Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Factors associated with suicidal behaviors in mainland China: a meta-analysis

BMC Public Health201212:524

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-524

Received: 12 March 2012

Accepted: 29 June 2012

Published: 16 July 2012

Abstract

Background

Suicide is a major public health issue in China. Studies of suicide risk factors have reported both inconsistent and inconclusive results. This review aimed to determine suicide risk factors in China.

Methods

Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and VIP (Chinese Journal of Science and Technology of VIP) were searched for relevant reports. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility of identified studies and extracted data. Pooled odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) were calculated for each factor with Revman 5.0.

Results

Forty-four studies with 192,362 subjects were included. The pooled results indicated that mood disorders and stressful life events (physical illness, suicide of relatives) increased the risk of suicide ideation among the entire population. Socio-family environment (single or remarried parent, study pressure and academic achievement) and unhealthy behaviors (smoking, alcohol drinking, and drug use) were risk factors for suicide ideation among youth. Unhealthy behaviors (smoking and alcohol drinking), mood disorders, and stressful life events (suicide of relatives) were the main risk factors for attempted suicide. Persons living in rural areas, and those with lower education, mood disorders, and/or a history of negative life events had a higher risk of completed suicide. In China, before 2000, females had a significantly higher rate of completed suicide than males, while after 2000, no significant gender difference was found.

Conclusions

Socio-family environment, lifestyle, life events and psychiatric/psychological factors are associated with suicidal behaviors in China. Further case–control or cohort studies are needed to better understand suicide behaviors in China. Meanwhile, there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies of suicide interventions among high-risk populations.

Keywords

Risk factorsSuicideChinaMeta-analysis

Background

Suicide is an important global public health problem. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately one million people committed suicide, and 10–20 times that number attempted suicide worldwide in 2000 [1]. Globally, suicide is one of the three leading causes of death among people aged 15–34 years [2] and suicide rates have increased by 60% over the last 45 years [3]. Reducing mortality and morbidity associated with suicidal behavior is high on the WHO agenda [3].

China has long been recognized as having a high suicide rate, with 21 percent of the world’s population, but 30–40 percent of the world’s suicides [4]. Suicide patterns in China are different from those in the West. Previously in China, females had consistently higher suicide rates than males [5]. However, in recent years, this pattern has reversed. In 2008, the national male suicide rate (7.0/100,000) was higher than the national female suicide rate (6.20/100,000), as was the rural male suicide rate (4.0 vs. 3.18/100,000, respectively) and the urban male suicide rate (8.62 vs. 7.87/100,000, respectively) [5]. The suicide rate in China has substantially decreased over the last 20 years, with the 2008 national suicide rate being approximately 63 percent lower than the 1987 rate (17.65 vs. 6.60/100,00, respectively).

Despite the decreased national suicide rate, suicide is still threatening the health of youth and elderly in China. An understanding of the risk factors is imperative for effective suicide prevention. Suicide risk factors have attracted a great deal of research attention in China. Many studies have investigated the influence of demographic, socio-psychological, economic and lifestyle-related factors, and physical illness on suicidal behavior. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent. For example, some studies found that females had a higher suicide risk than males [6, 7], while others found no significant differences in risk between the sexes [8, 9]. In addition, some studies [10, 12] found no significant association between family type and suicide ideation, while others found that belonging to a remarried [13] or single parent [17] family increased the risk of forming suicide ideation.

This meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively examine the risk factors of completed suicide and suicidality (suicide ideation and suicide attempt) in the Chinese population. From our findings, we were able to draw a series of recommendations for future intervention programs and studies.

Methods

Search strategy

Electronic database and manual searches were conducted to identify published articles for review. Four databases were used to search for articles published up to January, 2011: Medline/PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) and VIP (Chinese Journal of Science and Technology of VIP). The searches applied a mixture of free text and index terms. The search terms in PubMed were ("Suicide"[Mesh] AND "Risk Factors"[Mesh]) AND "China"[Mesh], ("Suicide"[Mesh] AND "China"[Mesh], (("Risk Factors"[Mesh]) AND "Suicidal Ideation"[Mesh]) AND "China"[Mesh], (("Risk Factors"[Mesh]) AND "Suicide, Attempted"[Mesh]) AND "China"[Mesh], risk factor for suicide in China, suicide in China. The results in Medline/PubMed were limited to full text, human, English and Chinese. The EMTREE search in EMBASE was 'suicide'/exp AND 'risk factor'/exp AND 'china'/exp, 'suicide'/exp AND 'china'/exp, 'risk factor'/exp AND 'suicidal ideation'/exp AND 'China'/exp, 'risk factor'/exp AND 'suicide attempt'/exp AND 'China'/exp. All results in EMBASE were limited to English, human. CNKI and VIP were used to search for articles in Chinese, and the subject words included risk factors for suicide, risk factors for suicide ideation, and risk factors for attempted suicide. We reviewed the references cited in the retrieved articles and then searched the bibliographies of these retrieved papers.

Selection of studies

Studied design included cross-sectional, case–control, and cohort studies. Study subjects were from the general population of mainland China. Suicidal behavior outcomes included suicide ideation (thoughts of engaging in behavior intended to end one's life), suicide attempt (engagement in potentially self-injurious behavior in which there is at least some intent to die), and completed suicide (the act of intentionally ending one's life). We also included the studies that were designed with the original purpose of analyzing risk behaviors other than suicide among Chinese people, but the information on the risk factors for suicide ideation, suicide attempt or completed suicide were provided. Studies that focused on subjects from Hong Kong or Taiwan, that investigated psychopathic suicide, that repeated data reported in earlier studies, or that were systematic reviews or meta-analyses were excluded from our analysis.

Validity assessment

To determine the validity of the research, the quality of each case–control study was assessed by the second author according to the primary criteria for nonrandomized studies described in the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) [14] as follows: A. selection of the study groups; B. comparability of the groups; C. ascertainment of the exposure. For cross-sectional studies, we evaluated four aspects of the quality of the studies: A. representativeness of study participants, B. proper methods to ascertain exposure, C. comparability of the analysis groups, and D. low non-response bias. Each study was scored with respect to meeting (1) or not meeting (0) each of these criteria, and a dash indicated that fulfillment of the criteria could not be determined.

Data abstraction

All of the identified articles about suicide among Chinese subjects were examined in detail. Two reviewers independently abstracted the data from potentially relevant articles. Differences were resolved by consensus. For cross-sectional studies, sampling strategy, sample size, characteristics of participants, and information used for comparative analyses were abstracted. For case–control studies, information about the size of the case and control groups; characteristics of participants; and the number of cases/controls exposed and not exposed to the study factors were abstracted from each study. When the results of a study were published more than once, only the most complete data were included in our analysis.

Assessment of heterogeneity

We evaluated heterogeneity between the studies using the Q test [15] and the I-squared statistic (I² = 100% x (Q-df)/Q) [16]. For the Q test, a P value of less than 0.10 was considered statistically significant. If P > 0.10, there was a lack of heterogeneity between the studies. If P ≤ 0.10 (i.e., heterogeneity was significant), we calculated I². If I² ≤ 50%, the heterogeneity might be acceptable; otherwise, there was significant heterogeneity between studies and we conducted a subgroup analysis. For the subgroup analyses, heterogeneity within groups was also tested.

Data synthesis

The classification of suicide risk factors is somewhat arbitrary in current reports. To better describe and sort the risk factors, we classified them in the text as follows: demographic factors, socio-family environment, lifestyle/behaviors, negative/stressful life events and psychiatric/psychological factors. To estimate the associations between these factors and suicide, we calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) for suicide ideation, suicide attempt, and completed suicide separately, using RevMan 5.0 software (RevMan software, Version 5.0, Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom). If there was no significant heterogeneity (P > 0.10 or P ≤ 0.10, but I2 < 50%), a fixed effects model was used to pool the data. If significant heterogeneity (P ≤ 0.10, I2 >50%) was found between studies, the meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore possible reasons for the heterogeneity.

Results

Description of studies

A detailed diagram of the full review process is presented in Figure 1. We identified 1101 potentially relevant articles. After reviewing their titles, abstracts, and full text, 43 studies]. (Table 1) with 192,362 subjects had suitable data for meta-analysis and were therefore included in our study (39 cross-sectional studies and 4 case–control studies).
Figure 1

Results of the literature search for systematic review and meta-analysis. This figure displays the full search process used to identify studies for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Table 1

Descriptive information for each study included in meta-analysis※

Studies

Study type

Sampling size

Study population

Gender

Residence

Years of data collection

Outcome

Zhang 1999[6]

CS

84767

16-78 years old

Female/male

Rural/urban

1989-1994

Complete suicide

Kong 2010[7]

CC

370/370

The suicides(45.30 ± 12.88)/living controls (35.03 ± 12.6)

Female/male

Rural

2005-2008

Complete suicide

Phillips 2002[8]

CC

519/536

The suicides/other injuries (>10 years)

Female/male

Rural/urban

1998-2000

Complete suicide

Li 2005[9]

CS

1653

Adolescents

Female/male

Rural/urban

1995-1999

Complete suicide

Zhang 2003[10]

CS

1421

Adolescents

Male/female

Suicide ideation

Liu 2007[12]

CS

1933

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Ou 2008[13]

CS

698

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

2005

Suicide ideation

Ma 2003[17]

CS

853

Adolescents

Male/female

Urban

Suicide ideation

Fan 2008[18]

CS

2160

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Zhang 2007[11]

CS

1294

Adolescents

Male/female

Urban

Suicide ideation

Zeng 2005[19]

CS

427

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

2003

Suicide ideation

Li 2009[20]

CY

2,012

Community members (>18 years)

Male/female

Rural/urban

2004

Suicide ideation

Yang 2008[21]

CS

8315

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural

2006

Suicide ideation,

suicide attempt

Pan 2006[22]

CS

5169

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural/urban

2004

Suicide ideation

Chen 2006[23]

CS

7422

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Yang 2007[24]

CS

3568

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

2006

Suicide ideation

Duan 2008[25]

CS

5,640

Community members (32–64 years)

Male/female

Suicide ideation, Suicide attempt

Hou 2010[26]

CS

239

Suicide-attempt cases(>15 years)

Male/female

2007-2008

Suicide ideation

Sun 2010[27]

CS

20716

Community members, >18 years

Male/female

Rural/urban

2004-2005

Suicide attempt

Bao 2009[28]

CS

1529

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Juan 2010[29]

CS

4644

Adolescents

Male/female

Urban

2004

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Niu 2006[30]

CS

2,914

Patients without psychopathic problem in hospital (>15 years)

Male/female

Rural/urban

2003-2004

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Tian 2010[31]

CS

974

Researcher(34 ± 8)

Male/female

Suicide ideation

Sun 2008[32]

CS

943

Migrants

Male/female

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Li 2004[33]

CS

2032

Students in technical school

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide attempt

Yu 2004[34]

CS

1952

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Xing 2005[35]

CS

4622

Adolescents

Male/female

2002

Suicide ideation

Gao 2001[36]

CS

2044

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural/urban

1998

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Zhuang 2007[37]

CS

3798

Adolescents

Male/female

urban

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Huang 2000[38]

CS

2467

Adolescents

Male/female

Suicide ideation

Zeng 2009[39]

CS

490

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Yan 2009[40]

CS

772

College Students

Male/female

After 2007

Suicide ideation

Shang 2008[41]

CS

2678

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

2006

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Lin 2005[42]

CS

1100

College Students

Male/female

Suicide ideation

Zhu 2006[43]

CS

1765

College Students

Male/female

2004

Suicide ideation

Xu 2004[44]

CS

610

College Students

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Zhou 2005[45]

CS

337

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural

2004

Suicide ideation

Jiang 2006[46]

CS

1514

Adolescents

Male/female

Rural/urban

Suicide ideation

Zhang 2009[47]

CS

15, 000

residents,

Male/female

Rural

2001

Suicide ideation

Feng 2006[48]

CS

2584

Adolescents

Male/female

urban

2004

Suicide ideation, suicide attempt

Sun 2007[49]

CS

1,021

Rural female(15–39 years)

female

Rural

Suicide ideation

Huan 2004[50]

CC

100/100

Suicide-attempt cases/injured by accidents

Male/female

Rural/urban

2002

Suicide attempt

Yang 2008[51]

CC

22/23

The suicide(43.1 years)/other injuries(48.2 years)

Female/male

Rural

1998-1999

Complete suicide

※: CC refers to case–control study; CS refers to cross-sectional study.

The methodological characteristics of the included studies were then evaluated. In most of the cross-sectional studies, the participants had good representativeness. However, 7 cross-sectional studies [13, 19, 23, 26, 34, 38, 42] had no description of sampling methods or a small sample size. The exposure and control groups in the majority of studies were comparable, except for three studies [21, 34, 35] that did not compare them and seven studies [11, 17, 22, 3639] that did not report the non-response rate. Overall, only 3 studies [34, 38, 39] scored below 3 (Additional file 1: Table S1). All case–control studies scored six or above and were judged as being of high methodological quality (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Meta-analysis

There were 42, 17, and 5 studies with dichotomous data available for a meta-analysis of the factors associated with suicide ideation, suicide attempt and completed suicide, respectively. Heterogeneity tests were carried out on all of these studies and the results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2

Results of meta-analysis of the studies on association between factors and suicide in Chinese population

Factors

No. of studies

No. of participants

Variance between studies

Pooled OR

95% CI

Test for overall effect (p)

Q(p)

I2(%)

Suicide ideation

Demographic characteristics

Gender (female)

27

71546

<0.00001

88

1.43

1.25, 1.64

<0.00001

Rural residence

15

51850

<0.00001

78

0.99

0.87, 1.12

0.85

Lower education

9

33749

<0.00001

95

1.39

0.91,2.13

0. 13

Poor economy

8

13260

0.004

66

1.16

0.91,1.49

0.24

Psychiatric or psychological factors

Mood disorder

6

15842

<0.00001

86

5.12

3.78, 6.94

<0.00001

Socio-family environment

*Special family

8

11490

0.07

46

1.55

1.23, 1.96

<0.00001

One child in family

11

23486

0.04

47

1.04

0.96, 1.13

0.33

Poor relationship with families

2

2345

0.25

26

2.31

1.53, 3.54

0.0001

Poor academic achievement

6

9354

0.44

0

1.25

1.08, 1.44

0.003

Study pressure

3

12590

0.16

46

1.27

1.17,1.38

<0.00001

Lifestyle/Behaviors

Smoking

4

9197

0.21

34

1.67

1.45, 1.92

<0.00001

Alcohol

4

10437

0.17

41

1.96

1.69, 2.27

<0.00001

Drug use

3

5280

0.37

0

1.97

1.39, 2.80

0.0001

Stressful life events

Physical illness

9

22639

<0.00001

98

4.82

1.24, 18.68

0.01

Suicide of relatives

4

14163

0.002

80

3.02

1.81,5.04

<0. 0001

Suicide attempt

Demographic characteristics

Gender (female)

13

3462

<0.00001

79

1.09

0.80, 1.50

0.59

rural residence

7

12006

0.004

69

0.78

0.53, 1.15

0.21

Currently unmarried

5

24938

0.06

60

1.19

0.88, 1.60

0.27

Lower education

2

2954

0.05

75

1.24

0.80, 1.90

0.34

Psychiatric or psychological factors

Mood disorder

4

19277

<0.00001

88

2.74

1.31, 5.74

0.007

Socio-family environment

Poor relationship with families

4

15371

0.15

43

3.64

2.97, 4.47

<0.00001

One child in family

2

3100

0.69

0

1.77

1.26, 2.49

0.001

Lifestyle/Behaviors

Smoking

4

7995

0.18

39

1.79

1.36, 2.35

<0.0001

Alcohol use

3

7798

0.37

0

2.50

1.86, 3.36

<0.00001

Drug use

2

5889

0.23

30

7.33

4.60, 11.67

<0.00001

Stressful life events

Poor physical health

4

8685

0.04

65

2.44

0.93, 6.41

0.07

Suicide of relatives

3

13016

0.97

0

4.80

3.12, 7.39

<0.00001

Completed suicide

Demographic characteristics

Gender (female)

4

397382

<0.01

73

2.35

1. 15, 4.78

0.02

Lower education

4

398072

0.003

79

2.33

1.48, 3.66

0.0003

Residence(rural)

3

397337

0. 04

69

2.86

1.20, 6.84

0.02

Currently married

6

398710

<0.00001

96

1.14

0.50, 2.60

0.76

Psychiatric or psychological factors

Mood disorder

4

1757

0.9

0

30.54

20.46, 45.58

<0.00001

Stressful life events

Negative life event

3

1264

0.63

0

10.03

6.63, 15.19

<0.00001

Seeking help for mood disorder

2

1215

1.00

0

5.41

3.36, 8.71

<0.00001

Previous suicide attempt

2

1306

0.68

0

31.77

13.48, 74.91

<0.00001

Suicide of relatives

2

1218

0.79

0

4.55

3.03, 6.85

<0.00001

Pesticides stored at home

2

1543

0.60

0

1.92

1.55, 2.37

<0.00001

Change of life

3

1231

0.86

0

3.79

2.56, 5.61

<0.00001

*Special family included reconstituted family, single-parent family, or non-parent family.

Pooled data by a fixed effect model.

Pooled data by a random effect model.

In terms of suicide ideation, significant heterogeneity was found for studies of the association of suicide ideation with gender, education, residence, mood disorders, physical health, suicide of relatives, and the economy. The pooled ORs and 95% CIs indicated that demographic factors (female gender), psychiatric/psychological factors (mood disorders) and negative/stressful life events (poor physical health, suicide of relative) were risk factors for suicide ideation among the Chinese population [pooled OR (95% CI): 1.43 (1.25, 1.64), 5.12 (3.78, 6.94), 4.88 (1.24, 18.68) and 3.02 (1.81, 5.04), respectively]. Lifestyle/behaviors (smoking, alcohol drinking, and substance use), family environment (single or remarried parent), poor academic achievement and study pressure were significant risk factors for suicide ideation among youth (adolescents and college students) [pooled OR (95% CI): 1.67 (1.45, 1.92), 1.96 (1.69, 2.27), 1.55 (1.23, 1.96), 1.97 (1.39, 2.80), 1.25 (1.08, 1.44) and 1.27 (1.17, 1.38), respectively] (Table 2 and Figure 2).
Figure 2

Forest plots of factors associated with suicide ideation. This figure shows forest plots of the meta-analysis of the association between each factor and suicide ideation. ORs and 99% CIs for each factor are given.

The factors associated with suicide attempt are shown in Table 2 and Figure 3. Heterogeneity tests identified significant heterogeneity among studies of the association of suicide attempt with gender, education, residence and mood disorders. Results of the meta-analysis showed that psychiatric/psychological factors (mood disorders), socio-family environment (poor relationship with family), lifestyle/behaviors (smoking, alcohol use) and negative life events (suicide of relatives) were significantly associated with attempted suicide [pooled OR (95% CI): 3.44 (1.93, 6.14), 3.64 (2.97, 4.47), 1.79 (1.36, 2.35), 2.50 (1.86, 3.36), 4.80 (3.12, 7.39), respectively].
Figure 3

Forest plots of factors associated with attempted suicide. This figure shows forest plots of the meta-analysis of the association between each factor and attempted suicide. ORs and 99% CIs for each factor are given.

Heterogeneity tests showed that studies of the association between mood disorders, seeking help for mood disorders, previous suicide attempt, suicide of relatives, negative life events, pesticides stored at home and completed suicide lacked significant heterogeneity. According to the pooled ORs and 95% CIs, demographic factors (female gender, residence in rural area, lower education), psychiatric/psychological factors (mood disorder), negative life events and recent change in life predicted completed suicide [pooled OR (95% CI): 2.35 (1.15, 4.78), 2.86 (1.20, 6.84), 2.33 (1.48, 3.66), 30.54 (20.46, 45.58), 10.03 (6.63, 15.19), and 3.79 (2.56, 5.61), respectively](Table 2 and Figure 4).
Figure 4

Forest plots of factors associated with completed suicide. This figure shows forest plots of the meta-analysis of the association between each factor and completed suicide. ORs and 99% CIs for each factor are given.

Subgroup analysis

Given the available collected data, we conducted subgroup analyses of both suicide ideation and completed suicide. Many studies have investigated the factors associated with suicide ideation among youth (adolescents and college students). We carried out subgroup analyses of the association of suicide ideation with gender, mood disorders, physical health, and suicide of relatives by population, namely, youth vs. the rest of the population. The heterogeneity test showed that studies of the effects of physical illness [13, 28, 39] and suicide of relatives [9, 11] on youth suicide ideation lacked heterogeneity, but studies on the effect of gender and mood disorder had significant heterogeneity (P < 0.00001). For factors associated with suicide ideation in the rest of the population, studies lacked heterogeneity, except for those of physical illness (P < 0.00001) [2832]. The pooled ORs (and 95% CIs) showed that female gender, mood disorders, physical illness, and suicide of relatives were still risk factors for youth suicide ideation [pooled OR (95% CI): 1.36 (1.18, 1.56), 4.97 (3.37, 7.34), 2.92 (1.39, 6.12) and 1.97 (1.44, 2.68), respectively] (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Forest plots of subgroup analysis of factors associated with suicide ideation. This figure shows forest plots of the subgroup analysis of the association between gender, suicide of relatives, mood disorder, and physical illness with suicide ideation by population (youth vs. the rest). ORs and 99% CIs for each factor are given.

For the factors associated with completed suicide, the subgroup analyses were performed by year of data collection. Regarding gender and completed suicide, when we excluded study data collected after 2000 [6], the studies using data collected before 2000 still had significant heterogeneity. The pooled results indicated that females had an even higher risk of completed suicide than males [pooled OR (95% CI): 3.03 (1.75, 5.23)]. As for education and completed suicide, when we excluded study data collected after 2000 [7], the studies [7, 8] using data collected before 2000 lacked heterogeneity. The pooled OR still indicated that lower education was a risk factor for completed suicide in China [pooled OR (95% CI): 1.95 (1.57, 2.44)] (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Forest plots of subgroup analysis of factors associated with completed suicide. This figure shows forest plots of the subgroup analysis of the association between gender and education with completed suicide by the period of data collection (before 2000 vs. 2000 and after). ORs and 99% CIs for each factor are given.

Discussion

In recent years, much attention has been given to suicide prevention in China. Since 1999, suicide prevention has been listed as a mental health priority of the Ministry of Health in China [33]. We systematically reviewed a range of risk factors of suicidal behaviors in China. Given that there is a large body of literature on the associations between numerous factors and suicidal behaviors, our meta-analysis only provides a review of the strongest and most consistently reported factors.

In Western countries, males have a higher risk of completed suicide than females [52]. In China, based on the studies included in our meta-analysis, the opposite pattern was identified; females had a 2.35-fold higher risk of completed suicide than males. In the subgroup analysis, when we excluded the study [7] with data covering 2005–2008, the pooled results of studies with pre-2000 data indicated that women had an even higher risk (3.03-fold) of suicide, which hinted that the impact of gender on suicide in China is gradually decreasing. This result is consistent with that of [Zhang et al. 5], who found that the female suicide rate decreased more than the male suicide rate during the period between 1987 and −2008 (20.4 to 6.2/100,000 vs. 14.9 to 7.0/100,000, respectively) [5],which is due to the economic development over the past decades resulting in increase of female social status in China, particularly in rural areas [5]. Our meta-analysis indicated that people living in rural areas and those with less education have a higher risk of completed suicide (pooled OR = 2.86 and 2.33, respectively). These results may explain the high suicide rates in rural areas of China [5].

Socio-family environmental factors, such as personal relationships, family violence, social and family conflicts and a sense of isolation, were significantly associated with a higher risk of completed suicide [5256]. Previous reviews also report that multiple social and interpersonal factors, such as parent/family and peer relationships, are important for our understanding of adolescent suicidality [57]. The present meta-analysis also indicated that being in a special family (single or remarried parent), poor academic achievement and study pressure increase the risk of developing suicide ideation among adolescents and college students (pooled OR = 1.50, 1.25 and 1.27, respectively). These factors may influence the development of personality or psychological disorders among youth and adolescents [58]. Our results highlight the importance of establishing harmonious family and social environments for suicide prevention. School factors should also be considered for student suicide prevention.

As for the psychiatric/psychological factors, it has been reported that mental disorders, mood disorders (severe depression, anxiety, sadness, and so on), and personality disorders are major risk factors for suicidality worldwide, particularly in Western countries [52, 55, 57, 5961]. However, Zhang et al. pointed out that in China, although still important, psychiatric factors are not the main factors associated with suicide [5]. Our meta-analysis similarly found that people with a mood disorder had 2.48-, 3.44- and 20.31-fold higher risk of suicide ideation, suicide attempt and completed suicide in China, respectively. However, the included studies qualitatively described psychiatric/psychological factors using with/without sadness, depression, and despair, rather than quantitatively measured it with a standard instruments, which may result in different criteria implemented in different studies to decide with or without these mood disorders. Therefore, a standard scale in the future studies is needed for measuring mood disorders in order to compare between studies.

Negative/stressful life events influence health in many respects. Previous studies have reported that stressful life events are associated with suicide. For example, poor physical health, disabilities, history of suicide attempts, life events, and suicide of others are significant suicide risk factors [54, 57, 6163]. An earlier study also reported that the presence of legal/disciplinary problems, potentially fatal illnesses, persistent stress, previous self-harm, and family history of suicide are risk factors for suicidal behaviors [52, 55, 64, 65]. Our meta-analysis indicated that people who had experienced a negative/stressful life event or a recent change in life, and those who had previously attempted suicide or had relatives/friends who had committed suicide had a higher risk of completed suicide. We also found that poor physical health and exposure to the suicide of a family member were risk factors for suicide ideation and suicide attempt. Indeed, a negative life event can trigger suicide or suicidal behavior because negative life events are associated with psychological disorders [66, 67].

Earlier studies have identified alcohol, smoking and drug disorders as being suicide risk factors [37, 6870]. Misuse of alcohol or drugs was also a risk factor for suicide ideation and suicide attempt [55]. Our meta-analysis similarly found that among youth, smoking, alcohol use, and drug use were risk factors for suicide ideation (pooled OR = 1.67, 1.96 and 1.97, respectively), and smoking and alcohol use were risk factors for suicide attempt (pooled OR = 2.03 and 2.50, respectively). It has long been recognized that substance abuse (alcohol and drug use) is frequently correlated with psychiatric disorders [71, 72], and that smoking in youth is associated with psychiatric disorders (depression and anxiety) [73, 74], which may explain how these unhealthy lifestyle behaviors increased the risk of suicidal behaviors.

Our meta-analysis also indicated that being an only child, pesticides being stored at home, a poor economy, lower social support, and seeking psychological help in hospitals were risk factors for suicide in China. However, further study is needed to confirm these risk factors because there were only a few studies of these factors included in our meta-analysis, all with small sample sizes.

This review provides a relatively comprehensive picture of risk factors for suicidality in China. However, our meta-analysis has some limitations. First, biases have been introduced because non-published data, papers without full text and papers published in languages other than English or Chinese were not included. Second, there was a lack of uniform measurement of complex socio-psycho-behavioral factors among the included studies, and they covered widely different population groups, producing heterogeneity between the studies even with a subgroup analysis. Third, it is possible that the studies included in this review underestimated the association between the risk factors and suicide behaviors. Participants of studies on sensitive topics such as suicide often underreport behavior to avoid embarrassment or possible stigma [75]. Fourth, the vast majority of the included studies were cross-sectional and did not allow for inferences on cause-effect mechanisms.

Our study identified four implications for the future. First, to draw comparisons between studies of different populations and regions, it is important to emphasize the use of standardized measures of socio-psychological factors and to place adequate focus on very specific population groups in any future studies. Second, risk assessment is more necessary to identify modifiable or treatable high-risk factors and available protective factors in order to take effective countermeasures Third, most of the present studies were cross-sectional studies, therefore the future researches designed with case–control or cohort studies are needed in order to make reliable inferences on cause-effect mechanisms. Fourth, there is an urgent need to emphasize further study of interventions to prevent suicide. Intervention programs in China that simultaneously address multiple factors associated with suicide would be most appropriate since suicide is multi-factorial health problem [76].

Conclusions

In conclusion, suicide risk factors in China are very complex. People in rural areas have a higher risk of developing suicide ideation and committing suicide. Socio-family environment, psychiatric/psychological factors, lifestyle, and stressful life events are the main risk factors for suicidal behavior in China. Notably, the impact of gender on suicide is gradually decreasing. For youth, interventions should focus on changing family environments, school factors and unhealthy lifestyles.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the library of the Third Military Medical University for conducting the literature searches.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Social Medicine and Health Service Management, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University
(3)
College of Preventive Medicine, Key Lab of Medical Protection for Electromagnetic Radiation, Ministry of Education of China, Third Military Medical University

References

  1. World Health Organization: Suicide rates per 100,000 by country, year and sex (Table). 2010, Geneva 27 Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organization: Figures and facts about suicide. 1999, Geneva, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1999/WHO_MNH_MBD_99.1.pdf. [Accessed 28 January 2011].Google Scholar
  3. Ji J, Kleinman A, Becker AE: Suicide in contemporary China: a review of China's distinctive suicide demographics in their sociocultural context. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2001, 1: 1-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Phillips MR, Li X, Zhang Y: Suicide rates in China, 1995–99. Lancet. 2002, 9309: 835-840.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang J, Jing J, Wu XY, Sun WW, Wang CT: A Sociological Analysis of the Decline in the Suicide Rate in China. Social Sci China. 2011, 5: 97-113.Google Scholar
  6. Zhang JX, Tang JS, Weng Z, Chai XS: Epidemiological Investigation of Suicide in Shandong Province. Chin Ment Heal J. 1999, 4: 248-249.Google Scholar
  7. Kong Y, Zhang J: Access to farming pesticides and risk for suicide in Chinese rural young people. Psychiatry Res. 2010, 2: 217-221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M: Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case–control psychological autopsy study. Lancet. 2002, 9347: 1728-1736.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Li XY, Fei LP, Zhang YP, Ji HY, Xu D, Yang GH: The characteristics and risk factors for suicides with 15–24 years of age: a case–control study. Chinese J Psychiatry. 2005, 4: 231-235.Google Scholar
  10. Zhang ZQ, Guo LT: Suicide Ideas of Middle School Students. Chin Ment Heal J. 2003, 12: 852-855.Google Scholar
  11. Liu RK, Wang WQ, Jia YH, Chen J, Wu TY: Risk Factors for Suicide Idea among Middle School Students in TianJin. Chinese J Pest Control. 2007, 11: 808-810.Google Scholar
  12. Ou GZ, Wu ZD, Xu Y: Analysis on suicide ideation and related factors among medical junior class students in Fujian Province. Chinese J Health Ed. 2008, 3: 167-169.Google Scholar
  13. Ma L, Zhang JX, Wei SQ: Suicidal Ideation and Experiences of Being Bullied and Their Relationship among High School Students. Chinese J School Health. 2003, 5: 446-Google Scholar
  14. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al: The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. 2011, http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinicalepidemiology/oxford.htm. [Accessed 28 January 2011].Google Scholar
  15. Cochran BG: The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954, 10: 101-129. 10.2307/3001666.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Higgins JP, Thompson SG: Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002, 21: 1539-1558. 10.1002/sim.1186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fan YG, Xiao Q, Li WX, Song YM, Ye QL, Ye DQ: Correlated Study between Soci-Psychological Factors and Suicide Ideation Among Medicos. Chinese J School Health. 2008, 4: 328-330.Google Scholar
  18. Zhang M, Wang LG, Xing YF: Influencing Factors to Suicidal Ideation among Middle School Students. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2007, 5: 429-Google Scholar
  19. Zeng LN, Chen ZY: Suicide Ideation of College Students in Guangzhou. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2006, 10: 863-864.Google Scholar
  20. Li XY, Fei LP, Yang SJ, Wang ZQ, Zhang YP, Li C: Relationship of Suicide Acceptability to Self-reports of Suicidal Ideation and Behavior. Chin Ment Heal J. 2009, 10: 734-738.Google Scholar
  21. Yang BS, He J, Zhong Y, Peng SP, Niang ZS: Analysis on Suicide Behaviors among the Rural Middle School Students in Henan Province. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2008, 10: 912-913.Google Scholar
  22. Pan XQ, Shi ZM, Yuan BJ, Dai Y: Relationship between depressive mood and related risk behaviors among middle school students in Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of School Doctor. 2006, 4: 343-345.Google Scholar
  23. Chen ZX, Yang J: Questionnaire investigation and case study on psychological crisis. China Youth Study. 2006, 2: 57-60.Google Scholar
  24. Yang XH, Zhou H, Wang SM: Epidemiological Investigation of Suicidal Ideation in College Students. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2007, 6: 527-528.Google Scholar
  25. Duan WD, Hu CY, Liu F, Hu JZ, Gao H, Wang J, et al: A survey on suicide idea and attempt in the parents of middle school students in Shenzhen. Medical Journal of Chinese People's Health. 2008, 192: 194-199.Google Scholar
  26. Hou JL, Qin XX, Li HX, Chen W, Tang SY, Jia XJ, et al: Survey on Suicidal Ideation among Suicide Attempters of Four General Hospitals. China Modern Doctor. 2010, 18: 38-40.Google Scholar
  27. Sun XL, Li KQ, Cun LJ, Jiang QP, Gao LH, Liu YQ, et al: The prevalence of suicide attempters in people aged 18 and older in Hebei Province. Chin Ment Heal J. 2010, 5: 362-365.Google Scholar
  28. Bao DX, Fan YG, Ye DQ: Association between suicide ideation and life event and social support in College students. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2009, 10: 939-941.Google Scholar
  29. Juan W, Xiao-Juan D, Jia-Ji W, Xin-Wang W, Liang X: The associations between health risk behaviors and suicidal ideation and attempts in an urban Chinese sample of adolescents. J Affect Disord. 2010, 126: 180-7. 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Niu YJ, Wang ZQ, Yang SJ, Fei LP, Wang XQ: Survey of Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in Inpatients at 40 General Hospitals in Beijing. Chin Ment Heal J. 2006, 7: 457-461.Google Scholar
  31. Tian F, Gao J, Li YM, Cui XH, Han XL: Suicide ideation in the scientific workers in Shanxi province. Chinese Remedies & Clinics. 2010, 6: 662-663.Google Scholar
  32. Sun YH, Zhou JB, Wang B, Yu C, Yang LS: Survey of Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts in the Migrant Workers in Railway Construction Sites. China Preventive Medicine. 2008, 9: 334-338.Google Scholar
  33. Li GY, Tao FB, Xu L: Prevalence and Its Demographic Characteristics of Suicide Behaviors among Technical Secondary School Students. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2004, 3: 316-318.Google Scholar
  34. Yu XM, Lin L, Wang J, Zhang JC, Zhao GZ: Study on self-directed violence and determinants among 1916 middle school students of the outskirts in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Reproductive Health. 2004, 1: 37-40.Google Scholar
  35. Xing Y, Ji CY, Bai Y, Ji H, Wang Y: The prevalence of injuries related behaviors among middle school students in Beijing. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2005, 2: 114-115.Google Scholar
  36. Gao M, Xu F, Shen QF, Zhang JX, Shao FQ, Wang BG, et al: Epidemiology of injury and mood disorder in Middle school in Hefei. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2001, 3: 243-244.Google Scholar
  37. Zhuang X, Zhu XZ, Zhou YP, Lian SY, Xun PC, Jiang SY: An Epidemiological Study on Suicidal Behavior of High School Students. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2007, 5: 412-414.Google Scholar
  38. Huang FY, Tao FB: Interaction Study on Drinking Alcohol and Harmful Behaviors to Health of Secondary School Students. Anhui journal of preventive medicine. 2000, 1: 11-13.Google Scholar
  39. Zeng ZP, Yang Y: Risk Factors for Suicide Attempt among Medical College Students. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine. 2009, 3: 158-160.Google Scholar
  40. Yan HH, Liu ZM, Wang SY, Yang G, Chen LF, Pen H, et al: Study on the relationship between life event and suicide ideation among undergraduates in Guangzhou. Modern Preventive Medicine. 2009, 3: 476-479.Google Scholar
  41. Shang YX, Dong GQ, Liu T: Analysis on prevalence of suicidal ideation and depression and its influence factors among undergraduate students in Yinchuan. Chinese Journal of Public Health. 2008, 8: 934-936.Google Scholar
  42. Lin Q, Xu Y: An Epidemiological Characteristic of Health Risk Behaviors Survey of Undergraduates. Acta Academiae Medicinae Suzhou. 2005, 3: 432-435.Google Scholar
  43. Zhu JP, Peng NN, Zhou YF, Gao GD, Zhu W, Luo CX: Prevalence of behaviors that contribute to unintentional and intentional injuries among college students in Shanghai. Chinese Journal of School Doctor. 2006, 3: 228-231.Google Scholar
  44. Xu HL, Xiao SY, Feng SS, Chen XX: Risk factors for suicide attempt among college students at Central South University. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2004, 4: 288-291.Google Scholar
  45. Zhou L, Xiao SY, Tang Y, Nie XQ: Suicidal ideation and its psychosocial risk factors in junior high school students in rural areas of Liuyang city. Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science. 2005, 12: 1108-1109.Google Scholar
  46. Jiang TT, Lu R, Zhang JX: Risk health related behavior and influencing factors in adolescents. Chinese Community Doctors. 2006, 14: 164-165.Google Scholar
  47. Zhang J, Stewart R, Phillips M, Shi Q, Prince M: Pesticide exposure and suicidal ideation in rural communities in Zhejiang province, China. Bull World Health Organ. 2009, 10: 745-53.Google Scholar
  48. Feng XY, Huang HF, Fu YM, Li Y: Investigation on risk health related behaviors among adolescent in QingPu district of Shanghai. Chinese Journal of School Health. 2006, 3: 240-241.Google Scholar
  49. Sun ML, Ye DQ, Fan YG, Pan FM: A correlation study on quality of life and suicidal ideation among rural females. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention. 2007, 2: 186-Google Scholar
  50. Huan M, Hamazaki K, Sun Y: Miho Itomura, Hongyan Liu, Wei Kang, et al: Suicide attempt and n-3 fatty acid levels in red blood cells: a case control study in China. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 7: 490-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Yang CL, Liu CX, Wang RL, Yang FF, Du SQ, Zhang FG, et al: Case–control study on suicide. Practical Preventive Medicine. 2008, 2: 401-402.Google Scholar
  52. Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Cha CB, Kessler RC, Lee S, et al: Suicide and Suicidal Behavior. Epidemiol Rev. 2008, 1: 133-154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Vijayakumar L, Pirkis J, Huong TT, Yip P, De AR: Socio-economic, Cultural and Religious Factors Affecting Suicide Prevention in Asia. 2011, http://www.who.int/mental_health/resources/suicide_prevention_asia_chapter2.pdf. [Accessed 15 February 2011].Google Scholar
  54. Lakshmi V, Na K, Sujit J: Suicide and Suicide Prevention in Developing Countries. 2011, Working Paper No. 27, http://www.dcp2.org/file/41/wp27.pdf [Accessed 15 February 2011].Google Scholar
  55. Hawton K, van Heeringen K: Suicide Lancet. 2009, 373: 1372-81. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60372-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller M, Azrael D, Hepburn L, Hemenway D, Lippmann SJ: The association between changes in household firearm ownership and rates of suicide in the United States, 1981–2002. Injury Prevention. 2006, 12: 178-182. 10.1136/ip.2005.010850.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. King CA, Merchant CR: Social and interpersonal factors relating to adolescent suicidality: a review of the literature. Arch Suicide Res. 2008, 3: 181-96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Hudson JL, Dodd HF, Lyneham HJ, Bovopoulous N: Temperament and family environment in the development of anxiety disorder: two-year follow-up. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011, 12: 1255-64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Shiang J: Does culture make a difference? Racial/ethnic patterns of completed suicide in San Francisco, CA 1987–1996 and clinical applications. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 1998, 28: 338-354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Bagge CL, Sher KJ: Adolescent alcohol involvement and suicide attempts: toward the development of a conceptual framework. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008, 8: 1283-96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Wetzler S, Asnis GM, Hyman RB, Zimmerman J, Rathus JH: Characteristics of suicidality among adolescents. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 1996, 26: 37-45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Latha KS, Bhat SM, D'Souza P: Suicide attempters in a general hospital unit in India: their socio-demographic and clinical profile–emphasis on cross-cultural aspects. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996, 1: 26-30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Mann JJ: A current perspective of suicide and attempted suicide. Ann Intern Med. 2002, 136: 302-311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Eddleston M, Sheriff MHR, Hawton K: Deliberate self-harm in Sri Lanka: an overlooked tragedy in the developing world. British Medical Journal. 1998, 11 (317): 133-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Cheng AT, Chen TH, Chen CC, Jenkins R: Psychosocial and psychiatric risk factors for suicide. Case–control psychological autopsy study. Br J Psychiatry. 2000, 177: 360-365. 10.1192/bjp.177.4.360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Hammen C: Stress and depression. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005, 1: 293-319. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143938.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Paykel ES: Life events and affective disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003, 108: 61-66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Phillips DP, Carstensen LL: Clustering of teenage suicides after television news stories about suicide. N Engl J Med. 1986, 11: 685-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Gould MS: Teenage suicide clusters. JAMA. 1990, 263: 2051-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Rutz W, Wålinder J, Von Knorring L, Rihmer Z, Pihlgren H: Prevention of depression and suicide by education and medication: impact on male suicidality. An update from the Gotland Study International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. 1997, 1: 39-46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Kessler RC, Crum RM, Warner LA, Nelson CB, Schulenberg J, et al: Lifetime co-occurrence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997, 4: 313-21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Wolitzky-Taylor K, Bobova L, Zinbarg RE, Mineka S, Craske MG: Longitudinal investigation of the impact of anxiety and mood disorders in adolescence on subsequent substance use disorder onset and vice versa. Addict Behav. 2012, 37: 982-5. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.03.026.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Duncan B, Rees DI: Effect of smoking on depressive symptomatology:a reexamination of data fromthe National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 162: 461-70. 10.1093/aje/kwi219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Costello DM, Swendsen J, Rose JS, Dierker LC: Risk and protective factors associated with trajectories of depressedmood fromadolescence to early adulthood. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008, 76: 173-83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Johnson JG, Cohen P, Pine DS, Klein DF, Kasen S: Association between cigarette smoking and anxiety disorders during adolescence and early adulthood. JAMA. 2000, 284: 2348-51. 10.1001/jama.284.18.2348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Phillips M: Suicide prevention in developing countries: where should we start?. World Psychiatry. 2004, 3: 156-7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  77. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/524/prepub

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement