Skip to main content
Download PDF

Menstrual hygiene practice and associated factors among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 33 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Menstrual hygiene has not received adequate attention in Sub-Saharan Africa, and there is a lack of regional representative data. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices and associated factors among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

In this study, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used to develop the review manuscript. Online electronic databases, such as PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, and CINAHL, were searched to retrieve available studies. The database search was conducted from January 1 to May 17, 2022. The selection, quality assessment, and data extraction of the studies were performed. Quality assessment of the studies was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed based on country, study area, and sample size. Publication bias was examined by funnel plots and Egger’s test. The statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 14 software and RevMan software, and statistical significance was declared at a p value of less than 0.05.

Protocol registration number

CRD42020165628.

Results

A total of 229 studies were retrieved, and 14 studies were included in the final meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices was 45% (95% CI, (37, 53). Adolescents from urban residences (OR = 3.03, 95% CI (2.3, 3.97)), able to afford menstrual sanitary products (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.42, 3.3)), and from educated mothers (OR = 2.33, 95% CI (1.32, 4.12)) were associated with increased odds of good menstrual hygiene practice.

Conclusion

The pooled prevalence of menstrual hygiene practices was low compared to the SDG 6.2 target by 2030. “Achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations”. Therefore, improving the accessibility of a safe water supply, hygiene, sanitation facilities and affordability of menstrual products and promoting maternal education are mandatory and should be part of government-level public health policy to prevent related health issues, loss of economic output and education opportunities.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Menstruation is a physiological process that occurs among girls and women [1]. Menstrual hygiene management (MHM) practice is described as using clean menstrual management material, washing the body as needed with soap and water, and having access to facilities to dispose of used materials [2].

Worldwide, inappropriate management of menstruation affects girls and women in developing countries [3, 4]. In developing countries, approximately 12.3% to 75% of girls cannot access or afford clean sanitary materials, and they use low-quality products such as new or old clothes, cotton wool, toilet paper, underwear alone, and sponges [5,6,7,8,9,10]. According to a United Nations International Children Emergency Fund (UNICEF) report, 10% of school-age African girls do not attend school during menstruation [11]. A study performed in five sub-Saharan African countries showed that the majority of adolescent girls reported a lack of safe, private, clean toilets and washing facilities at schools [9].

A review of the literature showed that factors associated with poor menstrual hygiene practice were lack of access to clean and effective absorbents, facilities to change, disposal of absorbents, soap, water, and privacy [3, 5, 12, 13]. In addition, consideration of menstruation as a taboo leads to fear and shame in discussions with other families and reduces young girls’ knowledge about menstrual hygiene practices. Even adult women may not be aware of the biological factors of good hygienic practices and may reduce their menstrual hygiene practices [14,15,16].

Poor menstrual hygiene practices have many consequences, including exposing adolescent girls and women to reproductive organ and urogenital infections, psychosocial stress, and reduced opportunities for accessing school and jobs [13, 17,18,19]. Studies have revealed that many school girls suffer from concentration and limited participation during class times due to discomfort and dishonor during menstruation [20,21,22].

In Sub-Saharan African countries, menstruation among school-age girls and women is a neglected issue. Adequate attention was not given by the water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), education sectors, or sexual and reproductive health programs, despite the formal inclusion of menstrual hygiene under reproductive health [23], and there are no regional representative data. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of menstrual hygiene practice and identify its associated factors among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa.

Methods

Study protocol registration and reporting

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to develop the systematic review and meta-analysis [24]. The PRISMA-P 2009 checklist was used to report the search process. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42020165628.

CoCoPop/PEO search guide

Condition: menstrual hygiene practice Context: sub-Saharan Africa Population: adolescent girl (10–19 years) [25]. Exposure: exposure is a determinant that increases or decreases the likelihood of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa. These factors include but are not limited to residence, age, maternal educational level, family income, menstrual flow duration, and knowledge of menses. Outcome measurement: The primary outcome of the study was the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices. Good menstrual hygiene practices were indicated when the studies reported overall good menstrual hygiene practices for the different measurements of menstrual hygiene practices (type of menstrual items used, maintenance of items if reusable or disposal if one-time use only, changing frequency, using clean menstrual management material to absorb or collect, washing the body as needed with soap, access to water, and disposal sites). The secondary outcome of the study was to identify determinates of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls. Event and control data were extracted from the original studies in the Microsoft Excel sheet and analysed using RevMan software. The criteria for selecting independent variables were how consistently and frequently they were reported in the primary studies. Accordingly, determinants reported in more than one study and having consistent classification were included.

Search strategy

The search strategies were performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Online electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and African Journal Online were used to search articles. The database search was conducted from January 1 to May 17, 2022. As Google Scholar generally retrieved a high number of articles whenever searched, for each of the search terms, we retrieved the first 10 pages. The retrieved studies were exported to Endnote version 8 reference manager software [26]. The procedure for the search and selection of studies was reported using the PRISMA diagram. A cross-reference search was performed to add other studies from the final included studies. Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and entry terms were searched from MeSH term databases. The search string was developed using Boolean operators (OR, AND), and modifications were made depending on the specific requirements of the database (Additional file 1).

Study selection and eligibility criteria

The two authors (EW and DK) independently screened the studies based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Duplicate, irrelevant titles and abstracts were removed. The relevant articles with the full text were further screened for quality appraisal. In the case of articles not open access, we contacted the corresponding author, and the articles were excluded for not responding authors. During the review of the studies, any disagreement among reviewers was resolved by further discussion. This study included all observational studies: cross-sectional, analytical cross-sectional, case–control, and cohort studies. Articles published only in English and studies that reported overall good menstrual hygiene practices and their associated factors were included. Moreover, a study that only reported overall good menstrual hygiene practices was included. Both institution- and community-based studies were included. We considered only quantitative results for studies that examined both quantitative and qualitative results. Case reports, conference reports, reviews and expert opinions were excluded. Restriction was not made to the date of study publication.

Quality assessments

Articles were assessed using their title, abstract, and a full text review before the inclusion of articles in the final meta-analysis. A critical appraisal was performed by two authors (EW and DK) using the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MASt-ARI) [27] (Additional file 2). Studies with a quality scale of 50% and above were included and considered for systematic review and meta-analysis. For any scoring disagreements between the authors, the sources of discrepancy were resolved with discussion.

Data extraction and management

After identifying all eligible articles, two independent reviewers (EW and DK) extracted the relevant data using an organized format on Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet 2016. Pretesting the data extraction form was performed before the beginning of the actual data extraction. In case variations of extracted data existed, the phase was repeated, and then discrepancies between data extractors were resolved by discussion. For the final included articles, we extracted the author name, year of publication, study area, study design, study period, sample size, response rate prevalence, study subjects, events and control data of the outcome variable. For any unclear data that might be encountered during data extraction, communication was made with the corresponding authors of the primary studies.

Data synthesis and analysis

The extracted data were imported into STATA version 14 software and extracted to RevMan software. Tables and figures were used to summarize random effects, and a narrative description of the included studies was performed. A random-effect model was used to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of menstrual hygiene practice and its determinants [28]. The existence of an association between the factors and menstrual hygiene practice was estimated based on the effect size, and the statistical significance level was declared at a p value of less than 0.05. We assessed heterogeneity by using the I2 statistic test [29]. I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% were representative of low, moderate, and significant heterogeneity, respectively. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed based on country and study area (community/school) characteristics to investigate sources of heterogeneity.

Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effects of the studies on the overall estimation, and publication bias was examined by the visual inspection of funnel plots [30] and Egger’s test [31]. A p value < 0.05 on Egger’s test was considered indicative of statistically significant publication bias.

Results

Study selection

A total of 229 studies were retrieved from the online electronic databases PubMed/Medline (n = 54), Google Scholar (n = 160), CINAHL (n = 6), and African Journal Online (n = 12). The titles, abstracts, and full texts of the studies were screened. Thirty-eight duplicated articles were removed, and 165 articles with irrelevant titles and abstracts were excluded for not related to the topic (n = 125), not conducted in sub-Saharan Africa (n = 21), duplication (n = 7), review (n = 5), and editorial (n = 5). Twenty-six full-text articles were assessed for quality appraisals, and 15 articles were excluded for not targeting the age group (n = 12), being an interventional study (n = 1) and not reporting the outcome variable (n = 2). Three articles were identified through a cross-reference search of the included studies, and two articles were identified from websites. Finally, 14 articles were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study selection for meta-analysis of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2022

Full size image

Quality appraisal

All included studies satisfied four out of eight JBI critical assessments (at least 50%). The requirements for inclusion were specified in fourteen studies. All included studies employed suitable statistical methods and confounding factor management strategies. Nevertheless, because all of the included studies were cross-sectional, this study was not able to identify confounding factors (Table 1). Moreover, studies were excluded during quality appraisal based on the inclusion criteria (Supplementary file Table 3).

Table 1 Quality appraisal of included studies based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool
Full size table

Characteristics of the included studies

A total of 14 cross-sectional studies with 7416 participants were included in the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies were published from 2015 to 2021 in different sub-Saharan African countries. Of the 14 studies, 9 studies were in Ethiopia [6, 32,33,34, 38,39,40, 42, 44], 3 studies were in Ghana [35, 36, 41], and 2 studies were in Nigeria [37, 43]. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 250 in Ghana [36] to 1,006 in Ethiopia [32]. The prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices ranges from 24.4% to 66.8% in Ethiopia [32, 40]. Moreover, 14 studies performed an analysis to identify factors associated with menstrual hygiene practice in Sub-Saharan Africa (Table 2).

Table 2 Summary characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis of menstrual hygiene practice in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2022
Full size table

The pooled prevalence of menstrual hygiene practices in Sub-Saharan Africa

The pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practice in Sub-Saharan Africa was 45% (95% CI, (37, 53), with significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 98.4%, p ≤ 0.001). The proportion of included studies ranged from 24% (95%, CI: 22, 27) [32] to 67% (95%, CI: 61, 72) [40] in Ethiopia (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot showing the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls in Sab-Saharan Africa, 2022

Full size image

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis was performed by country and study area characteristics, and studies performed in Ethiopia and school-based studies showed the source of heterogeneity (I2 ≥ 97.64, p ≤ 0.001). The pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices based on country was 45% in Ethiopia and 48% in Ghana (Table 3).

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for the prevalence of menstrual hygiene practice in Ethiopia, 2022
Full size table

Meta regression

Meta-regression was performed to identify the source of heterogeneity for the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices. Country, study area and sample size were considered, and none of them showed the source of heterogeneity (p value > 0.05) (Additional file 3: Table S1).

Publication bias

The presence of publication bias was checked using funnel plots, and visual inspection of the funnel plot suggested symmetry, as seven studies were on the right side and seven studies were on the left side (Additional file 4: Figure S1). Moreover, publication bias was not shown by Egger’s test (p = 0.754) (Additional file 5: Table S2).

Determinants of menstrual hygiene practice in sub-Saharan Africa

In this study, 8 studies [6, 32,33,34, 36, 38, 44, 48] were included in the analysis of determinants of menstrual hygiene practice. Five factors were assessed for meta-analysis, and high heterogeneity was observed for age, maternal education, and knowledge factors. Determinants that were assessed for menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa included two articles on residence (1,075 participants), [33, 34], five articles on age (3,006 participants) [6, 32, 36, 38, 44], three articles on maternal educational status (2,214 participants) [32, 34, 44], five articles on knowledge status (2,825 participants), [6, 33, 34, 38, 44], and three articles on the affordability of menstrual equipment (1,614 participants), [36, 44, 48].

In this study, adolescent girls from urban settings who were able to afford menstrual sanitary products and from educated mothers were associated with good menstrual hygiene practices. The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls from urban settings were 3.03 times higher than those among adolescent girls from rural settings (OR = 3.03, 95% CI (2.3, 3.97)) (Fig. 3). The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls who were able to afford menstrual sanitary products were 2.17 times higher than those among adolescent girls who were not able to afford menstrual sanitary products (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.42, 3.3)) (Fig. 4). The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls from educated mothers were 2.33 times higher than those among their counterparts (OR = 2.33, 95% CI (1.32, 4.12)) (Fig. 5). In this study, the age and knowledge of the participants were statistically insignificant (Fig. 6 and Fig. 7, respectively).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot showing the association between residence and menstrual hygiene practice in Sab-Saharan Africa

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot showing the association between the affordability and menstrual hygiene practice in Sab-Saharan Africa

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot showing the association between the maternal education and menstrual hygiene practice in Sab-Saharan Africa

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest plot showing the the association between age and menstrual hygiene practice in Sab-Saharan Africa

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Forest plot showing the association between knowledge and menstrual hygiene practice in Sub-Sahara Africa

Full size image

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practice and its associated factors in sub-Saharan Africa. Poor menstrual hygiene practices affect the health of millions of adolescent girls in developing countries [49, 50]. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review or meta-analysis has been conducted on the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practices and their associated factors in Sub-Saharan Africa. Moreover, there are inconsistent findings on menstrual hygiene practice in sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis will help policy-makers, programmers, planners, clinicians, and researchers design appropriate strategies.

In this study, the pooled prevalence of good menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls was 45% (95% CI (37, 53)). This finding was in line with studies conducted in India, 45% [51], Nepal, 40% [52], and Lao PDR, 44% [53]. However, the pooled prevalence was lower than that in the Dang District of Nepal, 67.0% [54]. The difference might be due to differences in sample size, study setting, study period, availability, and access to health services.

The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls from urban settings were 3.03 times higher than those among adolescent girls from rural settings (OR = 3.03, 95% CI (2.3, 3.97)). This was consistent with studies performed in India [55] and low-income countries [8]. It might be the fact that girls in rural areas of developing countries have limited awareness of menstrual hygiene management and face substantial challenges in different settings [56]. Moreover, there is a lack of accessibility and affordability to sanitary products, functional latrines, safe water supply, hygiene, and sanitation facilities in rural areas [21, 57,58,59,60,61].

The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls who were able to afford menstrual sanitary products were 2.17 times higher than those among adolescent girls who were not able to afford menstrual sanitary products (OR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.42, 3.3)). This was consistent with studies performed in India [62]. This might be because girls who have access to money from their parents can buy sanitary napkins. It has been noted that girls from low-income families lack access to menstrual hygiene facilities, and the cost of sanitary products is one of the main barriers to good menstrual hygiene practices during menstruation [62].

The odds of menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent girls from educated mothers were 2.33 times higher than those among their counterparts (OR = 2.33, 95% CI (1.32, 4.12)). This was consistent with other studies [63, 64]. This might be because as societal taboos and stigma challenge traditional social norms, mothers are the main source of information on menstrual hygiene for adolescents [65]. Moreover, adolescent girls in developing countries often grow up with limited knowledge of menstruation and low male involvement to support menstrual hygiene management for their wives and daughters [9, 15, 66].

This study has the following limitations. Heterogeneity and articles published in languages other than English were not considered. In this review, the outcome variable might be affected by other confounding variables, as all studies were cross-sectional. In this study, only three countries (Ethiopia, Ghana and Nigeria) were included, representing only a small proportion of sub-Saharan African countries. Additional database searches, such as Scopus and EMBASE, were not performed due to the lack of free access, and we recommend funding to expand database searches. Relevant studies may be missed, as we retrieved the first 10 pages in Google Scholar. Despite these limitations, we performed a comprehensive search of studies from databases, gray literature, and cross-referencing of included studies to include all relevant studies.

Conclusion

The pooled prevalence of menstrual hygiene practice was low compared to the SDG 6.2 target by 2030. “Achieve access to adequate and equitable sanitation and hygiene for all, paying special attention to the needs of women and girls and those in vulnerable situations”. Therefore, improving the accessibility of a safe water supply, hygiene, sanitation facilities and affordability of menstrual products and promoting maternal education are mandatory and should be part of government-level public health policy to prevent related health issues, loss of economic output and education opportunities.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during the current study are included in this manuscript and its supplementary information files. Any further requests for data are available with the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PROSPERO:

International Prospective Register of systematic Reviews

CRD:

Clinical data repository

CINAHL:

Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied health literature

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

MHM:

Menstrual hygiene management

UNICEF:

United Nations International Children Emergency Fund

WASH:

Water, sanitation, and hygiene

PRISMA:

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis

STATA:

Statistical software for data science

MeSH:

Medical Subject Heading

JBI-MASt-ARI:

Joanna Briggs Institute Meta-Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument; I2: square statistics

SRH:

Sexual and reproductive health

References

  1. Winkler IT, Roaf V. Taking the bloody linen out of the closet: menstrual hygiene as a priority for achieving gender equality. Cardozo JL & Gender. 2014;21:1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Biran A, Curtis V, et al. Background paper on measuring WASH and food hygiene practices: definition of goals to be tackled post 2015 by the joint monitoring programme. London Sch Hyg Trop Med. 2012;2012:81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sommer M, Caruso BA, et al. A time for global action: addressing girls’ menstrual hygiene management needs in schools. PLoS Med. 2016;13(2):e1001962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sommer M, Sahin M. Overcoming the taboo: advancing the global agenda for menstrual hygiene management for schoolgirls. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(9):1556–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Enzler, DM, Knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) of adolescents in rural primary schools in Malawi. 2019.

  6. Fisseha MA, Kebede Y, et al. Menstrual hygiene practice and associated factors among secondary school girls in Wegera District, Northwest Ethiopia; a cross-sectional study. Computational Biology and Bioinformatics. 2017;5(1):6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geertz, A, An opportunity to address menstrual health and gender equity. 2016: FSG.

  8. Kuhlmann AS, Henry K, et al. Menstrual hygiene management in resource-poor countries. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2017;72(6):356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tamiru, S, Mamo K, et al., Towards a sustainable solution for school menstrual hygiene management: cases of Ethiopia, Uganda, South-Sudan, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. Waterlines, 2015: p. 92–102.

  10. Mudey AB, Kesharwani N, et al. A cross-sectional study on awareness regarding safe and hygienic practices amongst school going adolescent girls in rural area of Wardha District, India. Global J Health Sci. 2010;2(2):225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Education, P, Menstrual Hygiene Management—UNESCO Digital Library. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France, 2014.

  12. Mason L, Nyothach E, et al. ‘We keep it secret so no one should know’–A qualitative study to explore young schoolgirls attitudes and experiences with menstruation in rural Western Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips-Howard PA, Caruso B, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent schoolgirls in low-and middle-income countries: research priorities. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):33032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chothe V, Khubchandani J, et al. Students’ perceptions and doubts about menstruation in developing countries: a case study from India. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(3):319–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. House S, Mahon T, et al. Menstrual hygiene matters: a resource for improving menstrual hygiene around the world. Reprod Health Matters. 2013;21(41):257–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sommer M, Sutherland C, et al. Putting menarche and girls into the global population health agenda. Reprod Health. 2015;12(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker K, Dutta A, et al. Menstrual Hygiene Practices, WASH Access and the Risk of Urogenital Infection in Women from Odisha. India: Supporting Information; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hulland KR, Chase RP, et al. Sanitation, stress, and life stage: a systematic data collection study among women in Odisha, India. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(11):e0141883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathiyalagen P, Peramasamy B, et al. A descriptive cross-sectional study on menstrual hygiene and perceived reproductive morbidity among adolescent girls in a union territory, India. Journal of family medicine and primary care. 2017;6(2):360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boosey R, Prestwich G, et al. Menstrual hygiene management amongst schoolgirls in the Rukungiri district of Uganda and the impact on their education: a cross-sectional study. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;19:253.

  21. Hennegan J, Dolan C, et al. Measuring the prevalence and impact of poor menstrual hygiene management: a quantitative survey of schoolgirls in rural Uganda. BMJ. 2016;6(12):e012596.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tegegne TK, Sisay MM. Menstrual hygiene management and school absenteeism among female adolescent students in Northeast Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2014;14(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ssewanyana D, Bitanihirwe BKY. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Promot. 2019;26(1):105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moher D, Liberati A, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nation, U, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) 2007.

  26. Bramer W, Bain P. Updating search strategies for systematic reviews using EndNote. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2017;105(3):285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Munn Z, Tufanaru C, et al. JBI’s systematic reviews: data extraction and synthesis. AJN The American Journal of Nursing. 2014;114(7):49–54.

  28. Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, et al. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat Med. 1995;14(4):395–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu JL. The role of the funnel plot in detecting publication and related biases in meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent. 2011;12(4):121–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Egger M, Smith GD, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Azage, M, Ejigu T, et al., Menstrual hygiene management practices and associated factors among urban and rural adolescents in Bahir Dar city administration, northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Reprod Health. 2018;10(4).

  33. Bulto GA. Knowledge on Menstruation and Practice of Menstrual Hygiene Management Among School Adolescent Girls in Central Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohammed Gena, H, Menstrual hygiene management practices and associated factors among secondary school girls in East Hararghe Zone, Eastern Ethiopia. Advances in Public Health, 2020. 2020.

  35. Boakye-Yiadom A, Aladago DA, et al. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of menstrual hygiene management among junior high schools adolescent females in the Yendi Municipality in the northern region of Ghana. European Scientific Journal, ESJ. 2018;14(36):467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammed S, Larsen-Reindorf RE, et al. Menstrual Hygiene Management and School Absenteeism among Adolescents in Ghana: Results from a School-Based Cross-Sectional Study in a Rural Community. Int J Reprod Med. 2020;2020:6872491. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6872491.

  37. Fehintola FO, Fehintola AO, et al. Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practice about menstruation and menstrual hygiene among secondary high school girls in Ogbomoso, Oyo state, Nigeria. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(5):1726–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Belayneh Z, Mekuriaw B. Knowledge and menstrual hygiene practice among adolescent school girls in southern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Anchebi H, Shiferaw B, et al. Practice of menstrual hygiene and associated factors among female high school students in adama town. J Women’s Health Care. 2017;6(370):2167–420.

  40. Serbesa ML, Iffa SMT. Assessment of menstrual hygiene practices and its associated factors among adolescent students in Batu High School in Batu Town, East Shewa, Ethiopia: a descriptive school-based cross-sectional study. Journal of Health and Medical Sciences. 2018;1(1):71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kumbeni MT, Otupiri E, et al. Menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls in junior high schools in rural northern Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37:190. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.37.190.19015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Upashe SP, Tekelab T, et al. Assessment of knowledge and practice of menstrual hygiene among high school girls in Western Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nnennaya EU, Atinge S, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent school girls in Taraba State. Nigeria Afr Health Sci. 2021;21(2):842–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Habtegiorgis Y, Sisay T, et al. Menstrual hygiene practices among high school girls in urban areas in Northeastern Ethiopia: A neglected issue in water, sanitation, and hygiene research. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0248825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248825.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Boakye-Yiadom A, Aladago DA, et al. Assessing the knowledge, attitude and practice of menstrual hygiene management among junior high schools adolescent females in the Yendi Municipality in the northern region of Ghana. Eur Sci J. 2018;14:36.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mohammed, S, Larsen-Reindorf RE, et al., Menstrual Hygiene Management and School Absenteeism among Adolescents in Ghana: Results from a School-Based Cross-Sectional Study in a Rural Community. International journal of reproductive medicine, 2020. 2020.

  47. Kumbeni MT, Otupiri E, et al. Menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls in junior high schools in rural northern Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2020;37:190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Upashe SP, Tekelab T, et al. Assessment of knowledge and practice of menstrual hygiene among high school girls in Western Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0245-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Adinma ED, Adinma J. Perceptions and practices on menstruation amongst Nigerian secondary school girls. Afr J Reprod Health. 2008;12(1):74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bairwa M, Rajput M, et al. Modified Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic scale: social researcher should include updated income criteria, 2012. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2013;38(3):185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Eijk AM, Sivakami M, et al. Menstrual hygiene management among adolescent girls in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(3):e010290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yadav RN, Joshi S, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice on menstrual hygiene management among school adolescents. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017;15(3):212–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sychareun V, Chaleunvong K, et al. Menstruation practice among school and out-of-school adolescent girls, Lao PDR. Glob Health Action. 2020;13(sup2):1785170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Bhusal, CK, Practice of menstrual hygiene and associated factors among adolescent school girls in Dang district, Nepal. Adv. Prev. Med., 2020. 2020.

  55. Sharma S, Mehra D, et al. Menstrual hygiene preparedness among schools in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis of system-and policy-level actions. Int J Env Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kaur, R, Kaur K, et al., Menstrual hygiene, management, and waste disposal: practices and challenges faced by girls/women of developing countries. J. Environ. Public Health, 2018. 2018.

  57. Cardoso LF, Clark CJ, et al. Menstrual restriction prevalence and association with intimate partner violence among Nepali women. BMJ sexual & reproductive health. 2019;45(1):38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Chandra-Mouli, V and Patel SV, Mapping the knowledge and understanding of menarche, menstrual hygiene and menstrual health among adolescent girls in low-and middle-income countries. The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies, 2020: p. 609–636.

  59. Ivanova O, Rai M, et al. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study of sexual and reproductive health knowledge, experiences and access to services among refugee adolescent girls in the Nakivale refugee settlement. Uganda Reproductive health. 2019;16(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Myers A, Sami S, et al. Facilitators and barriers in implementing the Minimum Initial Services Package (MISP) for reproductive health in Nepal post-earthquake. Confl Heal. 2018;12(1):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schmitt ML, Clatworthy D, et al. Understanding the menstrual hygiene management challenges facing displaced girls and women: findings from qualitative assessments in Myanmar and Lebanon. Confl Heal. 2017;11(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Omidvar, S and Begum K, Factors influencing hygienic practices during menses among girls from south India-A cross sectional study. Int J Collab Res Intern Med Public Health. 2010;2(12).

  63. Mohammed S, Larsen-Reindorf RE. Menstrual knowledge, sociocultural restrictions, and barriers to menstrual hygiene management in Ghana: Evidence from a multi-method survey among adolescent schoolgirls and schoolboys. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0241106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ekeanyanwu, UC and Agbede CO, EFFECT OF PEER-LED AND PARENT-LED EDUCATION INTERVENTIONS ON MENSTRUAL HYGIENE-RELATED KNOWLEDGE OF IN-SCHOOL ADOLESCENT GIRLS IN OGUN STATE, NIGERIA. 2020.

  65. Sahin M. Guest editorial: tackling the stigma and gender marginalization related to menstruation via WASH in schools programmes. Waterlines. 2015;34(1):3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Mahon, T, Tripathy A, et al., Putting the men into menstruation: the role of men and boys in community menstrual hygiene management. Waterlines, 2015: p. 7–14.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Samara University for the HINARY database website and network access.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health, College of Medical and Health Sciences, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia

    Etsay Woldu Anbesu & Dejen Kahsay Asgedom

Authors
  1. Etsay Woldu Anbesu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dejen Kahsay Asgedom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Investigation: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Methodology: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom, Software: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Validation: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom, Formal analysis: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Investigation: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom, Resources: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom, Data curation: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom. Visualization: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom, Writing – original draft: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Writing – review & editing: Etsay Woldu Anbesu, Dejen Kahsay Asgedom. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etsay Woldu Anbesu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors do not have competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Database search MeSH terms and entry terms

Additional file 2. 

JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Meta-regression analysis of factors with menstrual hygiene practice in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2022

Additional file 4: Figure S1

Funnel plots to test the publication bias of the 14 studies, 2022

Additional file 5:

Table S2. Publication bias using Egger’s test on menstrual hygiene among adolescents in sub Saharan Africa, 2022

Additional file 6: Supplementary file Table 3.

Quality appraisal of excluded studies

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anbesu, E.W., Asgedom, D.K. Menstrual hygiene practice and associated factors among adolescent girls in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 23, 33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14942-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14942-8

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us