Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence, patterns of multimorbidity and associations with health care utilization among middle-aged and older people in China

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 537 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Multimorbidity has become one of the main challenges in health care system. The association between prevalence, patterns of multimorbidity and health care utilization is less often discussed in China. The purpose of this study is to examine this association among Chinese middle-aged and older adults and take into account different sociodemographic, behavioral and health characteristics. Based on this, implications of current evidence and effective intervention on multimorbidity and health care utilization can be identified and put into practice.

Methods

The wave 4 in 2018 of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) was used in the study. Multimorbidity was defined as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic medical condition of a list of fourteen chronic diseases in one person. The presence of chronic diseases was assessed through self-report. Health care utilization include whether the respondents received outpatient service last month and inpatient service in the past year. Latent Class Analysis was conducted to identify the clustering pattern of chronic diseases. Logistic regressions were employed to explore the association between prevalence, patterns of multimorbidity and health care utilization. Analyses were weighted using individual sample weights, adjusted for non-response of individual and household.

Results

Among 19,559 participants aged 45 and older, 23.10% were aged above 70 years and 52.42% were female. The prevalence of multimorbidity was 56.73%. Four patterns were identified: relatively healthy class, respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class. Multimorbid individuals used more outpatient services (OR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.65–2.17) and more inpatient services (OR = 2.52, 95%CI = 2.22–2.86) compared to their no-multimorbid counterparts. Compared to relatively healthy class, the respondents classified into respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class used more outpatient services (OR = 1.90, 95%CI = 1.57–2.30; OR = 2.39, 95%CI = 2.06–2.78; OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 1.32–1.79 respectively) and more inpatient services (OR = 2.19, 95%CI = 1.83–2.62; OR = 2.93, 95%CI = 2.53–3.40; OR = 1.90, 95%CI = 1.65–2.19 respectively).

Conclusion

Our study provided evidence that multimorbidity is high among Chinese older adults and is associated substantially higher health care utilization in China. Four multimorbidity patters were identified. Policy should prioritize improving the management of individuals with multimorbidity to increase healthcare efficiency. Further research is necessary with special emphasis on the trajectory of multimorbidity and the role of health system in satisfying needs of multimorbid individuals.

Peer Review reports

Background

Age-associated multiple chronic disease (multimorbidity) has been recognized as a critical public health issue around the world [1]. Multimorbidity poses a major challenge to health care symptoms, both in developing and developed countries [1, 2]. In geriatric individuals multimorbidity is associated with frailty, polypharmacy, health service misuse, with consequences of reduced quality of life, higher mortality and stress on health care systems [3,4,5,6,7]. Studies on multimorbidity are important for informing improvement of disease treatment, configuration of medical facilities and medical resource allocation [8].

Systematic reviews reported the prevalence of multimorbidity ranged from 3.5% (at age 75) to 100% (at age 85) around the world [1, 9]. The prevalence rises with increasing age and in the general population, an S-shape curve for prevalence by age was detected [10]. However, these results vary across studies due to the heterogeneity in the operational definition of multimorbidity, sample selection and methodology. Some articles examined prevalence for multimorbidity among Chinese adults, two of them were embedded in the same population-based study from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) [4, 11]. Yao [4] found multimorbidity occurred in 42.4% of participants aged at least 50 years and Chen [11] found the prevalence was 45.5% among urban residents. The prevalence among the whole sample and the association with health care utilization need further discussion.

A positive association between multimorbidity and health care utilization has been reported in some counties. Findings from Switzerland have showed that, the mean number of consultations was 15.7 among multimorbid individuals per year compared to 4.4 in the non-multimorbid sample [12]. Evidence from 16 European countries showed number of chronic diseases was associated with more hospital care utilization in both primary and secondary setting [13].

Previous literature has indicated that chronic conditions tend to cluster together into so-called multimorbidity patterns [14]. A study conducted in Brazil identified three patterns: cardiopulmonary pattern, musculoskeletal pattern and vascular-metabolic pattern among older adults [15]. Roselyne et al. found participants aged 60 years and older from the Swedish National Study and Care were grouped into six multimorbidity patterns: (i) psychiatric disorders (5.87%); (ii) cardiovascular diseases (6.27%); (iii) metabolic and sleep disorders (10.67%); (iv)sensory impairments and cancer (11.87%), (v) musculoskeletal, respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases (15.78%) and (vi) unspecific(49.56%) [14]. These findings may not be comparable due to differences in study population, analytical methods and eligible diseases. Recent studies have revealed the existence of multimorbidity patterns clustering systematically associated health problems that fall beyond the standard concept of medical specialties established by health systems. The disease cluster poses a challenge for the design of adequate prevention and treatment strategies [5].Some studies looked at multimorbidity patterns and hospital care utilization, but including only respondents aged 80 years or older, or already hospitalized patients [14, 16]. These associations were less discussed in China. Further research is needed in China.

The applicability of multimorbidity requires further knowledge of the prevalence, patterns, the chronic diseases that are involved, and the potential association with health care utilization. Research on prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity and the association with health care utilization is necessary among Chinese older adults, which can provide implications for clinical practice and health policy. The purpose of the present study is to assess multimorbidity and patterns of multimorbidity and explore the associations with health care utilization among middle-aged and older people in China. Based on this, implications of current evidence and effective intervention on multimorbidity and health care utilization can be identified and put into practice.

Methods

Data and sample

This study used data of wave 4 in 2018 of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). CHARLS is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of Chinese aged 45 and older. The CHARLS sample was obtained through stratified multistage probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling [17]. The CHARLS 2018 covered 150 counties/districts, 450 communities/villages, involving 19,816 individuals (overall response rate was 83.84%). The survey was conducted from June to August in 2018. Respondents who was under 45 years old and with missing values in chronic diseases and other important variables were exclude from analyses (n = 257). This study comprised 19,559 individuals aged 45 years old and above (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flowchart of the sample

Full size image

Ethics approval

The CHARLS was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015) and all participants sighed informed consent before interview [17].

Measures

Multimorbidity and multimorbidity patterns

Xu detected three major definitions of multimorbidity from three major perspectives: epidemiology and public health, clinicians and patients in daily clinical practice and long term care and family medicine in primary care [1]. The definition from WHO was the co-occurrence of two or more chronic medical condition in one person, which is simple and easy to implement. In this study, as most studies, multimorbidity was defined as the simultaneous presence of two or more chronic diseases/conditions [11]. In CHARLS, the respondents were asked whether they had been diagnosed by a doctor with fourteen chronic diseases including: hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, cancer, chronic lung diseases, liver diseases, heart diseases, stroke, kidney diseases, digestive diseases, emotional or psychiatric problems, memory-related disease, arthritis and asthma. If the respondents answered “yes”, they were regarded as have the chronic diseases and the number of chronic diseases were computed. Consistent with previous literature [18], all 14 chronic diseases were included in the assessment of multimorbidity. Respondents with cognitive impairments were included in the study, if he/she cannot answer the question, his or her spouse will answer instead.

Previous studies showed that chronic diseases tend to cluster together into so-called multimorbidity patterns [14, 19]. Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was conducted to identify the clustering pattern of fourteen chronic diseases among the respondents. Four patterns were named as: relatively healthy class, respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class (see Statistical Analysis section).

Health care utilization

Health care utilization include whether the respondents received outpatient service last month and inpatient service in the past year. If the respondents visited a public/private hospital, public health center, clinic, or health worker’s or doctor’s practice, or been visited by a doctor for outpatient care, the dummy variables of outpatient service utilization was coded as 1, otherwise as 0. Similarly, if the respondents received inpatient care in the past year, the dummy variable of inpatient service utilization was coded as 1, otherwise as 0.

Covariates

Guided by the literature [18, 20], covariates involved demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, health behavior, health status and functional state. Demographic characteristics consisted of age group (45–59, 60–69, ≧70), gender (male, female), marriage status (married, windowed, others). Socioeconomic variables consisted of education (Sishu/home school and below, elementary school, middle school, high school and above), residence (rural, urban) and health insurance (UEBMI, URBMI, NRCMS, others, no insurance). We didn’t conclude work status because informal employment is an universal phenomenon in China. Many respondents in rural areas engage in agriculture work till they are very old. So we didn’t conclude this variable in the analysis. Health behavior included alcohol consumption (never, occasionally, usually) and smoking status (never, quit, current) [20]. Health status were measured by self-rated health (less than good, good). Functional state was measured by whether respondents have difficulty in activities in daily life (ADL, yes or no).

Statistical analysis

LCA is a useful tool for determining subtypes or groups in multivariate categorical data. Two to six classes were examined and the best fitting solution was selected based on the evaluation of a variety of model fit statistics. The four-class model emerged as the best fitting one (see Supplementary Table 1 for the model-fit statistics) and had the most reasonable clinical results for interpretability. Four patterns were named as: relatively healthy class, respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class. Descriptive statistics were conducted to explore the difference between socioeconomic, health related variables and multimorbidity characteristics. Logistic regression model was conducted to explore the association between multimorbidity and health care utilization. All models were adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, residence, alcohol consumption, smoking, activities in daily life (ADL) and self-rated health (SRH). The analyses were weighted using individual sample weights, adjusted for non-response of individual and household. The level of significance was defined as 2-sided P value < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using Stata 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Characteristics of the respondents

A total of 19,559 respondents aged 45 years old and above were included in the study. The socio-economic characteristics, multimorbidity factors and health behavior of all participants are shown in Table 1. In the sample, the proportion of the female (52.42%) was greater than the male (47.58%). 84.97% were married and 12.84% were windowed. For education, 43.65% had Sishu/home school and below. 59.69% lived in rural area. 26.13% of the respondents usually drank and 40.01% were currently smokers. 18.48% of the respondents had difficulty in ADL and 77.03% rated their health as less than good (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic factors, health behavior and morbidity characteristics of all respondents (n = 19,559)
Full size table

Prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity

Of the weighted sample, the prevalence of multimorbidity was 56.73% for all respondents (Table 1). As mentioned above, all respondents were classified into one of the four classes. The relatively healthy class consists of respondents with a substantially lower prevalence of all chronic diseases, including 65.02% of the respondents. The respiratory class was composed of respondents with a higher prevalence of chronic lung disease and asthma. The stomach-arthritic class included respondents with a higher prevalence of stomach/digestive diseases and arthritis. The vascular class was composed of respondents with a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, heart disease and stroke (See Fig. 2). About 6.39%, 9.99% and 18.60% of the respondents were assigned to the respiratory class, stomach-arthritic class and vascular class, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Four-class model of multimorbidity patterns

Full size image

Multimorbidity and health care utilization

In this study, 73.1% of outpatient and 79.2% of inpatient service were consumed by multimorbid patients. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between multimorbidity and health care utilization. After controlling for Sociodemographic factors, health behavior and health status, multimorbid participants used more outpatient services (OR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.65–2.17) and more inpatient services (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 2.22–2.86) compared to the non-multimorbid participants. Older participants used more inpatient care (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.02) but less outpatient care (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99). Respondents who usually drank, rated their health as good used less health service. And those who had difficulty in ADL used more outpatient (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.24–1.60) and inpatient care service (OR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.61–2.06). Respondents with health insurance used more health service compared to those without health insurance (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between multimorbidity and health care utilization
Full size table

Another logistic regression was conducted to explore the association between multimorbidity pattern and health care utilization (Covariates include age, gender, marital status, education, residence, InPCE, alcohol consumption, smoking status, difficulty in ADL, self-rated health and health insurance were controlled). The relatively healthy class was employed as the reference group, giving that respondents belonging to this pattern had the lowest probabilities of chronic diseases. The respondents classified into three other patterns used more health service. Compared to relatively healthy class, the respondents classified into respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class used more outpatient service (OR = 1.90, 95%CI = 1.57–2.30; OR = 2.39, 95%CI = 2.06–2.78; OR = 1.53, 95%CI = 1.32–1.79 respectively) and more inpatient services (OR = 2.19, 95%CI = 1.83–2.62; OR = 2.93, 95%CI = 2.53–3.40; OR = 1.90, 95%CI = 1.65–2.19 respectively) ( see Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Weighted odds ratio of outpatient and inpatient service utilization by multimorbidity patterns

Full size image

Discussion

Based on a nationally representative data, the present study investigated the prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity and the association with health care utilization among Chinese middle-aged and older adults. The prevalence of self-reported multimorbidity was 56.73% among middle-aged and older Chinese. Multimorbid respondents used more outpatient and inpatient service. These results are similar to results observed elsewhere [21,22,23]. Four patterns of multimorbidity: relatively healthy class, respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class were identified. Respondents belonging to specific multimorbidity patterns used more health service than their relatively health counterparts.

A growing body of research have examined the prevalence of multimorbidity. The number of chronic conditions varied from two to many, with prevalence from 6.4 to 86.9% in China and from 9 to 83% in South Asia [4]. A study found that persons aged 50 and older among 16 European countries, the prevalence of multimorbidity was 37.3% [13]. These results vary widely, as the heterogeneity was large in terms of definition of multimorbidity, sample and data source among these studies [24]. Several studies also used data from CHARLS, for example, Chen found the prevalence of multimorbidity was 45.5% among Chinese urban residents [11]. Another study found multimorbidity occurred in 42.4% participants aged at least 50 years [4]. The prevalence of multimorbidity in our study was higher than these two studies. A possible explanation is that the follow-up sample of CHARLS became older and there is accumulation of chronic conditions during the aging process [25].

We observed the prevalence of multimorbidity increased with age substantially but slightly decreased among those oldest-old individuals. Possible explanations may be that, first, oldest-old individuals may be a selected sample with fewer chronic conditions. Second, oldest-old individuals may underreport chronic diseases because of recall bias [4]. Female are more vulnerable to multimorbidity compared to male. This gender difference can be explained that female are less likely to underreport their diseases and pay more attention to health status than male [4, 25].

According to the results, multimorbidity was markedly associated with a higher utilization of both outpatient and inpatient care. This result was in line with studies conducted in both developing and developed countries [11, 13, 23, 26, 27]. In a Dutch survey, the mean number of contacts in patients with multimorbidity was significantly higher than patients with one or none chronic diseases (18.3 vs. 11.7 and 6.1 contacts, respectively) [28]. In the Switzerland by Caroline [12], the mean number of consultations per year was 15.7 in the multimorbid compared to 4.4 in the non-multimorbid counterparts. WHO study on global aging and adult health (WHO-SAGE) conducted in India indicated that respondents with three and more chronic diseases were one and a half times more likely to have outpatient and inpatient visit [29]. Multimorbidity requires more diverse and intensive care, which likely explains more health care utilization among individuals with multimorbidity [30].

In the present study, we identified four multimorbidity patterns among middle-aged and older adults in China using LCA. More than 60% of the respondents were classified into the relatively health class, which coincided with previous studies using similar methods, with 60.4% in Korea [31] and 63.8% in Spain [32]. But our result was higher than Zhang et al., who found half of the respondents were classified into the relatively health class because of the older sample in their study. The vascular class was revealed in our study, which consisting of respondents with a high rate of cardiovascular diseases, similar to developed countries [14]. Our study also identified the stomach-arthritic class, similar to previous study [18]. The explanation might be that both digestive diseases and arthritic diseases were of high prevalence among Chinese adults. The other explanation may be that the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in arthritic patients may cause gastrointestinal ulcers [4].

Belonging to the stomach-arthritis class was strongly associated with higher health service utilization. The prevalence of stomach disease and arthritis is high in middle age and older population in China [33]. Previous study found individuals with arthritis had greater odds of having a hospitalization event and higher number of ambulatory care visits [34]. Another study also found older adults with arthritis were significantly more likely to have a physician visit, hospital admission, outpatient surgery and home health care [35]. The respiratory class also showed a relatively strong association with outpatient and inpatient service utilization. Diseases like lung disease and asthma, which comprise this pattern, are characterised by frequent exacerbations, are most likely responsible for the higher odds of health care utilization [14]. The vascular class showed a higher odds of health utilization. This pattern was characterised by a high prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, heart diseases, diabetes and stroke. This finding was consistent with an Italian study, which was conducted among adults aged 65 years and older, revealed that an increase risk of hospital admissions in adults with heart disease as well as with metabolic patterns [36]. Respondents within this pattern are prone to experience organ decompensations, which may explain higher utilization of health care. However, the associations were even weaker in our study, most likely due to the younger respondents in our study.

Having difficulty in ADL was associated with more health utilization. Which was consisted with previous evidence [37]. Having difficulty in ADL indicated poorer functional state of the respondents and health service consumption increased accordingly. What’s more, respondents had health insurance consumed more health service. Which can be explained by the fact that individuals with no health insurance had limited access to health resources and were liable to be under diagnosis of chronic diseases [38, 39]. Risk factors of multimorbidity and multimorbidity patterns identified in the present study may help develop and implement interventions to prevent more serious consequences of multimorbidity. More attention should be paid to those who were older, having difficulty in ADL and without health insurance.

In this respondents aged 45 years and older in China, 73.1% of outpatient and 79.2% of inpatient services were consumed by multimorbid patients, making this group an important consumer for health care providers. However, multimorbid groups receive little attention in current health service provision in recent China. With the expected rise in multimorbidity in the following decades, this requires more health resources. In case of under treatment for patients with multiple chronic diseases, health systems should be prepared for the future increase in health care utilization.

Strengths and limitations

A national representative sample of the Chinese middle-aged and older adults were used and the most commonly used definition of multimorbidity were followed in this study [40] to increase the compatibility with previous literature. Though there were some studies on multimorbidity among Chinese adults, these studies focused on the prevalence and patterns [4, 40] of multimorbidity, or only pay attention to urban adults [11].

Limitations of this study include the use of self-report chronic conditions instead of clinical diagnose by healthcare professionals. So the misclassification of diseases or under-diagnosis cannot be ruled out [41]. The CHARLS questionnaire did not ask about all chronic diseases typically included in clinical database studies [42]. Health care utilization was also based on self-report, and therefore may subject to recall bias. Second, a cross- sectional design was used, so the causal relationship between multimorbidity and health care utilization could not be established. But future research needs to investigate such causal relationships by longitudinal data of CHARLS.

Policy implications

Our findings provide further evidence for targeted interventions and policies to tackle the growing burden of multimorbidity in China. At present, clinical management is largely focused on single diseases, our study support that more focus should be placed on multimorbid individuals, as they need a coordinated, continuous and comprehensive medical care [13]. Owing to population aging and consequent rise in multimorbidity and health service utilization in the future, the management of comorbidities requires a multidisciplinary team to formulate a comprehensive and coordinated care, and through active preventive measures to improve the health of multimorbid patients. Chinese health system should prioritise improving the management of multimorbid patients to increase healthcare efficiency, and improve health outcomes.

Conclusion

Multimorbidity is highly prevalent among Chinese middle-aged and older adults and is associated with substantially higher health care utilization. Women, old age, having difficulty in ADL, having health insurance were predictors of multimorbidity. Four patterns of multimorbidity: relatively healthy class, respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class were identified. Compared to relatively healthy class, the respondents classified into respiratory class, stomach-arthritis class and vascular class used more inpatient and outpatient services. These results may provide insights that could help to manage multimorbidity patients and improve health resource allocation. Strategies to address the growing burden of multimorbidity in China should include effects to improve the management of multimorbid individuals to improve health outcomes associated with aging and reduce associated burden of them.

Data Availability

Please contact CHARLS (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study) for data requests. http://charls.pku.edu.cn/zh-CN.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities in Daily Life

CHARLS:

China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study

SRH:

Self-rated health

UEBMI:

Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance

URBMI:

Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance

NRCMS:

New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme

References

  1. Xu X, Mishra GD, Jones M. Evidence on multimorbidity from definition to intervention: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;37:53–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Report WH. The World Report on Ageing and Health[J]. Gerontologist. 2015;56(Suppl 2):163–S166.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh K, Patel SA, Biswas S, et al. Multimorbidity in south asian adults: prevalence, risk factors and mortality[J]. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019;41(1):80–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yao S, Cao G, Han L, et al. Prevalence and patterns of Multimorbidity in a nationally Representative Sample of older Chinese: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study[J]. Volume 75. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES; 2020. pp. 1974–80. 10.

  5. Abad-Diez JM, Calderon-Larranaga A, Poncel-Falco A, et al. Age and gender differences in the prevalence and patterns of multimorbidity in the older population[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Klompstra L, Ekdahl AW, Krevers B, et al. Factors related to health-related quality of life in older people with multimorbidity and high health care consumption over a two-year period[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):187.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Alaba O, Chola L. The social determinants of multimorbidity in South Africa[J]. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Prince MJP, Wu FM, Guo YM et al. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice[J]. The Lancet (British edition), 2015,385(9967):549–562.

  9. Pati S, Swain S, Hussain MA, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of multimorbidity in South Asia: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e7235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fortin MMM, C, Stewart MP, Poitras MRM, et al. A systematic review of Prevalence Studies on Multimorbidity: toward a more uniform Methodology[J]. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):142–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen H, Cheng M, Zhuang Y, et al. Multimorbidity among middle-aged and older persons in urban China: prevalence, characteristics and health service utilization[J]. Volume 18. GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL; 2018. pp. 1447–52. 10.

  12. Bähler C, Huber CA, Brüngger B, et al. Multimorbidity, health care utilization and costs in an elderly community-dwelling population: a claims data based observational study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Palladino R, Tayu LJ, Ashworth M, et al. Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 european countries[J]. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):431–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Akugizibwe R, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Roso-Llorach A, et al. Multimorbidity patterns and unplanned hospitalisation in a cohort of older Adults[J]. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Canever JB, de Souza MB, Danielewicz AL, et al. Are multimorbidity patterns associated with fear of falling in community-dwelling older adults?[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):192.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Teh RO, Menzies OH, Connolly MJ, et al. Patterns of multi-morbidity and prediction of hospitalisation and all-cause mortality in advanced age[J]. Age Ageing. 2018;47(2):261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao YJS, X, Gong QMGW. China Health and Retirement Longi- tudinal Study Wave 4 user’s Guide[J]. National School of Development, Peking University; 2020.

  18. Zhang Q, Han X, Zhao X, et al. Multimorbidity patterns and associated factors in older Chinese: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Garin N, Koyanagi A, Chatterji S, et al. Global multimorbidity patterns: a cross-sectional, Population-Based, Multi-Country Study[J]. The journals of gerontology. Ser Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(2):205–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lu J, Wang Y, Hou L, et al. Multimorbidity patterns in old adults and their associated multi-layered factors: a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):372.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori T, Hamada S, Yoshie S, et al. The associations of multimorbidity with the sum of annual medical and long-term care expenditures in Japan[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vermunt NPCA, Harmsen M, Westert GP, et al. Collaborative goal setting with elderly patients with chronic disease or multimorbidity: a systematic review[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zielinski A, Halling A. Association between age, gender and multimorbidity level and receiving home health care: a population-based swedish study[J]. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8(708):714.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu X, Huang J, Lv Y, et al. Status of prevalence study on multimorbidity of chronic disease in China: systematic review[J]. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015;15(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jankovic J, Mirkovic M, Jovic-Vranes A, et al. Association between non-communicable disease multimorbidity and health care utilization in a middle-income country: population-based study[J]. Public Health. 2018;155:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glynn LG, Valderas JM, Healy P, et al. The prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care and its effect on health care utilization and cost[J]. Fam Pract. 2011;28(5):516–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ha NT, Le NH, Khanal V, et al. Multimorbidity and its social determinants among older people in southern provinces, Vietnam[J]. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. van Oostrom SH, P H D B, Al E. Multimorbidity of chronic diseases and health care utilization in general practice. 2014;15:61[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2017,15(61).

  29. Pati S, Agrawal S, Swain S, et al. Non communicable disease multimorbidity and associated health care utilization and expenditures in India: cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. van Oostrom SH, Picavet HS, de Bruin SR, et al. Multimorbidity of chronic diseases and health care utilization in general practice[J]. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Park B, Lee HA, Park H. Use of latent class analysis to identify multimorbidity patterns and associated factors in korean adults aged 50 years and older[J]. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e216259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Olaya B, Moneta MV, Caballero FF, et al. Latent class analysis of multimorbidity patterns and associated outcomes in Spanish older adults: a prospective cohort study[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao P, Wu K, Qian J, et al. Prevalence and Associated factors of arthritis in Middle- and old-aged populations in China[J]. J Sichuan Univ Med Sci Ed. 2017;48(2):268–71.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Salkar M, Gangan NAYY. Association between work absence and Health Services utilization and costs among employed individuals with Arthritis[J]. Volume 62. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE; 2020. pp. E240–4. 6.

  35. Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, et al. Health care utilization among older adults with arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49(2):164–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Buja A, Rivera M, Ebell M. Multimorbidity and Hospital admissions in High-Need, high-cost Elderly Patients[J]. J Aging Health. 2020;32(5–6):259–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ahmadi B, Alimohammadian M, Yaseri M, et al. Multimorbidity: epidemiology and risk factors in the Golestan Cohort Study, Iran: a cross-sectional Analysis[J]. Med (Baltim). 2016;95(7):e2756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li C, Zhou R, Yao N, et al. Health Care utilization and unmet needs in chinese older adults with multimorbidity and functional Impairment[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(6):806–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sinha A, Kerketta S, Ghosal S, et al. Multimorbidity among Urban Poor in India: findings from LASI, Wave-1[J]. Front Public Health. 2022;10:881967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang HH, Wang JJ, Wong SY, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity in China and implications for the healthcare system: cross-sectional survey among 162,464 community household residents in southern China[J]. BMC Med. 2014;12:188.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong HJ, Wressle E, Marcusson J. Multimorbidity patterns of and use of health services by swedish 85-year-olds: an exploratory study[J]. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Guthrie B, Payne K, Alderson P, et al. Adapting clinical guidelines to take account of multimorbidity[J]. BMJ. 2012;345:e6341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the national development research institute at Peking University for providing us with the CHARLS data.

Funding

The research was support by grants from Humanities and Social Science Foundation of the Ministry of Education in China (NO 21YJA840018 and 18YJC840001). The granting agencies did not have roles in the design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yaqin Zhong and Gang Qin contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Nantong University, 9 Se-yuan Road, Nantong, Jiangsu, 210029, China

    Yaqin Zhong, Yanan Wang, Tiantian Wang & Yuexia Gao

  2. Clinical Trial Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, 20 Xi-Si Road, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226001, China

    Gang Qin

  3. School of Medicine, Nantong University, 9 Qixiu Road, Nantong, Jiangsu, 226019, China

    Hanqing Xi

  4. School of Nursing, Jiujiang University, 551 Qianjin Dong Road, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, 332005, China

    Duanying Cai

Authors
  1. Yaqin Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gang Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanqing Xi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Duanying Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tiantian Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuexia Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YZ carried out the study, and holds the main responsibility for writing the manuscript. GQ and YG revised the manuscript.TW and YW conducted the statistical analysis. HX and DC drafted parts of the paper and revised the manuscript. YZ and GQ contributed equally to this work. All authors provided input during the preparation of the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuexia Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for CHARLS was granted from the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015). All participants sighed informed consent before interview. The study methodology was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, Y., Qin, G., Xi, H. et al. Prevalence, patterns of multimorbidity and associations with health care utilization among middle-aged and older people in China. BMC Public Health 23, 537 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15412-5

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us