Skip to main content

Resilience and self-harm among left-behind children in Yunnan, China: a community-based survey

Abstract

Background

Self-harm (SH) behaviors are established risk factors of suicide, however, in Chinese left-behind children (LBC), SH remains severely under-discussed. In this study, we aimed to investigate SH and explore its association between resilience in a large group of LBC.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study of 2898 LBC was conducted in Yunnan province, China. Information was collected by self-reporting questionnaires. Descriptive analysis was used to depict and compare characteristics of the subjects. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to estimate the associations between resilience and SH prevalence, SH severity, SH repetition.

Results

The prevalence of SH in LBC was 48.8% (95%CI: 47.0–49.7%). Compared to LBC with lower level of resilience, a higher level of resilience was related to 0.40 folds of SH odds (95%CI: 0.34–0.48). Besides, among all dimensions of resilience, every 1 average score increase of emotion regulation and family support were associated with 0.13 (95%CI: 0.04–0.37) and 0.14 (95%CI: 0.04–0.47) folds of odds in severer SH, respectively; one unit increase in the average score of emotion regulation was related to an OR of 0.23 (95%CI: 0.07–0.71) for repeated SH.

Conclusions

Psychological resilience presented protective effect on SH in LBC, especially the dimensions of emotion regulation and family support. Intervention measures focusing on enhancing emotion regulation ability and building parent-child connection could be considered in order to reduce SH and suicidal risk in LBC.

Peer Review reports

Background

With the widening rural-urban split exacerbated by economical prosperity and urbanization in the last four decades in China, increasing flow of rural labors into big cities for job opportunities has generated an expanding population known as the left-behind children (LBC), which indicates to children been left at home by one or both of their migrated parents [1, 2]. According to the released data in 2013 by All China Women’s Federation, the number of LBC had climbed to a staggering 61 million, accounted for 37.7% of the rural children and 21.9% of the total Chinese children [3, 4]. The overwhelmingly majority of LBC are from inland destitute areas, which made LBC a socioeconomically deprived population. Moreover, compared to non-left-behind children (NLBC), the long separation from parents will put LBC into an even more vulnerable situation. Therefore, in recent years, concerns regarding to the health status of LBC have been accumulated [5,6,7].

Self-harm (SH) refers to the behaviors that individual adopted to hurt oneself regardless of the intention [8]. It can occur at any age but reportedly more common in pubertal phase [9]. In China, a multi-center study based on a sample of 11,880 adolescents reported a SH prevalence of 30.3% [10]. Individual, familial, and social environmental determinants may collectively contribute to the increased SH in adolescents, and among them, it has been suggested that living in structurally or functionally abnormal family was associated with increased risk of SH [11]. Therefore, it is reasonable to suspect that, SH incidence of LBC will be significantly higher than NLBC. In fact, two previous cross-sectional studies published in Chinese have preliminarily investigated this issue with supportive evidence [12, 13]. Existing studies highlight the importance of SH in suicide, as it has been estimated that approximately 50–60% of suicidal deaths were coupled with a history of SH, and SH adolescents reported threefold risk of suicidal ideation (SI) compared with their non-SH counterparts [14, 15]. A recently published study found that, the one-year prevalence of suicide attempt in Chinese LBC was 3.75%, significantly higher than which in NLBC (2.86%) [16]. Therefore, it is of great importance to investigate SH and its influencing factors in Chinese LBC, so as to effectively reduce future suicidal risk in this vulnerable population. However, up till now, this topic remains severely under-discussed.

In the field of psychology, resilience is described as a competence of individual to successfully pull through adversity or trauma [17]. A newly published meta-analysis revealed a lower resilience level of Chinese LBC than NLBC [18]. Western literature reported that resilience was significantly associated with SH: SH individuals were generally observed lower level of resilience [19]. With this regard, resilience building might be a promising method to alleviate SH frequency and severity among LBC. It is also practical, for empirical evidence has suggested that individual resilience can be drastically reinforced by psychological or psychosocial intervention measures [20]. Nevertheless, this possible protective role of resilience in SH has never been explored in Chinese LBC.

Aiming at the deficiencies in current literature mentioned above, we intended to intensively analyze the association between resilience and SH in a large community-based sample of Chinese LBC. We hypothesized that, resilience is inversely associated with SH prevalence, SH severity, and SH repetition.

Methods

Study population and procedure

After the Ethics Review Board of Kunming Medical University approved, we performed a cross-sectional survey in Guangnan, a county affiliated to Wenshan Zhuang and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, home to the largest number of LBC among ethnical minority prefectures in Yunnan province, China. The survey was performed from June 26 to July 6, 2018. A one-stage random cluster sampling was applied: 1) Three townships were randomly chosen from a total of 18 rural townships in Guangnan; 2) All eligible LBC within the chosen townships were preliminarily included. We then used the following inclusion criteria to further screen study subjects: 1) One or both of their parents had been migrated for at least 6 months in the most recent year; 2) Aged between 10 and 17 years; 3) Resided in survey sites for at least six months per year. Children or adolescents were further excluded if they were: 1) Illiterate; 2) Delirious or suffering from severe psychiatric disorder with incompetence in expression; 3) Hearing or speech dysfunction; 4) Critically ill or under inconvenient conditions; 5) Refuse to participate.

Sample size. We chose a conservative estimation of 20% for SH prevalence based on published literature. The acceptable error rate and statistical significance level were set as 3% and 0.05, respectively. By using the formula for simple random sampling (\( N=\frac{{Z^2}_{2/\alpha}\pi \left(1-\pi \right)}{\delta^2} \)), we calculated a preliminary sample size of 712. Given the possible advent of refusal, an adjusted sample size was obtained on the premise of 80% effective response rate (N = 712/0.8 = 890). Considering that the sampling error of cluster sampling is inevitably bigger that simple random sampling, a design effect of 2 was applied to further adjust the required sample size, therefore, the final calculated sample size was N = 890 × 2 = 1780.

Measurements. Face-to-face interview was applied to collect information from study subjects by paper-and-pencil approach. Interviewers were qualified senior class undergraduates or graduates majoring in clinical medicine or public health from Kunming medical university. Before survey, all interviewers accepted a one-day intensive training and passed the subsequent examination. Prior to interview, a written consent was obtained from either the parent or legal guardian or teacher of the participant, as appropriate to the specific situation. The instrument we used contains 5 parts, which measure general characteristics, SH behaviors, psychological resilience, depressive symptoms (measured by the Chinese Version of Children’s Depression Inventory), and SI (measured by the Chinese Version of Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation) of LBC, respectively. The current study only used variables from the first three parts.

Self-harm. Self-harm was measured by using the Modified version of Adolescents Self-Harm Scale (MASHS) developed by Feng [21]. MASHS measures both the lifetime frequency and severity of the 18 most commonly reported SH behaviors among Chinese adolescents. Frequency of SH was measured by scaled options: never, once, two to four times, five times and above. SH severity was divided into 5 levels: non-observable injury, slight injury (observable but no need to treat), medium injury (requires simple treatment, no need to visit medical facilities), severe injury (requires treatment in medical facilities, no need to be hospitalized), critical injury (requires urgent treatment in emergency room and the subsequent hospitalization). The Cronbach’s α of MASHS in this sample was 0.75, indicates an acceptable level of internal consistency.

Resilience. We adopted the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents (RSCA) designed by Hu and Gan [22]. The respondents were expected to answer the degree of pertinence of the 27 items based on their own situation. Answers were rated by a five-point Likert scale: totally disagree (1 point), disagree (2 points), not sure (3 points), agree (4 points), and totally agree (5 points). The combined score of RSCA ranges from 27 to 135, with a higher sum indicates a better resilience level. The Cronbach’s α of RSCA in our study was 0.77. Based on exploratory factor analysis of the designer, the 27 items of RSCA can be grouped into 5 dimensions: goal concentration, emotion regulation, positive perception, family support, and interpersonal assistance.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to depict general characteristics of LBC. The categorical variables were presented with frequencies and proportions while the continuous variables were described by means and standard deviations (SDs). We dichotomized study subjects into two subgroups based on the presence of any SH behavior collected by MASHS. Univariate logistic regression model with a less strict significance level of p < 0.1 was adopted to screen for possible associated factors of SH. Multivariate logistic regression model was latter applied to estimate the adjusted associations between identified factors and SH. Finally, we performed a subgroup analysis only in self-harmed LBC: they were dichotomized by using SH severity (the presence of medium to severe SH) and SH repetition (the presence of more than once SH) separately, associated factors of SH severity and repetition were also analyzed by using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Statistical significance threshold of p value was set at no more than 0.05, two-tailed.

Results

General characteristics of participants

By applying inclusion and exclusion criteria mentioned above, altogether 3011 LBC were initially determined. Among them, 28 declined to participate, 10 were latter confirmed over-aged (≥18 years), and 75 were further deleted because of missing information in critical items, which left 2898 subjects for further analysis. The valid response rate was 96.6%. The major characteristics of study subjects were listed in Table 1: the mean age was 14.4 years with a SD of 1.81. Middle school students took the predominant majority (N = 1622, 55.97%). A total of 1413 LBC reported engaged in at least one episode of SH, with a lifetime prevalence of 48.80% (95%CI: 47.00–49.70%); slight injury was the commonest type of reported SH (N = 1037; 73.39%). In self-harmed LBC, 1017 (71.97%) reported repetitive SH. The overall score of psychological resilience and its SD were 94.42 and 12.85, respectively. Based on the median RSCA score, subjects were dichotomized as low resilience group (RSCA≤94) and high resilience group (RSCA> 94). The average scores of the five specific dimensions of resilience varied, ranging from 3.15 ± 0.78 (emotion regulation) to 3.77 ± 0.73 (goal concentration).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of 2898 LBC analyzed

Associated factors of SH

As shown in Table 2, variables with p values less than 0.10 in univariate analysis were: gender, grade, father’s age, mother’s age, father’s education level, and resilience. After multivariate adjustment, the association between resilience and SH stayed statistically prominent: compared to LBC with lower resilience level (RSCA< 94), a higher resilience level (RSCA≥40) was related to 0.40 folds of SH odds (95%CI: 0.34–0.48). We fitted multivariate logistic regression models which included the 5 specific dimensions of RSCA instead of the combined scores separately, and the results revealed that: except for positive perception, all the other four dimensions were significantly inversely associated with SH. Among the four dimensions, emotion regulation showed the strongest association: every 1 average score increase was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.03 (95%CI: 0.01–0.06) in SH.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses for self-harm behaviors in all left-behind children

Resilience with SH severity and repetition

We further discussed the possible influence of dimensions of resilience on SH severity and repetition in self-harmed LBC. By taking SH severity as the dependent, after adjusted for other possible influencing covariates, only emotion regulation and family support were statistically inversely associated with SH severity: every 1 average score increase of the two dimensions were associated with 0.13 (95%CI: 0.04–0.37) and 0.14 (95%CI: 0.04–0.47) folds of odds in medium or above injuries (Fig. 1, panel a).

Fig. 1
figure1

Adjusted odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals of SH severity and repetition for every 1 average score increase in dimensions of resilience. a Resilience with SH severity: event was defined as medium or above injury, adjusted for gender and grade; b Resilience with SH repetition: event was defined as more than once previous SH behaviors, adjusted for gender, grade and mother’s educational level

By using the same analytical strategy, for 5 dimensions of resilience, only emotion regulation was prominent factor of SH repetition: one unit increase in the average score was related to an OR of 0.23 (95%CI: 0.07–0.71) for repeated SH (Fig. 1, panel b).

Discussion

In the current study, we thoroughly discussed the association between SH and resilience in a large group of Chinese LBC, an interesting and important topic that has never been adequately addressed. Based on analytical results, we found that, SH is an urgent challenge in LBC, as a hefty 48.8% of self-reported SH prevalence has been revealed, much higher than which in other regions of China [23,24,25]. Besides, much in accordance with our anticipation, although the strengths and patterns of the associations varied, resilience was in general inversely associated with prevalence, severity, and repetition of SH behaviors.

The positive association between resilience and SH prevalence coincides with prior findings that higher levels of resilience potentially favored SH protection amid Chinese adolescents [26, 27], and non-SH adolescents tend to be more resilient than self-injurers [19]. The adolescent resilience model proposed by Haase [28] reckoned that, by gaining resources from individual, family and society, resilience renders people more prone to obtain resilience-related self-esteem, confidence and life satisfaction. The integrated model of self-injury by Nock [29] emphasized the combined effect of peers, family, schools and society in triggering the advent of self-injury. Therefore, one possible explanation could be that, more resilient individuals enjoy an advantage in multiple resources, which may predispose them to a lowered risk of SH. Additionally, resilience was believed to be a moderator between negative life events and mental health problems [30], and the latter were established risk factors of SH behaviors [31]. With this regard, LBC presented with higher resilience may less likely to be plagued by mental health problems like depression, which in turn, curtails the presence of SH.

Further analysis revealed that, among the five dimensions of resilience, emotion regulation was consistently associated with SH prevalence, severity, and repetition. Among general adolescents, emotion regulation was deemed plays a crucial role in depression and anxiety, as it has been suggested that the unsatisfactory emotion regulation was related to reduced capability in dealing with emotional challenges [32, 33]. In view of the intimate relationship between affective disorders, typically depression and anxiety, and SH behaviors in youngsters [34, 35], one possible explanation could be that, good emotion regulation dissuades self-mutilations engagement. The affect regulation model explains that, self-injury can occur with the purpose of keeping strong negative feelings regulatory [36]. Hence, the lack of emotion regulation ability may relate to susceptibility of immersing in negative mood, and consequently, the adoption of SH behaviors.

Another important finding was that, children with less perceived family support had higher incidence and severer SH behaviors, which was in agreement with several previous studies [37,38,39]. We found no such association existed in SH repetition, which was discrepant with the findings of Wang et al. [7]. However, different measurements of family support were used. Less intimacy and lower communication frequency between LBC and their migrated parents can increase the likelihood of encountering more loneliness and depression [40, 41]. In LBC, it has been reported that parent-child attachment negatively related to loneliness [40], and longitudinal evidence indicated that this attachment ameliorated the depression of LBC subsequently [42]. Therefore, it is reasonable to hypothesize that family support confers protective effect against SH in LBC by reducing loneliness and depression. Nevertheless, this assumption should be further validated.

Our major findings are of important secular significance. First and foremost, the striking prevalence of SH in LBC highlights the importance and urgency of SH intervention for the government and communities to effectively prevent or reduce such hazardous behavior in this mentally disadvantageous population Besides, the role of psychological resilience should be stressed. This is also a feasible intervention direction, as existing evidence suggests that resilience could be effectively enhanced through various kinds of group-based counseling measures among teens [20, 43].

As aforementioned, when dissected, emotion regulation was the strongest indicator of SH severity and repetition among all 5 dimensions of resilience. One study published in Chinese has already disclosed promising results: intervention on emotion regulation was associated with reduced level of SH frequency in a small group of LBC chosen from a single rural middle school [44]. The approaches the authors adopted, such as the correction of erroneous perceptions on SH, challenging unreasonable faith, and relaxation training, are generally practicable in school or community based resilience intervention programs for LBC.

Moreover, parent-child relationship should also be strengthened. Timely and adequate face-to-face communication is the best way to cultivate intimacy between children and their parents. However, it is unrealistic for LBC. Therefore, other possible substitutes should be considered. Perhaps a higher contact frequency via multiple means of modern communication can be an expedient but ideal choice, such as telephone, instant text message, audio or video chat, etcetera, as some positive conclusions have been reached by empirical studies [45, 46]. Among all available and affordable choices, which communication method outperforms the rest will be an interesting topic to be discussed.

The most important insight of our findings is that, not only the multidimensional nature of psychological resilience should be considered, the characteristics of SH is of identical importance to think about. Intervention measures that focus on different dimensions of resilience in combination of severity and repetition of SH may be the most effective: for LBC engaged in repeated SH, emotion regulation ability building should be stressed, whereas for LBC adopted severer SH behaviors, measures on parent-child relationship improvement could be simultaneously involved.

In this community-based study, we exhaustively discussed the association between resilience and SH with meaningful results. The reliability and validity of our findings can be substantially consolidated by representative sampling strategy and expanded sample size. Nevertheless, several limitations should be noticed. First, this is a cross-sectional study, which means that the causal inference cannot be reached. Second, information bias could exist for all information was collected by self-reporting. Finally, the study subjects were chosen from a single location in west China, thus discretion is needed in extrapolating the status of the whole Chinese LBC population based on our observations. Future studies with representative large sample and prospective design are warranted to further corroborate our findings. Besides, the underlying mechanism behind resilience-SH association should also be investigated.

Conclusions

SH prevalence is high among Chinese LBC and resilience may serve as a protective factor. Among the five dimensions of resilience, emotion regulation was the strongest associated factor of SH, and it also consistently correlated with SH severity and repetition. Besides, family support played a significant role in SH severity of LBC. These findings highlight the urgency of intervention aims at reinforcing emotion regulation and strengthening parent-child intimacy among this vulnerable population.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LBC:

left-behind children

MASHS:

the Modified version of Adolescents Self-Harm Scale

NLBC:

non-left-behind children

RSCA:

the Resilience Scale for Chinese Adolescents

SD:

standard deviation

SH:

Self-harm

SI:

suicidal ideation

References

  1. 1.

    Hu X, Cook S, Salazar MA. Internal migration and health in China. Lancet. 2008;372:1717–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Gao Y, Li LP, Kim JH, Congdon N, Lau J, Griffiths S. The impact of parental migration on health status and health behaviours among left behind adolescents school children in China. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    All-China Women's Federation. Research report on the situation of left-behind children in rural China (excerpt). Chinese Women’s Movement. 2008;6:35–7. (In Chinese).

  4. 4.

    All-China Women's Federation. A research report on the situation of rural left-behind children and migrant children in China. Chinese Women’s Movement. 2013;6:30–4. (In Chinese).

  5. 5.

    Liang Y, Wang L, Rui G. Depression among left-behind children in China. J Health Psychol. 2017;22:1897–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dai Q, Chu RX. Anxiety, happiness and self-esteem of western Chinese left-behind children. Child Abuse Negl. 2018;86:403–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wang Y, Zhang M, Chen H. Self-injury among left-behind adolescents in rural China: the role of parental migration and parent-child attachment. Front Psychol. 2019;7:2672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nock NK, Joiner TE, Gordon KH, Lloyd-Richardson E, Prinstein MJ. Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts. Psychiatry Res. 2016;144:65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fliege H, Lee JR, Grimm A, Klapp BF. Risk factors and correlates of deliberate self-harm behavior: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2009;56:617–26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xin X, Wang Y, Fang J, Ming Q, Yao S. Prevalence and correlates of direct self-injurious behavior among Chinese adolescents: findings from a multicenter and multistage survey. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017;45:815–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sourander A, Aromaa M, Pihlakoski L, Haavisto A, Rautava P, Helenius H, et al. Early predictors of deliberate self-harm among adolescents. A prospective follow-up study from age 3 to age 15. J Affect Disord. 2006;93:87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Xu Y, Ma L. A discussion on characteristics and causes of self-harm in rural left-behind teenagers: based on the survey in Macheng, Hubei province. J South Central Univ for Nationalities (Humanit Soc Sci Ed). 2013;33:90–6. (In Chinese).

  13. 13.

    Kong X, Liu Y, Zhao Q, Yuan L, Luo L. A study on the association between feeling of separation and self-harm in rural left-behind junior school students. Sci Technol West China. 2014;13:124–5. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Foster T, Gillespie K, McClellad R. Mental disorders and suicide in Northern Ireland. Br J Psychiatry. 1997;170:447–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Whitlock J, Muehlenkamp J, Eckenrode J, Purington A, Baral Abrams G, Barreira P, et al. Nonsuicidal self-injury as a gateway to suicide in young adults. J Adolescents Health. 2013;52:486–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chang H, Yan Q, Tang L, Huang J, Ma Y, Ye X, et al. A comparative analysis of suicide attempts in left-behind children and non-left-behind children in rural China. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Luthar SS. Resilience and vulnerability: adaptation in the context of childhood adversities: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

  18. 18.

    Dong B, Yu D, Ren Q, Zhao D, Li J, Sun YH. The resilience status of Chinese left-behind children in rural areas: a meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Huang L, Mossige S. Resilience in young people living with violence and self-harm: evidence from a Norwegian national youth survey. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2015;8:231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dray J, Bowman J, Freund M, Campbell E, Wolfenden L, Hodder RK, et al. Improving adolescent mental health and resilience through a resilience-based intervention in schools: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014;15:289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Feng Y. The relation of adolescents’ self-harm behaviors, Individual Emotion Characteristics and Family Environment Factors. Central China Norm Univ. 2008. (In Chinese).

  22. 22.

    Hu Y, Gan Y. Development and psychometric validity of the resilience scale for Chinese adolescents. Acta Psychol Sin. 2008;40:902–12. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Greydanus DE, Shek D. Deliberate self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Keio J Med. 2009;58:144–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang Y, Zhu X, Yi J, Yao S, Cai L, Bai M, et al. Self-harm and suicide behaviors in middle school students. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2012;20:666–8. (In Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Portzky G, De Wilde EJ, Van Heeringen K. Deliberate self-harm in young people: differences in prevalence and risk factors between the Netherlands and Belgium. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;17:179–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ma Y. Investigation of non-suicidal self-injury and influencing factors among rural middle school students. Huazhong Technological Uni. 2016; (In Chinese)

  27. 27.

    Yang X, Cui Z, Zhao J, Zhao J. The relationship between psychological and resilience, psychopathology and suicidal risks in Chinese college students. Chin J Health Psychol. 2013;9:1408–13. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Haase JE. The adolescents resilience model as a guide to interventions. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2004;21:289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nock MK, Prinstein MJ. A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004;72:885–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peng L, Zhang J, Li M, Li P, Zhang Y, Zuo X, et al. Negative life events and mental health of Chinese medical students: the effect of resilience, personality and social support. Psychiatry Res. 2012;196:138–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hawton K, Saunders KE, O'Connor RC. Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. Lancet. 2012;379:2373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schafer JO, Naumann E, Holmes EA, Tuschen-Caffier B, Samson AC. Emotion regulation strategies in depressive and anxiety symptoms in youth: a meta-analytic review. J Youth Adolesc. 2017;46:261–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    McLaughlin KA, Hatzenbuehler ML, Mennin DS, Nolen-Hoeksema S. Emotion dysregulation and adolescent psychopathology: a prospective study. Behav Res and Ther. 2011;49:544–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Zubrick SR, Hafekost J, Johnson SE, Sawyer MG, Patton G, Lawrence D. The continuity and duration of depression and its relationship to non-suicidal self-harm and suicidal ideation and behavior in adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2017;220:49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Viana AG, Dixon LJ, Berenz EC, Espil FM. Trauma and deliberate self-harm among inpatient adolescents: the moderating role of anxiety sensitivity. Psychol Trauma. 2017;9:509–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Messer JM, Fremouw WJ. A critical review of explanatory models for self-mutilating behaviors in adolescentss. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28:162–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xu Z, Su H, Wu J, Chang W, Sun Y. Self-injurious behavior among rural stay-at-home middle school students and its relationship with internal and external locus of control. Chin J Public Health. 2010;26:868–9. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wan Y, Chen J, Sun Y, Hu C, Tao F. Relationship between parent-child attachment and deliberate self-harm behaviors in middle school students. Chin J Child Health Care. 2013;21:1239–42. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Claes L, Raedt RD, Walle MVD, Bosmans G. Attentional bias moderates the link between attachment-related expectations and nonsuicidal self-injury. Cogn Ther Res. 2016;40:540–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ai H, Hu J. Psychological resilience moderates the impact of social support on loneliness of "left-behind" children. J Health Psychol. 2014;21:1066–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Guo J, Ren X, Wang X, Qu Z, Zhou Q, Ran C, et al. Depression among migrant and left-behind children in China in relation to the quality of parent-child and teacher-child relationships. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wu YL, Zhao X, Ding XX, Yang HY, Qian ZZ, Feng F, et al. A prospective study of psychological resilience and depression among left-behind children in China. J Health Psychol. 2017;22:627–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dray J, Bowman J, Campbell E, Freund M, Hodder R, Wolfenden L, et al. Effectiveness of a pragmatic school-based universal intervention targeting student resilience protective factors in reducing mental health problems in adolescents. J Adolesc. 2017;57:74–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Li J. Intervention of group counseling based on emotion management in adolescent non-suicidal self-injury. Hunan Norm Univ. 2016; (In Chinese)

  45. 45.

    Su S, Li X, Lin D, Xu X, Zhu M. Psychological adjustment among left-behind children in rural China: the role of parental migration and parent-child communication. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39:162–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wang L, Feng Z, Yang G, Yang Y, Dai Q, Hu C, et al. The epidemiological characteristics of depressive symptoms in the left-behind children and adolescents of Chongqing in China. J Affect Disord. 2015;177:36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Funding

The study is supported by Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects-Kunming Medical University Union Foundation (No. 2018FE001(− 132)), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81703324), China Scholarship Council (No. 201808535098). The funders played no roles in study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YX and XT designed the study. YX, WC, QM, and YC carried out data collection, XT and YX performed data analysis, XT prepared the draft manuscript, YX critically revised the manuscript, YC, ZY and LH contributed to study design and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanyuan Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of Kunming Medical University. In addition, a written consent was obtained from either the parent or legal guardian. For boarding students, upon the approval of the ethics review board, written consents were obtained from teachers. All participated students aged 16 or above also provided written consents to participate by themselves.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, X., Chang, W., Meng, Q. et al. Resilience and self-harm among left-behind children in Yunnan, China: a community-based survey. BMC Public Health 19, 1728 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8075-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Left-behind children
  • Self-harm
  • Resilience
  • Emotion regulation
  • Family support