Skip to main content
Download PDF

Optimism and survival: health behaviors as a mediator—a ten-year follow-up study of Chinese elderly people

BMC Public Health volume 22, Article number: 670 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Optimism—the generalized expectation that good things will happen—is a promising health asset. Mounting evidence indicates that there are specific associations between optimism and survival rates. However, for public health purposes, it is critical to consider whether the relationship between optimism and survival holds for older adults as a whole and to explore the role of health behaviors as potential mediators.

Methods

Prospective data were obtained from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Optimism was measured in 2008, and survival was measured by survival time of the interviewees during the whole observation period from 2008 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate the association between optimism and survival among the elderly. The mediating effect analysis method was used to explore the potential mediating role of health behaviors on the association between optimism and survival.

Results

Compared to less optimistic older adults, optimistic individuals were associated with lower odds of mortality (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 − 0.99). Health behaviors are key elements that play a positive role in survival (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.94 − 0.96). Health behaviors played an intermediary role in the relationship between optimism and mortality, and the mediating effect was -0.005.

Conclusions

Optimism and health behaviors were broadly and robustly associated with a lower risk of mortality. Health behaviors mediate the relationship between optimism and mortality. Appropriate intervention should be carried out on optimism and health behaviors among elderly people to improve the likelihood of health in aging.

Peer Review reports

Background

Optimism is a psychological trait that can be defined as the general expectation that good things, rather than bad things, will occur in one’s future [1]. Optimistic individuals tend to expect that they will overcome difficulties and encounter favorable outcomes, and they usually enjoy healthier and longer lives than their less optimistic peers [2, 3]. Optimism is considered a core component of one’s psychological well-being that shapes one’s thoughts and feelings and influences one’s behavior patterns in older age. With the rapid pace of increase of the aging population, rising life expectancy represents the progress of medical sciences, but not all the increased years of life are being spent in optimal health, which has attracted people to explore the factors that influence healthy longevity. Recent studies show that psychological assets such as optimism are potential predictors of longer life, based on findings associating higher optimism with a reduced risk of chronic disease among elderly individuals and premature mortality [4,5,6].

Do optimists live longer than pessimists? Having a positive outlook or being optimistic may pose an independent health benefit to the elderly [7]. Many studies have consistently demonstrated that higher level of optimism is associated with lower mortality [8,9,10], lower rates of chronic conditions [11, 12], higher rates of recovery from illness [13, 14], and better evaluation of self-rated health and life satisfaction [15]. In contrast, many studies have reported that negative effects (e.g., depression and uselessness) among elderly individuals are linked with higher rates of functional impairment and disability [16, 17], higher risk of cardiovascular disease [2], and poorer functions of cognition [18]. Importantly, optimism is associated with health outcomes above and beyond its role in signaling the absence of poor psychological function [19] and independent of sociodemographic confounders, health conditions, and lifestyle [20]. Studies further suggest that optimistic elderly individuals tend to foster a variety of positive behaviors (e.g., less cigarette smoking, more exercise), which could significantly improve elderly individuals’ quality of life [21,22,23].

One pathway through which optimism might affect physical and mental well-being is by the maintenance of prudent health behaviors [10, 24, 25]. Associations between optimism and health behaviors in older people might be expected on both theoretical and empirical grounds. In addition to the potential direct effects of optimism on physiological processes, as well as its possible role buffering against the harmful consequences of stress, theorists posit that individual with greater optimism enjoy better health outcomes because they engage in healthier behaviors such as exercising, eating fruits and vegetables, and avoiding cigarette smoking [26, 27]. A recent study suggested that optimism is conducive to the formation of health behaviors, which play a key role in reducing the risk of chronic diseases such as hypertension and stroke [28, 29]. Many studies have illustrated that health behaviors are associated with a reduced risk of mortality [30, 31] and improved physical and psychological wellness [32, 33]. There may be confusion that regular health behaviors might be cultivated at an early age among elderly individuals, and the positive effect between higher level of optimism and higher longevity could be overstated. Studying the association between baseline optimism and health behaviors in old age could reduce this reverse causality.

Although some work has documented associations between optimism and mortality, chronic diseases and health behaviors, a few studies have examined optimism as a predictor of survival among elderly individuals [22, 34], and less attention has been given to whether health behaviors have direct and indirect connections with survival among Chinese individuals [30]. Previous studies compounded health status (e.g., self-rated health and cognitive function) when exploring the association between optimism and survival, and which might ignore the fact that optimism would be affected by health condition [24]. It is unclear whether the findings in developed countries are valid in developing countries, such as in China, where survival of older adults is more selective due to high mortality at younger ages, and research on associations between optimism, health behaviors and survival is rare. In addition, the existing literature on optimism based on a large sample is still rare [22, 35], which might limit the generalizability of the findings of such studies.

This study aimed to examine the association between optimism and survival among older adults in China and explore the potential mediating role of health behaviors. The major contributions of this study included mainly the following points. First, health behaviors were explored as a link between optimism and survival, which has been less analyzed in the previous literature. Using longitudinal data, we search for evidence to explore the mediating role of health behaviors, which can help determine whether a causal association is plausible and thereby whether optimism and health behaviors are viable targets for intervention. Second, the study was based on data from a large sample in China over a ten-year follow-up period. China is the largest developing country with a rapidly aging population, where the intervention measures for optimistic psychology and health behaviors are still not perfect. More general conclusions can be drawn from our study based on the large sample in China, which may also have implications for other countries experiencing population aging.

Methods

Data source and study sample

We used data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). The CLHLS has been collecting a comprehensive data set from elderly individuals since 1998. To date, seven follow-up waves of data were collected in 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2011, 2014 and 2018. The survey randomly selected half of the total number of counties and cities in 22 out of 31 provinces in mainland China, and the 22 provinces where CLHLS was conducted covered approximately 85% of the total population of China [36]. Extensive data were collected in the CLHLS using internationally standardized questionnaires adapted to the Chinese cultural and social context. The CLHLS collects extensive data on demographics, socioeconomic conditions, psychological traits, health practices, and health conditions, and all data are collected via face-to-face interviews during in-home visits [37]. All respondents were tracked in the later waves unless death or loss to follow-up occurred. The response rates are 88 to 90% in the waves of CLHLS. Additional details, such as the sampling design, sampling weight and assessment of data quality, could be found in previous studies [38, 39].

The data of this study were from the last four waves of datasets, including 2008, 2011, 2014 and 2018 waves. The total sample size of the four follow-up investigations was 16,954. Considering that there is insufficient information to confirm the age reported by extremely old people, this study excluded elderly individuals aged 105 and over [37, 40]. Moreover, participants who died in the following three months after the baseline interview were deleted, indicating that their death may be caused by other factors (e.g., accident, acute infectious disease), which cannot accurately measure the association between optimism and survival [41]. After excluding cases with missing information on key variables, 13,370 observations were retained in this study. By 2018, a total of 7100 elderly individuals died, 3935 elderly individuals were lost to follow-up, and 2335 elderly individuals were still alive. The flow diagram of study selection process is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart describing sample selection

Full size image

Measurements

Survival

The dependent variable in this study is the survival time of the interviewees during the whole observation period from 2008 to 2018. Information on death was obtained from the death questionnaire of CLHLS, and there were detailed death records. In the sample, the elderly who died were defined as sample of “event occurring”, lost follow-up or survived in 2018 were defined as sample of “truncation”. The death rate is 53.1% and the percentage of deletion is 46.9% in this study.

Optimism

Optimism was measured by Life Evaluation and Personality Scale (LEPS) of CLHLS. The LEPS was designed on the basis of the Life Orientation Test that is a classic scale to measure optimism [42]. The LEPS has been validated in the Chinese cultural context, showing acceptable internal consistency [43]. The 6 items, including “Do you always look on the bright side of things?” “Do you often feel fearful or anxious?” “Do you often feel lonely and isolated?” “Do you feel the older you get, the more useless you are, and have trouble doing anything?” “Dou you feel very happy with your life now?” and “Are you as happy as when you were younger?”. Respondents’ answers were provided on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = never to 5 = always). Some questions were asked about the opposite status, and we reverse-assigned the interview’s answer. Therefore, all items were summed to create a composite score that ranged from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher levels of optimism. According to the cut-off value of optimism from previous literature, optimism was defined in 2 categories: optimistic (score > 21) and less optimistic (score ≤ 21) [27, 42, 44, 45]. In this study, older adults who were less optimistic will be used as a referent sample.

Health behaviors

Health behaviors were measured by 5 items similar to those in other studies [21, 30, 46], including physical activity, social activity, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Physical activity included outdoor activities (Tai Ji, square dance, visiting friends, other outdoor activity) and garden work, which have 3 options: 1 = never, 2 = not every month but sometimes, 3 = almost every day. Social activity questions included “Do you now take part in social activities (organized) regularly?” Respondents’ answers were 1 = never, 2 = usually, and 3 = always. Smoking status and alcohol consumption were categorized as 1 = current, 2 = formerly and 3 = never. These 5 items were added to generate an overall health behaviors score ranging from 5 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater engagement in health promoting behaviors.

Covariates

Covariates included sociodemographic and family/social support, which were described in the previous literature [9, 21, 22]. Sociodemographic variables included age, gender (male vs. female), marital status (married vs. single/divorced/widowed), education level (no formal education (illiterate) vs. primary school, junior high school, senior high school, college or university graduate), residence (urban vs. rural), activities of daily living (ADL) and chronic diseases. ADL was the total score (ranging from 6 to 18) of six aspects of daily living abilities, including bathing, dressing, bathroom use, indoor transferring, continence and feeding. Depending on the independence of elderly individuals in completing each of the above actions, they were given a score of 1 = complete dependence on others, 2 = partial independence or 3 = complete independence, with a higher score indicating better daily living ability. Chronic diseases (range 0–30) were measured by the number of chronic diseases diagnosed by the doctor. The items consist of 30 different chronic diseases, such as hypertension and heart disease, with higher scores indicating a greater number of chronic diseases and worse health status. Family/social support variables included the elderly’s decision-making power in the family (1 = very low to 5 = very high), family economic status (1 = very poor to 5 = very rich), numbers of children (ranging from 0–13), co-residence with family members or not (1 = yes, 0 = no), medical insurance (1 = yes, 0 = no) and pension insurance (1 = yes, 0 = no).

Statistical analysis

We first reported descriptive statistics of the study sample. Internal consistency of optimism was verified with Cronbach’s alpha. Differences in covariates and health behaviors variables between participants who were optimistic and were less optimistic at baseline were tested by unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests for quantitative and categorical variables, respectively. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the association of optimism and the rest of study variables with mortality.

Second, Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of optimism with mortality [47]. There are two assumptions in Cox proportional hazard model: proportional hazard and log-linearity. In our study, the outcome was survival, which was measured by the survival time and mortality of the interviewees during the whole observation period from 2008 to 2018. For the deceased individuals, time to death was calculated as the number of years from the baseline interview to the year of death. Participants who were not deceased and lost to follow-up due to reasons other than death were right-censored, and their survival time was measured as the years between the baseline and final recorded study year or last observation. The results are presented as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the analyses. Cox proportional hazards are applied to the survival to adjust for baseline group differences and provide a hazard ratio to quantify the effect that any single factor contributes to the survival, which has become the most widely applied regression perspective in survival analysis [48]. Based on the findings from the first set of analyses, we then investigated the effect of the association between optimism, health behaviors and mortality.

Finally, we explored the mediating effect of health behaviors on the relationship between optimism and survival. Following the procedures proposed by Baron and Kenny, we adopted a three-step estimation for the mediator. The mediation effect analysis needs to meet the following conditions: (1) Optimism was significantly associated with mortality (Total effect; Path c, Fig. 2); (2) Optimism was significantly associated with health behaviors (Path a); (3) Controlling for optimism, health behaviors were significantly associated with mortality (Path b); (4) The relationship between optimism and mortality was reduced (Direct effect, Path c’) when controlling for health behaviors (Indirect effect, a × b) [49]. Recent studies found that the bootstrap confidence interval was among the most trustworthy tests when conducting a mediation analysis [50]. If the 95% bootstrap CIs does not contain 0, this particular indirect effect is considered statistically significant [51]. Statistical analyses were performed by using IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The mediation model proposed

Full size image

Results

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.77 for optimism, which suggested a moderate level of internal consistency. The elderly who was optimistic have a higher average score of health behaviors than the elderly who were less optimistic (13.41 vs. 13.27, p < 0.001). Participants who were optimistic were more likely than participants who were less optimistic to be male, younger, have a higher level of education, no spouse, a higher level of ADL, less kinds of chronic diseases, higher decision-making power in the family, higher level of family economic status, fewer children, health insurance, pension insurance, live in town and live with family members (Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of analytic variables at baseline (n = 13,370)
Full size table

To more intuitively show the relationship between optimism and the survival rate, we give the relationship graph between two categories of optimism and the survival rate. Figure 3 shows that the longer the follow-up time was, the lower the survival rate among the elderly. Compared to less optimistic individuals, optimistic individuals had a survival advantage (log rank test, p < 0.001). We found that optimism was positively associated with higher survival rates. According to Fig. 3, we could know that there may be a connection between optimism and survival rates, and we would further explore the relationship between optimism and mortality.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Kaplan–Meier analysis of survival according to two categories of optimism

Full size image

In Table 2, model 1 investigated mainly the association between sociodemographic and family/social support characteristics and mortality, and the outcomes showed that gender, age, marital status, residence, ADL, chronic diseases, decision-making power in the family, and co-residence with family members were significantly associated with elderly mortality. Model 2 investigated mainly the association between optimism and mortality after adjustment for sociodemographic and family/social support characteristics. Compared to the elderly who were less optimistic, optimistic older adults were significantly associated with a decreased mortality rate (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88 − 0.98). In model 3, health behaviors were included, and the protective effect of optimism on mortality decreased (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.89 − 0.99), which showed that health behaviors are key elements that play a positive role in survival (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.94 − 0.96), and optimism were more protective against survival than health behaviors.

Table 2 Hazard ratios of mortality by optimism over 10 years of follow-up
Full size table

To further clarify the mechanism by which optimism is correlated with mortality, we examined the mediating effect of health behaviors on the relationship between optimism and mortality. The results are shown in Table 3. In Model 4, optimism was regressed on mortality, and optimism had a significant correlation with mortality (Path c: β = -0.070, 95% bootstrap CI = -0.12 − -0.02). In Model 5, optimism was regressed on health behaviors, and optimism had a positive correlation with health behaviors (Path a: β = 0.086, 95% bootstrap CI = 0.07 − 0.14). In Model 6, optimism and health behaviors were simultaneously regressed on mortality. The negative effect of optimism on mortality decreased (Path c’: β = -0.065, 95% bootstrap CI = -0.09 − -0.05), and health behaviors had a significant correlation with mortality (Path b: β = -0.053, 95% bootstrap CI = -0.09 − -0.05). The mediating effect was -0.005 (a × b = 0.086 × -0.053, 95% bootstrap CI = 0.03 − 0.09), and the 95% bootstrap CIs do not include zero, which showed that health behaviors played an intermediary role in the relationship between optimism and mortality. In addition, the total effect of optimism on mortality is -0.070, the direct effect is -0.065, and the indirect effect is -0.005. The results indicate that health behaviors partially mediated the effect of optimism on mortality, and that 7.15% of this effect can be explained by mediating effects.

Table 3 Analysis of mediating effect of health behaviors
Full size table

Discussion

The findings of this study highlight the importance of optimism and its positive influence on survival, and health behaviors played an intermediary role in the relationship between optimism and survival. Elderly individuals who were optimistic had a higher level of health behaviors and lower mortality than those who were less optimistic during 10 years of follow-up while controlling for sociodemographic and family/social support characteristics. Optimism was more protective against survival than health behaviors.

There are different explanations for how optimism affects survival among the elderly. One explanation is that optimism can reduce negative emotion (e.g., anxiety and stress) and reduce the incidence of various mental illnesses, which was discussed mainly from the perspective of psychological mechanisms. Optimism, as a key part of psychological resources, can help individuals perceive less stress by promoting positive relations with others, positive reappraisal and a problem-solving approach toward stressful situations, thereby reducing the activation of stress regulatory systems [15, 18]. Considering psychosocial pathways, more optimistic individuals may experience less extreme emotional reactivity to and faster recovery from acute stressors.Optimists think favorable outcomes are possible; they may be more likely to set goals and resolutely pursue goal-related tasks, persist in the face of challenge, seek information to deal with future health risks, act in ways that are consistent with reducing future dangers, and use effective coping strategies when they encounter stressors such as problem-focused coping [19, 52]. When faced with adversity, elderly individuals with more optimism show reduced physiological responses, including lower heart rate [21], blood pressure [11] and cortisol [26], which could obviously reduce the rate of mental illnesses [34] and mortality [9].

Another explanation is that optimismcould promote health behaviors to increase the chance of survival. The study found that elderly individuals with optimism and higher scores of health behaviors could promote their physical health. Optimism can directly increase engagement in health behaviors, which is consistent with the idea that optimism is positively associated with health behaviors independent of chronic illness, medication usage, and both individual and area-based indices of socio-economic status [3, 24, 25]. Theorists posit that individual with greater optimism enjoy better health outcomes because they engage in healthier behaviors such as exercising, eating fruits and vegetables, and avoiding cigarette smoking [2, 7, 26]. Healthier diet and physical activity are important elements for healthy aging, and optimism could increase the frequency of these health behaviors [27]. Another study found that optimism was a strong predictor of sleep quality, and older people who sleep better have healthier diets, more stable relationships and longer lives [53]. Optimism can improve the health literacy of the elderly, guide them to make health plans and avoid bad behavior habits, which plays an important role in improving the quality of life of the elderly [10].

The study found that health behaviors are a major predictor of mortality and positively influenced by optimism, and health behaviors mediate the association between optimism and survival. In our study, health behaviors were mainly composed of different levels of physical activity, social activity, smoking status and alcohol consumption, which played a key role in the health outcome and survival among older individuals. Moreover, health behaviors are often assessed with bipolar scales—for example, physical activity may be measured with a scale ranging from inactivity (i.e., sedentary behaviors) to vigorous activity. However, being inactive may have different correlates than vigorously engaging in exercise does (e.g., sedentary behaviors are associated with an increased risk of disease independent of physical activity) [33, 34]. In our study, sedentary behaviors were not included in the health behaviors, which ensured the consistency of unilateral measures of health behaviors. Smoking and alcohol consumption were key elements affecting mortality. Research has suggested that smoking intensity (i.e., years of smoking, number of cigarettes per day) influences associations between smoking and health outcomes [54]. Previous studies have found that optimism significantly reduces the frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption, which is an important factor in promoting their health [3, 55]. Therefore, smoking and consumption of alcohol were included in the health behaviors of our study, and empirical studies have illustrated that not smoking and low consumption of alcohol are significantly associated with reduced mortality among older adults.

Our study found that health behaviors reduced the mortality rate less than optimism. Health behaviors are an important mediator of the association between optimism and survival and are significantly associated with health outcomes and survival status. In fact, the mind often affects daily life through behaviors, and nourishing the mind and regulating behaviors have always been the pillars of health preservation advocated by traditional Chinese medicine [56]. Older people who have a negative emotion (e.g., pessimism) are more likely to be overeating and sedentary [57], but optimistic individuals are more likely to participate in social activities and maintain healthy eating habits [4]. How to maintain the consistency of mental status and daily actions and improve the levels of optimism and health behaviors are important tasks of health management for the elderly. However, we found that older adults did not receive high scores on health behaviors and the proportion of elderly individuals without optimism was high, which indicated that Chinese elderly adults are not in good mental and physical health. The Chinese government should further improve its public health policy, such as strengthening the construction of sports hardware facilities and promoting more health education and guidance. Interventions focused on health maintenance and improvement in elderly adults represent frequently combined health promotion and psychological disease prevention actions [58]. Only by strengthening their own health management can the elderly make positive psychology effectively guide health behaviors, to improve the quality of life in their aging process.

Several limitations should be considered. First, unmeasured confounding is always possible in observational studies. For example, a genetic predisposition to good health could lead to higher optimism. While we cannot completely rule out this possibility, we did control for a range of potential confounders, including ADL and chronic diseases. Additionally, strong genetic variants associated with optimism have not yet been found. Second, self-reported evaluation of health behaviors may be an imprecise method for estimating the type and duration of physical activity. In fact, physical activities consist of not only the frequency but also the time and intensity, all of which need to be measured. More precise measures of health behaviors should be involved in future studies. Furthermore, depression is a significant factor affecting mortality in the elderly. Generally, studies have included depression as an important control variable in the analysis of the relationship between optimism and mortality. However, variables of depression were not available in the CLHLS, which may introduce some biases.

Conclusions

This study found that optimism and health behaviors are significantly associated with survival among elderly Chinese individuals. Optimism and health behaviors were positively correlated with survival, and the positive effect of optimism on survival was larger than the positive effect of health behaviors. Health behaviors played an intermediary role in the relationship between optimism and survival. Our findings suggest that optimism and health behaviors could promote health and longevity among the elderly. Policymakers should formulate valuable targets to promote individual health by fostering psychological resources and encouraging the elderly to engage in some kinds of health behaviors (e.g., exercising and eating more vegetables) and to participate in recreational and social activities, which could help them live longer in a healthier way. These findings have implications for understanding mental and behavioral factors that promote healthy and resilient aging.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ADL:

Activities of daily living

CI:

Confidence interval

CLHLS:

Chinese Longitudinal Health Longevity Survey

HR:

Hazard ratio

LEPS:

Life Evaluation and Personal Scale

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(6):1063–78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD. The heart’s content: the association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):655–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen HN, Scheier MF, Greenhouse JB. Optimism and physical health: a meta-analytic review. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(3):239–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9111-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Avvenuti G, Baiardini I, Giardini A. Optimism’s explicative role for chronic diseases. Front Psychol. 2016;7(3):295. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim ES, Hagan KA, Grodstein F, DeMeo DL, De Vivo I, Kubzansky LD. Optimism and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;185(1):21–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rozanski A, Bavishi C, Kubzansky LD, Cohen R. Association of optimism with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9): e1912200. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. James P, Kim ES, Kubzansky LD, Zevon ES, Trudel-Fitzgerald C, Grodstein F. Optimism and healthy aging in women. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(1):116–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chida Y, Steptoe A. Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(7):741–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e31818105ba.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, Hoekstra T, Schouten EG. optimism and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a prospective cohort of elderly dutch men and women. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61(11):1126–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accreview.2004.12.131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Scheier MF, Carver CS. optimism and physical health: a long look back, a quick look forward. Am Psychol. 2018;73(9):1082–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000384.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Giltay EJ, Kamphuis MH, Kalmijn S, Zitman FG, Kromhout D. optimism and the risk of cardiovascular death: the Zutphen elderly study. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(4):431–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.4.431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim ES, Smith J, Kubzansky LD. Prospective study of the association between optimism and incident heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2014;7(3):394–400. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.113.000644.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy BR, Slade MD, May J, Caracciolo EA. Physical recovery after acute myocardial infarction: positive age self-stereotypes as a resource. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2006;62(4):285–301. https://doi.org/10.2190/EJK1-1Q0D-LHGE-7A35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tindle H, Belnap BH, Houck PR, Mazumdar S, Scheier MF, Matthews KA, et al. Optimism, response to treatment of depression, and rehospitalization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Psychosom Med. 2012;74(2):200–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e318244903f.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Boehm JK, Chen Y, Williams DR, Ryff C, Kubzansky LD. Unequally distributed psychological assets: are there social disparities in optimism, life satisfaction, and positive affect? PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0118066. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118066

  16. Gruenewald TL, Karlamangla AS, Greendale GA, Singer BH, Seeman TE. Feelings of usefulness to others, disability, and mortality in older adults: the Macarthur study of successful aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62(1):28–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.1.P28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Busch V, Van Stel HF, Schrijvers AJ, de Leeuw JR. Clustering of health-related behaviors, health outcomes and demographics in Dutch adolescents: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1118. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gawronski KA, Kim ES, Langa KM, Kubzansky LD. optimism and incidence of cognitive impairment in older adults. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(7):819–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kubzansky LD, Boehm JK, Segerstrom SC. Positive psychological functioning and the biology of health. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2016;9(12):645–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, Buijsse B, Kromhout D. Lifestyle and dietary correlates of optimism in men: the Zutphen elderly study. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63(5):483–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernandez DM, Larson JL, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Associations between health literacy and preventive health behaviors among older adults: findings from the health and retirement study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:596. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3267-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Conry MC, Morgan K, Curry P, McGee H, Harrington J, Ward M, et al. The clustering of health behaviours in Ireland and their relationship with mental health, self-rated health and quality of life. BMC Public Health. 2011;6(11):692. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim J, Chun S, Heo J, Lee S, Han A. Contribution of leisure-time physical activity on psychological benefits among elderly immigrants. Appl Res Qual Life. 2016;11(2):461–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-014-9374-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rizzuto D, Mossello E, Fratiglioni L, Santoni G, Wang HX. Personality and survival in older age: the role of lifestyle behaviors and health status. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;25(12):1363–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2017.06.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Steptoe A, Wright C, Kunz-Ebrecht SR, Iliffe S. optimism and health behaviour in community-dwelling older people: associations with healthy ageing. Br J Health Psychol. 2006;11(1):71–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hingle MD, Wertheim BC, Tindle HA, Tinker L, Seguin RA, Rosal MC, et al. Optimism and diet quality in the women’s health initiative. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014;114(7):1036–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2013.12.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Progovac AM, Donohue JM, Matthews KA, Chang CH, Habermann EB, Kuller LH, et al. Optimism predicts sustained vigorous physical activity in postmenopausal women. Prev Med Rep. 2017;8:286–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dohrn IM, Welmer AK, Hagströmer M. Accelerometry-assessed physical activity and sedentary time and associations with chronic disease and hospital visits - a prospective cohort study with 15 years follow-up. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0878-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chiuve SE, Rexrode KM, Spiegelman D, Logroscino G, Manson JE, Rimm EB. Primary prevention of stroke by healthy lifestyle. Circulation. 2008;118(9):947–54. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.781062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Cui GH, Li SJ, Yin YT, Chen LJ, Li JQ, Liang FY, et al. The relationship among social capital, eHealth literacy and health behaviours in Chinese elderly people: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10037-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen G, Steinberg DM, Keinan-Boker L, Shaked O, Goshen A, Shimony T, et al. Leisure-time physical activity and cancer risk among older adults: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2020;4(2):115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim N, Kim H, Kwon S. Factors associated with different numbers of health behaviors by living arrangements. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09242-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tully MA, McMullan I, Blackburn NE, Wilson JJ, Bunting B, Smith L, et al. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and mental health in older adults: an isotemporal substitution model. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(10):1957–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim ES, Park N, Peterson C. optimism protects older adults from stroke: the health and retirement study. Stroke. 2011;42(10):2855–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim ES, Kubzansky LD, Soo J, Boehm JK. Maintaining healthy behavior: a prospective study of psychological well-being and physical activity. Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(3):337–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9856-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeng Y, Chen H, Shi X, Yin Z, Yang Z, Gu J, et al. Health consequences of familial longevity influence among the Chinese elderly. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68(4):473–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeng Y, Feng Q, Hesketh T, Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study. Lancet. 2017;389(10079):1619–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30548-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Li T, Yang YC, Zhang Y. Culture, economic development, social-network type, and mortality: Evidence from Chinese older adults. Soc Sci Med. 2018;204:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhu A, Zeng Y, Ji J. Residential greenness alters serum 25(OH)D concentrations: a longitudinal cohort of Chinese older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(12):1968–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2020.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng Y, V Aupel JW. Association of late childbearing with healthy longevity among oldest-old in China. Popul Res. 2004;58(1):37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472032000175437

  41. Gerstorf D, Ram N. Inquiry into terminal decline: five objectives for future study. Gerontologist. 2013;53(5):727–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zeng Y, Feng Q, Gu D, Vaupel JW. Demographics, phenotypic health characteristics and genetic analysis of centenarians in China. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017;165:86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2016.12.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zeng Y, Vaupel JE. Functional capacity and self-evaluation of health and life of oldest old in China. J Soc Issues. 2010;58(4):733–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tindle HA, Chang YF, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Robinson JG, Rosal MC, Siegle GJ, Matthews KA. Optimism, cynical hostility, and incident coronary heart disease and mortality in the Women’s Healt Initiative. Circulation. 2009;120(8):656–62. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.827642.

  45. Weitzer J, Papantoniou K, Lázaro-Sebastià C, Seidel S, Klösch G, Schernhammer E. The contribution of dispositional optimism to understanding insomnia symptomatology: Findings from a cross-sectional population study in Austria. J Sleep Res. 2021;30(1): e13132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pérez-Tasigchana RF, Sandoval-Insausti H, Donat-Vargas C, Banegas JR, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillon P. Combined impact of traditional and nontraditional healthy behaviors on frailty and disability: a prospective cohort study of older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(5):710.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.08.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jacobs JM, Maaravi Y, Stessman J. Optimism and longevity beyond age 85. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(10):1806–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glab051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. Survival analysis: A selflearning text, 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6646-9

  49. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hayes AF, Scharkow M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter? Psychol Sci. 2013;24(10):1918–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rasmussen HN, Wrosch C, Scheier MF, Carver CS. Self-regulation processes and health: the importance of optimism and goal adjustment. J Pers. 2010;74(6):1721–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00426.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lau EY, Hui CH, Lam J, Cheung SF. Sleep and optimism: a longitudinal study of bidirectional causal relationship and its mediating and moderating variables in a Chinese student sample. Chronobiol Int. 2017;34(3):360–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420528.2016.1276071.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jia H, Lubetkin EI. Dose-response effect of smoking status on quality-adjusted life years among U.S. adults aged 65 years and older. J Public Health. 2017;39(4):e194–201.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Feng Z, Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Social participation is an important health behaviour for health and quality of life among chronically ill older Chinese people. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Standl E, Theodorakis MJ, Erbach M, Schnell O, Tuomilehto J. On the potential of acarbose to reduce cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-13-81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Segerstrom SC, Evans DR, Eisenlohr-Moul TA. Optimism and pessimism dimensions in the Life Orientation Test-Revised: method and meaning. J Res Pers. 2011;45(1):126–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Duplaga M, Grysztar M, Rodzinka M, Kopec A. Scoping review of health promotion and disease prevention interventions addressed to elderly people. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(Suppl 5):278. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1521-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the CLHLS Program at Peking University (https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS) for providing access to the data.

Funding

This work was supported by Project of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (B20084), National Natural Science Foundation of China (71973154), Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (21YJCZH086), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2722022BQ056). The funders had no involvement in study design, data collection, statistical analysis and manuscript writing.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhang Yue and Hang Liang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China

    Zhang Yue, Hang Liang, Xigang Qin, Yang Ge & Nan Xiang

  2. Institute of Income Distribution and Public Finance, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, 430073, China

    Erpeng Liu

Authors
  1. Zhang Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hang Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xigang Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yang Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nan Xiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Erpeng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZY and HL has made contributions to conception and design and interpretation of data as well as being the main responsible in drafting the initial manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. EPL has contributed with analysis and interpretation of data and has also been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. YG, XQ and NX have been involved in revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erpeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study is a secondary analysis of the data from the CLHLS. The CLHLS study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052–13074). The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. And informed consent was obtained from literate participants and legal guardian(s)/next of kin of illiterate participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, Z., Liang, H., Qin, X. et al. Optimism and survival: health behaviors as a mediator—a ten-year follow-up study of Chinese elderly people. BMC Public Health 22, 670 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13090-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13090-3

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us