Skip to main content

Understanding differences within ethnic group designation: comparing risk factors and health indicators between Iranian and Arab Americans in Northern California

Abstract

Background

The Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) ethnic group is a diverse group composed of two primary subsets in the United States: Iranian and Arab Americans. We aimed to compare health risk factors, chronic health conditions, and mental health conditions of Iranian and Arab American adults in Northern California.

Methods

We used cross-sectional electronic health record (EHR) data from a 2016 Northern California health plan study cohort to compare adults classified as Iranian or Arab American based on ethnicity, language, or surname. We produced age-standardized prevalence estimates of obesity, smoking, hyperlipidemia, prediabetes, diabetes, hypertension, depression, and anxiety for Iranian and Arab American men and women by age group (35–44, 45–64, and 65–84) and overall (35–84). We used generalized linear models to calculate prevalence ratios (PR) to compare Iranian and Arab American adults ages 35–84 on all health indicators.

Results

Compared to Arab Americans, Iranian Americans had a lower prevalence of obesity (PR: 0.77, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.73, 0.82), current smoking (PR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), and ever smoking (PR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.99), but a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia (PR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.12), prediabetes (PR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.16), depression (PR; 1.41, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.52), and anxiety (PR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.63). Similar patterns were observed for men and women.

Conclusion

This work supports the need to collect granular data on race and ethnicity within the MENA ethnic group to improve identification in clinical care settings and population health reporting to better address the physical and mental health needs of different MENA subgroups.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The Middle Eastern and North African ethnic category (MENA) is diverse and is composed of two primary groups in the United States (US): Arab Americans and Iranian Americans. Arab Americans have cultural or ethnic origins in one of 22 Arabic speaking countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Arab Americans have been consistently immigrating to the US in multiple migration waves since the 1880s. There are approximately 4 million Arab Americans living in the US, with the largest number residing in California [1]. The other large subset in the MENA designation are Iranian Americans. The majority of the approximately 0.5–1 million Iranian Americans identify as first- or second- generation Iranian immigrants, and live in California [2]. Initial Arab immigrants to the US were primarily Christian, although recent waves are more commonly majority Muslim. Iranian immigrants are most commonly Muslim, with a small minority participating in other religions. The start of Iranian immigration to the US began shortly after the 1979 Revolution. Those who left Iran after the revolution were adults and professionals [2], making the circumstances of their immigration different from Arab immigration patterns [3]. Both Arab Americans and Iranian Americans make up the majority of the MENA ethnic category in the US, but little is known about potential differences in health indicators between these two groups.

Within ethnic categories, differences in risk factors and health indicators have been observed for Latinx, Asian, and Black Americans. While some differences within ethnic categories have been attributed to country of origin [4,5,6], others are related to differences in lived experiences in the US which result from differential experiences with discrimination and stigma [7,8,9]. Research into health differences within ethnic categories has also led to observations about immigration related health patterns, like the healthy immigrant paradox, which does not seem to hold for all ethnic groups [10,11,12,13,14]. While the majority of research in this area has focused on racial and ethnic minority groups, recent evidence suggests there is substantial diversity within the non-Hispanic White category on health measures found in the American Community Survey, which includes MENA Americans [15].

No studies, to our knowledge, have attempted to identify potential differences in health characteristics between groups within the MENA ethnic category. To address this knowledge gap, we used electronic health record (EHR) data from a large health care delivery system in Northern California to compare risk factors, chronic and mental health conditions of Arab Americans and Iranian Americans who were health plan members in this system during the 2016 calendar year. Our aim was to document similarities and differences in the health-related profiles of Arab and Iranian Americans to raise awareness about the health needs of each subgroup, including priorities for primary and secondary prevention.

Methods

Setting and study sample

This study used data for 18,072 Arab Americans and 5777 Iranian Americans who were identified from a 2016 race/ethnicity study cohort of Kaiser Permanent North California (KPNC) members aged 35–84. KPNC is an integrated health care delivery system that provides primary and specialty healthcare, pharmacy, and laboratory services to over 3.4 million adults in the San Francisco and Greater Bay Area. Details about the EHR study cohort and KPNC can be found elsewhere [16]. This study was approved by Kaiser Permanente Northern California’s Institutional Review Board.

Ethnicity

Ethnicity was determined from EHR data using a combination of strategies. First, race and ethnic codes assigned individuals coded as Iranian or Persian to the Iranian American group and individuals with a code for any of 22 Arab League countries to the Arab American group. Second, for those not assignable this way, we used preferred spoken and written language indicated in the EHR. Farsi speakers (who did not have an Afghani ethnicity code or a recognizable Afghani surname) were assigned to the Iranian American group and Arabic speakers were assigned to the Arab American group. As a last step, we used a vetted Arab surname list to identify likely Arab Americans [17].

Outcomes of interest

Outcomes were divided into three groups: risk factors, chronic health conditions, and mental health conditions. All outcomes of interest were ascertained from EHR and disease registry data as described in Gordon et al. [16]. Risk factors included obesity, current and ever smoking, hyperlipidemia diagnosis, and prediabetes diagnosis. Chronic health conditions included diagnosed diabetes and hypertension. Mental health conditions included diagnosed depression and anxiety. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) was calculated using height and weight data recorded closest to December 1, 2016. Current and ever smoking were determined from tobacco use data closest to December 1, 2016, going back up to 2012 for individuals who did not have more recent data or were only recorded as nonsmokers. Hyperlipidemia, hypertension, depression, and anxiety were determined from ICD-9 and ICD-10 ambulatory visit diagnosis codes in the individual’s EHR during calendar years 2015–2016 or from the December 2016 problem list. Diabetes was determined from presence in the health plan’s Diabetes Registry by December 31, 2016. Prediabetes was determined by having an ICD-9 or ICD-10 visit code for prediabetes or a 2016 lab value in the prediabetes range (HgA1c in the 5.7–6.4 range or fasting glucose in the 100- < 126 range) and not being in the Diabetes Registry by December 31, 2016. For more details, see Gordon et al. [16].

Analysis

Data were analyzed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, IN, 2013). To control for differences in the age compositions of the Arab and Iranian American groups, we used a Proc Surveyreg procedure recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [18] to produce age-standardized prevalence estimates for these groups, overall and by sex. Age-standardized prevalence estimates were similarly calculated for three age subgroups (35–44, 45–64, 65–84 years of age). We used 2016 US Census counts for five age groups (35–44, 45–54, 55–64, 65–75, and 75–84) to produce age-standardized prevalence estimates for the 35–84 age group and two age groups (45–54, 55–64 and 65–74, 75–84) to produce estimates for the 45–64 and 65–84 age groups, respectively. Proc Genmod was used to calculate sex-stratified and age-adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) for Iranian Americans compared to Arab Americans. Statistically significant differences mentioned in the text are at the p < 0.05 level.

Results

Sample characteristics

The Arab American and Iranian American women in the study cohort were similar in age, with mean ages of 53.2 years and 55.7 years, respectively. Among men, the Arab American group was significantly younger than the Iranian Arab American group (mean ages of 53.2 years and 59.0 years, respectively). Arab American men had greater representation in the younger age group than Iranian American men with 29.4% versus 14.2% in the 35–44 age group and 18.7% versus 36.4% in the 65–84 age group, respectively. Iranian American women had a younger age distribution than Iranian American men, with 23.9% of women and 14.2% of men in the 35–44 age group; Arab American women and men had similar age distributions. While both groups were majority English speakers, adults in the Iranian American group were less likely than those in the Arab American group to have English indicated as their spoken language (87.0% versus 95.4%, p < 0.01).

Risk factors

Across all age groups, Arab American men and women had a higher prevalence of obesity than Iranian American men and women, with the highest prevalence among all groups found in the 45–64 age group (Table 1). Prevalence of current smoking was higher among Arab American than Iranian American men and women ages 35–84, but within age groups, the difference was only significant among women aged 35–44. In the 35–84, 45–64 and 65–84 age groups, Iranian American women and men had a higher prevalence of diagnosed hyperlipidemia and prediabetes than Arab American women and men. Iranian Americans had a lower overall age-adjusted prevalence of obesity (PR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.82) and current smoking (PR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.89) and higher overall prevalence of hyperlipidemia (PR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.06 1.12) and prediabetes (PR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.16) than Arab Americans (Table 2); these patterns were seen in both men and women.

Table 1 Prevalence of chronic disease risk factors, chronic health, and mental health outcomes stratified by Arab or Iranian ethnicity, sex, and age group from a Northern California health system in 2016
Table 2 Age-adjusted prevalence ratios comparing Iranian Americans to Arab Americans ages 35–84 on risk factors, chronic health, and mental health outcomes

Chronic health conditions

Among both Iranian and Arab Americans, men in the 45–64 and 65–84 year olds had a higher prevalence of diabetes than women, and in the 45–64 age group, a higher prevalence of hypertension (Table 1). Across all age groups, the prevalence of diabetes within gender groups was similar for Iranian and Arab Americans. In the 45–64 age group, the prevalence of hypertension was lower in Iranian American women than Arab American women (16.7% vs. 20.6%). Iranian Americans aged 35–84 had a lower overall age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension (PR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93, 1.00) than Arab Americans, with similar patterns seen among men and women (Table 2).

Mental health conditions

Across all age groups, prevalence of clinically diagnosed anxiety was higher among Iranian American men and women compared to Arab Americans (Table 1). Prevalence of clinically diagnosed depression was higher among Iranian American women than Arab American women in all age groups, with no significant ethnic group differences among men. Notably, in both ethnic groups, prevalence of diagnosed depression was higher among women and men in the 65–84 age group than in the other age groups. Older Iranian American women had the highest burden of mental health issues, with approximately 26 and 24% having diagnoses of anxiety and depression, respectively. Iranian Americans had higher overall age-adjusted prevalence of diagnosed anxiety (PR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.42, 1.63) and depression (PR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.52) than Arab Americans with similar ethnic group differences seen for men and women (Table 2).

Discussion

Arab Americans and Iranian Americans are the two largest subgroups within the MENA ethnic category, but little is known about potential differences in health indicators between these two groups. Our study found significant differences, and some similarities, between Arab Americans and Iranian Americans in the prevalence of risk factors, chronic health conditions, and mental health conditions. Specifically, compared to Arab American men and women, Iranian American men and women had lower age-adjusted prevalence of obesity and current smoking and higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, prediabetes, anxiety and depression; similar prevalence levels for diabetes and hypertension were observed in the two groups.

Iranian Americans in our study had higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia than Arab Americans. This is consistent with other research that found hyperlipidemia to be higher among Iranian populations than other populations around the world [19]. The high overall prevalence of hyperlipidemia in our study was also in line with a large systematic review of the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia in Iran [19]. This systematic review also found that Iranian women had higher rates of dyslipidemia than men, as we found in the oldest age group in our cohort. Arab Americans have been found to have higher prevalence of diabetes than non-Hispanic Whites in multiple settings [20, 21]. The similarity in diabetes and hypertension prevalence among Iranian Americans and Arab Americans and higher prevalence of prediabetes among Iranian Americans, despite significantly higher prevalence of obesity among Arab Americans, suggests that more research is needed to identify dietary and other social, behavioral, or genetic factors that may be differently influencing the development of these risks and chronic conditions in Iranian American adults. Culturally tailored interventions may be needed to reduce cardiometabolic risks in this population.

The Iranian Americans in our study had higher prevalence of diagnosed depression and anxiety than Arab Americans. Middle Eastern populations have been found to have difficulty in discussing feelings of depression due to differences in vocabulary and cultural expectations around sharing these feelings with others [22]. We cannot determine whether the differences observed in our study between Iranian and Arab Americans in prevalence of depression and anxiety reflect a true difference in the experience of these conditions or are a result of differential underdiagnoses of existing conditions due to patients’ reluctance to discuss these types of feelings with their healthcare providers. Little work has been done to characterize the mental health needs of Iranian Americans in the US, although there is some evidence of a stigma associated with mental healthcare access in this population [23]. Differences in mental health may also, in part, be due to differences in experiences of discrimination and bias [24]. If Iranian Americans are experiencing higher levels of discrimination and bias, due to acculturation status or time since immigration, they could be at higher risk for mental health issues than Arab Americans. Alternatively, Iranian Americans may be more comfortable sharing feelings of depression and anxiety with their providers than Arab Americans due to differences in acculturation or culture, although there is no evidence of this in published literature [24, 25]. Immigration related factors, like time since immigration and circumstances related to immigration may also be contributing to differences in mental health outcomes between these two groups [26].

Our study has a number of limitations that should be considered in the interpretation of our findings. First, Iranian Americans included in this analysis had self-described their ethnicity status or indicated Farsi as a native language in their medical records. We may have been unable, therefore, to identify all Iranian Americans in the cohort. There is the potential for selection bias given the fact that individuals with an Iranian/Persian ethnic identification may be different from those without such a designation in their medical records. Second, the majority of Iranian Americans living in California reside in Southern California [27]. Our results may not be generalizable to the entire Iranian American population in California, let alone the US. Third, we could not account for acculturation status, a factor previously shown to impact differences in health outcomes in immigrant groups. While we had information on preferred spoken language, the EHR data did not include length of time lived in the US or other factors known to affect dietary and physical activity practices related to our outcomes of interest. We also lacked information on educational attainment, income, and other social and behavioral determinants of health that may differ between Iranian and Arab American groups.

Despite these limitations, our ability to utilize the electronic health records from a rich and sociodemographically diverse health care delivery system enabled us to demonstrate that there are diverse health needs within the MENA ethnic group. In previous work, we showed that the prevalence of risk factors, chronic and mental health conditions differed between Arab Americans and non-Hispanic Whites in this same cohort [28]. Specifically, Arab American men and women had a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia and prediabetes than non-Hispanic Whites. Recent evidence suggests that the composition of the non-Hispanic White category may be leading to large within group health differences that are not captured using standard race and ethnicity categories [15]. Given the differential patterns in health found within the MENA group, the additional evidence from this analysis supports further investigations into the diversity within the non-Hispanic White category.

Conclusions

Our observations are not easily observable using state and national survey data given the ways in which Arab and Iranian Americans are combined within the non-Hispanic White category. This work emphasizes the need to collect granular data on the race and ethnicity of minority Americans in order to help clinicians and public health departments address their health needs and target appropriate interventions to these communities. Further, disaggregating data within the MENA ethnic category, especially in areas with large Arab American and Iranian American representation, may improve our ability to document health disparities and meet the health needs of this growing minority population.

Availability of data and materials

The Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) Institutional Review Board has not provided approval for KPNC electronic health record data used for this study to be placed in a public access repository. Additional statistics derived from the data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. To request access to data used by this study, researchers should contact the corresponding author, who will then need to get approval for the request from the KPNC Division of Research Data Sharing Workgroup.

References

  1. Arab American Institute Foundation. Arab American Demographics. 2014. https://yallacountmein.org/materials/arab-amreican-demographics. Accessed  1 June 2021.

  2. Salari S. Invisible in aging research: Arab Americans, Middle Eastern immigrants, and Muslims in the United States. The Gerontologist. 2002;42(5):580–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.5.580.

  3. Foad HS. Waves of immigration from the Middle East to the United States. Rochester: Social Science Research Network; 2013. Report No.: ID 2383505. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2383505. [cited 2021 Jan 8].

  4. Fenelon A, Chinn JJ, Anderson RN. A comprehensive analysis of the mortality experience of Hispanic subgroups in the United States: variation by age, country of origin, and nativity. SSM Popul Health. 2017;3:245–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.011.

  5. Hamilton TG, Hummer RA. Immigration and the health of US Black adults: does country of origin matter? Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(10):1551–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.07.026.

  6. Hamilton TG, Green TL. Intergenerational differences in smoking among West Indian, Haitian, Latin American, and African Blacks in the United States. SSM-Popul Health. 2017;3:305–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.007.

  7. Murillo R, Echeverria S, Vasquez E. Differences in neighborhood social cohesion and aerobic physical activity by Latino subgroup. SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec 1;2:536–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marcello RK, Dolle J, Tariq A, Kaur S, Wong L, Curcio J, et al. Disaggregating Asian Race Reveals COVID-19 Disparities among Asian Americans at New York City’s Public Hospital System. medRxiv. 2020;

  9. Otiniano Verissimo AD, Grella CE, Amaro H, Gee GC. Discrimination and substance use disorders among Latinos: the role of gender, nativity, and ethnicity. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(8):1421–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Abuelezam NN, El-Sayed AM, Galea S. Relevance of the “immigrant health paradox” for the health of Arab Americans in California. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(12):1733–8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cole HV, Reed HE, Tannis C, Trinh-Shevrin C, Ravenell JE. Peer reviewed: awareness of high blood pressure by nativity among Black men: implications for interpreting the immigrant health paradox. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170570.

  12. Lau AS, Tsai W, Shih J, Liu LL, Hwang W-C, Takeuchi DT. The immigrant paradox among Asian American Women: are disparities in the burden of depression and anxiety paradoxical or explicable? J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81(5):901–11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3835700/. [cited 2020 29 Oct].

  13. John DA, De Castro A, Martin DP, Duran B, Takeuchi DT. Does an immigrant health paradox exist among Asian Americans? Associations of nativity and occupational class with self-rated health and mental disorders. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2085–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Palloni A, Morenoff JD. Interpreting the paradoxical in the Hispanic paradox: demographic and epidemiologic approaches. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;954(1):140–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02751.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Read JG, Lynch SM, West JS. Disaggregating heterogeneity among non-Hispanic Whites: evidence and implications for U.S. racial/ethnic health disparities. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2021. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09632-5, 40, 1, 9, 31. [cited 2021 Feb 8].

  16. Gordon NP, Lin TY, Rau J, Lo JC. Aggregation of Asian-American subgroups masks meaningful differences in health and health risks among Asian ethnicities: an electronic health record based cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 25;19(1):1551. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7683-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasseri K. Construction and validation of a list of common Middle Eastern surnames for epidemiological research. Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(5):424–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.006.

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sample code to generate age adjusted prevalence using SAS Survey Procedures [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/tutorials/age_adj_prev_sas_92.sas.

  19. Tabatabaei-Malazy O, Qorbani M, Samavat T, Sharifi F, Larijani B, Fakhrzadeh H. Prevalence of dyslipidemia in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(4):373–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Abuelezam NN, El-Sayed AM, Galea S. Differences in health behaviors and health outcomes among non-Hispanic Whites and Arab Americans in a population-based survey in California. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):892. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7233-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dallo FJ, Ruterbusch JJ, Kirma JD, Schwartz K, Fakhouri M. A Health profile of Arab Americans in Michigan: a novel approach to using a hospital administrative database. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2016;18(6):1449–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-015-0296-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Krenawi A, Graham JR. Culturally sensitive social work practice with Arab clients in mental health settings. Health Soc Work. 2000;25(1):9–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/25.1.9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hannani M. The role of shame and acculturation in the mental health of Iranian Americans. (Doctoral dissertation, Alliant International University); 2022.

  24. Shishehgar S, Gholizadeh L, DiGiacomo M, Davidson PM. The impact of migration on the health status of Iranians: an integrative literature review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015;15(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghaffarian S. The acculturation of Iranian immigrants in the United States and the implications for mental health. J Soc Psychol. 1998;138(5):645–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mobasher M. Cultural trauma and ethnic identity formation among Iranian immigrants in the United States. Am Behav Sci. 2006;50(1):100–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206289656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mobasher MM. The Iranian diaspora: challenges, negotiations, and transformations. University of Texas Press; 2018.

  28. Abuelezam NN, El-Sayed AM, Galea S, Gordon NP. Health risks and chronic health conditions among Arab American and White adults in Northern California. Ethn Dis. 2021;31(2):235–42. https://doi.org/10.18865/ed.31.2.235.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Kaiser Permanente Northern California Community Benefit Program, which provided funding for the creation of the study cohort used for these analyses.

Funding

The authors did not receive any funding for the research presented in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NNA was responsible for the conception, design, drafting and critical revision of the article. AME was responsible for conception and critical revision of the article. SG was responsible for conception, design, and critical revision of the article. NPG was responsible for the conception, design, statistical analysis, drafting and critical revision of the article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia N. Abuelezam.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by KPNC’s Institutional Review Board (Protocol #1279536). The IRB waived the requirement to obtain informed consent. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abuelezam, N.N., El-Sayed, A., Galea, S. et al. Understanding differences within ethnic group designation: comparing risk factors and health indicators between Iranian and Arab Americans in Northern California. BMC Public Health 21, 1074 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11121-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11121-z

Keywords