Skip to main content

Changes in fitness and fatness in Australian schoolchildren during the summer holidays: fitness lost, fatness regained? A cohort study



Emerging evidence suggests that children’s fatness increases and fitness declines at a greater rate during the summer holiday period, compared with the school year. The aim of this study was to compare rates of change in fitness and fatness over the in-term and summer holiday periods among Australian schoolchildren. A secondary aim was to explore whether rates of change differed according to the child’s sex, socio-economic status (SES), pubertal status and weight status.


Children (n = 381) initially in Grade 4 (age 9) were recruited for this 2-year longitudinal study. Fatness (% body fat, BMI z-score, waist-to-height ratio) and fitness (20-m shuttle run and standing broad jump) were measured at the start and end of two consecutive years. Rates of change were calculated for the two in-school periods (Grades 4 and 5) and for the summer holiday period. Rates of change in fatness and fitness between in-school and holiday periods were compared, and differences in rates of change according to sex, socio-economic status, and weight status were explored.


During the holidays, percentage body fat increased at a greater rate (annualised rate of change [RoC]: +3.9 vs. Grade 4 and + 4.7 vs. Grade 5), and aerobic fitness declined at a greater rate (RoC − 4.7 vs. Grade 4 and − 4.4 vs. Grade 5), than during the in-school periods. There were no differences in rates of change for BMI z-score, waist-to-height ratio or standing broad jump. Body fatness increased faster in the holidays (relative to the in-school period) in children who are overweight and from low-SES families. Aerobic fitness declined more rapidly in the holidays in children who are overweight.


This study highlights that during the summer holiday period, children experience greater increases in fatness and declines in fitness, with children who live with low-SES families and are overweight being more affected. The findings suggest the need for targeted interventions during this period to address these negative health trends.

Trial registration

Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ACTRN12618002008202. Retrospectively registered on 14 December 2018.

Peer Review reports


Physical fitness and body composition play a crucial role in the overall health and wellbeing of children [1, 2]. Poor physical fitness and increased fatness are associated with long-term negative health outcomes, including higher risks for cardiovascular diseases and Type 2 diabetes later in life [3, 4]. Understanding the factors that influence physical fitness and body composition, including temporal fluctuations such as the school summer holiday period, can help identify critical periods of risk and thereby inform targeted interventions to better address the growing challenge of childhood obesity.

Recent research suggests that increases in fatness and declines in aerobic fitness in children occur at a greater rate during the school summer holiday period compared to the school year [5,6,7,8]. One United States (US) study [9] also found that these negative health outcomes were more pronounced among children with overweight/obesity or from low socio-economic backgrounds. Therefore, the school summer holiday period has been identified as a high-risk period for unfavourable changes in body composition and physical fitness.

The “Structured Days Hypothesis” [10] offers an explanatory framework, suggesting that the relatively unstructured days of the summer holidays lend themselves more to obesogenic behaviours (less physical activity, more screen time, irregular sleep, excess intake of unhealthy food and drinks). This is in contrast to the structured days during the school period, which include physical education classes, activity opportunities at lunch and recess, healthy school meals/lunchboxes, limited screen time, and consistent bedtimes. Much of the current evidence on summer holiday weight gain and fitness losses originates from the US. Moreno and colleagues studied changes in children’s zBMI scores across the summer and school year over a five-year period and found an increase of 5.2 percentile points in the summer compared with a decrease by 1.5 percentile points over the school year [7]. Brusseau reported a school-based intervention which improved BMI and cardiovascular fitness during the school year; however, the children experienced significant increases in BMI and decreases in fitness over summer [11]. Interestingly, these negative changes in fitness and BMI were evident in both seven and twelve-week breaks, but intensified during longer school breaks [12]. Summer holiday durations differ significantly worldwide. For example, holidays are typically 5 weeks in Thailand [13] and Singapore [14], 9 weeks in France [15] and 11 weeks in Algeria [16]. The impact of shorter summer holidays on weight gain and fitness losses remains uncertain. In addition, the timing of major festive events may interact with summer holiday changes. As of now, no studies have examined summer holiday weight and fitness changes in southern hemisphere countries, where summer coincides with Christmas. Moreover, children’s summer activities vary significantly across different regions. In North America and Europe, children commonly attend summer camps [17] whereas these are relatively uncommon in many other world regions.

The aim of this study was to describe and compare rates of change in children’s fitness and fatness over the in-school and summer holiday periods in Australia, a southern hemisphere country with relatively short summer holidays (6 weeks) and relatively few summer camp offerings. A secondary aim was to explore whether rates of change differed according to the child’s sex, socio-economic status (SES), pubertal status and weight status.

Materials and methods


The participants in this study were drawn from the Life on Holidays study [18], a 2-year (wave 1: 2019–2020; wave 2: 2020–2021) longitudinal (cohort) study tracking changes in children’s fitness and fatness across the in-school and summer holiday periods. Children were recruited from 24 primary (elementary) schools in Adelaide, Australia. They were in Grade 4 (age 9 years at the time of enrolment). A stratified random sample was used to select schools. To achieve this, all primary schools in metropolitan Adelaide were divided into socio-economic tertiles (low, medium, and high) according to the Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage [19], a socio-economic status indicator based on parental education, occupation, and school location. Schools were invited at random within tertiles, with a probability proportional to the number of students enrolled in each school. Once a school accepted the invitation, all children in Grade 4 were invited to take part. Recruitment continued until at least 100 children from each SES tertile had been recruited. Recruitment occurred in two waves, starting in 2019 and 2020. A total of 381 children were enrolled, with complete data available on 127–156 participants according to the outcome, partly due to COVID-related interruptions in data collection.


The dependent variables were measures of fatness (percentage body fat, Body Mass Index (BMI) z-score and waist-to-height ratio) and fitness (maximal aerobic power, standing broad jump). Each child’s height was measured using a Seca 213 stadiometer (Seca, Hamburg, Germany), and weight and percentage body fat (%BF) using the InBody 270 Bioelectrical Impedance Analyser scales (InBody, Seoul, South Korea), without shoes and in light clothing. BMI was calculated from height and weight, with age- and sex-specific z-scores (zBMI) derived [20]. When compared to underwater weighing, the InBody provides a valid (r = 0.69–0.79 for children of this age) and reliable (CVintra = 3%) estimate of body fat [21]. Waist girth was taken using a Lufkin W606 PM steel anthropometric tape (Michigan, USA) held at the midpoint between the iliac crest and the bottom of the bottom of the rib cage in the midline of the body. Waist girth was expressed as a percentage of height to normalise for body size (Waist:Ht%). Both waist circumference and BMI show high intra- and inter-rater reliability (> 0.88 and > 0.90 respectively [22]). V̇O2max (ml/kg/min) was estimated using the 20-m shuttle run test (20mSRT), a widely used aerobic fitness assessment where individuals run back and forth between two lines 20 m apart, following audio cues that gradually increase in speed, until they can no longer maintain the pace [23]. The performance scores from the 20mSRT were then converted to; V̇O2max values using the equation of Nevill et al. [24]. The 20mSRT has high to very high test-retest reliability (r = 0.78–0.93) [25] and good criterion validity (r = 0.78) compared to gas-analysed graded exercise tests [26]. Explosive strength was assessed using the standing broad jump (SBJ in cm [27]). This measure was included alongside the 20mSRT to provide a more comprehensive understanding of children’s health-related fitness levels. The SBJ is an excellent general measure of explosive strength [28] that has excellent health-related predictive validity and is recommended for school-based testing [29].The child jumped as far forward as possible from a standing position, swinging their arms and bending their knees before take-off. The best of three jumps was retained for analysis. In children of this age, the standing broad jump test has very high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.88) [30]. This test is also closely related to other lower body muscular strength tests (R2 = 0.83–86), as well as upper body muscular strength tests (R2 = 0.69–0.85) [28].

The covariates were sex, SES, pubertal status, and weight status. Sex and SES were obtained via a one-off parent questionnaire at baseline. SES was quantified based on parent reported occupation, household income and highest education level (for both parents). From these, a composite SES z-score was derived, based on the procedure outlined in Gibbings, Blakemore and Strazdins [31].

Pubertal status was measured using The Pubertal Development Scale [32]. For this, parents were asked to report on their child’s stage of pubertal development based on a number of physical indicators including the development of body hair, occurrence of growth spurt, and changes in complexion. All questions were answered on a 4-point scale (1 = has not begun, 2 = has barely started, 3 = is definitely underway, 4 = growth or development is definitely complete) [32]. Children’s weight status was obtained by categorising their BMI as either underweight, healthy weight, overweight, or obese using the International Obesity Taskforce criteria [33]. As only 5 participants (1%) were classified as underweight, these were included in the normal weight category.


Numerous efforts were made to minimise study biases. In particular, a randomised stratified sampling methodology was used. Outcomes were gathered using high-quality tools and protocols with established reliability and validity. Research personnel were thoroughly trained, and participant retention was maximised through the use of multiple reminders and follow ups and a yearly incentive for participants to remain engaged in the study.

Sample size justification

Full details of the power calculation are provided in the study protocol [18]. Briefly, a target sample size of n = 225 completers would provide 80% power to detect the hypothesised difference of change in % body fat of 0.6% per year between the in-school and holiday period. The sample size was inflated to account for study drop out.


Figure 1 shows the process of data treatment. Participants were measured at four timepoints: first term in Year 4 (T1; February to April 2019 for Wave 1/2020 for Wave 2), last term in Year 4 (T2; October to December 2019 for Wave 1/2020 for Wave 2), first term in Year 5 (T4; February to April 2021 for Wave 1/2022 for Wave 2), and last term in Year 4 (T5; October to December 2021 for Wave 1/2022 for Wave 2). There was a measurement point during the summer holidays (T3), but this was irrelevant to this study. For each of the five outcomes, the rate of change from T1 to T2 was extrapolated to the start of the summer holidays (typically within a month of the November-December measurements) to estimate what the value would have been at the start of the holidays. Similarly, the change from T4 to T5 was back-extrapolated to the end of the summer holidays (typically within a month of the February-April measurements) to estimate what the value would have been at the end of the holidays. Rates of change were then calculated for each of the outcome variables for the periods T1 to start of holidays (∆T1-start), start to end of holidays (∆start-end), and end of holidays to T5 (∆end-T5), by dividing the change by the number of days for each period. These were then expressed as rate of change per year for ease of understanding.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic of data treatment to extrapolate the rates of change in fatness and fitness across Grade 4, Grade 5 and the holiday period. Outcomes (here, estimated VO2max) were measured at the start (T1) and end (T2) of Grade 4, and at the start (T4) and end (T5) of Grade 5. Values were then forward- (Grade 4) or back-extrapolated (Grade 5) to estimate the values at the start and end of the holidays. Rates of change between timepoints, indicated by the slopes of the segments, were derived by dividing the calculated change by the number of intervening days, and then annualised. ∆T1-start = rate of change from T1 to start of holidays; ∆Start-End = rate of change from start to end of holidays; ∆End-T5 = rate of change from end of holidays to T5

Multi-level models were carried out in R [34] using the nlme package [35] to test whether the rate of change in outcomes was different during holidays compared with the in-school periods (the R script is provided in Supplementary file 1). The dependent variable was the daily rate of change in outcome (%body fat, zBMI, Waist:Ht%, V̇O2max and standing broad jump). The independent variable (fixed effect) was the timespan (Grade 4, Grade 5 or holidays), with contrasts set to compare the holiday period to each of the in-school periods (i.e., a positive beta for the holiday-Grade 4 contrast would indicate a higher rate of change in the outcome variable during the holidays than during Grade 4). Random effects (intercepts) were included to account for the repeated measures within participants, within schools, within study waves. Model diagnostic plots showed that the assumption of homogeneity of variance of residuals was violated – variance was greater during holidays than during the in-school periods. To accommodate the heteroscedasticity, we allowed for independent spread in the variance of the timespan variable using the varIdent variance structure in nlme. To test for the moderation effects of sociodemographic variable (sex, SES, pubertal status and weight status), interaction effects between these variables and the timespan variable were included in a second set of models. All betas were expressed as annualised rates of change (daily rate of change * 365), and plotted to aid interpretation. An alpha of 0.05 was used to denote statistical significance.


Participant characteristics are shown in Table 1. A total of 381 children enrolled for the study, but 23 dropped out before the study began. Complete data on outcomes at all four time-points were available for n = 133 for %BF, n = 127 for zBMI, n = 129 for Waist:Ht%, n = 132 for V̇O2max, and n = 156 for SBJ.

Table 1 Participant characteristics

Table 2; Fig. 2 show the values of the dependent variables at each timepoint, and the annualised rates of change. Children generally got fatter over the 2-year period (%BF increased by 6%, and zBMI by 8%), although Waist:Ht decreased marginally. Aerobic fitness declined by 3% while explosive strength improved by 9%.

Table 2 Observed rates of change (means, SDs) for fatness and fitness outcomes across the study timepoints.
Fig. 2
figure 2

Visualisation of the observed rates of change in fatness and fitness across Grade 4, Grade 5 and the holiday period. Filled symbols represent measured values and empty symbols extrapolated values

Percentage body fat increased at a faster rate during the holidays than during the in-school periods. The rate of increase in %BF was significantly higher in the holidays than in the Grade 5 school year (by + 4.7%BF/year; p = 0.030; Table 3), though the difference, which was of a similar magnitude, was not significant for the Grade 4 school year (+ 3.9%BF/year; p = 0.076). Figure 2 suggests that aerobic fitness improved slightly in Grade 4, decline rapidly during the holidays, and declined slowly in Grade 5. Statistical analyses (Table 3) contrasting the rate of change during the holidays versus the other timepoints showed that aerobic fitness declined more rapidly during the holidays than during the in-school periods. The annualised rate of decline in V̇O2max was significantly greater in the holidays compared to both the Grade 4 (by 4.7 ml/kg/min/year; p = 0.010) and Grade 5 school years (by 4.4 ml/kg/min/year; p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in rates of change across periods for zBMI, Waist:Ht%, or SBJ.

Table 3 Annualised rates of change in fatness and fitness metrics during the holiday periods compared to in-school periods

We next explored whether differences in rates of change (holidays vs. school years) varied according to socio-demographic characteristics (sex, SES, pubertal status, weight status; Table 4).

Table 4 Comparative annuaslised rates of change in fatness and fitness metrics by socio-demographic categories: holiday vs. in-school periods


Sex did not moderate differences in rates of change for any outcome.

Socio-economic status

SES moderated differences in the rate of change in %BF and zBMI. Overall, children from lower SES families showed greater increases in fatness over the holidays compared to children from higher SES families. Every 1 SD increase in SES was associated with a 7.5%BF/year greater difference in the rate of change during the in-school period in Grade 4 compared to the holidays (p = 0.045), and a 9.4%BF/year greater difference for Grade 5. Similarly, a 1 SD increase in SES was associated with a 0.9 SD/year greater relative difference in rates of change in zBMI in Grade 5 vs. the holidays (p = 0.040), although the relative difference of + 0.7 SD/year was not significant for Grade 4. Socio-economic status did not moderate differences in the rates of change of Waist:Ht%, SBJ, or V̇O2max.

Pubertal status

Pubertal status moderated differences in rates of change in all fatness measures. Children who were early pubertal in Grade 4 showed relatively lower increases in all fatness measures over the holidays compared to children who were mid-pubertal (p = 0.023–0.046). In Grade 5, these differences were similar but did not reach statistical significance. Children who were pre-pubertal, however, showed relatively faster declines in aerobic fitness during the holiday periods compared to children who were mid-pubertal (p = 0.027–0.029). Pubertal status did not moderate differences in rates of change in SBJ performance.

Weight status

Weight status moderated differences in rates of change in %BF. Compared to children of normal-weight, children who were overweight (but not obese) increased %BF relatively faster in the holiday periods than in both in-school periods (p = 0.020–0.027). The corresponding rate of decline in aerobic fitness for children who were overweight (but not obese) was higher in the holiday period (p = 0.010–0.013). Weight status did not moderate differences in the rates of change of zBMI, Waist:Ht% or SBJ.


Main findings

The focus of this study was to compare rates of change in children’s fitness and fatness between in-school and summer holiday periods, and to explore whether differences in rates of change in these outcomes were moderated by sex, SES, pubertal status, or weight status. During the holiday period, there was a significant increase in the rate of change of percentage body fat and a significant increase in the rate of decline of aerobic fitness, indicating differential increases in fatness and decreases in fitness in the holiday period. However, there were no differences in rates of change for BMI z-score, waist-to-height ratio, or standing broad jump. Some differences in rates of change in fitness and fatness were moderated by socio-demographic characteristics. In general, children who were overweight and from lower-SES families exhibited relatively faster increases in fatness and declines in fitness in the holidays compared to the in-school period.

The study’s finding of summer holiday weight gain is generally consistent with previous studies [7, 36, 37]. Similarly, studies from Sallis et al. [38] and Fu et al. [39] have reported summer holiday fitness losses. Interestingly, the size of the effects in this study were generally smaller than those reported in European and North American studies. Furthermore, the effects in our study were not consistent across all measures of fatness and fitness, which also contrasts with previous literature. It is possible that Australia’s relatively short summer holidays (which are only half to one-third as long as those in North America and Europe) may underpin these differences in findings.

Few previous studies have examined whether summer holiday weight gain and fitness losses differ according to sociodemographic and anthropometric characteristics [9, 40]. Consistent with Franckle et al. [9] we found that weight gain and fitness losses appeared to be greater for children from low-SES families. Other studies have identified SES gradients in other summer holiday deficits, such as academic losses, and that the differential widens over time [41]. It is possible that economic and environmental barriers faced by low-SES households (inability to purchase nutritious foods, less access to safe neighbourhoods and organised extracurricular activities to promote adequate physical activity [40]) are exacerbated during the school holidays when children spend more time at home. While our study only measured changes over one summer holiday period, it is conceivable that the SES differential identified in this study may accumulate over time, contributing to the recognised higher rates of children who were overweight or obese from low SES families [34].

Similar to Moreno et al. [7], our results suggested that summer holiday weight gain and fitness loss was worse for children who were overweight, relative to those who were normal weight. Interestingly, this pattern was not confirmed for children who were obese. The model beta values suggested that the magnitude of weight gain and fitness loss was larger for children who were obese relative to children of normal weight, however the results were not statistically significant. It is possible that the relatively small number of children with obesity (n = 18) meant that this comparison was underpowered.

Interestingly, patterns for summertime changes in fatness and fitness were not consistent for the various markers. Generally speaking, results were significant when fatness was considered based on %BF (and mostly consistent based on zBMI), but not when considered based on waist:height. It is likely that %BF measured by bioimpedance is a more sensitive measure of adiposity than zBMI and waist:height. Furthermore, it is possible that changes in body shape associated with puberty may have contributed to the lack of significant findings for the waist:height variable.

Similarly, clear fitness losses were apparent in V̇O2max estimated from the SRT, whilst there were summertime improvements in standing broad jump performance. For the standing broad jump, the rate of improvement across summer was similar to that observed during the subsequent Grade 5 school year. Previous research has reported that standing broad jump performance improves each year by 8.3–9.1 cm [42], which is very similar to the 7.2 cm p.a. increase observed in this study. The reasons underpinning the differential in patterns of change in aerobic fitness versus muscular fitness are unclear. One explanation is that muscular fitness may be relatively more stable than aerobic fitness. However, previous research has identified Australian children do less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in the holidays compared to school time [43], which may explain the loss of aerobic fitness over the summer. In contrast, it is possible that children continue to engage in sufficient muscle-strengthening activities over the summer to maintain their muscle fitness, but insufficient aerobic activities to maintain their aerobic fitness. Furthermore, age-related growth, pubertal development and motor skill development may contribute to improvements in muscular fitness despite the relatively smaller dose of MVPA during the holidays.

It is interesting to consider that the significant increases in percentage body fat and decreases in aerobic fitness may even be directly related. Given that the 20mSRT is performed under gravity where children carry their entire body mass, a holiday-related increase in BMI should reduce 20mSRT performance. Fat mass per se does not affect aerobic fitness but increased fat mass could reduce 20mSRT performance and our estimate of V̇O2max, which uses body mass as an input. Because fat mass is partly metabolically inactive and constitutes an additional load to carry, increased fat mass could reduce V̇O2max (mL/kg) by inflating the denominator [44]. Therefore, increased fatness could reduce V̇O2max when expressed as mL/kg even if true aerobic fitness (i.e., absolute V̇O2max in the numerator) increased. Any holiday-related decline in physical activity levels that increased fat mass could in turn reduce V̇O2max in mL/kg (and 20mSRT performance).

Strengths and limitations

Key strengths of the current study are its longitudinal design spanning two school years. Furthermore, it used the highest quality measures of fatness and fitness possible for collection in a school setting. Relatively few studies of children’s summer holiday fatness and fitness have been conducted outside the US, and none in the southern hemisphere or in countries with relatively short summer holidays, meaning this study makes a highly valuable contribution to the international literature.

Limitations must also be acknowledged. The COVID-19 pandemic commenced approximately halfway through data collection. This led to some data loss (because some schools wouldn’t permit data collection visits to go ahead) and also likely contributed to participant dropout, which was considerable. This is likely to have negatively affected the study’s power, and may also impact the generalisability of findings. Finally, we chose to study children across Year 4 and 5 on the basis that they were older enough to reliably complete fitness tests, and so that the likelihood of them changing schools would be minimised (children attending government schools in South Australia transition to high school at the end of Year 6, though a considerable portion choose to transition to private schools for high school, with many transitioning at the end of Year 5). However, we acknowledge that children’s bodies change rapidly at this age, which may make it harder to detect summer-holiday-related changes in fatness and fitness. Changes across the 2-year period are overlaid on expected age-related changes in growth and development. At this age, %BF increases on average by 0.3–0.8% p.a [45], somewhat less than the 0.8% p.a. increase in this study. Cross-sectional data indicate that V̇O2max decreases by 1.2–1.6 ml/kg/min/year [46], somewhat more than the 0.7 ml/kg/min/year in the current study.


If the holiday environment leads to increases in fatness and decreases in aerobic fitness, there are potential policy implications. Interventions targeted at the holiday period (such as summer camps and programs which offer a mix of physical and learning activities), at the home environment, or at effectively extending the in-school environment (such as shortening the holiday period) may provide the structured day needed to prevent weight gain and losses in aerobic fitness. Further, many sporting competitions stop during the summer holidays (e.g., netball, basketball) while others (e.g., little athletics) have a short Christmas-New Year break. Perhaps an emphasis on moderate-to-vigorous aerobic activities like swimming, bike riding, running, and dancing, as recommended in national physical activity guidelines, may help minimise holiday-related declines in aerobic fitness, particularly while competitive sports are in a hiatus.

There is accumulating evidence that interventions of this sort of structured programming have been effective in North America and Europe, where summer camps are common [47]. US studies have found summer camps to increase moderate- to vigorous- physical activity levels and steps, and reduce sedentary time [48] to reduce body fat and increase aerobic fitness [49], and to significantly reduce the risk of obesity in the subsequent year [50]. A nutrition- and fitness-focused 6-week summer day camp reduced weight and waist-to-height ratio among children who were overweight or obese [51]. Recently there has been some discussion around establishing a culture of summer camps in Australia, where they are much less common [52].

Family-based interventions are difficult during the holiday diaspora, but a recent systematic review [53] showed small-to-moderate benefits. Another systematic review found family-based interventions to be more effective than school-based interventions for reducing obesity in children who were of primary-school-age [54].


In summary, this study provides important insights into the differential rates of change in children’s fitness and fatness during in-school and summer holiday periods. Our findings suggest that during the holiday period, there is a significant increase in the rate of change of percentage body fat and a significant decline in fitness. Furthermore, we found that socio-demographic characteristics such as SES and weight status moderated the rates of change in fitness and fatness, with children who were overweight and from lower-SES families exhibiting relatively faster increases in fatness and declines in fitness during the holiday period compared to the in-school period. These findings have important implications for policymakers and public health practitioners, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address the summer holiday deficits in children’s fitness and fatness, particularly among low-SES and overweight populations. Overall, this study contributes to the international literature on children’s summer holiday fatness and fitness, and underscores the importance of longitudinal studies using high-quality measures of fitness and fatness in school settings.

Data Availability

Data analysed during this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author Carol Maher by emailing her at


  1. Ortega FB, Ruiz JR, Castillo MJ, Sjöström M. Physical fitness in childhood and adolescence: a powerful marker of health. Int J Obes. 2008;32(1):1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2010;7(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, Froberg K, Ekelund U, Brage S, et al. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (the European Youth Heart Study). The Lancet. 2006;368(9532):299–304.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh AS, Mulder C, Twisk JW, Van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008;9(5):474–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baranowski T, O’Connor T, Johnston C, Hughes S, Moreno J, Chen T-A, et al. School year versus summer differences in child weight gain: a narrative review. Child Obes. 2014;10(1):18–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carrel AL, Clark RR, Peterson S, Eickhoff J, Allen DB. School-based fitness changes are lost during the summer vacation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(6):561–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moreno JP, Johnston CA, Woehler D. Changes in weight over the school year and summer vacation: results of a 5-year longitudinal study. J Sch Health. 2013;83(7):473–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. von Hippel PT, Workman J. From kindergarten through second grade, US children’s obesity prevalence grows only during summer vacations. Obesity. 2016;24(11):2296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Franckle R, Adler R, Davison K. Accelerated weight gain among children during summer versus school year and related racial/ethnic disparities: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brazendale K, Beets MW, Weaver RG, Pate RR, Turner-McGrievy GM, Kaczynski AT, et al. Understanding differences between summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days hypothesis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity. 2017;14(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brusseau TA, Burns RD. Children’s weight gain and cardiovascular fitness loss over the summer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2770.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Brusseau TA, Burns RD, Fu Y, Weaver RG. Impact of year-round and traditional school schedules on summer weight gain and fitness loss. Child Obes. 2019;15(8):541–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bangkok Preparatory School. School calendar 2023. Accessed 15 Sept 2023.

  14. Ministry of Education. Academic calendar and key dates 2023. 15 Sept 2023.

  15. Ministere de l’Education Nationale et de la Jeunesse. Calendrier scolaire 2023. 15 Sept 2023.

  16. Ministere de l’Education Nationale. Calendrier des vacances scolaires 2023/2024 2023. 15 Sept 2023.

  17. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on School Health. Health appraisal guidelines for day camps and resident camps. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1770–3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Watson A, Maher C, Tomkinson GR, Golley R, Fraysse F, Dumuid D, et al. Life on holidays: study protocol for a 3-year longitudinal study tracking changes in children’s fitness and fatness during the in-school versus summer holiday period. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). Glossary: index of community socio-educational advantage (ICSEA) 2023. 1 Feb 2023.

  20. World Health Organization (WHO). BMI-for-age (5–19 years) 2007. 1 Feb 2023.

  21. Jensky-Squires NE, Dieli-Conwright CM, Rossuello A, Erceg DN, McCauley S, Schroeder ET. Validity and reliability of body composition analysers in children and adults. Br J Nutr. 2008;100(4):859–65.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Berkson SS, Espinola J, Corso KA, Cabral H, McGowan R, Chomitz VR. Reliability of height and weight measurements collected by physical education teachers for a school-based body mass index surveillance and screening system. J Sch Health. 2013;83(1):21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(2):93–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nevill AM, Ramsbottom R, Sandercock G, Bocachica-González CE, Ramírez-Vélez R, Tomkinson G. Developing a new curvilinear allometric model to improve the fit and validity of the 20-m shuttle run test as a predictor of cardiorespiratory fitness in adults and youth. Sports Med. 2021;51:1581–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Blanchard J, Léger LA, Tremblay MS. The 20-m shuttle run: assessment and interpretation of data in relation to youth aerobic fitness and health. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2019;31(2):152–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayorga-Vega D, Aguilar-Soto P, Viciana J. Criterion-related validity of the 20-m shuttle run test for estimating cardiorespiratory fitness: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2015;14(3):536.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Docherty D. Field tests and test batteries. In: Docherty D, editor. Measurement in Pediatric Exercise Science. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1996. pp. 285–334.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Castro-Piñero J, Ortega FB, Artero EG, Girela-Rejón MJ, Mora J, Sjöström M, et al. Assessing muscular strength in youth: usefulness of standing long jump as a general index of muscular fitness. J Strength Conditioning Res. 2010;24(7):1810–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pillsbury L, Oria M, Pate R. Fitness measures and health outcomes in youth. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fjørtoft I, Pedersen AV, Sigmundsson H, Vereijken B. Measuring physical fitness in children who are 5 to 12 years old with a test Battery that is functional and easy to administer. Phys Ther. 2011;91(7):1087–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gibbings J, Blakemore T, Strazdins L. Measuring family socioeconomic position. Australian Social Policy. 2009;8:121–68.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Petersen AC, Crockett L, Richards M, Boxer A. A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. J Youth Adolesc. 1988;17(2):117–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000;320(7244):1240.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pinheiro J, Bates D, R Core Team. _nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–157, Vienna, Austria; 2022.

  35. Pinheiro J, Bates D. Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer: New York;; 2000.

  36. Smith DT, Bartee RT, Dorozynski CM, Carr LJ. Prevalence of overweight and influence of out-of-school seasonal periods on body mass index among American. Indian Schoolchildren. 2009;6(1):A20.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Von Hippel PT, Powell B, Downey DB, Rowland NJ. The effect of school on overweight in childhood: gain in body mass index during the school year and during summer vacation. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(4):696–702.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Faucette N, Hovell MF. The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students. Sports, play and active recreation for kids. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(8):1328–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fu Y, Brusseau TA, Hannon JC, Burns RD. Effect of a 12-week summer break on school day physical activity and health-related fitness in low-income children from CSPAP schools. J Environ Public Health. 2017;2017:9760817.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sallis JF, Conway TL, Cain KL, Carlson JA, Frank LD, Kerr J, et al. Neighborhood built environment and socioeconomic status in relation to physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status of adolescents. Prev Med. 2018;110:47–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Alexander KL, Entwisle DR, Olson LS. Summer learning and its implications: insights from the beginning School Study. New Dir Youth Dev. 2007;(114):11–32.

  42. Tomkinson GR, Carver KD, Atkinson F, Daniell ND, Lewis LK, Fitzgerald JS, et al. European normative values for physical fitness in children and adolescents aged 9–17 years: results from 2 779 165 eurofit performances representing 30 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(22):1445–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Olds T, Maher C, Dumuid D. Life on holidays: differences in activity composition between school and holiday periods in Australian children. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(2):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cureton KJ, Boileau RA, Lohman TG, Misner JE. Determinants of distance running performance in children: analysis of a path model. Res Q Am Alliance Health Phys Educ Recreation. 1977;48(2):270–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. McCarthy H, Cole T, Fry T, Jebb S, Prentice A. Body fat reference curves for children. Int J Obes. 2006;30(4):598–602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Tomkinson GR, Lang JJ, Tremblay MS, Dale M, LeBlanc AG, Belanger K, et al. International normative 20 m shuttle run values from 1 142 026 children and youth representing 50 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(21):1545–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bohnert A, Zarrett N, Beets MW, Hall G, Buscemi J, Heard A, et al. Society of behavioral medicine (SBM) position statement: SBM supports curbing summertime weight gain among America’s youth. Translational Behav Med. 2017;7(4):912–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dugger R, Brazendale K, Hunt E, Moore J, Turner-McGrievy G, Vogler K, et al. The impact of summer programming on the obesogenic behaviors of children: behavioral outcomes from a quasi-experimental pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2020;6:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Park K-S, Lee M-G. Effects of summer school participation and psychosocial outcomes on changes in body composition and physical fitness during summer break. J Exerc Nutr Biochem. 2015;19(2):81.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mahoney JL. Adolescent summer care arrangements and risk for obesity the following school year. J Adolesc. 2011;34(4):737–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. George GL, Schneider C, Kaiser L. Healthy Lifestyle Fitness Camp: a summer approach to prevent obesity in low-income youth. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(3):208–12e1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. English R. Should Aussie kids go on US-style summer camps? The Conversation. 2015.

  53. Brown H, Atkin A, Panter J, Wong G, Chinapaw MJ, Van Sluijs E. Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a systematic review, meta‐analysis and realist synthesis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(4):345–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kothandan SK. School based interventions versus family based interventions in the treatment of childhood obesity-a systematic review. Archives of Public Health. 2014;72:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The life on Holidays study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council [grant number APP1143379] (2018–2022). The funding body played no role in the design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript. AW is supported by NHMRC Project Grant APP143379 (2018–2022). CM is funded by a Medical Research Future Fund Investigator Grant (GNT1193862). DD is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship APP1162166 and by the Centre of Research Excellence in Driving Global Investment in Adolescent Health funded by NHMRC APP1171981. AM is supported by the Centre of Research Excellence in Driving Global Investment in Adolescent Health funded by NHMRC APP1171981. FF is supported by an Australian Defence Science and Technology Group research grant (MyIP: 9275) and an iMOVE Australia CRC research grant (6 − 002). AM is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) grant and the Centre of Research Excellence in Driving Global Investment in Adolescent Health funded by NHMRC APP1171981. EE is supported by an RTP grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



TO and CM developed the concept for this study. TO, CM, DD, FF, GT & RG obtained funding for the original Life on Holidays study. TO, CM, EE & AM drafted the manuscript. DD performed the analysis. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree with the order of presentation of the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Maher.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of South Australia Human Research Ethics Committee, Adelaide, Australia (200980), the South Australian Department of Education and Child Development (2008-0055) and the Adelaide Catholic Education Centre (201820). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Principals and parents provided written informed consent, and children provided verbal assent on each measurement occasion.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olds, T., Dumuid, D., Eglitis, E. et al. Changes in fitness and fatness in Australian schoolchildren during the summer holidays: fitness lost, fatness regained? A cohort study. BMC Public Health 23, 2094 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: