Skip to main content
Download PDF

An open-label randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine on Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in gay and bisexual men: the MenGO study protocol

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 607 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gonorrhoea is an ongoing public health concern due to its rising incidence and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. There are an estimated 82 million new Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections each year, with several populations at higher risk for gonococcal infection, including gay and bisexual men (GBM). If left untreated, infection can lead to serious morbidity including infertility, sepsis and increased risk of HIV acquisition. Development of a gonorrhoea vaccine has been challenging, however there is observational evidence that serogroup B meningococcal vaccines, used to protect against the closely related bacteria Neisseria meningitidis, could provide cross-protection against N. gonorrhoeae.

Methods

The MenGO (Meningococcal vaccine efficacy against Gonorrhoea) study is a phase III open-label randomised control trial in GBM to evaluate the efficacy of the four-component meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, 4CMenB, against gonorrhoea. A total of 130 GBM will be recruited at the Gold Coast Sexual Health Clinic, Australia, and randomised to either receive 2 doses of 4CMenB or no intervention. Participants will be followed up for 24 months with testing for N. gonorrhoeae and other sexually transmissible infections every three months. Demographics, sexual behaviour risk, antibiotic use, and blood samples for analysis of N. gonorrhoeae-specific immune responses, will be collected during the study. The primary outcome is the number of N. gonorrhoeae infections in participants over 2 years measured by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Secondary outcomes are vaccine-induced N. gonorrhoeae-specific immune responses, and adverse events in trial participants.

Discussion

This trial will determine if the 4CMenB vaccine is able to reduce N. gonorrhoeae infection. If shown to be effective, 4CMenB could be used in gonococcal prevention. Analysis of 4CMenB-induced immune responses will increase understanding of the type of immune response needed to prevent N. gonorrhoeae, which may enable identification of a potential correlate of protection to aid future gonorrhoea vaccine development.

Trial registration

The trial has been registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619001478101) on 25 October 2019.

Peer Review reports

Background

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a significant healthcare challenge worldwide, causing an estimated 82 million cases/year of the sexually transmitted infection (STI) gonorrhoea [1]. Gonorrhoea cases have risen in many regions in recent years (e.g., 45% increase in the USA in the 5 years between 2016 and 2020 [2] and 144% increase in Australia in the 10 years between 2011 and 2020 [3]). Gonorrhoea infection is more prevalent in particular risk groups, including gay and bisexual men (GBM) [4]. GBM who are taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) have an incidence rate of 37.8 cases per 100-person years [5]. Gonorrhoea is increasingly difficult to treat due to ongoing emergence of antimicrobial resistance [6]. N. gonorrhoeae has developed resistance to all classes of antibiotics used to treat it since the 1940s, with new treatment regimens needed every 5–10 years [7]. In particular, treatment for pharyngeal gonorrhoea remains a challenge, with lower treatment efficacy for current and new antibiotic regimens [8], contributing to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and onward transmission. Since 2013, the WHO and CDC have highlighted gonorrhoea as an “urgent” public health threat [9,10,11] and in 2018, ‘super gonorrhoea’, resistant to all routine antibiotics was reported in the UK [12] and Australia [13].

N. gonorrhoeae infection can result in a range of clinical outcomes, which vary by site of infection and by sex [14]. Pharyngeal and anal infections are typically (~ 90%) asymptomatic, while genital tract infection is more frequently symptomatic. In men, genital infection is typically characterised by symptomatic urethritis, but may be asymptomatic in up to 10% of patients [15]. Complications of untreated infection in men include urogenital tract abscesses, orchitis, and prostatitis [16]. In women, 50–80% of lower genital tract gonorrhoea infections remain asymptomatic, and hence are frequently untreated. Ascending infection to the Fallopian tubes occurs in up to 45% of infected women, and can result in serious complications including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, pre-term or low weight birth, stillbirth, neonatal blindness and infertility [16]. Gonorrhoea increases the risk of HIV transmission, and is a major contributor to the ongoing HIV epidemic [14]. Hence, the development of a vaccine to prevent gonorrhoea is urgently needed [9] .

Despite more than a century of research, there is currently no gonorrhoea vaccine. This is largely due to the fact that gonococcal infection does not protect against subsequent infection, therefore there are no correlates of protection from natural immunity to guide vaccine development [14]. Moreover, humans are the only natural host for N. gonorrhoeae and there is no animal model that accurately mimics human infection and transmission. Thus, there are limited tools to enable discovery and evaluation of potentially protective vaccine candidates [14]. However, it has been reported that meningococcal serogroup B vaccines, used to protect against the closely related bacteria Neisseria meningitidis, may be associated with reduced incidence of N. gonorrhoeae infection [17,18,19,20].

The meningococcal B outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine MeNZB™ was used to vaccinate > 1 million people in New Zealand between 2004–2008 in response to a meningococcal B epidemic [21]. A retrospective case-control study of this cohort showed that MeNZB™-vaccinated individuals were significantly less likely to contract gonorrhoea compared to unvaccinated controls, with a predicted vaccine efficacy of 31% [17]. Although modest, this was the first time a vaccine has been associated with any protection against gonorrhoea [18]. A broader spectrum four-component meningococcal B vaccine, 4CMenB (marketed as Bexsero®) is now available and contains the MeNZB™ OMVs plus three recombinant protein antigens (NadA, and the fHbp-GNA2091 and NHBA-GNA1030 fusions) [22]. Recent observational cohort studies using data linkage have demonstrated 4CMenB vaccine efficacy of 32–40% in preventing gonorrhoea infection in young adults [19, 20]. Mathematical modelling of hypothetical gonococcal vaccines has indicated that even a vaccine with a modest effectiveness of ~ 30% could reduce the population prevalence of gonorrhoea by ~ 50% within 20 years in a general heterosexual population [23] and by > 40% within 2 years in a GBM population [24].

The level of antigenic identity between N. meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae has been suggested to be responsible for the possible cross protection between the meningococcal serogroup B vaccines and N. gonorrhoeae. Bioinformatic analysis has identified that a homologue of 20 of the 22 major meningococcal OMV proteins on the 4CMenB vaccine are present in N. gonorrhoeae (16 proteins have > 90% identity, 2 proteins have > 80% identity to the meningococcal vaccine antigen), and the 4CMenB NHBA antigen shares > 67% identity to NHBA from N. gonorrhoeae strains [25]. Furthermore, human anti-4CMenB antibodies are cross-reactive with N. gonorrhoeae [25]. The 4CMenB vaccine has been licensed in more than 40 countries worldwide, and the safety and side effects of the vaccine have been well documented [26]. 4CMenB is licensed in Australia for active immunisation against invasive disease caused by N. meningitidis group B strains in people > 2 years of age (two doses with an interval of ≥ 1 month between doses) [27].

Methods

Aims and hypotheses

The MenGo trial aims to determine if vaccination with the meningococcal vaccine 4CMenB can reduce the incidence of N. gonorrhoeae infection in GBM over 2 years, and to investigate vaccine induced immune responses during the study period. We hypothesise that 4CMenB could reduce the risk of acquiring gonorrhoea and that investigation of 4CMenB-induced antibodies that are cross-reactive with N. gonorrhoeae could reveal the mechanism of 4CMenB-induced protection against N. gonorrhoeae infection.

Study design and setting

MenGO is a Phase III open-label unblinded randomised control trial of 4CMenB vaccination of GBM to protect against N. gonorrhoeae infection. The study design is shown in Fig. 1. Participants will be randomly assigned by 1:1 allocation to either: (1) the ‘4CMenB vaccine arm’ who will be vaccinated at baseline and 3 months with 4CMenB; or (2) the unvaccinated ‘no treatment arm’. An STI screen as per the Australian STI guidelines [28] will occur at baseline and at 3 monthly study visits over 2 years. Blood will be collected for antibody analysis at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24-month visits, and information regarding demographics, concurrent medication, previous gonorrhoea infections, antibiotic use and sexual behaviour risks will be collected at each visit. The trial will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and will satisfy Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) reporting conventions [29].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of MenGO Trial design

Full size image

Eligibility criteria for participants

The study is limited to GBM attending a public sexual health clinic, who are at a high and ongoing risk of acquiring N. gonorrhoeae.

Inclusion criteria

GBM who are:

  1. i.

    Between 18 and 50 years of age.

  2. ii.

    Able to understand spoken and written English.

  3. iii.

    Men who have sex with other men.

  4. iv.

    Able to participate in study procedures including attending for all study visits.

  5. v.

    At risk of acquisition of gonorrhoea at the time of enrolment into the study.

  6. vi.

    Agree to be contacted via phone/ email by the study team.

AND are:

  1. a)

    Currently taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) at the time of enrolment OR

  2. b)

    Have been diagnosed with gonorrhoea in the last 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded from participation if they have:

  1. i.

    Documented allergy to latex and/ or kanamycin.

  2. ii.

    Confirmed previous history of vaccination for meningococcal B with 4CMenB.

  3. iii.

    Contraindications to receiving the meningococcal B vaccine which include:

  1. a)

    Anaphylaxis following a previous dose of any meningococcal vaccine.

  2. b)

    Anaphylaxis following any vaccine component.

  1. iv.

    Participants who are currently recommended and funded to receive 4CMenB [30] including participants who have:

  1. a)

    Sickle cell disease or other haemoglobinopathies.

  2. b)

    Congenital or acquired asplenia (e.g., plenectomy or hyposplenia).

  3. c)

    Defects in, or deficiency of, complement components including factor H, factor D or properdin deficiency.

  4. d)

    Current or planned future treatment with eculizumab (a monoclonal antibody directed against complement component C5).

Previous meningococcal disease and previous vaccination with the strain specific meningococcal B vaccine MeNZB™ is not a contraindication for receiving 4CMenB.

Intervention

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the ‘4CMenB vaccine arm’ or the ‘no treatment arm’ of the study. Participants allocated to the vaccine group will receive a 2-dose schedule of 4CMenB (first dose at baseline visit, second dose at 3-month visit). For each dose, 0.5mL of 4CMenB will be administered by deep intramuscular injection, preferably in the deltoid muscle region of the upper arm. Participants allocated to the no treatment control group will not receive any treatment.

Outcomes

Table 1 lists primary and secondary outcomes alongside key study objectives and endpoints.

Primary outcome

  1. (i)

    Number of N. gonorrhoeae infections in participants at any anatomical site over 2 years, diagnosed by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT).

Secondary outcomes

  1. (ii)

    Level and function of N. gonorrhoeae-specific antibodies.

  2. (iii)

    Number of serious adverse events (SAEs) reported where the cause has been determined to be related to the study treatment.

  3. (iv)

    Number of participants consented to the trial compared to number of participants where pre-screening was performed.

Table 1 Study objectives, outcomes and endpoints
Full size table

Sample size

A target of 130 participants will be recruited into the study. To detect a reduction in gonococcal prevalence from 30% (based on a gonococcal prevalence of 29.4% in patients taking PrEP at Gold Coast Sexual Health Service) to 10% (assuming a vaccine efficacy of 30%, based on the predictive MeNZB™ [17]) with 80% power at a significance level of 0.05 using the proportions test, 112 participants will need to be recruited into equal groups of 56 (G*Power 3.1). To account for an attrition or loss to follow up at a rate anticipated to be less than 10% the total recruiting target is 130. The Gold Coast Sexual Health Service see more than 10,000 patients per annum of which approximately 1,700 are GBM, which should enable adequate recruitment to reach the target sample size.

Recruitment and consent

Potentially eligible participants will be identified by clinicians and will be referred to a study investigator who is delegated to provide further information and check eligibility. Eligible participants will be given a Participant Information and Consent Form (PICF) and asked to provide written informed consent prior to commencement in the study. Participants will also consent for the study team to acquire results from other health services for the purpose of the research, to maximise data collection should participants attend for gonorrhoea testing elsewhere during the period of the study. Participants will be able to change or withdraw their consent to participate at any time during the course of the study.

Interventions

The MenGo trial involves nine study visits over 24 months for each participant, including a baseline visit (month 0) and 3-monthly follow up visits. Table 2 outlines the trial schema. Participants in the ‘4CMenB vaccine arm’ will receive vaccination at baseline (dose 1) and at month 3 (dose 2). Participants who receive the vaccine will have their blood pressure and temperature taken prior to administration of vaccine. All other physical examinations at all time points will be guided by patient symptoms. At baseline and at each 3-monthly follow up visit, participants in both the ‘4CMenB vaccine arm’ and the ‘no treatment arm’ groups will undergo a sexual health screen as per the Australian STI guidelines [28]. Samples taken will include first-void urine for urogenital gonorrhoea and chlamydia by NAAT, oropharyngeal and anorectal swabs for gonorrhoea and chlamydia by NAAT, and blood for HIV, hepatitis and syphilis screening. Urine and swabs for microscopy examination, Mycoplasma genitalium testing and other microbiological culture and sensitivity testing may also be collected. Participants with a positive test will be recalled to the clinic for management and treatment as per standard of care. Participants will continue to receive other standard of care testing and treatment as required. A non-standard-of-care blood sample will be collected from both groups at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months post vaccine for analysis of N. gonorrhoeae-specific antibodies.

In order to maximise retention in the study, all participants will receive an automated reminder of their next study visit via the clinic electronic reminder system. Participants will routinely be sent an SMS or email reminder of appointments. Participants who failed to attend will be sent two reminders via SMS or email and a final phone call. Unless a participant is discontinued from the study, study visits, procedures and data can continue to be collected at any time from enrolment up to 24 months (+ 14 days). Reasons for discontinuation include participant withdrawal, adverse event, investigator discretion or termination of the study by the Sponsor. Participants who are lost to follow up during the study period will not be replaced.

Table 2 Study Schema
Full size table

Randomisation and allocation

Participants will be randomized 1:1 to 2 groups of 65 – the ‘4CMenB vaccine arm’ or the ‘No vaccine arm’. A biostatistician independent of the clinical researchers will use the ralloc package of Stata 17 (College Station, Tx., USA) to perform block randomization with blocks of size 2–6. Allocations will be placed in sequentially numbered sealed envelopes and kept in a locked cupboard with restricted access to the area (security pass protected). Randomised allocation will only be performed once written informed consent has been obtained. Investigators will allocate study participants from the sequential sealed envelopes, ensuring that there is blinding of the randomisation process.

Sample processing and testing

All samples for tests which participants receive as standard of care will be transported to Pathology Queensland (Gold Coast University Hospital) for testing according to existing local procedure and policy. For N. gonorrhoeae detection by NAAT, all specimens will undergo the combined Chlamydia trachomatis/ Neisseria gonorrhoeae test on the Roche Cobas® 4800 machine which is currently used as standard of care by Pathology Queensland. Oropharyngeal and anorectal samples which test positive are confirmed by a secondary Pathology Queensland in-house PCR targeting the gonococcal opa genes and porA pseudogene [31]. Results from NAAT are reported as N. gonorrhoeae “Detected” or “Not detected”. N. gonorrhoeae infection is diagnosed only if both the Roche Cobas® 4800 and in-house confirmatory tests are reported as “Detected”. Culture will also be performed for any site which is positive by NAAT for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The non-standard of care blood sample for N. gonorrhoeae-specific antibody assays will be allowed to clot, then centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 10 min at the Gold Coast Sexual Health Clinic. Serum will be aliquoted into sterile tubes and stored at − 20˚C prior to transport to the Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University for analysis as per standard methods [25, 32,33,34,35]. Antibodies in blood-derived serum will be characterised using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to quantify the level of specific antibody isotypes that cross-react with N. gonorrhoeae whole cell bacteria, and specific target proteins) [25, 32,33,34,35]. The ELISA titre is defined as the reciprocal of highest serum dilution with a positive signal (i.e., a signal greater than the negative sample mean plus three standard deviations). The functional activity of antibodies against N. gonorrhoeae will be tested in serum bactericidal activity (SBA) and neutrophil-dependent opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) assays [32,33,34,35]. Antibody neutralisation of N. gonorrhoeae may also be tested in functional assays that measure antibody-dependent blocking of bacterial adherence to epithelial cells or of antigen binding to their ligand [33, 34]. The SBA, OPA or neutralisation titre is defined as the reciprocal of the final serum dilution giving ≥ 50% killing or neutralisation.

Data collection and management

Data collected at each visit will include patient demographics, concurrent medication, previous N. gonorrhoeae infections, antibiotic use, sexual behaviour risks and previous STI and blood borne virus (BBV) testing within the last 3 months. If the participant has had testing for N. gonorrhoeae elsewhere, all efforts will be made to obtain a copy of those results and associated clinical information either from the patient or directly from the treating physician or clinic. If the participant reports any antibiotic use, the name of the antibiotic and reason for use will also be asked.

Adverse events

Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAEs), according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), will be collected from the participant self-reported diary and adverse event enquiry by study investigators at each visit. All SAEs will be reported as per Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Gold Coast Hospital Ethics Committee guidelines.

Data management

Clinical data and all data in case report forms will be entered into the Sexual Health Information Programme (SHIP) which is the study site’s clinical electronic medical record software, RedCap® and Microsoft Excel. All databases will be stored on a Queensland Health, password protected secure network. Upon consent to participate in the study, the participant will be allocated a study number which will be used to identify the participant throughout the study and retain participant confidentiality. A Master log will be kept for re-identification in the case where participants are required to be re-called for study, safety or clinical reasons. All data will be deidentified for monitoring and audit purposes (by a Study Monitor from the Office of Research, Governance and Development at the Gold Coast University Hospital) and for presentation or publication of results. The Sponsor will also be advised by a Data and Safety Monitoring Committee made up of independent members not involved in the study.

Statistical methods

Data analysis will be performed by statisticians at the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service (GCHHS) who are not involved in other study procedures, to reduce chance of bias in the statistical analysis. The number and percentage of participants with NAAT confirmed N. gonorrhoeae from any anatomical site will be presented along with 95% confidence interval (CI) at the completion of the study by treatment group. Total observation time will also be recorded. Associations between 4CMenB vaccination status and the incidence of N. gonorrhoeae infection will be investigated using Fisher’s exact test and univariate Poisson regression. The incident rate ratio (IRR) with 95% CIs of incidence of N. gonorrhoeae infection in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group will be calculated. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the 4CMenB vaccinated group and the “no vaccine” group will be compared. If any variables are seen to be different between groups (not expected due to randomization) these will be included in a multivariable Poisson regression model along with 4CMenB vaccine predicting N. gonorrhoeae infection. The difference in incidence rates of N. gonorrhoeae infections between the study treatment and no treatment at the end of the 2-year study period will also be calculated along with 95% CI. The study treatment will be considered effective if the lower limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the difference between the incidence rates of gonorrhoea in the study treatment group is 30% lower than the no treatment group. Further analyses may be performed based on the observed differences between the treatments in some subgroups. If it is the case that individual participants record more than one incidence of N. gonorrhoeae infection in the period of the study, the same analyses will be performed but using a generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach to Poisson regression to account for within participant correlation.

Log(base2) transformed antibody, SBA, OPA and neutralisation titres for each of the 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24-month time points will be, initially, compared between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups by linear regression with log2-titre at time 0 as a covariate. Other clinical and demographic covariates will also be tested, along with vaccination status. Variables will be considered as covariates and retained in the model if P < 0.05. Finally, a mixed effects analysis of the trajectory of the log2-titres over the 24-month duration of the study will be performed with participant number as a random effect and vaccination status as the fixed effect of interest. Again, other clinical and demographic variables will be tested as covariates.

The number and percentage of treatment-emergent AEs, study treatment-related AEs, SAEs and AEs leading to study withdrawal will be provided.

Discussion

A vaccine to protect against N. gonorrhoeae infection is urgently needed due to the rising gonorrhoea case numbers and the continued emergence of antibiotic resistance. Despite more than a century of research, only four gonococcal vaccine candidates have been tested in human clinical trials and none of these elicited protection against gonorrhoea [14]. Failures of these early vaccine candidates created hesitancy in the field and delayed gonococcal vaccine development. However, the field has been reinvigorated by recent epidemiological [17, 19, 20, 36,37,38,39] and in vitro data [40] suggesting that meningococcal B vaccines may provide cross protection against gonorrhoea.

MenGO is one of the first randomised control trials worldwide that aims to determine the efficacy of the licenced meningococcal B vaccine 4CMenB against gonorrhoea. The trial includes GBM on PrEP, or GBM with a recent N. gonorrhoeae infection. This study is limited to GBM due to the high gonorrhoea incidence in this cohort. In Australia, the majority of N. gonorrhoeae infections are in GBM [3], and GBM on PrEP have a gonorrhoea incidence of 37.8 cases per 100-person years [5]. Current guidelines for participants taking PrEP recommend 3-monthly review by a health practitioner for testing for STIs [41]. Therefore, participants are unlikely to bear an excess burden to participate in this study. Recent, prior infection with N. gonorrhoeae is a risk factor associated with STI diagnosis [42] and is therefore added as an inclusion criterion.

If this study shows that the 4CMenB vaccine is effective in reducing the incidence of gonorrhoea in GBM, this will be the first direct evidence that vaccination can prevent N. gonorrhoeae. The opportunity to use the licenced 4CMenB vaccine would be a relatively rapid and cost-effective approach to reduce gonorrhoea prevalence. Given the high gonorrhoea incidence in GBM, combined increased risk of HIV acquisition associated with concurrent N. gonorrhoeae infection [43, 44] and the current threats to management of gonorrhoea due to the emergence of multi-drug resistance [45] new prevention strategies are urgently needed in high risk populations such as GBM. Use of 4CMenB in GBM would also impact the wider population due to bridging between GBM and heterosexuals [46, 47]. Furthermore, outcomes of this study would aid policy and practice change to facilitate the investigation and use 4CMenB as a general population gonorrhoea prevention strategy.

The type of the immune response needed to prevent infection with N. gonorrhoeae is unknown, and investigation of the immune response to 4CMenB in this study will enable characterisation of antibodies that are cross-reactive with N. gonorrhoeae. This may enable identification of the mechanism of vaccine-mediated protection and of a correlate of immune protection. This aspect of the study is unique and of critical importance to enable ongoing evaluation of 4CMenB cross-protection and to facilitate the development of a gonorrhoea vaccine with higher efficacy and/or a different product profile if required.

If 4CMenB is effective against N. gonorrhoeae, this could lead to a widespread change in prevention and control strategies, which may lead to a substantial decrease in gonorrhoea. This would improve sexual and reproductive health and reduce costs associated with testing, treatment and management of N. gonorrhoeae-associated antimicrobial resistance and sequelae.

Data availability

Data sharing does not apply to this article as data collection has not yet been completed or analysed.

Abbreviations

4CMenB:

four-component meningococcal B vaccine

ELISA:

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

GBM:

gay and bisexual men

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HREC:

Human Research Ethics Committee

MSM:

Men who have sex with men

NAAT:

Nucleic acid amplification test

OPA:

Opsonophagocytic activity

PrEP:

Pre-exposure prophylaxis

RCT:

Randomised controlled trials

SBA:

serum bactericidal activity

STI:

Sexually transmissible infection.

References

  1. WHO. Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. 2012 [cited 2023 March 29]; 1–36. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44863

  2. CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2020. 2019 [cited Oct 2022]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2020/default.htm

  3. Kirby Institute. HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia: annual surveillance report 2021. The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, https://kirby.unsw.edu.au/report/asr2021, Editor. 2022.

  4. Fairley CK, et al. Frequent transmission of Gonorrhea in Men who have sex with men. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(1):102–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Traeger MW, et al. Real-world trends in incidence of bacterial sexually transmissible infections among gay and bisexual men using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in Australia following nationwide PrEP implementation: an analysis of sentinel surveillance data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(8):1231–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kong FYS, et al. Treatment efficacy for pharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75(11):3109–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Unemo M, et al. Sexually transmitted infections: challenges ahead. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(8):e235–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. de Vries HJC, et al. Efficacy of ertapenem, gentamicin, fosfomycin, and ceftriaxone for the treatment of anogenital gonorrhoea (NABOGO): a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(5):706–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. WHO. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria to guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. 2017 [cited 2023 March 29]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed

  10. CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. [cited 2023 March 29]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/pdf/ar-threats-2013-508.pdf

  11. CDC, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States,. 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html.

  12. Eyre DW et al. Gonorrhoea treatment failure caused by a Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with combined ceftriaxone and high-level azithromycin resistance, England, February 2018.Euro Surveill, 2018. 23(27).

  13. Whiley DM, et al. Genetic characterisation of Neisseria gonorrhoeae resistant to both ceftriaxone and azithromycin. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(7):717–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards JL, et al. Is gonococcal disease preventable? The importance of understanding immunity and pathogenesis in vaccine development. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2016;42(6):928–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Unemo M, et al. Gonorrhoea. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5(1):79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hook EW, Handsfield HH. Gonococcal Infection in the Adult, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, K.K. Holmes, Editor. 2008,McGraw-Hill: New York.pp. 627–645.

  17. Petousis-Harris H, et al. Effectiveness of a group B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea in New Zealand: a retrospective case-control study. Lancet. 2017;390(10102):1603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seib KL. Gonorrhoea vaccines: a step in the right direction. Lancet. 2017;390(10102):1567–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abara WE, et al. Effectiveness of a serogroup B outer membrane vesicle meningococcal vaccine against gonorrhoea: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(7):1021–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang B, et al. Effectiveness and impact of the 4CMenB vaccine against invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease and gonorrhoea in an infant, child, and adolescent programme: an observational cohort and case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis; 2022.

  21. Arnold R, et al. Effectiveness of a vaccination programme for an epidemic of meningococcal B in New Zealand. Vaccine. 2011;29(40):7100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Toneatto D, et al. Emerging experience with meningococcal serogroup B protein vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(5):433–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Craig AP, et al. The potential impact of vaccination on the prevalence of gonorrhea. Vaccine. 2015;33(36):4520–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hui BB, et al. A gonococcal vaccine has the potential to rapidly reduce the incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection among urban men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2022;225:983.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Semchenko EA, et al. The serogroup B meningococcal vaccine Bexsero elicits antibodies to Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;69(7):1101–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Flacco ME, et al. Immunogenicity and safety of the multicomponent meningococcal B vaccine (4CMenB) in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(4):461–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GSK, Australian Product Informatio Bexsero (multicomponent meningococcal group b vaccine) suspension for injectionhttps://www.ebs.tga.gov.au/ebs/picmi/picmirepository.nsf/pdf?OpenAgent&id=CP-2013PI-02131-1&d=201904301016933, 2018.

  28. ASHM., The Australian STI Management Guidelineshttp://www.sti.guidelines.org.au/, 2019.

  29. Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. (ATAGI), A.T.A.G., ATAGI Clinical Advice on Changes to Vaccine Recommendations and Funding for People with Risk conditions from 1 July 2020,D.o. Health, Editor. 2020. p.4.

  31. Goire N, et al. A duplex Neisseria gonorrhoeae real-time polymerase chain reaction assay targeting the gonococcal porA pseudogene and multicopy opa genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;61(1):6–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jen FE et al. The Lst Sialyltransferase of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Can Transfer Keto-Deoxyoctanoate as the Terminal Sugar of Lipooligosaccharide: a Glyco-Achilles Heel That Provides a New Strategy for Vaccines to Prevent Gonorrhea.mBio, 2021. 12(2).

  33. Semchenko EA, Day CJ, Seib KL. MetQ of Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a surface-expressed Antigen that elicits bactericidal and functional blocking antibodies. Infect Immun. 2017;85(2):e00898–16.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jen FE, et al. The Neisseria gonorrhoeae Methionine Sulfoxide reductase (MsrA/B) is a Surface exposed, immunogenic, vaccine candidate. Front Immunol. 2019;10:137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Semchenko EA, Day CJ, Seib KL. The Neisseria gonorrhoeae Vaccine Candidate NHBA Elicits Antibodies That Are Bactericidal, Opsonophagocytic and That Reduce Gonococcal Adherence to Epithelial Cells.Vaccines (Basel), 2020. 8(2).

  36. Longtin J, et al. Possible impact of wide-scale vaccination against Serogroup B Neisseria Meningitidis on Gonorrhea Incidence Rates in one region of Quebec, Canada. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. 2017;4(1):S734–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Reyes Diaz LM, et al. VA-MENGOC-BC Vaccination induces serum and mucosal anti Neisseria gonorrhoeae Immune responses and reduces the incidence of Gonorrhea. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(4):375–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Whelan J, et al. Ecologic study of Meningococcal B Vaccine and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection, Norway. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):1137–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bruxvoort KJ, et al. Prevention of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with meningococcal B vaccine: a matched cohort study in Southern California. Clin Infect Dis; 2022.

  40. Semchenko EA, et al. The Serogroup B Meningococcal Vaccine Bexsero elicits antibodies to Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(7):1101–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wright E, et al. Australasian Society for HIV, viral Hepatitis and sexual Health Medicine HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: clinical guidelines. Update April 2018. J Virus Erad. 2018;4(3):143–59.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Traeger MW, et al. Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis with incidence of sexually transmitted infections among individuals at high risk of HIV infection. JAMA. 2019;321(14):1380–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jarvis GA, Chang TL. Modulation of HIV transmission by Neisseria gonorrhoeae: molecular and immunological aspects. Curr HIV Res. 2012;10(3):211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schust DJ, Quayle AJ, Amedee AM. Mucosal co-infections and HIV-1 transmission and pathogenesis. Curr HIV Res. 2012;10(3):195–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Department of Health, A.G., Gonorrhoea Health Alert. 2018: https://www.health.gov.au.

  46. Trembizki E, et al. The Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Australia: a Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study, 2012. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(12):1591–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewis DA. The role of core groups in the emergence and dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant N gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89(Suppl 4):iv47–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The study is funded by a grant from the Gold Coast University Hospital Foundation. KLS and EAS are supported by the Australian NHMRC (APP2002182). The funding bodies and study sponsor had no role in the design of the study. The study sponsor is Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gold Coast Sexual Health, Southport Community Health Precinct, Southport, Qld, 4215, Australia

    Caroline Thng & Maree O’Sullivan

  2. Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University, Southport, Qld, 4215, Australia

    Caroline Thng, Evgeny A. Semchenko & Kate L. Seib

  3. Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Qld, 4215, Australia

    Ian Hughes

Authors
  1. Caroline Thng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evgeny A. Semchenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ian Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maree O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kate L. Seib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CT, EAS, MS and KLS designed the study. IH provided statistical advice on the study design and statistical analysis. All authors have contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Thng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol (Version 4.0 dated 21st August 2021)s, informed consent forms, recruitment materials, and all participant materials have been reviewed and approved by the by the Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QGC/48972) and the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC2020/009). Written informed consent will be provided by participants prior to any study procedures being performed. All methods were carried out in compliance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thng, C., Semchenko, E.A., Hughes, I. et al. An open-label randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) vaccine on Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in gay and bisexual men: the MenGO study protocol. BMC Public Health 23, 607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15516-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15516-y

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us