Skip to main content

Health disparities of critically ill children according to poverty: the Korean population-based retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

There is a lack of nationwide studies on critically ill patients’ health disparity under the National Health Insurance (NHI) system. We evaluated health disparities in intensive care unit (ICU) admission, outcomes, and readmission in impoverished children.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a national database from the Korean NHI and Medical Aid Program (MAP). MAP supports the population whose household income is lower than 40% of the median Korean household income. We defined poverty as being a MAP beneficiary and compared the poverty and non-poverty groups. Patients between 28 days and 18 years old who were admitted to the ICU were included. Hospital mortality and readmission were analyzed with adjustment for patient characteristics, hospital type, and management procedures.

Results

Out of 17,893 patients, 1153 (6.4%) patients were in poverty. The age-standardized ICU admission rate was higher in the poverty group (126.9 vs. 80.2 per 100,000 person-years). There was more age-standardized mortality in the poverty group (11.8 vs. 4.3 per 100,000 person-years). Patients in the poverty group did not have a statistically different risk of adjusted in-hospital mortality to those in the non-poverty group (odds ratio: 1.15, confidence interval [CI]: 0.84–1.55) but had a higher readmission rate (hazard ratio 1.25, CI 1.09–1.42).

Conclusion

Under the NHI system, the disparity in pediatric critical care outcomes according to poverty is not definite, but the healthcare disparity in pre- and post-hospital care is a concern. Further studies are required to improve pre- and post-hospital healthcare quality of impoverished children.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Critically ill children admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) range from 75 to 166 per 100,000 children-year and respiratory disease, infectious disease, congenital disease, and perioperative care are common causes of admission [1,2,3,4]. ICU admission is costly and limited because of the high requirement for medical resources [5,6,7]. In developing countries, a shortage of ICU infrastructure is the main barrier to ICU admission [6, 8]. In developed countries, individual economic barriers, such as lack of health insurance, could be a problem in accessing critical care services [9, 10]. Variable types of national health insurance (NHI) systems are aiming to lower the economic barriers to healthcare access [11]. However, nationwide epidemiologic data about access to critical care services and quality of critical care under the NHI system are not well known in relation to poverty status.

Poverty could be associated with lower access to ICU admission or procedures because of its cost or geographic accessibility [12]. Decreased use of standard procedures for critically ill patients could increase mortality in impoverished patients [9]. Insufficient post-ICU care service is associated with a high readmission rate since many ICU survivors discharge with sequelae [13, 14]. Studies have shown health disparities in impoverished children, focused on a few specific critical conditions [15,16,17,18]. However, standard critical care for children aged between 1 month and 18 years is delivered in the pediatric ICUs by pediatric critical care specialists.

Therefore, comprehensive pediatric ICU data on poverty is required to make policies and to decrease health disparities. Our study aims to evaluate differences in (1) the incidence of ICU admission, (2) ICU management outcomes, and (3) readmission rates after ICU discharge between those who were in poverty and those who were not.

Methods

Study population and design

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the national database from Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA), a central office in the Korean Ministry of Health. Korea has a single-payer national health system. The Korean NHI covers approximately 97% of Koreans, and the remaining 3% of Koreans who cannot afford national insurance are covered by the Medical Aid Program (MAP) [19]. MAP is a public assistance program to protect socially disadvantaged or low-income family whose household income is lower than 40% of the median Korean household income (example: for 1-person family < 0.4 x $1302 = $521 per month and for 4-person family < 0.4 x $3519 = $1407 per month). In this study, we defined the poverty group as the MAP beneficiaries. The HIRA service reviews claims submitted for reimbursement to Korean NHI and MAP. Therefore, the HIRA database includes virtually all ICU admissions (including private hospitals) of all patients < 18 years of age in Korea between August 1, 2009, and September 30, 2014. We excluded patients younger than < 28 days of age because their healthcare delivery system (neonatal ICU) and insurance policies differed from those of older pediatric patients.

From this cohort, the analysis was restricted to subjects for whom information was available at 1 year before admission (wash-out period for new admission incidence) and 1 year after discharge (follow-up data for readmission). Therefore, we included pediatric admissions to an ICU between August 2010 and September 2013 (N = 17,927). Then we excluded patients who changed insurance status during ICU admission (n = 34) because their poverty exposure is ambiguous. The final sample size was 17,893 patients who were admitted between August 1, 2010, and September 30, 2013 (Additional file 1). The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (# 2019–07-114), and informed consent was waived because we only accessed de-identified administrative data that had been previously collected. Detailed information regarding this study can be found in a previous study [1].

Study variables

We identified ICU admissions using the claim codes that hospitals submit for cost claims for ICU management of in-hospital stays to HIRA (codes AJ100-AJ590900). We considered ICU stays during the same hospitalization as a single ICU admission. Similarly, we considered the claim codes of hospital stay separated by the same or less than 1 day as the same hospital admission. Diagnostic codes are based on the Korean Classification of Diseases 6th edition, which is the modified version of the International Classification of Diseases 10th revision adapted for use in the Korean health system [20].

Study outcome variables were in-hospital mortality, hospital readmission, readmission to the ICU, or emergency room visit within 3 months after discharge. In-hospital mortality was defined as death before discharge. Readmission was defined as an admission after hospital discharge separated by more than 1 day. To obtain readmission information, we linked study participants’ personal identification numbers to the 2010–2014 inpatient databases.

Confounding variables that could reflect the severity of disease or affect ICU admission were collected using the Korean NHI database and claim codes (Data on procedures, prescriptions, and demographic characteristics). Procedure claim codes were invasive mechanical ventilation (Korean NHI procedure codes M5857, M5858, M5860), transplantation (Q8040-Q8050, Q8140-Q8150, Q8080, Q8101-Q8103, and R3280), hemodialysis (O7020, O7062, O7051–7054), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (O1901-O1904). We collected vasopressor use data such as dobutamine, dopamine, epinephrine, and norepinephrine for more than 2 days, using Korean drug and anatomical therapeutic chemical codes (148201BIJ, 38900BIJ, 148701BIJ, 148702BIJ, 429500BIJ, 152601BIJ, and 203101BIJ) [21].

Hospitals were classified according to the number of hospital beds and the number of specialties as defined by the Korean Health Law [22]. A hospital is defined as a healthcare institution with more than 30 inpatient beds. A general hospital is a hospital with more than 100 beds and more than seven specialty departments. A tertiary hospital is a general hospital with more than 20 specialty departments that serves as a teaching hospital.

Statistical analysis

We obtained population estimates for each year of age, sex, and calendar year from the NHI Service based on our definition of poverty. All analyses were conducted separately for the poverty and non-poverty groups. We calculated age-standardized ICU admission rates and mortality by the direct method [23] using the standard Korean population from Korean Statistical Information Service [24]. Mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range were used to describe the distribution of continuous variables. We used the chi-square test and Student’s t-tests to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively.

We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare the risk of in-hospital mortality between the poverty and non-poverty groups. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the model. Since patient’ demographics, diagnostic character, and treatment requirements could affect disease severity and in-hospital mortality, we adjusted for age, gender, primary diagnosis, treatment requirements (vasopressor, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and mechanical ventilation). Furthermore, we used hospitals as a stratification factor in the logistic regression model because patients could be clustered by the hospital. To standardize age distribution, we also performed an age and sex-weighted logistic regression for in-hospital mortality using inverse probability of treatment weighting. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI for the cumulative incidence of readmission, readmission to the ICU, and emergency room (ER) visits associated with poverty after adjusting for demographic, diagnostic, and severity associated factors. We conducted subgroup analysis according to the use of mechanical ventilation to evaluate the poverty effect in subgroups with different mortality rates for possible effect modification [25]. In the subgroup analysis, the same logistic regression model was used except for adjustment of mechanical ventilation.

We considered a p-value < 0.05 to be significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS® Visual Analytics (SAS Institute Inc., USA) and STATA version 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

The mean (standard deviation) age of study patients was 7.3 (6.1) years, and 57.9% were male (p = 0.145). Among 17,893 patients, 1153 patients (6.4%) were in poverty (Table 1). From August 2010 to September 2013, the age-standardized ICU admission rate was 82.4 per 100,000 person-years (80.2 per 100,000 person-years in non-poverty patients vs. 126.9 per 100,000 person-years in poverty patients). Poverty patients had higher ICU hospitalization rates at all ages, and rates were especially high among younger patients (Fig. 1). Compared to non-poverty patients, those who were in poverty were older (7.1 vs. 10.9 years; p < 0.001) (Table 1). Patients in the poverty group were more likely to be admitted with injuries (22.9% vs. 17.8%), neoplasms (13.8% vs. 9.3%), neurologic diseases (10.7% vs. 9.1%), and infectious diseases (3.0% vs. 2.3%) than the non-poverty group. While 39.8 and 67.4% of ICU admissions occurred in tertiary hospitals among the poverty and non-poverty groups, respectively, and rates of mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use were higher in the non-poverty group than the poverty group (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of pediatric patients in intensive care units according to poverty status
Fig. 1
figure1

Age-standardized admission rate to intensive care units (left) and age-standardized mortality rate (right) according to poverty status by age

The overall in-hospital mortality was 5.1% (6.0% in poverty patients and 5.1% in non-poverty patients; p = 0.223). The overall mortality of the subgroup with mechanical ventilation was 10.8%, while that of the subgroup without mechanical ventilation was 0.9%. There were 4.5 age-standardized ICU deaths per 100,000 Koreans per year (4.3 deaths per 100,000 person-years in non-poverty patients vs. 11.8 deaths per 100,000 person-years in poverty patients; Fig. 1). Multivariable analysis showed that the two groups had a similar risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.84–1.55; p = 0.38; Table 2). In both subgroups with and without mechanical ventilation, the adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality was not statistically different between the poverty and non-poverty group. The results were similar in the inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (odds ratio for in-hospital mortality = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.83–1.51). We mention this in the Result section as follows. Among patients who survived (n = 17,360), those in the poverty group were more likely to be re-admitted (adjusted HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.09–1.42) and visit the ER (adjusted HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.06–1.62) within 3 months after discharge than those in the non-poverty group were (Table 3).

Table 2 In-hospital mortality of pediatric patients in intensive care units according to poverty status
Table 3 Post-ICU discharge outcomes according to poverty status (N = 17,360)

Discussion

In this representative population-based cohort, we showed that the age-standardized population-based ICU admission rate of children in poverty (income of their household < 0.4 x median household income of Korea) was 1.6 (126.9/80.2) times higher than that of children not in poverty. The age-standardized population-based mortality rate of children in poverty was 2.7 (11.8/4.3) times higher than that of children not in poverty. The adjusted in-hospital mortality of critically ill children admitted to the ICU was not different between the poverty and non-poverty groups.

The higher age-standardized population-based ICU admission in the poverty group was contrary to the concept that low income is associated with limited access to critical care services [9, 10]. Instead, our admission rate was similar to a study result from England and Wales (least deprived quintile of the population: 65/100,000 vs. most deprived quintile of the population: 124/100,000 per year) [3]. A high incidence of critical illness can cause a high ICU admission rate. Therefore our result might be driven by the poor pre-hospital health status of the poverty group. In previous studies, the severity of illness at ICU admission was higher in uninsured patients [9, 26], which implies worse health status at ICU admission. Poverty could affect pre-hospital health status in various ways. Mechanisms related to poor pre-hospital health status could be driven by individual characteristics (inadequate health behavior, lack of parental education, delayed presentation to primary care) or community origin (unhealthy environmental factors, low vaccination rate) [12, 27]. Difficulties in access to primary care and preventive health services may contribute to the increasing severity of illness and organ failure on hospital presentation [12]. Although the ICU admission rate of the poverty group was higher, we could not ensure that there is no disparity in ICU accessibility for a life-threatening condition. However, our study results imply that improvement of pre-hospital health status may have policy priority over lowering the barrier to ICU admission under the current NHI system.

In addition to ICU access rate, quality of ICU care represented as a mortality rate is an important health disparity issue. The high standardized mortality rate in the impoverished population highlights a critical public health problem (Fig. 1), which means a child in an impoverished family has a high risk of death. However, once children were admitted to ICU, the difference in mortality rates between the two groups was not significant when we adjusted for demographics, hospital factors, and management procedures. The result of the adjusted analysis was similar in the high mortality subgroup (mechanical ventilation) and low mortality subgroup (non-mechanical ventilation). These similar adjusted mortality rates between the two groups imply that there was no significant overall disparity in critical care quality according to poverty. Therefore, the high standardized mortality rate of the impoverished population might be driven by the high admission rate of the poverty group rather than from a high in-hospital mortality rate. However, we need to be cautious in saying there were no healthcare disparities in the ICU. The overall in-hospital mortality rate of children might be too low to identify a disparity compared to adult patients [1, 28]. Furthermore, healthcare disparities might exist in some subgroups of ICU patients.

One of the possible causes of healthcare disparity is the disparity in resource use [9]. The low use of mechanical ventilation (35.6% vs. 43.1) and vasopressor (12.3% vs. 15.8%) in the poverty group might raise suspicion of a passive attitude toward treating patients in poverty. However, the rates of mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use were different by age group in a previous study [1]. The age distribution of the poverty group was different from that of the overall population, possibly due to the different age distribution of parents under MAP from the general population. When we stratified age into 3 groups (infant, children, adolescent), there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of mechanical ventilation and vasopressors according to poverty status (Additional file 2). In addition, the incidence of other resource-heavy procedures such as transplantation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and hemodialysis was similar between the poverty and non-poverty groups in an NHI system (Table 1) (Additional file 2). These findings are contrary to the reported socioeconomic disparities in transplantation [29,30,31]. The difference might originate from the different health insurance systems.

Although medical resource use in ICU was not definitely different according to poverty, insufficient post-ICU care was another concern of healthcare disparity in impoverished patients. In our study, ER visits and readmission rates after ICU discharge were higher in impoverished patients. Previous studies reported that a low-socioeconomic state is associated with a high number of ER visits [32, 33]. .Low income is also associated with a high readmission rate [17, 34, 35]. It is possible that impoverished patients cannot visit outpatient clinics early phase of disease because of making money and visit the emergency room only after disease aggravation. Another possible mechanism is that frequent ER visits of the deprived population could be caused by their severe health state [36]. Although readmission rate and ER visits could be increased in severely ill patients, the poverty group of this study showed a higher risk of ER visits and readmission after severity adjustment. Therefore, we need to study the adequacy of post-ICU discharge clinics for impoverished patients.

There are some limitations to this study. First, this study was conducted in a single country where a National Healthcare Insurance system covers the impoverished with a MAP. Thus virtually no one is uninsured population. Our findings are more likely to apply to countries with a National Health Insurance system and may yield different results according to insurance status. Second, we could not use physiologic parameters or laboratory findings to evaluate the severity of illness. However, we adjusted for illness severity using the different mortality rates for the primary diagnosis, hospital factors, and treatment requirements, according to a previous study [1]. Third, we could not evaluate important demographic factors such as parent occupation and education, number of siblings, size of households as well as various barriers to ICU care. Forth, we included only new admission to ICU for comparison of mortality and readmission risk. Therefore our admission rates did not reflect the burden of multiple admissions (28.5% admissions in the poverty group vs. 22.5% admissions in the non-poverty group). However, the finding that the standardized ICU admission rate in the poverty group is higher than that of the non-poverty group did not change with the inclusion of readmissions.

Despite these limitations, we included all hospitals where pediatric patients are admitted to the ICU, except for rare possible administrative losses of insurance claims, which allowed us to calculate the population-based admission rate and mortality rate. Previous studies conducted at select hospitals were not free from selection bias of hospitals [16, 26, 37]. Utilization of high-volume or top-ranked (low mortality) hospitals differed according to poverty status [38, 39], and data from these renowned hospitals could bias admission rates of low-income patients.

Our findings also have implications for reducing disparities in mortality in patients living in poverty. The NHI system with a single-payer might work well to provide healthcare in the ICU to impoverished patients without disparity, but lowering economic barriers to hospital healthcare by the NHI might not be sufficient to reduce mortality of impoverished patients. Policies to improve the pre-hospital health status of patients in poverty are required to decrease ICU admission and population-based mortality.

Conclusion

Under the NHI system, the disparity in pediatric critical care outcomes according to poverty is not definite, but the healthcare disparity in pre- and post-hospital care is a concern. Further studies are required to improve pre- and post-hospital healthcare quality of impoverished children.

Availability of data and materials

The researchers can access on the intranet of Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service through the URL http://opendata.hira.or.kr/home.do after approval of the request. The researchers can request the same periods, terms and items (claim codes) as done in this study. The authors did not have any special access privileges that others would not have.

Abbreviations

ICU:

Intensive care unit

NHI:

National Health Insurance

MAP:

Medical Aid Program

HIRA:

Health Insurance Review and Assessment

CI:

Confidence interval

HR:

Hazard ratio

ER:

Emergency room

SES:

Socioeconomic status

References

  1. 1.

    Jung M, Park H, Kang D, Park J, Jeon K, Chung CR, et al. Age-specific distribution of diagnosis and outcomes of children admitted to ICUs: a population-based cohort study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;20(7):e301–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Naclerio AL, Gardner JW, Pollack MM. Socioeconomic factors and emergency pediatric ICU admissions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896(1):379–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08147.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Parslow RC, Tasker RC, Draper ES, Parry GJ, Jones S, Chater T, et al. Epidemiology of critically ill children in England and Wales: incidence, mortality, deprivation and ethnicity. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(3):210–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2007.134403.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tripathi S, Kaur H, Kashyap R, Dong Y, Gajic O, Murthy S. A survey on the resources and practices in pediatric critical care of resource-rich and resource-limited countries. J Intensive Care. 2015;3(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-015-0106-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Halpern NA, Pastores SM, Greenstein RJ. Critical care medicine in the United States 1985-2000: an analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(6):1254–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000128577.31689.4C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Losonczy LI, Barnes SL, Liu S, Williams SR, McCurdy MT, Lemos V, et al. Critical care capacity in Haiti: a nationwide cross-sectional survey. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218141. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218141.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fowler RA, Abdelmalik P, Wood G, Foster D, Gibney N, Bandrauk N, et al. Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study. Critical Care (London, England). 2015;19(1):133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fowler RA, Adhikari NK, Bhagwanjee S. Clinical review: critical care in the global context--disparities in burden of illness, access, and economics. Critical Care (London, England). 2008;12(5):225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lyon SM, Benson NM, Cooke CR, Iwashyna TJ, Ratcliffe SJ, Kahn JM. The effect of insurance status on mortality and procedural use in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(7):809–15. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201101-0089OC.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fowler RA, Noyahr LA, Thornton JD, Pinto R, Kahn JM, Adhikari NK, et al. An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: the association between health insurance status and access, care delivery, and outcomes for patients who are critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(9):1003–11. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200902-0281ST.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cuadrado C, Crispi F, Libuy M, Marchildon G, Cid C. National Health Insurance: A conceptual framework from conflicting typologies. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2019;123(7):621–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Soto GJ, Martin GS, Gong MN. Healthcare disparities in critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(12):2784–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a84a43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Griffiths JA, Barber VS, Cuthbertson BH, Young JD. A national survey of intensive care follow-up clinics. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(10):950–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04792.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jones S, Rantell K, Stevens K, Colwell B, Ratcliffe JR, Holland P, et al. Outcome at 6 months after admission for pediatric intensive care: a report of a national study of pediatric intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Pediatrics. 2006;118(5):2101–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    McFadden ER Jr. Acute severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(7):740–59. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200208-902SO.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cassidy LD, Lambropoulos D, Enters J, Gourlay D, Farahzad M, Lal DR. Health disparities analysis of critically ill pediatric trauma patients in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(2):233–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Slain KN, Shein SL, Stormorken AG, Broberg MCG, Rotta AT. Outcomes of children with critical bronchiolitis living in poor communities. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018;57(9):1027–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922817740666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yergan J, Flood AB, Diehr P, LoGerfo JP. Relationship between patient source of payment and the intensity of hospital services. Med Care. 1988;26(11):1111–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198811000-00009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Korean National Health Insurance Cooperation. Annual report of national health insurance statistics. Seoul: Korean National Health Insurance Cooperation; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee YS, Lee YR, Chae Y, Park SY, Oh IH, Jang BH. Translation of Korean medicine use to ICD-codes using National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:8160838.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Calvo-Ayala E, Khan BA, Farber MO, Ely EW, Boustani MA. Interventions to improve the physical function of ICU survivors: a systematic review. Chest. 2013;144(5):1469–80. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.13-0779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Anekwe DE, Biswas S, Bussières A, Spahija J. Early rehabilitation reduces the likelihood of developing intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2020;107:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Curtin LR, Klein RJ. Direct standardization (age-adjusted death rates). Healthy People. Stat Notes. 2000;1995(6):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2009;373(9678):1874–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jung M, Park H, Kang D, Park E, Jeon K, Chung CR, et al. The effect of bed-to-nurse ratio on hospital mortality of critically ill children on mechanical ventilation: a nationwide population-based study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00780-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lopez AM, Tilford JM, Anand KJ, Jo CH, Green JW, Aitken ME, et al. Variation in pediatric intensive care therapies and outcomes by race, gender, and insurance status. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(1):2–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCC.0000192319.55850.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Woolf SH, Braveman P. Where health disparities begin: the role of social and economic determinants--and why current policies may make matters worse. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2011;30(10):1852–9. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Park J, Jeon K, Chung CR, Yang JH, Cho YH, Cho J, et al. A nationwide analysis of intensive care unit admissions, 2009-2014 - the Korean ICU National Data (KIND) study. J Crit Care. 2018;44:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.09.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sarpel U, Suprun M, Sofianou A, Berger Y, Tedjasukmana A, Sekendiz Z, et al. Disentangling the effects of race and socioeconomic factors on liver transplantation rates for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Transpl. 2016;30(6):714–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chatelet V, Lobbedez T, Harambat J, Bayat-Makoei S, Glowacki F, Vigneau C. Socioeconomic inequalities and kidney transplantation. Nephrol Ther. 2018;14(2):81–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2017.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Crews DC, Liu Y, Boulware LE. Disparities in the burden, outcomes, and care of chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23(3):298–305. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mnh.0000444822.25991.f6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Scantlebury R, Rowlands G, Durbaba S, Schofield P, Sidhu K, Ashworth M. Socioeconomic deprivation and accident and emergency attendances: cross-sectional analysis of general practices in England. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(639):e649–54. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X686893.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tozer AP, Belanger P, Moore K, Caudle J. Socioeconomic status of emergency department users in Ontario, 2003 to 2009. CJEM. 2014;16(3):220–5. https://doi.org/10.2310/8000.2013.131048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shebehe J, Hansson A. High hospital readmission rates for patients aged >/=65 years associated with low socioeconomic status in a Swedish region: a cross-sectional study in primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36(3):300–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1499584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hu J, Gonsahn MD, Nerenz DR. Socioeconomic status and readmissions: evidence from an urban teaching hospital. Health Affairs (Project Hope). 2014;33(5):778–85. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Colineaux H, Le Querrec F, Pourcel L, Gallart JC, Azema O, Lang T, et al. Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned? Int J Public Health. 2018;63(3):397–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-017-1073-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee FA, Hervey AM, Sattarin A, Deeds A, Berg GM, Molik K. The impact of payer source on trauma outcomes in a pediatric population. Hosp Pediatr. 2017;7(3):171–6. https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2016-0123.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kim Y, Oh J, Jha A. Contribution of hospital mortality variations to socioeconomic disparities in in-hospital mortality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23(9):741–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bao Y, Kamble S. Geographical distribution of surgical capabilities and disparities in the use of high-volume providers: the case of coronary artery bypass graft. Med Care. 2009;47(7):794–802. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819a594d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No external funding was provided.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EP, HP, JC conceived the study idea. EP, HP, JC, GYS, KJ, CRC, JHY, JC2 and EG designed the study. JC2, HP, DK were responsible for collection of data. JC2, HP, DK and EG provided statistical expertise. EP and HP wrote the first draft of the manuscript. EG, JC2, and JC made critical revisions of the manuscript content. All the authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joongbum Cho.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the research ethics committee from Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) and informed consent was exempted because we only accessed de-identified previously collected data. The data could be accessed with the permission of the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organization that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Flow chart of patient selection with inclusion and exclusion

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Characteristics of pediatric patients in intensive care units according to poverty status by age groups.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, E., Park, H., Kang, D. et al. Health disparities of critically ill children according to poverty: the Korean population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 21, 1274 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11324-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Health disparity
  • Critical care
  • Poverty
  • Intensive care units
  • Mortality
  • Child
  • National health insurance
  • Patient admission
  • Patient readmission
  • Health status