Skip to main content

Lead, mercury and cadmium in umbilical cord blood and its association with parental epidemiological variables and birth factors



In Spain, few studies have evaluated prenatal exposure to heavy metals. The objective of this study was to describe lead, mercury and cadmium concentrations in blood from a sample of newborn–mother-father trios, as well as to investigate the association between metals in cord blood and parental variables. We also explored the relationship between cord blood metal concentrations and child characteristics at birth.


Metal correlations among family members were assessed using Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Linear regression was used to explore the association between parental variables and log-transformed cord blood lead and cord blood mercury concentrations. In the case of cadmium, tobit regression was used due to the existence of samples below the detection limit. The association between cord blood metal concentrations and child characteristics at birth was evaluated using linear regression.


Geometric means for lead, mercury and cadmium were 14.09 μg/L, 6.72 μg/L and 0.27 μg/L in newborns; 19.80 μg/L, 3.90 μg/L and 0.53 μg/L in pregnant women; and 33.00 μg/L, 5.38 μg/L and 0.49 μg/L in men. Positive correlations were found between metal concentrations among members of the trio. Lead and cadmium concentrations were 15% and 22% higher in newborns from mothers who smoked during pregnancy, while mercury concentrations were 25% higher in newborns from mothers with greater fish intake. Cord-blood lead levels showed seasonal periodicity, with lower concentrations observed in winter. Cord blood cadmium concentrations over 0.29 μg/L were associated with lower 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores.


These results reinforce the need to establish biomonitoring programs in Spain, and provide support for tobacco smoke and fish consumption as important preventable sources of heavy metal exposure in newborns. Additionally, our findings support the hypothesis that cadmium exposure might be deleterious to fetal development.

Peer Review reports


Heavy metal exposure during pregnancy is potentially harmful to the developing fetus. Lead and methylmercury easily cross the placenta and the fetal blood-brain barrier, and can irreversibly affect cognitive development [15]. Lead exposure can also cause spontaneous abortions [6], congenital malformations [7], reduced birth weight [8] and length [9], gestational hypertension [10] or impaired neurodevelopment [11]. Occupational exposure to mercury has been associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension [5], low birth weight [12] and birth defects [13]. Cadmium exposure is also of great concern, due to its possible effects on foetal health. Although the placenta acts as a barrier, protecting the foetus from cadmium exposure by increasing metallothionein expression [14], this metal can be found in cord blood and has been associated with decreased birth weight [15], premature delivery [16] and altered thyroid hormone status of newborns [17].

Exposure to mercury mainly occurs through ingestion of contaminated fish (methylmercury) [18] or dental amalgams (inorganic mercury) [19]. Sources of lead include leaded gasoline, lead paint hazards (including lead in paint, dust and soil), water carried out in lead pipes, industrial emissions or occupational exposures [20]. Because lead is accumulated in maternal bones and released into blood during pregnancy [21], blood lead in pregnant women can be indicative of current or past maternal lead exposure. Environmental cadmium pollution is ubiquitous owing to industrial activities, use of phosphate fertilisers, combustion of motor fuels in vehicles and particles released by tyre wear, all of which result in emissions to air, soil and water [2224]. In non-smokers diet is the most important source of cadmium exposure. In smokers, tobacco is the most important source, since tobacco, like other plants, takes up cadmium, which is afterwards inhaled in the smoke [25].

This report is part of the BioMadrid Project, a cross-sectional biomonitoring study designed to assess environmental exposure to different pollutants in children born in the Madrid Autonomous Region, and their parents. We here present the first Spanish report on heavy metal concentrations in blood samples from newborns, pregnant women and their partners. BioMadrid allows studying the association between certain epidemiological maternal factors and cord blood metals’ concentration. We also explore the possible relationship between cord blood metals and certain birth factors (gestational age, birth weight and length, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores).


Subjects and data-collection

The BioMadrid Project was a biomonitoring pilot study covering a sample of father-pregnant woman-newborn trios residing in two areas of the Madrid Autonomous Region, namely, a municipal district in the city of Madrid (urban area) and a second zone lying in the Greater Madrid Metropolitan Belt (metropolitan area). These two areas, similar in terms of population size, are representative of the two main types of urban environments in the region. The project recruited 145 triplets. Both the design and field work have been described in detail elsewhere [26]. Briefly, all pregnant women residing in the study areas and attending childbirth preparation classes in the public health care system were invited, along with their respective partners, to take part in the study, until the selected sample size was attained. Recruitment lasted from October 2003 to May 2004. No exclusions were made in terms of parents’ or newborns’ disease, ethnicity or place of origin. For logistical reasons, women were required to be aged over 15 years, to be expecting a single pregnancy, and to intend to deliver their babies at the public hospital assigned to them. Exclusions were made if they had received any blood transfusions in the previous year or if they had resided for less than one year in the study area.

Midwives scheduled a date for both parents to collect blood samples (30 ml), coinciding with the programmed control of the pregnant women and supplied the mothers a newborn sampling kit, which included pre-labeled tubes for cord-blood collection. Trained personnel interviewed both parents at their home to complete both an epidemiological questionnaire (socio-demographic factors, environmental and occupational exposures. In addition, they also filled a previously validated food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ)). The FFQ, a modified version of the Harvard questionnaire adapted for use in adult Spanish populations, was used to assess the usual dietary intake over the previous months [27]. The nine possible answers range from “never or less than once a month” to “six or more times per day”. Intake frequencies are combined with standard portion sizes and converted into average daily intake for each food group and participant. In 135 couples we had complete information, with blood samples, epidemiological and dietary questionnaire from both parents.

At delivery, mothers should give the midwives the newborn kit. If feasible, a specimen of cord-blood (12.5 ml) was drawn immediately after birth (N = 114). Logistical problems (births at non-participant hospitals due to overcrowded maternal wards in the reference centers, mothers who forgot the kit, problems to draw blood from the umbilical cord vein and samples stored incorrectly) or problems at delivery (one child was born dead and in three cases an emergency cesarean section was needed), precluded the availability of cord blood in the other trios.

During hospitalization, a protocoled clinical examination of the newborns was performed. Anthropometric data were measured once, before breastfeeding started. Infants were weighed without diapers and using an electronic digital infant scale. Length was measured in the supine position, using a stadiometer composed of a stationary head-board and a movable footboard. Knees and hips were extended using gentle force and the footboard pressed against the balls of the feet. The Apgar score was measured on a scale from 1 to 10, at 1 and 5 minutes after delivery. Infants were evaluated on a scale of 0 to 2 according to five categories (skin color, muscle tone, reflexes, respiratory effort and heart rate), and the points from each category added together to determine the total score.

In this study we first described metal levels in all BioMadrid participants with blood samples available (140 mothers, 140 fathers and 114 children). We then excluded trios with no cord-blood samples available or with problems at delivery, trios where at least one member had no metal determinations, and trios where at least one adult had not completed the epidemiological questionnaire, leading to a final sample of 112 complete trios. Finally, in the sub-sample of trios with all information available, we evaluated the possible associations between parental factors, umbilical cord blood metal levels and newborn’s characteristics at birth.


Total lead and cadmium concentrations were determined using a Perkin Elmer Analyst 600 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Hispania, Madrid, Spain), fitted with a transversely heated graphite atomizer furnace assembly and longitudinal Zeeman-effect background correction. Mercury was measured by a Perkin Elmer FIMS-400 Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (Perkin Elmer Hispania, Madrid, Spain) using the cold vapor technique (Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometer). We used mercury as a reliable measure of methylmercury because it has been reported that when mercury concentrations are as high as those found in our study, methylmercury accounts for up to 90% of mercury [28].

Detection limits were as follows: 1.70 μg/L for lead, 0.12 μg/L for mercury and 0.25 μg/L for cadmium. For lead and mercury all values exceeded the limit of detection. For cadmium, 47% of samples in cord blood and 15% of samples in peripheral blood had concentrations below 0.25 μg/L. Lyophilised control material SeronormTM (Trace Elements Whole Blood 2, SERO, Billingstand, Norway) was used to verify the precision and accuracy of the analytical measurements. The coefficients of variation for the three metals were less than 5%. In all cases, analyses were performed after the correct values had been confirmed by the instrumentation.

Statistical analysis

Cadmium values below the detection limit were replaced by half the detection limit for statistical analysis [29]. Differences in the distribution of heavy metals between samples were visually examined using box-plots. Spearman test was used to assess metals’ correlations among members of the trio.

Geometric means and 95% confidence intervals, as well as 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles, were calculated for the three metals in maternal, paternal and umbilical cord blood. Also, geometric means and 95% confidence intervals were computed for cord blood concentrations by parental characteristics. For lead and mercury, the ratio of geometric means across categories of parental characteristics was estimated by fitting multivariable linear regression models, introducing the log-transformed metal concentration as the dependent variable and adjusting for potential confounders previously described in the literature: parental age (continuous), living region (metropolitan/urban) and educational level (< high school/high school/>high school). Mercury models were also adjusted for fish consumption (grams/day). In a second step, lead models were further adjusted for cord-blood sampling season according to date of birth and for maternal tobacco smoke, with similar results (data not shown). The estimated beta coefficients and standard errors of the models were exponentiated to show the results in a more easily understandable way.

Due to the number of samples with concentration of cadmium below the detection limit, Tobit regression models were fitted to explore differences in cadmium concentrations according to maternal or paternal characteristics. In this method, linear regression is applied to non-censored continuous data, conditional on an assumed influence on censored data, and although the coefficients can be interpreted in similar manner to what we have explained for lineal regression models, caution should be taken as the lineal effect is on the uncensored latent variable and not on the observed outcome [30]. Tobit models were also adjusted for potential confounders: age, living region, educational level and parental smoking habits (never-smoked/quitted before pregnancy/smoked during pregnancy).

Finally, multivariable lineal regression models were fitted to study the relationship between cord blood metal levels and newborn’s anthropometric measures and Apgar scores. For this purpose, cord blood metal concentrations were dichotomized at the median (13.8 μg/L for lead, 7.7 μg/L for mercury, and 0.29 μg/L for cadmium). These models were adjusted for maternal age, newborn’s sex and gestational age, since these factors are known to influence birth outcomes; as well as for those variables associated with metal levels in our population (maternal tobacco smoking and sampling season for lead, fish consumption for mercury and maternal tobacco smoking for cadmium).

Ethical considerations

All participants signed an informed consent document which included information on their statutory rights to confidentiality and protection of personal data. The study protocol was formally approved by the Ethics Committee of the Carlos III Institute of Health, in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration.


Table 1 presents the main descriptive statistics for lead, mercury and cadmium in all study participants. Lead and cadmium levels were lower in umbilical cord blood than in parental blood, while mercury levels showed the highest concentrations in children. In fathers, geometric mean lead and mercury levels were higher than those of mothers.

Table 1 Heavy metal levels in all BioMadrid participants with blood samples and metal determinations available

Significant positive correlations were found between lead, mercury and cadmium concentrations in maternal and umbilical cord blood (rPb=0.40, p < 0.001; rHg=0.57, p < 0.001; rCd = 0.25, p < 0.001), and between lead and mercury concentrations in paternal and umbilical cord blood (rPb=0.27, p < 0.001; rHg=0.43, p < 0.001). Metal concentrations were also correlated among parents (rPb = 0.27, p < 0.001; rHg = 0.63, p < 0.05 and rCd = 0.37, p < 0.001). Interestingly, no correlation was seen between cadmium concentrations in paternal and umbilical blood.

Tables 2 and 3 present cord blood metal levels by parental characteristics in those children for which both parents provided epidemiological data. The mean age was 31.1 years for mothers and 32.0 for fathers. Regarding ethnicity, 76% of women and 84% of men were Caucasians. Place of residence was almost equally divided between the two study areas and participants reported living in the same home for an average of 10.2 years (95% CI: 8.79-11.62). While approximately 61% of women and 69% of men were passively exposed to tobacco smoke in the workplace or at home, 16% of women and 33% of men actively smoked during pregnancy. Among smokers, the median number of cigarettes smoked during pregnancy was 4 cig/day (SD: 2.8) for women, and 14 cig/day (SD: 8.4) for men. Pregnant women and their partners consumed a median of 76 and 79 grams of fish per day, respectively. No parents were occupationally exposed to mercury.

Table 2 Lead, mercury and cadmium concentrations (μg/L) in umbilical cord, overall and by maternal epidemiological characteristics
Table 3 Lead, mercury and cadmium concentrations (μg/L) in umbilical cord, overall and by paternal epidemiological characteristics

After multivariable adjustment, blood lead and cadmium concentrations were 15% and 22% higher in cord blood from newborns whose mothers smoked during pregnancy. Children whose mothers were passively exposed to tobacco smoke also presented higher blood lead concentrations, although the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, cord-blood lead levels were lower among children born in winter (data not shown). Mercury concentrations were 25% higher in cord blood from mothers with greater fish intake (>100 g/day) (Table 2). Similarly, paternal fish consumption was associated with mercury levels in newborns; while fish intake showed a strong correlation among parents (r = 0.59, p < 0.01). No other paternal factors were associated with cord blood metals’ concentrations (Table 3).

Mean gestational age was 39.1 weeks and 5 children were born prematurely (<37 weeks). Mean weight at birth was 3282 grams. All children had Apgar scores over 5. Newborns with cadmium concentrations over 0.29 μg/L had lower 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores compared to those with lower concentrations (Table 4). No associations were observed between metal levels and newborn’s weight or length.

Table 4 Mean (SD) birth weight, birth length, 1-minute and 5-minutes Apgar scores, and their association with umbilical cord blood mercury, lead and cadmium levels

Discussion and conclusion

In Spain, few studies have evaluated prenatal exposure to heavy metals. Our results are the first to provide information on blood metal concentrations in a sample of father-mother-newborn trios in the Madrid Autonomous Region, and can serve as a reference for monitoring metal levels in our environment.

The cord blood lead levels found in our study were similar to those observed in newborns from other European countries during the same period [31, 32], with only one child showing lead concentrations above the present CDC reference level of 50 μg/L (CDC., 2012). A previous study in the Spanish city of Barcelona showed a reduction on cord blood lead concentrations from 186 μg/L in 1984 to 40.06 μg/L in 1995, parallel to the decrease in lead petrol concentrations in the ambient air [33]. Umbilical cord lead concentrations from our study are consistent with this dramatic decrease and reflect the success of banning leaded gasoline in Spain. Moreover, a recently published study analysing lead concentrations in cord samples collected between 2004 and 2008 in 4 different Spanish cities found a mean concentration of 10 μg/L, suggesting that blood lead levels are still declining in our country [34].

For mercury, more than 70% of our children exceeded the concentration of 5.8 μg/L which has been established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as associated with possible health effects [35]. Similar findings have been previously described in other Mediterranean countries including Spain [36] and are attributed to maternal consumption of fish species high in mercury. Regarding cadmium, though its levels were similar to those reported by other European countries during the same period [31, 37, 38], 29% of children surpassed the reference level of 0.5 μg/L established by the Human Biomonitoring Commission of the German Federal Environmental Agency for children [39].

In fathers, blood lead and cadmium levels were comparable to those found in men from the general population in Germany [40] or France [41] and can be considered relatively low. In this regard, no men showed blood cadmium levels above the limit of 5 μg/L established by the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the United States [42], and only one presented blood lead levels above 100 μg/L. Conversely, mercury concentrations were considerably high [43, 44]. When referring to pregnant women, inter-study comparisons were limited by the relative scarcity of studies investigating this particular group, heterogeneity in the presentation of results and differences in metal concentrations stemming from the point in time when samples are collected. Limiting our comparisons to women at around 38 weeks of pregnancy, lead and cadmium concentrations were also similar to those found in other studies [45, 46], while again mercury concentrations were much higher [45].

The positive correlations found for lead and mercury between maternal and cord blood, evidence the diffusion of these metals across the placental barrier. In the case of cadmium, the lower correlations observed reflect the efficiency of the placenta as a barrier against the passage of this metal [14]. Mercury concentrations were higher in newborns than in their mothers. This has been previously reported in the literature [47, 48] and attributed to the high affinity of methlymercury to haemoglobin [49], as haemoglobin concentrations are much higher in cord blood than in maternal peripheral blood. Lead and cadmium concentrations were 60% and 54% of the concentration in maternal blood.

Consistent with previous studies [50, 51], children from smoking mothers showed higher blood lead and cadmium concentrations, particularly among current smokers. Blood lead levels were also higher in newborns whose mothers were passively exposed to tobacco smoke, supporting the role of passive smoking as an important determinant of blood lead in children [52]. Additionally, umbilical cord lead levels showed seasonal periodicity. Regarding mercury, both maternal and paternal fish consumption were associated with its levels in umbilical cord blood. However, because fish intake was highly correlated among parents, the results observed in fathers probably reflect the underlying association between maternal fish consumption and cord blood mercury. No other studied parental socio-demographic or environmental factors were associated with metal levels in cord blood.

Exposure to heavy metals in women and men of reproductive ages is an issue of current concern, since the evidence is rising that even low levels of exposure to these compounds can affect fetal growth and development [53, 54]. Exposure to maternal lead during pregnancy has been proposed as a risk factor for reduced fetal growth [55, 56]. However, studies estimating newborn’s exposure through cord blood [53, 5759] have found contradictory results, suggesting that the possible effects of this metal on newborn’s health could depend on the dose [60] or on the timing of exposure [61]. At similar cord blood lead concentrations as those observed in BioMadrid, various reports have also failed to find associations with the studied outcomes [37, 60].

Investigations evaluating the possible effects of in-utero exposure to mercury on fetal growth are limited and have yielded inconsistent results [45, 62]. Some of these studies have shown an inverse association between cord blood mercury and fetal growth [12, 63] or the Apgar scores [60]. Differences between reports have been recently attributed to maternal fish consumption habits, as many species contain beneficial nutrients that can compensate mercury toxic effects [12]. In this regard, a cohort study of pregnant women in England has shown a reverse association between maternal lean and oily fish intake and the risk of intrauterine growth retardation [64], while fatty fish consumption has been related with decreased fetal growth [65]. Unfortunately, we could not evaluate if the results observed in our study varied by type of fish consumed, due to a lack of statistical power. Overall, our findings do not support an association between total mercury in cord blood and fetal health.

Although there is epidemiological evidence that in utero exposure to cadmium may have detrimental effects on newborn’s health [15, 16, 6669], the evidence at relatively low levels of exposure as those observed in BioMadrid is scarce. At comparable cadmium levels, studies evaluating the association between cord blood cadmium concentrations and fetal growth have found inconsistent results, with some suggesting possible deleterious effects [66] while others do not [37]. In our study, umbilical cadmium was not associated with fetal growth, but newborns with cadmium concentrations over 0.29 μg/L had lower 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores compared to those with lower concentrations. Apgar scoring allows evaluating the condition of infants immediately after birth [70]. Additionally, there is evidence that lower 5-minute Apgar scores at birth may be associated with lower survival and neurological outcomes at one year of age [71] and during early adulthood [72, 73]. To our knowledge only two studies have previously evaluated the association between cord blood cadmium concentrations and Apgar scores [60, 74]. Mokhtar et al. first reported a negative correlation between umbilical cadmium and the 5-minute Apgar score, in 100 Egyptian newborns with a mean cord blood cadmium level of 0.66 μg/L. Subsequently, a recent study by Al-Saleh et al. based on 1578 babies with a mean cord blood cadmium concentration of 0.78 μg/L showed that newborns with Apgar 5-minutes scores below the 10th percentile (0-8) had higher levels of umbilical cord blood cadmium. Interestingly, our results are consistent with these findings within a substantially lower cadmium concentration range. Although the underlying biological mechanisms explaining this association remain unclear, the potential clinical implications of this finding warrants further evaluation.

Our study has some limitations, including its sample size and the representativeness of the study sample [26]. The decision to study women who intended to give birth in a public hospital implied the exclusion of a proportion of couples with private insurance and, in all likelihood, higher income. However, in Spain there is a National Health System which provides universal and free health care, and the percentage of women in fertile ages who have private insurance is relatively low (around 10% during the study period [75]). Additionally, account must be taken of the fact that the design selected fertile couples in the third trimester of pregnancy, which means that if metals affect fertility or shorten pregnancy length, the concentration in our adult sample may be underestimating the levels in the general population. Another issue of concern is the high percentage of cord blood samples with cadmium values under the detection limit. To solve this problem, we opted for using Tobit regression analysis, a method for modelling continuous variables where a large number of observations are censored at a single value [30, 76], which in our case corresponded to the limit of detection. Also, anthropometric measurements were performed only one time on infants, resulting in a potential source of measurement error. However, the complexity of the field work, carried out within the public health system, did not allow for collection of additional measurements. Finally, there is the possibility of residual confounding by factors not completely controlled for by the variables included in the analyses.

Our results reinforce the need to establishing biomonitoring programs in our country, while provide support for tobacco smoke and fish consumption as important sources of heavy metal exposure in newborns. Because of the potential deleterious effects of metal exposure on newborns health, more efforts should be made to recommend mothers to quit smoking and reduce mercury intake by choosing low-mercury fish during pregnancy.


  1. 1.

    Cohen JT, Bellinger DC, Shaywitz BA: A quantitative analysis of prenatal methyl mercury exposure and cognitive development. Am J Prev Med. 2005, 29: 353-365. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sanders T, Liu Y, Buchner V, Tchounwou PB: Neurotoxic effects and biomarkers of lead exposure: a review. Rev Environ Health. 2009, 24: 15-45.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Roosli M: Non-cancer effects of chemical agents on children’s health. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011, 107: 315-322. 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Julvez J, Grandjean P: Neurodevelopmental toxicity risks due to occupational exposure to industrial chemicals during pregnancy. Ind Health. 2009, 47: 459-468. 10.2486/indhealth.47.459.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pan J, Song H, Pan XC: Reproductive effects of occupational exposure to mercury on female workers in China: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2007, 28: 1215-1218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Borja-Aburto VH, Hertz-Picciotto I, Rojas LM, Farias P, Rios C, Blanco J: Blood lead levels measured prospectively and risk of spontaneous abortion. Am J Epidemiol. 1999, 150: 590-597. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010057.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Needleman HL, Rabinowitz M, Leviton A, Linn S, Schoenbaum S: The relationship between prenatal exposure to lead and congenital anomalies. JAMA. 1984, 251: 2956-2959. 10.1001/jama.1984.03340460034021.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Bellinger DC: Teratogen update: lead and pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005, 73: 409-420. 10.1002/bdra.20127.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hernandez-Avila M, Peterson KE, Gonzalez-Cossio T, Sanin LH, Aro A, Schnaas L, Hu H: Effect of maternal bone lead on length and head circumference of newborns and 1-month-old infants. Arch Environ Health. 2002, 57: 482-488. 10.1080/00039890209601441.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kennedy DA, Woodland C, Koren G: Lead exposure, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: a systematic review of cause and effect. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012, 32: 512-517. 10.3109/01443615.2012.693987.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bellinger D, Leviton A, Needleman HL, Waternaux C, Rabinowitz M: Low-level lead exposure and infant development in the first year. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1986, 8: 151-161.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ramon R, Ballester F, Aguinagalde X, Amurrio A, Vioque J, Lacasana M, Rebagliato M, Murcia M, Iniguez C: Fish consumption during pregnancy, prenatal mercury exposure, and anthropometric measures at birth in a prospective mother-infant cohort study in Spain. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009, 90: 1047-1055. 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27944.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jin L, Zhang L, Li Z, Liu JM, Ye R, Ren A: Placental concentrations of mercury, lead, cadmium, and arsenic and the risk of neural tube defects in a Chinese population. Reprod Toxicol. 2013, 35: 25-31.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McAleer MF, Tuan RS: Metallothionein overexpression in human trophoblastic cells protects against cadmium-induced apoptosis. In Vitr Mol Toxicol. 2001, 14: 25-42. 10.1089/109793301316882522.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang YL, Zhao YC, Wang JX, Zhu HD, Liu QF, Fan YG, Wang NF, Zhao JH, Liu HS, Ou-Yang L, et al: Effect of environmental exposure to cadmium on pregnancy outcome and fetal growth: a study on healthy pregnant women in China. J Environ Sci Health Part A Toxic/hazardous Substances Environ Eng. 2004, 39: 2507-2515. 10.1081/ESE-200026331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nishijo M, Nakagawa H, Honda R, Tanebe K, Saito S, Teranishi H, Tawara K: Effects of maternal exposure to cadmium on pregnancy outcome and breast milk. Occup Environ Med. 2002, 59: 394-396. 10.1136/oem.59.6.394.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Iijima K, Otake T, Yoshinaga J, Ikegami M, Suzuki E, Naruse H, Yamanaka T, Shibuya N, Yasumizu T, Kato N: Cadmium, lead, and selenium in cord blood and thyroid hormone status of newborns. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007, 119: 10-18. 10.1007/s12011-007-0057-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bjornberg KA, Vahter M, Petersson-Grawe K, Glynn A, Cnattingius S, Darnerud PO, Atuma S, Aune M, Becker W, Berglund M: Methyl mercury and inorganic mercury in Swedish pregnant women and in cord blood: influence of fish consumption. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 637-641. 10.1289/ehp.5618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dorea JG, Barbosa AC: Maternal mercury transfer. Environ Res. 2003, 93: 113-114. 10.1016/S0013-9351(02)00095-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tong S, Von Schirnding YE, Prapamontol T: Environmental lead exposure: a public health problem of global dimensions. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 1068-1077.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tellez-Rojo MM, Hernandez-Avila M, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Smith D, Hernandez-Cadena L, Mercado A, Aro A, Schwartz J, Hu H: Impact of bone lead and bone resorption on plasma and whole blood lead levels during pregnancy. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 160: 668-678. 10.1093/aje/kwh271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    ATSDR: Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2011, Available at:,

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pan J, Plant JA, Voulvoulis N, Oates CJ, Ihlenfeld C: Cadmium levels in Europe: implications for human health. Environ Geochem Health. 2010, 32: 1-12. 10.1007/s10653-009-9273-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sanchez-Martin MJ, Sanchez-Camazano M, Lorenzo LF: Cadmium and lead contents in suburban and urban soils from two medium-sized cities of Spain: influence of traffic intensity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000, 64: 250-257. 10.1007/s001289910037.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Satarug S, Garrett SH, Sens MA, Sens DA: Cadmium, environmental exposure, and health outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 2010, 118: 182-190.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aragones N, Perez-Gomez B, Astray J, Gil E, Perez-Meixeira AM, de Paz C, Iriso A, Cisneros M, de Santos A, Arias P, et al: Biomonitoring of exposure to environmental pollutants in newborns and their parents in Madrid, Spain (BioMadrid): study design and field work results. Gac Sanit. 2008, 22: 483-491. 10.1157/13126931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Vioque J: Nutrición y Salud Pública. Edited by: Serra LL, Aranceta J. 2006, Barcelona: Masson, 199-207. Validez de la evaluación de la ingesta dietética, Métodos, bases científicas y aplicaciones.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mahaffey KR, Clickner RP, Bodurow CC: Blood organic mercury and dietary mercury intake: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 and 2000. Environ Health Perspect. 2004, 112: 562-570.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hewett P, Ganser GH: A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007, 51: 611-632. 10.1093/annhyg/mem045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bleda Hernandez MJ, Tobias Garces A: Application of tobit regression models in modelling censored epidemiological variables. Gac Sanit. 2002, 16: 195-10.1016/S0213-9111(02)71652-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Koppen G, Den HE, Nelen V, Van de Mieroop E, Bruckers L, Bilau M, Keune H, Van LN, Covaci A, Van De Weghe H, et al: Organochlorine and heavy metals in newborns: results from the flemish environment and health survey (FLEHS 2002-2006). Environ Int. 2009, 35: 1015-1022. 10.1016/j.envint.2009.05.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Yazbeck C, Cheymol J, Dandres AM, Barbery-Courcoux AL: Lead exposure in pregnant women and newborns: a screening update. Arch Pediatr. 2007, 14: 15-19. 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.09.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Torra M, Rodamilans M, Montero F, Farre C, Corbella J: Exposure to lead among the population of Barcelona: chronologic trends from 1984 to 1995. Med Clin (Barc ). 1997, 108: 601-603.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Llop S, Aguinagalde X, Vioque J, Ibarluzea J, Guxens M, Casas M, Murcia M, Ruiz M, Amurrio A, Rebagliato M, et al: Prenatal exposure to lead in Spain: cord blood levels and associated factors. Sci Total Environ. 2011, 409: 2298-2305. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    EPA: Toxicity and Exposure Assessment for Children’s Health. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Organic mercury. 2007, Available at:,

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ramon R, Murcia M, Aguinagalde X, Amurrio A, Llop S, Ibarluzea J, Lertxundi A, Alvarez-Pedrerol M, Casas M, Vioque J, et al: Prenatal mercury exposure in a multicenter cohort study in Spain. Environ Int. 2011, 37: 597-604. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.12.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Durska G: Levels of lead and cadmium in pregnant women and newborns and evaluation of their impact on child development. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2001, 47: 49-60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Salpietro CD, Gangemi S, Minciullo PL, Briuglia S, Merlino MV, Stelitano A, Cristani M, Trombetta D, Saija A: Cadmium concentration in maternal and cord blood and infant birth weight: a study on healthy non-smoking women. J Perinatal Med. 2002, 30: 395-399.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wilhelm M, Schulz C, Schwenk M: Revised and new reference values for arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury in blood or urine of children: basis for validation of human biomonitoring data in environmental medicine. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006, 209: 301-305.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schulz C, Conrad A, Becker K, Kolossa-Gehring M, Seiwert M, Seifert B: Twenty years of the German environmental survey (GerES): human biomonitoring–temporal and spatial (West Germany/East Germany) differences in population exposure. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007, 210: 271-297. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2007.01.034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Falq G, Zeghnoun A, Pascal M, Vernay M, Le SY, Garnier R, Olichon D, Bretin P, Castetbon K, Frery N: Blood lead levels in the adult population living in France the French Nutrition and Health Survey (ENNS 2006-2007). Environ Int. 2011, 37: 565-571. 10.1016/j.envint.2010.11.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    OSHA: Occupational safety and health administration. occupational safety and health standards: toxic substances: cadmium. Code Fed Regul. 2003, 29: 135-229.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Batariova A, Spevackova V, Benes B, Cejchanova M, Smid J, Cerna M: Blood and urine levels of Pb, Cd and Hg in the general population of the Czech Republic and proposed reference values. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006, 209: 359-366. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.02.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Butler WJ, Houseman J, Seddon L, McMullen E, Tofflemire K, Mills C, Corriveau A, Weber JP, LeBlanc A, Walker M, et al: Maternal and umbilical cord blood levels of mercury, lead, cadmium, and essential trace elements in Arctic Canada. Environ Res. 2006, 100: 295-318. 10.1016/j.envres.2005.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gundacker C, Frohlich S, Graf-Rohrmeister K, Eibenberger B, Jessenig V, Gicic D, Prinz S, Wittmann KJ, Zeisler H, Vallant B, et al: Perinatal lead and mercury exposure in Austria. Sci Total Environ. 2010, 408: 5744-5749. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.079.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hu H, Tellez-Rojo MM, Bellinger D, Smith D, Ettinger AS, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Schwartz J, Schnaas L, Mercado-Garcia A, Hernandez-Avila M: Fetal lead exposure at each stage of pregnancy as a predictor of infant mental development. Environ Health Perspect. 2006, 114: 1730-1735.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stern AH, Smith AE: An assessment of the cord blood:maternal blood methylmercury ratio: implications for risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2003, 111: 1465-1470. 10.1289/ehp.6187.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vahter M, Akesson A, Lind B, Bjors U, Schutz A, Berglund M: Longitudinal study of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in blood and urine of pregnant and lactating women, as well as in umbilical cord blood. Environ Res. 2000, 84: 186-194. 10.1006/enrs.2000.4098.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Doi R, Kasamo M, Ishikawa M, Shimizu T: Factors influencing placental transfer of methylmercury in man. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1984, 33: 69-77. 10.1007/BF01625513.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chelchowska M, Jablonka-Salach K, Ambroszkiewicz J, Maciejewski T, Gajewska J, Bulska E, Laskowska-Klita T, Leibschang J, Barciszewski J: Effect of cigarette smoking on blood lead levels in pregnant women. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2012, 16: 196-204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sikorski R, Radomanski T, Paszkowski T, Skoda J: Smoking during pregnancy and the perinatal cadmium burden. J Perinat Med. 1988, 16: 225-231. 10.1515/jpme.1988.16.3.225.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Apostolou A, Garcia-Esquinas E, Fadrowski JJ, McLain P, Weaver VM, Navas-Acien A: Secondhand tobacco smoke: a source of lead exposure in US children and adolescents. Am J Publ Health. 2012, 102: 714-722. 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Xie X, Ding G, Cui C, Chen L, Gao Y, Zhou Y, Shi R, Tian Y: The effects of low-level prenatal lead exposure on birth outcomes. Environ Pollut. 2013, 175: 30-34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Valent F, Horvat M, Sofianou-Katsoulis A, Spiric Z, Mazej D, Little D, Prasouli A, Mariuz M, Tamburlini G, Nakou S, et al: Neurodevelopmental effects of low-level prenatal mercury exposure from maternal fish consumption in a Mediterranean cohort: study rationale and design. J Epidemiol. 2013, 23 (2): 146-152. 10.2188/jea.JE20120030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Irgens A, Kruger K, Skorve AH, Irgens LM: Reproductive outcome in offspring of parents occupationally exposed to lead in Norway. Am J Ind Med. 1998, 34: 431-437. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199811)34:5<431::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-T.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Gonzalez-Cossio T, Peterson KE, Sanin LH, Fishbein E, Palazuelos E, Aro A, Hernandez-Avila M, Hu H: Decrease in birth weight in relation to maternal bone-lead burden. Pediatrics. 1997, 100: 856-862. 10.1542/peds.100.5.856.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Clark AR: Placental transfer of lead and its effects on the newborn. Postgrad Med J. 1977, 53: 674-678. 10.1136/pgmj.53.625.674.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bellinger D, Leviton A, Rabinowitz M, Allred E, Needleman H, Schoenbaum S: Weight gain and maturity in fetuses exposed to low levels of lead. Environ Res. 1991, 54: 151-158. 10.1016/S0013-9351(05)80097-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Satin KP, Neutra RR, Guirguis G, Flessel P: Umbilical cord blood lead levels in California. Arch Environ Health. 1991, 46: 167-173. 10.1080/00039896.1991.9937445.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Al-Saleh I, Shinwari N, Mashhour A, Rabah A: Birth outcome measures and maternal exposure to heavy metals (lead, cadmium and mercury) in Saudi Arabian population. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2013.04.009

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cantonwine D, Hu H, Sanchez BN, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Smith D, Ettinger AS, Mercado-Garcia A, Hernandez-Avila M, Wright RO, Tellez-Rojo MM: Critical windows of fetal lead exposure: adverse impacts on length of gestation and risk of premature delivery. J Occup Environ Med. 2010, 52: 1106-1111. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181f86fee.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    King E, Shih G, Ratnapradipa D, Quilliam DN, Morton J, Magee SR: Mercury, lead, and cadmium in umbilical cord blood. J Environ Health. 2013, 75: 38-43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Oken E, Kleinman KP, Olsen SF, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW: Associations of seafood and elongated n-3 fatty acid intake with fetal growth and length of gestation: results from a US pregnancy cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2004, 160: 774-783. 10.1093/aje/kwh282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Rogers I, Emmett P, Ness A, Golding J: Maternal fish intake in late pregnancy and the frequency of low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation in a cohort of British infants. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 486-492. 10.1136/jech.2003.013565.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Halldorsson TI, Meltzer HM, Thorsdottir I, Knudsen V, Olsen SF: Is high consumption of fatty fish during pregnancy a risk factor for fetal growth retardation? A study of 44,824 Danish pregnant women. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 166: 687-696. 10.1093/aje/kwm133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lin CM, Doyle P, Wang D, Hwang YH, Chen PC: Does prenatal cadmium exposure affect fetal and child growth?. Occup Environ Med. 2011, 68: 641-646. 10.1136/oem.2010.059758.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ronco AM, Arguello G, Suazo M, Llanos MN: Increased levels of metallothionein in placenta of smokers. Toxicology. 2005, 208: 133-139. 10.1016/j.tox.2004.11.016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kippler M, Hoque AM, Raqib R, Ohrvik H, Ekstrom EC, Vahter M: Accumulation of cadmium in human placenta interacts with the transport of micronutrients to the fetus. Toxicol Lett. 2010, 192: 162-168. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.10.018.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Stasenko S, Bradford EM, Piasek M, Henson MC, Varnai VM, Jurasovic J, Kusec V: Metals in human placenta: focus on the effects of cadmium on steroid hormones and leptin. J Appl Toxicol. 2010, 30: 242-253. 10.1002/jat.1490.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Rubarth L: The apgar score: simple yet complex. Neonatal Netw. 2012, 31: 169-177. 10.1891/0730-0832.31.3.169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Juretschke LJ: Apgar scoring: its use and meaning for today’s newborn. Neonatal Netw. 2000, 19: 17-19.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Odd DE, Rasmussen F, Gunnell D, Lewis G, Whitelaw A: A cohort study of low Apgar scores and cognitive outcomes. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008, 93: F115-F120.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Stuart A, Otterblad OP, Kallen K: Apgar scores at 5 minutes after birth in relation to school performance at 16 years of age. Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 118: 201-208. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822200eb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Mokhtar G, Hossny E, el-Awady M, Zekry M: In utero exposure to cadmium pollution in Cairo and Giza governorates of Egypt. East Mediterr Health J. 2002, 8: 254-260.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    ENS: Encuesta Nacional de Salud de España 2001-2003. Utilización de servicios sanitarios y consumo de medicamentos. Cobertura Sanitaria. 2001, Available at:,

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Lubin JH, Colt JS, Camann D, Davis S, Cerhan JR, Severson RK, Bernstein L, Hartge P: Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environ Health Perspect. 2004, 112: 1691-1696. 10.1289/ehp.7199.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Download references

Acknowledgements/grant support

Financial support was obtained from the Madrid Regional Health & Consumer Affairs Authority and the Spanish Health Research Fund (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria [FIS] grant PI040777). Dr. Esther Garcia-Esquinas was supported by a Río Hortega (CM10/00332) research training grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Carlos III Institute of Health). The authors are deeply indebted to the primary-care midwives and health staff of the Gregorio Marañón and Getafe Hospital maternity wards and laboratories, and in particular to the study participants themselves.

Financial support was obtained from the Madrid Regional Health & Consumer Affairs Authority and the Spanish Health Research Fund (Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria [FIS] grant PI040777). Dr. Esther Garcia-Esquinas was supported by a Río Hortega (CM10/00332) research training grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Carlos III Institute of Health). The authors are deeply indebted to the primary-care midwives and health staff of the Gregorio Marañón and Getafe Hospital maternity wards and laboratories, and in particular to the study participants themselves.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Esther García-Esquinas.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Drs. NA, MM, MP, JA, BPG, MC, GLA, AMPM, EG, CP, AI, JCS, AA, AS, JFG, JMGS and JV designed and coordinated the project. Drs. MAF and MJG participated in the design and coordination of the project and also carried out the laboratory analyses. Dr EGE conducted statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. Dr. PFN provided statistical support. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Esquinas, E., Pérez-Gómez, B., Fernández-Navarro, P. et al. Lead, mercury and cadmium in umbilical cord blood and its association with parental epidemiological variables and birth factors. BMC Public Health 13, 841 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Cadmium
  • Lead
  • Mercury
  • Biomarker
  • Environmental pollution
  • Tobacco
  • Pregnancy