Skip to main content

Related Factors for Impaired Fasting Glucose in Korean Adults: A Population Based Study

Abstract

Background

Individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) who have poor health behaviors are at a greater risk for various health outcomes. This study compared the health behaviors and health literacy between individuals with non-IFG and IFG; factors that were associated with IFG were identified by sex.

Methods

This study was an observational study with a cross-sectional design based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) that used a stratified, multi-stage, cluster-sampling design to obtain a nationally representative sample. This study analyzed the KNHANES Health Examination Survey and Health Behavior Survey from 2016 to 2018 (N=9919). Multiple logistic regression analysis was employed to compute the odds ratios of health behaviors and health literacy to identify the risk factors for IFG.

Results

The prevalence of IFG among the total was 29.0% (weighted n=2826, 95% CI 27.8–30.2). In the IFG group, 63.6% were male and 36.4% were female (X2=320.57, p<.001). In multiple logistic regression by sex, the factors associated with IFG in male were as follows: age (50s; OR=2.36, 95% CI 1.79–3.13), high BMI (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.78–2.90), frequent drinking (OR=1.83, 95% CI 1.23–2.72), and using nutrition fact labels (OR=1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.75). Low economic status (OR=4.18, 95% CI 1.57–11.15) and high BMI (OR=2.35, 95% CI 1.29–4.28) were the affecting factors in female. On the other hand, employment status, perceived stress, and job type were not related to IFG in both male and female.

Conclusions

Strategies should be targeted to improve health behaviors and health literacy for those in their 40s and 60s, male in shift work, those who frequently dine out, overweight male, female with low economic statuses, and frequent drinkers. Moreover, healthcare providers should understand the barriers to health behaviors and literacy to effectively deliver healthcare service.

Peer Review reports

Background

Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) is known to progress to type 2 diabetes. It refers to a state in which an individual’s fasting blood glucose ranges from 100 to 125 mg/dl, just below the level for diabetes, which starts at 126mg/dl [1]. IFG has an extremely high probability of progressing to type 2 diabetes [2]. In an earlier longitudinal study, individuals with IFG were found to be more likely to transition to diabetes [3], and the incidence of diabetes is 10 times higher than those with normal blood glucose levels [2]. Although healthcare providers emphasize the importance of changing one’s lifestyle to prevent diabetes [4], individuals with IFG are nevertheless at risk of engaging in unhealthy eating habits, smoking, and the consumption of alcohol [5]. In particular, male in Korea engage in unhealthy behaviors such as drinking and smoking [6]. The Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool in the ADA (American Diabetes Association) guidelines includes a sex-specific category, and being male is recognized as a risk factor for diabetes [7].

Individuals with IFG should obtain and comprehend a wide range of health information to understand their situation and practice health behaviors [8]. In this regard, health literacy –the ability to understand basic health-related information and obtain and utilize services – is significantly correlated with patients’ abilities to practice health behaviors and maintain target blood glucose levels [9]. Previous studies have shown that individuals with lower levels of health literacy experience poor health conditions, poor management of health, and high medical expenses [10, 11]. However, these results have not been sufficiently consistent to provide evidence in terms of sex differences, issues on health literacy measurement methods, or health literacy’s impacts on health outcomes [12].

This is because health literacy capacities may be mediated by individuals’ education and socio-cultural behavioral background and because measurement tools for health literacy also vary [12]. In particular, the patriarchal family culture in Korea reduces the opportunity for male to access food information, that is, to search for information, compared to female. Middle-aged Korean male are less interested in purchasing groceries [13], and are still dependent on married middle-aged female for meal preparation [13, 14]. Therefore, there is inevitably a difference in health literacy related to food information according to sex. In a previous study, health literacy, which measured the ability to use food nutrition labels, was found to differ by sex, educational level, and age but was not associated with health behavior [15]. As such, there is a gap in the knowledge from studies in which health literacy and health behaviors affect IFG.

To address this gap, this study compares how the general characteristics of IFG and non-IFG differ and how health behaviors and health literacy differ using population data. Moreover, considering Korea's sex meal preparation culture, factors affecting IFG were analyzed by sex.

Methods

Study Design

The present study is an observational study with a cross-sectional study based on data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) that was conducted to compare the differences of demographics, health behaviors, and health literacy between individuals with IFG and non-IFG. Furthermore, considering the cultural characteristics of Korea, IFG related factors according to sex were identified.

Data Source and Participants

This investigation utilizes the Korean Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) data, which is a survey conducted by the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Korea Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (KCDC). The KNHANES evaluates the health and nutrition status of Koreans, monitors trends in health risk factors and major chronic diseases, and provides data for the development and evaluation of Koreans health policies and programs. This survey used a stratified, multistage probability sampling design to select housing units. This included stratifying by region in the first stage and layering by sex and age in the second stage. To represent the entire Korean adult population and account for the complex sampling procedure, sampling weights were used. The weighted sample for the KNHANES reflected the sampling fraction and nonresponse bias adjustments.

In total, data from 24,269 people who participated in the KNHANES VII (2016–2018) were analyzed to determine whether the inclusion criteria were met. Data that met the exclusion criteria, such as those under 29 or over 65 years and diagnosed with type I or II diabetes, were then removed (excluded data n=14,350). The KNHANES survey comprised the following: The Health Interview Survey, Health Behavior Survey, Nutrition Survey, and Health Examination Survey, and this study’s variables were collected from these four surveys.

Assessment of Measurements

The KNHANES VII (2016–2018) was used to obtain information on demographic characteristics, hematologic examinations, health behaviors, and health literacy (i.e., recognition of nutrition fact labels and utilization of the nutrition fact labels).

Demographic characteristics

Sex, age, economic status (low, middle, high), education level (≤ middle school, ≥high school), employed status (yes or no), duty type (day, shift), perceived health status (good, bad), body mass index (< 23 kg/m2 or ≥ 23 kg/m2), and perceived stress (never feel, feel a little, feel much) were used to assess socioeconomic status.

Economic status was based on the average monthly household income. Household income was partially adjusted by sex and age based on monthly equivalent income (= monthly household income/ number of families). Education level was categorized based on graduation status, such that completion, withdrawal, enrollment, and leave of absence were categorized with the preceding academic background.

Citizens in the Republic of Korea receive mandatory education through middle school in accordance with Article 31 of the Constitution. Therefore, the education status was categorized based on whether each participant was a middle school graduate or had received more than compulsory education.

For employed status, participants were asked “Have you worked for more than an hour in the last week for income? Or have you worked for your family for more than 18 hours unpaid? If you were originally working but are on a temporary leave of absence, this is considered work.” For duty type, people who answered “yes” in response to “Do you work from 6 am to 6 pm?” were classified as day type, and people who answered “yes” in response to “Or do you work during a different time period?” were classified as shift type.

The question regarding perceived health status asked, “What do you usually think about your health?” and the result was categorized into good or bad. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using measured height and obesity. In this study, participants with a BMI of less than 18.5 kg/m2 were categorized as underweight, those with a BMI of 18.5–22.9 kg/m2 were categorized as normal weight, and those with a BMI of at least 23.0 kg/m2 were categorized as overweight [16]. Participants were considered as not overweight or overweight based on whether their BMI was < 23 kg/m2 or ≥ 23 kg/m2, respectively.

Health behaviors

Dining out was classified as less than once a month, less than twice a week, 3 to 4 times a week, or every day. Participants’ alcohol consumption during the recent year was categorized as not at all, less than once a week, and more than two times a week. For smoking, “Smoking every day” and “Smoking occasionally” were classified as “yes,” and “I smoked in the past, but not now” was classified as “no.”

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) [17] recommends that people with prediabetes and IFG walk for at least 150 minutes a week. Weekly walking time was categorized as less than 150 minutes or more than 150 minutes a week. Weekly aerobic activity equivalent to medium-intensity physical activity for over 2 hours and 30 minutes or high-intensity physical activity for over 1 hour and 15 minutes or a mixture of medium- and high-intensity physical activity (high intensity for one minute or medium intensity for two minutes) was classified as “yes” or “no.”

Total sitting time per day was calculated based on the usual sitting time during the week, and was categorized into sitting less than four hours a day or sitting for more than four hours a day.

Health literacy. Health literacy was measured by two questions. Participants responded to questions regarding the recognition of nutrition fact labels and utilization of nutrition fact labels with “yes” or “no.” The outcome variable, “the presence of IFG” was assessed through responses to questions regarding whether participants have fasted for 8 hours without diabetes and have a fasting glucose level greater than 100 mg/dl but less than 126 mg/dl [1].

Statistical Analysis

To increase the sensitivity of this study and reduce hidden biases such as sampling bias, complex samples analysis procedures were implemented in consideration of sampling weights, stratification variables, and cluster including two or more survey districts by city/state/house type variables using the IBM SPSS 25.0 program. Through the process of applying these weights, the sampling bias was reduced. Missing data were statistically excluded. First, data from the selected sample were analyzed for individuals with non-IFG and IFG. Chi-square tests were conducted to compare the percentage of all variables for individuals with non-IFG and IFG. For the logistic regression analysis of the main outcomes, Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to test for normality, and the normality assumption was satisfied with p-value > .05. To get the evidence for collinearity among the independent variables, whether Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was is greater than 10. As results, there were not found s evidence for collinearity. That is, there were no variables greater than 10. The chi-square statistic was computed comparing the observed frequencies with those expected under the linear model using the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. A non-significant chi-square found in this study (x2= 10.40, p > .05), indicating that the data fit the model well.

In the next step, the logistic regression model was conducted using variables with significant results in the univariate analysis to investigate the association between variables that were statistically significant at less than 0.05. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression was stratified into female and male.

Results

Demographic Characteristics and IFG

The demographic characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants (N=9919)

Among the 9919 participants, 7093 (71.0 %; 95% CI:69.8–72.2) were in the normal fasting glucose group and 2826 (29.0 %; 95% CI:27.8–30.2) were in the IFG group.

The mean age of the participants was 45.3 ± 0.2 years old. Of the total, 36.8% of participants were male, and 30.6% were 40–49 years old. Additionally, 80.5% of the participants had at least a high school education in the IFG group. The mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants was 23.8 ± 0.04 (kg/m2). The presence of IFG varied significantly by employed status (p < .001), duty type (p = .002), body mass index (p < .001), and perceived stress (p = .002).

Health Behaviors and IFG

In the IFG group, 2296 (96.6%) dined out more than twice a week, while 6014 (97.6%) of the non-IFG group dined out twice a week or more. Regarding drinking behaviors, 36.4% of the IFG group drank alcohol, while 23.0% of the non-IFG frequently drank alcohol. There were also significant differences between the two groups in their current smoking status (p = .009). In the IFG group, 767 (51.7%) did not currently smoke, and in the non-IFG group, 1032 (53.2%) were currently smokers. For other health behaviors, the mean walking time per week of the non-IFG group was 237.9 ± 4.7 minutes, and the total time sitting per day was 495.9 ± 5. minutes. In IFG group, the mean walking time per week was 233.6 ± 5.7 minutes, and the total time sitting per day was 476.0 ± 5.1 minutes. Walking time per week (p = .451), practice of aerobic activity (p = .416), and total time sitting per day (p = .905) were not significantly different between the groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Health behaviors of participants (N=9919)

Health Literacy and IFG

Significant differences were observed between the two groups in health literacy such as in the recognition and utilization of nutrition fact labels. The percentages of people who recognized nutrition fact labels were 87.4% in the non-IFG group and 81.8% in the IFG group, which shows a significant difference (p < .001). Regarding utilization of nutrition facts labels, 2,180 (38.9%) such participants were in the non-IFG group and 594 (30.5%) were in the IFG group (p < .001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Health literacy of participants (N=9919)

Factors Associated with IFG

Table 4 presents the OR and 95% CI for predictors of IFG.

Table 4 Odds ratios for IFG (N=9919)

In univariate analysis, sex, age, duty type, BMI, and drinking in the past year were found to be factors related to IFG. Male were 1.66 times more likely to have IFG than female. Those in their 50s were 2.41 times more likely to have IFG than were those in their 30s.

In multivariate analysis by sex, the predictors of IFG in female were low (OR = 4.18, 95% CI 1.57–11.15) and middle (OR = 2.78, 95% CI 1.19–6.49) economic status and having an obese-level BMI (OR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.29–4.28). While age (40s OR = 1.72, 95% CI 1.34–2.20; 50s OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.79–3.13; 60s OR = 2.04, 95% CI 1.42–2.93), frequent dining out (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.85), frequent drinking (OR = 1.83, 1.23–2.72), and not using nutrition fact labels (OR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.05–1.75) were associated with IFG in male.

Discussion

This study found that the prevalence of IFG was 29% and that predictors of IFG differed by sex. The prevalence of IFG 29% was lower than in Taiwan 35.8% [17], China 33.3% [17], and Western countries 29.2%–37.4% [18], but it has increased by 5% compared to 15 years ago [19]. This is consistent with the continued increase in diabetes prevalence from 11.1% in 2012 to 15.9% in 2018 [20]. Although this prevalence is lower than in other countries, personal efforts and political attention is important because it has gradually risen from 23% in 2006.

The predictors of IFG were similar to those found in previous studies. As is already known, being male, older, and obese, as well as engaging in poor health behaviors such as drinking and smoking, were also associated with IFG in this study [18]. Moreover, health literacy was significantly different between the non-IFG group and IFG group, but univariate analysis did not show health literacy as a predictor. The cause can be found from a previous report showing that male with IFG have a lower health literacy and poorer health behaviors than do female [19]. Therefore, the factors affecting IFG were analyzed by dividing male and female in this study, and meaningful results were obtained.

In male, drinking was a predictor of IFG. Many countries report that male drink more frequently and drink more than female [20], and Korean male also have higher drinking levels than Korean female [21]. Studies have reported that there was a strong association between male with IFG and risk factors for drinking, smoking, and obesity [22]; thus, active management may be needed. More than 79% of participants with IFG were employed. Korean male office workers have various health problems such as diabetes mellitus due to a lack of exercise, poor eating habits, and drinking and smoking [23, 24]. Although the legal working hours per week in South Korea were shortened with the introduction of the 5-day workweek system in 2004, South Korea continues to have the longest work hours in the world [25]. A substantial number of Korean office workers experience a lack of exercise due to their overtime work [23, 25] and they experience many drinking problems due to the get-together culture and public drinking [26]. Health professionals should focus on education and counseling on risk factors for IFG in male workers, emphasize the importance of healthy lifestyles. However, our results did not show a significant association between employment and IFG. In previous studies, the drinking behaviors of Korean male based on employment status were different [26]. Results of this study suggest that it is necessary to classify occupational groups and analyze them. In addition, with regard to smoking, our findings showed that male with IFG had a lower smoking rate than male without IFG. However, since smoking is reported as a risk factor for diabetes [22, 27], an in-depth study on this is needed in the future.

The results of this study indicate that the proportion of individuals with IFG who were actually using food and nutrition information was lower than that of individuals with non-IFG. Male with IFG had lower health literacy than did female with IFG. A number of European countries have reported that low education, old age, and financial scarcity are commonly associated with low health literacy [28, 29]. However, information on the relationship between sex and health literacy is still lacking, and the results of health literacy according to sex suggest otherwise [30, 31]. Individuals with IFG need health and food information they can understand and use in order to maintain target blood glucose levels and properly manage their health [32]. However, Koreans have a low understanding of food information and a low level of practice in using information for food selection [30]. In particular, middle-aged Korean male are less interested in food purchases [13], and married middle-aged female still take on the main responsibility for preparing meals at home and as food purchasers [13, 14]. Even in other Western countries, female still have more household responsibilities [33] and are much more likely to cook [34]. Middle-aged adult male in Korea depend on female for meal preparation, and it is expected that this patriarchal family culture will show differences in food consumption behavior, which is expected to affect health literacy. However, further research on health literacy is needed in the future.

Fasting blood glucose levels and obesity are affected by balanced caloric intake rather than daily caloric intake [35]. In addition, the outcome of body mass index (BMI) control through dietary intake and physical activity affects IFG [5]; thus, it is important to choose a balanced diet. Western countries are using strategies to improve individuals’ health literacy for managing their blood glucose and utilizing nutritional information on various foods [36, 37]. However, in South Korea, there is still a lack of understanding of food information and systems that can be properly utilized in everyday life [38]. In several countries where there is a high illiteracy rate, low health literacy can be understood as an inability to read or understand essential health-related data, and thus, to manage health [19]. However, the illiteracy rate is low in South Korea because of the high level of education; more than 80% of the participants in this study had an educational background of 10th grade or higher. The low level of health literacy compared to the high level of literacy can be interpreted as a lack of health education and public relations in terms of health. Low health literacy may be affected by a lack of personal competencies to use information as well as health literacy-related demands and complexity. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of developing educational programs or strategies to improve individuals' health literacy [28], and there is a need in South Korea for strategies to increase accessibility to health information through the development and provision of effective health information media for adults with IFG. Therefore, strategies considering sex and age are expected to reduce the prevalence of diabetes in individuals with IFG.

In this study, 76.1% of participants with IFG were found to be obese (BMI ≥ 23kg/m2). Since there was a very high correlation between an increase in BMI and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and IFG [5], exercise and healthy eating habits for BMI control are considered important. However, our study found that “walking for 150 minutes or more per week” did not have a significant effect on IFG prevalence. It was also found that about 50% of all participants “walked for 150 minutes or more a week,” indicating that about half of Korean adults have a considerable lack of activity. Studies have reported that the prevalence of IFG increased with a lack of exercise [19, 39]. Therefore, further studies are needed to understand basic metabolism in individuals with IFG, and consider the intensity and degree of exercise that affects the consequences of obesity and BMI.

This study has several limitations. First, since the participants were examined based on responses to a multidimensional questionnaire at a single time point, this study could not analyze in detail the causal relationship between health literacy and health behavior factors affecting IFG. Second, we evaluated health literacy using two items (i.e., “recognition of nutrition fact labels” and “utilization of the nutrition facts labels”). Since an exact measurement of health literacy levels was not used, the relationship between health literacy level and health behavior in those with IFG could not be closely evaluated. Further studies using more detailed surveys are suggested to verify the results of this study.

Despite these potential limitations, our study has several strengths. This study used national statistical data that covered three years, and the participants represented the total adult population in South Korea. The survey design included multi-level sampling, stratification, and clustering. Therefore, the results of this study can be generalized to the adult population of South Korea. In addition, the results confirmed the differences in health behavior and health literacy in the sex of Korean individuals with IFG and those with non-IFG. Particularly, male with IFG have a poor tendency to use health literacy to ensure the practice of health behaviors, such as engaging in exercise, avoiding alcohol, managing obesity, and utilizing food information in this study. Because health literacy is related to health status [40], national policies and support should be focused on mitigating the impacts of low health literacy in male with IFG. Above all, it is important for male with IFG to be aware of the importance of health literacy, so that they can practice effective health behaviors.

Conclusion

This study found that the prevalence of IFG and factors associated with IFG differed by sex. The predictors of IFG in male were old age, shift work, drinking behavior, frequently dining out, and lower health literacy, while low economic status and obese-level BMI were the IFG predictors in female. To promote health behaviors in individual with IFG, tailored strategies should provide educational interventions for improving health literacy to those with IFG.

Availability of data and materials

Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data are available at (https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/main.do) publicly. Entire data from KNHANES are coded and available freely.

Abbreviations

KNHANES:

Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

KCDC:

Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

IFG:

Impaired fasting glycemia

References

  1. 1.

    Association AD. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019. Diabetes care. 2019;42(Supplement 1):S13–28. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-S002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Nichols GA, Hillier TA, Brown JB. Progression from newly acquired impaired fasting glucose to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(2):228–33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc06-1392.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Jager A, Hienkens E, Kostense PJ, Stehouwer CD, et al. Relation of impaired fasting and postload glucose with incident type 2 diabetes in a Dutch population: The Hoorn Study. Jama. 2001;285(16):2109–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.16.2109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, et al. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. New England J Med. 2001;344(18):1343–50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Soo-Hee J. The Relation of Impaired Fasting Glucose and HDL-Cholesterol by Gnder and Body Mass Index. J Health Inform Stat. 2019;44(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.21032/jhis.2019.44.1.8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Moon S. Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors in Korean people with metabolic syndrome. Journal of community health nursing. 2017;34(2):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370016.2017.1304145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Suppl 1):S13–27. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-S002.

  8. 8.

    Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century.. Health Prom Int. 2000;15(3):259-267 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

  9. 9.

    Fransen MP, von Wagner C, Essink-Bot M-L. Diabetes self-management in patients with low health literacy: ordering findings from literature in a health literacy framework. Patient Educ Counseling. 2012;88(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Baker DW, Wolf MS, Feinglass J, Thompson JA, Gazmararian JA, Huang J. Health literacy and mortality among elderly persons. Arch Int Med. 2007;167(14):1503–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.14.1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sudore RL, Mehta KM, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, Newman AB, Satterfield S et al. Limited literacy in older people and disparities in health and healthcare access. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2006;54(5):770-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00691.x

  12. 12.

    Caruso R, Magon A, Baroni I, Dellafiore F, Arrigoni C, Pittella F, et al. Health literacy in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Acta Diabetologica. 2018;55(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-0171-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee SH. A Study on the Market Segmentation of Food consumption Behavior by Food Related Lifestyle. J Table Food Coordinate. 2021;16(1):61–80. https://doi.org/10.26433/TFCK.2021.16.1.61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chung LN, Yang IS, Lee HY. Preference, satisfaction, and repurchase intention of consumers for home meal replacements (HMR) by product categories. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2007;23(3):388–400.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bowen ME, Cavanaugh KL, Wolff K, Davis D, Gregory B, Rothman RL. Numeracy and dietary intake in patients with type 2 diabetes. The Diabetes Educator. 2013;39(2):240–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/014572713475841.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Korean Society for the Study of Obesity. Available from: http://general.kosso.or.kr/html/?pmode=obesityDiagnosis

  17. 17.

    American Diabetes Association. Abridged for primary care providers: standards of medical care in diabetes—2016. Clin Diabetes. 2016;34(Supplement 1):S3–S21. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.34.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chen CM, Yeh MC. The prevalence and determinants of impaired fasting glucose in the population of Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1271-2458-13-1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Luo H, Chen Z, Bell R, Rafferty AP, Gaskins Little NR, Winterbauer N, et al. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Public Health Reports. 2016;2020:0033354920927848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920927848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chaiyasong S, Huckle T, Mackintosh AM, Meier P, Parry CD, Callinan S, et al. Drinking patterns vary by gender, age and country-level income: Cross-country analysis of the International Alcohol Control Study. Drug and alcohol review. 2018;37:S53–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12820.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim YH, Shon CW. Determinants analysis on alcohol consumption behaviors focused on age effects among Korean men. Korean Public Health Res. 2018;44(1):31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Siddiqui S, Zainal H, Harun SN, Ghadzi SMS, Ghafoor S. Gender differences in the modifiable risk factors associated with the presence of prediabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome. Clin Res Rev. 2020;14(5):1243–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee JH, Hwang SY, Kim EJ, Kim MJ. Comparison of risk factors between prehypertension and hypertension in Korean male industrial workers. Public Health Nursing. 2006;23(4):314–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00567.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim HJ, Hong JI, Mok HJ, Lee KM. Effect of workplace-visiting nutrition education on anthropometric and clinical measures in male workers. Clinical nutrition research. 2012;1(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2012.1.1.49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Employment Outlook 2018. Web site: www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/korea-2018-OECD-economic-survey-overview-Korean.pdf

  26. 26.

    Gu-Young K. Factors influencing drinking of employees: Focus on the white collar employess. Korean J Social Welf. 2005;57(2):93–118 Available from: http://www.dbpia.co.kr/pdf/pdfView.do?nodeId=NODE07238592.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yeh HC, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Smoking, smoking cessation, and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Annals Int Med. 2010;152(1):10–7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-201001050-00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Young-Bing L, Liu L, Yan-Fei L, Yan-Li C. Relationship between health literacy, health-related behaviors and health status: A survey of elderly Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):9714–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120809714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sørensen K, Pelikan JM, Röthlin F, Ganahl K, Slonska Z, Doyle G, et al. Health literacy in Europe: comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). Europ J Public Health. 2015;25(6):1053–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Milner A, Shields M, Scovelle AJ, Sutherland G, King TL. Health literacy in male-dominated occupations. Am J Men’s Health. 2020;14(5):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320954022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pepetone A, Vanderlee L, White CM, Hammond D, Kirkpatrick SI. Food insecurity, food skills, health literacy and food preparation activities among young Canadian adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Public Health Nutri. 2021;24(9):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021000719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kim S, Oh J, Yunmi L. Health literacy: an evolutionary concept analysis. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing. Education. 2013;19(4):558–70. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.4.558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Little J, Ilbery B, Watts D. Gender, consumption and the relocalisation of food: A research agenda. Sociologia Ruralis. 2009;49(3):201–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00492.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Taillie LS. Who’s cooking? Trends in US home food preparation by gender, education, and race/ethnicity from 2003 to 2016. Nutri J. 2018;17(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-018-0347-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Onuoha NO, Okafor AM, Eme PE, Onyia UD. Anthropometric status, fasting blood sugar, nutrient intake and energy balance of traders in a market population in Nsukka, Nigeria. Age (years). 2016;18(28):166. https://doi.org/10.15761/IFNM.1000168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rothman RL, DeWalt DA, Malone R, Bryant B, Shintani A, Crigler B, et al. Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care–based diabetes disease management program. Jama. 2004;292(14):1711–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.14.1711.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Restrepo A, White MJ, Borg A, Olendzki B, et al. Randomized trial of a literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored diabetes self-management intervention for low-income Latinos: Latinos en Control. Diabetes care. 2011;34(4):838–44. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-1981.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lee J-S. Awareness, Satisfaction, and Usage Patterns of Female-Consumers for Food-Nutrition Labeling in Busan. J Korean Dietetic Assoc. 2018;24(4):312–29. https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2018.24.4.312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zand A, Ibrahim K, Patham B. Prediabetes: Why should we care? Methodist DeBakey Cardiovasc J 2018;14(4):289. 10.14797/mdcj-14-4-289

  40. 40.

    Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Annals of internal medicine. 2011;155(2):97–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea, Grant/Award Number: 2019R1A2C1006016. Funding for the article processing charges was provided by NRFK (National Research Foundation of Korea).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS designed and supervised the study as a PI. HL reviewed and evaluated the included literature. BK analyzed the data and all authors contributed to draft the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bohyun Kim or Youngshin Song.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The KNHANES 7th were managed by the Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC) and approved by the KCDC Institutional Review Board (7th 2016 :2018-01-03-P-A and according to the Bioethics Law). All participants voluntarily participated and gave a written informed consent prior to participating the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Kim, B. & Song, Y. Related Factors for Impaired Fasting Glucose in Korean Adults: A Population Based Study. BMC Public Health 21, 2256 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12276-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12276-5

Keywords

  • Impaired fasting glucose
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Health behavior
  • Health Literacy