From: Oral health knowledge, attitudes and care practices of people with diabetes: a systematic review
Author, Year, Country | Sample/ Questionnaire characteristics | Results | Quality Rating | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yuen et al. 2009, USA [18] | 253 (T1DM and T2DM); ≥18y/ 20-Q; V | K | ▪ OH~DM: 47% ▪ Adequate OH knowledge significantly associated with brushing (twice/day), flossing (once/day), and dental visit (twice/year) (P < 0.01) ▪ Receiving OH information significantly associated with adequate OH knowledge (P = 0.008) | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 61.2% â–ª Flossing: 34.9%; never: 35.3% â–ª Dental visit: 58.6% | |||
Tomar et al. 2000, USA [25] | N = 4570 (DM), 101,148 (NDM); ≥25 y/ 4-Q; V | A | ▪ Reasons behind not visiting dentists: perceived need to visit a dentist (37.2%), cost (28.6%), fear/anxiety (10.5%), and other reasons (23.7%) | a |
P | ▪ Dental visit: PWD 65.8% vs NDM 73.1% (P = 0.0000); result was consistent even after controlling confounders and other correlates: sex, age, race or ethnicity, educational attainment, income, and dental insurance coverage (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.93) | |||
Macek et al.,2008, USA [26] | N = 725 (DM), 7816 (NDM); ≥25 y | P | ▪ Dental visit: 56.8% PWD vs 64.7% NDM; result remain consistent even after adjusting periodontitis status, age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, poverty status and dental insurance status | a |
Moffet. 2010, USA [27] | N = 12,405 (DM) Q: V | P | ▪ Dental visit: 77% of patients (82% with dental insurance vs 61% without dental insurance (age sex adjusted OR 2.66, 95%CI 2.33–3.0). | a |
Oh et al. 2012, USA [28] | N = 1209 (DM) 9140 (NDM); ≥45 y | P | ▪ Dental visit: 72.7% PWD vs 83.5% NDM (95% CI: 82.6%–84.4%, p < .0001) ▪ Diabetes status adversely affected the rate of preventive dental care ▪ Adults from racial/ethnic minority background (OR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.79) or lower educational attainment (OR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.88) had lower odds of having received preventive dental care | a |
Orlando, et al., 2010, USA [29] | N = 89 (T1DM); 12–19 y/ 40-Q | K | ▪ Perio~DM; 44% ▪ Health care providers advised PWD for dental check up (77%) | b |
A | â–ª Care of their OH was as important as taking care of medical health: 49% â–ª Plaque or tartar build up was a problem: 33% | |||
P | â–ª Dental visit: 95.4%; majority (86.5%) paid through insurance | |||
Moore et al. 2000, USA [30] | N = 390 (T1DM), 203 age matched (NDM) | K | ▪ OH would be better if not have diabetes: 18.2% ▪ Health care providers advised for oral hygiene and dental visit: 27.1% | b |
A | â–ª PWD rated their overall oral health lower than control subjects â–ª The cost of dental care was main reason for avoiding routine visit | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 72.2% PWD vs 80.2% NDM â–ª Flossing: 33% vs 30% â–ª Dental visit: 68.9% vs 75.7% | |||
Alves et al., 2009, Brazil [31] | N = 55 (T1DM), 55 age matched (NDM) | K | ▪ None enrolled in an oral health educational program ▪ Informed to visit dentist by health professional: 65.5% | b |
A | â–ª Reasons for avoiding dental visit: difficulty in scheduling an appointment (36.1%) and high treatment costs (27.8%) | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 92.7% PWD vs 76.4% NDM â–ª Flossing: 30.9% vs 18.2% â–ª Dental visit: 63.8% vs. 48.7% | |||
Arunkumar et al. 2015. India [32] | N = 185 (T2DM) | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 33% ▪ Informed about OH from physicians; none | b |
Kejriwal et al.2014, India [33] | N = 300 (T2DM);18-65y/ 20-Q; V | K | ▪ Increased risk for oral diseases: 50% ▪ Informed about OH from physicians: 10% | b |
A | â–ª Preferred to see physicians for oral problem: 41% | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 65% â–ª Dental visit (in 6Â months): 27% | |||
Sandberg, et al.2001, Sweden [34] | N = 102 (T2DM), 102 age, gender matched (NDM); 34-77y | K | ▪ OH~DM: 27% |  |
A | â–ª Perceived satisfaction with teeth and mouth: satisfied (83.3%), dissatisfied (16.7%) â–ª Main reason for avoiding dental visits: belief that it was not necessary | b | ||
P | ▪ Brushing: ≥ 1times: 91.3% ▪ Dental visit: 85.1% PWD vs 95.1% NDM (P < 0.05) | |||
Lee et al. 2009, South Korea [35] | N = 75 (T2DM) | A | ▪ 62.7% perceived their OH status as poor with 37.3% perceived as good | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 90.6% â–ª Dental visit (within 6Â months): 45.3% | |||
Sahril et al. 2014, Malaysia [36] | N = 4017 (T2DM); ≥18 y | K | ▪ OH~DM: 35.5% | b |
A | â–ª Wanted dental referral: 59.9% â–ª Reasons not wanting a referral: perceived lack of necessity, absence of dental problems and perception that dental problems were not serious | |||
P | ▪ Dental visit: 16.7%; highest among: 18–19 y, lowest: ≥70 yrs | |||
Aggarwal et al. 2012, India [37] | N = 500 (T2DM); ≥35 y/ | K | ▪ OH~DM: 38.4% ▪ Never received a referral for dental care: 79.4% | b |
A | â–ª Avoiding dental visits due to unpleasant experience: 18.4% | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 33.4% â–ª Dental visit: 75.6%; visited for regular dental checkups: 10.8% | |||
Al Habashneh et al. 2010, Jordon [38] | N = 405 (DM); RR 81% 33-Q | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 47.7%; source of information: diabetes nurse (43%), physicians (38%), dentist (30%), | b |
A | â–ª Did not pay attention to bleeding gums: 13.7% â–ª Rated their overall oral health as poor: 60% | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 28.1% â–ª Dental visit (regular): 10% | |||
Allen et al., 2008, Ireland [39] | N = 101 (DM) 31-79y/ 20-Q; V | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 33%; source of information: dentist (51%), diabetes care providers (32%) | b |
A | â–ª Would choose to save a painful posterior tooth: 32% | |||
P | ▪ Dental visit: 42.5%; not attended for > 5 yrs.: 34% | |||
Badiah et al. 2012. Malaysia [40] | N = 102 (DM) RR 93%/ 10-Q; V | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 26.5% ▪ Needs to be extra careful on oral health practices: 19.6% ▪ Those who were aware of the risk and the need for extra oral health practice were more among those who brushed at least twice a day and regular attendees | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 80.4% â–ª Dental visit (1-2y): 33.3% | |||
Bahammam .2015, Saudi Arabia [41] | N = 454 (T1DM & T2DM); RR-87%. | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 46.7% ▪ Gum disease makes it harder to control diabetes: 21.8% ▪ Participants who had regular dental visits had significantly greater awareness of the Perio~DM link (P < 0.05) | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 26.8%, â–ª Flossing: occasional: 23.2%; never:73.6% â–ª Dental visit: 12.6% | |||
Bowyer et al. 2011, UK [42] | N = 229 (T1DM & T2DM); ≥ 25 y; RR 37.2% | K | ▪ Aware of mouth dryness: 43% ▪ Never received any OH advice: 69.1% | b |
A | â–ª Reasons for avoiding dental visit: cost (43.9%), lack of need (37.6%) and unpleasant visit (19.1%) | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 67.2% â–ª Flossing: 15.3% â–ª Dental visit: 85.2% | |||
Kamath,net al.2015, India [43] | N = 137 DM RR 90.6% | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 22.5% | c |
P | â–ª Brushing: 33.3% â–ª Dental visit: 27.5% | |||
Mirza et al. 2007, Pakistan [44] | N = 240 (T1DM & T2DM)/ Q;V | K | ▪ Aware about OH complications: 35.4% ▪ OH Knowledge was significantly related to brushing frequency (p = 0.005) as counselled patients brushed more frequently than uncounselled (53.4% vs 22.3%) | b |
A | â–ª Denied of DM~OH: 7.6% â–ª If advised about their predisposition to oral disease, willing to increase brushing frequency (45%) and consult a dentist (23%). Nevertheless, some (31.5%) were not reluctant to change | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 24% | |||
Sadeghi et al. 2014, Iran [45] | N = 200 (DM) Q; V | K | ▪ OH~DM: 36.5%; source of information: dentist (65%), physicians (35%) | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 7%; no brushing: 49.5% â–ª Dental visits: 83% | |||
Al Amassi et al.2017, Saudi Arabia [46] | N = 278 (DM); 18 -64y/ 20-Q | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 75.9%; source of information: media (31%), dentist (23%), physicians (21%) ▪ Controlling diabetes is important to minimize OH complications: 74.4% ▪ Patients with higher levels of education had greater awareness of the increased risk of OH problems and had better oral hygiene practices than those with lower levels of education (p < 0.05) | c |
P | â–ª Brushing: 19.1% â–ª Regular dental visit: 15.1% | |||
Bangash et al. 2011, Pakistan [47] | 300 (T1DM & T2DM)/ Q;V | K | â–ª DM~OH: 64%; source of information: physicians (35%) and dentists (65%) | b |
A | â–ª Denied existence of a link OH~DM: 23% â–ª Would increase brushing frequency if told of their predisposition to oral disease: 30% | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 86% | |||
Ummadisetty et al. 2016, India [48] | N = 60 (DM),143 (NDM); 40-55y/ Q;V | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 61.7%; source of information: physicians (36.6%) and dentist (30.69%) ▪ Physicians advised to visit a dentist: 46% |  |
Eldarrat. 2011, UAE [49] | N = 100 (DM) RR 50% | K | ▪ Perio~DM: 60% | b |
A | â–ª Main reason of dental visit: due to pain/discomfort | |||
P | â–ª Brushing: 31%; did not brush daily: 19% â–ª Flossing: once a day: 11%; never: 66% â–ª Dental visit: 40% | |||
Karikosk et al. 2002, Finland [50] | N = 336 (T2DM); 1 ≥ 18 y/ 29-Q | A | ▪ Main reason for not seeing a dentist: not having any problems (95%) ▪ Important for the diabetes nurse to also offer advice about dental care: 92% | b |
P | â–ª Brushing: 38% â–ª Dental visit: 63% | |||
Kanjirath,P.P, 2011, USA [52] | N = 77 (DM) and 366 (NDM) | P | ▪ Brushing: 31.5% PWD vs 49% NDM ▪ Flossing: 19.4% vs 26.7.% ▪ Dental visit: 86.7% vs 82.2% | b |