Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The Vital@Work Study. The systematic development of a lifestyle intervention to improve older workers' vitality and the design of a randomised controlled trial evaluating this intervention

  • Jorien E Strijk1,
  • Karin I Proper1, 2Email author,
  • Allard J van der Beek1, 2 and
  • Willem van Mechelen1, 2
BMC Public Health20099:408

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-408

Received: 28 September 2009

Accepted: 10 November 2009

Published: 10 November 2009

Abstract

Background

A major contributor of early exit from work is a decline in health with increasing age. As healthy lifestyle choices contribute to better health outcomes, an intervention aimed at an improved lifestyle is considered a potentially effective tool to keep older workers healthy and vital, and thereby to prolong labour participation.

Methods

Using the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol, a lifestyle intervention was developed based on information obtained from 1) literature, 2) a short lifestyle questionnaire aimed at indentifying the lifestyle behaviours among the target group, and 3) focusgroup (FG) interviews among 36 older workers (aged 45+ years) aimed at identifying: a) key determinants of lifestyle behaviour, b) a definition of vitality, and c) ideas about how vitality can be improved by lifestyle.

The main lifestyle problems identified were: insufficient levels of physical activity and insufficient intake of fruit and vegetables. Using information from both literature and FG interviews, vitality consists of a mental and a physical component. The interviewees suggested to improve the mental component of vitality by means of relaxation exercises (e.g. yoga); physical vitality could be improved by aerobic endurance exercise and strength training.

The lifestyle intervention (6 months) consists of three visits to a Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) combined with a Vitality Exercise Programme (VEP). The VEP consists of: 1) once a week a guided yoga group session aimed at relaxation exercises, 2) once a week a guided aerobic workout group session aimed at improving aerobic fitness and increasing muscle strength, and 3) older workers will be asked to perform once a week for at least 45 minutes vigorous physical activity without face-to-face instructions (e.g. fitness). Moreover, free fruit will be offered at the group sessions of the VEP. The lifestyle intervention will be evaluated in a RCT among older workers of two major academic hospitals in the Netherlands. At baseline, after 6 and 12 months, measurements (primary: lifestyle and vitality, and secondary: work-engagement and productivity) will take place.

Discussion

The lifestyle programme is developed specifically tailored to the needs of the older workers and which is aimed at improving their vitality.

Trial registration

NTR1240

Background

One of the most notable current and near future changes in the working population is its ageing. The baby boom cohort will start retiring in the coming decade. At the same time, fewer young people will enter the labour market due to lower birth rates in the past few decades [1]. These demographic changes will cause a shift in the ratio of workers-retirees, leading to a relative shortage of active labour force. As a consequence, a shrinking number of economically active people (i.e. workers) will have to pay for the national pensions of an increasing number of retired persons. In addition, many older people leave their job earlier than the official age of retirement [2]. To overcome these consequences, there is a need to find means for prolonging healthy labour participation of older workers. One of the major contributors to early exit from work is a decline in health [36]. Therefore, interventions aimed at the promotion of health may increase labour participation of older workers.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has described health as "a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity" (WHO 1948). Despite lack of a sound documentation, it is assumed that vitality is closely related to this definition of health. Since it is no longer under debate that healthy lifestyle choices contribute to better health outcomes, an intervention aimed at improving lifestyle is considered as a potentially effective tool to keep older workers healthy and vital and thereby to contribute to prolonged employability. To date, no such lifestyle intervention exists.

The aim of the Vital@Work study is twofold, namely 1) to develop a lifestyle intervention to keep older workers vital, and 2) to scientifically evaluate the developed intervention. Consequently, this paper first describes the development and implementation of the lifestyle intervention, following the structure given by the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol. Second, the design of the (cost-) effectiveness study evaluating the lifestyle intervention is described.

Methods

The systematic development of the lifestyle intervention

The lifestyle intervention was developed using the Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol, which is a stepwise process for theory- and evidence-based development of a health promotion intervention (figure 1) [7]. IM is not a theoretical or conceptual framework, but rather a description of a logical planning process. It consists of six steps: 1) the needs assessment; 2) the definition of programme objectives, 3) the selection of adequate theories and methods, 4) the design of the intervention program, 5) the development of a plan for the adoption and implementation, and 6) the development of a evaluation plan.
Figure 1

The Intervention Mapping Process. Source: Bartholomew et al. (2001).

Step 1 - Needs assessment

The lifestyle behaviours and associated health and vitality problems among older workers, were assessed by a thorough literature search as well as by information obtained from a short lifestyle questionnaire and focus group interviews. The needs assessment further gained insight into the definition of vitality and its association with lifestyle. The purpose of step 1 was to formulate the programme objectives of the lifestyle intervention.

Literature was searched to obtain information about older workers' lifestyle, the definition of vitality, and the association between lifestyle and vitality. A search for relevant scientific literature was conducted using MEDLINE. The key words used involved a combination of concepts regarding the study population (e.g. older workers, ageing workers, aging workers, older working population, middle aged), intervention (e.g. randomised controlled trial, evaluation, effect) and regarding the outcome measurements (e.g. vital, vitality, lifestyle, dietary habits, fruit intake, physical activity, relaxation). To obtain information about older workers' lifestyle, a random sample of 72 older workers (aged 45+) of a major Dutch academic hospital received, together with the invitation for the focusgroup interviews, a short lifestyle questionnaire. This questionnaire contained questions about physical activity, diet, and smoking. Participants were asked to return the questionnaire within a week. Completed questionnaires (n = 35) were analysed to gain insight into the main problems concerning the three lifestyle behaviours. Based on the lifestyle outcomes, semi-structured questions were formulated, specifically for the target group, to be discussed in the focus group interviews.

Older workers who completed the short lifestyle questionnaire received a confirmation for participation in a focusgroup interview. The aims of the focus group interviews were:
  1. 1)

    Identifying key determinants of the lifestyle behaviours,

     
  2. 2)

    Identifying ideas about the definition of vitality,

     
  3. 3)

    Identifying ideas about how vitality can be improved by a lifestyle intervention

     

Per aim, participants were asked to individually write down keywords on post-its (one keyword per post-it), without discussing their answers with other participants. Next, post-its were collected by the discussion leader. Underlying ideas of given answers (i.e. keywords) were further discussed during the focus group interview. In total, five focus group interviews with older workers (n = 32) were carried out.

Step 2 - Performance objectives

During this step of the IM process, the intervention was further tailored to the specific needs of the older workers. In addition, performance objectives were specified, which were based on the programme objectives identified during the needs assessment. Performance objectives are the effects of the intervention on the older workers in terms of what should be learned or which specific behaviour should be changed.

Step 3 - Theory-based methods and practical strategies

In step 3, theory-based methods and practical strategies that are likely to create the expected changes in the determinants were indentified. A method is a theory-based technique to influence change in determinants of behaviour or environmental conditions, whereas practical strategies are defined as techniques for the application of the theoretical methods. Methods and strategies were chosen based on the key determinants for the performance objectives, as selected in the needs assessment.

Step 4 - Design of the intervention

The next step of the IM process involved a description of the scope and sequence of the components of the lifestyle intervention. During the design of the intervention, primary aims of the lifestyle programme were formulated. Furthermore, methods and strategies selected in the previous step were translated into programme materials. Also, the intervention protocols were completed.

Step 5 - Adoption and implementation plan

The focus of step 5 is program adoption and the development of a plan for the implementation of the lifestyle programme. Facilitating factors and barriers regarding the adopting and implementation of the lifestyle programme were identified during the focus group interviews using semi-structured questions.

Step 6 - Evaluation plan

To assess the (cost)-effectiveness of the Vital@Work lifestyle programme, an evaluation plan was developed. The last step of the IM process describes the study design, study population, randomisation procedure, sample size, outcome measures, and statistical analysis.

The design of the Vital@Work study: results from the IM process

Step 1 - Needs assessment

The starting point of the needs assessment was the current and near future ageing of the working population. Ageing is characterised by an increased prevalence of various chronic diseases such as CVD and cancer, but also by musculoskeletal disorders. As presented in the Vital@Work model (figure 2), a decline in health is one of the major contributors of early exit from work [36]. One concept that is assumed to be closely related and therefore might influence health is vitality. As healthy lifestyle choices contribute to better health outcomes, lifestyle is considered to influence older workers' vitality.
Figure 2

The Vital@Work model, describing the Vital@Work intervention, aimed at improving lifestyle (physical activity, diet and relaxation), as a potentially effective tool to keep older workers vital and healthy and thereby contributing to prolonged employability.

Vitality

Despite lack of an unambiguous definition of vitality in the scientific literature, it can be concluded that vitality is a comprehensive and complex concept, which is commonly used as a blanket term consisting of several factors. For example, McNair et al. (1971) stated that vitality is "a mood of vigorousness and high energy" [8]. Ware & Sherbourne (1992) linked the concept of vitality to "one's energy level and fatigue" and indicated that vitality reflects general physical and mental well-being [9]. Ryan & Frederick (1997) described vitality as "a dynamic aspect of well-being, marked by subjective experience of energy and aliveness" [10]. In the specific field of occupational health, vitality has been described by Schaufeli & Bakker (2003) as one of the three dimensions of work engagement [11]. They characterised vitality by "high levels of energy, feeling strong and fit, mental resilience while working, the willingness to invest effort in one's work, and persistence even in the face of difficulties" [11, 12]. Considering the definitions mentioned above, it becomes clear that vitality consists of a mental as well as a physical component (figure 1). As to the mental component, vitality reflects well-being, less feelings of fatigue, mental resilience, and perseverance. With respect to the physical component, vitality is characterised by high energy levels and feeling "strong and fit". The physical component of vitality can, in fact, also be considered as part of the health-related fitness construct as described by Bouchard et al. (1994) consisting of aerobic fitness (VO2-max), muscular strength, flexibility, and body composition (BMI, body fat) [13, 14].

Similar findings according the definition of vitality, were found during the focus group interviews. The interviewees confirmed that vitality in their view consists of a mental and a physical component. According to the interviewees, the mental factors of vitality are characterised by mental health (absences of mental disorders, such as depression), well-being (e.g. being happy with yourself, being positive, being motivated), perseverance if difficulties occurs, and fatigue. The physical factors of vitality were, according to the interviewees, characterised by physical health (i.e. the absence of chronic diseases that interfere with daily life activities), feelings of energy, and having high levels of aerobic fitness.

Lifestyle & vitality

Lifestyle consists of several factors, including physical activity, food intake, relaxation, smoking, and alcohol intake. The effects of sufficient levels of physical activity on health are beyond doubt. Those with a physically active lifestyle are at decreased risk for various chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), some types of cancer, type 2 diabetes, and obesity [13, 1518]. In addition, physical activity favourably affects mental health, well-being, and feelings of fatigue [1922]. It has been shown that people who lead an active lifestyle for several years are at reduced risk for suffering symptoms of depression [22]. As described by Bouchard and colleagues (11), the positive effects of physical activity on health can be explained either through a direct relationship or an indirect one, namely through improved levels of health-related fitness (i.e. BMI, VO2-max, muscle strength). As to the indirect relationship, the physical activity level should be of at least vigorous intensity, and of a certain frequency and duration.

Next to physical activity, an unhealthy diet rich in saturated fat intake and a low intake in fruit and vegetables is associated with several chronic diseases, such as CVD and cancer [21, 23, 24]. In particular, fruit and vegetable consumption have shown to be associated with lower levels of blood pressure and a lower risk of hypertension [25].

Another lifestyle factor that has shown to be associated with a reduction in blood pressure is relaxation [26, 27]. There are also indications that relaxation leads to a reduction in coronary heart disease [26, 27]. Moreover, a six-month lasting relaxation exercise program (yoga) has proven to yield favourable effects on well-being, experienced energy levels, quality of life, perceived stress, anxiety, and fatigue [28].

As to smoking, many epidemiological studies have shown the negative health consequences, namely elevated risks for all-cause mortality, CVD, cancer, and respiratory diseases, such as COPD [2934].

Finally, the negative health outcomes for high alcohol consumption are all-cause mortality, and an increased risk for various diseases, such as CVD, stroke, diabetes, and liver disease [3538].

Problems concerning lifestyle

More than 60 percent of all Dutch adults do not achieve the recommended amount of physical activity (i.e. 5 days a week 30 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity, and 3 days a week 20 minutes of vigorous intensity physical activity) [18, 39]. In fact, 25 percent of all adults are not active at all [18].

Regarding fruit and vegetables, Dutch authorities have recommended intake levels of 200 g of vegetables and two pieces of fruit per day [40, 41]. Similar amounts are recommended in other Western countries [42]. However, many consumers do not meet these recommendations [43]. Estimated current smokers among adults are in the Netherlands is 29.6 percent, and in the US 19.6 percent [44, 45]. In contrast to the general population, no detailed information about older workers' unhealthy lifestyle could be indentified in the scientific literature. However, based on the lifestyle questionnaire pilot data (n = 35) two main problems concerning older workers' lifestyle were identified: the older workers' had insufficient levels of physical activity and they did not eat the daily recommended amount of fruit.

Improving vitality by a lifestyle intervention

To gain insight into the thoughts of older workers about how vitality can be improved by a lifestyle intervention, a distinction was made during the focus group interviews for an intervention focussed at the mental and at the physical factors of vitality. According to the interviewees, mental factors of vitality can be improved by activities that are aimed at relaxation. Most frequently mentioned ideas for improving mental vitality were participation in lessons of yoga, Tai Chi, and meditation. Further, interviewees reported the wish to learn performing those relaxation exercises at the workplace. The interviewees indicated that the physical factors of vitality can be improved by physical activities aimed at improving aerobic fitness. Interventions focussed at improving physical vitality mentioned frequently included fitness (both fitness exercise classes and individually), walking, and cycling. Based on scientific literature and expertise, physical activity levels should be of at least vigorous intensity to obtain improved aerobic fitness levels [13, 46]. Since muscle strengths is, besides improving aerobic fitness levels, also associated with improved health outcomes such as reduced risk of cardiac vascular diseases (CVD) and muscoskeletal diseases, there should also be a focus on improving muscle strengths [47, 48].

Also, the content and way of delivering of the intervention were specified by the older workers during the focus group interviews. Older workers mentioned their preferences about the timing: training sessions should be offered around working hours (lunchtime and after working hours), two times a week, and should last about 30-40 minutes. They further preferred guided small group lessons for social interaction, as well as for coaching about how to perform exercises without getting injured. Besides a group-based approach, an individual approach was desired for providing physical activity and dietary advice. Another condition that was mentioned was flexibility: not having obligations towards others, flexible times, and having the possibility to chose different kinds of physical activities.

Ideas mentioned by the older workers about how vitality can be improved by eating more fruit were offering free fruit and by taking a daily fruit break at a settled time.

Programme objectives

Based on the needs assessment, programme objectives were defined. These provide the foundation for the intervention by specifying who and what will change as a result of the lifestyle intervention.

The formulated programme objectives for the Vital@Work lifestyle intervention were:
  1. 1)

    Older workers will improve mental factors of vitality by relaxation exercises

     
  2. 2)

    Older workers will improve physical factors of vitality by vigorous intensity physical activity, i.e. by training

     
  3. 3)

    Older workers will improve their dietary habits by increasing daily intake of fruit

     

Step 2 - Performance objectives

The performance objectives formulated for the Vital@Work lifestyle intervention are presented in table 1.
Table 1

Performance objectives for the programme objectives formulated for the Vital@Work lifestyle intervention

Program objective

Performance objective

Older workers improve the mental factors of vitality by relaxation exercises

1. Older workers follow once a week a guided group lesson aimed at relaxation exercises

 

2. Older workers monitor their weekly performed relaxation exercises

 

3. Older workers are able to perform relaxation exercise on their own

Older workers improve the physical factors of vitality by vigorous intensity physical activity

4. Older workers follow once a week a guided group lesson aimed at vigorous intensity physical activity

 

5. Older workers monitor their weekly vigorous physical activities

 

6.Older workers identify barriers for not being vigorous physical active

 

7. Older workers are able to identify solutions for the recognized barriers for not being vigorous physical active

Older workers improve their dietary habits by increasing daily intakes of fruit

8. Older workers increase their daily intakes of fruit

 

9. Older workers monitor their weekly intake of fruit

Determinants of performance objectives

Based on the focus group interviews important and changeable determinants of the performance objectives were selected. The following determinants for physical activity (including both relaxation and vigorous intensity physical activity) were identified: intention, self-efficacy, attitude, habits, skills, awareness (of own physical activity level), and social support. The most important determinants of healthy dietary habits by eating daily a sufficient amount of fruit were: self-efficacy, attitude, habits, awareness, social norm, and intention.

Step 3 - Theory-based methods and practical strategy

Methods were selected in order to change the determinants selected for performance objectives formulated for the Vital@Work intervention. Selected methods were: guided practice, goal setting, environmental changes, decisional balance, (self) monitoring, and self-evaluation. Methods were translated into practical strategies in order to enable older workers to accomplish the performance objectives successfully. The methods and strategies for the first performance objective (older workers will improve mental factors of vitality by relaxation exercises) are presented in table 2. As an example, skills training (i.e. guided group sessions of yoga) were selected as a practical strategy to apply the method guided practice.
Table 2

Methods and strategies selected for improving older workers' mental factors of vitality by relaxation

Determinant

Methods from Theory

Strategy

Tools/materials

Skills: Learning exercises to relax

Guided practice

- Skills training

- Guided relaxation exercise sessions (Yoga)

Self-Efficacy

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Planning coping responses

- Individualized feedback

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) visits

- Discussion barriers/difficult situations, and possible solutions with PVC

- Feedback on formulated goals (e.g. attended group sessions)

 

Environmental changes

- Facilitation of healthy behaviour

- offering guided yoga session in the near environment of the workplace

Attitude

Decisional balance

- Knowledge

- Providing information (e.g. leaflet, PVC) of relaxation and its relation to health-related outcome (e.g. mental health, well-being)

Habits

Goal setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

Awareness

Self-evaluation

- Monitoring own relaxation behaviour

- Relaxation diary

Intention

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

Methods and strategies for the second performance objective (older workers will improve physical factors of vitality by vigorous intensity physical activity) are presented in table 3. As an example, formulating implementation intentions (i.e. a worksheet to help planning personal goals by specifying how and when) and individualised feedback (i.e. discussion barriers and difficult situations with the Personal Vitality Coach) were selected as a practical strategies to apply the method goal setting.
Table 3

Methods and strategies for improving physical factors of vitality by increasing vigorous intensity physical activity

Determinant

Methods from Theory

Strategy

Tools/materials

Skills: improving aerobic fitness

Guided practice

- Skills training

- Guided workout sessions exercise

Self-Efficacy

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Planning coping responses

- Individualized feedback

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) visits

- Discussing barriers/difficult situations, and possible solutions with PVC

- Feedback from PVC on formulated goals (e.g. attended group sessions)

 

Environmental changes

- Facilitation of healthy behaviour

- Offering workout sessions in the near environment of the workplace

Attitude

Decisional balance

- Knowledge

- Providing information (e.g. leaflet, PVC) regarding physical activity

Habits

Goal setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Rewarding

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

- Feedback from PVC on formulated goals

Awareness

Self-evaluation

- Monitoring of own physical activity

- Physical activity diary

Intention

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

Methods and strategies for the third performance objective (older workers will improve their dietary habits by increasing daily intake of fruit) are presented in table 4. As an example, monitoring own fruit intake (i.e. fruit diary) was selected for as a practical strategy to apply the method self-evaluation.
Table 4

Methods and strategies selected for improving dietary habits by increasing daily intakes of fruit

Determinant

Methods from Theory

Strategy

Tools/materials

Self-Efficacy

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Individualized feedback

- Planning coping responses

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) visits

- Discussion barriers/difficult situations, and possible solutions with PVC

 

Environmental changes

- Facilitation of healthy behaviour

- Providing free fruit at the Vitality Exercise Programme (VEP)

Attitude

Decisional balance

- Knowledge

- Providing information (e.g. leaflet, coach) regarding the behaviour and connection between behaviour and (health-related) outcome

Habits

Goal setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

Awareness

Self-evaluation

- Monitoring own fruit intake

- Fruit intake diary

Intention

Goal Setting

- Formulation of implementation intentions

- Discussing worksheet to help planning goals (How? When?) during PVC visits

Step 4 - design of the intervention

Based on the process of Intervention Mapping, the primary aims of the intervention are:
  1. 1)

    Improving older workers' mental factors of vitality by relaxation exercises;

     
  2. 2)

    Improving older workers' physical factors of vitality by vigorous intensity physical activity.

     

Additionally, the secondary aim of the intervention is to improve older workers' dietary habits by increasing intakes of fruit. The intervention will last 6 months and will consists of 1) three visits to a Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) combined with 2) the Vitality Exercise Programme (VEP), and 3) provided free fruit at the VEP.

Personal Vitality Coach (PVC) Visits

All participants will be invited to visit the PVC three times during 6 months. The first visit (30 minutes) will be at the start of the intervention, the follow-up visits (30 minutes) will be at 4-6 weeks and 10-12 weeks after the first PVC visit.

The coaching visits will be aimed at: 1) goal setting, 2) feedback on formulated goals (i.e. self-monitoring, self-evaluation), and 3) problem solving.

The Vitality Exercise Programme (VEP)
The VEP will be aimed at improving both mental and physical factors of vitality. Mental factors will be improved by yoga (relaxation exercises) and physical factors by a workout aimed at improving aerobic fitness and muscle strength. The VEP consist of:
  1. 1)

    a guided group session of yoga once a week,

     
  2. 2)

    a guided workout group session consisting of aerobic and resistance exercises once a week

     
  3. 3)

    aerobic exercising without direct face-to-face instruction. Attendance to this once a week additional session will be prescribed by the fitness instructor who guides the workout sessions, and by the PVC during the visits.

     
Yoga

Yoga will be guided by a qualified yoga instructor and will be provided once a week (in total 24 sessions during a intervention period of 6 months) in small group sessions (max. 16 persons) and consists of relaxation exercises. Each session will last 45 minutes and will start with relaxation and preparation postures for the hips, shoulders, neck, feed, and hands while focussing on breathing (5 minutes), followed by a series of standing postures, forward bending postures and twists, and light back bending postures (30 minutes). Each yoga session will be ended with an yoga exercise aimed at total relaxation, known as the 'Savasana Corpse Pose' and mediation (10 minutes).

Workout

The workout will be guided by a fitness instructor and will be provided once a week (in total 24 sessions during a intervention period of 6 months), and will be conducted in small group training sessions (max. 16 persons). Each session will last 45 minutes, and will start with a warming-up of 5 minutes followed by aerobic exercises (in total 2 × 10 minutes, 1 × 5 minutes = 25 minutes), resistance training (2 × 5 = 10 minutes), and a cooling-down (3 minutes).

Improvements in aerobic fitness (i.e. VO2-max) are directly related to the frequency, intensity, and duration of the activities. The intensity of the workout will meet the ACSM-guidelines, which recommends an intensity that equals 65-90% of the maximum heart rate (HRmax) [47, 49]. The resistance training will be progressive in nature and provides stimulus to all major muscle groups. The ACSM-guidelines recommend a repetition maximum (RM) of 10-15 repetitions of each exercise. The frequency of the resistance exercises was defined as 3 RM (3 × 10-15 repetitions). Each exercise will be performed with a load at which the repetition maximum can just be maintained [48].

Aerobic exercise without direct face-to-face instruction

Besides the yoga and workout sessions, older workers will be prescribed to perform once a week for at least 45 minutes of vigorous physical activity without face-to-face instructions (e.g. fitness, running, spinning). To achieve improvement in aerobic fitness, workers will be asked to exercise with an intensity similar to the guided workout sessions. As an illustration of this intensity, workers got the instruction to exercise with an intensity at which they become sweating and experienced increased respiration and heart beat.

Providing free fruit at the VEP

During the intervention period, free fruit will be provided at the guided yoga and workout group sessions of the VEP.

Step 5 - Adoption and implementation plan

Two main factors for adoption of the programme by the target population were identified, namely time and place. Therefore, the lifestyle programme was modified to fit within a common working day of the older workers by choosing adequate time schedules for the provided yoga and guided workout group sessions. Guided group sessions will be provided in two time blocks on all working days: 1) during lunchtime (3 sessions), and 2) after working hours (3 sessions). Furthermore, to increase the adoption of the lifestyle programme, the guided group sessions will be provided near the worksite (max. 5-10 minutes walk).

Step 6 - Evaluation plan

The (cost-) effectiveness of the lifestyle intervention developed in the preceding IM steps, will be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with two arms. During six months, employees in the intervention group will receive the lifestyle programme as described above. The control group will receive the same written information as the intervention group about a healthy lifestyle (physical activity, relaxation, fruit). Both groups will be measured at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months. The Medical Ethical Committee of both the VU University Medical Center (VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands) approved the study protocol.

Study population

The study population consists of older workers (aged 45 years and over) from the VUmc and LUMC, working at least 16 hours a week.

Recruitment of the study population

First, all potential participants will receive an invitation letter at their home postal address together with an information package consisting of: 1) flyer with information about the study, 2) informed consent, 3) screener for exclusion criteria: i.e. the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q), and 4) a stamped and addressed envelope for reply. Workers who are willing to participate in the study will be asked to return the signed informed consent together with the completed screener within a week. Subsequently, workers who meet the inclusion criteria and signed the informed consent will receive the baseline questionnaire together with an invitation for the UKK walk test at their home postal address. Workers who are not willing to participate in the study will be asked to give their reasons for not participating. Two weeks after the initial mailing, a postcard will be sent to thank respondents for returning their screener and informed consent. For non-respondents the back of this postcard will be used as a reminder and as a second opportunity to complete the screener and informed consent. To minimise non-response during the follow-up measurements, all participants will receive a pre-notice card a week before the measurement. Subsequently (i.e. within one week after the pre-notice card), all participants will receive the follow-up questionnaire and will receive an invitation for another UKK walk test.

Randomisation procedure

A computer-generated randomisation will be performed at individual level after baseline measurements are completed. Randomisation will be executed, after completing baseline measurements, by an independent researcher (i.e. research assistant) using Random Allocation Software (Version 1.0, May 2004, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran).

Power calculation

The sample size calculation will be based on differences between the intervention and control group with regard to changes in the mean vitality score, measured by the Utrecht Engagement Scale (UWES) (10). Based on a study among 10.000 Dutch and Belgian employees, the baseline mean vitality score (range 0-6) is assumed to be 3.99 (SD = 1.11) [12]. For the sample size needed, a difference in the vitality mean score of 10% between the intervention and control group after six months will be considered relevant. This means an average difference in the vitality mean score of 0.4 (SD 1.2) between both study groups. Assuming α = 0.05, power = 0.90, and two-sided tests, 189 participants per group will be needed. Taking into account a loss of follow-up of 15%, a sample size of 446 employees (223 employees in each group) needs to be included. Further, based on an initial response of 20% of the eligible workers (i.e. workers aged 45 and over), 2230 workers need to be approached and asked to participate in the study. In total, 3756 older workers of the two academic hospitals will be approached for participation, thereby ensuring sufficient statistical power, even in case of unexpectedly poor initial response and/or high loss to follow-up.

Measurements

All measurements will be completed at baseline, after 6, and 12 months. The measurements will consist of 1) a questionnaire, containing questions concerning lifestyle, vitality, general health, work and the health-related fitness construct Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference, combined with 2) the 2-km UKK walking test.

Lifestyle

The level of physical activity will be assessed using the validated Short Questionnaire to AssesS Health enhancing physical activity (SQUASH) [50]. The SQUASH measures duration, frequency and intensity of four clusters of physical activity, i.e. commuting activities, household activities, activity at work, and leisure time activities. The SQUASH has been shown to be a fairly reliable and reasonably valid questionnaire [50].

In addition, physical activity will be measured objectively in a random sample of 200 participants of both the intervention (n = 100) and control group (n = 100). This subsample will receive during a period of one week (7 days) an accelerometer (GTM1 ActiGraph, ActiTrainer ActiGraph), which registers the actual physical activity during daytime. To minimize both the intrainstrument variability (the difference within a single accelerometer over multiple follow-up measurements) and interinstrument variability (differences between different accelerometers during a single measurement), workers receive every follow-up measurement the same accelerometers. The accelerometers will be worn during waking hours on the right hip and will be handed out after completing the questionnaire. Fruit intake will be assessed using an adapted version of the validated Short Fruit and Vegetable questionnaire [51]. The questionnaire consists of 10 questions: 6 about fruit consumption and 4 about consumption of vegetables. In this study, only the questions about fruit will be asked.

Vitality

A 17-item questionnaire, called the Utrecht Engagement Scale (UWES), will be used to measure workers' work engagement. The UWES consists of three aspects: vitality (6 items), dedication (5 items), and absorption (6 items) [11, 12, 52].

Vitality will be assessed by the six items of the UWES that refer to high levels of energy and resilience, the willingness to invest effort, not being easily fatigued, and persistence in the face of difficulties.

Health-related fitness

BMI will be calculated using self-reported weight and height. All participants will be asked to report their self-measured waist circumference in each questionnaire. For that aim, a measuring tape (range 0-135 cm) will be sent to all participants along with the questionnaires. Participants will have instructions on how to use the measuring tape and are asked to report their waist circumference to the nearest cm. Besides BMI and waist circumference, the aerobic fitness (VO2-max) of the older workers will be measured using the UKK 2-km walking test. The optimal way of measuring VO2-max is by a maximal exercise test (i.e. treadmill test). However, for regular use in many research and clinical setting, this may be impractical. For simplicity, suitability and social acceptability walking is an attractive exercise mode for the purposes of mass testing [53]. Therefore, in this study the UKK walk test will be used to predict VO2-max. The UKK walk test is a simple and safe test designed to measure the aerobic fitness of normally active men and women [54]. The UKK walk test is a fast 2-km walk supplemented with simple measurements (heart rate, BMI) and has shown to be a feasible and accurate method for predicting VO2-max in healthy 20-65 year old subjects [55]. A gender-specific prediction model including walking time, heart rate at the end of the walk, age and body mass index predicted 73-75% of the variance in VO2-max [53].

General health

Information about whether or not suffering from any chronic diseases (e.g. cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, muscoskeletal disorders, diabetes mellitus) will be obtained using a 1-item question about chronic diseases from the Dutch Working Conditions Survey [56]. Mental health will be measured using the 5-item scale of the RAND-36. Besides mental health, other health-related quality of life items will be measured: physical functioning (PH, 10 items), role limitations caused by physical problems (RP, 4 items), general health perceptions (GH, 5 items), and vitality (VT, 4 items) [57].

Work-related outcomes

Sick leave will be determined using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (WHO-HPQ) measuring loss of productivity due to decreased performance while at work (presenteeism) and sick leave (absenteeism). This questionnaire has shown good concordance with employer records of work absenteeism and critical incidents [58, 59]. For the specific purpose of the economic evaluation, participants will be asked to complete the WHO-HPQ once every three months. Besides loss of productivity, the need for recovery after a working day will be measured using the 11-item 'need for recovery scale' from the Dutch version of the Questionnaire on the Experience and Evaluation of Work (Dutch abbreviation VBBA) [60].

Data analysis

Statistical analysis

The effectiveness of the lifestyle intervention will be analysed by means of a regression analysis (analysis of covariance) with the outcome measure at follow-up (6 months and 12 months) as the dependent variable and adjusting for the baseline levels of the outcome measure. Both crude and adjusted analyses will be performed. In the adjusted model, other potential confounders than covariates will be included, such as age, smoking and physical activity. Furthermore, effect modification, e.g. by gender, will be checked. All statistical analyses will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. For all analyses a two-tailed significance level of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Linear and logistic (longitudinal) regression analyses will be performed with SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Economic evaluation

A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be performed from the company perspective. The time horizon will be 12 months, similar to the trial. The analysis will be performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Missing data will be imputed using multiple imputation techniques. The primary outcome measurements in the CEA will be lifestyle (physical activity and daily fruit intake) and vitality (total score vitality scale UWES).

Two CEAs will be performed from the company perspective:
  1. 1)

    intervention costs together with savings as a result of reduced sick leave (absenteeism) and loss of productivity (presenteeism) will be compared to the obtained effects on the primary outcome measures lifestyle and vitality

     
  2. 2)

    intervention costs will be compared to the obtained benefits due to reduced sick leave and increased productivity.

     

Process evaluation

The process of the intervention will be evaluated according to the key process-relevant variables: recruitment, older workers' attitude towards the intervention, fidelity, reach, dose delivered, dose received, and implementation [61, 62]. The recruitment of the older workers is described elsewhere in this article (see 'recruitment of the study population'). The other key process-relevant variables will be assessed in four ways. First, at post-test the attitude towards the intervention will be indentified among the older workers' in the intervention group by asking their opinion about: 1) the intervention (VEP and PVC) as a whole; 2) the coaches' competence, and 3) the effect of the intervention on their own subjective vitality. Second, by means of registration forms filled in by the PVCs during each coaching visit, attendance to the coaching protocol (fidelity) will be assessed. Third, older workers in the intervention group will be asked to keep up a physical activity and fruit diary (reach, dose received, fidelity). Finally, the VEP sessions which will be delivered by the providers will be defined at pre-test (see 'design of the intervention'). Additionally, the fitness instructors will be asked to register the presence of the older workers at the guided group sessions (reach, dose received, fidelity). On the process evaluation, quantitative analyses will be performed.

Discussion

The aim of this article was to describe the development, and the design of the intended evaluation of a lifestyle programme aimed at improving vitality in older workers. Applying the IM protocol to develop the lifestyle programme required time and effort. However, it helped us to carefully consider each decision concerning the development of the lifestyle programme, and planning the implementation and evaluation of the lifestyle programme. Therefore, we perceived the use of the IM protocol as a useful tool that has guided us through the development of our lifestyle programme.

Strengths and weaknesses

The rising prevalence of older workers in the near future has created a need for cost-effective interventions that can prolong healthy employability of older workers. Consequently, one of the main strengths of the Vital@Work study is that this is the first RCT that evaluates the effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in order to improve both the mental en physical components of vitality. Another strength of the Vital@Work study is that as a result of applying the IM protocol, we developed a lifestyle programme taking into account both a theoretical framework and the perspectives of older workers on: 1) lifestyle, 2) vitality and, 3) how vitality can be improved by a lifestyle programme. We believe that this will lead to a better compliance to the lifestyle programme and therefore improve the likelihood of effectiveness of the lifestyle programme. However, limitations of this study can be mentioned. First, in this study only older workers from academic hospitals were involved in the focus group interviews. Therefore, it is possible that the IM process led to a lifestyle programme, which is only applicable to this specific target population. Second, it should also be noted that implementation of this lifestyle programme is likely to be more difficult in hospital settings where fitness facilities are not available in the direct environment.

Comparison with other studies

This type of lifestyle programme has not been evaluated in the setting of academic hospitals and in this target group (workers aged 45 years and over) yet. In addition, the combination of vigorous intensity physical activity with relaxation exercises (yoga), has not been reported before. However, several studies have reported the effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical health (e.g. aerobic fitness, BMI) [6368]. In addition, only a small number of studies reported the effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on mental health (e.g. well-being) [66]. The effectiveness of a lifestyle programme involving physical activity on vitality has not been evaluated before. Yoga appears to be effective in reducing stress and improving health status in adults [28, 69]. However, there are no studies available reporting the effect of yoga or relaxation exercises in (older) workers.

Conclusion

The development of the intervention according to the IM protocol resulted in a Vital@Work lifestyle programme specially tailored to the needs of older hospital workers. To determine the (cost-)effectiveness of the lifestyle programme, we will examine vitality, lifestyle behaviour (physical activity, relaxation, and fruit intake), work factors and aerobic fitness in a RCT. Results of the RCT will be available in 2011. If proven effective, both companies and society will benefit from a effective tool to keep older workers healthy and vital and thereby contribute to prolonged healthy employability.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the older workers for their contribution to the development of the intervention by participating in the focusgroup interviews. The Vital@Work study is financially supported by the 'Foundation Institute GAK'.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public and Occupational Health and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center
(2)
Body@Work, Research Center Physical Activity, Work and Health, TNO-VUmc

References

  1. Griffiths A: Ageing, health and productivity: a challenge for the new millennium. Work & Stress. 1997, 11: 197-214. 10.1080/02678379708256835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Van Nimwegen N, Beets G: Social situation observatory. Demography monitor 2005. Demographic trends, socio-economis impacts and policy implications in the European Union. The Hague, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. 2006Google Scholar
  3. Cai L, Kalb G: Health status and labour force participation: evidence from Australia. Health Econ. 2006, 15: 241-261. 10.1002/hec.1053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alavinia SM, Burdorf A: Unemployment and retirement and ill-health: a cross-sectional analysis across European countries. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008, 82: 39-45. 10.1007/s00420-008-0304-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Schuring M, Burdorf L, Kunst A, Mackenbach J: The effects of ill health on entering and maintaining paid employment: evidence in European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007, 61: 597-604. 10.1136/jech.2006.047456.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Lund T, Borg V: Work environment and self-rated health as predictors of remaining in work 5 years later among Danish employees 35-59 years of age. Exp Aging Res. 1999, 25: 429-434. 10.1080/036107399243904.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH: Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. 2006, San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass, SecondGoogle Scholar
  8. McNair DM, Lorr M, Droppleman LF: Manual for the profile of mood states. 1971, San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing ServiceGoogle Scholar
  9. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993, 31: 247-263. 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryan RM, Frederick C: On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J Pers. 1997, 65: 529-565. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB: Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University. 2003Google Scholar
  12. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB: Bevlogenheid: een begrip gemeten. Gedrag en Organisatie. 2004, 17: 90-112.Google Scholar
  13. Bouchard C, Shephard RJ: Physical activity, fitness, and health: the model and key concepts. Physical activity, fitness and health. International proceedings and consensus statement. Edited by: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stepehns T. 1994, Champaign: Human Kinetics BooksGoogle Scholar
  14. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM: Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985, 100: 126-131.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Shephard RJ, Bouchard C: Relationship between perceptions of physical activity and health-related fitness. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995, 35: 149-158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health. JAMA. 1996, 276: 241-246. 10.1001/jama.276.3.241.Google Scholar
  17. Kampert JB, Blair SN, Barlow CE, Kohl HW: Physical activity, physical fitness, and all-cause and cancer mortality: a prospective study of men and women. Ann Epidemiol. 1996, 6: 452-457. 10.1016/S1047-2797(96)00059-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Physical Activity and Health:A Report of the Surgeon General. At-a-Glance. 1996, Atlanta, USA, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  19. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR: Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005, 18: 189-193. 10.1097/00001504-200503000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Puetz TW: Physical activity and feelings of energy and fatigue: epidemiological evidence. Sports Med. 2006, 36: 767-780. 10.2165/00007256-200636090-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. World Health Organisation: The World Health Report, reducing Risks, promoting Healthy Life. 2002, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organisation (WHO), Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  22. World Health Organisation (WHO): Promoting Mental Health. Concepts, Emerging Evidence, Practice. 2005, Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organisation (WHO), Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  23. Myint PK, Welch AA, Bingham SA, Surtees PG, Wainwright NW, Luben RN, et al: Fruit and vegetable consumption and self-reported functional health in men and women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk): a population-based cross-sectional study. Public Health Nutr. 2007, 10: 34-41. 10.1017/S1368980007222608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Van Duyn MA, Pivonka E: Overview of the health benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional: selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000, 100: 1511-1521. 10.1016/S0002-8223(00)00420-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Utsugi MT, Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Kurimoto A, Sato RI, Suzuki K, et al: Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of hypertension determined by self measurement of blood pressure at home: the Ohasama study. Hypertens Res. 2008, 31: 1435-1443. 10.1291/hypres.31.1435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Shephard RJ: Exercise and relaxation in health promotion. Sports Med. 1997, 23: 211-217. 10.2165/00007256-199723040-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Patel C, Marmot MG: Stress management, blood pressure and quality of life. J Hypertens Suppl. 1987, 5: S21-S28. 10.1097/00004872-198712004-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Oken BS, Zajdel D, Kishiyama S, Flegal K, Dehen C, Haas M, et al: Randomized, controlled, six-month trial of yoga in healthy seniors: effects on cognition and quality of life. Altern Ther Health Med. 2006, 12: 40-47.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Fagerstrom K: The epidemiology of smoking: health consequences and benefits of cessation. Drugs. 2002, 62 (Suppl 2): 1-9. 10.2165/00003495-200262002-00001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Das SK: Harmful health effects of cigarette smoking. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003, 253: 159-165. 10.1023/A:1026024829294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ambrose JA, Barua RS: The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004, 43: 1731-1737. 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Zaher C, Halbert R, Dubois R, George D, Nonikov D: Smoking-related diseases: the importance of COPD. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004, 8: 1423-1428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukamal KJ: The effects of smoking and drinking on cardiovascular disease and risk factors. Alcohol Res Health. 2006, 29: 199-202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. White WB: Smoking-related morbidity and mortality in the cardiovascular setting. Prev Cardiol. 2007, 10: 1-4. 10.1111/j.1520-037X.2007.06050.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Rehm J, Room R, Graham K, Monteiro M, Gmel G, Sempos CT: The relationship of average volume of alcohol consumption and patterns of drinking to burden of disease: an overview. Addiction. 2003, 98: 1209-1228. 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00467.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Athyros VG, Liberopoulos EN, Mikhailidis DP, Papageorgiou AA, Ganotakis ES, Tziomalos K, et al: Association of drinking pattern and alcohol beverage type with the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease in a Mediterranean cohort. Angiology. 2007, 58: 689-697. 10.1177/0003319707306146.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Meister KA, Whelan EM, Kava R: The health effects of moderate alcohol intake in humans: an epidemiologic review. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2000, 37: 261-296. 10.1080/10408360091174222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sesso HD: Alcohol and cardiovascular health: recent findings. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001, 1: 167-172. 10.2165/00129784-200101030-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hildebrandt VH, Ooijendijk WTM, Hopman-Rock M: Trendreport Physical Activity and Health (In Dutch). 2007, Leiden, The Netherlands, TNO Quality of Life, 9-33. Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  40. Netherlands Bureau for food and Nutrition: Practical foodstuff guide (In Dutch). 1992, The Hague, the Netherlands, Voedingscentrum, Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  41. Commissie Richtlijn Goede Voeding: Guidelines for a healthy diet: recommendations drawn up by the Committee on Guidelines for Healthy Diet. (In Dutch). 1986, The Hague, The Netherlands: Dutch Nutrition Council, Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  42. Krauss RM, Eckel RH, Howard B, Appel LJ, Daniels SR, Deckelbaum RJ, et al: AHA Dietary Guidelines: revision A statement for healthcare professionals from the Nutrition Committee of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2000, 102: 2284-2299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Naska A, Vasdekis VG, Trichopoulou A, Friel S, Leonhauser IU, Moreiras O, et al: Fruit and vegetable availability among ten European countries: how does it compare with the 'five-a-day' recommendation? DAFNE I and II projects of the European Commission. Br J Nutr. 2000, 84: 549-556.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Statistics Netherlands (CBS): Reported health and lifestyle. 2009, The Hague, CBS Statline, Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  45. CDC: Cigarette smoking among Adults - United States 2007. MMWR. 2008, 57: 1221-1226.Google Scholar
  46. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al: Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007, 116: 1081-1093. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Pollock ML, Gaesser GA, Butcher JD, Després JP, Dishman RK, Franklin BA, et al: ACSM Position: Stand The Recommended Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory and Muscular Fitness, and Flexibility in Healthy Adults. 1998, 30 (6): 975-991. Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  48. American College of Sports Medicine: ACSM's Guideline for Exercise Testing and Prescription. 2006, Baltimore, USA, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Ref Type: Report, SeventhGoogle Scholar
  49. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: The recommended quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and flexibility in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30: 975-991. 10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WH, Kromhout D: Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003, 56: 1163-1169. 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00220-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G, Steenhuis I, Oenema A: A short dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health. 2002, 16: 85-106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, Bakker AB: The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002, 3: 71-92. 10.1023/A:1015630930326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Oja P, Mänttäri A, Pokki T, Kukkonen-Harjula K, Laukkanen RMT, Malmberg J, et al: UKK Walk Test - Tester's guide. 2001, Tampere, Finland: UKK InstituteGoogle Scholar
  54. Oja P, Laukkanen R, Pasanen M, Tyry T, Vuori I: A 2-km walking test for assessing the cardiorespiratory fitness of healthy adults. Int J Sports Med. 1991, 12: 356-362. 10.1055/s-2007-1024694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Raija MT, Laukkanen RMT, Oja P, Ojala ME, Vuori IM: Feasibility of a 2-km walking test for fitnes assessment in a population study. Scand J Soc Med. 1992, 20: 119-125.Google Scholar
  56. Koppes L, De Vroome EM, Mol M, Janssen B, Bossche van den S: De Nationale Enquête Arbeidsomstandigheden (NEA). 2008, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands, TNO Quality of Life, Ref Type: ReportGoogle Scholar
  57. Zee van der KI, Sanderman R: Het meten van gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36: een handleiding. Groningen: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvraagstukken. 1993Google Scholar
  58. Kessler RC, Barber C, Beck A, Berglund P, Cleary PD, McKenas D, et al: The World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ). J Occup Environ Med. 2003, 45: 156-174. 10.1097/01.jom.0000052967.43131.51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kessler RC, Ames M, Hymel PA, Loeppke R, McKenas DK, Richling DE, et al: Using the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) to evaluate the indirect workplace costs of illness. J Occup Environ Med. 2004, 46: S23-S37. 10.1097/01.jom.0000126683.75201.c5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. van Veldhoven M, Broersen S: Measurement quality and validity of the "need for recovery scale". Occup Environ Med. 2003, 60 (Suppl 1): i3-i9. 10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Murta SG, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B: Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2007, 21: 248-254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Steckler A, Linnan L: Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. An Overview. Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 2002, San Fransico, CA: Jossey-Bass Incorporated Publishers, 1-23.Google Scholar
  63. Atlantis E, Chow CM, Kirby A, Fiatarone Singh MA: Worksite intervention effects on physical health: a randomized controlled trial. Health Promot Int. 2006, 21: 191-200. 10.1093/heapro/dal012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Proper KI, Koning M, Beek van der AJ, Hildebrandt VH, Bosscher RJ, van MW: The effectiveness of worksite physical activity programs on physical activity, physical fitness, and health. Clin J Sport Med. 2003, 13: 106-117. 10.1097/00042752-200303000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O'Neal H, Shephard RJ: Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med. 1998, 15: 344-361. 10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00077-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Kerr JH, Vos MCH: Employee fitness programs, absenteeism and general well-being. Work & Stress. 1993, 179-190. 10.1080/02678379308257059.Google Scholar
  67. Dunn AL, Garcia ME, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Kohl HW, Blair SN: Six-month physical activity and fitness changes in Project Active, a randomized trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998, 30: 1076-1083. 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Addley K, McQuillan P, Ruddle M: Creating healthy workplaces in Northern Ireland: evaluation of a lifestyle and physical activity assessment programme. Occup Med (Lond). 2001, 51: 439-449. 10.1093/occmed/51.7.439.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith C, Hancock H, Blake-Mortimer J, Eckert K: A randomised comparative trial of yoga and relaxation to reduce stress and anxiety. Complement Ther Med. 2007, 15: 77-83. 10.1016/j.ctim.2006.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/408/prepub

Copyright

© Strijk et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement