Fu X, Zhang K. Report on National Mental Health Development in China (2017–2018). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press(China); 2018.
Google Scholar
Guo J, Guan L, Fang L, Liu C, Fu M, He H, Wang X. Depression among Chinese older adults: A perspective from Hukou and health inequities. J Affect Disord. 2017;223:115–20.
Article
Google Scholar
Zhang L, Li Z. A Mokken scale analysis of the Kessler-6 screening measure among Chinese older population: findings from a national survey. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):361.
Article
Google Scholar
Mewton L, Kessler RC, Slade T, Hobbs MJ, Brownhill L, Birrell L, Tonks Z, Teesson M, Newton N, Chapman C, et al. The psychometric properties of the Kessler psychological distress scale (K6) in a general population sample of adolescents. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(10):1232–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, et al. Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(Suppl 1):4–22.
Article
Google Scholar
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SLT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med. 2002;32(6):959–76.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Vissoci JRN, Vaca SD, El-Gabri D, de Oliveira LP, Mvungi M, Mmbaga BT, Haglund M, Staton C. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Kessler Scale of Psychological Distress to a traumatic brain injury population in Swahili and the Tanzanian Setting. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):147.
Article
Google Scholar
Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, Andrews G. The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):357–62.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Drapeau A, Beaulieu-Prévost D, Marchand A, Boyer R, Préville M, Kairouz S. A life-course and time perspective on the construct validity of psychological distress in women and men. Measurement invariance of the K6 across gender. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10(1):68.
Article
Google Scholar
Andersen LS, Grimsrud A, Myer L, Williams DR, Stein DJ, Seedat S. The psychometric properties of the K10 and K6 scales in screening for mood and anxiety disorders in the South African Stress and Health study. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011;20(4):215–23.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Xie Y, Hu J. An Introduction to the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Chin Sociol Rev. 2014;47(1):3–29.
Khan A, Chien CW, Burton NW. A new look at the construct validity of the K6 using Rasch analysis. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2014;23(1):1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC. Improving the K6 short scale to predict serious emotional disturbance in adolescents in the USA. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2010;19(Suppl 1):23–35.
Article
Google Scholar
Prochaska JJ, Sung HY, Max W, Shi Y, Ong M. Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012;21(2):88–97.
Article
Google Scholar
Kang YK, Guo WJ, Xu H, Chen YH, Li XJ, Tan ZP, Li N, Gesang ZR, Wang YM, Liu CB, et al. The 6-item Kessler psychological distress scale to survey serious mental illness among Chinese undergraduates: Psychometric properties and prevalence estimate. Compr Psychiatry. 2015;63:105–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Dadfar M, Vahid M, Lester D, Bahrami F. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6): Psychometric testing of the Farsi form in psychiatric outpatients. Advances in Bioresearch. 2016;7:105–8.
Google Scholar
Peiper N, Clayton R, Wilson R, Illback R. The performance of the K6 Scale in a large school sample. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(1):228–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Kim G, DeCoster J, Bryant AN, Ford KL. Measurement Equivalence of the K6 Scale: The Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Language. Assessment. 2016;23(6):758–68.
Article
Google Scholar
Peiper N, Lee A, Lindsay S, Drashner N, Wing J. The performance of the K6 scale in a large school sample: A follow-up study evaluating measurement invariance on the Idaho Youth Prevention Survey. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(6):775–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee S, Tsang A, Ng KL, Ma YL, Guo W, Mak A, Kwok K. Performance of the 6-item Kessler scale for measuring serious mental illness in Hong Kong. Compr Psychiatry. 2012;53(5):584–92.
Article
Google Scholar
Bessaha ML. Factor Structure of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) Among Emerging Adults. Res Soc Work Pract. 2015;27(5):616–24.
Article
Google Scholar
Easton SD, Safadi NS, Wang Y, Hasson RG. The Kessler psychological distress scale: translation and validation of an Arabic version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):215.
Article
Google Scholar
Horn JL, McArdle JJ. A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Exp Aging Res. 1992;18(3):117–44.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Ferro MA. The Psychometric Properties of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in an Epidemiological Sample of Canadian Youth. Can J Psychiatry. 2019;64(9):647–57.
Article
Google Scholar
Cotton SM, Menssink J, Filia K, Rickwood D, Hickie IB, Hamilton M, Hetrick S, Parker A, Herrman H, McGorry PD, et al. The psychometric characteristics of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6) in help-seeking youth: What do you miss when using it as an outcome measure? Psychiatry Res. 2021;305: 114182.
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sunderland M, Hobbs MJ, Anderson TM, Andrews G. Psychological distress across the lifespan: examining age-related item bias in the Kessler 6 Psychological Distress Scale. Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(2):231–42.
Article
Google Scholar
Fokkema M, Smits N, Kelderman H, Cuijpers P. Response shifts in mental health interventions: an illustration of longitudinal measurement invariance. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(2):520–31.
Article
Google Scholar
Sone T, Nakaya N, Sugawara Y, Tomata Y, Watanabe T, Tsuji I. Longitudinal association between time-varying social isolation and psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake. Soc Sci Med. 2016;152:96–101.
Article
Google Scholar
Xie Y, Hu J, Zhang C. The China Family Panel Studies: Design and practice. Chin J Sociol. 2014;34(2):1–32.
Google Scholar
Muthén B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1985;38(2):171–89.
Article
Google Scholar
McDonald RP. Ho M-HR: Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):64–82.
Article
Google Scholar
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2001.
Google Scholar
Little TD, Preacher KJ, Selig JP, Card NA. New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. Int J Behav Dev. 2007; 31(4):357–65.
Edossa AK, Schroeders U, Weinert S, Artelt C. The development of emotional and behavioral self-regulation and their effects on academic achievement in childhood. Int J Behav Dev. 2018;42(2):192–202.
Article
Google Scholar
Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes. 2002;4:1–22
Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9(2):233–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Chen FF. Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(3):464–504.
Article
Google Scholar
Dimitrov DM. Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Meas Eval Couns Dev. 2010;43(2):121–49.
Article
Google Scholar
Millsap RE, Cham H. Investigating factorial invariance in longitudinal data. In: Laursen B, Little TD, Card NA, editors. Handbook of Developmental Research Methods. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. p. 109–26.