Skip to main content

Exploring arts-based interventions for youth substance use prevention: a scoping review of literature

Abstract

Introduction

There is a rise in problematic substance use among Canadian youth, which is precipitating a public health crisis. Interventions are needed to empower youth to mitigate substance use risks. Active youth involvement in substance use prevention is urgently needed to increase uptake and ownership of the process and outcome of the intervention. Arts-based interventions are ideal participatory action approaches that can empower young people to be active agents in substance use prevention. These approaches can help promote health, reduce harm, and change behaviours. Scoping reviews are a vital tool that can help the research team identify relevant interventions that can be adapted to a community.

Methods

This scoping review explores various arts-based substance use prevention interventions for youth. The scoping review used the iterative stages of Arksey and O’Malley to search Portal ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, C.I.N.A.H.L., E.M.B.A.S.E., Web of Science, and A.P.A. PsycInfo and grey literature from Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction and websites suggested by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Inclusion criteria are a) articles utilizing arts-based intervention on substance use prevention; b) studies with a clearly defined intervention; c) intervention targeting the youth (age 12–17) and d) publications written in English. Thematic analysis was used to identify the main themes from the included articles.

Results and discussion

Themes identified in a thematic synthesis of these studies included a) the intent of the intervention; b) intervention characteristics; and c) the perceived effectiveness of interventions. Art-based interventions increased knowledge and changed attitudes and practices on substance use among youth. Making the interventions aesthetically appealing and engaging, active youth involvement in the development of the intervention and developing youth-centred interventions which attended to the realities they faced were central to the success of these interventions.

Peer Review reports

Background

The use of illicit and licit substances such as alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, methamphetamines and opioids, continues to be a public health crisis in Canada [1]. Substance use has adverse effects on the quality of life of individuals and families while putting economic strain on society, costing over $46 billion, including $13.1 billion in health care costs [2, 3]. Substance use amongst youth in Canada is a growing problem. In 2017, nearly half of Canadian students in grades 7 to 12 (44%) reported consuming alcoholic beverages, and about 374,000 students in grades 7 to 12 (18%) reported using cannabis [4].

Prince Albert Saskatchewan has one of the highest youth substance use nationally, with a community report suggesting that about 73.8% of grade 10–12 students consume alcohol, which is 11% more than the national average [5]. Binge drinking among school-aged children in Prince Albert Region is estimated to be 67.9%, nearly 20% higher than the national average [6]. Moreover, children in the Prince Albert region are exposed to alcohol and drug use at an early age; from six to eleven years for alcohol, marijuana, opiates, and cocaine [7]. Consequences of this substance use are missing school, mental health, engagement with the criminal justice system and delinquency [7].

To address substance use among youth in this region, a consultative meeting comprising stakeholders in education, social and health sectors met in February 2018. This event led to a successful Collaborative Innovative Development grant from the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation to actively engage affected youth in a photovoice project where school-going youth were to take photos to document their experiences and risks of substance use in their community. Due to public health measures occasioned by the COVID-19 pandemic, since photovoice is a form of an art-based intervention, undertaking a scoping review on art-based intervention would provide the research team with a diversity of interventions that could be implemented at a later date. Also, art-based interventions tend to actively engage youth in the research as change agents, a practice that has a positive impact on substance use prevention programs, thereby reducing substance use rates and overall morbidity and mortality [8].

Arts-based interventions use art as a medium to improve a process or a situation, especially one that involves emotional and psychological well-being [9]. Such interventions may include photography, poetic language, sculpture, painting, craft, music, and dance and can aid in the healing process and restoration [10]. Arts-based interventions focus on participants’ knowledge, experiences, and contributions by establishing an interactive environment and empowering dialogues between participants and their environments [11]. Arts-based interventions are widely used to promote health, reduce harm and change behaviours [12]. Art-Based interventions also provide an opportunity for participants to express their negative emotions and can help improve participants’ self-esteem and social inclusion [13, 14].

When used as substance use prevention interventions, art-based programs encourage youth participation, create an inclusive and safe environment and strengthen their power to face substance use issues [15]. Therefore, they can be empowerment tools that can help mitigate the risks of substance use thereby complementing other approaches for preventing and managing substance use disorders [16].Through art-based interventions, youth are empowered to resist substance use initiation by increasing knowledge, changing behaviours, and establishing self-confidence and self-esteem [17, 18].

This scoping review is intended to provide insight into how arts-based interventions for youth substance are designed and their perceived effectiveness. Information gathered from such a scoping review has the potential to provide insight to policymakers, program developers, and researchers with interventions surrounding substance use prevention for youth [19]. The findings of the scoping review will be presented to community stakeholders and will form the basis of the development of community-led culturally safe substance use prevention interventions for youth.

Methods

A scoping review is undertaken to examine the extent, scope, and nature of research topics and identify gaps in the current literature [20]. This scoping review followed the steps identified by Arksey & O’Malley [21] and the results are reported using P.R.I.S.M.A. guidelines developed by Tricco et al., [22].

Stage 1: identifying the research question

This review was based on three research questions: 1) What is known about arts-based interventions that prevent youth substance use; 2) What are the characteristics and study outcomes of these interventions, and 3) what are the perceived effectiveness of these interventions in preventing substance use among the youth?

Stage 2: identifying relevant studies

Based on suggestions of a Health Sciences Librarian, researchers drafted the search strategy which centred on five keywords, including “arts-based”, “youth”, “substance use”, “intervention”, and “prevention.“ Databases, including ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, C.I.N.A.H.L., E.M.B.A.S.E., Web of Science, and A.P.A. PsycInfo, were used to search for literature. Additionally, following the University of Toronto’s Grey literature searching guidelines, the team searched for grey literature from the websites suggested by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health [23].

Inclusion criteria

The following four inclusion criteria were used to guide the screening of the articles to be included in the review: a) articles that used arts-based methods to prevent substance use among youth; b) studies that have a clearly defined intervention; c) studies that target youth 12- to 17-year-old; and d) written in English.

Exclusion criteria

Articles that were not written in English, whose focus was not on arts-based to prevent substance use, and those focussing outside of the age group 12 to 17 were excluded from the study. Also removed from the study are non-research publications such as reviews and letters to the editor.

Stage 3- article selection

All articles sought from databases were input into Rayyan, an online platform that is used to screen and sort large numbers of references for inclusion in a review [24]. Two research team members- a postdoc and a research assistant identified and deleted duplicates and then independently screened articles for inclusion. A third person was involved to break a tie where there was no congruency regarding the inclusion or exclusion of an article or report. The screening process is summarised in the Prisma Diagram (Fig. 1).

A data extraction table was used to summarise the articles that were included in the scoping review using the following columns: article, study purpose, the intervention, Youth involvement, targeted level of intervention and implications for practice. Table 1 is a compilation of the studies that were included in the review.

Table 1 Compilation of the included articles

Stage 5- collating, summarizing, and reporting the results

The research team synthesized the collated findings by identifying common threads within the data. Rich narratives were developed to expound these threads that were thereafter designated as themes. P.R.I.S.M.A.‘s guidelines were used to report the screening process and its results. Thematic analysis, which entails familiarisation, coding, searching for themes, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes, and writing the report was applied [25].

Stage 6- consulting

Presentations of the findings shall be made to community partners and stakeholders in the affected region after which an envisioning exercise shall ensue on how best to adapt the findings of the study to address substance use among the youth in the region.

Results

Nineteen articles were included in this scoping review featuring diverse art-based interventions used to prevent substance use among youth.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prisma diagram

Of these, nine used videos, six used theatre/acting modalities, a videogame and a photovoice project, respectively. Three themes were identified and are; a) the focus of the interventions; b) intervention vehicle characteristics; and c) why they were successful with the youth.

Theme 1: The intent of the intervention

This theme focuses on what the intervention was intended to achieve to prevent substance use among youth. These interventions were designed to increase knowledge and change attitudes and practices on substance use. Changes in attitudes and practices were achieved through life skills training where youth were taught how to prevent substance use through the development of intrapersonal and interpersonal skills. Intrapersonal skills include improved decision-making skills, self-control, and strategies for dealing with anxiety or internal risks that would increase proclivities to substance use [26]. These skills increased the youth’s efficacy to manage risks associated with substance use [27] by fostering cultural identity and awareness [28]), and by imparting skills to make better choices that reduce substance use [29].

When participants developed interpersonal skills as a result of engaging with the intervention, they are empowered to challenge and resist potential danger posed by peers’ intent on introducing a substance to them. In so doing, they effectively dealt with substance use risks that confront them [30,31,32]. Refuse, explain, avoid, and leave (REAL) and assertiveness training was intended to reject substance use and peer pressure and to reinforce conservative attitudes towards substance use while reinforcing cultural identities [28, 33, 34] Subsequently, the youth were empowered to refuse invitations to use substances from friends, overcome peer pressure [35], and be prepared for real-world experiences [36].

Knowledge impartation was another focus of the interventions which entailed providing information on immediate and long-term impacts of substance use, regulations surrounding the use of alcohol and driving [37], and how to make better choices in risky environments [27, 29]. Other interventions provided advice on how to make socially acceptable responses when confronted with the offer of substances [34]. These interventions empowered the youth to critically think about the choices they made, and the impact of their decisions and endeavour to develop safe behaviours [37,38,39].

Theme 2: Intervention characteristics

Intervention characteristics describe the mode of art-based interventions that were used in the substance use prevention project. In this review, we note that videos and live performances were the main modes that were used to deliver substance use prevention content to youth. Bonyani et al., [26] project used a video clip containing stories of people with lived experiences using substances. This approach increased awareness of commonly abused substances in Iran and the risk factors that predispose youth to substance use and the negative consequences associated with it. Hecht et al.‘s, [33] intervention utilized narrative accounts of personal resistance experiences which were categorized into the Refuse, Explain, Ask and Leave (REAL) strategy and thereafter adapted to a film where actors were coached to perform in a musical docudrama and the action was transferred to a film. The film was made in such a way that it appealed to teens.

Warren et al.‘s [40] project entailed creating a video by a local middle school performing arts group. The students conducted their interviews covering the four resistance strategies- Refuse, Explain, Ask and Leave (REAL) and thereafter took control of production, casting, music, dance, set, and postproduction. Duncan’s project [27] used information from focus group discussions with students to develop six vignettes to guide video production. Each vignette included a realistic and common situation relevant to refusal skills training for offers of marijuana. The refuse-to-use video was developed to get the youth to start thinking and communicating about drug use and peer pressure.

Williams et al., [41] project used a video intervention recorded on a CD-ROM modelled after Life Skills Training (L.S.T.) to teach general social skills, personal self-management skills, and resistance skills. It consisted of 10 sessions designed to be used in school and at home. The content was engaging using interactive audio and video content. Hardoff, Stoffman & Ziv [42] project used enacted scenarios performed by professional actors. They portrayed risky situations that a 15-year-old girl encounters with her 17-year boyfriend at a party. The boyfriend forces her to do things she does not want to do. Students then engage in a discussion regarding their feelings about the behaviours of the young couple. Quek et al.‘s, [29] applied a 50-minute theatre prevention program performed by volunteer students to encourage them to make better choices about how they party and behave during “schoolies”. The safety message embedded within skits, contemporary pop culture, and music was followed by a 20-minute discussion forum with student actors.

Turner-Musa et al.‘s, [32] intervention is a 10-lesson afterschool substance abuse and H.I.V. prevention live action using the contextual framework of youth popular culture. The intervention was implemented as a series of 10 two-hour sessions focusing on self-efficacy, norms, belief clarification, conflict resolution, and resistance. Duryea’s [35] project used role-playing exercises where students read prepared scripts which entailed enactment of situations where they were pressured to partake in risky behaviours. van Leeuwen et al.‘s, [37] project comprised 11 single-story episodes comprising of its storyline, characters, settings, theme and look and feel. Seven of these episodes focused on alcohol with the remainder focusing on other drugs. Huang et al.‘s, [36] intervention comprised six sessions of 45 min each, implemented over six weeks. It was made of warm-up activities, drama activities, a conclusion, and reflection. The drama activity entailed enactment, re-enactment, role-playing and acting the dialogue and scenario to integrate different components of life skills.

Safer & Harding, [43] project is a 32-minute theatre called Captain Clean comprised of the following content- general health concerns associated with drug and alcohol, dating relationships, peer/friend relationships, parent/family relationships, and counselling action. de Visser et al.‘s, [38] project entailed developing an 11-minute video called ‘hitting the sweet spot’ to promote responsible drinking among young people aimed at helping individuals critically think about personal and social expectations and practices related to substance use.

Theme 3: Perceived effectiveness of interventions

In each project included in this review, the researcher evaluated the impact of the proposed intervention. In this theme, we report what these researchers reported as the perceived effectiveness of the implemented project. Many factors determined the perceived effectiveness of the interventions. These include-aesthetic appeal qualities, the ability to increase agency and active youth involvement. Presentations were deemed effective by the youth as the content and the presentations were found to be attractive to them and directly relevant and relatable. Most programs had a component that had a direct engagement with youth. For instance, in Hecht’s et al., [33] intervention, youth reflected, discussed, and provided input following the live performances. Polansky’s [34] intervention taught assertiveness skills which applied to them. Warren et al., [40] intervention comprised a structured curriculum which increased their knowledge. Stanley et al., [28] reinforced cultural identity and aspirations through photovoice. Duncan et al., [27] and Shin et al., [31] interventions sought to develop refusal skills, while Williams et al., [41] project sought to change attitudes towards drugs. Hardoff et al., [42] project empowered the youth through knowledge acquisition.

Active youth engagement was regarded as an important component for evaluating program effectiveness and took various forms. Youth were appealed to programs that allowed their voices to be heard through, implementation, discussions, and consultations were of great appeal to them [29, 35, 36] Stanley et al., [28] and Turner-Musa et al., [32]incorporated cultural elements into substance use prevention, which reinforced the identity of the participants. Duncan et al., [27] sought to appeal to their cognition and emotions, while van Leeuwen et al., [37] project used characters and settings that are relatable to youth. Other interventions were grounded in the lived experiences of people who were negatively impacted by substance use [33].

Discussions

This scoping review aims at exploring arts-based interventions for preventing substance use among youth. Based on the results included in the review, it is evident that most intervention programs focus on changing perceptions, gaining refusal skills, and reducing potential harm brought by using substances. Behaviour change requires gaining knowledge, shifting attitudes, and the formation of behaviour patterns [27]. It is therefore imperative that youth be equipped with knowledge and skills to respond in social situations with increased risk for substance use [31].

To impact change the desired change in participants, the program appealed to their cognition, affect and behaviours, whose import can be appreciated by using the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (K.A.P.) theory, which can explain how individuals change behaviours. It posits that with knowledge acquisition, one has a greater inclination to change attitudes, which in turn may change behaviour [44]. Important knowledge includes not only that the harms associated with substances but also social scenarios and refusal skills when offered substances by peers [45]. To impart knowledge, the education materials must be interesting and engaging [36].

Active engagement of youth through a program that used videogames, movies, dramas and live performances with key messages on substance use was reported to be effective in capturing youth’s attention [26, 27, 32, 36, 40]. Moreover, active participation in the programs, such as through discussions, role-playing, reflections, and interviews can be effective in retaining youth interest. Knowledge can also be imparted to the youth through sharing of lived experiences on the impacts of substance use. Subsequently, youth can be empowered to engage and be in charge of their lives [46]. Empowering youth to express and create in ways that are meaningful to them enhances their cultural identity, which may also be protective against substance use [47]. Also, it helps young people to share their experiences, thoughts, and creativity [15].

The uniqueness of using art as a vehicle to deliver messages on substance use prevention is in its ability to make the intervention engaging, relaxing, fun, and helpful [48]. For the art interventions to be effective, the developer must consider the needs of the youth within their context and be relatable to their lives, culture, and experiences [32, 33]. Such a design makes it easy for the youth to be engaged and invested in the project. Developing youth-centred intervention programs ensure that they are modelled with common risks that youth face. Youth face pressures of tumultuous identity-seeking amidst constant media messaging, significant developmental changes, and ease of substance availability [49].

To ensure that an art-based program is relevant to the targeted youth, it is imperative to be cognizant of the other risks that they face. For instance, mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and bipolar are strongly associated with substance use [50]. Given that adolescence is a developmental phase where various mental health issues begin to present, this age is an optimal time to identify, diagnose, and manage mental illness or substance use concerns for the best outcomes [51]. A mental health support system must be in place as a form of substance use prevention measure. Actively engaging youth in intervention programs is critical to their success [34]. For example, in Be Under Your Own Influence strategy, Stanley et al., [28] observed that the active engagement of program beneficiaries is key to its success. This collaboration enhances programs’ effectiveness and builds the capacity to enhance agency to prevent substance use and lead to social change and development.

Throughout this scoping review, significant lessons can be learned about developing interventions for youth substance use prevention. First, impacting life skills training can have a positive impact on youth agencies to resist substance offers and thereby prevent substance use. Equipping youth with the skills and knowledge to make informed decisions about their actions is vital to prevent substance use. A preponderance of research has shown that prevention programs aimed at increasing social skills and providing positive support can be effective in reducing substance use among youth [52, 53]. Prevention programs that focus on social resistance skills training teach youth to identify social situations in which they are likely to be exposed to substance use, and how to avoid these high-risk situations. Such resistance training and problem-solving skills enable them to make good and informed decisions [45].

Conclusion

Creative expressions such as art, videos, drama, and photovoice provide individuals with a medium to explore their thoughts, emotions, behaviours and actions [54]. Successful interventions must attend to the setting and characters of the community in which they seek to develop programs, including cultural identity, and the prevalent substances. Cultural sensitivity is an effective public health strategy which can greatly impact the outcomes of an intervention [55]. In addition, the intervention must be relatable to those it is meant to benefit [56,57,58]. This includes featuring characters and settings that are like the target community [59]. Youth need to be actively involved in any intervention concerning them. This involvement fosters ownership of the process and the outcome, hence increasing its efficacy [27, 40, 60]. The interventions must be intellectually and aesthetically stimulating. Programs directed at preventing youth substance use should be appealing and contemporary in nature [32, 61].

Effective youth substance use prevention interventions should use relevant language and audiovisual content familiar to them [15, 45]. Delivering prevention information through technological tools including CD-ROM and other electronic media can produce behavioural change among the youth [27, 41, 62] Care should be employed when adapting these programs as some studies have found some such as D.A.R.E. to be ineffective in substance use prevention when replicated in diverse settings [63, 64].

Limitations of the review

This scoping review used rigorous and transparent methods throughout the entire process to retrieve several articles to answer the research questions. Multiple keywords were searched from selected electronic databases. The study had some limitations, notwithstanding these. As applies to most scoping reviews, this study did not assess the quality of the various studies. Since only articles published in English were included, potentially relevant articles may have been omitted from this study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SUD:

Substance Use Disorder

C.C.S.A.:

Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction

C.A.D.T.H.:

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

REAL:

Refuse, explain, avoid, and leave

L.S.T.:

Life Skills Training

K.A.P.:

knowledge, attitudes, and practices

P.T.S.D.:

Post-traumatic stress disorder

References

  1. Wiercigroch D, Sheikh H, Hulme J. A rapid access to addiction medicine clinic facilitates treatment of substance use disorder and reduces substance use. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020;15(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-019-0250-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Canadian Substance Use Costs and Harms. National Landscape for the Costs of Substance Use in Canada. 2020. https://csuch.ca/resources/national/.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Canadian Centre on Substance Use and Addiction. Ethical youth engagement for substance use prevention campaigns. 2021. https://www.ccsa.ca/sites/default/files/2019-05/CCSA-2013-Ethical-Youth-Engagement-en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Health Canada. Summary of results for the canadian student tobacco, alcohol and drugs survey 2018-19. Open Government Portal; 2021. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/canadian-student-tobacco-alcohol-drugs-survey/2018-2019-summary.html.

  5. Community Alcohol Strategy Steering Committee. Prince Albert and area community alcohol strategy. 2016. https://www.srsd119.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/PI_RL_CommunityAlcoholStrategy20160412.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenno JG. Prince Albert youth drug and alcohol use: a comparison study of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, and Canada youth. J Community Saf Well-Being. 2016;1(3):61–5. https://doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maina G, Crizzle A, Maposa S, Fournier B. Sociodemographic profiles and clinical outcomes for clients on methadone maintenance treatment in a western canadian clinic: implications for practice. J Forensic Nurs. 2019;15(4):231–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McConnell MM, Memetovic J, Richardson CG. Coping style and substance use intention and behavior patterns in a cohort of BC adolescents. Addict Behav. 2014;39(10):1394–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.05.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grebe AM. Healing our heroes: creating an arts-based intervention. In: Bopp J, Grebe AM, Denny JH, editors. Healing through the arts for non-clinical practitioners. Medical Information Science Reference/IGI Global; 2019. p. 22–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5981-8.ch003.

  10. Ettun R, Schultz M, Bar-Sela G. Transforming pain into beauty: on art, healing, and care for the spirit. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/789852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ball S, Leach B, Bousfield J, Smith P, Marjanovic S. Arts-based approaches to public engagement with research: Lessons from a rapid review. RAND Corporation. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA194-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Havsteen-Franklin D, Tjasink M, Kottler JW, Grant C, Kumari V. Arts-Based interventions for professionals in caring roles during and after Crisis: a systematic review of the literature. Front Psychol. 2020;11:589744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.589744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stuckey HL, Nobel J. The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):254–63. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2008.156497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delgado M. Urban youth and photovoice: visual ethnography in action. USA: Oxford University Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tam H-l, Shik AW-y, Lam SS-l. Using expressive arts in relapse prevention of young psychotropic substance abusers in Hong Kong. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;60:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aletraris L, Paino M, Edmond MB, Roman PM, Bride BE. The use of art and music therapy in substance abuse treatment programs. J Addict Nurs. 2014;25(4):190–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/jan.0000000000000048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sitzer DL, Stockwell AB. The art of wellness: a 14-week art therapy program for at-risk youth. Arts Psychother. 2015;45:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2015.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chevalier-Amy N. “Becoming: how expressive arts nurture Self-Esteem, identity and empowerment, development of a Method” (2020). Expressive Therapies Capstone Theses. 355. https://digitalcommons.lesley.edu/expressive_theses/355.

  19. Khalil H, McInerney P, Pollock D, Alexander L, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Peters MD.  Practical guide to undertaking scoping reviews for pharmacy clinicians, researchers and policymakers. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;47(2).

  20. Pham MT, Rajic A, Greig JD, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2014;5(4):371–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D,. . Straus SE. PRISMA Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/m18-0850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Canada’s Drug and Health Technology Agency. Grey matters: a practical tool for searching health-related grey literature. 2022. https://www.cadth.ca/grey-matters-practical-tool-searching-health-related-grey-literature.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1–10.

  25. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonyani A, Safaeian L, Chehrazi M, Etedali A, Zaghian M, Mashhadian F. A high school-based education concerning drug abuse prevention. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7(1):88. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_122_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Beauchamp N, Wells J, Ary DV. Development and evaluation of an interactive CD-ROM refusal skills program to prevent youth substance use: “Refuse to use”. J Behav Med. 2000;23(1):59–72. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005420304147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stanley LR, Kelly KJ, Swaim RC, Jackman D. Cultural Adaptation of the be under your own influence media campaign for Middle-School American Indian Youth. J Health Commun. 2018;23(12):1017–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1536730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Quek LH, White A, Low C, Brown J, Dalton N, Dow D, Connor JP. Good choices, great future: an applied theatre prevention program to reduce alcohol-related risky behaviours during Schoolies. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2012;31(7):897–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2012.00453.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Duncan LR, Hieftje KD, Pendergrass TM, Sawyer BG, Fiellin LE. Preliminary investigation of a videogame prototype for cigarette and marijuana prevention in adolescents. Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):275–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2018.1437862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin Y, Miller-Day M, Hecht ML, Krieger JL. Entertainment-education videos as a Persuasive Tool in the Substance Use Prevention intervention “keepin’ it REAL”. Health Commun. 2018;33(7):896–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1321163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Turner-Musa JO, Rhodes WA, Harper PT, Quinton SL. Hip-hop to prevent substance use and HIV among african-american youth: a preliminary investigation. J Drug Educ. 2008;38(4):351–65. https://doi.org/10.2190/DE.38.4.c.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hecht ML, Corman SR, Miller-Rassulo M. An evaluation of the Drug Resistance Project: a comparison of Film Versus Live Performance Media. Health Commun. 1993;5(2):75–88. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc0502_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Polansky JM. Common and specific effects of substance-abuse-prevention videotapes on Mexican-American adolescents Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global; 1994. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304122405?pqorigsite=gscholar&fromopenview=tru#.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Duryea EJ. Utilizing tenets of inoculation theory to develop and evaluate a preventive alcohol education intervention. J Sch Health. 1983;53(4):250–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1983.tb01139.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang S-F, Zheng W-L, Liao J-Y, Huang C-M, Lin T-Y, Guo J-L. The effectiveness of a theory-based drama intervention in preventing illegal drug use among students aged 14–15 years in Taiwan. Health Educ J. 2018;77(4):470–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896918768647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. van Leeuwen L, Renes RJ, Leeuwis C. Televised entertainment-education to prevent adolescent alcohol use: perceived realism, enjoyment, and impact. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(2):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198112445906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. de Visser RO, Graber R, Hart A, Abraham C, Scanlon T, Watten P, Memon A. Using qualitative methods within a mixed-methods approach to developing and evaluating interventions to address harmful alcohol use among young people. Health Psychol. 2015;34(4):349–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harding CG, Safer LA, Kavanagh J, Bania R, Carty H, Lisnov L, Wysockey K. Using live theatre combined with role playing and discussion to examine what at-risk adolescents think about substance abuse, its consequences, and prevention. Adolescence. 1996;31(124):783–96. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8970653.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Warren JR, Hecht ML, Wagstaff DA, Elek E, Ndiaye K, Dustman P, Marsiglia FF. Communicating prevention: the effects of the keepin’ it REAL classroom videotapes and televised PSAs on middle-school students’ substance use. J Appl Commun Res. 2006;34(2):209–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880600574153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams C, Griffin KW, Macaulay AP, West TL, Gronewold E. Efficacy of a drug prevention CD-ROM intervention for adolescents. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(6):869–78. https://doi.org/10.1081/ja-200042219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hardoff D, Stoffman N, Ziv A. Empowering adolescents to control alcohol-associated risky situations. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(9):672–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Safer LA, Harding CG. Under pressure program: using live theatre to investigate adolescents’ attitudes and behavior related to drug and alcohol abuse education and prevention. Adolescence. 1993;28(109):135–48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8456602.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan Y, Zhang S, Li Y, Li Y, Zhang T, Liu W, Jiang H. Development and psychometric testing of the knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) questionnaire among student tuberculosis (TB) patients (STBP-KAPQ) in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW. School-based programmes to prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug use. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007;19(6):607–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701797753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim S, Crutchfield C, Williams C, Hepler N. Toward a new paradigm in substance abuse and other Problem Behavior Prevention for Youth: Youth development and empowerment Approach. J Drug Educ. 1998;28(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.2190/5ET9-X1C2-Q17B-2G6D.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Crooks CV, Chiodo D, Thomas D, Hughes R. Strengths-based programming for First Nations youth in schools: building engagement through healthy relationships and leadership skills. Int J Mental Health Addict. 2010;8(2):160–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9242-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Coholic D, Schinke R, Oghene O, Dano K, Jago M, McAlister H, Grynspan P. Arts-based interventions for youth with mental health challenges. J Social Work. 2019;20(3):269–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319828864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Laser JA, Nicotera N. Working with adolescents: a guide for practitioners. New York: Guilford Publications; 2021.

  50. Hall WD. Cannabis use and the mental health of young people. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006;40(2):105–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/j.1440-1614.2006.01756.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); Office of the Surgeon General (US). Facing addiction in America: the Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, drugs, and Health. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28252892.

  52. Stewart M, Reid G, Mangham C. Fostering children’s resilience. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997;12(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0882-5963(97)80018-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Dryfoos J. Thirty years in pursuit of the magic bullet. J Adolesc Health. 1998;23(6):338–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(98)00087-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. van Styvendale N, McDougall J, Henry R, Innes RA. The arts of indigenous health and well-being. Winnipeg: Univ. of Manitoba Press; 2021.

  55. Resnicow K, Soler R, Braithwaite RL, Ahluwalia JS, Butler J. Cultural sensitivity in substance use prevention. J Community Psychol. 2000;28(3):271–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200005)28:3<271::AID-JCOP4>3.0.CO;2-I.

  56. Watson WR, Mong CJ, Harris CA. A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Comput Educ. 2011;56(2):466–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bourgonjon J, Valcke M, Soetaert R, Schellens T. Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Comput Educ. 2010;54:1145–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Brown KE, Abraham C, Joshi P, Wallace LM. Sexual health professionals’ evaluations of a prototype computer-based contraceptive planning intervention for adolescents: implications for practice. Sex Health. 2012;9(4):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1071/sh11042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Green MC, Strange JJ, Brock TC. Narrative impact: social and cognitive foundations. London: Psychology Press; 2003.

  60. Benson PL, Scales PC, Hamilton SF, Sesma A Jr. Positive Youth Development: theory, Research, and applications. In: Lerner RM, Damon W, editors. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006. p. 894–941.

  61. Ribisl KM. The potential of the internet as a medium to encourage and discourage youth tobacco use. Tob Control. 2003;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i48-59. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.12.suppl_1.i48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Wood LJ, Rosenberg M, Clarkson J, Phillips F, Donovan RJ, Shilton T. Encouraging young western Australians to be smarter than smoking. Am J Health Promot. 2009;23(6):403–11. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.061105141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Birkeland S, Murphy-Graham E, Weiss C. Good reasons for ignoring good evaluation: the case of the drug abuse resistance education (D.A.R.E.) program. Eval Program Plan. 2005;28(3):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ennett ST, Tobler NS, Ringwalt CL, Flewelling RL. How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of Project DARE outcome evaluations. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(9):1394–401. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.9.1394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This scoping review is funded by the Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GM (1st author) conceptualized the study, applied for funding, wrote the results section, and contributed to the discussion section. YL performed a literature search and screening of articles and wrote the methods section; YF wrote the introduction section, DN screened the articles, and contributed to the discussion section. JA, MP, TH, JS and GM (9th author) provided in-depth feedback on the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey Maina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix 1.

Searching Strategies of the Database ERIC. Appendix 2. Searching Strategies of the Database Ovid MEDLINE. Appendix 3. Searching Strategies of the Database CINAHL (EBSCO). Appendix 4. Searching Strategies of the Database EMBASE. Appendix 5. Searching Strategies of the Database Web of Science. Appendix 6. Searching Strategies of the Database APA PsycInfo. Appendix 7. Searching Strategies of Grey Literature. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maina, G., Li, Y., Fang, Y. et al. Exploring arts-based interventions for youth substance use prevention: a scoping review of literature. BMC Public Health 22, 2281 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14714-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14714-4

Keywords