Skip to main content

Tuberculosis treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence: an observational study of Bihar, India’s public care system covering >100,000,000 inhabitants



The effectiveness of India’s TB control programs depend critically on patients completing appropriate treatment. Discontinuing treatment prior to completion can leave patients infectious and symptomatic. Developing strategies to reduce early discontinuation requires characterizing its patterns and their link to symptom persistence.


The 2011 BEST-TB survey (360 clusters, 11 districts) sampled patients (n = 1007) from Bihar’s public healthcare system who had initiated treatment >6 months prior to being interviewed, administering questionnaires to patients about TB treatment duration and symptoms, prior treatment, and sociodemographic characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models estimated the risk of treatment discontinuation for these characteristics. Similar models estimated probabilities of symptom persistence to 25 weeks post-treatment initiation adjusting for the same predictors and treatment duration. All models included district fixed effects, robust standard errors, and adjustments for the survey sampling design. Treatment default timing and symptom persistence relied solely on self-report.


24% of patients discontinued treatment prior to 25 weeks. Higher likelihood of discontinuation occurred in those who had failed to complete previous TB treatment episodes (aOR: 4.77 [95% CI: 1.98 – 11.53]) and those seeing multiple providers (3.67 per provider [1.94 – 6.95]). Symptoms persisted in 42% of patients discontinuing treatment within 5 weeks versus 28% for completing 25 weeks of treatment. Symptom persistence was more likely for those with prior TB treatment (aOR: 5.05 [1.90 – 13.38]); poorer patients (2.94 [1.51 – 5.72]); and women (1.79 [1.07 – 2.99]). Predictors for treatment discontinuation prior to 16 weeks were similar.


Premature TB treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence is particularly high among individuals who have failed to complete treatment for a prior episode. Strategies to identify and promote treatment completion in this group appear promising. Likewise, effective TB regimens of shortened duration currently in trials may eventually help to achieve higher treatment completion rates.

Peer Review reports


Tuberculosis (TB) represents a major global health burden of particular concern given its growing resistance to available drugs. India bears the world’s largest TB burden with 3,000,000 cases in 2009 [1]. India’s substantial efforts to address TB through its public healthcare system have led to declines in TB prevalence and incidence [2]. More recently, India’s public healthcare system has also increased its efforts to address the emergence of multidrug resistant (MDR) TB (MDR is defined as TB resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid) [1, 37].

Premature TB treatment discontinuation (i.e., default) hampers TB control efforts. Early discontinuation implies exposure to TB drugs for durations insufficient to effect cure. Such exposures may also select for drug resistant strains [8, 9] that require treatment that is longer and more toxic than for non-MDR TB [914].

Because TB treatment is lengthy, complicated, and potentially toxic, premature treatment discontinuation among a fraction of patients is almost inevitable, prompting efforts to reduce the current length of treatment, which exceeds 25 weeks [2]. Development of shorter treatments (e.g., 4-month regimens containing quinolones) [15, 16] could potentially reduce the chance of premature discontinuation and drug resistance. However, success depends partly on the timing of discontinuation – if discontinuation happens frequently in the first month of treatment, shortening regimens to even 2 months would not change cure rates. The patterns and timing of treatment discontinuation and the factors predicting discontinuation are not well characterized in many high TB burden settings.

In India, treatment discontinuation is high as patients with active TB disease are often poor, socially disadvantaged, and under-educated; alcohol use also contributes to higher discontinuation rates [1724]. Many patients first receive ineffective care in the private health sector, which saps resources and delays their entry into the public system [2527]. As their symptoms improve with effective treatment, continued costs, inconvenience, and toxicity risks may make remaining on treatment increasingly unappealing. For these reasons, treatment discontinuation likely differs among those who have been treated previously in the private sector and is likely linked to the pace at which patients’ symptoms improve. Understanding differences in patterns of discontinuation for treatment-experienced and for treatment-naïve patients is needed because multiple treatment exposures increase the probability of accumulating mutations resistant to specific medications, raising the risk of MDR TB.

Bihar exemplifies the challenges of India’s TB epidemic given its historically high levels of poverty and poor health outcomes [28, 29]. Bihar’s population exceeds 100 million people [30] (approximately 10% of India’s total), its public healthcare system registered 76,484 patients for TB treatment in 2011 [30], and it likely sees an appreciable proportion of drug resistant TB [3033].

The present study focuses on patients treated for TB in Bihar’s public healthcare system. It had two goals: 1) characterize treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence despite treatment; and 2) identify characteristics of TB patients and their healthcare experiences that predict these outcomes and are potentially amenable to interventions to reduce rates of premature treatment discontinuation.


Ethics statement

The study analyzes data from the Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine - Tuberculosis (BEST-TB) survey which received Institutional Review Board review and approvals from Duke University and Stanford University in the U.S. and from Society for the Promotion of Ethical Clinical Trials – Ethics Review Board (SPECT-ERB) in India. Research permissions were also granted by the Governments of India and of the State of Bihar. All subjects provided written informed consent.

Survey, sample and data collection

The 2011 BEST-TB survey, a cross-sectional survey of TB patients treated in the public healthcare system in 11 districts of Bihar, India, provided data for the present analysis. The survey occurred in 360 rural clusters (Figure 1) whose sampling was determined as part of the baseline for a larger evaluation of interventions for a variety of diseases [34]. To represent patients receiving care in the public TB healthcare system, we constructed the sampling frame using TB patient lists from all Primary Health Centers (PHCs) within the study clusters as India’s Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) provides standard TB medications and care free of charge according to the Directly Observed Treatment Short Course (DOTS) protocol to an estimated 60% of TB cases [3539]. For potential inclusion in the study, enumerators recorded names and addresses of all TB patients entered on PHC lists within the past year (July 2010- July 2011) living within study clusters (i.e., village catchments representing part of the catchment served by a given PHC). Combining these names for each cluster generated the cluster’s sample list. From each cluster’s list, 6 patients were randomly sampled for study inclusion; all patients were included from cluster lists with fewer than 6 names. While the planned sample size was 2160, a review of all PHC records indicated that 20 clusters had no patients treated in the previous year and living within a study catchment area, and 22% of cluster lists had ≤6 names. Hence, 1691 patients were selected for subsequent household survey. There were no additional exclusion criteria.

Figure 1

Map of regions surveyed within districts of Bihar (Inset map showing location of Bihar within India). The figure shows the map of Bihar and its districts. Gray areas represent the survey regions containing the 360 study clusters. Hashed areas represent survey regions with no TB patients eligible for study inclusion. The inset map of India shows the state of Bihar (Black) along with all other Indian states.

Response rates to enumerators visiting and surveying each patient’s household were high. Just 44 households (2.6%) were not surveyed because they could not be located or no competent respondent was found. Of the remaining 1647 households, 5 refused (0.3%) and 68 reported that the TB patient had died (4.0%). Additionally, 28 patients provided incomplete data and were excluded. Household surveys were completed for 1546 patients (91.4% response rate of households contacted for inclusion). Because the present analyses focus on the treatment experience of patients in the RNTCP public system which according to DOTS treatment category should be at least 25 weeks in length, we restricted our analyses to patients initiating treatment at least 6 months prior to the interview (1007 patients).

Based on each TB patient’s responses to the questionnaire, we reconstructed a timeline of his or her illness and treatment relying solely on patient self-report. Because of the high variability of data recorded in the treatment records at the PHCs in our prior piloting of the survey, we did not use these records for our analysis. Instead, we relied solely on patients reporting their detailed experiences of common TB symptoms: persistent cough (≥3 weeks), coughing blood, fever, weight loss, night sweats, chronic fatigue, and loss of appetite [40, 41]. We recorded their reported number of days since the onset of each symptom and the number of days each persisted. We recorded the number of days each patient waited to seek care, before a diagnosis was received, and before beginning treatment. Finally, we recorded the number of days each patient reported remaining on treatment in the public system. We refer to the patient’s most recent episode of TB as the current episode, regardless of whether the patient remained ill at the time of survey. Patients also provided information about treatment for TB prior to the current episode, demographic characteristics, household composition and household assets.


Main outcomes were treatment discontinuation prior to 25 weeks (hereafter simply “treatment discontinuation”) and symptom persistence. Given policy interest in shorter treatment regimens, we repeated our analysis for treatment discontinuation prior to 16 weeks. Given policy interest in shorter treatment regimens and heterogeneity in current treatment regimens, we repeated our analysis for treatment discontinuation prior to 16 weeks for the entire sample and prior to 32 weeks for those with prior TB treatment episodes. Symptom persistence was defined as having ≥1 TB symptom 25 weeks after treatment initiation. We also explored an alternate model using the number of TB symptoms present at 25 weeks.


Main predictors of treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence were reporting treatment for a prior episode of TB and completion of prior TB treatment. It is unclear whether those with prior TB treatment are more or less likely to complete treatment for their current episode. If patients are already familiar with treatment, those choosing to repeat treatment may remain in care longer than first-time patients. However, patients who have undergone prior TB treatment may experience treatment fatigue and discontinue earlier. Failure to complete the prior TB treatment is hypothesized to predict early discontinuation from the current treatment episode. Because repeated treatment can select for MDR particularly if treatment is not completed and MDR is more difficult to cure [32, 42], we also hypothesize that both prior TB treatment and failing to complete prior treatment predict symptom persistence at the end of the current episode of treatment, while noting that there are other reasons for symptoms to persist (residual lesions even after cure; other respiratory ailments) which we cannot distinguish.

TB illness, treatment, and costs

A patient’s total number of symptoms at the time of seeking care proxied for illness severity at baseline. We controlled for treatment delays in two ways [4351]. First, we used the number of weeks between symptom onset and treatment initiation. Second, we used the number of treatment providers seen for the current episode. Additionally, although treatment for TB through RNTCP should be free to the patient, we included indicators for whether the patient reported paying for service or medication fees, for travel to the site of care, or both [37, 52]. We hypothesized that more severely ill patients remain in care longer, but are also more likely to have symptoms persist. The relationship of treatment discontinuation to both delays in seeking treatment and for having seen additional providers prior to treatment in the public system was unclear. If illness severity worsens with longer delays, patients may remain in care longer. However, treatment delays may indicate unobserved characteristics that imply higher discontinuation rates. We hypothesize that both treatment delays and seeing more providers are associated with greater symptom persistence. We hypothesize that paying for service and medications fees and travel costs are associated with higher treatment default and consequently with greater symptom persistence.

Patient and household characteristics

We included patient sex, religion (Hindu vs. non-Hindu), social group (scheduled caste, scheduled tribe, or other backwards class vs. other castes), age (years), and education (0 if illiterate and number of years of education among the literate). We hypothesize that men, Hindus, those with higher education and those belonging to “other castes” remain in care longer and are less likely to have symptom persistence [37, 5355]. Household assets proxied for wealth based on a wealth index constructed using a standard principle components analysis of assets [56] and then grouped households into relative wealth tertiles, acknowledging that most TB households are not wealthy compared to India’s general population [57]. We accounted for household composition in two ways: the number of people residing in the home and number of children below age 5 in the home. We hypothesized that patients from the poorest households are more likely to discontinue treatment prior to 25 weeks [37, 5355, 58]. If larger households have more resources to compensate for lost work and time devoted to TB treatment, then patients from larger households will remain in care longer. However, the demands associated with children in the household imply higher opportunity costs of continued treatment. We therefore expect that number of children is positively correlated with treatment discontinuation. The combined effects of household composition on symptom persistence were unclear.

Statistical analysis

We predicted the likelihood of ending treatment before 25 weeks using a multivariate logistic regression model. We estimated the model using all 1007 patients controlling for prior TB treatment and treatment completion, repeating the analysis separately for 196 patients with prior TB treatment and for 811 with no prior treatment to examine differential effects of other predictors within these subgroups. The Supporting Information also reports a linear probability model of treatment discontinuation prior to 25 weeks and both logistic regression and linear probability models of treatment discontinuation prior to 16 weeks of treatment for the entire sample and prior to 32 weeks for those with prior TB treatment episodes. We likewise assessed determinants of symptom persistence 25 weeks after treatment initiation using a multivariate logistic model. The Supporting Information also reports a negative binomial model for the number of symptoms persisting 25 weeks post treatment initiation. For symptom persistence, we included the same predictors as for default along with duration in treatment covariates. We explored multiple definitions of duration of treatment including an indicator for completing ≥180 days of treatment; number of weeks of completed treatment; and indicators for completing 0-8 weeks, 9-16 weeks, and >16 weeks.

For all analyses, the multivariate models did not employ variable selection techniques but instead included all predictors for which there was a theory-predicted relationship to the outcome. Likewise, for all analyses, we included district-level fixed effects to control for unobserved characteristics of healthcare systems, geographic areas, and patient populations within each district. We also adjusted for survey design using inverse probability sampling weights and calculated robust standard errors clustered by sampling unit [59].


Table 1 reports descriptive statistics for the sample of 1007 TB patients receiving treatment in the public healthcare system in Bihar who initiated treatment >180 days prior to their household interview. Their characteristics were generally consistent with those reported for other Indian TB populations [3539].

Table 1 Description of TB patients

Treatment discontinuation

Individuals who did not complete treatment for prior episodes of TB have differentially higher probabilities of discontinuing treatment prior to 25 weeks in their current TB treatment episode compared to those with no prior episodes and those who completed treatment for their prior episodes (Figure 2). More than 69% [95% CI 50-89%] of the 39 patients who reported that they had not completed their previous TB treatment also failed to complete at least 25 weeks of their current treatment (median time to default 17 weeks) compared to 28% [95% CI: 16-40%] of the 157 patients who reported completing their previous treatment and 21% [95% CI: 17-26%] of the 811 patients treated for the first time (median time to default 25 weeks and 24 weeks respectively).

Figure 2

Cumulative risk of treatment default stratified by prior TB treatment and prior treatment completion. The figure shows the proportion of TB patients who have ended treatment during the first 25 weeks of treatment. In addition to showing the overall rate of treatment default (solid line), separate curves are shown for patients with no prior TB treatment episodes, patients with prior TB episodes where they completed prior treatment, and patients with prior TB episodes where they did not complete treatment.

Individuals who had prior TB episodes but did not complete treatment have higher probability of discontinuing their current treatment episodes after adjusting for multiple factors (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 4.77 [95% CI: 1.98 – 11.53]) (Table 2). Discontinuation probabilities of those who completed prior TB treatment are similar to those without prior treatment (approximately 1.05 after combining the aOR for prior TB with the interaction aOR for completing prior treatment: 0.22 [95% CI: 0.08 – 0.59]). Seeing more treatment providers for the current episode of TB predicts higher probabilities of treatment discontinuation (aOR: 3.67 per provider seen [95% CI: 1.94 – 6.95]). When one considers the effects of paying for treatment costs, travel costs, and the amount paid, paying anything predicts higher rates of treatment discontinuation, while those who are able to pay more and choose to do so are less likely to discontinue treatment.

Table 2 Likelihood of treatment discontinuation <25 weeks after treatment initiation: logistic regression results

Predictors of treatment discontinuation are distinct when the analysis is repeated separately for those with and without prior TB treatment. Significant predictors of higher probability of treatment discontinuation among those treated for TB previously are having not completed the prior episode of TB treatment along with personal characteristics including having fewer TB symptoms at the time of treatment initiation, younger age, less education, and being non-Hindu. In contrast, for those who had not been treated previously, significant predictors of greater probability of treatment discontinuation were not individual characteristics including number of symptoms as a marker for illness severity but rather care seeking pathways like the number of providers seen for the current episode of TB treatment and payment for treatment and related costs. The direction of these relationships generally remains consistent when analyses are repeated using a linear probability model though at times significance attenuates (see Additional file 1).

The predictors of treatment discontinuation within 4 months of starting treatment are consistent with the results of the main analysis – having had prior TB treatment that was not completed (aOR: 4.63 [95% CI: 1.88 – 11.42]), and seeing more providers (aOR per provider: 5.60 [95% CI: 2.18 – 14.37]) (see Additional files 2 and 3).

Symptom persistence

Symptoms persisted 25 weeks after treatment initiation for 28% of patients despite remaining in treatment for at least 25 weeks (Figure 3). Among patients discontinuing treatment early, symptoms persisted in 42% of patients completing ≤5 weeks, 33% of patients completing ≤10 weeks, and 30% of patients completing ≤18 weeks. Symptoms most likely to persist despite 25 weeks of treatment include fatigue (18% of patients), appetite loss (16%), night sweats (15%), weight loss (14%) and coughing (11%) (Figure 3). Persistence of symptoms followed different trajectories for those with and without prior TB treatment with symptoms more likely to persist for those with prior TB treatment (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Proportion of TB patients with symptoms persisting by time since treatment initiation. The figure shows the proportion of patients with any symptoms and with specific symptoms a given number of weeks after treatment initiation for all patients and stratified by patients with and without prior TB episodes.

TB symptom persistence 25 weeks post treatment initiation is more likely for those with prior TB treatment (aOR: 5.05 [95% CI: 1.90 – 13.38]), poorer patients (aOR for lowest wealth tertile among TB households: 2.94 [95% CI: 1.51 – 5.72]), and women (aOR of men compared to women: 0.56 [95% CI: 0.33 – 0.93]) (Table 3). For those with prior TB, the main predictors of symptom persistence are the number of treatment providers seen (aOR per provider seen: 3.76 [95% CI: 1.00 – 14.11]) (Table 3). For those with no prior TB, the main predictors of symptom persistence are not actually paying for treatments, medications and travel which is likely a marker of poverty in terms of the inability to pay, and poverty as explicitly measured by being in the lowest wealth tertile among TB households (aOR: 2.91 [95% CI: 1.50 – 5.68]) (Table 3). Notably, number of symptoms at treatment initiation did not predict symptom persistence.

Table 3 Likelihood of symptom persistence (symptoms at 25 weeks after treatment initiation): logistic regression results

Results for predictors of symptom persistence remain largely consistent when the number of symptoms present 25 weeks after treatment initiation is used as the outcome, when different specifications for time in treatment are used as predictors in both linear probability models and logistic regression models, and when we estimate a model of symptom persistence 16 weeks after treatment initiation (see Additional files 4,5 and 6).


24% of surveyed TB patients reported failing to complete at least 25 weeks of treatment in Bihar’s public healthcare system. The rate of premature treatment discontinuation was nearly 59% for patients who had previously started but not finished TB treatment. High discontinuation rates are concerning given that a proportion of these patients that undergo inappropriately short treatment may remain infectious and because ineffective exposures to TB medications may select for drug resistant mutations. For 28% of patients, symptoms persist after 25 weeks of treatment; symptom persistence is even more common for those discontinuing treatment and for patients previously treated for TB, suggesting a lack of cure in some patients.

Our study contributes to the prior literature [1724] and extends knowledge by connecting premature treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence. Main predictors of treatment discontinuation are consistent with prior studies as are those for symptom persistence. The link between treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence especially in patients receiving repeated TB treatment over multiple illness episodes is important because it illustrates a subgroup of patients who may benefit from further supportive interventions and who are important candidates for further TB and MDR TB control efforts.

TB treatment in the private healthcare sector plays a role in our analysis as a predictor of treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence but is also additionally important in its own right. Limited data from the private healthcare sector and from the studies evaluating public-private partnerships for TB treatment [6062] suggest that, in these settings, treatment duration is often too short, provider switching too frequent, and delays in care too long. We know of no data examining symptom persistence after treatment in these settings. Given that approximately 40% of patients are treated in these settings even if they ultimately receive care in the public healthcare sector, studies similar to ours evaluating outcomes in the private healthcare sector in a representative patient population could provide substantial new insights to enable the improvement of TB care.

Our findings suggest areas for policy design. Strategies that increase cure rates and link private providers to the public system so patients receive prompt, effective treatment [47, 60, 63] could potentially reduce TB treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence. This is supported by our findings that in addition to higher treatment discontinuation rates and greater symptom persistence in those who have been treated for prior TB episodes, treatment discontinuation rates and symptom persistence for the current episode are higher among individuals who sought care with private providers before being treated in the public system. Likewise, programs that reach marginalized groups are needed given symptom persistence is higher among women and the poor.

Our findings regarding the timing of treatment discontinuation (Figure 2) also support the potential benefits of treatment regimens that achieve cure more rapidly and thus reduce required treatment duration [15, 16]. Rates at which patients discontinue treatment are relatively constant over 25 weeks and do not appear to be especially high during the first few months. Further, predictors of treatment discontinuation before 16 weeks follow the same pattern as those for 25 weeks (Additional files 2 and 3). These findings suggest that reducing treatment duration from 25 weeks to 16 weeks could yield an absolute percentage point increase in treatment completion of almost 10%.

While one might expect highest default rates early on in treatment, at least for those individuals with prior TB treatment, the rate of default increases 45-90 days after treatment initiation (see Additional file 7). While one might have anticipated higher rates of discontinuation during the difficult period of injectable use, our finding could potentially be explained by patients believing that “real, necessary treatment” was over because they simply felt better or because they believed that injections constituted effective treatment and that phase of their treatment was over [64].

Our study has several limitations. Patients sampled are from Bihar only. While other states differ in terms of TB care and outcomes [2, 30], Bihar’s population of 100 million represent roughly 10% of India’s total and is larger than most high burden countries. Patients are only sampled from the public healthcare sector, and, therefore, the study cannot comment on individuals who receive care only in the private sector, though other research shows high levels of provider switching in the private sector [39, 46] and low levels of effective medication use [2527]. Likewise, information on alcohol consumption in the BEST survey was limited and could not be included in the present analysis, though other prior studies have found that alcoholism is linked to TB treatment default [65, 66].

An important study limitation is the reliance on self-report of default and default timing as well as TB status and symptoms without external validation. Our findings of default rates differ from those reported for comparable areas of Bihar and are generally substantially lower, though we note the appreciable heterogeneity across districts on numerous measures of program performance with some districts performing at 50% of other districts (Additional files 8,9,10 and 11) [6772]. The difference in default rates could result from under-reporting of default in official government reports, over-reporting of default on the part of patients, or a combination of the two. Our study is unable to distinguish between these possibilities, though even if levels of default differ or are not perfectly representative of all of Bihar or other parts of India, differentially higher default rates among individuals who have had multiple exposures to TB drugs, as is also seen in official reports (Additional files 8,9,10 and 11), and ongoing symptoms are clearly of concern.

The study does not include clinical measures (i.e., sputum smears or drug sensitivity testing) or other administrative records that were found to be frequently incomplete in the study areas. For this reason, specific medications and dosing, laboratory tests and results are absent from the analysis. Furthermore, self-report is subject to potential recall bias. We therefore select outcomes and interpret results conservatively. We consider the persistence of symptoms suggestive of failure to achieve cure and chronic disease at least in some patients but note that although the elimination of symptoms is of high value to patients, absence of symptoms does not prove cure, since it is also consistent with suppression to latent infection. Furthermore, while we adjust for symptom presence at baseline, symptom persistence could imply the presence of other illnesses or the lasting effects of TB even post-cure. Likewise, we focus on treatment default which is linked to lower TB cure rates in the context of the well-documented selection for resistance that occurs with exposure to TB medication for insufficient duration but purposively avoid definitive conclusions about multidrug resistance status, which we cannot ascertain without laboratory measures.

DOTS regimens employ particular combinations medications for durations that are differentiated for reasons including past TB treatment [73, 74]. While our data did not permit a clear delineation of which respondent was on 6 months of Category I DOTS treatment versus 8 months of Category II DOTS treatment, in an analysis confined to individuals previously treated for TB who should be in Category II treatment (see Additional files 12 and 7), we found that treatment discontinuation rates appeared higher among patients who had not completed their prior episodes of TB treatment relative to those who had 45-90 days after the start of treatment and that predictors of treatment discontinuation prior to 8 months were similar to those for prior to 6 months, though power to achieve statistical significance was limited. These findings may be explained in part by the fact that Category II includes an additional, injectable drug (Streptomycin) and a longer intensive phase which might be expected to result in a higher default rate given additional toxicities/side effects (including pain of injections) and inconvenience.

Given that it is commonly believed that at least 6 months of treatment is required to ensure cure in >95% of cases and that the 6-month benchmark is commonly used to assess TB treatment programs, we assessed discontinuation using a logistic regression with discontinuation coded as 1 regardless of whether an individual had completed 1 or 5 months of treatment prior to discontinuing. Alternative survival analyses like those using Cox proportional hazards models can be used to analyze outcomes and may well provide important additional information and power, though mapping from the hazard rate ratios they produce to questions about the likelihood of completing at least 6 months of treatment is substantially less straightforward.

The links between treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence and the mediation of this effect by prior episodes of TB treatment are a complex area of study. Methods like time series analyses that assess evidence of Granger causality along with marginal structural modeling techniques may be useful in further elucidating the nuances of these relationships in future work.


Premature TB treatment discontinuation remains a substantial problem in 11 districts in Bihar especially among individuals who repeatedly seek TB care. Over 25% of patients have persistent symptoms 25 weeks after treatment initiation; and symptom persistence is more likely for those defaulting early, previously treated and the poor. These are concerning findings given bacteriologic evidence from other studies on the greater likelihood of continued infectiousness among individuals who terminate treatment early and the role of treatment discontinuation in the selection of multidrug resistance. Approaches that reduce treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence should be considered as part of efforts to bolster TB control in settings like Bihar.



Bihar evaluation of social franchising and telemedicine - tuberculosis


Directly observed treatment short course


Multidrug resistant tuberculosis


Primary health centers


Revised national tuberculosis control programme


Society for the promotion of ethical clinical trials – ethics review board




  1. 1.

    World Health Organization: Global Tuberculosis Control 2011. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Central TB Division: TB India 2011: Revised National TB Control Programme Annual Status Report. 2010, New Delhi, India: Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Crofton J, Chaulet P, Maher D: Guidelines for The Management Of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. 1997, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Heym B, Honore N, Truffot-Pernot C, Banerjee A, Schurra C, Jacobs WR, van Embden JD, Grosset JH, Cole ST: Implications of multidrug resistance for the future of short-course chemotherapy of tuberculosis: a molecular study. Lancet. 1994, 344 (8918): 293-298. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91338-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rowland K: Totally Drug-Resistant TB Emerges in India. Nature News. 2012, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    World Health Organization: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis No At Record Levels. 2010, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    World Health Organization: India: Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Profile. 2011, Geneva: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hanif M, Malik S, Dhingra VK: Acquired drug resistance pattern in tuberculosis cases at the State Tuberculosis Centre, Delhi, India. Int J Tuberc Lung D. 2009, 13 (1): 74-78.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sharma SK, Kaushik G, Jha B, George N, Arora SK: Prevalence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among newly diagnosed cases of sputum-positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2011, 133: 308-311.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Andrews JR, Gandhi NR, Moodley P, Shah NS, Bohlken L, Moll AP, Pillay M, Friedland G, Sturm AW, Collaborat TFCR: Exogenous reinfection as a cause of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Rural South Africa. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198 (11): 1582-1589. 10.1086/592991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Singla R, Sarin R, Khalid UK, Mathuria K, Singla N: Seven-year DOTS-plus pilot experience in India; results, constraints and issues. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009, 13: 976-981.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Suen SC, Bendavid E, Goldhaber-Fiebert JD: Disease control implications of India's changing multi-drug resistant tuberculosis epidemic. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (3): e89822-10.1371/journal.pone.0089822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Thomas A, Ramachandran R, Rehaman F, Jaggarajamma K, Santha T, Selvakumar N, Krishnan N, Mohan NS, Sundaram V, Wares F, Narayanan PR: Management of multi-drug resistance tuberculosis in the field: tuberculosis research center experience. Indian J Tuberc. 2007, 54 (3): 117-124.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhao YL, Xu SF, Wang LX, Chin DP, Wang SF, Jiang GL, Xia H, Zhou Y, Li Q, Ou XC, Pang Y, Song YY, Zhao B, Zhang HT, He GX, Guo J, Wang Y: National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. New Engl J Med. 2012, 366 (23): 2161-2170. 10.1056/NEJMoa1108789.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Controlled Comparison of Two Moxifloxacin Containing Treatment Shortening Regimens in Pulmonary Tuberculosis (REMoxTB).,

  16. 16.

    A Controlled Trial of a 4-Month Quinolone-Containing Regimen for the Treatment of Pulmonary.,

  17. 17.

    Sai Babu B, Satyanarayana AVV, Venkateshwaralu G, Ramakrishna U, Vikram P, Sahu S, Wares F, Dewan PK, Santosha K, Jyoti J, Chethana R, Neelima T, Vinod P, Yogesh M, Chauhan L: Initial default among diagnosed sputum smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Tuberc Lung D. 2008, 12 (9): 1055-1058.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jaggarajamma K, Sudha G, Chandrasekaran V, Nirupa C, Thomas A, Santha T, Muniyandi M, Narayanan PR: Reasons for non-compliance among patients treated under Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP), Tiruvallur District, South India. Indian J Tuberc. 2007, 54 (3): 130-135.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Jha UM, Satyanarayana S, Dewan PK, Chadha S, Wares F, Sahu S, Gupta D, Chauhan LS: Risk factors for treatment default among re-treatment tuberculosis patients in India. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (1): e8873-10.1371/journal.pone.0008873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mandal PK, Mandal A, Bhattacharyya SK: Comparing the Daily Versus the Intermittent Regimens of the Anti-Tubercular Chemotherapy in the Initial Intensive Phase in Non-HIV, Sputum Positive, Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013, 7 (2): 292-295.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mukherjee A, Saha I, Sarkar A, Chowdhury R: Gender differences in notification rates, clinical forms and treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients under the RNTCP. Lung India. 2012, 29 (2): 120-122. 10.4103/0970-2113.95302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sachdeva KS, Satyanarayana S, Dewan PK, Nair SA, Reddy R, Kundu D, Chadha SS, Venkatachalaiah AK, Parmar M, Chauhan LS: Source of previous treatment for re-treatment TB cases registered under the National TB control Programme, India, 2010. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (7): e22061-10.1371/journal.pone.0022061.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Srinath S, Sharath B, Santosha K, Chadha SS, Roopa S, Chander K, Wares F, Chauhan LS, Wilson NC, Harries AD: Tuberculosis 'retreatment others’: profile and treatment outcomes in the state of Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Tuberc Lung D. 2011, 15 (1): 105-109.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vijay S, Kumar P, Chauhan LS, Vollepore BH, Kizhakkethil UP, Rao SG: Risk factors associated with default among new smear positive TB patients treated under DOTS in India. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (3): 3-

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Udwadia ZF, Pinto LM, Uplekar MW: Tuberculosis management by private practitioners in Mumbai, India: has anything changed in two decades?. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (8): e12023-10.1371/journal.pone.0012023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Uplekar MW, Shepard DS: Treatment of tuberculosis by private general practitioners in India. Tubercle. 1991, 72 (4): 284-290. 10.1016/0041-3879(91)90055-W.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vandan N, Ali M, Prasad R, Kuroiwa C: Assessment of doctors’ knowledge regarding tuberculosis management in Lucknow, India: a public-private sector comparison. Public Health. 2009, 123: 484-489. 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.05.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    International Institute for Population Sciences: Reproductive and Child Health: District Level Household Survey (DLHS-2), 2002-04. 2006, Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS): District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08. 2010, Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Government of India Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Central TB Division: TB India 2012: Revised National TB Control Programme annual status repor. 2012, New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Central TB Division

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Barat D, Kumar G: Prevalence and pattern of acquired drug resistance in tuberculosis including MDR-TB in Bihar. Assoc Physicians India. 2003, 51: 327-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gandhi NR, Nunn P, Dheda K, Schaaf HS, Zignol M, van Soolingen D, Jensen P, Bayona J: Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2010, 375 (9728): 1830-1843. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60410-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wright A, Zignol M, Van Deun A, Falzon D, Gerdes SR, Feldman K, Hoffner S, Drobniewski F, Barrera L, van Soolingen D, Boulabhal F, Paramasivan CN, Kam KM, Mitarai S, Nunn P, Raviglione M: Epidemiology of antituberculosis drug resistance 2002-07: an updated analysis of the Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. Lancet. 2009, 373 (9678): 1861-1873. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60331-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Collaborations for Health System Improvement and Impact Evaluation in India.,

  35. 35.

    Chadha VK, Kumar P, Anjinappa SM, Singh S, Narasimhaiah S, Joshi MV, Gupta J, Lakshminarayana , Ramchandra J, Velu M, Papkainathan S, Babu S, Krishna H: Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis among adults in a rural sub-district of South India. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e42625-10.1371/journal.pone.0042625.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kolappan C, Subramani R, Chandrasekaran V, Thomas A: Trend in tuberculosis infection prevalence in a rural area in South India after implementation of the DOTS strategy. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012, 16 (10): 1315-1319. 10.5588/ijtld.12.0098.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Oxlade O, Murray M: Tuberculosis and poverty: why are the poor at greater risk in India?. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e47533-10.1371/journal.pone.0047533.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rao VG, Bhat J, Yadav R, Gopalan GP, Nagamiah S, Bhondeley MK, Anjinappa SM, Ramchandra J, Chadha VK, Wares F: Prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis–a baseline survey in central India. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e43225-10.1371/journal.pone.0043225.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Satyanarayana S, Nair SA, Chadha SS, Shivashankar R, Sharma G, Yadav S, Mohanty S, Kamineni V, Wilson NC, Harries AD, Dewan PK: From where are tuberculosis patients accessing treatment in India? results from a cross-sectional community based survey of 30 districts. PLoS One. 2011, 6 (9): e24160-10.1371/journal.pone.0024160.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Corbett EL, Zezai A, Cheung YB, Bandason T, Dauya E, Munyati SS, Butterworth AE, Rusikaniko S, Churchyard GJ, Mungofa S, Hayes RJ, Mason PR: Provider-initiated symptom screening for tuberculosis in Zimbabwe: diagnostic value and the effect of HIV status. Bull World Health Organ. 2010, 88 (1): 13-21. 10.2471/BLT.08.055467.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    van der Werf MJ, Enarson DA, Borgdorff MW: How to identify tuberculosis cases in a prevalence survey. Int J Tuberc Lung D. 2008, 12 (11): 1255-1260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    The World Health Organization: Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response. 2010, The World Health Organization: Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Charles N, Thomas B, Watson B, Raja Sakthivel M, Chandrasekeran V, Wares F: Care seeking behavior of chest symptomatics: a community based study done in South India after the implementation of the RNTCP. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (9): e12379-10.1371/journal.pone.0012379.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dhingra VK, Rajpal S, Taneja DK, Kalra D, Malhotra R: Health care seeking pattern of tuberculosis patients attending an urban TB clinic in Delhi. J Commun Dis. 2002, 34 (3): 185-192.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Dye C: The potential impact of new diagnostic tests on tuberculosis epidemics. Indian J Med Res. 2012, 135 (5): 737-744.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kapoor SK, Raman AV, Sachdeva KS, Satyanarayana S: How did the TB patients reach DOTS services in Delhi? A study of patient treatment seeking behavior. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (8): e42458-10.1371/journal.pone.0042458.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pantoja A, Lonnroth K, Lal SS, Chauhan LS, Uplekar M, Padma MR, Unnikrishnan KP, Rajesh J, Kumar P, Sahu S, Wares F, Floyd K: Economic evaluation of public-private mix for tuberculosis care and control, India. Part II. Cost and cost-effectiveness. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009, 13 (6): 705-712.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Pradhan A, Kielmann K, Gupte H, Bamne A, Porter JD, Rangan S: What 'outliers’ tell us about missed opportunities for tuberculosis control: a cross-sectional study of patients in Mumbai, India. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 263-10.1186/1471-2458-10-263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rajeswari R, Chandrasekaran V, Suhadev M, Sivasubramaniam S, Sudha G, Renu G: Factors associated with patient and health system delays in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002, 6 (9): 789-795.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sudha G, Nirupa C, Rajasakthivel M, Sivasusbramanian S, Sundaram V, Bhatt S, Subramaniam K, Thiruvalluvan E, Mathew R, Renu G, Santha T: Factors influencing the care-seeking behaviour of chest symptomatics: a community-based study involving rural and urban population in Tamil Nadu, South India. Trop Med Int Health. 2003, 8 (4): 336-341. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01010.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tamhane A, Ambe G, Vermund SH, Kohler CL, Karande A, Sathiakumar N: Pulmonary tuberculosis in Mumbai, India: factors responsible for patient and treatment delays. Int J Prev Med. 2012, 3 (8): 569-580.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mauch V, Bonsu F, Gyapong M, Awini E, Suarez P, Marcelino B, Melgen RE, Lonnroth K, Nhung NV, Hoa NB, Klinkenberg E: Free tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment are not enough: patient cost evidence from three continents. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013, 17 (3): 381-387. 10.5588/ijtld.12.0368.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Dye C, Lonnroth K, Jaramillo E, Williams BG, Raviglione M: Trends in tuberculosis incidence and their determinants in 134 countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2009, 87 (9): 683-691. 10.2471/BLT.08.058453.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Goldhaber-Fiebert JD, Jeon CY, Cohen T, Murray MB: Diabetes mellitus and tuberculosis in countries with high tuberculosis burdens: individual risks and social determinants. Int J Epidemiol. 2011, 40 (2): 417-428. 10.1093/ije/dyq238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rasanathan K, Sivasankara Kurup A, Jaramillo E, Lonnroth K: The social determinants of health: key to global tuberculosis control. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011, 15 (Suppl 2): S30-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Filmer D, Pritchett LH: Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data - Or tears: an application to educational enrollments in states of India. Demography. 2001, 38 (1): 115-132.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International: National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) 2005-06, India: Key Findings. 2007, Mumbai: IIPS

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Muniyandi M, Ramachandran R, Gopi PG, Chandrasekaran V, Subramani R, Sadacharam K, Kumaran P, Santha T, Wares F, Narayanan PR: The prevalence of tuberculosis in different economic strata: a community survey from South India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2007, 11 (9): 1042-1045.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    StataCorp: Stata Survey Data Reference Manual, Release 13. 2013, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Malmborg R, Mann G, Thomson R, Squire SB: Can public-private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection among the poor and vulnerable?. Bull World Health Organ. 2006, 84 (9): 752-758.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Pantoja A, Floyd K, Unnikrishnan KP, Jitendra R, Padma MR, Lal SS, Uplekar M, Chauhan LS, Kumar P, Sahu S, Wares F, Lönnroth K: Economic evaluation of public-private mix for tuberculosis care and control, India. Part I. Socio-economic profile and costs among tuberculosis patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009, 13 (6): 698-704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Udwadia ZF, Pinto LM, Uplekar MW: Tuberculosis management by private practitioners in Mumbai, India: has anything changed in two decades?. PLoS One. 2010, 5 (8): e12023-10.1371/journal.pone.0012023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lonnroth K, Aung T, Maung W, Kluge H, Uplekar M: Social franchising of TB care through private GPs in Myanmar: an assessment of treatment results, access, equity and financial protection. Health Policy Plann. 2007, 22 (3): 156-166. 10.1093/heapol/czm007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Munro SA, Lewin SA, Smith HJ, Engel ME, Fretheim A, Volmink J: Patient adherence to tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (7): e238-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Kliiman K, Altraja A: Predictors and mortality associated with treatment default in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010, 14 (4): 454-463.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Garrido Mda S, Penna ML, Perez-Porcuna TM, de Souza AB, Marreiro Lda S, Albuquerque BC, Martinez-Espinosa FE, Buhrer-Sekula S: Factors associated with tuberculosis treatment default in an endemic area of the Brazilian Amazon: a case control-study. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (6): e39134-10.1371/journal.pone.0039134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2006, RNTCP Status Report. 2006, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2007, RNTCP Status Report. 2007, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2008, RNTCP Status Report. 2008, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2009, RNTCP Status Report. 2009, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2010, RNTCP Status Report. 2010, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Central TB Division DGoHS, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: TB India 2011, Revised National TB COntrol Programme Annual Status Report. 2011, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Chauhan LS, Agarwal SP: The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme 23. Tuberculosis Control in India. Edited by: Agarwal SP, Chauhan LS. 2005, Delhi: Central TB Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Directorate General of Health Services

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    World Health Organization: Tuberculosis guidelines, Fourth edition. 2010, Geneva: The World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references


The authors wish to thank the entire research team at COHESIVE-India ( This work was supported by the National Institutes on Aging at the National Institutes of Health [K01-AG037593 to J.D.G.-F.]; by Stanford University’s Freeman Spogli Institute’s Underdevelopment Action Fund [grant to J.D.G.-F.]; and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [383-3040].

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert.

Additional information

Competing interests

Authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Authors’ contributions

KSB participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and helped to draft the manuscript. SS participated in the statistical analysis and helped draft the manuscript. JGF conceived of the study, participated in its design, coordinated and participated in the statistical analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Table S1: Linear Probability Model of Treatment Discontinuation. (DOCX 17 KB)

Additional file 2: Table S2: Likelihood of Treatment Discontinuation <16 Weeks after Treatment Initiation: Logistic Regression Results. (DOCX 18 KB)

Additional file 3: Table S3: Linear Probability Model of Treatment Discontinuation <16 Weeks after Treatment Initiation. (DOCX 18 KB)

Additional file 4: Table S4: Likelihood of Symptom Persistence (Symptoms at 25 Weeks after Treatment Initiation): Logistic Regression Results. (DOCX 35 KB)

Additional file 5: Table S5: Negative Binomial Model of Number of Symptoms Presenting 25 Weeks After Initiating Treatment. (DOCX 37 KB)

Additional file 6: Table S6: Likelihood of Symptom Persistence 16 Weeks after Treatment Initiation: Logistic Regression Results. (DOCX 18 KB)

Additional file 7: Share of Patients Ending Treatment by Category II Treatment Phase.(DOCX 38 KB)

Additional file 8: Case Detection Proportions Reported by RNTCP.(DOCX 74 KB)

Additional file 9: 3 Month Case Conversion Rate for Bihar Reported by RNTCP.(DOCX 75 KB)

Additional file 10: Cure Rate Reported by RNTCP.(DOCX 67 KB)

Additional file 11: Default Rates Reported by RNTCP, Bihar.(DOCX 72 KB)

Additional file 12: Table S7: Treatment Default Prior to 8 Months Among Previously Treated Patients. (DOCX 17 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 3

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Babiarz, K.S., Suen, S. & Goldhaber-Fiebert, J.D. Tuberculosis treatment discontinuation and symptom persistence: an observational study of Bihar, India’s public care system covering >100,000,000 inhabitants. BMC Public Health 14, 418 (2014).

Download citation


  • Tuberculosis
  • Treatment discontinuation
  • Treatment default
  • Symptom persistence
  • Treatment duration
  • India