Skip to main content
Download PDF

Economic burden of varicella in Europe in the absence of universal varicella vaccination

BMC Public Health volume 21, Article number: 2312 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Though the disease burden of varicella in Europe has been reported previously, the economic burden is still unknown. This study estimated the economic burden of varicella in Europe in the absence of Universal Varicella Vaccination (UVV) in 2018 Euros from both payer (direct costs) and societal (direct and indirect costs) perspectives.

Methods

We estimated the country specific and overall annual costs of varicella in absence of UVV in 31 European countries (27 EU countries, plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom). To obtain country specific unit costs and associated healthcare utilization, we conducted a systematic literature review, searching in PubMed, EMBASE, NEED, DARE, REPEC, Open Grey, and public heath websites (1/1/1999–10/15/2019). The number of annual varicella cases, deaths, outpatient visits and hospitalizations were calculated (without UVV) based on age-specific incidence rates (Riera-Montes et al. 2017) and 2018 population data by country. Unit cost per varicella case and disease burden data were combined using stochastic modeling to estimate 2018 costs stratified by country, age and healthcare resource.

Results

Overall annual total costs associated with varicella were estimated to be €662,592,061 (Range: €309,552,363 to €1,015,631,760) in Europe in absence of UVV. Direct and indirect costs were estimated at €229,076,206 (Range €144,809,557 to €313,342,856) and €433,515,855 (Range €164,742,806 to €702,288,904), respectively. Total cost per case was €121.45 (direct: €41.99; indirect: €79.46). Almost half of the costs were attributed to cases in children under 5 years, owing mainly to caregiver work loss. The distribution of costs by healthcare resource was similar across countries. France and Germany accounted for 49.28% of total annual costs, most likely due to a combination of high numbers of cases and unit costs in these countries.

Conclusions

The economic burden of varicella across Europe in the absence of UVV is substantial (over 600 M€), primarily driven by caregiver burden including work productivity losses.

Peer Review reports

Background

Varicella-zoster virus, from the α-herpesvirus family, causes varicella (or chickenpox) on primary infection and herpes zoster (HZ) (or shingles) upon reactivation. Varicella is a highly communicable disease, typically affecting children 2–8 years of age [1, 2]. Varicella is usually mild with an average incubation period of 14–16 days and characterized by an itchy vesicular rash accompanied by fever and malaise. In some cases, serious complications such as superinfection of skin lesions or disseminated infections such as pneumonia and encephalitis may occur. These complications may require hospitalization, and may in rare instances, lead to long-term sequelae or death [2, 3]. Although the risk of complications is higher in infants, adults, pregnant women and immunocompromised persons, most varicella-related complications occur among immunocompetent children with no underlying medical conditions [3].

Varicella vaccines are safe and efficacious in preventing varicella, particularly severe varicella [3]. In the absence of universal immunization, the disease burden of varicella would be substantial with a total of 5.5 million (95% CI: 4.7–6.4) cases occurring annually across Europe, with the majority occurring in children younger than 5 years. Annually, this would result in 3–3.9 million varicella patients consulting a primary care physician, 18,200–23,500 hospitalizations, and 80 (95% CI: 19–822) deaths [4]. Because varicella-zoster virus is highly contagious, infection control practices in most countries include isolation of patients until lesions are crusted and dry, which usually takes about 7 days. The associated work absenteeism and productivity loss among caregivers and adult cases is expected to result in considerable economic impact at the population level, especially in the countries with high annual varicella case counts owing to large population [5,6,7,8,9].

In 2014, The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that countries which are able to sustain a vaccine coverage of at least 80% should consider introducing varicella into routine childhood immunization programs [10]. Yet, as of 2021, less than 50% of European countries have implemented Universal Varicella Vaccination (UVV) or have national recommendations for universal vaccination [11,12,13]. Identifying and measuring the costs attributable to varicella is important for decision-making about vaccination introduction [14]. Thus, we aimed to quantify the overall, as well as country-specific economic burden of varicella in Europe. Building on previous research on the burden of disease [4] in countries without universal immunization, we evaluated the varicella-associated costs from payer (direct costs) and societal perspectives (direct and indirect costs) in 31 European nations.

Methods

This study was conducted in three successive steps: 1. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain unit cost and healthcare resource utilization parameters; 2. Disease burden was updated using published incidence rates and 2018 population estimates; and 3. Economic burden was estimated by combining burden of disease and unit cost/utilization parameters. All costs were estimated for the 2018 European population (for 27 European Union countries, plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and the United Kingdom (UK)) and were reported in Euros (year 2018).

SLR for unit cost and utilization parameters

We conducted a SLR for peer-reviewed studies published between 1 January 1999 and 15 October 2019 in any language to obtain country-specific unit costs per varicella case and healthcare resource utilization parameters. The database search was conducted in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, NHS Economic Evaluation Database (NEED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), Research Papers in Economics (REPEC) and Open Grey. Data were also obtained from the WHO, European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) and national public health institutes websites. Two types of outcomes were of interest:

  1. 1.

    Unit cost items per varicella case: including outpatient physician visits, emergency room (ER) visits, hospital visits (outpatient unit of hospital), hospitalizations (total or one-day), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, other healthcare professionals visits (physiotherapist, psychologist, specialized physician and other healthcare professional), over-the-counter (OTC) medications, prescription medications in outpatients (e.g. antiviral medication), tests and procedures in outpatients.

  2. 2.

    Per case resource utilization: including length of hospitalization, work days lost by caregiver for outpatient/inpatient cases, work days lost by adult outpatient/inpatient cases, utilization rate for ER visits, hospital visits, ICU stays, OTC medications, other healthcare professional visits, prescription medications and tests and procedures.

The SLR was conducted in accordance with the standards of the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) guidelines and a flowchart was prepared to describe the process [15]. Titles and abstracts from the list of references were independently screened by MR and EM to identify studies that fulfilled the selection criteria. Studies were eligible for inclusion if 1) they concerned varicella-zoster virus primary infection (excluding studies on varicella-zoster reactivation alone), 2) provided data for at least one of the abovementioned outcomes of interest, 3) concerned data collected in a European country, and 4) were primary data (review publications were excluded although reference lists were screened to identify additional publications). Discrepancies were discussed and resolved without the need for a third reviewer. Subsequently, full-text eligibility was evaluated by the reviewers and relevant data extracted. The full search string used for the SLR is available in Additional file 1.

The extracted cost and utilization outcomes were summarized for each country. For countries with multiple entries per outcome, a range (min-max) was generated based on all values extracted. Values expressed in currency prior to 2018 were adjusted for inflation using the 2018 price index (Gross Domestic Product (GDP) price deflator) [16]. For countries for which no data was available for a given unit outcome, two different types of imputation values were generated: For utilization outcomes, we used the mean value from other countries with available data and for cost outcomes, we generated the input by weighting values by 2018 Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) [17]. Full details can be found in Additional file 2.

Disease burden parameters

We calculated the mean (range: min-max) annual number of varicella cases and deaths, outpatient visits and hospitalizations in 2018 using previously reported data on varicella incidence rates in Europe before UVV [4]. We updated these incidence numbers stratified by country and age group (< 5, 5–9, 10–14, 15–19, 20–39, 40–64 years) with 2018 population estimates (Additional file 3).

Total annual costs

Variables to be included in the model were chosen based on data availability, and information from at least five countries was required to include an outcome. The following outcomes were included: unit cost of outpatient visit/hospitalization/prescription medication/OTC medication and utilization (proportion) of prescription medication/OTC medication, length of hospital stay, and number of work days lost by caregiver/adult case. To account for the uncertainty of the input parameters, assuming that all values falling within the min-max range were equally probable, a uniform distribution (min-max) was assigned to each parameter in our model. The parameter distributions were then combined through stochastic modeling; a total of 10,000 iterations were ran, and the mean and min-max output of the output values were used to estimate the population-level direct costs (outpatient visits, hospitalizations, prescription/OTC medications) and indirect costs (work loss caregivers/patients/deaths) were estimated for the 31 European countries. The distribution of costs by country, age group and healthcare resource was described. Finally, the mean (direct/indirect/total) costs per varicella case were calculated by dividing the total annual costs by the number of annual varicella cases in Europe. In addition, sensitivity analysis was conducted by: 1. considering only countries without general recommendation for publicly funded varicella vaccination as of 2021 [13], 2. adjusting the unit costs of the tradeable health care costs (i.e. OTC and prescription medication) using exchange rates. The final cost model is described in Additional file 4.

Results

As described in the PRISMA diagram (Fig. 1), 120 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, of which 68 were selected for data extraction. The extracted data is described in Table 1. Hungary, Poland and Spain were the countries for which data was retrieved for the highest number of cost/utilization outcomes. In four countries- Austria, Cyprus, Finland and Iceland- no varicella unit cost/utilization data was retrieved.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA Flow Diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Data extraction summary of unit cost and health resource utilization items
Full size table

The outcomes with sufficient data (i.e. > 5 countries with at least one data source) are described in Table 2, stratified by high income countries versus middle and low income countries. The updated 2018 number of annual varicella cases, deaths, outpatient visits and hospitalizations as well as the full extracted unit cost and utilization outcomes are available in Additional files 3 and 5, respectively.

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of extracted unit cost and utilization outcomes in high income (Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and UK) and low- and middle-income (Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland and Romania) countries
Full size table

Overall annual total costs associated with varicella in Europe were €662,592,061 (Min-Max: €309,552,363–€1,015,631,760) (Table 3). Direct and indirect costs were estimated at €229,076,206 (Min-Max: €144,809,557–€313,342,856) and €433,515,855 (Min-Max: €164,742,806–€702,288,904). Average total cost per case was estimated at €121.45 (Min-Max: €56.74–€186.17), of which €41.99 (Min-Max: €26.54–€57.44) were direct costs and €79.46 (Min-Max: €30.20–€128.73) were indirect costs. Varicella deaths represented only a limited proportion of indirect costs (0.051%).

Table 3 Estimated annual direct and indirect costs (million €) associated with varicella in Europe in absence of UVV
Full size table

Almost half of the total costs were associated with cases in children below 5 years of age (Table 4), of which indirect costs due to work absenteeism among caregivers represented 61.65% (Fig. 2). Countries with the highest varicella-associated costs in the absence of universal vaccination were France and Germany (Table 3), which together accounted for 49.28% of total costs. These two countries and the UK also had the highest number of annual varicella cases (France: 794,533; Germany: 761,182; UK: 788,581). The distribution of total varicella costs by type of healthcare resource was similar across European countries (Fig. 3) with indirect costs due to work loss among caregivers or patients accounting for the largest proportion of costs in almost all countries. Among the direct cost components, the major cost drivers were primary care visits (16% of total costs, range 6% in Germany to 43% in Poland), followed by hospitalizations (8% of total costs, range 2% in Ireland to 21% in Romania).

Table 4 Estimated Distribution of varicella costs (€) in Europe by age group and health care resource in absence of UVV
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of age-specific varicella costs by healthcare resource [Proportion (%)]

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Distribution of country-specific varicella costs by healthcare resource [proportion (%)]

Full size image

When the 9 countries with UVV were excluded from the analysis, the total costs were €366,839,010 (Min-Max: €199,562,734–€534,115,287). Adjusting the unit costs of the tradeable health care costs (OTC and prescription medication) using exchange rates instead of PPP resulted in a reduction of total costs of 662,375 EUR (0.1% of total costs).

Discussion

The estimated economic burden of varicella in the absence of UVV across 31 European countries would be substantial, amounting to over €660 million annually in 2018 Euros. Of the total cost, 65% were attributed to work loss suggesting a significant societal burden and impact on productivity. To our knowledge, this study is the first study to systematically estimate the economic burden of varicella for individual European countries. The substantial costs associated with productivity losses estimated in our study are in line with findings from previous systematic literature reviews on varicella burden [3, 83]. Banz et al. [5] found that prior to routine vaccination implementation, in Germany, 82% of varicella-associated costs were attributable to work loss. Another study from the US conducted during the pre-vaccine era also concluded that costs associated with parental work absenteeism represented 95% of the total cost [84].

Primary care visits were the key driver among direct costs associated with varicella in almost all countries (46% of direct costs on average). It was previously shown that most varicella cases in Europe lead to a physician consultation (54%), whereas only a minority of cases (0.3%) are hospitalized [4]. This is consistent with the literature considering the relatively mild nature of the disease in young children.

The greatest share of costs was associated with cases in children younger than 5 years, reflecting that varicella incidence is highest in this age group [4], whereas higher rates of varicella-associated complications and hospitalization occurred in the 10–14 year and 20–39 year age groups.

The distribution of varicella costs by healthcare resource appeared to be generally similar across European countries. In the absence of UVV, more than three-quarters (77.40%) of the total varicella costs would be attributable to five countries, namely France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. These countries represent the top-five European countries in terms of population size and annual varicella case counts. Annual varicella costs estimated in 2002 for France (148€ million) and Germany (144€ million) before introduction of routine immunization were in line with our findings [5]. Furthermore, France, Germany and UK are among the countries with the highest minimum daily wage (France: €74.92, Germany: €74.9 and UK: €73.36 compared to the median European minimum wage of €42.14). However, it is worth noting that nine countries (Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Italy, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland) did not have a national minimum wage during the study period [85]. Therefore, the minimum wage was extrapolated using data from the other 22 countries, potentially leading to a bias in the indirect costs for the former countries.

While varicella is commonly perceived as a mild disease, our study shows that it can pose significant economic and caregiver burden. It is important to consider strategies to reduce the clinical and economic burden of varicella across Europe. As of January 2021, nine European countries had UVV [13]. Countries that implemented UVV experienced a significant decline in the varicella burden [3, 11] and several studies indicated that varicella vaccination is cost-saving if productivity losses are considered [10, 11, 83, 86,87,88]. For example, in Spain, the country with the highest proportion of direct costs in this study (Fig. 3), it was demonstrated that routine vaccination in children aged 1–2 years is cost-saving regardless of indirect costs [25]. European countries may consider UVV depending upon the country-specific burden of disease and the cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination in their country. Recently published studies have demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of implementing UVV in UK, Italy, Norway and Turkey [9, 88,89,90]. A budget impact analysis for Denmark [26] showed that the cost of implementation of two-dose UVV program with Varivax® was €5.29–6.76 million depending on vaccination coverage and vaccine cost. This is less than the annual cost of €7.23 million associated with the disease in Denmark [91]. Some disease models have predicted an increase in HZ after implementing UVV programs due to a reduction in circulating VZV [92,93,94]. However, several epidemiological studies as well as recent modeling studies showed no evidence of an increase in HZ incidence post-UVV [89, 95,96,97,98,99,100].

The main limitation of our study concerns the lack of availability of several unit cost and utilization input parameters, such as the cost of tests or procedures, which were not included in the final model. Moreover, the extrapolation of data from countries with available information to other countries lacking such data might have introduced a bias due to heterogeneity of health resource costs and resource utilization rates that occurs across countries. Health-economic results are usually not directly comparable from one country to the other and need specific adjustments [9, 86, 101]. Similarly, the disease burden parameters may also have been under- or overestimated since similar imputation methods have been used in the Riera-Montes et al. study [4], and some of the data sources might not be representative of the current situation. However, we have tried to address these multiple sources of uncertainty by adjusting unit costs for inflation and PPP, and conducting stochastic modeling [101]. Adjusting the unit costs of the tradeable health care costs (OTC and prescription medication) using exchange rates resulted in a reduction of total costs of only 0.1% of total costs, thereby suggesting the robustness of our primary approach of adjusting all unit costs by PPP [17, 102, 103]. Another limitation is that potential long-term complications and sequelae such as congenital varicella syndrome or severe cutaneous scarring were not included in this cost-analysis due to lack of data on such costs, leading to possible underestimation of total disease burden. Long-term sequelae are reported in 0.4–3.1% of patients hospitalized due to varicella infections [3]. Additionally, we chose to be conservative with respect to indirect costs since we considered minimum wages, whereas several other economic studies have based their cost estimation on average wages instead [19]. Although small, the unit cost of premature burial [104] estimated at €1008 and the annual premature burial costs without UVV in Europe estimated at €80,672 (representing an increase of 0.01% of total costs), were not accounted for in our study resulting in conservative estimates of total costs of varicella. Lastly, although burden of disease input parameters were stratified by age, our model did not consider potential age-related differences in the unit parameters. Nevertheless, the uncertainty among input parameters was accounted for by combining SLR and stochastic approaches. Furthermore, our study is aligned with previous cost-effectiveness analyses that emphasize the importance of capturing indirect costs to provide a comprehensive picture of the economic burden associated with varicella [11, 105].

It is important to state that we have not investigated in our study the burden due to the loss in quality of life (QoL) nor the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) although the latter is widely used as measure of the incremental effect in economic evaluations of vaccination. On the basis of Health Utilities Index mark 2 (HUI2) ratings, Brisson et al. [35] found 0.004 and 0.005 QALY loss per episode of varicella, for children younger than 14 years and individuals 15 years and older, respectively. Bilcke et al. [38] found a slightly higher QALY loss, of 0.004 or 0.010, depending whether the patient consulted a physician or not.

Conclusions

Varicella has a significant public health impact. Its economic burden in absence of UVV is considerable in Europe, mainly owing to high disease incidence and associated health care resource use and caregiver burden including work productivity losses. Assessing the economic burden of a disease is essential for prioritizing healthcare interventions among competing vaccine-preventable diseases, and this analysis underscores the need for more country-specific evaluations to allow informed decision making. These country specific economic data could be used for potential country-specific cost-effectiveness evaluations that would be valuable to support national immunization policy decisions.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article (including unit cost and utilization outcomes) are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

ECDC:

European Center for Disease Prevention and Control

ER:

Emergency Room

GDP:

Gross Domestic Product

HZ:

Herpes Zoster

ICU:

Intensive Care Unit

OTC:

Over-the-counter

PPP:

Purchasing Power Parities

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

SLR:

Systematic Literature Review

UK:

United Kingdom

UVV:

Universal Varicella Vaccination

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(3):361–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heininger U, Seward JF. Varicella. Lancet. 2006;368(9544):1365–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ECDC. Varicella vaccination in the European Union. Stockholm: ECDC GUIDANCE nwww.ecdc.europa.eu; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Riera-Montes M, et al. Estimation of the burden of varicella in Europe before the introduction of universal childhood immunization. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):353.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Banz K, et al. The burden of varicella in Germany. Potential risks and economic impact. Eur J Health Econ. 2004;5(1):46–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Coudeville, L., et al., The economic value of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany. 2005, HAL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Damm O, et al. Epidemiology and economic burden of measles, mumps, pertussis, and varicella in Germany: a systematic review. Int J Public Health. 2016;61(7):847–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Díez-Domingo J, et al. Epidemiology and economic impact of varicella in immunocompetent children in Spain. A nation-wide study. Vaccine. 2003;21(23):3236–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haugnes H, Flem E, Wisløff T. Healthcare costs associated with varicella and herpes zoster in Norway. Vaccine. 2019;37(29):3779–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. WHO. Varicella and herpes zoster vaccines: WHO position paper, June 2014. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2014;89(25):265–87.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spoulou V, et al. Implementing universal varicella vaccination in Europe: the path forward. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(2):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bechini A, et al. Impact of universal vaccination against varicella in Italy: experiences from eight Italian regions. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(1):63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. ECDC, Vaccine schedules in all countries of the European Union. 2020. https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu/.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Segel JE. Cost-of-illness studies—a primer. RTI-UNC Center of Excellence in Health Promotion Economics; 2006. p. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liberati A, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eurostat, Eurostat GDP data. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/national-accounts/data/database 2019.

  17. Eurostat, Eurostat PPP data. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/purchasing-power-parities/data/database 2019.

  18. Banz K, et al. Economic evaluation of varicella vaccination in Swiss children and adolescents. Hum Vaccin. 2009;5(12):847–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Coudeville L, et al. The economic value of childhood varicella vaccination in France and Germany. Value Health. 2005;8(3):209–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanslik T, et al. Varicella in French adolescents and adults: individual risk assessment and cost-effectiveness of routine vaccination. Vaccine. 2003;21(25–26):3614–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Littlewood KJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of routine varicella vaccination using the measles, mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine in France: an economic analysis based on a dynamic transmission model for varicella and herpes zoster. Clin Ther. 2015;37(4):830–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Blasco GP, Blasco Pérez-Aramendía J. A cost-benefit analysis of varicella vaccination in Aragón. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017;115(5):432–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Díez Domingo J, et al. A cost benefit analysis of routine varicella vaccination in Spain. Vaccine. 1999;17(11–12):1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Forcén T, et al. Economic evaluation of routine vaccination of 15 month old children against chicken-pox-zoster. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2000;23(1):115–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lenne X, et al. Economic evaluation of varicella vaccination in Spain-results from a dynamic model. Vaccine. 2006;24(47–48):6980–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Peña-Rey I, et al. Cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination in Spanish adolescents. Gac Sanit. 2004;18(4):287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Pérez-Rubio A, et al. Social and economic impact of chicken pox vaccine at 15 months of age. Castile and Leon, Spain, 2004. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2008;82(1):101–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plans-Rubió P. Critical prevalence of antibodies minimizing vaccination costs for hepatitis a, hepatitis B, varicella, measles and tetanus in adults and adolescents in Catalonia. Spain Vaccine. 2004;22(29–30):4002–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Valadés FJ, et al. Chickenpox outbreak in Herrera del Duque, Badajoz, Spain. Gac Sanit. 2003;17(3):196–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meszner Z, et al. Economic burden of varicella in children 1-12 years of age in Hungary, 2011-2015. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):495.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gialloreti LE, et al. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccine programmes based on an observational survey in the Latium region of Italy. Herpes. 2005;12(2):33–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thiry N, et al. An economic evaluation of varicella vaccination in Italian adolescents. Vaccine. 2004;22(27–28):3546–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Boot HJ, et al. Assessing the introduction of universal varicella vaccination in the Netherlands. Vaccine. 2006;24(37–39):6288–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wysocki J, et al. Varicella in Poland: economic burden in children 1-12 years of age in Poland, 2010-2015. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):410.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Brisson M, Edmunds WJ. Varicella vaccination in England and Wales: cost-utility analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(10):862–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pinot De Moira A, Edmunds WJ, Breuer J. The cost-effectiveness of antenatal varicella screening with post-partum vaccination of susceptibles. Vaccine. 2006;24(9):1298–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Van Hoek AJ, et al. The cost-effectiveness of varicella and combined varicella and herpes zoster vaccination programmes in the United Kingdom. Vaccine. 2012;30(6):1225–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bilcke J, et al. The health and economic burden of chickenpox and herpes zoster in Belgium. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;140(11):2096–109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Knuf M, Neiß A, Wutzler P. Impact of universal varicella vaccination in Germany: an epidemiological and economic analysis. Klinische Padiatrie. 2006;218(4):203–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gil Á, et al. The burden of severe varicella in Spain, 1995-2000 period. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004;19(7):699–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gil A, et al. Epidemiology of primary varicella hospitalizations in Spain. Vaccine. 2001;20(3–4):295–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gómez MR, et al. Complications of varicella in children. An Esp Pediatr. 1999;50(3):259–62.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Guillen JM, et al. Burden of adult varicella hospitalizations in Spain (2001-2007). Human Vaccines. 2010;6(8):659–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guillén JM, et al. Paediatric hospitalizations attributable to varicella zoster virus infections. Pediatrika. 2006;26(9):32–7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Piqueras Arenas AI, et al. Hospitalizations for varicella in the Hospital Infantil La Fe, Valencia,Spain, 2001-2004. An Pediatr. 2005;63(2):120–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Coudeville L, et al. The value of varicella vaccination in healthy children: cost-benefit analysis of the situation in France. Vaccine. 1999;17(2):142–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mallet E, et al. Evaluation of varicella complications through a retrospective hospital survey in a paediatric center over 16 years in France. Arch Pediatr. 2004;11(9):1145–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Azzari C, et al. Cost of varicella-related hospitalisations in an Italian paediatric hospital: comparison with possible vaccination expenses. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007;23(12):2945–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bonanni P, et al. Economic evaluation of varicella vaccination in Italian children and adolescents according to different intervention strategies: the burden of uncomplicated hospitalised cases. Vaccine. 2008;26(44):5619–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hobbelen PHF, et al. The burden of hospitalisation for varicella and herpes zoster in England from 2004 to 2013. J Infect. 2016;73(3):241–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Blumental S, et al. Varicella paediatric hospitalisations in Belgium: a 1-year national survey. Arch Dis Child. 2016;101(1):16–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bonhoeffer J, et al. Prospective surveillance of hospitalisations associated with varicella-zoster virus infections in children and adolescents. Eur J Pediatr. 2005;164(6):366–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Maresova V, et al. Varicella and its complications: a five-year retrospective analysis of hospitalized patients. Antibiotiques. 2006;8(3):131–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Helmuth IG, Poulsen A, Mølbak K. A national register-based study of paediatric varicella hospitalizations in Denmark 2010-2016. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(13):2683–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Liese JG, et al. The burden of varicella complications before the introduction of routine varicella vaccination in Germany. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27(2):119–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Streng A, et al. Decline of neurologic varicella complications in children during the first seven years after introduction of universal varicella vaccination in Germany, 2005-2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(1):79–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wutzler P, et al. Can varicella be eliminated by vaccination? Potential clinical and economic effects of universal childhood varicella immunisation in Germany. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2002;191(2):89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Theodoridou M, et al. Varicella-related complications and hospitalisations in a tertiary pediatric medical center before vaccine introduction. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165(4):273–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. González Santiago P, et al. Hospital admission due to varicella: A retrospective study. Acta Pediatr Esp. 2005;63(3):101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Guillén JM, et al. Varicella paediatric hospitalizations in Spain. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(4):519–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Peña-Rey I, et al. Epidemiology of varicella in Spain pre-and post-vaccination periods. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009;83(5):711–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Pérez-Yarza EG, et al. Hospital admissions for varicella complications in children aged less than 15 years old. An Pediatr. 2003;59(3):229–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Dubos F, et al. Epidemiology of hospital admissions for paediatric varicella infections: a one-year prospective survey in the pre-vaccine era. Epidemiol Infect. 2007;135(1):131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Emery C, et al. ENVOL study on the medical management of varicella and its complications in French ambulatory care. Med Mal Infect. 2006;36(2):92–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Grimprel E, et al. Paediatric varicella hospitalisations in France: a nationwide survey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(5):546–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lécuyer A, et al. Hospitalization of newborns and young infants for chickenpox in France. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169(10):1293–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Mandelcwajg A, et al. Causes of hospitalization of patients with ongoing varicella in a French children hospital: evolution between 1990 and 2001. Arch Pediatr. 2006;13(5):429–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bertoluzzo L, et al. The hospitalization because of varicella in a tertiary care pediatric hospital during 10 year study period. J Prev Med Hygiene. 2005;46(4):169–72.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Trucchi C, et al. Burden of varicella in Italy, 2001–2010: analysis of data from multiple sources and assessment of universal vaccination impact in three pilot regions. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64(11):1387–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wolleswinkel-van den Bosch JH, et al. The burden of varicella from a parent's perspective and its societal impact in The Netherlands: an Internet survey. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:320.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Mirinaviciute G, et al. Varicella-related primary health-care visits, hospitalizations and mortality in Norway, 2008-2014. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(11):1032–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gowin E, Wysocki J, Michalak M. Don't forget how severe varicella can be-complications of varicella in children in a defined polish population. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17(7):e485–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gowin E, et al. Too young to be vaccinated: hospitalizations caused by varicella among children in the first year of life. Int J Infect Dis. 2017;62:52–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Smukalska E, Dura B. Complications of chickenpox as reason for children's hospitalization. Przegl Epidemiol. 2004;58(Suppl 1):134–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Popescu CP, et al. Complications of varicella in unvaccinated children from Romania, 2002-2013: a retrospective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35(2):211–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Widgren K, et al. The burden of chickenpox disease in Sweden. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):666.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Wagenpfeil S, et al. Empirical data on the varicella situation in Germany for vaccinatin decisions. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(5):425–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Fornaro P, et al. Epidemiology and cost analysis of varicella in Italy: results of a sentinel study in the pediatric practice. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18(5):414–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Van Lier A, et al. Low varicella-related consultation rate in the Netherlands in primary care data. Vaccine. 2014;32(28):3517–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rodriguez-Santana Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics and the approach to infant chickenpox in primary care. Eur J Pediatr. 2019;178(5):641–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Volpi A, et al. Antiviral treatment of varicella in pediatric practice in the latium region of Italy: results of an observational study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002;21(8):739–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Pierik JG, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and societal burden of varicella zoster virus in the Netherlands. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Rozenbaum MH, et al. Cost-effectiveness of varicella vaccination programs: an update of the literature. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7(6):753–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Preblud SR. Varicella: complications and costs. Pediatrics. 1986;78(4):728–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Eurostat, Minimum wage statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Minimum_wage_statistics#General_overview, 2018.

  86. Rentier B, Gershon AA. Consensus: varicella vaccination of healthy children - a challenge for Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(5):379–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Coudeville L, et al. Varicella vaccination in Italy: an economic evaluation of different scenarios. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(13):839–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Azzari C, et al. The cost-effectiveness of universal varicella vaccination in Italy: a model-based assessment of vaccination strategies. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020;12:273–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Wolfson LJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal varicella vaccination in Turkey using a dynamic transmission model. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Akpo EI, Cristeau O, Hunjan M, Casabona G. Epidemiological Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Varicella Vaccination Strategies in the United Kingdom. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(11):e3617–26.

  91. Pawaskar, M., et al. Varicella National Immunization Program in Denmark in ISPOR Europe 2020 (virtual). 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Brisson M, et al. Modelling the impact of immunization on the epidemiology of varicella zoster virus. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;125(3):651–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Damm O, et al. Systematic review of models assessing the economic value of routine varicella and herpes zoster vaccination in high-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):533.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Horn J, et al. Current and future effects of varicella and herpes zoster vaccination in Germany – insights from a mathematical model in a country with universal varicella vaccination. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016;12(7):1766–76.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Betta M, et al. Models for optimally controlling varicella and herpes zoster by varicella vaccination: a comparative study. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019;57(5):1121–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Harpaz R. Do varicella vaccination programs change the epidemiology of herpes zoster? A comprehensive review, with focus on the United States. Expert Rev Vaccin. 2019;18(8):793–811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Sauboin C, et al. The impact of childhood varicella vaccination on the incidence of herpes zoster in the general population: modelling the effect of exogenous and endogenous varicella-zoster virus immunity boosting. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):126.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Weinmann S, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of herpes zoster among children in the varicella vaccine era, 2005–2009. J Infect Dis. 2013;208(11):1859–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Weinmann S, et al. Incidence of herpes zoster among children: 2003–2014. Pediatrics. 2019;144(1):e20182917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Talbird SE, et al. Understanding the role of exogenous boosting in modeling varicella vaccination. Expert Rev Vaccin. 2018;17(11):1021–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Welte R, et al. A decision chart for assessing and improving the transferability of economic evaluation results between countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(13):857–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Niëns L, et al. Practical measurement of affordability: an application to medicines. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:219–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Petrou P, Talias MA. Navigating through the maze of pricing and affordability of branded pharmaceuticals in the midst of the financial crisis: a comparative study among five European recession countries, from a Cyprus perspective. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016;9(1):8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Ginsberg G, Somekh E. Cost containment analysis of childhood vaccination against varicella in Israel. J Infect. 2004;48(2):119–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Ultsch B, et al. Methods for health economic evaluation of vaccines and immunization decision frameworks: a consensus framework from a European vaccine economics community. Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(3):227–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Lara Wolfson for support on the study concept and protocol and Deshaun Parris for retrieving articles for the literature review.

Funding

This work was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Merck & Co., Inc. Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, 07033, USA

    Manjiri Pawaskar & Salome Samant

  2. P95 Epidemiology and Pharmacovigilance, Koning Leopold III laan 1, 3001, Leuven, Belgium

    Estelle Méroc & Margarita Riera-Montes

  3. MSD (Norge) AS, Postboks 458 Brakerøya, 3002, Drammen, Norway

    Elmira Flem

  4. MSD, Calle de Josefa Valcárcel, 38, 28027, Madrid, Spain

    Goran Bencina

  5. University of Basel Children’s Hospital (UKBB), Spitalstrasse 33, 4056, Basel, Switzerland

    Ulrich Heininger

  6. Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 61, 4056, Basel, Switzerland

    Ulrich Heininger

Authors
  1. Manjiri Pawaskar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Estelle Méroc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salome Samant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elmira Flem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Goran Bencina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Margarita Riera-Montes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ulrich Heininger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.P., G.B., E.M. and M.R. made substantial contributions to the study concept and protocol. M.R. and E.M. conducted the systematic review and the analyses. M.P., E.M., S.S., E.F., G.B., M.R. and U.H. contributed to interpretation of results and manuscript review, revisions and final approvals. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjiri Pawaskar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

M.P. and S.S. are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA and own stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. E.F. is an employee of MSD Norway AS and owns stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. G.B. is an employee of MSD Spain and owns stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. E.M. and M.R. have received consulting fees from Merck & Co for this work. U.H. has joined a varicella advisory board with MSD Switzerland after this project had been completed.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Search strategy Systematic literature review.

Additional file 2.

Data management.

Additional file 3.

Estimated disease burden in absence of UVV: annual varicella cases, deaths and resource utilization by country and age group.

Additional file 4.

Cost model.

Additional file 5.

Varicella unit cost and utilization outcomes (SLR outcomes).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pawaskar, M., Méroc, E., Samant, S. et al. Economic burden of varicella in Europe in the absence of universal varicella vaccination. BMC Public Health 21, 2312 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12343-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12343-x

Keywords

  • Varicella
  • Economic burden
  • Costs
  • Europe

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us