Skip to main content

Prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among clients of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: a cross-sectional study



Studies have demonstrated the significance of commercial sex work in the ongoing transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in India. Clients of female sex workers (FSWs) are thought to be an important bridging population for HIV/STIs. However, there is a lack of information on basic characteristics of sex work clients. This study sought to describe the prevalence of HIV and other STIs, as well as examine the determinants of these pathogens among a sample of clients in south India.


Data were from a cross-sectional biological and behavioural survey of FSW clients from six districts in Karnataka State, India. The prevalence of HIV, syphilis, herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhoea (NG) among clients was examined. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyse the socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics related to the prevalence of each pathogen. Sampling weights and appropriate survey methods were utilized in regression models to account for complex sampling design.


The total sample size was 2,745. The average age of clients was 30.4 (SE:0.3). Across the total sample, the prevalence of HIV, HSV-2, syphilis and CT/NG was 5.6%, 28.4%, 3.6% and 2.2%, respectively. The prevalence of HIV/STIs varied substantially across districts, reaching statistical significance for HIV (p<.0001) and CT/NG (p=.005). In multivariable models, duration of paying for commercial sex was associated with increased risk for HIV and HSV-2 (AOR: 1.1; 95%CI: 1.0-1.1, p<.0001). Clients with brothels as a main FSW solicitation site were associated with increased risk of HIV (AOR: 2.4; 95%CI: 1.2-4.7, p=.001), while those frequenting lodges were at increased risk for CT/NG (AOR: 6.3; 95%CI: 1.9-20.6, p=.03). Examining co-infections, clients with HSV-2 infections were at substantially higher risk of being HIV-positive (AOR: 10.4; 95%CI: 6.1-17.7, p<.0001).


This study fills in important gaps in knowledge regarding clients in southern India. The strong association between HIV and HSV-2 infections highlights the complications in designing effective prevention, intervention and management programs of this well-hidden population.


Reducing the transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) remains a public health priority in India [1]. As in other parts of Asia, although HIV epidemiology is thought to be fundamentally complex [2], with elevated risk among several ‘high-risk’ sub-populations, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) [38], the predominant driver of HIV transmission in India remains sex work [811].

Within the context of sex work, it has been recognized that considerable variation exists in the relationships between female sex workers (FSWs) and their clients, and the behaviours and interactions between the two groups, resulting in substantial heterogeneity in the nature of risk for HIV transmission [1216]. Ultimately, the differences in the social and structural organisation of sex work are manifested by variations in HIV and STI prevalence among different FSW populations [15, 16].

Although high prevalence of HIV/STIs and risk behaviours associated with ongoing transmission has been observed in clients globally [1720], with a handful of exceptions [21, 22], very little is known about the prevalence and correlates of HIV/STIs among clients in India. One previous study of clients from 12 districts in India found that HIV prevalence ranged from 2% to 10%, depending on district. Although no statistically significant associations were found between HIV and factors included in their analysis, the authors found that two measures of high risk behaviour, volume of sex acts and inconsistent condom use, were positively associated with older age and having a mix of both commercial and non-commercial partners [21]. These findings align with the notion of clients as an important bridging population, with the potential to further the transmission of HIV and other STIs to both commercial and non-commercial partners, described in other localities [2, 11, 23, 24].

Given the high rates, by Indian men, of both commercial sex partnerships and inconsistent condom use [25], and the lack of access to basic HIV prevention services [26], there is a need to describe the epidemiology of HIV and other STIs in clients from India. This study therefore sought to characterise the prevalence, and factors related to HIV and other STIs among a sample of clients. As developing interventions that are tailored for FSWs and their clients is thought to be pivotal in reducing HIV incidence further [27], the results of this study can be used to inform client-focussed prevention programmes.


Study design and sampling

Data were obtained from a cross-sectional behavioural and biological survey of clients in six districts (i.e. sub-state administrative areas, including Bagalkot, Bangalore, Belgaum, Bellary, Mysore and Shimoga) in Karnataka State, southern India. Districts were chosen purposively, based on size of high risk populations (in this case FSWs, with the rationale being large FSW populations and client populations are correlated) and the socio-cultural regions of Karnataka [16]. Clients were recruited in 2008 through a multistage cluster sampling technique, similar to that described in Subramanian et al. [21]. Briefly, selection of solicitation sites occurred in the first stage of sampling, and selection of clients in the second. Depending on place of solicitation, all clients were identified by FSWs, madams, brothel owners or through visible clues suggestive of seeking sex workers. Field supervisors would then approach and recruit clients until a target number of clients was reached. For the purposes of this study, men were included in the study if they were between 18 and 60 years of age, and reported exchanging money for sex with FSWs in the past month. Clients were truncated at age 60 to focus on those that were thought to be more sexually active. Overall response rate was 82%, with lowest response rates observed in Bangalore (70%), and highest in Bagalkot (90%).

Survey organization and methods

Men were assigned study numbers for de-identification, and interviewed individually through a structured questionnaire administered face-to-face by trained workers in the local language. As in previous studies, biological data for HIV, herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), syphilis, and chlamydial (CT) and gonorrhoeal (NG) infections were gathered using blood and urine samples [21]. Blood was tested for HIV, syphilis and HSV-2 using standard serological tests, and urine was tested with a nucleic acid amplification assay (Gen-Probe Aptima) for the detection of CT and NG. Although surveys and the results of specimens were made anonymous at collection, a mechanism was in place to notify, by study number, those who were positive for syphilis. These clients would be asked to attend a clinic for treatment. Other STIs were treated syndromically. HIV results were not notified individually, but all individuals were given vouchers for free HIV testing and counseling at government testing centres. Written, informed consent was obtained for participation in the study and the institutional review boards at the University of Manitoba in Winnipeg, Canada and St. John’s University in Bangalore, India approved the study.


Respondents were compared on socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics. Age, literacy levels, district of residence, and occupation were included as socio-demographic variables. Age at first vaginal intercourse, condom use patterns with intimate partners (i.e. regular, non-commercial partnerships) and reported anal sex with MSM or hijras (i.e., transgendered MSM) were used as sexual behaviour variables. Age at first paid sex, duration of paid sex, usual place of solicitation of FSWs, number of different FSWs in the last 6 months (total, and the proportion of regular and occasional FSWs), and condom use patterns with regular (i.e. FSWs whom clients seen more than once) and occasional (i.e., non-regular or casual) FSWs were used as sex work-related variables. For condom use, the following questions were asked, depending on type of partner (“Partner Type X”). First, condom use at last sex was assessed by the question: “Was a condom used the last time you had sexual intercourse with Partner Type X?” Second, clients were asked “In general, how often do you use condoms with Partner Type X?” Clients were allowed to choose from the following: Everytime; Most of the time; Sometimes; and Never. This variable was then made dichotomous, with those answering “Never” categorized into one group, and all other remaining answers into the other group.

Statistical analysis

In bivariate analyses, chi-square tests were used to assess associations between socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex work-related characteristics and each pathogen under investigation. Because of the use of multiple comparisons, and as each variable was essentially tested four separate times in bivariate analyses, an association was only considered significant at the p<.0125 level (.05/4). Two sets of multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. First, in order to assess factors independently related to the prevalence of each specific pathogen, separate multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with each pathogen used as the outcome variable. Second, the presence of HIV was used as the outcome variable only, with all other pathogens used as predictor variables while simultaneously adjusting for the same factors in the first set of models. Because of the potential of the large sample size to detect not necessarily meaningful statistical associations, and as the main purpose of the analyses was to make comparisons between pathogens, the same independent variables were used for each pathogen, and for the coinfection comparisons. Thus, a priori, and based on a conceptual understanding of sex work in India, duration of paid sex, ability to read or write, marital status, number of FSW contacts in the last 6 months, district of residence, place of solicitation and occupation were adjusted for in multivariable models. Age and duration of paid sex were highly correlated (r2=0.88). Given the impact of collinear variables on the precision of estimation [28], only duration of paid sex was included in multivariable analyses. As a sensitivity analysis, all multivariable models were repeated with age in place of duration. Sampling weights were utilized in multiple regression models to account for the complex sampling design, using survey methods in Stata 11 [29]. Multicollinearity in multivariable models was assessed using the variance inflation factor (VIF) and tolerance statistics, corrected for the survey methods employed [30].


A total of 2757 clients were included in the study. Additional file 1 includes the socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics of the study sample. The average age of clients was 30 years, with 46% over the age of 30 at the time of the interview. The majority of respondents were married (62%), with just under half belonging in the “Other (including Labourer)” category for occupation. Respondents from Bangalore comprised approximately 31% of the sample. The majority (66%) of respondents reported having a regular non-commercial intimate partner (including spouse), with condom usage being low among intimate partners. Approximately the same proportion of respondents reported ever having anal sex with their intimate partners (5%) as having anal sex with another man or hijra in the last 6 months (6%).

Mean age of first paid sex was 22 years, with the average duration of visiting FSWs being 9 years. Respondents were most likely to report the FSWs’ home (48%) and public places (36%) as the places most frequently used to solicit FSWs. Respondents reported visiting an average of 4.3 different FSWs in the 6 months prior to their interview, with approximately 85% having had at least one contact with an occasional FSW and 42% reporting at least one contact with a regular FSW. Although practically speaking, the difference is minimal, condom use was slightly higher with occasional FSWs, with 67% of respondents reporting condom use at last sex with occasional FSWs, compared to 60% with regular FSWs.

Of the 2757 clients included in the study, 2745, 2610, 2613 and 2736 were tested for HIV, HSV-2, syphilis and CT/NG, respectively. HSV-2 was the most prevalent infection, at 28%, followed by HIV at 6%. Active syphilis was detected in 4% of the study sample who were tested for syphilis. The prevalence of CT and NG were 2% and 1%, respectively, with a prevalence of either infection being 2%.

Bivariate analyses

Additional file 2 shows the prevalence of HIV and other pathogens by socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics; results from chi-square tests of association from bivariate analyses investigating the association between each pathogen and characteristics of interest are displayed. Age was significantly associated with HIV (p=.002) and HSV-2 (p<.0001). Similarly, marital status was significantly associated with HIV (p<.0001) and HSV-2 (p<.0001). Occupation was associated with HIV only (p<.0001), with clients employed in the service industry having the highest prevalence (9%). Literacy level was significantly associated with all four pathogens, with HIV (p<.0001), HSV-2 (p<.0001) and syphilis (p=.0006) less prevalent in those that could read or write. Bagalkot district had the highest HIV and HSV-2 prevalence, at 14% and 36%, respectively, while syphilis prevalence was highest in Bellary (6%) and CT/NG highest in Mysore (5%). Only HIV (p<.0001) and CT/NG (p=.005) differed significantly across districts. Having an intimate partner was associated with higher levels of HSV-2 (p<.0001); HSV-2 prevalence among clients with intimate partners was 34%, while it was 18% among those without intimate partners. Condom use at last sex with an intimate partner was associated with CT/NG prevalence (p=.008).

Duration of visiting FSWs was positively associated with the prevalence of both HIV (p=.001) and HSV-2 (p<.0001). For example, HIV prevalence was 2% among respondents who had been visiting FSWs for a year or less and 8% among those with 10 or more years visiting FSWs. Place of solicitation was associated with HIV (p=.003). Clients who visited brothels had the highest HIV prevalence (9%), while those visiting lodges had the highest CT/NG prevalence (7%). Condom use was associated with the prevalence of HSV-2. Prevalence was higher among clients reporting never using condoms with their occasional (33% vs. 26%, p=.003) FSW partners.


Additional file 2 also shows the degree to which pathogens were related. HIV prevalence was positively and significantly related to syphilis and HSV-2 prevalence. For example, 21% of clients with syphilis were also HIV-positive, compared to 5% of clients that were not infected with syphilis (p<.0001). Similarly, elevated prevalence of HIV was seen amongst respondents who were HSV-2-positive; 16% of HSV-2-positive respondents were HIV-positive, compared to 2% of those that were not HSV-2-positive (p<.0001). Correspondingly, the prevalence of HSV-2 in those respondents who were HIV-positive was 79%, compared to 25% in HIV-negative respondents.

Multivariable models

Table 1 shows the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) from multivariable logistic regression models examining factors associated with each individual pathogen. For HIV, respondents with a longer duration of visiting FSWs were at higher odds of being HIV-positive (AOR: 1.1; 95%CI: 1.0-1.1, p<.0001), adjusted for all other factors in the model. Respondents from Bagalkot (AOR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.7-5.1, p<.0001), those reporting “service industry” as their primary occupation (AOR: 2.8; 95%CI: 1.5-5.2, p<.01), and those soliciting FSWs in brothels (AOR: 2.4; 95%CI: 1.2, 4.7, p<.01) were all at increased risk of being HIV-positive. Respondents from Bangalore (AOR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2-0.7, p<.01), relative to other districts were at decreased risk of HIV. For HSV-2 a longer duration of visiting FSWs (AOR: 1.1; 95%CI: 1.1-1.1, p<.001), and being from Bagalkot, relative to other districts (AOR: 1.6; 95%CI: 1.2-2.3, p<.01) were all associated with increased HIV risk. Respondents from Bagalkot were least likely to be positive for syphilis (AOR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.2-1.0, p<.05).

Table 1 Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) from multivariable logistic regression models, socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics associated with pathogen prevalence, Karnataka, South Indiaa

Table 2 shows the results from the multivariable models examining the association between co-infection with another STI and being HIV-positive. In the adjusted analysis, being positive for HSV-2 (AOR: 10.4; 95%CI: 6.1-17.7, p<.0001) and syphilis (AOR: 2.5; 95%CI: 1.0-6.0, p<.05) were both independently associated with HIV infection. It is important to note that the direction of causality of HIV, HSV-2 and syphilis cannot be determined through the cross-sectional nature of the data.

Table 2 Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) from logistic regression, pathogen co-infection, socio-demographic, sexual behaviour and sex-work related characteristics associated with HIV prevalence, clients of female sex workers, Karnataka, South Indiaa


This cross-sectional study characterised the prevalence of HIV and STIs among a sample of clients from six districts in Karnataka state, southern India. The results demonstrated substantial heterogeneity in the prevalence of HIV and other STIs, both by district and by type of pathogen. A strong and positive relationship between HIV infection and co-infection with other pathogens was detected. These results illustrate the complexity, not only in understanding the epidemiology of HIV and its interaction with other STIs [31, 32], but also in the management of HIV-infected persons [31, 33].

Concurrent epidemics

The prevalence of HIV, syphilis and HSV-2 in the current study was slightly lower than that observed in a previous study of clients across three states in southern India (Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu), where prevalence was 6%, 5% and 31%, respectively [21]. Although rates are highly variable, research from southern India has estimated much lower prevalence of HIV and HSV-2 among the general male population at under 1% [1, 34] and 9% [35], respectively, underscoring the importance of characterising the epidemiology of HIV and STIs among clients of FSWs. Studies of client populations conducted in countries other than India have noted similarly high rates of HIV [18, 36], as well as substantially higher rates of HSV-2 [21, 3739].

Alongside strong evidence demonstrating the link between HIV and HSV-2 [40, 41], the association between HIV and HSV-2 has been observed in client populations from other settings [36]. For example, our results are consistent with a recent study of clients conducted in Haiti, where the authors found that HSV-2-positive clients were also at nine-fold the odds for HIV infection [36]. Ultimately, the co-mingling of HIV and HSV-2 has far-reaching implications for prevention and management of HIV [42], as well as understanding the trajectories of both epidemics.

Duration of sex work involvement and other heterogeneous characteristics

Although a study by Subramanian et al. provided important information regarding patterns of risk behaviour which may potentially place certain subgroups of clients at higher risk of acquiring HIV and other infections [21], the plausibility of biological risk does not always necessarily translate into actual, or operationalised risk. That positivity for both HIV and HSV-2 in the present study was strongly associated with duration of paying for sex, and importantly, not associated with frequency of FSW contact, highlights the limitations inherent in cross-sectional data, as current behaviours do not necessarily correlate with behavioural patterns at the time of pathogen acquisition [43]. Without broader information on sexual structure, and the organization of sex work, a more complete understanding of current risk will remain elusive. Such information could include details on the distribution of FSWs relative to clients, the overlap of clients amongst FSWs, regular commercial and non-commercial partnerships, as well as social and sexual networks [44]. Longitudinal studies focussing on sexual structure dynamics examining issues such as partnership patterns, and the distribution and movement of both FSWs and clients into and out of localities over time may also be a potentially useful avenue for research [45], and may be especially salient with infections that cause ulcerative diseases as the presence (and recognition) of ulcers may cause shifts in behavioural patterns.

Although somewhat lower than what was reported by Subramanian et al. (8%), the fact that almost 6% of clients reported having anal sex with another man or hijra in the 6 months prior to their interview is of some interest. In sub-analyses by district (not shown), there was a degree of heterogeneity in reporting this sexual behaviour; prevalence was under 3% in Bagalkot (1%), Shimoga (1%), Belgaum (2%) and Bellary (3%), while highest in Mysore (6%) and Bangalore Urban (12%). Results were inconsistent when this behaviour was compared against pathogen prevalence (Table 2), with those reporting anal sex with a man/hijra having higher prevalences of HSV-2, syphilis and CT/NG, and lower HIV prevalence. However, given previously published reports of high risk behaviours amongst bisexual men [46, 6], and as clients who report concurrent sex with both FSWs and other males/hijras have the potential to act as a bridging population to two disconnected networks, further research into this sub-population is warranted [6].

Finally, in multivariable models, clients who reported mostly soliciting FSWs in brothels were at over two-fold the odds of being HIV-positive, compared to clients who mostly solicited in public places. This finding is consistent with a study on FSWs from Karnataka, which found that brothel-based FSWs had the highest HIV prevalence, despite having high rates of condom use [15]. The authors concluded that higher client volume, decreased likelihood of attending sexual health clinics, and increased likelihood of travel to Mumbai (where HIV prevalence has been reported to be near 50% among FSWs) may have contributed to brothel-based FSWs being at higher risk of HIV. As demonstrated in this study, the prevalence of HIV among brothel-based clients may also be an important factor in understanding the risks posed to FSWs.

Strengths and limitations

Our study possessed a number of strengths, including the integration of biological and behavioural components. We had a large sample size from several districts in southern India, which is notable, considering the hidden nature of client populations. There were a number of limitations to the study; first and foremost, although a complex and rigorous sampling technique was used to define the sampling frame, all possible clients were not included in the sampling universe, limiting the ability to generalize our results to the total client population in each district. Notably, clients who only exchanged gifts or services (instead of money) for sex were not included in the study. Therefore, not all types of clients were included. Future studies may want to explore the possibility of using alternative sampling strategies, such as respondent-driven sampling, or snowball sampling. However, since clients represent a loosely-defined, highly heterogeneous and disconnected group, the application of these alternative strategies may prove challenging. Expanding the definition of clients to include those that exchange sex for non-monetary transactions should be explored in future studies. Second, all responses were self-reported, and the possibility of social desirability bias cannot be discounted. Third, data were cross-sectional, and thus causality could not be inferred from our study.


In conclusion, this study presented a comprehensive description of HIV and other STIs among clients from six districts in southern India. Our results demonstrate a remarkable degree of heterogeneity, with respect to pathogen prevalence within this hidden and important bridging population. Importantly, HIV and HSV-2 were highly associated with a longer duration of involvement with sex workers, and this finding, along with the association found between infection with HIV, HSV-2 and syphilis highlights the complexity in understanding the exact determinants of pathogen prevalence. As noted by Lowndes et al. [19, 20], targeting of clients by intervention programs is a necessary component of a comprehensive response to HIV. Thus, this study can serve as a useful platform to inform present initiatives, as well as future research into client-FSW partnerships and interactions, and how they evolve over time. Given the higher rates of HIV in clients that solicit sex work in brothels, aligning with previously published work on the higher risk of HIV amongst brothel-based FSWs, improved strategies to engage with both clients and FSWs in brothels may be essential. At the same time, because present behaviours do not necessarily correlate with behaviours at the time of pathogen acquisition, more research is needed in understanding the trajectory of clients in seeking sex workers. A more nuanced understanding of when risk shifts from acquisition of HIV and other pathogens, to transmission to sex partners would likely inform the design, timing, and placement of effective and broad-based intervention programming.



human immunodeficiency virus


sexually transmitted infections


female sex workers


herpes simplex virus type 2






standard error


adjusted odds ratios

95% CI:

95% confidence intervals


men who have sex with men


variance inflation factor.


  1. 1.

    National AIDS Control Organization: HIV sentinal surveillance and HIV estimation in India, 2007. A technical brief. Edited by: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. 2007

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Steinbrook R: HIV in India - a complex epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356: 1089-1093. 10.1056/NEJMp078009.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C: Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000-2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (12): e339-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040339.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dandona L, Dandona R, Gutierrez JP, Kumar GA, McPherson S, Bertozzi SM: Sex behaviour of men who have sex with men and risk of HIV in Andhra Pradesh, India. AIDS. 2005, 19 (6): 611-619. 10.1097/01.aids.0000163938.01188.e4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Phillips AE, Boily MC, Lowndes CM, Garnett GP, Gurav K, Ramesh BM, Anthony J, Watts R, Moses S, Alary M: Sexual identity and its contribution to MSM risk behavior in Bangaluru (Bangalore), India: the results of a two-stage cluster sampling survey. J LGBT Health Res. 2008, 4 (2-3): 111-126.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Phillips AE, Lowndes CM, Boily MC, Garnett GP, Gurav K, Ramesh BM, Anthony J, Moses S, Alary M: Men who have sex with men and women in Bangalore, South India, and potential impact on the HIV epidemic. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (3): 187-192. 10.1136/sti.2009.038216.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Solomon SS, Srikrishnan AK, Sifakis F, Mehta SH, Vasudevan CK, Balakrishnan P, Mayer KH, Solomon S, Celentano DD: The emerging HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men in Tamil Nadu, India: geographic diffusion and bisexual concurrency. AIDS Behav. 2010, 14: 1001-1010. 10.1007/s10461-010-9711-2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dandona L, Dandona R, Kumar GA, Reddy GB, Ameer MA, Ahmed GM, Ramgopal SP, Akbar M, Sudha T, Lakshmi V: Risk factors associated with HIV in a population-based study in Andhra Pradesh state of India. Int J Epidemiol. 2008, 37 (6): 1274-1286. 10.1093/ije/dyn161.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vickerman P, Foss AM, Pickles M, Deering K, Verma S, Eric D, Lowndes CM, Moses S, Alary M, Boily MC: To what extent is the HIV epidemic in southern India driven by commercial sex? A modelling analysis. AIDS. 2010, 24 (16): 2563-2572. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32833e8663.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Blanchard JF, Bhattacharjee P, Kumaran S, Ramesh BM, Kumar NS, Washington RG, Moses S: Concepts and strategies for scaling up focused prevention for sex workers in India. Sex Transm Infect. 2008, 84 (Suppl 2): 19-23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schneider JA, Saluja GS, Oruganti G, Dass S, Tolentino J, Laumann EO, Yeldandi V, Pitrak D: HIV infection dynamics in rural Andhra Pradesh south India: a sexual-network analysis exploratory study. AIDS Care. 2007, 19: 1171-1176. 10.1080/09540120701336392.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    O'Neil J, Orchard T, Swarankar RC, Blanchard JF, Gurav K, Moses S: Dhandha, dharma and disease: traditional sex work and HIV/AIDS in rural India. Social Science & Medicine. 2004, 59: 851-860. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Blanchard JF, O'Neil J, Ramesh BM, Bhattacharjee P, Orchard T, Moses S: Understanding the social and cultural contexts of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: implications for prevention of HIV infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005, 191 (Suppl 1): S139-S146.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Blanchard JF, Halli S, Ramesh BM, Bhattacharjee P, Washington RG, O'Neil J, Moses S: Variability in the sexual structure in a rural Indian setting: implications for HIV prevention strategies. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83 (Suppl 1): i30-i36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ramesh BM, Beattie TS, Shajy I, Washington R, Jagannathan L, Reza-Paul S, Blanchard JF, Moses S: Changes in risk behaviours and prevalence of sexually transmitted infections following HIV preventive interventions among female sex workers in five districts in Karnataka state, south India. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (Suppl 1): i17-24. 10.1136/sti.2009.038513.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ramesh BM, Moses S, Washington R, Isac S, Mohapatra B, Mahagaonkar SB, Adhikary R, Brahmam GN, Paranjape RS, Subramanian T, et al: Determinants of HIV prevalence among female sex workers in four south Indian states: analysis of cross-sectional surveys in twenty-three districts. AIDS. 2008, 22 (Suppl 5): S35-44. 10.1097/01.aids.0000343762.54831.5c.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gomes do Espirito Santo ME, Etheredge GD: Male clients of brothel prostitutes as a bridge for HIV infection between high risk and low risk groups of women in Senegal. Sex Transm Infect. 2005, 81: 342-344. 10.1136/sti.2004.011940.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jin X, Smith K, Chen RY, Ding G, Yao Y, Wang H, Qian HZ, Chang D, Wang G, Wang N: HIV prevalence and risk behaviors among male clients of female sex workers in Yunnan, China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 53 (1): 131-135. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181b3552a.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lowndes CM, Alary M, Gnintoungbe CAB, Bedard E, Mukenge L, Geraldo N, Jossou P, Lafia E, Bernier F, Baganizi E, et al: Management of sexually transmitted diseases and HIV prevention in men at high risk: targeting clients and non-paying sexual partners of female sex workers in Benin. AIDS. 2000, 14: 2523-2534. 10.1097/00002030-200011100-00015.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lowndes CM, Alary M, Labbe AC, Gnintoungbe C, Belleau M, Mukenge L, Meda H, Ndour M, Anagonou S, Gbaguidi A: Interventions among male clients of female sex workers in Benin, West Africa: an essential component of targeted HIV preventive interventions. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83: 577-581. 10.1136/sti.2007.027441.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Subramanian T, Gupte MD, Paranjape RS, Brahmam GN, Ramakrishnan L, Adhikary R, Kangusamy B, Thomas BE, Kallam S, Girish CP: HIV, sexually transmitted infections and sexual behaviour of male clients of female sex workers in Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra, India: results of a cross-sectional survey. AIDS. 2008, 22 (Suppl 5): S69-79. 10.1097/01.aids.0000343765.00573.ce.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rodrigues JJ, Mehendale SM, Shepherd ME, Divekar AD, Gangakhedkar RR, Quinn TC, Paranjape RS, Risbud AR, Brookmeyer RS, Gadkari DA, et al: Risk factors for HIV infection in people attending clinics for sexually transmitted diseases in India. BMJ. 1995, 311: 283-286. 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.283.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Rao S, Gayle H, Alexander A: Containing HIV/AIDS in India: the unfinished agenda. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006, 6: 508-521. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70551-5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Deering KN, Tyndall MW, Shoveller J, Moses S, Blanchard JF, Shaw S, Ramesh BM, Isac S, Boily MC: Factors associated with numbers of client partners of female sex workers across five districts in South India. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37 (11): 687-695. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181ecfeeb.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Decker MR, Miller E, Raj A, Saggurti N, Donta B, Silverman JG: Indian men's use of commercial sex workers: prevalence, condom use, and related gender attitudes. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 53 (2): 240-246. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c2fb2e.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Steen R, Mogasale V, Wi T, Singh AK, Das A, Daly C, George B, Neilson G, Loo V, Dallabetta G: Pursuing scale and quality in STI interventions with sex workers: initial results from Avahan India AIDS Initiative. Sex Transm Infect. 2006, 82: 381-385. 10.1136/sti.2006.020438.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jha P, Nagelkerke NJD, Ngugi EN, Prasada Rao JVR, Willbond B, Moses S, Plummer FA: Reducing HIV transmission in developing countries. Science. 2001, 292: 224-225. 10.1126/science.1058187.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fox J: Applied Regression Analysis, Linear Models, and Related Models. 1997, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software: Release 11. 2010, College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 11.0

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    How can I check for collinearity in survey regression?. []

  31. 31.

    Celum CL: Sexually transmitted infections and HIV: epidemiology and interventions. Top HIV Med. 2010, 18 (4): 138-142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hayes R, Watson-Jones D, Celum C, van de Wijgert J, Wasserheit J: Treatment of sexually transmitted infections for HIV prevention: end of the road or new beginning?. AIDS. 2010, 24 (Suppl 4): S15-26. 10.1097/01.aids.0000390704.35642.47.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Van de Perre P, Segondy M, Foulongne V, Ouedraogo A, Konate I, Huraux JM, Mayaud P, Nagot N: Herpes simplex virus and HIV-1: deciphering viral synergy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008, 8 (8): 490-497. 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70181-6.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Munro HL, Pradeep BS, Jayachandran AA, Lowndes CM, Mahapatra B, Ramesh BM, Washington R, Jagannathan L, Mendonca K, Moses S, et al: Prevalence and determinants of HIV and sexually transmitted infections in a general population-based sample in Mysore district, Karnataka state, southern India. AIDS. 2008, 22 (Suppl 5): S117-125. 10.1097/01.aids.0000343770.92949.0b.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sgaier SK, Mony P, Jayakumar S, McLaughlin C, Arora P, Kumar R, Bhatia P, Jha P: Prevalence and correlates of Herpes Simplex Virus-2 and syphilis infections in the general population in India. Sex Transm Infect. 2011, 87: 94-100. 10.1136/sti.2010.043687.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Couture MC, Soto JC, Akom E, Labbe AC, Joseph G, Zunzunegui MV: Clients of female sex workers in Gonaives and St-Marc, Haiti characteristics, sexually transmitted infection prevalence and risk factors. Sex Transm Dis. 2008, 35 (10): 849-855. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318177ec5c.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xu JJ, Wang N, Lu L, Pu Y, Zhang GL, Wong M, Wu ZL, Zheng XW: HIV and STIs in clients and female sex workers in mining regions of Gejiu City, China. Sex Transm Dis. 2008, 35 (6): 558-565. 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318165926b.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yang C, Latkin C, Luan R, Wang C, Nelson K: HIV, syphilis, hepatitis C and risk behaviours among commercial sex male clients in Sichuan province, China. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86 (7): 559-564. 10.1136/sti.2009.041731.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang G, Wong M, Yi P, Xu J, Li B, Ding G, Ma Y, Wang H, Zheng X, Wu Z, et al: HIV-1 and STIs prevalence and risk factors of miners in mining districts of Yunnan, China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 53 (Suppl 1): S54-60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kaul R, Nagelkerke NJ, Kimani J, Ngugi E, Bwayo JJ, Macdonald KS, Rebbaprgada A, Fonck K, Temmerman M, Ronald AR, et al: Prevalent herpes simplex virus type 2 infection is associated with altered vaginal flora and an increased susceptibility to multiple sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2007, 196 (11): 1692-1697. 10.1086/522006.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Glynn JR, Biraro S, Weiss HA: Herpes simplex virus type 2: a key role in HIV incidence. AIDS. 2009, 23 (12): 1595-1598. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32832e15e8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Corey L, Wald A, Celum CL, Quinn TC: The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004, 35 (5): 435-445. 10.1097/00126334-200404150-00001.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Marks G, Crepaz N, Senterfitt JW, Janssen RS: Meta-analysis of high-risk sexual behavior in persons aware and unaware they are infected with HIV in the United States: implications for HIV prevention programs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005, 39 (4): 446-453. 10.1097/01.qai.0000151079.33935.79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ghani AC, Aral SO: Patterns of sex worker-client contacts and their implications for the persistence of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191 (Suppl 1): S34-41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Deering KN, Vickerman P, Moses S, Ramesh BM, Blanchard JF, Boily MC: The impact of out-migrants and out-migration on the HIV/AIDS epidemic: a case study from south-west India. AIDS. 2008, 22 (Suppl 5): S165-181. 10.1097/01.aids.0000343774.59776.95.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hernandez AL, Lindan CP, Mathur M, Ekstrand M, Madhivanan P, Stein ES, Gregorich S, Kundu S, Gogate A, Jerajani HR: Sexual behavior among men who have sex with women, men and hijras in Mumbai, India - multiple sex risks. AIDS and Behavior. 2006, 10: S5-S16. 10.1007/s10461-006-9129-z.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding

This research was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Souradet Shaw is supported in part by doctoral scholarships from the Manitoba Health Research Council, the International Infectious Disease and Global Health Training Program, the David G. Fish Memorial Scholarship and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Kathleen Deering is supported by doctoral scholarships from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research. James Blanchard is supported in part by the Canada Research Chair in Epidemiology and Global Public Health.

This article has been published as part of BMC Public Health Volume 11 Supplement 6, 2011: Learning from large scale prevention efforts – findings from Avahan. The full contents of the supplement are available online at URL.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Souradet Y Shaw.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

SYS was responsible for conducting the analysis, interpretation of results and writing of the manuscript; KND made substantial contributions to data analysis and interpretation and revised the manuscript critically and made important intellectual contributions to the manuscript; SRP, SI, and BMR contributed to the project’s conception, design, implementation and progress, and provided extensive feedback and edits; SM and JFB were extensively involved in the conception, methodology, and organization of the project, and provided extensive intellectual guidance and substantial feedback for the manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shaw, S.Y., Deering, K.N., Reza-Paul, S. et al. Prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among clients of female sex workers in Karnataka, India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 11, S4 (2011).

Download citation


  • Adjusted Odds Ratio
  • Syphilis
  • Intimate Partner
  • Partner Type
  • Client Population