Skip to main content
Download PDF

Suicide by pesticide ingestion in Nepal and the impact of pesticide regulation

BMC Public Health volume 21, Article number: 1136 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nepal recorded 5754 suicides in 2018–19 - a high number for a relatively small country. Over 24% of these suicides were by poisoning, most by ingestion of highly concentrated agricultural pesticides. Nepal has actively regulated pesticides to reduce their health impacts since 2001. We aimed to analyse Nepal’s history of pesticide regulation, pesticides responsible for poisonings, and relate them to national suicide rates.

Methods

Information on pesticide regulation was collected from the Plant Quarantine and Pesticide Management Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development. National data on suicides from 1980 to 2019 were obtained from the National Statistical Bureau and Nepal Police. Data on the pesticides responsible for self-poisoning and pesticide suicides over time were obtained from a systematic literature review.

Results

As of June 2020, 171 pesticides were registered for use in Nepal, of which one was extremely hazardous (WHO Class Ia), one other highly hazardous (WHO Class Ib), and 71 moderately hazardous (WHO Class II). Twenty-four pesticides have been banned since 2001, with eight (including five WHO Class I compounds) banned in 2019. Although the suicide rate has increased more than twelve-fold since 1980, particularly for hanging (15-fold increase from 1980 to 2018), fatal pesticide self-poisoning has increased by 13-fold. Methyl-parathion is reported to be the key pesticide responsible for pesticide self-poisoning in Nepal, despite being banned in 2006.

Conclusion

The full effect of the recent pesticide policy reform in Nepal remains to be seen. Our analysis shows a continuing increase in suicide numbers, despite bans of the most important pesticide in 2006. This may indicate smuggling across the border and the use of the brand name (Metacid) for pesticides in general making it difficult to identify the responsible pesticide. More information is required from forensic toxicology labs that identify the individual compounds found. The effect of recent bans of common suicide pesticides needs to be monitored over the coming years. Evidence from other Asian countries suggests that HHPs bans will lead to a marked reduction in suicides, as well as fewer cases of occupational poisoning.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Pesticide poisoning affects peoples’ lives and health, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where high proportions of the population are engaged in agriculture and use highly hazardous pesticides (HHPs [1, 2]) on a daily basis. There is a growing international acceptance that rapidly reducing and progressively eliminating exposure to toxic chemicals is essential for the protection of human rights, health, and lives, and for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [3, 4]. Both the World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) stress their commitment to pesticide risk reduction, including a progressive ban of HHPs [5].

HHPs have been responsible for an estimated 14 million premature deaths from pesticide suicide since the Green Revolution placed them into rural households completely unable to use or store them safely [6]. Data from Sri Lanka [7,8,9], Bangladesh [10], South Korea [11] and Kerala (India) [12] indicate that pesticide regulation to remove HHPs from agriculture results in marked reductions in pesticide suicides without apparent effect on agricultural yield. Means restriction works for highly lethal suicide methods, such as poisoning with HHPs, because it puts space and time between the person and means, allowing the suicide impulse to pass or selection of a less lethal means, increasing the chance of survival [13, 14].

Nepal is a South Asian LMIC with the population of 29 million that is heavily dependent on agriculture. According to the WHO, it has a high suicide rate of around 20/100,000 per year in 2012 [13]. Poisoning is a common cause of suicide [15,16,17], with pesticides the most important poison [18, 19]. Pesticides are commonly used in Nepalese agriculture; they are regulated by the Plant Quarantine and Pesticide Management Centre (PQPMC) within the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (Box 1).

There are no nationwide data on the incidence of acute pesticide poisoning or of the pesticides causing deaths in Nepal [16, 20]. The Ministry of Health and Population collects data on poisoning but groups all poisons and forms (intentional, accidental, or occupational) of poisoning together, limiting the possibility for analysis. The Nepal Police records the numbers of suicides by poisoning, but again does not distinguish the agent. The Government of Nepal’s Heath Management Information System (HMIS) does not include the detailed information on poisoning and suicides that would make comprehensive data collection possible. Record-keeping at hospitals is under-resourced, limiting its usefulness for analysis of the precise poisons involved in cases and deaths [20].

The aim of this work was to identify the pesticide regulation that has been performed in Nepal, to identify pesticides responsible for most poisonings, and to relate these to the incidence of poisoning suicides over the last 40 years in the country.

Text Box 1. Pesticide regulation in Nepal

Nepal passed its first Pesticide Act in 1991 [21]. The Pesticide Rules were approved in January 1993 and became operative with the Act on 16 July 1994. The Act regulates the import, manufacture, sales, distribution and use of pesticides within Nepal. It also established a Pesticide Committee composed of members from various ministries, the Pesticide Association of Nepal, scientists and consumer groups for the purpose of managing pesticide-related issues.

In 2015–2019, Nepal underwent an administrative and government reform, adopting a new Constitution in 2015, new Criminal and Civil Codes in 2017, and importantly a new Pesticide Management Act in 2019. The new Constitution changed the unitary administrative system to a federal system, with governance at federal, provincial, and municipal levels.

Pesticide management is delegated to the PQPMC of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD). It was set up as part of structural reforms in 2018 to strengthen the government’s commitment to pesticide management. It is responsible for federal pesticide management to oversee the implementation of the Pesticide Management Act including registration, re-registration, de-registration, and banning of pesticides as well as the coordination and administration of the Pesticide Management Committee. PQPMC is Nepal’s Designated National Authority for the Rotterdam Convention.

Nepal’s provinces obtained a mandate to engage with pesticide management with the new legislation, with creation of provincial Ministries for Land Management, Agriculture and Cooperative. Provinces can formulate their own Pesticide Committees and have powers to renew pesticide licenses. There are two bodies under each provincial Ministry responsible for pesticide management – Provincial Training Directorate and Provincial Agriculture Development Directorate (PADD). Each PADD has a number of Agriculture Knowledge Centres (AKCs) established in place of previous District Agriculture Development Offices. The AKCs are involved in knowledge sharing related to production of agricultural products, and in connecting researchers and farmers, and transferring technology by training.

According to the law, provincial powers include re-registration of pesticides (as opposed to registration, which is possible only on the federal level), registration of home-made botanical pesticides and promotion of bio-pesticide production in the country, as well as strengthening provisions for pesticide disposal. Provincial pesticide management committees can also issue licenses for distribution, storing, use and application of pesticides. The new provincial mandate is still under development.

In 2016, Nepal also developed a voluntary Code of Practice for Using Pesticides – a non-binding document based on the FAO’s International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management [22]. The Code of Practice provides practical guidance to public and private sector organisations involved in the pesticide life-cycle, from production (manufacture and formulation) to disposal. It aims to minimize adverse health and environmental effects as well as human and animal exposure. It is intended to serve as a guiding framework for strengthening the capacity of stakeholders to regulate, evaluate, and enforce effective control over pesticides.

Methods

Nepal’s data on pesticide registration, use, and bans were obtained from the PQPMC website and from PQPMC officials. Suicide data were extracted from the Police and National Statistical Bureau reports for the years 1980 to 2019. The methods used in recording suicides are classified into seven categories: hanging, poisoning, weapon and instruments, drowning, burning, jumping, and electric current. The poisoning classification includes poisoning with substances other than pesticides (i.e. drugs and medicines). We used the World Bank data on the population of Nepal for each year from 1980 to 2019 as the denominator to calculate crude suicide rates.

We reviewed the literature for all papers reporting pesticide poisoning in Nepal from 1980 to 2019. We hand-searched Nepalese language and national journals for studies. We systematically searched PubMed and www.google.com for studies on pesticide and poisoning in Nepal using the search terms “Nepal” and “poisoning”. We selected English language papers reporting primary studies with the aim to identify the compounds responsible for pesticide poisoning. There were no publication date restrictions. We reviewed the first 150 hits found on www.google.com until no new studies were revealed compared to the PubMed search.

Statistical analysis

Simple descriptive statistics were used to describe the data.

Results

Pesticides

Nepal uses relatively little pesticide compared to other countries. According to the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, the country uses 0.396 active ingredient (a.i.) kg of pesticide per hectare of land, in comparison to 0.481 a.i. kg/ha in India and 1.9 kg/ha in Europe [23]. However, pesticide imports are increasing (from 56 metric tons in 1997–8 to 809 tons in 2018–19, Fig. 1). Gross sales and values account for US $7.5 million per year. These values do not take into account smuggling of pesticides across the border from India [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

National trends of pesticide imports. (Source: Plant Quarantine and Pesticide Management Centre, data available from authors upon request)

Full size image

There are currently 171 pesticides registered in the country. According to the WHO hazard classification [24], one (0.6%) is extremely hazardous (WHO class Ia), one (0.6%) highly hazardous (WHO class Ib), 73 (42.44%) moderately hazardous (WHO class II), 28 (16.27%) slightly hazardous (WHO class III), and 68 unlikely to present acute hazard (WHO class U) (Table 1).

Table 1 Classification of registered pesticides by WHO toxicity category
Full size table

Twenty-four pesticides have been banned in Nepal, the majority are persistent organic pollutant (POP) organochlorine compounds that were banned in 2001 and 2019 following adoption of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Table 2). Ten of the banned pesticides are obsolete and not used in agriculture and public health. In 2006, methyl parathion and monocrotophos were banned; two other acutely toxic HHPs (endosulfan and phorate) were banned in 2012 and 2015.

Table 2 Pesticides banned in Nepal
Full size table

In 2019, the Pesticide Registration Board banned eight pesticides including the high concentration (56%) 3 g tablet form of aluminum phosphide as well as several pesticides important for suicide in South Asia (carbofuran, carbosulfan, dichlorvos, and triazophos) (Table 2). Import and production was banned from August 4th, 2019. During the following two years, stockpiles in the country (Table 3) can be sold to farmers; after the two-year phase out period, all remaining stockpiles will need to be deposited in a government-built warehouse.

Table 3 Reported Nepalese stockpiles of recently banned pesticides (December 2019)
Full size table

Suicides

Suicidal deaths reported to the police have been increasing steadily in the past years (Fig. 2). In 2018–2019, 5754 deaths were reported, compared to 5317 in 2017–2018 and 5124 in 2016–2017 [25]. The calculated annual crude suicide rate in 2018–2019 was 20.7/100,000. The number of suicides in 1980 was recorded as 247. The rate of suicide increased from 1.64/100,000 in 1980 to 20.72/100,000 in 2018–19 (1163% increase).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Suicide numbers in Nepal 1980–2019. (Source: Nepal police, data available from the authors upon request)

Full size image

According to the police data, the most common method of suicide was hanging (4312, 74.1%) in 2018–19. Suicide by poisoning (n = 1320) accounted for 22.9% of suicides in the same period [25]. Between 1980 and 2019, hanging and poisoning accounted for 51,749 (66.1%) and 22,153 (28.3%) of all suicide deaths respectively. Hanging accounted for the majority of the increase in suicide rate, increasing from 155 in 1980 (1.03/100,000) to 4312 in 2018–19 (15.35/100,000) (1390% increase, Fig. 2). The rate of increase in poisoning suicides was less, from 55 in 1980 (0.37/100,000) to 1320 in 2018–19 (4.7/100,000) (1170% increase in rate), with most of the increase occurring in 1995–2003, and in 2008–12. Poisoning suicide numbers have been stable over the last 8 years, while hanging has increased greatly.

Pesticides involved in suicides

Our search identified 50 relevant publications ([17, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74]) (Fig. 3 and Table 4). Studies were published between 1990 and 2020. Most were hospital-based studies published in Nepalese academic journals. The number of poisoned patients in each publication ranged from 37 [26] to 2621 [37].

Fig. 3
figure 3

PRISMA Flow diagram

Full size image
Table 4 Pesticides identified in case series of pesticide self-poisoning in Nepal 1980–2019
Full size table

All the papers reported Organophosphorus (OP) insecticides to be responsible for most poisonings, ranging from 39.6% [58] to 65.0% of all poisonings [30], but most did not report the exact pesticides used. The second most common poisoning was with aluminium or zinc phosphide (10.7 to 26.1%). Few cases of poisoning and very few fatal cases in these papers were due to non-pesticide poisons. From 87 to 97% of poisoning patients in each publication was due to intentional poisoning. Mortality varied between 3 and 18.7%.

Among the studies that determined the OP pesticide used, methyl parathion and dichlorvos were the most common in all studies reviewed (Table 4). Depending on the study, methyl parathion (Metacid) accounted for 12.9% (2005–2011) [74], 17.5% (2004) [68], 52% (2012) [73] and 65–68% (2003–2005 and 2016–2018) [38, 61] of all OP insecticide poisonings (Table 4). Dichlorvos (Nuvan) was the compound used in 17 to 24% of OP poisoning. Malathion was the third most commonly used OP agent for poisoning [73]. Monocrotophos was not reported in any publication.

Discussion

There is no systematic system for suicide surveillance in Nepal [20]. Suicide and attempted suicide cases need to be reported to the police but due to the stigma and perceived (not actual) illegality of the act, many cases are believed to not be reported, leading to under-reporting of national data [16, 20]. In addition, there is misclassification as well as gaps in hospital record-keeping. This is a common situation across South Asia in countries with an uncertain legal status for suicide [75]. A small anomaly in Nepal is that group suicides are recorded by the police as a single suicide, further reducing numbers.

The WHO presents a wide range of competing estimates for suicide in Nepal, both considerably higher and lower than the official statistics. In 2014, the WHO modelled a 2012 predicted suicide rate, ranking Nepal 7th in the world at 24.9 per 100,000, the 3d highest for women (20 per 100,000) and 17th for men (30.1 per 100,000) [13]. In contrast, the WHO Global Health Estimates for 2019 reports 2544 suicides in Nepal (markedly lower than the 5819 reported by the police), of which 1176 (8.0/100,000) occurred in females and 1368 (11.4) occurred in males. This equates to an overall suicide rate of 9.6/1000,000, lower than the mean global rate of 10.5/100,000 population [13]. The discrepancy in numbers shows the importance of developing reliable national data on suicides and pesticide suicides.

Nepal’s hospital staff have difficulties identifying the compounds responsible for poisoning for patients who present to hospitals. In most cases, when the poisoning agent is recorded in hospital records, the patient or their family brought the containers to the hospital. When the compound used is not known, the atropine challenge test is used to determine if the patient ingested an OP chemical [37]. For the non-OP pesticides, the diagnosis is usually based on the container or information from the patient or family. In cases of OP poisoning determined by the atropine challenge test, the exact compound is usually unknown. If there is no container of the ingested compound and the atropine challenge is negative, the name of the agent is not indicated in the medical notes, making it difficult to identify the responsible agent.

We found that the number of suicides in Nepal have increased markedly since 1980, mostly due to a great increase in suicides from hanging. Pesticide suicides have made up about ¼ of suicides during this time but have not increased in number to the same extent. The most important pesticides responsible for pesticide poisonings and deaths in the literature has been OP pesticides. Most frequently used was methyl parathion (Metacid); although banned in 2006, it still appears as widely used poisoning agent, suggesting that the pesticide may have come across the border from India. However, very few patients bring the pesticide bottles with them to hospital and the pesticide is named from memory. Since Metacid is a widely used pesticide, it is possible that the term Metacid is used generally for any pesticides as occurred in Sri Lanka with Folidol (another brand name for methyl-parathion) and then Tamaron (methamidophos). This habit may have led to an overestimation of the importance of methyl parathion as poisoning agent. Our recent data from forensic science laboratories which identify the actual compounds ingested in fatal poisoning suggest that methyl-parathion poisoning is not a significant problem in Nepal anymore (Ghimire et al., submitted).

The other important pesticides for fatal self-poisoning were dichlorvos and aluminum phosphide, which were either banned completely (dichlorvos) or high concentration formulations banned (aluminum phosphide) in 2019.

Other pesticides have become increasingly frequently identified as involved in pesticide poisoning, including cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, and malathion. Since the historically most important pesticides for suicide (methyl-parathion, dichlorvos and aluminum phosphide tablets) are now banned in Nepal, it will be important to observe for changes in the Nepal’s suicide rate. In this context, implementation of the regulations and elimination of the illegal sales become very important, as well as providing farmers with advice on substitution of banned pesticides. Based on data from elsewhere in Asia [76], these HHPs bans should result in a marked fall in pesticide suicides over the next 2–5 years.

Nepal has been successful at reducing the number of HHPs used in its agriculture, despite the increase in use of pesticides. This likely accounts for the very low number of occupational poisoning cases we have found to be admitted in hospital in Nepal (Ghimire, submitted). There are now only two WHO class Ia (bromadiolon) and Ib (Zinc Phosphide) pesticides left in use in Nepal. The necessity of their use should be reviewed by the PQPMC and removed if they cannot be used safely. As the recent bans are enacted and stockpiles run out, it will be important to see which WHO hazard class II insecticides become problematic for suicide, requiring an analysis of their need in agriculture.

Limitations

We used police data for suicide deaths. Due to stigma and fear of perceived negative consequences, this likely underrepresents the actual numbers of suicides. To identify the agent used for poisoning we reviewed the literature to identify the agents. This is less reliable than accurate hospital based collection of data on the poisoning agent and ideally identification of the actual compound through forensic toxicology laboratory analysis. In addition, there is misclassification as well as gaps in hospital record-keeping.

Conclusion

In the last twenty years (2001–2019), Nepal has banned many HHPs, including the ones that were commonly used for pesticide self-poisoning. During this time, the incidence of hanging has risen markedly with a much smaller increase in pesticide suicides, which might be related to the regulation. Research is now needed on the effect of the 2019 ban of eight pesticides, many of which have been key for pesticide suicides over the last 15 years.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available from Leah Utyasheva upon request.

Abbreviations

a.i:

active ingredient

AKC:

Agriculture Knowledge Centre

HHPs:

Highly Hazardous Pesticides

HMIS:

Health Management Information System

LMIC:

Low-and Middle-Income Country

MoALD:

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development

OP pesticide:

Organophosphorus pesticide

PADD:

Provincial Agriculture Development Directorate

POP:

Persistent Organic Pollutants

PQPMC:

Plant Quarantine and Pesticide Management Centre

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organisation. The International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management. Rome: FAO; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Food and Agriculture Organization, World Health Organization. Guidelines on Highly Hazardous Pesticides. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elver H. Report of the special rapporteur on the right to food. A/HRC/34/48. In. United Nations General Assembly: Human Rights Council; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FAO and WHO. Detoxifying agriculture and health from highly hazardous pesticides - A call for action. Rome: FAO; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management. Guidelines on Highly Hazardous Pesticides. Rome: FAO; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karunarathne A, Gunnell D, Konradsen F, Eddleston M. How many premature deaths from pesticide suicide have occurred since the agricultural Green Revolution? Clin Toxicol (Philadelphia, Pa). 2020;58(4):227-32.

  7. Gunnell D, Fernando R, Hewagama M, Priyangika WDD, Konradsen F, Eddleston M. The impact of pesticide regulations on suicide in Sri Lanka. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(6):1235–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dym164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Knipe DW, Gunnell D, Eddleston M. Preventing deaths from pesticide self-poisoning - learning from Sri Lanka's success. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(7):e651–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30208-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manuweera G, Eddleston M, Egodage S, Buckley NA. Do targeted bans of insecticides to prevent deaths from self-poisoning result in reduced agricultural output? Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(4):492–5. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11029.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chowdhury FR, Dewan G, Verma VR, Knipe DW, I.T. I, Faiz MA, Gunnell DJ, et al. Bans of WHO class I pesticides in Bangladesh - suicide prevention without hampering agricultural output. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;47:175–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cha ES, Chang SS, Gunnell D, Eddleston M, Khang YH, Lee WJ. Impact of paraquat regulation on suicide in South Korea. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(2):470–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonvoisin T, Utyasheva L, Knipe D, Gunnell D, Eddleston M. Suicide by pesticide poisoning in India: a review of pesticide regulations and their impact on suicide trends. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8339-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization. Preventing suicide. A global imperative. Geneva: WHO; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eddleston M, Gunnell D. Preventing suicide through pesticide regulation. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(1):9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30478-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagaman AK, Khadka S, Lohani S, Kohrt B. Suicide in Nepal: a modified psychological autopsy investigation from randomly selected police cases between 2013 and 2015. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017;52(12):1483–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-017-1433-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Marahatta K, Samuel R, Sharma P, Dixit L, Shrestha BR. Suicide burden and prevention in Nepal: the need for a national strategy. WHO South-East Asia J Public Health. 2017;6(1):45–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.206164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thapaliya S, Gupta AK, Tiwari S, Belbase M, Paudyal S. Pattern of suicide attempts in southern Nepal: a multi-centered retrospective study. MedPhoenix. 2018;3:41–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joshi SK. Pesticides poisoning in Nepal (editorial). Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2003;1:157.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tuladar BS. Trends of clinical toxicology cases in Nepal. J Forensic Res. 2014;5:217.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hagaman AK, Maharjan U, Kohrt BA. Suicide surveillance and health systems in Nepal: a qualitative and social network analysis. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2016;10(1):46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-016-0073-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Palikhe BR. Pesticide management in Nepal: in view of code of conduct. In: Regional workshop on International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides: implementation, monitoring and observance. Bangkok: FAO; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, World Health Organization. The International Code of Conduct on Pesticide Management. Rome: FAO; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma DR. Status of Chemical Pesticides Use and their Regulation in Nepal; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. World Health Organization. The WHO recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification: 2009. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nepal Police Headquarters. Annual suicide numbers. In: Ghimire R, editor. Email communication; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karki P, Hansdak SG, Bhandari S, Shukla A, Koirala S. A clinico-epidemiological study of organophosphorus poisoning at a rural-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal. Trop Dr. 2001;31(1):32–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/004947550103100112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chakrabarti K, Devkota KC. Retrospective study of suicide cases admitted in Nepal medical college teaching hospital. Nepal Med Coll J. 2004;6(2):116–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghimire R, SP S, KR P. A Comparative Study of Changing Trends of Acute Poisoning Cases Admitted in the Internal Medicine Department of TUTH and Bharatpur District Hospital, between 1990–1992 and 2000-2002. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2003.

  29. Gupta S, Joshi M. Pesticide poisoning cases Attneding five major hospitals of Nepal. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2002;41:447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Subba SH, Binu VS, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Arun M, Patil R, et al. Pattern and trend of deliberate self-harm in western Nepal. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(3):704–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01040.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Khadka SB, Ale SB. A study of poisoning cases in emergency Kathmandu medical college teaching hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2005;3(4):388–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chhetri H, Khan G, Acharya A, Maharjan S, Manandhar M, Manandhar R, et al. ACUTE ORGANOPHOSPHATE POISONING: PATTERN, MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES. Pharmacologyonline; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kishore PV, Palaian S, Paudel R, Mishra D, Ojha P, Alam K, et al. Pattern of poisoning cases in a teaching Hospital in Western Nepal. J Institute Med Nepal. 2008;30(1):26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Paudyal BP. Poisoning : pattern and profile of admitted cases in a hospital in Central Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2005;44(159):92–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh DP, Aacharya R. Pattern of poisonign cases in Bir hospital. J Institute Med Nepal. 2006;28(1):3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Budhathoki S, Poudel P, Shah D, Bhatta NK, Dutta AK, Shah GS, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of children presenting with poisoning or intoxication: a hospital based study. Nepal Med Coll J. 2009;11(3):170–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Agrawaal KK, Karki P. Clinico-epidemiological study on pesticide poisoning in a tertiary care hospital in eastern Nepal. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2014;52(196):972–6. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.2796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhattarai N, Rauniyar A, Chaudhary D, Jaiswal S, Banthia P, Rana BB. Patterns of organophosphorous poisoning attending a teaching hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2006;45(162):228–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Malla T, Malla KK, Rao KS, Gauchan E, S B, Koirala DP. A scenario of poisoning in children in Manipal teaching hospital. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2001;31(2):83–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Koirala D, Rao K, Malla K, Malla T. A study of Cliniocal features, management and outcome of Organophosphate and carbamate poisoning in children. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2013;33(2):85–90. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v33i2.7799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pradhan SN, Adhikary SR. A study of severity of intention of suicide in various psychiatric diagnoses. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2009;7(25):63–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Marahatta SB, Singh J, Shrestha R, Koju R. Poisoning cases attending emergency department in Dhulikhel Hospital- Kathmandu University Teaching Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2009;7(26):152–6. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v7i2.2711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Gurung CK, Dahal R, Khanal P, Nepal S, Jaiswal AK. Pattern of poisoning cases in a hospital in a Terai district of Central Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(3):160–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Thapa SR, Lama P, Karki N, Khadka SB. Pattern of poisoning cases in emergency Department of Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2008;6(2):209–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chhetri UD, Ansari I, Shrestha S. Pattern of pediatric poisoning and accident in Patan hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2012;10(39):39–43. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i3.8016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Maskey A, Parajuli M, Kohli SC, Baral S, Basnet S. N P: scenario of poisoning cases in adults admitted in Manipal teaching hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. Nepal J Med Sci. 2012;1(1):23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dhakal AK, Shrestha D, Shakya A, Shah SC, Shakya H. Clinical profile of acute poisoning in children at a teaching Hospital in Lalitpur. J Nepal Paediatr Soc. 2014;34(2):100–3. https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v34i2.10139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lamsal D. Acute pesticide poisoning : review of PAtients attending at emergency Department in Chitwan Medical College. J Chitwan Med Col. 2013;3(3):62–4. https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v3i1.8469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Baral B, Rajbhandari S, Shrestha A, Basnet B, Prasad PN. Acute poisoning cases in emergency Department of Tertiary Level Hospital, Kathmandu. J Gen Pract Emerg Med Nepal. 2011;2(3):54–8.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Karki RK, Risal A. Study of poisoning cases in a tertiary care hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2012;10(40):70–3. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v10i4.10999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. K.C S, Giri S, Gupta S, Pandey G. Scenario of Poisoning Cases in Devdaha Medical College Teaching Hospital, Pupandeni, Nepal: A Retrospective Study. Pharmaceutical Biosci J. 2020;8(3):01–4.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bajracharya M, Khadka P, Wagle L. A retrospective study of poisoning cases in Manmohan memorial teaching hospital. J Manmohan Memorial Institute Health Sci. 2018;4(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmmihs.v4i1.21144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mandal L, Bhattarai MD, Gaire D, Koirala M, Bhattarai T, Adhikari S, et al. A study of organophosphorus poisoning at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Postgraduate Med J NAMS. 2013;13(1):31-3.

  54. Rimal HS, Tiwari U, Ghimire K. M T: hospital based study of poisoning among children, 1 to 18 years of age in eastern Nepal. Birat J Health Sci. 2017;2(2):138–41. https://doi.org/10.3126/bjhs.v2i1.17293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shakya R, Adhikari S, Bajracharya R. Pattern of acute poisoning attending a tertiary Care Hospital of Western Nepal. J Lumbini Med Col. 2016;4(2):90. https://doi.org/10.22502/jlmc.v4i2.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Karki N, Singh V, Verma V. Pattern, management, and outcome of poisoning in a tertiary care hospital. J Lumbini Med Col. 2018;6(1):32-5.

  57. Gaire D, Mandal L, Shrestha SL. Sociodemographic profile of organophosphorus poisoning case in a tertiary Care Hospital of Nepal. Post Graduate Med J Nat Acad Med Sci. 2015;16(01):19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gyenwali D, Vaidya A, Tiwari S, Khatiwada P, Lamsal D, Giri S. Pesticide poisoning in Chitwan, Nepal: a Descriptive Epidemiological Study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:619.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Acharya K, Kandel IS, Gupta S, Poudel SD. A study on incidence and patterns of acute poisoning cases in an emergency Department of Western Region of Nepal. J Gandaki Med Col Nepal. 2019;12(2):59–62. https://doi.org/10.3126/jgmcn.v12i2.27211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Rajbanshi LK, Arjyal B, Mandal R. Clinical profile and outcome of patients with acute poisoning admitted in intensive care unit of tertiary Care Center in Eastern Nepal. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2018;22(10):691–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_207_18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Shrestha T, Aacharya R, Rp N. Predicting outcome of acute organophosphorus poisoning using poison severity score in patients presenting at a university hospital in Nepal. J Inst Med. 2018;40:17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chaudhary R, Rai B, Poudel M, Yadav A, Kafle N, Khadga SN, et al. Trend of poisoned patients’ in emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital of eastern Nepal. Int J Health Econ Policy. 2017;2:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bhandari R, Bhandari R, Gupta PP: Trend and outcome of acute poisoning case: an experience from emergency department of eastern Nepal. 2017, 5(1):6.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Timsinha S, Rajesh S, Kar S. Sociodemographic characteristics and assessment of severity in organophosphorus poisoning in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017;5(9):3786–93. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20173950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chataut J, Adhikari RK, Sinha NP, Marahatta SB. Pattern of organophosphorous poisoning: a retrospective community based study. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2011;9(34):31–4. https://doi.org/10.3126/kumj.v9i2.6284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Jha S, Yadav BN, et al. Int J Ther Appl. 2014;17:10–5.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yadav S, Yadav SP, Agrawal J, Shah G: Pattern of acute poisoning in children in a tertiary care hospital in eastern Nepal. 2016, 3(3):5.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Paudyal BP. Organophosphorus poisoning. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2008;47(172):251–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Thapaliya S, Sharma P, Upadhyaya K. Suicide and self harm in Nepal: a scoping review. Asian J Psychiatr. 2018;32:20–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.11.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rai BK. An epidemiological study of poisoning and Oitcome of treatment in emergency wards of a tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern Region of Nepal. Health Renaissance. 2010;7(1):43–6.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kar SM, Timsinha S, Agrawal P. An epidemiological study of organophosphorus poisoning at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2010;32(2):108-9.

  72. Rehiman S, Lohani SP, Bhattarai MC. Correlation of serum cholinesterase level, clinical score at presentation and severity of organophosphorous poisoning. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2008;47(170):47–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mishra A, Shukla A, Yadav A, Gupta A. Epidemiological study of medicolegal organophosphorus poisoning in central region of Nepal. J Forensic Res. 2012;3:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Shrestha B, Singh PM, Bharati U, Dhungel S. Poisonings at Nepal medical college teaching hospital. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(3):199–204.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Jacob KS. Suicide in India: part perceptions, partial insights, and inadequate solutions. The Nat Med J India. 2017;30(3):155–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Gunnell D, Eddleston M, Phillips MR, Konradsen F. The global distribution of fatal pesticide self-poisoning: systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2007;7(1):357. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Biren Bangdel for assistance with conducting interviews. We are grateful to Dr. Neshan Rai and Ms. Manisha Pokhrel for their help in the systematic review.

Funding

The Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention is funded by an incubation grant from the Open Philanthropy Project on the recommendation of GiveWell. The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University of Edinburgh, QMRI E3.22a, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK

    Leah Utyasheva, Dilli Sharma, Ayanthi Karunarathne, Gael Robertson & Michael Eddleston

  2. Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

    Rakesh Ghimire

  3. Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutics, University/BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

    Michael Eddleston

Authors
  1. Leah Utyasheva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dilli Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rakesh Ghimire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ayanthi Karunarathne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gael Robertson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michael Eddleston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ME conceptualized the study. ME and LU designed the study, acquired the data and drafted and revised the manuscript. AK performed the statistical analysis; DS, RG and GR contributed to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Eddleston.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was received from the Nepal Health Research Council on 24 January 2018 (Registration No 535/2017, Ref No. 2397).

This study used secondary data. No participants/ subjects were recruited for this study. All research methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

No identifiable data from patients were collected and will be published.

Competing interests

No competing interests are declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Utyasheva, L., Sharma, D., Ghimire, R. et al. Suicide by pesticide ingestion in Nepal and the impact of pesticide regulation. BMC Public Health 21, 1136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11155-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11155-3

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us