Skip to main content


  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Oral health knowledge, attitudes and care practices of people with diabetes: a systematic review

BMC Public Health201818:577

  • Received: 3 October 2017
  • Accepted: 19 April 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports



People with uncontrolled diabetes are at greater risk for several oral health problems, particularly periodontal (gum) disease. Periodontal disease also impacts diabetes control. Good oral hygiene and regular dental visits are recommended to prevent and manage oral health problems. Several studies have been conducted to assess the oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of people with diabetes yet a review of these findings has not yet been undertaken. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize current evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with diabetes in relation to their oral health care.


A systematic search of all literature was carried out in five databases using key search terms. The inclusion criteria were: 1) published in the English language; 2) from 2000 to November, 2017; 3) conducted on persons with any type of diabetes and of all ages; 4) explored at least one study outcome (knowledge or attitude or practices toward oral health care); and 5) used quantitative methods of data collection. No restrictions were placed on the quality and setting of the study.


A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included a total of 27,894 people with diabetes and were conducted in 14 countries. The review found that people with diabetes have inadequate oral health knowledge, poor oral health attitudes, and fewer dental visits. They rarely receive oral health education and dental referrals from their care providers. Provision of oral health education by diabetes care providers and referral to dentists when required, was associated with improved oral health behaviours among patients.


Overall, people with diabetes have limited oral health knowledge and poor oral health behaviours. It is therefore essential to educate patients about their increased risk for oral health problems, motivate them for good oral health behaviours and facilitate access to dental care.


  • Oral health
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Health knowledge, attitudes, practice
  • Review


In 2014, it was estimated that 422 million adults were living with diabetes mellitus (DM) worldwide [1]. The global prevalence of diabetes in the adult population has nearly doubled since 1980, rising from 4.7% to 8.5% [1]. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of metabolic disorders that leads to hyperglycaemia and is classified into four general categories: type 1, type 2, gestational diabetes and other specific types of diabetes [2].

Hyperglycaemia can cause several complications related to different organ systems especially the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood vessels [1]. Although not commonly discussed in diabetes care, people with uncontrolled diabetes are also at increased risk of developing oral health problems, particularly periodontal (gum) disease [3]. Periodontal disease, which includes both gingivitis and periodontitis, is a common inflammatory disorder caused by pathogenic microflora in the biofilm that forms adjacent to the teeth on a daily basis [4]. Gingivitis is the mildest form of periodontal disease in which inflammation is confined to the gingiva, and can be reversible with effective oral hygiene while periodontitis is the advanced stage where the inflammation extends deep into the tissues and causes loss of supporting connective tissue and alveolar bone [4]. Tissue destruction in periodontitis results in breakdown of collagen fibres of the periodontal ligament and leads to the formation of periodontal pockets between the gingiva and the tooth. Periodontitis is a slowly progressing disease but the tissue destruction is largely irreversible [4, 5]. Further, the bacteria located within the periodontal pockets are pathogenic and highly inflammatory with some having the ability to survive in the blood stream and infect other areas of the body [6, 7]. Moderate periodontitis affects approximately 40–60% of the adults worldwide [8].

It is well established that diabetes and periodontitis are directly related. Hyperglycaemia affects periodontal outcomes and periodontitis also adversely affects blood glucose levels and worsens diabetes complications. The mechanistic pathways that link diabetes and periodontitis is not clearly understood in the absence of experimental findings from clinical studies [9]. However, current information supports the potential complex interaction involving aspects of inflammation, immune functioning, neutrophil activity, and cytokine biology [9]. Hyperglycaemia is believed to enhance levels of several cytokines and mediators in saliva and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), oxidative stress in periodontal tissues and formation of Advanced Glycation Endproducts (AGE). The AGE–RAGE (Receptor for AGE) interaction leads to the exaggerated inflammatory response and periodontal tissue destruction seen in diabetes [8]. Similarly, periodontitis promotes measures of systemic oxidative stress and raises serum levels of C-reactive protein and other acute-phase reactants and biomarkers of oxidative stress. Non-resolving chronic inflammation derived from periodontal disease also impacts on diabetes control (elevated HbA1C) and complications [8]. In light of this, current evidence from interventional studies suggests that periodontal treatment can improve blood glucose control [8, 1012], although this evidence is often considered low quality [12] due to the heterogeneity of the studies and small sample size [13, 14].

Considering the impact of periodontal disease on diabetes and benefits of good oral health practices to minimise the risk of periodontal disease, it is important to ensure that people with diabetes are motivated to engage in good oral hygiene behaviours and are provided risk assessment and dental referrals as a part of routine diabetes care [1517]. Several studies conducted worldwide have assessed the knowledge, attitude and practices of people with diabetes relating to oral health care, however, synthesis of these results has not yet been undertaken. Conducting such a review is important as adequate oral health knowledge or literacy is positively associated with good oral health behaviours such as, increased frequency of brushing and dental visits [18] and good periodontal health [19]. Further, oral health behaviours are influenced by the social determinants of health [20], Those who are disadvantaged or from lower socio economic groups often have unhealthy habits, poor knowledge and attitudes to oral health and uptake of dental services and therefore are more likely to suffer from the burden of oral disease [20]. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to synthesize current evidence on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with diabetes in relation to their oral health care.


This study used the PRISMA statement as a basis for reporting the systematic review findings [21, 22]. The protocol for this systematic review was not registered.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All studies which met the following inclusion criteria: 1) published in the English language; 2) from 2000 to November, 2017; 3) conducted on persons with any type of diabetes and of all ages; 4) explored at least one study outcome (knowledge or attitude or practices toward oral health care); and 5) used quantitative methods of data collection, were included in this review. Intervention studies that contained baseline data on any of the study outcomes were also included. No restrictions were placed on the quality and setting of the study.

Data sources, search strategy and study selection

A systematic literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane and Embase. The keywords used in the search were: diabetes mellitus, diabetic patients, people with diabetes, oral health, dental health, oral hygiene, dental care, dental visit, knowledge, awareness, attitudes, perception, practice. Considering the database specific indexing terms, individual search strategies were used for each database. Combinations of search terms were used, including ‘Boolean’ operators (And/Or) and MeSH (Medical Subject Heading) terms. A university librarian was consulted to ensure the search strategies were appropriate and correct. The complete electronic search strategy used in Medline is presented as a supplementary file (see Additional file 1). The filter applied in the search included the language (English) and date of publication (2000–2017). A final search was carried out on 30 November 2017 to ensure the most recent literature was included in this review. In addition, the reference lists and bibliographies of all relevant studies were searched for additional sources.

The results from the search were organised and duplicate references were removed using the Endnote bibliographic software. The title and abstract of the remaining studies were assessed by two experienced authors independently [PP (MA, MPH) & AG (MPH, PhD)] using the inclusion and exclusion criteria for suitability. In the case where it was difficult to make a decision on the basis of the title and abstract only, the full text was obtained for further assessment. Discrepancies in judgment were resolved through consultation with a third author (AA). A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow chart of the study selection process

Quality assessment and data extraction

Two reviewers (PP & AG) independently appraised the methodological quality of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for analytic cross sectional studies [23] (see Additional file 2). The quality of the data was scored assigning 1 point for each applicable item with the maximum score of 8. A third author (AA) was used to reconcile any discrepancies. The scoring of each paper was calculated as percentage and the quality was rated as *** or good (with a score of 80–100%), ** or fair (50–79%), and * or low (< 50%) [24]. No articles were rejected based on quality appraisal alone.

A data extraction form was developed and piloted independently by two authors (PP & AG) and modified as required (see Additional file 3). The information including author, year of publication, country, characteristics of sample/questionnaire and key outcome items was extracted by one author (PP) and checked by two others (AA & AG) for accuracy and completeness of the results. There was clear heterogeneity among the studies in their approaches to measuring and reporting the knowledge, attitudes, and practices in relation to oral health care. Therefore descriptive analysis was carried out in most sections and data was pooled to calculate mean percentage wherever studies had similar outcome items to compare.

Definition of terms

The term ‘people with diabetes’ has been used throughout the paper to include patients with any type of diabetes and of any ages. The ‘knowledge’ is used to include awareness and understanding of the people with diabetes relating to oral health-diabetes link, awareness about oral health complications and importance of diabetes control to minimise oral health risks. Similarly, ‘attitude’ is used to report perception and beliefs of the people with diabetes regarding oral health-diabetes relationship, oral health quality of life, and barriers in accessing oral care practices. The term ‘diabetes care providers’ refers to the diabetes healthcare team other than oral health professionals, which includes general practitioners, endocrinologists, diabetes educators, dietitians, physiotherapists and exercise physiologists.


All studies (n = 28) used a cross sectional design (including a intervention study) to capture the information on the knowledge, attitude and practices of patients in relation to oral health care. Of these, 4 studies used existing data or followed up participants previously included in state and national surveys [2528]. The studies originated from 14 countries namely, United States of America (USA; n = 8), India (n = 5), Saudi Arabia (n = 2), Malaysia (n = 2), Pakistan (n = 2), United Kingdom (UK; n = 1), Sweden (n = 1), Ireland (n = 1), Finland (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1), United Arab Emirates (UAE; n = 1), Jordon (1) South Korea (n = 1) and Iran (n = 1). The sample size of the studies ranged from 50 to 12,405 participants with a total of 27,894 people with diabetes. Three studies surveyed the participants with type 1 DM [2931], 6 involved participants with type 2 DM [3237] and the remaining included both types of DM as well as people with unknown type of DM (Table 1). A variety of questionaries were used to assess oral health knowledge, attitude, and care practices of people with diabetes. Only 9 studies used a validated questionnaire or items, while remaining did not provide any clear information in this area. The questionnaires included in the studies contained items ranging from 4 to 40. Of the total studies, 4 were rated as good quality (score ≥ 80), 23 fair (score 50–79%) and the remaining as low quality (score <  50%) (see Additional file 2).
Table 1

Summary of the included studies with main results

Author, Year, Country

Sample/ Questionnaire characteristics


Quality Rating

Yuen et al. 2009, USA [18]

253 (T1DM and T2DM); ≥18y/

20-Q; V


▪ OH~DM: 47%

▪ Adequate OH knowledge significantly associated with brushing (twice/day), flossing (once/day), and dental visit (twice/year) (P < 0.01)

▪ Receiving OH information significantly associated with adequate OH knowledge (P = 0.008)



▪ Brushing: 61.2%

▪ Flossing: 34.9%; never: 35.3%

▪ Dental visit: 58.6%

Tomar et al. 2000, USA [25]

N = 4570 (DM), 101,148 (NDM); ≥25 y/

4-Q; V


▪ Reasons behind not visiting dentists: perceived need to visit a dentist (37.2%), cost (28.6%), fear/anxiety (10.5%), and other reasons (23.7%)



▪ Dental visit: PWD 65.8% vs NDM 73.1% (P = 0.0000); result was consistent even after controlling confounders and other correlates: sex, age, race or ethnicity, educational attainment, income, and dental insurance coverage (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93)

Macek et al.,2008, USA [26]

N = 725 (DM), 7816 (NDM); ≥25 y


▪ Dental visit: 56.8% PWD vs 64.7% NDM; result remain consistent even after adjusting periodontitis status, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status and dental insurance status


Moffet. 2010, USA [27]

N = 12,405 (DM)

Q: V


▪ Dental visit: 77% of patients (82% with dental insurance vs 61% without dental insurance (age sex adjusted OR 2.66, 95%CI 2.33–3.0).


Oh et al. 2012, USA [28]

N = 1209 (DM) 9140 (NDM); ≥45 y


▪ Dental visit: 72.7% PWD vs 83.5% NDM (95% CI: 82.6%–84.4%, p < .0001)

▪ Diabetes status adversely affected the rate of preventive dental care

▪ Adults from racial/ethnic minority background (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.79) or lower educational attainment (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.88) had lower odds of having received preventive dental care


Orlando, et al., 2010, USA [29]

N = 89 (T1DM);

12–19 y/



▪ Perio~DM; 44%

▪ Health care providers advised PWD for dental check up (77%)



▪ Care of their OH was as important as taking care of medical health: 49%

▪ Plaque or tartar build up was a problem: 33%


▪ Dental visit: 95.4%; majority (86.5%) paid through insurance

Moore et al. 2000, USA [30]

N = 390 (T1DM), 203 age matched (NDM)


▪ OH would be better if not have diabetes: 18.2%

▪ Health care providers advised for oral hygiene and dental visit: 27.1%



▪ PWD rated their overall oral health lower than control subjects

▪ The cost of dental care was main reason for avoiding routine visit


▪ Brushing: 72.2% PWD vs 80.2% NDM

▪ Flossing: 33% vs 30%

▪ Dental visit: 68.9% vs 75.7%

Alves et al., 2009, Brazil [31]

N = 55 (T1DM), 55 age matched (NDM)


▪ None enrolled in an oral health educational program

▪ Informed to visit dentist by health professional: 65.5%



▪ Reasons for avoiding dental visit: difficulty in scheduling an appointment (36.1%) and high treatment costs (27.8%)


▪ Brushing: 92.7% PWD vs 76.4% NDM

▪ Flossing: 30.9% vs 18.2%

▪ Dental visit: 63.8% vs. 48.7%

Arunkumar et al. 2015. India [32]

N = 185 (T2DM)


▪ Perio~DM: 33%

▪ Informed about OH from physicians; none


Kejriwal et al.2014, India [33]

N = 300 (T2DM);18-65y/

20-Q; V


▪ Increased risk for oral diseases: 50%

▪ Informed about OH from physicians: 10%



▪ Preferred to see physicians for oral problem: 41%


▪ Brushing: 65%

▪ Dental visit (in 6 months): 27%

Sandberg, et al.2001, Sweden [34]

N = 102 (T2DM), 102 age, gender matched (NDM); 34-77y


▪ OH~DM: 27%



▪ Perceived satisfaction with teeth and mouth: satisfied (83.3%), dissatisfied (16.7%)

▪ Main reason for avoiding dental visits: belief that it was not necessary



▪ Brushing: ≥ 1times: 91.3%

▪ Dental visit: 85.1% PWD vs 95.1% NDM (P < 0.05)

Lee et al. 2009, South Korea [35]

N = 75 (T2DM)


▪ 62.7% perceived their OH status as poor with 37.3% perceived as good



▪ Brushing: 90.6%

▪ Dental visit (within 6 months): 45.3%

Sahril et al. 2014, Malaysia [36]

N = 4017 (T2DM);

≥18 y


▪ OH~DM: 35.5%



▪ Wanted dental referral: 59.9%

▪ Reasons not wanting a referral: perceived lack of necessity, absence of dental problems and perception that dental problems were not serious


▪ Dental visit: 16.7%; highest among: 18–19 y, lowest: 70 yrs

Aggarwal et al. 2012, India [37]

N = 500 (T2DM); ≥35 y/


▪ OH~DM: 38.4%

▪ Never received a referral for dental care: 79.4%



▪ Avoiding dental visits due to unpleasant experience: 18.4%


▪ Brushing: 33.4%

▪ Dental visit: 75.6%; visited for regular dental checkups: 10.8%

Al Habashneh et al. 2010, Jordon [38]

N = 405 (DM); RR 81%



▪ Perio~DM: 47.7%; source of information: diabetes nurse (43%), physicians (38%), dentist (30%),



▪ Did not pay attention to bleeding gums: 13.7%

▪ Rated their overall oral health as poor: 60%


▪ Brushing: 28.1%

▪ Dental visit (regular): 10%

Allen et al., 2008, Ireland [39]

N = 101 (DM)


20-Q; V


▪ Perio~DM: 33%; source of information: dentist (51%), diabetes care providers (32%)



▪ Would choose to save a painful posterior tooth: 32%


▪ Dental visit: 42.5%; not attended for > 5 yrs.: 34%

Badiah et al. 2012. Malaysia [40]

N = 102 (DM)

RR 93%/

10-Q; V


▪ Perio~DM: 26.5%

▪ Needs to be extra careful on oral health practices: 19.6%

▪ Those who were aware of the risk and the need for extra oral health practice were more among those who brushed at least twice a day and regular attendees



▪ Brushing: 80.4%

▪ Dental visit (1-2y): 33.3%

Bahammam .2015, Saudi Arabia [41]

N = 454 (T1DM & T2DM); RR-87%.


▪ Perio~DM: 46.7%

▪ Gum disease makes it harder to control diabetes: 21.8%

▪ Participants who had regular dental visits had significantly greater awareness of the Perio~DM link (P < 0.05)



▪ Brushing: 26.8%,

▪ Flossing: occasional: 23.2%; never:73.6%

▪ Dental visit: 12.6%

Bowyer et al. 2011, UK [42]

N = 229 (T1DM & T2DM); ≥ 25 y;

RR 37.2%


▪ Aware of mouth dryness: 43%

▪ Never received any OH advice: 69.1%



▪ Reasons for avoiding dental visit: cost (43.9%), lack of need (37.6%) and unpleasant visit (19.1%)


▪ Brushing: 67.2%

▪ Flossing: 15.3%

▪ Dental visit: 85.2%

Kamath,net al.2015, India [43]

N = 137 DM

RR 90.6%


▪ Perio~DM: 22.5%



▪ Brushing: 33.3%

▪ Dental visit: 27.5%

Mirza et al. 2007, Pakistan [44]

N = 240 (T1DM & T2DM)/



▪ Aware about OH complications: 35.4%

▪ OH Knowledge was significantly related to brushing frequency (p = 0.005) as counselled patients brushed more frequently than uncounselled (53.4% vs 22.3%)



▪ Denied of DM~OH: 7.6%

▪ If advised about their predisposition to oral disease, willing to increase brushing frequency (45%) and consult a dentist (23%). Nevertheless, some (31.5%) were not reluctant to change


▪ Brushing: 24%

Sadeghi et al. 2014, Iran [45]

N = 200 (DM)

Q; V


▪ OH~DM: 36.5%; source of information: dentist (65%), physicians (35%)



▪ Brushing: 7%; no brushing: 49.5%

▪ Dental visits: 83%

Al Amassi et al.2017, Saudi Arabia [46]

N = 278 (DM); 18 -64y/



▪ Perio~DM: 75.9%; source of information: media (31%), dentist (23%), physicians (21%)

▪ Controlling diabetes is important to minimize OH complications: 74.4%

▪ Patients with higher levels of education had greater awareness of the increased risk of OH problems and had better oral hygiene practices than those with lower levels of education (p < 0.05)



▪ Brushing: 19.1%

▪ Regular dental visit: 15.1%

Bangash et al. 2011, Pakistan [47]

300 (T1DM & T2DM)/



▪ DM~OH: 64%; source of information: physicians (35%) and dentists (65%)



▪ Denied existence of a link OH~DM: 23%

▪ Would increase brushing frequency if told of their predisposition to oral disease: 30%


▪ Brushing: 86%

Ummadisetty et al. 2016, India [48]

N = 60 (DM),143 (NDM); 40-55y/



▪ Perio~DM: 61.7%; source of information: physicians (36.6%) and dentist (30.69%)

▪ Physicians advised to visit a dentist: 46%


Eldarrat. 2011, UAE [49]

N = 100 (DM)

RR 50%


▪ Perio~DM: 60%



▪ Main reason of dental visit: due to pain/discomfort


▪ Brushing: 31%; did not brush daily: 19%

▪ Flossing: once a day: 11%; never: 66%

▪ Dental visit: 40%

Karikosk et al. 2002, Finland [50]

N = 336 (T2DM); 1 ≥ 18 y/



▪ Main reason for not seeing a dentist: not having any problems (95%)

▪ Important for the diabetes nurse to also offer advice about dental care: 92%



▪ Brushing: 38%

▪ Dental visit: 63%

Kanjirath,P.P, 2011, USA [52]

N = 77 (DM) and 366 (NDM)


▪ Brushing: 31.5% PWD vs 49% NDM

▪ Flossing: 19.4% vs 26.7.%

▪ Dental visit: 86.7% vs 82.2%


K Knowledge, A Attitudes, P Practices; Brushing ≥2times/day; Flossing≥1time/week; Dental visits: ≥1 time in the last 12 months; T1: Type 1; T2: Type 2; DM diabetes mellitus, NDM Non diabetes mellitus, y year, RR response rate, Q questionnaire/items, V validated questionnaire/items, Perio Periodontal disease, OH Oral health, PWD People with diabetes

aall or most of the criteria have been fulfilled (a score of 80–100%); bsome of the criteria have been fulfilled (50–79%); and cfew or none of the criteria have been fulfilled (< 50%) [24]

Oral health knowledge

The majority of studies (21/28) explored the oral health knowledge of people with diabetes. The knowledge items included in the studies assessed the level of information of the patients on the risk of oral health problems in relation to diabetes, importance of good diabetic control and preventive oral health behaviours (brushing, flossing and regular dental visits) to reduce the risk for oral health problems. Majority of the studies reported that more than half of people with diabetes were unaware of the link between diabetes and oral health and their increased risk for various oral health complications including periodontal disease [18, 2932, 34, 3645]. In contrast, few studies did show that most participants (type 1 DM and type 2 DM) had knowledge on the link and oral health risks and this information was received mainly from dentists, physicians, and media [4648]. Furthermore, some studies showed that those who were better informed or had good knowledge of the link between diabetes and oral health were more likely to adopt good oral health behaviours [4447]. However, two studies which included matched controls found that individuals with diabetes had lower oral health knowledge than those without diabetes [30, 31].

A survey conducted in the USA concluded that adequate oral health knowledge had a statistically significant relationship with the frequency of brushing (at least two times daily), flossing (at least once a day) and dental visits (at least two times a year) (p = < 0.01) [18]. Similarly, adequate oral health knowledge was also significantly associated with other factors such as, higher level of education (p = 0.05) [41] and having received oral health information (p = 0.008) [18, 46]. Studies reported that the majority of the patients did not receive any oral health information from general physicians or diabetes care providers [2933, 42, 46, 49]. However, few studies such as, those conducted in USA [29] and Brazil [31] indicated that majority (77 and 65.5% respectively) of patients were advised by health professionals for dental checkups [29].

Oral health attitudes

The attitudes of people with diabetes towards oral health were reported in 15 studies. The relevant attitude items related to perceived need and importance of oral health, self-rating of oral health status, agreement/disagreement on the link between diabetes and oral health, and reasons for refusing dental referrals/visits. Studies reported that the perceived need [42] and importance [39] of oral health care in relation to diabetes was poor among people with diabetes [39, 42]. Some studies revealed that patients with diabetes rated their overall oral health status as poor [35, 38] and this was lower compared to those without diabetes [30]. Comparison between nations revealed that participants from high income nations perceived their oral health status higher [30, 34] than those from low income nations [35, 38]. A study conducted in the USA showed that about half of the participants (49%) acknowledged that taking care of their oral health was as important as their general health, and only a third (33%) considered plaque or tartar build up as a problem [29]. Furthermore, some participants also denied that there was a link between diabetes and oral health [44, 47].

A survey conducted in Malaysia revealed that half (51%) of the people with diabetes believed teeth problems were not serious and this belief was one of the main reasons behind refusing a dental referral [36]. A number of reasons were highlighted by participants for not having regular dental visits, the most notable being the cost of dental care, lack of need for oral health care, absence of dental problems, unpleasant dental visits and difficulty in scheduling an appointment [30, 31, 36, 37, 42, 50]. The cost of dental care was the main underlying reason behind lower dental visits in studies from high income countries [30, 42] while the perceived lack of necessity, discomfort and fear of oral health care were the main reasons for the participants from low income countries [36, 37]. Generally, participants from low income countries had a tendency to see the dentist for urgent treatments only [37, 49]. Similarly, a study conducted in Ireland reported that 32% of the participants would choose to save a painful posterior tooth [39].

The low perceived need for dental care among participants was also attributed to their lack of oral health knowledge and information [44]. Nearly half of the participants (45%) from a study conducted in Pakistan stated that they would engage in more positive oral health practices if they were informed about the risks and consequences of poor oral health [44]. A study from Finland showed that almost all of participants (95%) were receptive to receive advice on oral health [50] from diabetes care providers. However, less than one third of participants (31%) from another study also stated that any oral health information provided would not affect their oral hygiene behaviours and dental checkups routines [44]. Similarly, some participants (41%) in a study conducted in India also preferred to consult physicians for oral problems [33].

Oral health care practices

Oral health care practices were reported in most of the studies (n = 25) and addressed the patients’ frequency of brushing, flossing, and dental visits. In the studies (n = 18) that reported frequency of brushing, just less than half of the participants who have diabetes (mean 49.3%, 95% CI 35.70–62.90) brushed twice a day [24, 2729, 31, 3337, 3942, 44, 45, 48]. Four studies presented data on regular flossing (≥1/day) by patients and only a quarter of them (mean 25.1%, 95% CI 10.36–39.88) undertook flossing at least once a day. Overwhelmingly, regular dental visits among the people with diabetes were also lower. Across 20 studies just over half of the people with diabetes (mean 54%, 95% CI 42.80–65.25) had dental visits in the last 12 months [2429, 31, 3337, 3945, 48]. In addition, the uptake of dental services was very low (mean 34.6%, range 10%–75.60%) in low or middle income countries [51], such as, India [33, 37, 43], Malaysia [36, 40] and, Jordan [38] compared with high income countries [51] (mean 60.6%, range 12.6%–95.4%), which included USA [18, 2527, 29, 52], UK [42], Finland [50], Sweden [34], Ireland [39], UAE [49], Saudi Arabia [41, 46] and Korea Republic [35]. Within the high income countries lower rate of dental visits was observed in Asian countries (range 12.6%–45.3%) [49] [41, 46] [35] which was similar to other low income countries (10%–45%), except the one study from India which reported a dental visit rate of 75.6% [37]. However, a study conducted in Ireland also showed a lower compliance of dental visits with only 43% of the participants visiting a dentist in the last year and 34% reported not attending a dentist for more than 5 years [25]. More than one third (37%) of patients with diabetes included in a Finnish study did not visit a dentist despite being entitled for state-subsidized dental care [50].

Furthermore, compared with age matched controls of subjects without diabetes, people with diabetes had a lower dental visit frequency (68.9% vs 75.7%) [30]. This result is consistent with another study involving a national sample (n = 4570) which also found that the people with diabetes were less likely to visit a dentist than those without diabetes (65.8 vs 73.1%, P = 0.0000) [25]. The pattern of visits remained unchanged even after controlling for confounders such as age, race or ethnicity, educational level, income level and dental insurance coverage (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93) [25]. A similar result was obtained from another study conducted in the USA, which used data from a national survey (56.8% Vs 64.7%, OR 0.72, 95%CI 0.53–0.96) [26]. In contrast, a study conducted in Brazil involving children with type 1 diabetes, reported that frequency of dental visits was found to be higher compared to matched control non diabetic children (63.8% vs 48.7%,) [29].

Receiving oral health information was found to have a significant impact in improving good oral health care practices among participants [18]. Studies found that participants who were advised by health professionals to have regular dental checkups and instructed on tooth brushing and flossing were more likely to visit a dentist once in a year (P = 0.002) and to brush and floss teeth at least twice daily (P = 0.006) [18]. Similar results were found in the study from Pakistan where the knowledge about oral complications provided by physicians was significantly associated with brushing frequency (P = 0.005), where 53.4% of counselled patients brushed twice or more daily compared to 22.3% patients who were not counselled [44].


The focus of this review was to provide a synthesis of current evidence on knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with diabetes in relation to their oral health care. The questionnaire and methods used to conduct surveys in this area were largely varied and hence the reliability of the studies included in this review may be compromised. More than half of the studies also failed to provide information about the validity of the tools used to measure knowledge, attitude and practices. Furthermore, almost all of the studies used convenience sampling and most did not report the response rate or any comparison between the respondents and non-respondents. Of the total studies included in this review only four were rated as of good quality.

Overall, the results of this review show that a majority of people with diabetes are unaware of the bidirectional link between diabetes and periodontal disease and they have limited knowledge of their risks for oral health problems [18, 2932, 34, 3645]. As could be expected, knowledge of oral health risks was found to be significantly associated with better oral health care and practices [18, 44]. However, a majority of people with diabetes did not receive information on oral health risks in relation to their diabetes or advice on oral health care from diabetes care providers [2933, 42, 46, 49]. This finding is similar to the results from a recent scoping review which explored the knowledge and practices of diabetes care providers in oral health care and found that they generally do not provide any information on oral health care to their patients in the diabetes care settings [17]. According to the review the main barriers facing diabetes care providers in this area include inadequate knowledge about the oral health-diabetes bidirectional relationship, unavailability of oral health assessment tools/guidelines and referral pathways for promoting oral health [17].

In spite of being at high risk for developing oral health problems, the perceived need and importance for oral health care among people with diabetes is found to be very poor [39, 42], as it appears oral health is not as important as general health for these patients [29, 36]. People with diabetes rated their overall oral health lower [35, 38] than that those without diabetes [30]. The cost of dental care, lack of dental care need, unpleasant dental visits, and difficulty in scheduling appointments were found to discourage people from seeking dental care [30, 31, 36, 37, 42, 50]. Despite these barriers, this review also found that people with diabetes are more likely to engage in positive health behaviours if they are informed about the risks and consequences of poor oral health. Patients were also found to be interested in receiving oral health information from diabetes care providers [50].

Most notably, people with diabetes were found to have poor compliance with oral hygiene behaviours and dental visits as less than half of the patients (49.3%) reported brushing twice a day. In addition, flossing of teeth appeared to be least important for patients with diabetes with only a quarter (25.1%) of the participants reported flossing their teeth everyday to clean interdental surfaces. Similarly, just over half (54%) of the people visited a dentist in the 12 months. Large national studies have also reported a lower frequency of dental visits among people with diabetes compared to those without diabetes [43, 49]. These figures are lower than the general population of some high income countries such as in England where a higher proportion of adults (aged 15 and over) brushed twice a day (75%) and visited dentist (73%) in the last 12 months [53]. Similarly, nearly two third of American (64% aged 18–64) [54] and Australian (60.3% aged 15 and over) [55] visited dentist in the past year [54]. This delay to seek dental care among people with diabetes is a significant concern considering periodontal disease can negatively impact on diabetes control and worsen diabetes complications [8].

This review has also identified various factors that could contribute to the poor oral health knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours among people with diabetes. One of the key factors is the limited oral health education and motivation being provided to these patients during diabetes care. It is apparent that oral health education can improve knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding oral health [56] and therefore it is very important to include it in diabetes patient education, which is a vital and integral component of successful diabetes care [57]. Such education should include aspects of good oral hygiene practices as these are important to prevent gingivitis (earlier stage of gum disease) and control of advanced periodontal lesions [58].

Another major barrier identified in this review is the cost of dental care, which is often cited as an issue among people with chronic conditions [59]. Treatment of oral health problems is often costly and has been a significant economic burden for many high income countries [60]. Similarly, accessible dental care services is also important considering the fact that a study from Sweden reported more than one third of people with diabetes did not visit the dentist despite being entitled for subsidised dental care. Similar results are also found in the general population in Australia where a national oral health survey reported that there were no significant differences in dental visit between adults eligible for public dental services and those who were not eligible (both 62%) [55]. Although it is not specified in the study from Sweden, it is possible that the lengthy waiting time to access in public/subsidised dental care services [59, 61] may deter people with diabetes from visiting a dentist. Therefore, the feasibility of setting up affordable and accessible dental referral pathways for people with diabetes also needs to be explored as such preventative initiatives could ultimately be more cost effective [62] than delaying dental treatment until severe oral complications have developed. Most importantly, the identification and treatment of periodontal disease is particularly relevant for this at risk population as it could potentially improve their diabetes control [1116]. However, strategies to improve the oral health of people with diabetes may need to be tailored to high and low income countries particularly since oral health is not a priority for patients in low income countries and dental problems are often left untreated [63]. Furthermore, there is insufficient emphasis on primary prevention of oral diseases and limited access to oral health care [63] in developing countries. In this context, population based preventive oral health programs could be more effective.

It is also important to consider that while diabetes care involves a multidisciplinary team including general practitioners, endocrinologists, diabetes educators, dietitians, podiatrist and physiotherapists, dentists are usually not included as part of this care team, despite the impact of poor oral health on diabetes control. Considering the findings of this review, both diabetes care providers and dentists have an excellent opportunity to collaborate and increase awareness among patients with diabetes of their increased risk of oral health problems and motivate them to have good oral hygiene behaviours and regular dental visits. The involvement of dentists in multidisciplinary teams has shown to have a positive impact in other clinical areas like antenatal care. For example, the Midwifery Initiated Oral Health (MIOH) program in Australia where dentists and midwives work in partnership has demonstrated a significant improvement in the oral health knowledge and confidence of midwives to promote oral health as well as the oral health knowledge, quality of life, uptake of dental services and oral health status of pregnant women [64, 65].

Implication of the findings

The results of this review have several implications for diabetes care providers, oral health professionals and policy makers. Diabetes care providers should play a more active role in promoting oral health among their patients. They should educate patients about their increased risk for oral health complications and advise them to have regular dental checkups. Diabetes care providers may also need to improve their own knowledge in this area in order to incorporate oral health promotion into their practice. Oral health professionals should inform people with diabetes about good oral health behaviours and emphasize the importance of good diabetes control in minimising oral health risks. In addition, policy makers need to develop and implement standardised oral health care guidelines and oral health promotional resources for diabetes care settings as well as create appropriate referral pathways to increase uptake of dental services for this at risk population.


The studies in the review vary in quality and have several common methodological limitations. These include: lack of reported response rates, varying questionnaires used to measure study outcomes; limited validated questionnaires and inadequate discussion of confounding factors that may have affected the findings (age, education, income level). Studies included were from both high and low income countries and therefore it is not known whether the different health care systems and cultural beliefs across these countries could have affected the knowledge, attitudes and practices of people with diabetes in relation to oral health care. Self-reported data from the studies also limit the generalisation of the findings. The systematic review undertaken also has limitations. The review did not look for unpublished articles as well as those published in other languages and hence there is a possibility that we may not have retrieved all studies in this area. There is also the possibility of outcome reporting bias. Future studies in this area need to be designed taking these limitations into consideration to ensure high quality evidence that is reproducible and generalizable.


This systematic review confirms that people with diabetes have inadequate oral health knowledge, poor oral health attitude, and lower compliance of recommended oral hygiene behaviours and dental visits. They are also not receiving adequate oral health information and care advice from diabetes care providers. It is important that people with diabetes are educated about their increased risk of oral health complications and encouraged to seek regular dental checkups. A multidisciplinary approach involving oral health professionals is needed to capacity build diabetes care providers to promote oral health and encourage their patients to seek dental care along with the establishment of appropriate and affordable dental referral pathways.



The authors would like to thank Ms. Georgena Bowmer for her assistance in developing search strategies and literature search.


This study was supported by Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend Scholarship (Doctor of Philosophy) through Western Sydney University

Availability of data and materials

All data provided in tables.

Authors’ contributions

PP developed the search strategy, performed the literature search, synthesis and interpretations. PP and AG conceived and designed the study and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. RG, VW, AA, JF and CK contributed to the manuscript preparation and editing of the different versions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia
Centre for Oral Health Outcomes, Research Translation and Evaluation (COHORTE), Ingham Institute Applied Medical Research, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool, 1871, NSW, Australia
Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Locked Bag 7103, Liverpool, 1871, NSW, Australia
South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, 2170, NSW, Australia
South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia
Oral Health Services and Sydney Dental Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Surry Hills, NSW, 2010, Australia
Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Sydney Medical School, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 1797, Australia
Health Focus Family Practice, The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), National Association of Diabetes Centres (NADC), Ingleburn, NSW, 2565, Australia
Diabetes , Obesity and Metabolism Translational Research Unit (DOMTRU), Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, 2560, Australia
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, NSW, Australia
Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia


  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global report on diabetes. World Health Organization. 2016. Accessed 26 Dec 2017.
  2. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl 1):S11–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Taylor GW, Borgnakke WS. Periodontal disease: associations with diabetes, glycemic control and complications. Oral Dis. 2008;14:191–203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet. 2005;366:1809–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Preshaw PM, Alba AL, Herrera D, Jepsen S, Konstantinidis A, Makrilakis K, et al. Periodontitis and diabetes: a two-way relationship. Diabetologia. 2012;55:21–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Loesche WJ, Lopatin DE. Interactions between periodontal disease, medical diseases and immunity in the older individual. Periodontology 2000. 1998;16:80–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Watts A, Crimmins EM, Gatz M. Inflammation as a potential mediator for the association between periodontal disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2008;4:865.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapple ILC, Genco R, and on behalf of working group 2 of the joint EFP/AAP workshop. Diabetes and periodontal diseases: consensus report of the joint EFP/AAP workshop on periodontitis and systemic diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40 Suppl. 14:S106–12.Google Scholar
  9. Taylor JJ, Preshaw PM, Lalla EA. Review of the evidence for pathogenic mechanisms that may link periodontitis and diabetes. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(Suppl 14):S113–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Engebretson S, Kocher T. Evidence that periodontal treatment improves diabetes outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40 Suppl 14:S153–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang X, Han X, Guo X, Luo X, Wang D. The effect of periodontal treatment on hemoglobin A1c levels of diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e108412.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Simpson TC, Weldon JC, Worthington HV, Needleman I, Wild SH, Moles DR, et al. Treatment of periodontal disease for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;11:CD004714.Google Scholar
  13. Faggion CM, Cullinan MP, Atieh M. An overview of systematic reviews on the effectiveness of periodontal treatment to improve glycaemic control. J Periodont Res. 2016;51:716–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Botero JE, Rodríguez C, Agudelo-Suarez AA. Periodontal treatment and glycaemic control in patients with diabetes and periodontitis: an umbrella review. Aust Dent J. 2016;61:134–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines Task Force. IDF Guideline on oral health for people with diabetes. 2009. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  16. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. General practice management of type 2 diabetes 2016–18: 2016. Accessed 20 Sept 2017.
  17. Poudel P, Griffiths R, Wong VW, Arora A, George A. Knowledge and practices of diabetes care providers in oral health care and their potential role in oral health promotion: a scoping review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;130:266–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yuen HK, Wolf BJ, Bandyopadhyay D, Magruder KM, Salinas CF, London SD. Oral health knowledge and behavior among adults with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009;86(3):239–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Wehmeyer MM, Corwin CL, Guthmiller JM, Lee JY. The impact of oral health literacy on periodontal health status. J Public Health Dent. 2014;74(1):80–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Petersen PE, Kwan S. Equity, Social determinants and public health programmes–the case of oral health. Community dentistry and oral epidemiology. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39:481–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. The Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. 2016. Accessed 12 May 2017.
  24. Goldsmith MR, Bankhead CR, Austoker J. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative research in evidence based patient information. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:262–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomar SL, Lester A. Dental and other health care visits among US adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Macek MD, Tomar SL. Dental care visits among dentate adults with diabetes and periodontitis. J Public Health Dent. 2009;69(4):284–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffet HH, Schillinger D, Weintraub JA, et al. Social disparities in dental insurance and annual dental visits among medically insured patients with diabetes: the diabetes study of northern California (DISTANCE) survey. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;7(3):A57.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Oh J, Gjelsvik A, Fuller D, Walsh E, Paine V, Leonard L. Less than optimal dental care among Rhode Island adults with diabetes: the need to assure oral health Care for all Adults with diabetes. Med Health R I. 2012;95(3):91–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Orlando VA, Johnson LR, Wilson AR, Maahs DM, Wadwa RP, Bishop FK, et al. Oral health knowledge and behaviors among adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:942124.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore PA, Orchard T, Guggenheimer J, Weyant RJ. Diabetes and oral health promotion: a survey of disease prevention behaviors. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:1333–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Alves C, Brandão M, Andion J, Menezes R. Oral health knowledge and habits in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Braz Dent J. 2009;20:70–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Arunkumar S, Amur S, Sambrani U, Burde KM. Survey on awareness and knowledge about the effect of diabetes mellitus on systemic and oral health in patients visiting general medicine outpatient Department in Dental Hospital. J Krishna Inst Med Sci. 2015;4(2):100–6.Google Scholar
  33. Kejriwal SR, Bhandary R, Thomas B. Assessment of knowledge and attitude of diabetes mellitus type 2 patients about their oral health in Mangalore, India. Univ Res J Dent. 2014;4:44–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandberg GE, Sundberg HE, Wikblad KF. A controlled study of oral self-care and self-perceived oral health in type 2 diabetic patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2001;59:28–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee H-K, Choi S-H, Won KC, Merchant AT, Song K-B, Jeong S-H, et al. The effect of intensive oral hygiene care on gingivitis and periodontal destruction in type 2 diabetic patients. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:529–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Sahril N, Aris T, Asari AS, Yaw SL, Saleh NC, Omar MA, et al. Oral health seeking behaviour among Malaysians with type II diabetes. J Public Health Aspects. 2014;1(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  37. Aggarwal A, Panat SR. Oral health behavior and HbA1c in Indian adults with type 2 diabetes. J Oral Sci. 2012;54:293–301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Al Habashneh R, Khader Y, Hammad MM, Almuradi M. Knowledge and awareness about diabetes and periodontal health among Jordanians. J Diabetes Complicat. 2010;24:409–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Allen EM, Ziada HM, O’Halloran D, Clerehugh V, Allen PF. Attitudes, awareness and oral health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(3):218–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Badiah B. A preliminary survey on awareness of periodontal risk and oral health practices among diabetic patients in hospital Kuala Lumpur. Malaysian Dent J. 2012;34(1):1–7.Google Scholar
  41. Bahammam MA. Periodontal health and diabetes awareness among Saudi diabetes patients. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:225–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Bowyer V, Sutcliffe P, Ireland R, Lindenmeyer A, Gadsby R, Graveney M, et al. Oral health awareness in adult patients with diabetes: a questionnaire study. Br Dent J. 2011;211:E12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Kamath DG, Nayak SU, Pai KK, Shenoy R. Knowledge and awareness of oral health among diabetic patients—a cross-sectional study from Mangalore City. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2015;5:71–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Mirza KM, Khan AA, Ali MM, Chaudhry S. Oral health knowledge, attitude, and practices and sources of information for diabetic patients in Lahore, Pakistan. Diabetes Care. 2007;12(30):3046–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Sadeghi R, Taleghani F, Farhadi S. Oral health related quality of life in diabetic patients. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014;8(4):230–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Al Amassi BY, Al Dakheel RS. Oral hygiene practice of adult diabetic patients and their awareness about oral health problems related to diabetes. J Dent Oral Hyg. 2017;9(2):8–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Bangash RY, Khan AU, Manzoor MA. Diabetic Patients; Level Of Awareness About Oral Health Knowledge, Attitude And Practices. Pakistan Oral & Dent J. 2011;31(2):292–295.Google Scholar
  48. Ummadisetty T, Chava VK, Bhumanapalli VRR. Diabetes and periodontitis: how well are the patients aware about an established relation? J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(4):472–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Eldarrat AH. Diabetic patients: their knowledge and perception of oral health. Libyan J Med. 2011;6:1–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Karikoski A, Ilanne-Parikka P, Murtomaa H. Oral self care among adults with diabetes in Finland. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002;30:216–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. World Bank, World Development Indicators. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  52. Kanjirath PP, Kim SE, Inglehart MR. Diabetes and oral health: the importance of oral health–related behavior. J Dent Hyg. 2011;85(4):264–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Barbara C, White D, Lader D, Pitts N. Adult Dental Health Survey 2009. The Health and Social Care Information Centre 2011. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  54. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2016: with chartbook on long-term trends in health; 2017. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
  55. Chrisopoulos S, Harford JE, Ellershaw A. Oral health and dental care in Australia: key facts and figures 2015. In: Australian institute of health and welfare; 2016. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.Google Scholar
  56. Nakre PD, Harikiran AG. Effectiveness of oral health education programs: a systematic review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2013;3:103–15.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Colagiuri R, Girgis S, Eigenmann C, Gomez M, Griffiths R. National evidenced based guideline for patient education in type 2 diabetes. Canberra: Diabetes Australia and the NHMRC; 2009. Accessed 19 Sept 2017Google Scholar
  58. Petersen PE. The world oral health report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – the approach of the WHO global oral health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003;31:3–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanchez P, Everett B, Salamonson Y, Ajwani S, Bhole S, Bishop J, et al. Oral health and cardiovascular care: perceptions of people with cardiovascular disease. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181189.Google Scholar
  60. Kandelman D, Arpin S, Baez RJ, Baehni PC, Petersen PE. Oral health care systems in developing and developed countries. Periodontology. 2000, 60:98–109.Google Scholar
  61. Brennan DS, Luzzi L, Roberts-Thomson KF. Dental service patterns among private and public adult patients in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Moeller JF, Chen H, Manski RJ. Investing in preventive dental care for the Medicare population: a preliminary analysis. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2262–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Petersen PE. Priorities for research for oral health in the 21st century-the approach of the WHO global oral health Programme. Community Dent Health. 2005;22(2):71–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Johnson M, Ajwani S, Bhole S, Blinkhorn A, Dahlen HG, Ellis S, et al. Promoting oral health in pregnant women through midwifery practice: an innovative approach. HNE Handover. 2013;6(1):32.Google Scholar
  65. George A, Lang G, Johnson M, Ridge A, De Silva AM, Ajwani S, et al. The evaluation of an oral health education program for midwives in Australia. Women and Birth. 2016;29:208–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2018