Skip to main content

Advertisement

The association between residential density and physical activity among urban adults in regional China

BMC Public Health volume 19, Article number: 1279 (2019) Cite this article

Article metrics

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Studies from Western countries reported a positive relationship between residential density (RD) and physical activity (PA) among adults. There was no such study from China, a rapidly-urbanizing country in the world. This study aimed to investigate the RD-PA association among urban adults in China.

Methods

A multistage sampling approach was used to randomly select participants (aged 35–74 years old) in urban areas of Nanjing in 2017. The outcome variable was PA (dichotomized into “sufficient” or “insufficient”), while the independent variable was RD (tertiled into three sub-groups). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed to examine the RD-PA association using mixed-effects logistic regression models with adjustment for age, sex, nationality, marriage, educational attainment, employment status, body weight status, green space and neighborhood-level clustering effects.

Results

Of the 1568 eligible participants, 1551 were interviewed (response rate = 98.9%), with the mean age (standard deviation) of 54.7 (11.1) years old, and 46% of men. After adjustment for potential confounders and community-level clustering effects, participants lived in communities with higher (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.21, 0.47) and middle (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.50, 0.99) residential density were significantly less likely to achieve sufficient physical activity relative to their counterparts lived in the lower densed communities. Similar negative RD-PA association was examined for men or women, separately. The difference in the ORs between the middle and higher RD tertiles was also statistically significant (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

A negatively gradient RD-PA association, independent of body weight status and green space, was observed among urban adults in regional China. It has public health implications for China to help residents’ promote and maintain physical activity through planning and constructing PA−/health-friendly built environment in future.

Open Peer Review reports

Background

China, as the biggest developing country in the world, has been experiencing a rapid economic growth and consequent urbanization over the past decades [1]. Urbanization usually means more and more people live in urban areas and suggests a high residential density (RD). For China, the urbanization rate dramatically increased from 17.9% in 1978 to 57.4% in 2016 [1]. Such rapid urbanization has been witnessing some health-unfriendly changes in residents’ health-related behavior patterns and lifestyles, including the declining physical activity (PA) level and the rising proportion of excess body weight among residents in China [2, 3] .

Recently, neighborhood built environment (BE) attributes have been identified as influence factors for residents’ lifestyle/behavior and the related health conditions [4, 5]. Neighborhood built environment attributes involved in health-related studies generally refer to the physical environment developed and constructed for people to live in, mainly including the following four domains: residential density, land-use mix (street connectivity, transport, sidewalks, etc.), access to destinations and aesthetics [6, 7]. Among those BE attributes, RD is a key feature that has comprehensive influence on residents’ physical activity and its related health consequences [8,9,10].

The majority of literature regarding RD and PA among adults is from Western countries with mixed findings. Most of the available studies showed a positive relationship between them [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. However, So far, no study is from China reporting RD-PA link among adults. Considering that China is the most populous society with rapid urbanization worldwide, China may have different scenario regarding RD-PA relationship from that in Western countries. To validate the Chinese version of Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale (PANES-CHN) and further to explore the association between RD and PA among adults in China, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional survey, The Built Environment and Chronic Health Conditions: Adults (BEACH-Adults), between late March and early July of 2017 in urban areas of Nanjing, China.

Methods

Participants and sampling approach

Nanjing, one of the mega-cities in the developed region of eastern China, was our study city, with more than 8 million registered population in 11 administration districts (6 urban and 5 rural/suburban) and a higher rate of urbanization (82.0%) relative to the average figure (57.4%) for the whole country in 2016 [19]. Under the specific context of China’s administrative system (5 strata in total: Central Government, Province/Municipality, District/County, Administrative Street/Town and Administrative Village/Residents Community), we used the residents community, the lowest and smallest stratum, as our sampling unit.

Considering our multi-stage sampling method and the two major purposes of our BEACH-Adults study, we estimated the sample size with attempt to warrant sufficient power (90%) for simultaneously validating PANES-CHN and examining associations of BE features with health conditions (overweight)/behavior (physical activity). Using parameters from our previous studies [20, 21], we estimated that approximately 1533 and 1269 subjects would be recruited for investigating RD-overweight and RD-PA relationship, respectively. Meanwhile about 1600 participants were required for validating PANES-CHN [22]. Therefore, we took 1600 as the sample size in our BEACH-Adults study. The eligible participants were local registered urban adults, without physical disability, aged 35–74 years old in Nanjing. Using a community-based multi-stage sampling approach, all these participants were randomly recruited within the 8 selected urban communities (firstly, 2 of 6 urban districts chosen; then, 4 streets from each selected district; and, next, one community/neighborhood per street selected) [22, 23]. To warrant the representativeness of participants for different age-groups (5-year interval), we chose the same number of participants as possible by age-group (totally, 8 groups), with men: women = 1:1.

Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before our survey. This study was approved by The Academic and Ethical Committee of Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention. All personally identifiable information was removed prior to data analysis.

Study variables

Outcome variable

PA was the outcome variable. Information on past 7-day’s physical activity time was collected using the validated Chinese version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-CHN) [23, 24]. This IPAQ-CHN has been professionally translated from the original IPAQ and validated for Chinese adults [24, 25]. The approach of PA time calculation of IPAQ-CHN was the same as that used in the original IPAQ (duration× frequency per week). The sum of moderate PA plus doubled vigorous PA time was used to categorize participants into: “achieving sufficient PA (≥150 minutes/week)” or “having insufficient PA (<150 minutes/week)” in our analysis [26].

Explanatory variable

RD was treated as the independent variable. The number of registered residents was divided by geographic size (km2) to compute RD for each study community and thus all participants within a community shared the same RD. In our analysis, RD was classified as tertiles (cutoffs: 29.8 thousands and 56.5 thousands residents/km2). Data on registered population and geographic size for each community were obtained from local statistical department [19, 27].

Covariates

There were some individual-level and community-level covariates accounted for in the mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, including participants’ socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics, and public green space. As participants’ socio-demographic features, body weight status and green space have been identified to be associated with physical activity in previous studies [28,29,30,31], it is acceptable and necessary to have those specific factors considered in the analysis. Meanwhile, a neighborhood-based multi-stage sampling approach was used to select participants in our study, which might cause potential clustering-effects at neighborhood level. Therefore, potential neighborhood-level clustering-effects were also necessary to be considered using mixed-effects logistic regression models in our analysis.

The selected socio-demographic characteristics were treated as categorical variables in the analysis: gender (men or women), age (younger: 35–49, middle: 50–64 or older: 65–74), nationality (Han or others), marital status (married or others), educational attainment (≤9 years, 10-12 years or 13 + years), occupation (while collar or blue collar). All the socio-demographic information was self-reported by our participants.

Body weight status was assessed using body mass index (BMI) based on the cutoffs recommended for Chinese adults [32]. Each participant’s body weight and height were objectively measured with light clothing and without shoes inside a quite room. Beam balance scales and stadiometers were used to measure participants’ body weight and height, respectively. The readings were recorded twice and the mean value was used to calculate BMI for each participant. Body weight status was classified as: non-excess body weight (BMI<24) or excess body weight (24+).

Public green space (m2) refers to those green spatial areas that local residents have free access to within/around the neighborhood within 15-min walking distance. The data on green space for each study community were also obtained from local statistical department [33]. In China, local statistical authority is responsible to record and updates community level green spatial areas. Residents within a community shared the same green space in this study.

Statistical analysis

In this study, 1568 eligible participants were recruited, while 1551 completed the survey (response rate = 98.9%). The difference in participants’ selected characteristics by gender and subgroups of residential density was compared using analysis of variance methods (continuous variables) or χ2 tests (categorical data). The relationship between RD and PA was examined with odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (OR and 95%CI) using mixed-effects logistic regression models. Three models were introduced: Model 1 was a univariate analysis with RD as the single predictor; Model 2 was a multivariate analysis with adjustment only for participants’ individual-level potential confounders (including age, gender, nationality, marital status, body weight status, educational attainment and employment status); Model 3 was also a multivariate analysis with adjustment for both individual-level and community-level potential confounders (green space and the clustering-effects of study community). Data were analyzed with SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

Table 1 displays the selected demographic characteristics of participants by gender and residential density. Among the overall participants, the mean age (Standard Deviation) was 54.7 (11.1) years old; 22.7% of participants obtained at least college level educational attainment; and 51.3% were with excess body weight (BMI = 24+). For participants within different RD sub-groups, there was no significant difference between age-groups. However, residents within higher RD tertile were more likely to have college-level educational attainment but less likely to have excess body weight.

Table 1 Selected characteristics of participants by gender and residential density in 2017, in Nanjing of China a
Full size table

Table 2 presents the relationship between residential density and physical activity among participants. Relative to participants within the lower tertile of residential density, adults within the middle (OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.50 to 0.99) and higher tertile (OR = 0.31, 95%CI = 0.21 to 0.47) were less likely to achieve sufficient physical activity after consideration of both individual- and community-level potential confounders. Furthermore, the difference in the ORs between the middle and higher RD tertiles was also statistically significant (P < 0.01). The scenario of such negative gradient RD-PA association remained for either men or women after stratified analysis by gender.

Table 2 Odds ratio (95% CI) for being in the higher physical activity group relative to being in the lower group among urban adults in Nanjing, China
Full size table

Discussion

This study examined the association between residential density and physical activity among urban adults in a rapidly-urbanizing region in China. A negative gradient association between residential density and physical activity was identified within the study participants in that the odds ratio of achieving sufficiently physical activity decreased by gradient from lower, middle to higher tertile of residential density. Our findings were inconsistent with the majority of literature from Western countries where residential density was positively associated with physical activity [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], but in line with our previous study conducted among urban Chinese adolescents in the same city [20].

In this study, the proportion of participants engaging in sufficient physical activity was 28.5% (442/1551), which was higher than the national average figure (22.2%) among Chinese urban adults officially reported by China Committee of Health and Family Planning in 2015 [34]. Therefore, low level of sufficient physical activity is a public health problem for Chinese people and physical activity promotion is in urgent need for China. Among those 422 participants who met the physical activity recommendations, the smallest number of persons within the categories of sufficient physical activity was 56 for women within the upper tertile of residential density. In the basis of statistical principle, such a minimal number of participants can warrant an acceptable statistical power in the data analysis. So there would be no marked adverse impact on statistical power caused by the number of participants with sufficient physical activity in our study.

Interestingly, the selected individual-level potential confounders (socio-demographic characteristics and anthropometric measures) exerted little influence on the RD-PA relationship, but the community-level factors (green space and potential neighborhood-level clustering effects) substantially mediated the RD-PA association in our study. This suggested that neighborhood-level factors might exert more important impact on local residents’ physical activity than participants’ personal socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics. Moreover, those neighborhood-level factors markedly mediated the RD-PA relationship for women but not for men, which implied that women’ engagement in physical activity might be more easily influenced by local neighborhood-level factors relative to men. Thus, neighborhood-level covariates should be put into consideration in future studies regarding neighborhood built environment and physical activity.

The mechanisms behind RD-PA link are complicated. The most important potential explanation widely used is that an area with higher residential density, usually meaning more diverse land use and closer destinations, has more recreational facilities (stores, parks, transport stops, sport facilities, etc.) available for local residents. Thus, local residents tend to physically visit those neighborhood-around facilities or destinations by walk or bicycle [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18], which results in that residents within higher densed neighborhoods are more likely to be physically active than their counterparts from lower densed areas. This mechanism is able to easily explain the positive association between RD and PA in Western countries, but can not explain the negative RD-PA link observed in this study.

It needs to note that the mean value of residential density within Nanjing urban areas was 9267 persons/km2 in 2016 [19, 27], which is unbelievably higher than that in typical urban areas of American or Australian cities where PA-related built environment attributes have been identified [35, 36]. For example, the mean residential density was 1210 persons/km2 in Atlanta, USA in 2010 [37]. In epidemiological studies regarding residential density and health conditions in Western communities, an area with ≥500 persons/km2 was usually classified as densely populated [38]. Based on this cutoff (500 persons/km2), RD was dichotomized as “high density” or “low density” in studies examining RD-PA relationship in Western societies, while RD was tertiled into three subgroups in our study. Furthermore, such an area with population of 500+ persons/km2 in Western societies might be a sparsely populated community in China. In our study, the cutoffs were 29.8 thousands and 56.5 thousands residents/km2 for middle and upper tertile, respectively. Even the population density within the lower tertile in our study was still much higher than 500 persons/km2, the cutoff for high residential density in Western countries. Thus, these may be the important factors contributing to the different scenarios of RD-PA relationship in China and Western countries.

The RD-PA relationship among adults in this study was in line with that observed within adolescents in the same urban areas in Nanjing [20]. For either adults or adolescents, RD was negatively associated with PA in urban areas of Nanjing. In those two studies, RD-PA association was examined using RD as tertiles and PA as binary variable (“sufficient” or “insufficient”). The consistent findings from those two studies suggested that RD might have similar influence on residents’ physical activity irrespective of their age in urban areas of regional China.

There was a possible explanation on such an inverse association between residential density and physical activity observed in China. One important potential inhibitor to outdoor physical activity may be roads/streets and traffic volume around neighborhoods. For those neighborhoods with high-enough population density in mega-cities like our study city, the roads/streets around neighborhoods are typically narrow and/or crowded with traffic which implying not sufficiently safe, even if not unsafe, for outdoor activities. Therefore, local residents within such highly-densed neighborhoods might not be willing to take the potential risk to do outdoor physical activities. People might choose to stay at home instead to visit parks or some places with physical activity facilities by walking a little bit long distance under such unsafe traffic-related circumstance. This might, at least in part, explain that the very population-densed urban environment may inhibit physical activity observed in our city. However the mechanisms behind RD-PA relationship are really complex and need to be further investigated with well-designed programs in future.

Regarding the strengths of this study, it is the first study reporting RD-PA relationship among urban adults from a rapidly urbanizing region in China. In this study RD was used as tertiles not dichotomous variables, which was more informative and allowed us to look at a gradient RD-PA association. The second strength is that, in addition to conventional confounders (including green public space), community-level potential clustering-effects were also considered using mixed-effects regression models. Finally, an interesting finding, a negative RD-PA association, was examined among urban adults, which was consistent with that in our previous study among Chinese urban adolescents, but not in line with those reported from Western communities, implying complex mechanisms behind the RD-PA link and suggesting further well-designed studies needed in different countries.

Several limitations also need to be noted. First, the RD-PA link did not imply any causality as it was observed from a cross-sectional study. Second, information on PA was self-reported by participants, which might cause potential recall bias, although the PA questionnaire has been validated and widely used to collect PA data in epidemiological surveys [39, 40]. Finally, although socio-demographic characteristics, public green space and community-level cluster-effects were controlled for in our analysis, some other potential confounders could not be considered due to data limitation. Therefore, considering these limitations of this study, the findings shall be prudently interpreted, and well-designed longitudinal studies are in need to demonstrate the influence of residential density on residents’ physical activity in future.

Conclusions

Residential density is, in gradient, negatively associated with sufficient physical activity for urban adults in regional China. It has public health implications for China to help residents’ promote and maintain physical activity through planning and constructing PA−/health-friendly built environment in future.

Availability of data and materials

The related data and material will be available upon request to either of the two corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

BE:

Built environment

BEACH-Adults:

The Built Environment and Chronic Health Conditions: Adults

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

IPAQ-CHN:

The Chinese version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire

OR:

Odds ratio

PA:

Physical activity

PANES-CHN:

The Chinese version of Physical Activity Neighborhood Environment Scale

RD:

Residential density

References

  1. 1.

    National Bureau of Statistics of People's Republic of China. Statistical Yearbook of China 2017. Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2017/indexch.htm. Accessed on 17 June 2018.

  2. 2.

    Xi B, Liang Y, He T, Reilly KH, Hu Y, Wang Q, Yan Y, Mi J. Secular trends in the prevalence of general and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults, 1993-2009. Obes Rev. 2012;13:287–96.

  3. 3.

    Ng SW, Howard AG, Wang HJ, Su C, Zhang B. The physical activity transition among adults in China: 1991-2011. Obes Rev. 2014;15(S1):27–36.

  4. 4.

    Giles-Corti B, Vernez-Moudon A, Reis R, Turrell G, Dannenberg AL, Badland H, Foster S, Lowe M, Sallis JF, Stevenson M, Owen N. City planning and population health: a global challenge. Lancet. 2016;388:2912–24.

  5. 5.

    Stevenson M, Thompson J, de Sá TH, Ewing R, Mohan D, McClure R, Roberts I, Tiwari G, Giles-Corti B, Sun X, Wallace M, Woodcock J. Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities. Lancet. 2016;388:2925–35.

  6. 6.

    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25:80–91.

  7. 7.

    Owen N, Humpel N, Leslie E, Bauman A, Sallis JF. Understanding environmental influences on walking: review and research agenda. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:67–76.

  8. 8.

    Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Schmitz KH, Hearst M. Does residential density increase walking and other physical activity? Urban Stud. 2007;44:679–97.

  9. 9.

    Frank LD. Land use and transportation interaction: implications on public health quality and quality of life. J Planning Educ Res. 2000;20:6–22.

  10. 10.

    Cervero R, Kockelman KM. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 1997;2:199–219.

  11. 11.

    Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD, Cain KL, Conway TL, Chapman JE, Slymen DJ, Kerr J. Neighborhood environment and psychosocial correlates of adults' physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:637–46.

  12. 12.

    McCormack GR, Shiell A. In search of causality: a systematic review of the relationship between the built environment and physical activity among adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:125.

  13. 13.

    Hajna S, Ross NA, Brazeau AS, Bélisle P, Joseph L, Dasgupta K. Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:768.

  14. 14.

    Ewing R, Cervero R. Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J Am Plann Assoc. 2010;76:265–94.

  15. 15.

    Van Holle V, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, Goubert L, Maes L, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:807.

  16. 16.

    Forsyth A, Oakes JM, Lee B, Schmitz KH. The built environment, walking, and physical activity: is the environment more important to some people than others? Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ. 2009;14:42–9.

  17. 17.

    Chaudhury H, Mahmood A, Michael YL, Campo M, Hay K. The influence of neighborhood residential density, physical and social environments on older adults’ physical activity: an exploratory study in two metropolitan areas. J Aging Stud. 2012;26:35–43.

  18. 18.

    Saelens BE, Handy SL. Built environment correlates of walking: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:S550–66.

  19. 19.

    Nanjing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Nanjing 2017. Available at: http://221.226.86.104/file/nj2004/2017/renkou/3–8.htm. Accessed on 17 June 2018.

  20. 20.

    Xu F, Li JQ, Liang YQ, Wang ZY, Hong X, Ware R, Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Associations of residential density with adolescents' physical activity in a rapidly-urbanizing area of mainland China. J Urban Health. 2010;87:44–53.

  21. 21.

    Xu F, Li JQ, Liang YQ, Wang ZY, Hong X, Ware RS, Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Residential density and adolescent overweight in a rapidly-Urbanising region of mainland China. JECH. 2010;64(11):1017–21.

  22. 22.

    Zhao L, Wang ZY, Qin ZZ, Leslie E, He J, Xiong YQ, Xu F. Test-retest reliability of physical activity neighborhood environment scale among urban men and women in Nanjing, China. Public Health. 2018;156:1–7.

  23. 23.

    Wang N, Wang ZY, Qin ZZ, Ye Q, Jia P, Xu Z, Xiong YQ, Xu F. Residential density was negatively associated with excess body weight among adults in an urban region of China. PLoS One. 2019;14(7):e0219314.

  24. 24.

    Qu NN, Li KJ. Study on the reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire. Chin J Epidemiol. 2004;25:265–8.

  25. 25.

    Deng HB, Macfarlane DJ, Thomas GN, Lao XQ, Jiang CQ, Cheng KK, Lam TH. Reliability and validity of the IPAQ–Chinese: the Guangzhou biobank cohort study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40:303–7.

  26. 26.

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Washington, DC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.

  27. 27.

    Nanjing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Nanjing 2017. Available at: http://221.226.86.104/file/nj2004/2017/zonghe/1–1.htm. Accessed on 17 June 2018.

  28. 28.

    Sabia S, van Hees VT, Shipley MJ, Trenell MI, Hagger-Johnson G, Elbaz A, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Association between questionnaire- and accelerometer-assessed physical activity: the role of sociodemographic factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(6):781–90.

  29. 29.

    Hankonen N, Heino MT, Kujala E, Hynynen ST, Absetz P, Araújo-Soares V, Borodulin K, Haukkala A. What explains the socioeconomic status gap in activity? Educational differences in determinants of physical activity and screentime. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):144.

  30. 30.

    Ekelund U, Kolle E, Steene-Johannessen J, Dalene KE, Nilsen AKO, Anderssen SA, Hansen BH. Objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity and associations with body weightgain: does body weight determine a decline in moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity? Int J Obes (Lond). 2017;41(12):1769–74.

  31. 31.

    Kondo MC, Fluehr JM, McKeon T, Branas CC. Urban green space and its impact on human health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):445.

  32. 32.

    Division of Disease Control, Ministry of Health of the people’s republic of China. The guideline for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2006.

  33. 33.

    Nanjing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. Statistical yearbook of Nanjing 2017. Available at: http://221.226.86.104/file/nj2004/2017/chengxiangjianshe/16–6.htm. Accessed on 17 June 2018.

  34. 34.

    Disease Control Division, China Committee of Health and Family Planning. Nutrition and Chronic Diseases for Chinese People. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2015.

  35. 35.

    Frank LD, Andresen MA, Schmid TL. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:87–96.

  36. 36.

    Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, , duToit L, Coffee N, Frank LD, Bauman AE, Hugo G, Saelens BE, Sallis JF. Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am J Prev Med 2007; 33: 387–395.

  37. 37.

    U.S. Census Bureau. American FactFinder. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US13&-_box_head_nbr=GCT-PH1&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-format=ST-7. Accessed on 17 June 2018.

  38. 38.

    Alexander FE, Boyle P, Carli PM, Coebergh JW, Ekbom A, Levi F, McKinney PA, McWhirter W, Michaelis J, Peris-Bonet R, Petridou E, Pompe-Kirn V, Plĕsko I, Pukkala E, Rahu M, Stiller CA, Storm H, Terracini B, Vatten L, Wray N. Population density and childhood leukaemia: results of the EUROCLUS study. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:439–44.

  39. 39.

    Li F, Fisher KJ, Brownson RC, Bosworth M. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. JECH. 2005;59:558–64.

  40. 40.

    Welk GJ. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Champaign: Human Kinetics; 2002.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our thanks go to the staffs and workers from Qinhuai and Yuhuatai District Center for Disease Control and Prevention for their assistance in collecting data.

Funding

The study design, data collection and management were supported by Nanjing Medical Science and technique Development Foundation (QRX11038), China (Recipient: Prof. Fei Xu), while data analysis, interpretation and manuscript writing were supported by a Program Grant (JSKXKT2018) from Jiangsu Province Association of Science and Technology, China (Recipient: Prof. Yaqiong Xiong).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhiyong Wang and Fei Xu contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China

    • Zhiyong Wang
    • , Zhenzhen Qin
    • , Qing Ye
    •  & Fei Xu

  2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China

    • Jing He

  3. School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

    • Yuyang Ma
    •  & Fei Xu

  4. Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 30 Rd. Luojia, Nanjing, 210024, People’s Republic of China

    • Yaqing Xiong

  5. Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    • Fei Xu

  6. International Initiative on Spatial Lifecourse Epidemiology, Enschede, The Netherlands

    • Fei Xu

Authors

  1. Search for Zhiyong Wang in:

  2. Search for Zhenzhen Qin in:

  3. Search for Jing He in:

  4. Search for Yuyang Ma in:

  5. Search for Qing Ye in:

  6. Search for Yaqing Xiong in:

  7. Search for Fei Xu in:

Contributions

Conceived, designed and directed the study: FX (the PI), ZW and YX (the Co-PI). Performed the experiments: ZW, ZQ, QY and FX. Analyzed the data: ZW, ZQ and FX. Wrote the article: ZW, ZQ, JH, YM, QY, YX and FX. Critical revision of the manuscript: ZW, ZQ, JH, YM, QY, YX and FX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaqing Xiong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Academic and Ethical Committee of Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention approved this study. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before our survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Prof. Fei Xu is an Associate Editor of BMC Public Health. No other competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Qin, Z., He, J. et al. The association between residential density and physical activity among urban adults in regional China. BMC Public Health 19, 1279 (2019) doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7593-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Built environment
  • China
  • Residential density
  • Physical activity

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us