Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and determinants of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: cross-sectional analyses of demographic and health survey data

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 647 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Maternal health constitutes high priority agenda for governments across the world. Despite efforts by various governments in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the sub-region still records very high maternal mortality cases. Meanwhile, adequate utilization of maternal healthcare (antenatal care [ANC], skilled birth attendance [SBA], and Postnatal care [PNC]) plays a vital role in achieving improved maternal health outcomes. We examined the prevalence and determinants of maternal healthcare utilization among young women in 28 sub-Saharan African countries using data from demographic and health surveys.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of 43,786 young women aged 15–24 years from the most recent demographic and health surveys of 28 sub-Saharan African countries. We adopted a multilevel logistic regression analysis in examining the determinats of ANC, SBA, and PNC respectively. The results are presented as adjusted Odds Ratios (aOR) for the logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA was 55.2%, 78.8%, and 40% for ANC, SBA, and PNC respectively with inter-country variations. The probability of utilising maternal healthcare increased with wealth status. Young women who were in the richest wealth quintile were, for instance, 2.03, 5.80, and 1.24 times respectively more likely to utilise ANC (95% CI = 1.80–2.29), SBA (95% CI = 4.67–7.20), and PNC (95% CI = 1.08–1.43) than young women in the poorest wealth quintile. Young women who indicated having a barrier to healthcare utilisation were, however, less likely to utilise maternal healthcare (ANC: aOR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.78–0.88; SBA: aOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.75–0.88; PNC: aOR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.83–0.94).

Conclusion

While SBA utilisation was high, we found ANC and PNC utilisation to be quite low among young women in SSA with inter-country variations. To accelerate progress towards the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) targets on reducing maternal mortality and achieving universal health coverage, our study recommends the adoption of interventions which have proven effective in some countries, by countries which recorded low maternal healthcare utilisation. The interventions include the implementation of free delivery services, training and integration of TBAs into orthodox maternal healthcare, improved accessibility of facilities, and consistent public health education. These interventions could particularly focus on young women in the lowest wealth quintile, those who experience barriers to maternal healthcare utilisation, uneducated women, and young women from rural areas.

Peer Review reports

Background

Maternal health constitutes high priority agenda for governments across the world. It is an important component of the global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) set in 2015 by the United Nations [1,2,3] SDG targets 3.1 and 3.8, for instance, seek to reduce the maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, and achieve universal health coverage respectively. Despite efforts by various governments in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), the sub-region still records very high maternal mortality cases. A World Health Organisation (WHO) report [2], for instance, reported that more than 800 maternal mortality cases occur each day in SSA due to pregnancy-related and childbirth-related complications.

Adequate utilisation of maternal healthcare which constitutes Antenatal care (ANC), Skilled Birth Attendance (SBA), and postnatal care (PNC), which are proven services that play a vital role in achieving improved maternal health outcomes [4], has been recognised as the panacea in mitigating the menace of maternal mortality in SSA [5,6,7,8]. For instance, timely and appropriate antenatal utilisation alone can reduce maternal mortality by 20% [9]. Similarly, PNC utilisation within 24 h after birth as recommended by WHO is crucial for averting maternal deaths [10]. PNC stage mornally commence immediately after childbirth until 42 days after birth [11]. According to recommendation by WHO women should receive at least three postnatal care visits in addition to the first visit which is expected to take place within 24 h after birth [12].

Despite the importance of maternal healthcare utilisation in promoting maternal health, coverage in SSA is still quite low. For instance, irrespective of its cruicial role in the reducing maternal mortality, large number of women continue to give birth without professional assistance in some SSA countries, especially during their subsequent deliveries. In Ethiopia for instance, approximately 70.8% of women gave birth without any assistance of SBA at home during the last child birth [13].

Studies conducted at individual country levels have revealed that socio-economic status, availability and accessibility to health facility, knowledge on pregnancy emergencies, and educational level of mothers influence the maternal service utilisation in SSA [14,15,16].

Several interventions have been implemented by SSA countries to improve the maternal health service utilisation [17,18,19,20]. Ghana for example introduced one most important health financing reform in the history of the country, free maternal healthcare policy (FMHCP) in 2008 as part of the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to removing financial barriers and resultant inequalities in maternal healthcare utilisation among pregnant and nursing mothers [17, 21, 22]. This policy has increased access and utilisation among mothers [14]. According to Novignon, Ofori, Tabiri, and Pulok [17], with the implementation of the policy, ANC has increased from 70.6% in 2003 to 86.5% in 2014. Similarly, skilled birth attendance increased from 43.9% in 2003 to 72.8% in 2014 [17].

The majority of studies carried out in SSA on maternal healthcare utilisation have not combined all the three components (ANC, PNC and skilled delivery). The combination of the three services in this study provides an opportunity to make direct comparison among the maternal services and also determine how these services influences each other when combined. The studies have also focused on individual country levels. To bridge this existing gap, we analysed ANC, SBA, and PNC using the nationality representative demographic and health survey (DHS) data on young women using data from 28 countries in SSA. This study focused on young women aged 15–24 because they have the highest risks of developing obstetric complications such as sepsis, postpartum haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and associated mortalities [23, 24]. Understanding the maternal healthcare utilisation patterns in this priority age bracket is relevant in providing targeted healthcare interventions. The study also adopted multivariable logistic regression to achieve a robust analysis of the various determinants (individual and contextual) influencing maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA. The findings could inform the formulation and implementation of interventions focused on maternal healthcare utilisation in the sub-region.

Materials and methods

Data source and study design

This study involved a cross-sectional analysis of data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of twenty-eight (28) countries in SSA. Data for the study were pooled from the most recent surveys in those countries, specifically the women’s file. DHS is a nationally representative survey usually conducted every 5 years in over 85 low- and middle-income countries [25]. The DHS uses a structured questionnaire to collect data from the respondents on health indicators such as maternal and child health [25]. The survey employed a two-stage sampling method to collect data from the respondents. A detailed explanation of the sampling process and data collection methodology has been published elsewhere [26]. A total of 43,786 young women aged 15–24 years with complete cases of variables of interest were included in the final analysis. The sample size per country can be found in Appendix 1. We relied on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement in writing the manuscript [27] (See Appendix 2).

Study variables

Outcome variable

The outcome variable in the present study was maternal healthcare service utilisation. This variable has three main components consisting of ANC, SBA, and PNC. Regarding the utilisation of ANC, the women were asked about the number of antenatal visits they made during their recent pregnancy. The responses were recoded as 0–3 = 0 “No" and 4 and above = 1 “Yes”. With SBA, the women were asked “Who assisted [NAME] during delivery?”. The response to this question was categorised into “Traditional Birth Attendant/Others” = 0 and “SBA/Health professionals” = 1. Also, PNC attendance was derived from the question, “Did [NAME] go for PNC checks within 2 months?”. The response options were “Yes”, “No” and “Don’t know”. This was recoded into “No” = 0 and “Yes” = 1. The categorizations and recodings used in the present study were informed by literature [28,29,30].

Explanatory variables

A total of 16 explanatory variables were included in the study. These variables were selected because of their association with the outcome variables from previous studies [28, 29, 31,32,33] as wells as their availability in the DHS dataset. The variables were further grouped in to individual level and household/community (contextual) level. The individual level variables included age of the women and the partner or husband (years), education level of the respondent and the husband, marital status, religion, current working status, parity, exposure to mass media, health insurance ownership, person who usually decides on respondents healthcare, person who usually decides on large household purchases, and person who usually decides on visit to family or relatives. The survey years of the datasets used were controlled for as individual level variables. The household/community level variables consisted of wealth index, sex of household head, place of residence, and geographic subregions. For the individual level variables, maternal age was recoded as “15–19” and “20–24” years respectively. Marital status was recoded as “married” and “cohabiting”. Both the maternal and partner educational levels maintained the existing coding in the DHS dataset which was “no education”, “primary”, “secondary”, and “higher”. Religion was recoded as “Christianity”, “Islamic”, “African Traditional”, “no religion, and “others”. Partner age was recoded as “15–24”, “25–34”, “35–44”, and “45 and above”. Maternal working status was recoded as “not working” and “working”. Parity was recoded as “1”, “2”, “3”, and “4 or more”. We maintained the already existing coding for national health insurance (“No” and “yes’) as found in the DHS dataset. Exposure to media was created from three (3) variables (frequency of watching television, frequency of reading newspaper/magazine, and frequency of listening to the radio). All three variables had the same response options (not at all, less than once a week, at least once a week, and almost every day). The women who responded not at all were categorised as “Not exposed to mass media [No]” whilst those whose responses were less than once a week, at least once a week, and almost everyday were grouped as “exposed to mass media [Yes]”. An index variable called mass media exposure was created using the recoded responses from the three variables. Any woman with at least exposure from one of the variables was set to have exposure to mass media. The barrier to healthcare was created from three questions which consisted of difficulty in obtaining money (money), distance to health facility (distance), getting permission for treatment (permission). Any woman with at least “Yes” in any of the three was categorised as having a barrier to healthcare. Person who usually decides on respondents healthcare, person who usually decides on large household purchases, and person who usually decides on visit to family or relatives were coded as (“respondent alone”, “respondent and husband/partner”, “partner alone”, and “someone else or other”) respectively. For the household/community level variables, wealth index (“poorest”, “poorer”, “middle”, “richer”, and “richest”), sex of household head (“male” and “female”), and place of residence (“urban” and “rural”) as coded in the DHS dataset were maintained and used in the final analysis. Geographical subregion was coded as (“Southern”, “Central”, “Eastern”, and “Western”).

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were carried out using Stata version 16.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). The analyses were performed at three levels. First, forest plot was used to summarise the prevalence of ANC, SBA, and PNC (Fig. 1–3). Next, the Pearson chi-square test was performed to examine the relationship between explanatory variables and ANC, SBA, and PNC (See Table 2). Finally, a multilevel binary logistic regrerssion was used to examine the determinants of ANC, SBA, and PNC (Table 2–4). Four models (Model I-IV) were built to examine the determinants. Model O showed the variance in ANC, SBA, and PNC attributed to the clustering of the primary sampling units (PSUs). Model I was fitted to contain the individual-level variables. Model II contained the household/community-level variables. Model III was finally fitted to contain all the individual and household/community level variables. We employed the Stata command “melogit” in fitting the four models. Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) tests was used to test for model comparison and fittness. The model with the least AIC was selected as the best fitted model. The results of the regression analyses were presented using adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. A multicollinearity test was conducted using the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) and we found that the minimum, maximum, and mean VIF were 1.00, 3.74, and 1.74 respectively. Hence, there was no evidence of high collinearity among the studied variables. The women’s sample weights (v005/1,000,000) were applied to obtain unbiased estimates, according to the DHS guidelines and the survey command 'SVY' in Stata was used to adjust for the complex sampling structure of the data in all the analyses.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence of ANC among the young women in SSA

Full size image

Ethical considerations

Ethical permission was not sought for the present study since the DHS datasets used are publicly available. However, the DHS reports that ethical clearances were obtained from the Ethics Committee of ORC Macro Inc. as well as Ethics Boards of partner organisations of the various countries such as the Ministries of Health. The DHS follows the standards for ensuring the protection of respondents’ privacy. ICF International ensures that the survey complies with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ regulations for the respect of human subjects. Further information about the DHS data usage and ethical standards are available at http://goo.gl/ny8T6X

Results

Prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation

Figures 1, 2, and 3 (ANC, SBA, and PNC respectively) present the prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA. The highest prevalence of ANC, SBA, and PNC utilization was recorded in Sierra Leone (90.3%), Congo (97.5%), and Zimbabwe (88.4%) respectively. The lowest prevalence of ANC, SBA, and PNC utilisation were, however, respectively recorded in Ethiopia (30.1%), Gambia (32.3%), and Ethiopia (8.4%). Overall, the prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation in SSA was 55.2%, 78.8%, and 40% for ANC, SBA, and PNC respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of SBA among the young women in SSA

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Prevalence of PNC among the young women in SSA

Full size image

Table 1 presents bivariable results on the predictors of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA. We found statistically significant relationships between maternal healthcare utilisation and maternal educational level, marital status, partner educational level, religion, parity, ownership of health insurance, mass media exposure, decision-making capacity, barrier to healthcare, wealth index, sex of household head, and residence. Maternal age was significantly related to ANC and PNC utilisation, partner’s age was significantly related to ANC and SBA utilization, and maternal current working status was only significantly related to SBA utilisation.

Table 1 Bivariable analysis of predictors of ANC, SBA, and PNC among young women in SSA
Full size table

Determinants of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA

Tables 2, 3, and 4 present multivariable logistic regression analyses on the determinants of maternal healthcare utilization among young women in SSA for ANC, SBC, and PNC respectively. We found that young women in their early 20 s had higher odds of utilizing ANC (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11–1.28), SBA (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.06–1.25) and PNC (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11–1.28) than those in their late teens. Formal education was an important determinant of maternal healthcare utilization among young women in SSA. The probability of utilizing ANC and SBA among the young mothers increased with increasing level of maternal and partner’s education. Those with some formal education and whose partners also had some formal education were also all respectively more likely to utilise PNC than those with no formal education. Respondents who were unmarried also had lower odds of utilizing ANC, SBA, and PNC than those who were married.

Table 2 Mixed effect analysis of determinants of ANC among young women in sub-Saharan Africa
Full size table
Table 3 Mixed effect analysis of determinants of SBA among young women in sub-Saharan Africa
Full size table
Table 4 Mixed effect analysis of determinants of PNC among young women in sub-Saharan Africa
Full size table

We found that multiparous young women had lower odds to utilise maternal healthcare than those who were primiparous. Young women who had health insurance were more likely to utilise ANC (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.25–1.73) and PNC (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.17–1.69) than those without health insurance. Respondents who were exposed to the mass media were also more likely to utilise ANC (aOR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.21–1.36) and PNC (aOR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.32–1.50) than those not exposed. Young women who indicated having a barrier to healthcare utilization, were actually less likely to utilise maternal healthcare (ANC: aOR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.77–0.87; SBA: aOR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.75–0.88; PNC: aOR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.81–0.92). Young women who were in the richest wealth quintile were 1.64, 4.88, and 1.09 times respectively more likely to utilise ANC (95% CI = 1.45–1.86), SBA (95% CI = 3.93–6.07), and PNC (95% CI = 0.96–1.25) than young women in the poorest wealth quintile. In households where the head is a female, we found that women had higher odds of utilizing maternal healthcare than male-headed households. Rural dwellers were, however, less likely to utilise ANC and SBA than urban dwellers. The highest probabilities of ANC, SBA, and PNC utilization were respectively found in Sierra Leaone, Congo, and Zimbabwe.

Discussion

Our study examined maternal healthcare utilisation and its determinants among young women in 28 SSA countries. We found that overall, the prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation in SSA was 55.2%, 78.8%, and 40% for ANC, SBA, and PNC respectively. The findings revealed country-specific variations in the prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women with the highest prevalence and probabilities of ANC, SBA, and PNC being recorded in Sierra Leone, Congo, and Zimbabwe respectively.

The highest prevalence and probabilities of the respective components of maternal healthcare utilisation reported among young women in Sierra Leone, Congo, and Zimbabwe could be attributed to the various successful maternal health interventions that have been implemented in these countries to promote maternal healthcare among women overall, while reducing maternal and neonatal mortality ratios. For instance, Zimbabwe developed a National Maternal and Neonatal Health Road Map of 2007 which was launched in 2009. The intervention, which was highly successful, involved prioritising and scale up of evidence-based, up-to-date and cost-effective strategies and activities including the mobilisation of sufficient human, community health services, regular in-service training for health workers, and financial resources for maternal and neonatal healthcare [29]. Similarly, the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH) in Congo (DRC) implemented several maternal and child health interventions including the community-based maternal and child health project which focused on ensuring 4 + antenatal care among women ensuring successful skilled delivery through consistent health education and transportation systems for referrals [34, 35]. In 2010, the government of Sierra Leone through the Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MOHS) also implemented the Free Health Care Initiative (FHCI) which successfully provides comprehensive and free essential maternal health services, including antenatal, delivery, and PNC to women [36, 37].

Ideally, it is expected that women will attend ANC, give birth with skilled attendance, and then receive adequate PNC within 42 days after delivery [35, 38,39,40]. The high prevalence of SBA compared to the low ANC and PNC recorded in our study could be attributed to the recent concentration of national interventions in SSA on SBA at the expense of ANC and PNC [41,42,43,44,45,46]. For instance, the implementation of free delivery services, training and integration of Traditional Birth Attendants (TBA) into the orthodox maternal care, improved accessibility of facilities, establishment of community-based health planning and services (CHPS) to facilitate supervised and emergency skill delivery at the community level are interventions that have been vigorously implemented to improve SBA [41,42,43,44,45,46]. On the contrary, previous studies showing an almost universal ANC coverage in SSA [47,48,49] have probably led to reductions in the attention of health systems on this important component of maternal healthcare. Moreover, in SSA, especially in rural areas, mother in-laws as well as multigravida women have presumptions of knowing about the stages of pregnancy and overall ANC care, hence, they may neglect ANC attendance [43, 50,51,52].

The low prevalence of ANC and PNC utilisation recorded in our study is worrying as this militates against the achievement of SDG 3.1, and 3.8 targets of reducing the maternal mortality ratio to less than 70 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, and achieving universal health coverage respectively in SSA [3, 48]. The very low maternal healthcare utilisation recorded in the majority of the countries we studied and especially in Ethiopia, Gambia, and Ethiopia could be ascribed to the myriad of institutional and contextual factors bedeviling the healthcare systems and the provision of maternal healthcare in the respective countries. For instance, lack of partner support, perceived unimportance of maternal healthcare, lack of trust in health facilities/perceived poor services provided, lack of accessibility and affordability of the services could explain the low prevalence of maternal healthcare utilisation recorded [53,54,55,56]. Others include negative attitude of some healthcare workers, lack of health decision making power by women, confidence in TBAs, perception of seeking maternal healthcare as unnecessary by mother-in-laws, and limited access to and utilisation of healthcare [52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].

In this study, we found that young women who have some level of formal education were more likely to utilise maternal healthcare, especially ANC and PNC. This finding reveals the crucial role formal education in informing the health decisions of women. Similarly, we noted that women whose partners are formally educated had higher probabilities of utilising maternal healthcare. The observations made in this study corroborate previous studies which posited that maternal and partner’s formal education significantly increased the odds of women utilising prenatal care, hospital-based delivery, and PNC [60,61,62]. This observation could be attributed to the fact that pregnant women who are educated are more informed about the possible complications that can result from not seeking care before, during, and after delivery. Also, the finding where partner’s education increased maternal health service utilisation could be explained by the fact that educated partners know the importance of maternal health-seeking, and hence support their spouses to utilise maternal health service before, during, and after delivery. The perceived susceptibility to maternal complications and even death among educated mothers stimulates their willingness and confidence to seek professional care. This implies that efforts to improve maternal healthcare utilisation among women in SSA must adopt equal strategies that promote more health education on the benefits of seeking care or the consequences of not utilising maternal health among both women and partners especially among women and their partners who did not receive any formal education.

We found that multiparous women had lower odds to utilise maternal healthcare than those who were primiparous. This observation is in accordance with previous studies which found an inverse relationship between parity and healthcare utilisation among women [60, 63]. A study by Larsen, Exavery, Phillips, Tani, and Kanté [64], for instance, found that multiparous women were 84% less likely to utilise maternal health services than primiparous ones. This variation in the maternal healthcare utilisation between primiparous and multiparous women could be due to the fact that primiparous young women are at the highest risks of complications during pregnancy and delivery and for that matter end up utilising maternal healthcare more than multiparous women [65,66,67]. Besides, the observation of lower service utilisation among multiparous women could be due to the undesirable experiences including poor attitude of health professionals, long waiting time, high cost of service the multiparous might have experienced during their previous pregnancies or deliveries hence they probably become disgruntled with orthodox healthcare as found in previous studies [68,69,70,71].

Ownership of health insurance by young women increased the odds of PNC utilisation in our study. This finding is congruent to the findings from previous studies that health insurance improves healthcare utilisation as it provides financial risk protection to the women hence encourage them to seek postnatal orthodox health services [72,73,74,75,76]. This finding could be attributable to the financial protection offered by the possession of active health insurance, as previous studies have shown that out of pocket payments for maternal healthcare limit maternal health service utilisation among women [41, 77,78,79].

We also found that women who indicated having a barrier to healthcare utilisation could have lower odds of utilising maternal healthcare. Previous research has suggested that cultural and religious beliefs, family pressure, superstition, shyness, misconception, transportation, lack of family support, lack of autonomy, lack of access to maternal healthcare, poor quality of care, and religious beliefs serve as barriers to the utilisation of maternal healthcare services among women [80,81,82,83,84]. A study by Kea, Tulloch, Datiko, Theobald, and Kok [53] showed that traditions and beliefs including a tradition of hiding pregnancy at an early stage prevent women from seeking ANC. Also, the belief that a normal pregnancy with no seen complications needs no medical attention also prevents young women from seeking care [85, 86]. Out-of-pocket payments for maternal healthcare utilisation, especially among women without health insurance prevent many women in SSA from accessing maternal healthcare [87,88,89]. Furthermore, lack of transportation or financial power to afford transportation to the health facilities serves as a major barrier that hinders women’s service utilisation [90, 91].

In this study, we identified household wealth as an important determinant that could influence maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in SSA. We found in both our bivariable and multivariable analyses that the proportion and probability of utilising maternal healthcare increased with increasing wealth status among young women. This finding is parallel with the findings by previous studies [41, 65, 67, 92, 93]. A study by Yaya [77], for instance, demonstrated that maternal healthcare utilisation of ANC, SBA and PNC is positively and significantly linked to the wealth index of a household. The variation in maternal healthcare utilisation based on wealth status could be due to the fact that women from poor households are unable to afford the financial means to pay for transportation, for health cost at the facility, or even subscribe to health insurance, and hence are unable to utilise maternal healthcare [93,94,95].

We also found that in households where the head is a female, the odds of utilising maternal healthcare by young women were higher compared with male-headed households. This observation is congruent to postulations by previous studies [72, 96,97,98] and could be attributed to the fact that when women are at helm of the household, they have higher autonomy and decision-making power to make informed decision regarding the utilisation of maternal healthcare [96, 99, 100]. Also, women being heads of the household implies they have control over the household finances and have the purchasing power to utilise maternal services. Furthermore, it improves the support women receive or give to fellow women regarding maternal healthcare utilisation. This is because, like women themselves, they know and value the essence of effectively utilising maternal healthcare to protect their own lives and those of their babies [96, 101].

Place of residence was an important determinant of maternal healthcare utilisation in our study. Specifically, rural dwellers were less likely to utilise adequate ANC and SBA than urban dwellers. These findings are consistent with the findings of previous studies [29, 102,103,104,105,106] and could be explained by the fact that women residing in urban settings usually experience a multiplicity of health facilities [107,108,109,110,111] and, therefore, have easy access to healthcare due proximity of the health facilities, good nature of roads, and the availability of health professionals to attend to them in terms of ANC and SBA utilisation. Tanou and Kamiya [102] also posited that the non-availability of health facilities in rural areas and geographical inaccessibility of health facilities from rural settings are compounded by the poor nature of roads linking them to the facilities and thus constitute a major obstacle militating against maternal healthcare utilisation in SSA.

Our study had several limitations. First, as a cross-sectional study, we were unable to establish causal relationships between maternal healthcare utilisation and the explanatory variables. Also, because the responses by study participants were self-reported in the surveys, there is the possibility of social desirability bias on the part of the participants. Furthermore, the use of data from different time period could have affected the comparability of the results, however, these studies were the most recent of these countries.

Notwithstanding the limitations, a key strength of the study is that we used nationally representative data from the various SSA countries for our analyses. Also, our study is the first multi-country attempt using the nationally representative DHS data to simulatanuously examine the prevalence and determinants of the three main maternal health services (ANC, SBA and PNC) utilisation in SSA.

Conclusion

While the utilisation of SBA was high, we found ANC and PNC utilisation among young women to be low in SSA. To accelerate progress towards attainment of the SDG targets related to reducing maternal mortality and achieving universal health coverage in SSA, our study recommends the adoption of interventions which have proven effective in some countries, by countries which recorded low maternal healthcare utilisation. The interventions include the implementation of free delivery services, improved accessibility of facilities, establishment of CHPS to facilitate supervised and emergency skill delivery at the community level, regular in-service training for health workers, and consistent public health education. These interventions could particularly focus on young women in the lowest wealth quintile, women who experience barriers to maternal healthcare utilisation, uneducated women, and young women from rural areas.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the DHS Program repository at https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm

References

  1. McGowan K. World Health Day 2018: Maternal health care and universal health coverage. Maternal Health Task Force. 2018. Retrieved from https://www.mhtf.org/2018/04/05/world-health-day-2018-maternal-health-care-and-universal-health-coverage/ on 9 April 2021

  2. World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990–2015: estimates from WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA. World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: World Health Organization; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silver KL, Singer PA. SDGs: start with maternal, newborn, and child health cluster. Lancet. 2014;384(9948):1093–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abor PA, Abekah‐Nkrumah G, Sakyi K, Adjasi CK, Abor J. The socio‐economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Ghana. Int J Soc Econ. 2011;38(7):628-48.

  5. Haruna U, Dandeebo G, Galaa SZ. Improving access and utilization of maternal healthcare services through focused antenatal care in rural Ghana: a qualitative study. Advances in Public Health. 2019;31:2019.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Soubeiga D, Sia D, Gauvin L. Increasing institutional deliveries among antenatal clients: effect of birth preparedness counselling. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(8):1061–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell OM, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Strategies for reducing maternal mortality: getting on with what works. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1284–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pallikadavath S, Foss M, Stones RW. Antenatal care: provision and inequality in rural north India. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59(6):1147–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO, Unicef, UNFPA, The World Bank estimates. The World Bank. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2010. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. WHO technical consultation on postpartum and postnatal care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.

  12. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn. World Health Organization; 2014.

  13. Ayele GS, Melku AT, Belda SS. Utilization of skilled birth attendant at birth and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last 24 months preceding the survey in Gura Dhamole Woreda, Bale zone, southeast Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao P, Han X, You L, Zhao Y, Yang L, Liu Y. Maternal health services utilization and maternal mortality in China: a longitudinal study from 2009 to 2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020

  15. Hailu M, Gebremariam A, Alemseged F, Deribe K. Birth preparedness and complication readiness among pregnant women in Southern Ethiopia. PloS One. 2011;6(6):e21432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Aiga H, Nguyen VD, Nguyen CD, Nguyen TT, Nguyen LT. Knowledge, attitude and practices: assessing maternal and child health care handbook intervention in Vietnam. BMC Public Health. 2015;16(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Novignon J, Ofori B, Tabiri KG, Pulok MH. Socioeconomic inequalities in maternal health care utilization in Ghana. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18(1):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. FMoH E. Health Sector Transformation Plan. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: FM9F; 2015. 184.

  19. Nations United. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  20. FMOH. Health Sector Development Programme IV (HSDP) 2010/11–2014/15. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: FMOH; 2010. FINAL DRAFT, Version 19 March.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Azaare J, Akweongo P, Aryeetey GC, Dwomoh D. Impact of free maternal health care policy on maternal health care utilization and perinatal mortality in Ghana: protocol design for historical cohort study. Reprod Health. 2020;17(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Blanchet NJ, Fink G, Osei-Akoto I. The effect of Ghana’s national health insurance scheme on health care utilisation. Ghana Med J. 2012;46(2):76–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lammers C. Maternal-perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with adolescent pregnancy in Latin America: cross-sectional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(2):342–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vogel JP, Souza JP, Mori R, Morisaki N, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Ortiz‐Panozo E, Hernandez B, Pérez‐Cuevas R, Roy M, Mittal S. Maternal complications and perinatal mortality: findings of the World Health Organization multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. BJOG 2014;121:76–88.

  25. Corsi DJ, Neuman M, Finlay JE, Subramanian S. Demographic and health surveys: a profile. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1602–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aliaga A, Ruilin R. Cluster optimal sample size for demographic and health surveys. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics–ICOTS. 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative S. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Agbaglo E, Adu C, Budu E, Hagan JE, Yaya S. Determinants of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance services utilization among childbearing women in Guinea: evidence from the 2018 Guinea demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yaya S, Zegeye B, Ahinkorah BO, Seidu AA, Ameyaw EK, Adjei NK, Shibre G. Predictors of skilled birth attendance among married women in Cameroon: further analysis of 2018 Cameroon demographic and health survey. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rai RK, Singh PK, Singh L. Utilization of maternal health care services among married adolescent women: insights from the Nigeria demographic and health survey, 2008. Womens Health Issues. 2012;22(4):e407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Singh P, Singh KK, Singh P. Maternal health care service utilization among young married women in India, 1992–2016: trends and determinants. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tiruneh FN, Chuang KY, Chuang YC. Women’s autonomy and maternal healthcare service utilization in Ethiopia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tarekegn SM, Lieberman LS, Giedraitis V. Determinants of maternal health service utilization in Ethiopia: analysis of the 2011 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee H, Park SJ, Ndombi GO, Nam EW. The impact of the interventions for 4+ antenatal care service utilization in the democratic republic of congo: a decision tree analysis. Ann Glob Health. 2019;85(1):148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. World Health Organization. WHO recommended interventions for improving maternal and newborn health. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Koroma MM, Kamara SS, Bangura EA, Kamara MA, Lokossou V, Keita N. The quality of free antenatal and delivery services in Northern Sierra Leone. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Vallières F, Cassidy EL, McAuliffe E, Gilmore B, Bangura AS, Musa J. Can Sierra Leone maintain the equitable delivery of their free health care initiative? The case for more contextualised interventions: results of a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. An ML, Malonga F, Dramaix-Wilmet M, Donnen P. Determinants of maternal health services utilization in urban settings of the Democratic Republic of Congo–a case study of Lubumbashi City. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12(1):1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  39. de Masi S, Bucagu M, Tunçalp Ö, Peña-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Oladapo OT, Gülmezoglu M. Integrated person-centered health care for all women during pregnancy: implementing world health organization recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Global Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(2):197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tunçalp Ӧ, Pena-Rosas JP, Lawrie T, Bucagu M, Oladapo OT, Portela A, Metin Gülmezoglu A. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience—going beyond survival. BJOG. 2017;124(6):860–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Amu H, Sekyi DK. Effects of spatial location and household wealth on the utilisation of skilled birth attendants at delivery among women in Rural Ghana. Ghana J Geogr. 2018;10(1):58–77.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Apanga PA, Awoonor-Williams JK. Improving skilled birth attendance in Ghana: an evidence-based policy brief. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(3):1056–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ganle JK, Parker M, Fitpatrick R, Otupiri E. Free maternity care and equity of access to maternal health services in Ghana: a descriptive study. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Saleh K. The health sector in Ghana: a comprehensive assessment. Washington: World Bank; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Witter S, Arhinful DK, Kusi A, Zakariah-Akoto S. The experience of Ghana in implementing a user fee exemption policy to provide free delivery care. Reprod Health Matters. 2007;15(30):61–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hill Z, Amare Y, Scheelbeek P, Schellenberg J. ‘People have started to deliver in the facility these days’: a qualitative exploration of factors affecting facility delivery in Ethiopia. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e025516.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tessema ZT, Teshale AB, Tesema GA, Tamirat KS. Determinants of completing recommended antenatal care utilization in sub-Saharan from 2006 to 2018: evidence from 36 countries using demographic and health surveys. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. United Nations Statistics Division, Development Data and Outreach. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. 2021. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/goal-03/.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lincetto O, Mothebesoane-Anoh S, Gomez P, Munjanja S. Antenatal care. Opportunities for Africa’s newborns: Practical data, policy and programmatic support for newborn care in Africa. 2006. p. 55–62.

  50. Jinga N, Mongwenyana C, Moolla A, Malete G, Onoya D. Reasons for late presentation for antenatal care, healthcare providers’ perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Chimatiro CS, Hajison P, Chipeta E, Muula AS. Understanding barriers preventing pregnant women from starting antenatal clinic in the first trimester of pregnancy in Ntcheu District-Malawi. Reprod Health. 2018;15(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. White D, Dynes M, Rubardt M, Sissoko K, Stephenson R. The influence of intrafamilial power on maternal health care in Mali: perspectives of women, men and mothers-in-law. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013;1:58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kea AZ, Tulloch O, Datiko DG, Theobald S, Kok MC. Exploring barriers to the use of formal maternal health services and priority areas for action in Sidama zone, southern Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Edu BC, Agan TU, Monjok E, Makowiecka K. Effect of free maternal health care program on health-seeking behaviour of women during pregnancy, intra-partum and postpartum periods in Cross River State of Nigeria: a mixed method study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2017;5(3):370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kaba M, Bulto T, Tafesse Z, Lingerh W, Ali I. Sociocultural determinants of home delivery in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Int J Women’s Health. 2016;8:93.

  56. Kumbani L, Bjune G, Chirwa E, Odland JØ. Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: a qualitative study of women’s perceptions of perinatal care from rural Southern Malawi. Reprod Health. 2013;10(1):1–2.

  57. Lowe M, Chen DR, Huang SL. Social and cultural factors affecting maternal health in rural Gambia: an exploratory qualitative study. PloS One. 2016;11(9):e0163653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Lowe M. Social and cultural barriers to husbands’ involvement in maternal health in rural Gambia. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:255.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Jammeh A, Sundby J, Vangen S. Barriers to emergency obstetric care services in perinatal deaths in rural Gambia: a qualitative in-depth interview study. Int Sch Res Notices. 2011;2011:981096.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Dimbuene ZT, Amo-Adjei J, Amugsi D, Mumah J, Izugbara CO, Beguy D. Women’s education and utilization of maternal health services in Africa: a multi-country and socioeconomic status analysis. J Biosoc Sci. 2018;50(6):725–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Ovikuomagbe O. Determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Nigeria. Afr Res Rev. 2017;11(2):283–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Singh A, Kumar A, Pranjali P. Utilization of maternal healthcare among adolescent mothers in urban India: evidence from DLHS-3. PeerJ. 2014;2:e592.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Tsawe M, Susuman AS. Determinants of access to and use of maternal health care services in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: a quantitative and qualitative investigation. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Larsen A, Exavery A, Phillips JF, Tani K, Kanté AM. Predictors of health care seeking behavior during pregnancy, delivery, and the postnatal period in rural Tanzania. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20(8):1726–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Nuamah GB, Agyei-Baffour P, Mensah KA, Boateng D, Quansah DY, Dobin D, Addai-Donkor K. Access and utilization of maternal healthcare in a rural district in the forest belt of Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lagerberg D, Magnusson M. Utilization of child health services, stress, social support and child characteristics in primiparous and multiparous mothers of 18-month-old children. Scand J Public Health. 2013;41(4):374–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Celik Y, Hotchkiss DR. The socio-economic determinants of maternal health care utilization in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(12):1797–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Amu H, Nyarko SH. Satisfaction with maternal healthcare services in the Ketu South municipality, Ghana: a qualitative case study. Biomed Res Int. 2019;10:2019.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mannava P, Durrant K, Fisher J, Chersich M, Luchters S. Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review. Glob Health. 2015;11(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Onasoga OA, Opiah MM, Osaji TA, Iwolisi A. Perceived effects of midwives attitude towards women in labour in Bayelsa State. Nigeria Appl Sci Res. 2012;4(2):960–4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Matsuoka S, Aiga H, Rasmey LC, Rathavy T, Okitsu A. Perceived barriers to utilization of maternal health services in rural Cambodia. Health Policy. 2010;95(2–3):255–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Sanogo NA, Yaya S. Wealth status, health insurance, and maternal health care utilization in Africa: evidence from Gabon. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:12–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Suparmi IB, Lestari H. Health insurance as a solution for barriers to maternal healthcare access in Indonesia.2019. Retrieved from http://www.healthpolicyplus.com/ns/pubs/17359-17647_PBHealthInsurance.pdf on 12/05/2021

  74. Wang W, Temsah G, Mallick L. The impact of health insurance on maternal health care utilization: evidence from Ghana, Indonesia and Rwanda. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(3):366–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nguyen HT, Hatt L, Islam M, Sloan NL, Chowdhury J, Schmidt JO, Hossain A, Wang H. Encouraging maternal health service utilization: an evaluation of the Bangladesh voucher program. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(7):989–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Wagner AK, Graves AJ, Reiss SK, LeCates R, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Access to care and medicines, burden of health care expenditures, and risk protection: results from the world health survey. Health Policy. 2011;100(2–3):151–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Yaya S. Wealth status, health insurance, and maternal health care utilization in Africa: evidence from Gabon. Biomed Res Int. 2020;11:2020.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Bonfrer I, Breebaart L, Van de Poel E. The effects of Ghana’s national health insurance scheme on maternal and infant health care utilization. PloS One. 2016;11(11):e0165623.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ouendo EM, Makoutodé M, Paraiso MN, Wilmet-Dramaix M, Dujardin B. Itinéraire thérapeutique des malades indigents au Bénin (pauvreté et soins de santé). Tropical Med Int Health. 2005;10(2):179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Ahmed MAA, Hamelin-Brabant L, Gagnon MP. Sociocultural determinants of nomadic women’s utilization of assisted childbirth in Gossi, Mali: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sumankuuro J, Crockett J, Wang S. Sociocultural barriers to maternity services delivery: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature. Public Health. 2018;157:77–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Islam MR, Odland JO. Determinants of antenatal and postnatal care visits among indigenous people in Bangladesh: a study of the Mru community. Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):112.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ndidi EP, Oseremen IG. Reasons given by pregnant women for late initiation of antenatal care in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Ghana Medical J. 2010;44(2):47.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Lewis G. Maternal mortality in the developing world: why do mothers really die? Obstet Med. 2008;1:2–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Dahab R, Sakellariou D. Barriers to accessing maternal care in low income countries in Africa: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4292.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Lama S, Krishna AK. Barriers in utilization of maternal health care services: perceptions of rural women in Eastern Nepal. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2014;12(4):253–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Kumi-Kyereme A, Amu H, Darteh EK. Barriers and motivations for health insurance subscription in Cape Coast, Ghana: a qualitative study. Archives of Public Health. 2017;75(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Amu H, Dickson KS. Health insurance subscription among women in reproductive age in Ghana: do socio-demographics matter? Heal Econ Rev. 2016;6(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Lu C, Schneider MT, Gubbins P, Leach-Kemon K, Jamison D, Murray CJ. Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-national systematic analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1375–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Wilunda C, Scanagatta C, Putoto G, Takahashi R, Montalbetti F, Segafredo G, Betran AP. Barriers to institutional childbirth in Rumbek North County, South Sudan: a qualitative study. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Arnold J, Samson M, Schechter J, Goodwin AS, Braganza S, Sesso GC, Lopez A, Fiori K. Getting there: overcoming barriers to reproductive and maternal health services access in Northern Togo: a qualitative study. World Med Health Policy. 2016;8:223–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yaya S, Bishwajit G, Shah V. Wealth, education and urban–rural inequality and maternal healthcare service usage in Malawi. BMJ Glob Health. 2016;1(2):e000085.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Arthur E. Wealth and antenatal care use: implications for maternal health care utilisation in Ghana. Heal Econ Rev. 2012;2(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Barriers to antenatal care use in Nigeria: evidences from non-users and implications for maternal health programming. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1.

  95. Fagbamigbe AF, Idemudia ES. Wealth and antenatal care utilization in Nigeria: policy implications. Health Care Women Int. 2017;38(1):17–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Rizkianti A, Afifah T, Saptarini I, Rakhmadi MF. Women’s decision-making autonomy in the household and the use of maternal health services: an Indonesian case study. Midwifery. 2020;90:102816.

  97. Yaya S, Uthman OA, Bishwajit G, Ekholuenetale M. Maternal health care service utilization in post-war Liberia: analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional household surveys. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Mehari K, Wencheko E. Factors affecting maternal health care services utilization in rural Ethiopia: a study based on the 2011 EDHS data. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2013;27(1):16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Chol C, Negin J, Agho KE, Cumming RG. Women’s autonomy and utilisation of maternal healthcare services in 31 Sub-Saharan African countries: results from the demographic and health surveys, 2010–2016. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e023128.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Pokhrel S, Sauerborn R. Household decision-making on child health care in developing countries: the case of Nepal. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(4):218–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Osamor PE, Grady C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature. Int J Women’s Health. 2016;8:191.

  102. Tanou M, Kamiya Y. Assessing the impact of geographical access to health facilities on maternal healthcare utilization: evidence from the Burkina Faso demographic and health survey 2010. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Gudu W, Addo B. Factors associated with utilization of skilled service delivery among women in rural Northern Ghana: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Dahiru T, Oche OM. Determinants of antenatal care, institutional delivery and postnatal care services utilization in Nigeria. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22(1):321.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Zelalem Ayele D, Belayihun B, Teji K, Admassu Ayana D. actors affecting utilization of maternal health care services in Kombolcha District, eastern Hararghe zone, Oromia regional state, eastern Ethiopia. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014:917058.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Say L, Raine R. A systematic review of inequalities in the use of maternal health care in developing countries: examining the scale of the problem and the importance of context. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:812–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Adde KS, Dickson KS, Amu H. Prevalence and determinants of the place of delivery among reproductive age women in sub–Saharan Africa. Plos One. 2020;15(12):e0244875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Kweku M, Amu H, Adjuik M, Aku FY, Manu E, Tarkang EE, Komesuor J, Asalu GA, Amuna NN, Boateng LA, Alornyo JS. Community utilisation and satisfaction with the community-based health planning and services initiative in Ghana: a comparative study in two system learning districts of the CHPS+ project. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Annim SK, Mariwah S, Sebu J. Spatial inequality and household poverty in Ghana. Econ Syst. 2012;36(4):487–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare [MoHaCW]. The Zimbabwe National Maternal and Neonatal Health Road Map 2007–2015. Harare: Ministry of Health and Child Welfare; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Amu H, Seidu AA, Agbaglo E, Dowou RK, Ameyaw EK, Ahinkorah BO, Kissah-Korsah K. Mixed effects analysis of factors associated with health insurance coverage among women in sub-Saharan Africa. Plos One. 2021;16(3):e0248411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the DHS Programme fror making the data available to us.

Funding

None. This study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Social Science, Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health (LIIRH), University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Luchuo Engelbert Bain

  2. Department of Family and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Richard Gyan Aboagye

  3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Robert Kokou Dowou

  4. United Nation’s Population Fund, UNFPA, Bamako, Mali

    Eugene Justine Kongnyuy

  5. Division of Epidemiology and Prevention: Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore Maryland, USA

    Peter Memiah

  6. Department of Population and Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Hubert Amu

Authors
  1. Luchuo Engelbert Bain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Gyan Aboagye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Kokou Dowou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eugene Justine Kongnyuy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter Memiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hubert Amu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LEB, RGA, and HA conceptualised and designed the study. LEB, RGA, RKD, EJK, PM and HA developed the initial manuscript and subsequently reviewed it. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work before it was finally submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hubert Amu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical permission was not sought for the present study since the DHS datasets used are publicly available. However, the DHS reports that ethical clearances were obtained from the Ethics Committee of ORC Macro Inc. as well as Ethics Boards of partner organisations of the various countries such as the Ministries of Health. The DHS follows the standards for ensuring the protection of respondents’ privacy. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. Since the study used secondary data, it was not applicable for us to contact the participants directly for their consent before publishing our work. Consent entire was obtained from particpants in the original DHS survey whose data we only picked and worked on.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1.

Description of sample.

Additional file 2.

STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bain, L.E., Aboagye, R.G., Dowou, R.K. et al. Prevalence and determinants of maternal healthcare utilisation among young women in sub-Saharan Africa: cross-sectional analyses of demographic and health survey data. BMC Public Health 22, 647 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13037-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13037-8

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us