Skip to main content

Substance use is associated with condomless anal intercourse among men who have sex with men in India: a partner-level analysis



Men who have sex with men (MSM) bear a disproportionately high burden of new HIV infections while lagging behind other populations with respect to engagement across the HIV care continuum. General risk factors for condomless anal intercourse (CAI) among MSM are well studied but there is a paucity of partner-level data, where emerging evidence suggests that much of the variation in condom use occurs.


MSM were recruited across 10 cities in India using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) from 2016–17. Among the individuals who reported sexual intercourse in the prior 6 months, condom use and partner characteristics of the last 4 partners were captured. Correlates of CAI at the individual and partner level were determined using Poisson regression models using generalized estimating equations and incorporating RDS-II weights, which weights estimates for the participant’s network size.


Among the 8,086 individuals, 21,723 sexual partnerships were analyzed. The prevalence of CAI was 46.9% and most partners were casual or one-time (70.7%) with partner HIV status reported as unknown in 42.6% of the sexual encounters. In multivariable analyses, partner-level characteristics associated with higher likelihood of CAI included unknown partner HIV status (aPR vs. known HIV negative partner: 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27–1.43) and use of alcohol/ drugs prior to intercourse either sometimes (aPR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.33–1.51) or always (aPR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.23–1.41). At an individual level, any HIV treatment literacy was associated with a lower likelihood of CAI (aPR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74–0.86).


To reduce HIV transmission among this population of MSM across India, combination interventions are likely needed. Interventions targeting substance use and education as well as initiatives to increase self-testing are urgently needed among MSM in India and have the potential to reduce HIV transmission in this high-risk population.

Trial registration Identifier: NCT01686750. Date of Registration: September 18, 2012.

Peer Review reports


It is already well documented that men who have sex with men (MSM) lag behind other populations with respect to the HIV care continuum despite bearing a disproportionally high burden of HIV [1,2,3]. In India, this is compounded by the fact that MSM have a 20-fold higher prevalence of HIV than the general population [4]. MSM in India also have a high burden of alcohol use disorder and substance use, which have been shown to be associated with high risk sexual behavior, including condomless anal intercourse (CAI) [5,6,7]. Providing accessible and acceptable prevention options aimed at reducing risky sexual behavior remain critical strategies for reducing HIV transmission in this population. The importance of interventions that integrate HIV care with substance use and mental health services has been suggested by prior work, including from our group [5, 8].

In this study, we focused on partner-level risk factors because emerging evidence suggests much of the variation in condom use occurs at a partner-level [9]. Only a few studies have looked at partner-level risk factors among MSM in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) and none have been conducted in India, to our knowledge. Inconsistent condom use during anal intercourse among MSM in India is well documented in the literature but studies on risk factors for condomless anal intercourse (CAI) at a partner-level are not known [1, 2, 10, 11].

Studies looking at partner-level risk factors in other settings have shown that alcohol use prior to intercourse is a risk factor for CAI [12,13,14]. We seek to identify specific partner-level risk factors as these provide an opportunity to devise interventions to reduce HIV transmission risk [12, 13].

In this sample of 10,024 MSM from 10 Indian cities, we examined individual- and partner-level characteristics associated with CAI.


Study design

Data for these analyses were collected as part of the evaluation assessment of a cluster randomized trial among MSM and people who inject drugs (PWID) in India ( Identifier: NCT01686750) [15]. The trial was designed to examine the role of an integrated HIV prevention and treatment service delivery model on the uptake of HIV testing across 10 Indian cities. Briefly, 10,024 MSM were recruited in 2016 and 2017 as part of the cross-sectional evaluation assessment of the MSM stratum of this trial using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) that was initiated with 2 “seeds” (individuals identified in the qualitative phase as well-connected in the MSM communities) in each city [15]. The target sample size for each city was 1,000 participants [16].

Study population

Eligibility criteria included: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) self-identify as male; (3) report oral or anal sex with another man in the prior 12 months; (4) provide informed consent; and (5) possess a valid RDS referral coupon (except for “seeds”). Participants who self-identified as female or transgender (hijra) were excluded. Of the 10,024 MSM who were recruited, 8,086 reported anal intercourse in the prior 6 months with at least 1 partner and were included in these analyses. Partner characteristics were available for up to the 4 most recent partners per individual. This is outlined in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow chart of men who have sex with men (MSM) who reported anal intercourse in past 6 months

Study procedures

Detailed study procedures have been previously published [3]. After providing verbal consent, participants completed an interviewer-administered electronic survey and provided a blood sample. Rapid HIV testing was performed on-site with appropriate counseling as per Indian Guidelines [17, 18]. Each participant who completed the study was given two coupons to distribute randomly to two other members of his/her peer network (i.e., other MSM in their community whom they knew). Participants were reimbursed Indian Rupees (INR) 250 (USD 4) for completing the study visit which usually lasted about one to two hours. Further, participants could earn an incentive of INR 50 (~ USD 0.80) per eligible participant referred who completed study procedures. All samples were shipped to YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education in Chennai for additional testing.

The electronic survey captured information on socio-demographics, HIV-related risk factors, alcohol use, and substance use. Participants were asked their sexual identities, which are diverse among MSM in India and include kothis, who display feminine demeanor and prefer receptive anal intercourse only, panthis, who display a masculine demeanor and prefer penetrative anal intercourse only, and double deckers, who engage in both receptive and penetrative intercourse. HIV treatment literacy was defined based on several questions about knowledge of HIV treatment. History of sex work was defined by a person reporting their profession to be ‘sex worker’ or said they ever had sex in exchange for money/alcohol/drugs/gifts. Having STI symptoms in prior 6 months was defined based on self-report of unusual anal and/or genital discharge or having pain/ sore in the anal and/or genital region in the preceding 6 months. Anyone who reported unwanted childhood sexual experiences was defined as having experienced childhood sexual abuse. Forced sex was characterized as any encounter where the participant self-reported being forced to have sex when they did not want to. Alcohol use was assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Recreational drug use (non-injection and injection) was self-reported using standard measures previously used in India [19, 20]. All participants who reported sex in the prior 6 months were queried in detail up to their four most recent sexual encounters. For each of the four most recent encounters, they were asked questions about the use of alcohol/ recreational drug, gender identity of the participant, type of partner (main vs. casual), frequency of intercourse, type of anal intercourse (receptive vs. insertive) HIV status of the partner and whether they used condoms during the encounter.

All participants underwent on-site rapid HIV testing. HIV RNA was quantified using the RealTime HIV-1 assay (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA) with a lower limit of detection of 150 copies/ml and HSV-2 status was ascertained an Anti-HSV-2 (gG2) ELISA (IgG) test (Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika, AG Lubeck, Germany).

Statistical analyses

Analyses were restricted to individuals who reported anal intercourse in the prior 6 months. Data from RDS “seeds” were excluded in all analyses. The prevalence of CAI (defined as using condoms ‘never’ or ‘sometimes’ when having insertive or receptive anal sex with partner in prior 6 months) was estimated using the RDS-II (Volz-Heckathorn estimator), which weights estimates for network size (i.e., number of MSM in the city whom the participant saw in the prior 30 days). Population summary statistics were estimated with a composite weight, which accounts for the relative population size of adult men 15–59 years of age in each city (assuming a similar proportion of MSM across cities), in addition to the RDS-II weight [21, 22]. Individual and partner level correlates of CAI were explored using Poisson regression models using generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for multiple partners per individual with associations presented as prevalence ratios (PRs) [23].

Participant and partner characteristics that were associated with a p-value < 0.10 were included in the final multivariable model. The participant level characteristics included in the final model were age, marital status, education, sexual identity, monthly income, HIV treatment literacy, history of sex work, substance use in prior 6 months (excluding marijuana), STI symptoms in prior 6 months, HSV-2 status, and HIV status. The partner level characteristics that were included in the final model were partner sexual identity, relationship to partner, partner’s HIV status, use of alcohol/ drugs prior to intercourse and frequency of intercourse.

All statistical analyses were performed using Stata version 15.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).


Participant characteristics

Table 1 presents characteristics of study participants and the self-reported characteristics of their last four sexual partners. The median age of participants was 28 years (Interquartile range (IQR): 23–36). About half (47.6%) were never married and 46.9% were currently married or living with a partner of any gender. Over a third self-identified as panthi (38.2%) and 22% as kothi. Secondary schooling and high school education or more were reported by 42.9% and 40.5%, respectively. Most participants (67.4%) reported an average monthly income > 115 USD.

Table 1 Weighted characteristicsa by condomless anal intercourse (CAI) among 8,086 men who have sex with men (MSM) and 21,723 MSM sexual encounters in 10 Indian cities

Partner characteristics

8,086 individuals included in the analysis: 3,424 (42.3%) listed 4 partners, 4,214 (52.1%) listed at least 3 partners, and 5,999 (74.2%) listed at least 2 partners. A total of 21,723 sexual partnerships were included. Over a third of partners were panthi (37.8%) followed by kothi (32%). Most were casual or one-time partners (70.7%), while 20.6% were boyfriends. Participants reported that the HIV status of their partner was negative in 56.1% of partnerships and unknown in 42.6% of partnerships. Drugs/alcohol were used in about 40% of sexual acts with these partners (with similar prevalence regardless of partner HIV status). Frequency of intercourse was less than weekly in most partners (78.8%).

Prevalence and correlates of CAI

Of the 21,723 sexual partners reported by the 8,086 participants, CAI was reported in 11,777 (46.9%) of the partnerships. In univariable analyses (Table 2), individual-level characteristics associated with increased likelihood of CAI included history of sex work (PR 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–1.27), having STI symptoms in prior 6 months (PR 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03–1.29), reporting substance use in prior 6 months (PR 1.27; 95% CI: 1.18–1.37), higher median AUDIT score (PR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.22–1.29); partner characteristics associated with higher likelihood of CAI were sexual identity as a double decker (PR 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01–1.15) or hijra (PR 1.5; 95% CI 1.39–1.63), sex work (PR 1.21; 95% CI 1.11–1.32), unknown HIV status (PR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.34–1.5), and use of alcohol/ drugs prior to intercourse (PR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.4–1.61).

Table 2 Correlates of CAIa among 21,732 MSM sexual encounters in 10 Indian cities

In multivariable analyses, individual-level characteristics associated with increased likelihood of CAI included being a history of sex work (aPR 1.13; 95% CI: 1.06–1.20) or reporting STI symptoms in prior 6 months (aPR 1.17; 95% CI: 1.04–1.31); characteristics associated with lower likelihood of CAI were being currently married/ living with a partner (aPR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76–0.88), at least a high school education (aPR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74–0.89), kothi (aPR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78–0.99), HIV treatment literacy (aPR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74–0.86) and being HIV positive with an undetectable viral load (aPR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61–0.91). (Among those who were married/ living with a partner, those living with male or female partners but not married had lower likelihood of CAI compared to those who were married.)

At the partner-level, in multivariable analysis, CAI was significantly more common if the partner was a hijra (aPR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.28–1.52), had unknown HIV status (aPR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.27–1.43) or drugs/alcohol were used sometimes (aPR 1.42; 95% CI: 1.33–1.51) or always (aPR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.23–1.41) prior to the sexual encounter.


In this large community-based sample of MSM, the prevalence of CAI was nearly half, an alarmingly high number. We present predictors of high-risk sexual behaviors at the partnership level, an area where there has been substantially less investigation compared with traditional overall risk factors for CAI [24, 25]. The importance of such factors comes from increasing evidence that much of variation in condom use occurs at the event-level rather than at the individual level [9, 14, 25]. This study represents one of the largest partner-level risk factor analysis of MSM in the literature and one of the few from a LMIC [11, 12].

We found that the use of alcohol/drugs prior to intercourse increases the likelihood of CAI. Published literature on the relationship between alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among heterosexuals at an event-level has thus far been equivocal, but a positive relationship between the two has been observed among MSM in both high-income settings and LMICs, which we confirm [12, 13, 25,26,27]. In India, the prevalence of alcohol use in the adult male population is inadequately characterized- available data suggest that high proportions of alcohol users in India meet criteria for hazardous use [28, 29]. The easy availability of substances in settings where MSM engage in sex and their role in enhancing the sexual experience contribute to the high rate of alcohol/ drug use, both of which are known risk factors for increased HIV transmission [30, 31]. There are currently millions of opiate and sedative users in India- this problem is likely to worsen in the coming years with the influx of party drugs, such as ecstasy, into the Indian market [32]. Interventions targeting these high levels of substance use including alcohol are needed among MSM in such settings as they have the potential to reduce transmission as demonstrated in these data and improve viral suppression as previously demonstrated [8]. The interventions must be designed with awareness about the current legal environment around these substances.

Unknown partner HIV status (which was the case in 42.6% of sexual encounters in our analysis) was another strong predictor of CAI, relative to HIV-negative partner status. Data from other settings suggests that individuals do not disclose their status to partners due to stigma and rejection, so it is unsurprising that HIV status disclosure to partners is limited [33]. We are also unaware of any data from India about serosorting, whereby an individual engages in CAI with partners who HIV status they are aware of, but not other partners. It is unclear whether this reflects that the communication isn’t happening or that the partner does not actually know his HIV status, but prior studies have estimated that approximately 70% of HIV positive MSM in India are unaware of their status [18]. In fact, the high levels of unknown HIV status among partners (42.6% in our study) suggests that this proportion may even be higher. Tackling these complex challenges in this hidden population in India may require alternative testing approaches such as self-testing and simple education on assessing partner risk. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is another strategy that may help reduce HIV transmission in this population.

The finding of a lower likelihood of CAI among those living with partners but not married compared to those who were married may reflect stable same-sex relationships and requires further work. Future work is needed to develop a conceptual framework of partner-level HIV risks among MSM, similar to those developed for other sexual behaviors [34].

HIV treatment literacy was associated with a lower likelihood of CAI but seen in fewer than a third of individuals in this sample. Tackling this education gap can include strategies to ask about partner status and condom use negotiation strategies. Condom negotiation represents an important skill in reducing risk, but the efficacy of condom use has been shown to be diminished with alcohol use [35]. Nevertheless, it remains an important strategy and one that ought to be prioritized in programmatic interventions aimed at HIV risk reduction.

Strengths and limitations

All data including and partner characteristics were self-reported and subject to recall and social desirability biases. We used trained interviewers who were not from the local community and used validated questionnaires to mitigate these biases. The amount of alcohol use prior to a sexual encounter is not measured and may be important as some studies show a worse outcomes with heavier alcohol use, which we were unable to test but can be explored in future work [26, 36]. The use of alcohol versus drug use prior to intercourse is not measured in the partner and may represent different risks. More nuanced data on drug use, including intended effect of drug use, may provide further insights and understanding into risk behavior. With regards to CAI among those with partners, the breakup of partner by gender is not available, precluding further conclusions from being drawn. Other major strengths of this analysis are the large sample size and a geographically diverse group of participants. We have data on up to four partners per participant, which enabled us to include over 20,000 sexual encounters in the analysis, making this one of the largest partner level analyses of MSM. We used a sampling method (RDS) designed to produce unbiased estimates in the target population. This analysis did not look specifically at condomless receptive intercourse and condomless penetrative intercourse, which we aim to do in future work.


In this large diverse sample of MSM from India, we demonstrated that unknown HIV status of one’s partner and consumption of drugs/alcohol prior to sexual intercourse were associated with a higher likelihood of CAI. Strategies to improve HIV testing including approaches such as HIV self-testing and interventions to address substance use including alcohol could play an important role in curbing spread of HIV among MSM in India. This study represents one of the largest partner-level analysis of risk factors among MSM in the world and the first from India.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the NCA Study Executive Committee, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the NCA Study Executive Committee. The request should include specific aims, hypotheses to be addressed, specific variables that are directly relevant to the proposed analysis, and an explanatory statement on how requested data sets will answer the proposed question(s). Requests should be sent to NCA Study Executive Committee, Department of Epidemiology 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland, 21,205.



Men who have sex with men


Condomless anal intercourse


Respondent-driven sampling


Low and middle-income countries


People who inject drugs


Indian rupees


Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test


Generalized estimating equations


Prevalence ratio


Interquartile range


Confidence interval


  1. Teclessou JN, Akakpo SA, Ekouevi KD, Koumagnanou G, Singo-Tokofai A, Pitche PV. Evolution of HIV prevalence and behavioral factors among MSM in Togo between 2011 and 2015. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;28:191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raifman J, Beyrer C, Arrington-Sanders R. HIV Education and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Young Men Who Have Sex with Men. LGBT Health. 2018;5:131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Solomon SS, Mehta SH, Srikrishnan AK, et al. High HIV prevalence and incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) across 12 cities in India. AIDS. 2015;29:723–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. National AIDS Control Organisation. Annual Report 2011-12 [Internet]. New Delhi (IN): Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2012. [cited 5 Feb 2022]. 104 p. Available from

  5. Wilkerson JM, Di Paola A, Rawat S, Patankar P, Rosser BRS, Ekstrand ML. Substance Use, Mental Health, HIV Testing, and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in the State of Maharashtra. India AIDS Educ Prev. 2018;30:96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhambhani Y, Rawat S, Norton BL, Patel VV. Alcohol and Drug Use Surrounding Sex Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in India. Sex Cult. 2021;25:1383–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yadav D, Chakrapani V, Goswami P, et al. Association between alcohol use and HIV-related sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men (MSM): findings from a multi-site bio-behavioral survey in India. AIDS Behav. 2014;18:1330–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prabhu S, McFall AM, Mehta SH, et al. Psychosocial Barriers to Viral Suppression in a Community-based Sample of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Men Who Have Sex With Men and People Who Inject Drugs in India. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70:304–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith AMA, Grierson J, Pitts M, Pattison P. Individual characteristics are less important than event characteristics in predicting protected and unprotected anal intercourse among homosexual and bisexual men in Melbourne. Australia Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82:474–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vu L, Andrinopoulos K, Tun W, Adebajo S. High levels of unprotected anal intercourse and never testing for HIV among men who have sex with men in Nigeria: evidence from a cross-sectional survey for the need for innovative approaches to HIV prevention. Sex Transm Infect. 2013;89:659–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larmarange J, Wade AS, Diop AK, et al. Men who have sex with men (MSM) and factors associated with not using a condom at last sexual intercourse with a man and with a woman in Senegal. PLoS One. 2010;5:e13189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Delgado JR, Segura ER, Lake JE, Sanchez J, Lama JR, Clark JL. Event-level analysis of alcohol consumption and condom use in partnership contexts among men who have sex with men and transgender women in Lima. Peru Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;170:17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Irwin TW, Morgenstern J, Parsons JT, Wainberg M, Labouvie E. Alcohol and sexual HIV risk behavior among problem drinking men who have sex with men: An event level analysis of timeline followback data. AIDS Behav. 2006;10:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mustanski B, Newcomb ME, Clerkin EM. Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men. Health Psychol. 2011;30:597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Solomon SS, Lucas GM, Celentano DD, et al. Design of the Indian NCA study (Indian national collaboration on AIDS): a cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of integrated care centers to improve HIV outcomes among men who have sex with men and persons who inject drugs in India. BMC Health ServRes. 2016;16:652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Solomon SS, Mehta SH, Srikrishnan AK, et al. High HIV prevalence and incidence among MSM across 12 cities in India. AIDS. 2015;29:723–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. National AIDS Control Organisation. National Technical Guidelines on Anti Retroviral Treatment [Internet]. New Delhi (IN): Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2018. [cited 12 Dec 2018]. 255 p. Available from

  18. Mehta SH, Lucas GM, Solomon S, et al. HIV Care Continuum Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Persons Who Inject Drugs in India: Barriers to Successful Engagement. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:1732.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Solomon SS, Srikrishnan AK, Mehta SH, et al. High prevalence of HIV, HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection, and risk behaviors among injection drug users in Chennai, India: a cause for concern. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49:327–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon SS, Celentano DD, Srikrishnan AK, et al. Low incidences of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection and declining risk behaviors in a cohort of injection drug users in Chennai. India Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:1259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Volz E, Heckathorn D. Probability Based Estimation Theory for Respondent Driven Sampling. J Official Statistics. 2008;24(1):79–97.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Institute of Medical Statistics and National AIDS Control Organization. Technical report: India HIV estimates [Internet]. New Delhi (IN): Ministry of Health & Family Welfare; 2010. [cited 1 May 2018]. 39 p. Available from

  23. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E. Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162:199–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hess KL, Chavez PR, Kanny D, DiNenno E, Lansky A, Paz-Bailey G. Binge drinking and risky sexual behavior among HIV-negative and unknown HIV status men who have sex with men, 20 US cities. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;147:46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vosburgh HW, Mansergh G, Sullivan PS, Purcell DW. A review of the literature on event-level substance use and sexual risk behavior among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2012;16:1394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahler CW, Wray TB, Pantalone DW, et al. Daily associations between alcohol use and unprotected anal sex among heavy drinking HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2015;19:422–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Colfax G, Vittinghoff E, Husnik MJ, et al. Substance use and sexual risk: a participant- and episode-level analysis among a cohort of men who have sex with men. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:1002–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rathod SD, Nadkarni A, Bhana A, Shidhaye R. Epidemiological features of alcohol use in rural India: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e009802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ghosh S, Samanta A, Mukherjee S. Patterns of alcohol consumption among male adults at a slum in Kolkata. India J Health Popul Nutr. 2012;30:73–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pakianathan M, Whittaker W, Lee MJ, et al. Chemsex and new HIV diagnosis in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics. HIV Med. 2018;19:485–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lama P. Party drugs such as Molly, Meow Meow more popular but ganja most seized in India. Hindustan Times [Internet]. 2017. [cited 1 May 2018]; India News: [about 3 p.]. Available from:

  32. National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre. Magnitude of Substance Use in India [Internet]. New Delhi (IN): Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment; 2019. [cited 15 Feb 2021]. 6 p. Available from

  33. Warner M, Gutmann A, Sasse A, Blandford A. Privacy Unraveling Around Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in the Online Geosocial Hookup App Grindr. In: The 21st ACM Conference on Computer- Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing [Internet]. Jersey City: Association for Computing Machinery; 2018. p. 1–22. [cited 2021 Jan 15]. Available from:

  34. Rönn M, White PJ, Hughes G, Ward H. Developing a conceptual framework of seroadaptive behaviors in HIV-diagnosed men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(Suppl 2):S586–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Semple SJ, Patterson TL, Grant I. The sexual negotiation behavior of HIV-positive gay and bisexual men. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:934–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Woolf SE, Maisto SA. Alcohol Use and Risk of HIV infection among Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:757–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the National AIDS Control Organization (NACO), India, all our partner non-governmental organizations throughout India, our study staff, and the study participants, without whom this research would not have been possible.


This study was supported by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health (R01MH089266, R01DA041034, K24DA035684), the Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research (P30AI094189), and the Elton John AIDS Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SP: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing, editing; SM: study design, conceptualization, writing, editing; AM: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing, editing; AS: study design, writing, editing; CV: writing, editing; GL: study design, conceptualization, writing, editing; DC: study design, conceptualization, writing, editing; SS: study design, conceptualization, formal analysis, writing, editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sandeep Prabhu or Sunil S. Solomon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the institutional review boards of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education (YRGCARE). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants. Oral/verbal informed consent was approved by Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and YRGCARE (local Indian institution) institutional review boards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prabhu, S., Mehta, S.H., McFall, A.M. et al. Substance use is associated with condomless anal intercourse among men who have sex with men in India: a partner-level analysis. BMC Public Health 22, 722 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • MSM
  • India
  • HIV
  • AIDS
  • Condomless anal intercourse