa: its time to intervene. Int J STD AIDS. 2010;21(1):2–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S, Thavorncharoensap M, Teerawattananon Y, Patra J. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet. 2009;373(9682):2223–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Peltzer K, Ramlagan S. Alcohol use trends in South Africa. J Social Sci. 2009;18:1–12.Google Scholar
  28. Leickness C, DPhil S, PhD SCK, Cain D, Cherry C, Jooste S, Mathiti V. Alcohol and risks for HIV/AIDS among sexually transmitted infection clinic patients in Cape Town, South Africa. Subst Abus. 2007;27(4):37–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Shisana O, Rehle T, Simbayi L, Zuma K, Jooste S, Zungu N, Labadarios D, Onoya D, et al. South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. Cape Town: HSRC Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  30. Parry CD, Myers B, Morojele NK, Flisher AJ, Bhana A, Donson H, Pluddemann A. Trends in adolescent alcohol and other drug use: findings from three sentinel sites in South Africa (1997-2001). J Adolesc. 2004;27(4):429–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Barnighausen T, Tanser F, Gqwede Z, Mbizana C, Herbst K, Newell ML. High HIV incidence in a community with high HIV prevalence in rural South Africa: findings from a prospective population-based study. AIDS. 2008;22(1):139–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Karim QA, Kharsany AB, Frohlich JA, Werner L, Mashego M, Mlotshwa M, Madlala BT, Ntombela F, Abdool Karim SS. Stabilizing HIV prevalence masks high HIV incidence rates amongst rural and urban women in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(4):922–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kranzer K, van Schaik N, Karmue U, Middelkoop K, Sebastian E, Lawn SD, Wood R, Bekker LG. High prevalence of self-reported undiagnosed HIV despite high coverage of HIV testing: a cross-sectional population based sero-survey in South Africa. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25244.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Lurie MN, Williams BG, Zuma K, Mkaya-Mwamburi D, Garnett G, Sturm AW, Sweat MD, Gittelsohn J, Abdool Karim SS. The impact of migration on HIV-1 transmission in South Africa: a study of migrant and nonmigrant men and their partners. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(2):149–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vearey J. Learning from HIV: exploring migration and health in South Africa. Global public health. 2012;7(1):58–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vearey J, Richter M, Nunez L, Moyo K. South African HIV/AIDS programming overlooks migration, urban livelihoods, and informal workplaces. Afr J AIDS Res. 2011;10(Suppl 1):381–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zuma K, Gouws E, Williams B, Lurie M. Risk factors for HIV infection among women in Carletonville, South Africa: migration, demography and sexually transmitted diseases. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14(12):814–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Minnaar A. Communities in isolation perspectives on hostels in South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council; 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Vearey J. Hidden spaces and urban health: exploring the tactics of rural migrants navigating the City of gold. Urban Forum. 2010;21(1):37–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. WHO: WHO: Global Information System on Alcohol and Health. 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT. The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2003;98(9):1209–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. UK Department of Health. UK Chief Medical Officers’ Low Risk Drinking Guidelines. 2016.Google Scholar
  43. The Guardian. How do the UK's new alcohol guidelines compare with the rest of the world?. 2016.Google Scholar
  44. Napper LE, Fisher DG, Reynolds GL. Development of the perceived risk of HIV scale. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(4):1075–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Kaufman M, Cain D, Jooste S. Alcohol use and sexual risks for HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review of empirical findings. Prev Sci. 2007;8(2):141–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Parry CD, Pluddemann A, Steyn K, Bradshaw D, Norman R, Laubscher R. Alcohol use in South Africa: findings from the first demographic and health survey (1998). J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(1):91–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Department of Health, Medical Research Council, OrcMacro. South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Pretoria: Department of Health; 2007.Google Scholar
  48. Townsend L, Ragnarsson A, Mathews C, Johnston LG, Ekstrom AM, Thorson A, Chopra M. “taking care of business”: alcohol as currency in transactional sexual relationships among players in Cape Town, South Africa. Qual Health Res. 2011;21(1):41–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Eaton LA, Cain DN, Pitpitan EV, Carey KB, Carey MP, Mehlomakulu V, Simbayi LC, Mwaba K, Kalichman SC. Exploring the relationships among food insecurity, alcohol use, and sexual risk taking among men and women living in south African townships. J Prim Prev. 2014;35(4):255–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Schneider M, Chersich M, Neuman M, Parry C. Alcohol consumption and HIV/AIDS: the neglected interface. Addiction. 2012;107(8):1369–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Fisher JC, Cook PA, Sam NE, Kapiga SH. Patterns of alcohol use, problem drinking, and HIV infection among high-risk African women. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35(6):537–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Chersich MF, Bosire W, King'ola N, Temmerman M, Luchters S. Effects of hazardous and harmful alcohol use on HIV incidence and sexual behaviour: a cohort study of Kenyan female sex workers. Glob Health. 2014;10:22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Chersich MF, Rees HV, Scorgie F, Martin G. Enhancing global control of alcohol to reduce unsafe sex and HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health. 2009;5:16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Vermaak R, Jooste S, Cain D. HIV/AIDS risks among men and women who drink at informal alcohol serving establishments (Shebeens) in Cape Town, South Africa. Prev Sci. 2008;9(1):55–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Cain D, Carey KB, Carey MP, Eaton L, Harel O, Mehlomakhulu V, Mwaba K. Randomized community-level HIV prevention intervention trial for men who drink in south African alcohol-serving venues. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(5):833–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Van der Straten A, King R, Grinstead O, Vittinghoff E, Serufilira A, Allen S. Sexual coercion, physical violence, and HIV infection among women in steady relationships in Kigali, Rwanda. AIDS Behavior. 1998;2(1):61–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Koenig MA, Lutalo T, Zhao F, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Wabwire-Mangen F, Kigozi G, Sewankambo N, Wagman J, Serwadda D, et al. Coercive sex in rural Uganda: prevalence and associated risk factors. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58(4):787–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Abbey A, Zawacki T, Buck PO, Testa M, Parks K, Norris J, Martin SE, Livingston JA, McAuslan P, Clinton AM, et al. How does alcohol contribute to sexual assault? Explanations from laboratory and survey data. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2002;26(4):575–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Celio MA, MacKillop J, Caswell AJ, Mastroleo NR, Kahler CW, Barnett NP, Colby SM, Operario D, Monti PM. Interactive relationships between sex-related Alcohol expectancies and delay discounting on risky sex. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016;40(3):638–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Dermen KH, Cooper ML, Agocha VB. Sex-related alcohol expectancies as moderators of the relationship between alcohol use and risky sex in adolescents. J Stud Alcohol. 1998;59(1):71–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Bryan A, Ray LA, Cooper ML. Alcohol use and protective sexual behaviors among high-risk adolescents. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(3):327–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Genberg BL, Kulich M, Kawichai S, Modiba P, Chingono A, Kilonzo GP, Richter L, Pettifor A, Sweat M, Celentano DD. HIV risk behaviors in sub-Saharan Africa and northern Thailand: baseline behavioral data from project accept. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(3):309–19.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Fisher JC, Cook PA, Kapiga SH. Alcohol use before sex and HIV risk: situational characteristics of protected and unprotected encounters among high-risk African women. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(9):571–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Woolf-King SE, Steinmaus CM, Reingold AL, Hahn JA. An update on alcohol use and risk of HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: meta-analysis and future research directions. Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2013;2(1):99–110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement