Skip to main content
Download PDF

Socio-demographic characteristics associated with the dietary diversity of Thai community-dwelling older people: results from the national health examination survey

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 377 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Dietary diversity (DD) is an indicator of nutrient intake and is related to health outcomes in older people. Currently, limited research exists regarding factors associated with DD in older people in developing countries, such as Thailand, despite rapid growth in this population. Therefore, this study aims to examine the association between socio-demographic characteristics and DD in Thai older people.

Methods

A cross-sectional study based on the fifth Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES-V) conducted between 2013 and 2015 was performed. A total of 7,300 nationally representative older participants aged ≥ 60 years were included. The individual-level dietary diversity score (DDS) was assessed as the frequency of consumption of eight food groups using food frequency questionnaires. Each food group was scored from 0 to 4 according to the frequency of consumption. The DDS was calculated as the sum of the scores, ranging from 0 to 32. Socio-demographic characteristics, including age, sex, highest education level, wealth index, living conditions, and residential area, were assessed. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and adjusted for complex survey design.

Results

The participants had a mean age of 69.7 (SD 7.6) years. The mean DDS of participants was 18.4 (SD 3.9). In the adjusted model, a higher educational level, a higher wealth index, and living in an urban area were positively associated with DDS, with adjusted β (95% CI) values of 1.37 (1.04, 1.70) for secondary education or higher, 0.81 (0.55, 1.06) for the richest group, and 0.24 (0.10, 0.44) for living in an urban area. Nevertheless, living alone had negative associations with DDS, with a β (95% CI) of - 0.27 (- 0.53, - 0.00).

Conclusions

This study showed that a higher educational level, a higher wealth index, and living in an urban area had a positive association, whereas living alone had a negative association with DD among Thai older participants. Interventions aiming to improve dietary diversity among older people might benefit from targeting more vulnerable groups, particularly those with less education and wealth, those living alone, or those in rural areas.

Peer Review reports

Background

The growth of the aging population is one of the major concerns in global health. Globally, the number of people aged 60 years or over surpassed that of under-five children in 2018 [1]. Due to their physical and socio-economic limitations, older people may suffer from several adverse health conditions. The aims of the care process in this population include healthy aging and longevity. Good nutritional status and healthy eating have been shown to prevent mortality from non-communicable diseases, increase quality of life, and enhance healthy aging [2, 3].

Eating a variety of foods is one component of healthy eating and has been recommended in several food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) [4, 5]. Dietary diversity (DD) is defined as the number of different food groups consumed over a time period [6] and has been suggested as an indicator for evaluating nutrient intake [7]. DD has been shown to affect gut microbiome, micronutrients level as well as muscle mass, etc. [8,9,10]. Diversity of food consumption relates to many health outcomes in older people, including malnutrition, cognitive function, and mortality [11,12,13].

DD is affected by several factors, such as age, sex, physical and mental health, and social and macro-environment factors, such as policies [12, 14,15,16]. For example, older people tend to have less dietary diversity than the younger population because they rely on their familiar experiences and their dietary restrictions according to their health status [17]. Further, cooking skills have been suggested as a determinant for dietary diversity, and the male elderly who tend to have lower cooking skills are shown to have lower DD than the female elderly [18]. Policies can also influence DD. As an example, a significant improvement was observed in DD among the elderly population in South Africa who were part of a food aid program [19].

Although there are previous studies evaluating factors associated with DD among older people, most of these studies were confined to high-income countries (HICs) in particular regions. Currently, there is limited evidence regarding the factors associated with DD in older people in lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs). There are some differences between high- versus lower- and middle-income countries in factors associated with dietary diversity, such as the equality of education or economic support [20]. Therefore, studies from LMICs are valuable to expand the existing knowledge and enable a comparison between the various settings.

Thailand is an upper-middle-income country in Southeast Asia with one of the most rapidly growing older populations in the world. The number of people aged 60 and over in Thailand is expected to increase from 19.2% to 2019 to 35.6% by 2050 [21]. Currently, the double burden of malnutrition is a common health problem in Thai older people [22]. A previous study of Thai female older people found that economic status acts as a vital determinant of food security [23]. Moreover, in a previous qualitative study, Thai older people emphasized the availability of food in their community as a factor influencing their food choices [17]. However, there is no study evaluating the socio-demographic characteristics associated with DD in older people in Thailand. Considering the importance of dietary patterns for the health and wellbeing of older people, understanding the factors associated with DD is necessary in order to develop effective interventions [24]. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the association between socio-demographic characteristics and DD among older people in Thailand using nationally representative data.

Methods

Study design and study population

This study was a cross-sectional study based on the fifth Thai National Health Examination Survey (NHES-V). The NHES-V was a nationally representative survey using multistage, stratified sampling of the Thai population. The survey was conducted from October 2013 to February 2015, and the demographic characteristics and socio-economic status of the participants were collected via face-to-face interviews. In cases in which older participants could not communicate or had cognitive problems, information was collected from their informant caregivers. The details of this survey are described elsewhere [25]. A total of 23,760 individuals were invited to participate in the NHES-V, among whom 8,640 were aged 60 years and older. The response rate in the older participant group was 85.2%, resulting in 7,365 older participants in this study. Sixty-five participants were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete dietary data. A total of 7,300 older participants were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1). Excluded participants (n = 65) had a significantly higher educational level and wealth index; no other significant differences were observed between the final sample and the excluded participants.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of older participants included in the analysis 

Full size image

Data collection

Dietary diversity score (DDS)

A 34-item semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to assess participants’ habitual eating behaviors. The questionnaire was developed based on the commonly consumed food items in Thailand and has been shown to have high internal consistency [26]. FFQs were administered by trained interviewers using pictures of food to facilitate answers.

The dietary diversity score (DDS) was calculated based on a locally adapted version of guidelines, endorsed by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [27] and an FBDG for Thais [5]. The original version of the DDS from the FAO contained 10 food groups, namely, grain or white roots or tubers, pulse and beans, nuts and seeds, dairy, meat or poultry or fish, eggs, dark green leafy vegetables, other vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, other vegetables, and other fruits. In the adapted version, dark green leafy vegetables, other vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, other vegetables, and other fruits were collapsed and reclassified as a vegetables group and a fruits group due to the availability of data from the FFQ. Pulse and beans were also merged with the nuts and seeds food group to comply with dietary patterns in the Thai context [5]. The fat and oil group is one of the main food groups in the FBDG for Thailand and an optional food group in the DDS from the FAO [5, 27]. Thus, the oil and fat group was included in this DDS, resulting in 8 food groups. Each food group contained five choices for the frequency of consumption: (1) never eat or eat less than once per month (0 points), (2) eat once to three times per month (1 point), (3) eat once to three times per week (2 points), (4) eat 4 – 6 times per week (3 points), and (5) eat once per day or more (4 points). The DDS was calculated as the sum of the score for each food group, which ranged from 0 to 32. A higher DDS indicates better dietary diversity.

Socio-demographic characteristics associated with dietary diversity

The socio-demographic characteristics of the older participants, including sex, age, highest education level, wealth index, living condition and residential area, were collected via face-to-face interviews. In line with previous studies [28], the age of the participants, which was collected from the identification card, was classified as young old (60 – 74 years), old-old (75 – 84 years), or oldest old (≥ 85 years). The highest education level was classified into three categories (no formal education, primary education, and secondary education and above). The wealth index indicated participants’ economic status by assessing participants’ household assets (bed, washing machine, electric water heater, air conditioner, microwave, electric kettle, PC, telephone, car, and flushing toilet). The wealth index was derived from the first factor loading, which was obtained from the principal component analysis. The wealth index score was further categorized into quintiles. The lowest quintile indicated the poorest group, and the highest indicated the richest group [29]. Living condition was dichotomized as living alone or living with others. Residential area was categorized into urban and rural. Urban and rural areas were defined as the areas inside and outside of local municipalities, respectively.

Data analyses

The data were analyzed by using STATA/SE version 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, U.S.A.). Adjustment for complex survey design was applied in the analyses. This adjustment accounted for clustering and weighting of older participants by using a set of Svy commands in STATA [30]. This study used weighting based on the sampling probability against the 2014 registered Thai population [25]. Chi-squared tests were used to compare the background characteristics of participants who were excluded from the analysis with those of the final sample. Descriptive statistics are presented as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as the mean with standard deviation (SD) or 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for continuous variables. The normality of the DDS data was examined by constructing a histogram. The mean differences in DDS between two groups and more than two groups were tested by Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), respectively. Factors associated with the DDS were evaluated by using simple and multiple linear regression models after the assumptions for linear regression were met. The association between socio-demographic characteristics and the DDS was represented by beta coefficients (β) and 95% CIs. Multicollinearity was also checked with the generalized variance inflation factor (GVIF) [31] using the R statistical software package car [32]. The GVIF did not exceed 1.37 for any variable, indicating no evidence of multicollinearity. All the variables showing a significant association with the DDS in unadjusted models, namely, age, sex, highest educational level, wealth index, living alone, and residential area, were entered in the multivariate analysis. The results were considered statistically significant at a P-value < 0.05.

Results

A total of 7,300 older participants were included in this study (Fig. 1). The participants had a mean (SD) age of 69.7 (7.6) years. The mean DDS was 18.4 (SD 3.9) (data not shown). Table 1 shows the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Approximately 44% of the older participants were male. Nearly 75% of them were 60 – 74 years old. Most of the older participants had completed primary education or higher. The weighted prevalence of living alone was approximately 8%. More than 40% of the older participants lived in urban areas.

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of older participants based on the NHES-V, Thailand (n 7,300)
Full size table

Table 2 shows the distribution of the mean DDS by the socio-demographic characteristics of the older participants. The mean DDS among the male older participants was slightly higher than among the female older participants (18.4 vs. 18.3, P-value 0.007). The mean DDS decreased by age group (P-value < 0.001). Older participants who had a higher education level had a significantly higher mean DDS than those who had a lower education level (P-value < 0.001). Similarly, the mean DDS of the older participants who had a higher wealth index was higher than that of the poorer group (P < 0.001). The mean DDS of the older participants who lived alone was significantly lower than that of the older participants who lived with others (17.9 vs. 18.4, P-value <0.001), and the mean DDS of the older participants who resided in an urban area was higher than that of the older participants who lived in a rural area (18.7 vs. 18.1, P-value <0.001).

Table 2 DDS based on the socio-demographic characteristics of older participants in the NHES-V, Thailand (n 7,300)
Full size table

Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models evaluating the associations between the socio-demographic characteristics and DDS of the older participants. In the unadjusted regression model, female older participants had a lower DDS than male older participants (β - 0.19, 95% CI: - 0.32, - 0.06). Older participants who were older had a significantly lower DDS than the young old group (β - 0.43, 95% CI: - 0.63, - 0.22 for age 75 – 84 years and β - 0.61, 95% CI: - 0.96, - 0.26 for age 85 years or above). Compared to older participants with no formal education, those who had higher education had a significantly higher DDS (β 1.00, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.23 for primary education and β 1.97, 95% CI: 1.70, 2.23 for secondary education and higher). In addition, older participants who were richest had a higher DDS than the poorest groups (β 1.29, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.53). Older participants who lived alone had a significantly lower DDS than those who lived with others (β - 0.51, 95% CI: - 0.75, - 0.27), while older participants who lived in urban areas had a significantly higher DDS than their counterparts who lived in rural areas (β 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.69).

Table 3 Association between the socio-demographic characteristics and DDS of older participants in the NHES-V, Thailand
Full size table

In the adjusted models, the results showed that education level, wealth index, and living in an urban area had a positive association, whereas living alone had a negative association with the DDS. Older participants who had a higher education level had a significantly higher DDS than the older participants with no formal education (β 0.76, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.03 for primary education and β 1.37, 95% CI: 1.04 1.70 for secondary and higher education). Similarly, older participants who were richest had a higher DDS than the poorest group (β 0.81, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.06 for the richest group). Regarding living conditions, older participants who were living alone had a lower DDS than participants who were living with others (β - 0.27, 95% CI: - 0.53, - 0.00). Finally, older participants who lived in urban areas had a higher DDS than those who lived in rural areas (β 0.27, 95% CI: 0.10, 0.44). However, sex and age were no longer significantly associated with DDS in the adjusted model.

Discussion

This study examined the socio-demographic characteristics associated with dietary diversity among community-dwelling older people in Thailand. The results showed that a higher educational level, a higher wealth index, and living in an urban area had a positive association, whereas living alone had a negative association with DD in this population.

In the present study, a higher educational level had a positive association with DD. Older participants educated at the primary school level or above had significantly higher levels of DD than those with no formal education. Additionally, a study in health care units in Brazil showed that older participants who attained education for ≥ 9 years had a higher variety of food group consumption and a higher healthy eating index than those who had 0 – 4 years of education [33] One possible explanation is that education level can influence the level of nutritional knowledge among participants and ultimately result in higher DD. Older participants who attained at least a secondary school education have been shown to have better nutritional knowledge than those with a primary school education [34]. In addition, obtaining nutritional information from various sources has been shown to be more common among older populations with higher education levels [35]. Furthermore, people who have a higher educational level might have higher income and thus better purchasing power than people who have a lower educational level. However, the association between education and DD in older participants is still uncertain. Although many studies have found a positive association between level of education and DD, a negative or no association between education and DD has been reported in some studies [14, 36, 37]. A possible explanation for these results may be differences in the study setting. The study that showed a negative association between education and DD was conducted among Spanish people who were born in the 1940 – 1960 s. The female population in this period had less opportunity to receive education, while they had higher DD than their male counterparts. This might explain the negative association that was found between education and DD in that study [14]. The studies that demonstrated no association between level of education and DD were mainly performed in high-income countries where participants have education equity and obtaining a proper education is common. Therefore, the effect of education on DD might have been diminished. The current study was performed in Thailand, where the education level is heterogeneous across the population; therefore, the association between this factor and DD appeared significant.

With regard to the wealth index, this study found a positive association between the wealth index and DD. Our finding was consistent with a previous study that was conducted among Japanese older participants and found an association between DD and annual income for both sexes [15]. Both individual and household income have been shown to affect elderly participants’ DD [15, 38]. A possible explanation is that participants with better economic status might spend more money on food. A study among Taiwanese older participants found that older participants with higher DD spent two times more money on food purchases than participants with lower DD [39].

In this study, living alone had a negative association with DD. This finding is in agreement with a previous study in Japan that found that older participants who were living alone had significantly lower DD than their counterparts who were living with others [40]. These findings further support the idea that loneliness and social deprivation may affect older people’s eating habits [41]. A qualitative study in the UK found that older participants who were living alone felt that eating alone was less enjoyable than eating with others, and they often purchased less food than when they used to buy food for their whole family [42]. Moreover, a recent qualitative study exploring food choice in Thai older participants showed that participants who were living alone did not feel hungry and often skipped meals as a consequence of loneliness [17].

Another important finding in this study was that older participants who lived in urban areas had higher DD than those who lived in rural areas. This finding is congruent with a previous study in China that showed that urban residents had significantly higher DD than rural residents [43]. Moreover, a nationally representative survey in Korea found that older participants who lived in urban areas had higher healthy eating index scores and DD than their rural counterparts [44]. A possible explanation might be the higher accessibility of food in urban settings. Poor fruit and vegetable consumption in older participants who lived far from supermarkets and stores has been reported previously [45]. The density of food stores and supermarkets in urban areas is significantly higher than that in rural areas [46]. Therefore, older participants in urban areas might be closer to food stores and have more opportunity to access food than those living in rural areas.

In this study, sex did not have an association with DD. This result accords with an earlier study among Brazilian older participants [34]. However, many previous studies have reported a difference in DD based on sex [8, 14]. In addition, no significant association between age and DD was observed in our study. The evidence for the association between age and DD is still inconclusive [14, 38]. A possible explanation for this might be that older participants in the old-old and oldest-old groups (age 75 – 84 and > 85 years) could not perform activities of daily living, such as shopping or preparing food, so their caregivers took responsibility for taking care of and providing food for them [47]. This may be the reason why the association between age and DD was not shown. Another possible explanation is the relatively small sample size, particularly for the oldest-old group, which might have prevented us from detecting the differences between the age groups.

The strengths of this study were the large sample size, relatively high response rate, and use of a nationally representative sample. Moreover, currently, there are few studies on the determinants of DD in LMICs. To the best of our knowledge, no such study has been done in Thailand. Therefore, this study can fill this knowledge gap. In addition, the reliability of the eating habit data could be ensured because the information was derived from older participants or their informant caregivers.

However, this study had several limitations. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, the temporal relationship cannot be established. Another concern was that the DDS, because it was derived from a semi-quantitative FFQ, could not reflect the amount of each food group. Moreover, the overall food groups in this study were adjusted to comply with the Thai context and FBDG for Thailand, which makes it difficult to generalize our findings to other settings [5]. Although the FFQs were designed and tested prior to the survey to capture the common dietary pattern in Thailand, there was a possibility of missing some rare food items. Regarding bias, the missing data in assessing the wealth index might cause selection bias. We excluded 65 participants from the final analysis due to incomplete dietary data. The excluded participants had a higher education and wealth index; however, since the number of excluded participants was extremely small (less than 1% of the total sample), the likelihood of selection bias is unlikely in this case. Additionally, the possibility of recall bias should be considered, especially for those with memory problems. Finally, several factors that might have affected DD were not addressed, such as caregivers’ characteristics, or factors regarding food environment such as the food availability, which could lead to residual confounders.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates the association between socio-demographic characteristics and DD in community-dwelling Thai older participants. A higher education level, a higher wealth index, and living in an urban area had a positive association, while living alone had a negative association with DD in this setting. These findings suggest that policies and nutritional interventions that focus on older people with lower wealth and education levels and older people who live alone or in rural areas might help to increase DD in older people.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analysed are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

DD:

Dietary diversity

NHES-V:

The fifth Thai National Health Examination Survey

DDS:

Dietary diversity score

SD:

Standard deviation

β:

Beta coefficient

95% CI:

95% confidence interval

FBDG:

Food-Based Dietary Guidelines

HIC:

High-income countries

LMIC:

Lower- and middle-income countries

FFQ:

Food frequency questionnaire

FAO:

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

GVIF:

Generalized variance inflation factor

References

  1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World population ageing 2019 (ST/ESA/SER.A/444). New York,USA: United Nations; 2020

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM, Miller PE, Liese AD, Kahle LL, Park Y, Subar AF. Higher diet quality is associated with decreased risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and cancer mortality among older adults. J Nutr. 2014; 144(6):881–889.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Milte CM, Thorpe MG, Crawford D, Ball K, McNaughton SA. Associations of diet quality with health-related quality of life in older Australian men and women. Exp Gerontol. 2015; 64:8–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Herforth A, Arimond M, Álvarez-Sánchez C, Coates J, Christianson K, Muehlhoff E. A Global review of food-based dietary guidelines. Adv Nutr, 2019; 10(4):590–605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sirichakwal PP, Sranacharoenpong K, Tontisirin K. Food based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) development and promotion in Thailand. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2011; 20(3):477–483.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruel MT. Operationalizing dietary diversity: a review of measurement issues and research priorities. J Nutr 2003; 133(11):3911S-3926S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tavakoli S, Dorosty-Motlagh AR, Hoshiar-Rad A, Eshraghian MR, Sotoudeh G, Azadbakht L, Karimi M, Jalali-Farahani S. Is dietary diversity a proxy measurement of nutrient adequacy in Iranian elderly women? Appetite. 2016; 105:468–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yokoyama Y, Nishi M, Murayama H, Amano H, Taniguchi Y, Nofuji Y, Narita M, Matsuo E, Seino S, Kawano Y et al. Association of dietary variety with body composition and physical function in community-dwelling elderly Japanese. J Nutr Health Aging. 2016; 20(7):691–696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Heiman ML, Greenway FL. A healthy gastrointestinal microbiome is dependent on dietary diversity. Mol Metab. 2016; 5(5):317–320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rathnayake KM, Madushani PAE, Silva K. Use of dietary diversity score as a proxy indicator of nutrient adequacy of rural elderly people in Sri Lanka. BMC Res Notes. 2012; 5(1):469.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kobayashi M, Sasazuki S, Shimazu T, Sawada N, Yamaji T, Iwasaki M, Mizoue T, Tsugane S. Association of dietary diversity with total mortality and major causes of mortality in the Japanese population: JPHC study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020; 74(1):54–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsuji T, Yamamoto K, Yamasaki K, Hayashi F, Momoki C, Yasui Y, Ohfuji S, Fukushima W, Habu D. Lower dietary variety is a relevant factor for malnutrition in older Japanese home-care recipients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2019; 19(1):197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang J, Zhao A, Wu W, Yang C, Ren Z, Wang M, Wang P, Zhang Y. Dietary Diversity Is Associated With Memory Status in Chinese Adults: A Prospective Study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2020;12(282):580760.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cano-Ibáñez N, Gea A, Martínez-González MA, Salas-Salvadó J, Corella D, Zomeño MD, Romaguera D, Vioque J, Aros F, Wärnberg J et al. Dietary diversity and nutritional adequacy among an older spanish population with metabolic syndrome in the PREDIMED-Plus Study: a cross-sectional analysis. Nutrients. 2019; 11(5):958.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fukuda Y, Ishikawa M, Yokoyama T, Hayashi T, Nakaya T, Takemi Y, Kusama K, Yoshiike N, Nozue M, Yoshiba K et al. Physical and social determinants of dietary variety among older adults living alone in Japan. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17(11):2232–2238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin Z, Fei Z, Qiu C, Brasher MS, Kraus VB, Zhao W, Shi X, Zeng Y. Dietary diversity and cognitive function among elderly people: a population-based study. J Nutr Health Aging, 2017; 21(10):1089–1094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chalermsri C, Herzig van Wees S, Ekström EC, Muangpaisan W, Rahman SM. Exploring the Experience and Determinants of the Food Choices and Eating Practices of Elderly Thai People: A Qualitative Study. Nutrients. 2020;12(11):3497.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Terragni L, Arnold CD, Henjum S. Food Skills and Their Relationship with Food Security and Dietary Diversity Among Asylum Seekers Living in Norway. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2020; 52(11):1026–1034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Oldewage Theron WH, Kruger R. Impact of food aid on food variety and dietary diversity of an elderly community in Sharpeville, South Africa. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009; 13(4):300–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cano-Ibáñez N, Gea A, Martínez-González MA, Salas-Salvadó J, Corella D, Zomeño MD, Romaguera D, Vioque J, Aros F, Wärnberg J, et al. Dietary Diversity and Nutritional Adequacy among an Older Spanish Population with Metabolic Syndrome in the PREDIMED-Plus Study: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):958.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. HelpAge International. Ageing population in Thailand. 2019. https://ageingasia.org/ageing-population-thailand/. Accessed 25 Feb 2021.

  22. Churak P, Praditsorn P, Meenongwah J, Wimonpeerapattana W. Factors associated with nutritional status of elderly in ubon ratchathani, Thailand. Asia-Pac J Sci Technol. 2019; 24:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Piaseu N, Komindr S, Belza B. Understanding food insecurity among Thai older women in an urban community. Health Care Women Int. 2010; 31(12):1110–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thanakwang K, Soonthorndhada K, Mongkolprasoet J. Perspectives on healthy aging among Thai elderly: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2012; 14(4):472–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yan LD, Hanvoravongchai P, Aekplakorn W, Chariyalertsak S, Kessomboon P, Assanangkornchai S, Taneepanichskul S, Neelapaichit N, Stokes AC. Universal coverage but unmet need: national and regional estimates of attrition across the diabetes care continuum in Thailand. PLoS One. 2020; 15(1):e0226286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aekplakorn W, Satheannoppakao W, Putwatana P, Taneepanichskul S, Kessomboon P, Chongsuvivatwong V, Chariyalertsak S. Dietary pattern and metabolic syndrome in thai adults. J Nutr Metab. 2015;2015:468759.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. FAO. Minimum dietary diversity for women. Rome: FAO; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seccombe K, Ishii-Kuntz M. Perceptions of problems associated with aging: comparisons among four older age cohorts. Gerontologist. 1991; 31(4):527–533.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Srithanaviboonchai K, Moongtui W, Panpanich R, Suwanteerangkul J, Chariyalertsak S, Sangthong R, Kessomboon P, Putwatana P, Nontarak J, Aekplakorn W. Characteristics and determinants of Thailand’s declining birth rate in women age 35 to 59 years old: data from the fourth national health examination survey. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014; 97(2):225–231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kreuter F, Valliant R. A survey on survey statistics: what is done and can be done in stata. Stata J. 2007; 7:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fox J, Monette G. Generalized collinearity diagnostics. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992; 87(417):178–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Freitas T, Previdelli A, Ferreira M, Marques K, Goulart R, Aquino R. Factors associated with diet quality of older adults. Rev Nutr. 2017; 30:297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jeruszka-Bielak M, Kollajtis-Dolowy A, Santoro A, Ostan R, Berendsen AAM, Jennings A, Meunier N, Marseglia A, Caumon E, Gillings R et al. Are nutrition-related knowledge and attitudes reflected in lifestyle and health among elderly people? A study across five European Countries. Front Physiol. 2018; 9:994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Siew Man C, Kaur J, Lim K, Ho B, S M. Use and understanding of nutrition labeling among elderly men and women in Malaysia. Mal J Nutr. 2013: 19:353–362.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Otsuka R, Nishita Y, Tange C, Tomida M, Kato Y, Nakamoto M, Imai T, Ando F, Shimokata H. Dietary diversity decreases the risk of cognitive decline among Japanese older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017; 17(6):937–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Appleton KM, Dinnella C, Spinelli S, Morizet D, Saulais L, Hemingway A, Monteleone E, Depezay L, Perez-Cueto FJA, Hartwell H. Consumption of a high quantity and a wide variety of vegetables are predicted by different food choice motives in older adults from France, Italy and the UK. Nutrients. 2017; 9(9):923.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lo YT, Wahlqvist ML, Chang YH, Lee MS. Combined effects of chewing ability and dietary diversity on medical service use and expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016; 64(6):1187–1194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lo YT, Chang YH, Lee MS, Wahlqvist ML. Dietary diversity and food expenditure as indicators of food security in older Taiwanese. Appetite. 2012; 58(1):180–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kimura Y, Wada T, Okumiya K, Ishimoto Y, Fukutomi E, Kasahara Y, Chen W, Sakamoto R, Fujisawa M, Otsuka K et al. Eating alone among community-dwelling Japanese elderly: association with depression and food diversity. J Nutr Health Aging. 2012; 16(8):728–731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bloom I, Lawrence W, Barker M, Baird J, Dennison E, Sayer AA, Cooper C, Robinson S. What influences diet quality in older people? A qualitative study among community-dwelling older adults from the hertfordshire cohort study, UK. Public Health Nutr. 2017; 20(15):2685–2693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Whitelock E, Ensaff H. On your own: older adults’ food choice and dietary habits. Nutrients. 2018; 10(4):413.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang H, Liu C, Fan H, Tian X. Rising food accessibility contributed to the increasing dietary diversity in rural and urban China. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017; 26:738–747.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Park S, Kim HJ, Kim K. Do where the elderly live matter? Factors associated with diet quality among Korean elderly population living in urban versus rural areas. Nutrients.2020; 12(5):1314.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharkey JR, Johnson CM, Dean WR. Food access and perceptions of the community and household food environment as correlates of fruit and vegetable intake among rural seniors. BMC Geriatr. 2010; 10:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Spires M, Berggreen-Clausen A, Kasujja FX, Delobelle P, Puoane T, Sanders D, Daivadanam M. Snapshots of urban and rural food environments: epoch-based mapping in a high-, middle-, and low-income country from a non-communicable disease perspective. Nutrients. 2020; 12(2):484.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Picco L, Abdin E, Vaingankar JA, Pang S, Shafie S, Sambasivam R, Chong SA, Subramaniam M. Prevalence and risk factors of caregiver dependence among older adults in a Southeast Asian Population. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2016; 45(11):486–494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contribution of the NHES team, which consisted of Suwat Chariyalertsak, Faculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University; Pattapong Kessomboon, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University; Sawitri Assanangkornchai, Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University; Surasak Taneepanichskul, College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University; and Nareemarn Neelapaichit, Ramathibodi School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. We also thank Angkana Jongsawadipatana for the data preparation.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Uppsala University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

    Chalobol Chalermsri, Syed Moshfiqur Rahman, Eva-Charlotte Ekström & Shirin Ziaei

  2. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Chalobol Chalermsri & Weerasak Muangpaisan

  3. Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Wichai Aekplakorn

  4. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Warapone Satheannopakao

Authors
  1. Chalobol Chalermsri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Syed Moshfiqur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eva-Charlotte Ekström
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weerasak Muangpaisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wichai Aekplakorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Warapone Satheannopakao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shirin Ziaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CC, SZ, E-CE, SMR, WA, WS and WM: Conceptualization and methodology. WA and WS: the data collection. CC and SZ: Analysis of the data. CC and SZ: Drafting and editing of the paper. CC, SZ, E-CE, SMR, WA, WS and WM: reviewing the paper. All authors read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chalobol Chalermsri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The initial study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Thai Ministry of Health and Mahidol University [25]. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Verbal consent was witnessed and formally recorded. Participation was voluntary, and the participants were told that they could leave the interview at any time. The current study was further approved by the ethics committee for Research in Human Subjects, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand (COA Si 076- 2021).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chalermsri, C., Rahman, S., Ekström, EC. et al. Socio-demographic characteristics associated with the dietary diversity of Thai community-dwelling older people: results from the national health examination survey. BMC Public Health 22, 377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12793-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12793-x

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us