Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection and associated risk factors among village health volunteers in rural communities of southern Thailand

  • 1, 2Email author,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 3
BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:564

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4486-2

  • Received: 14 January 2017
  • Accepted: 1 June 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Intestinal parasitic infections remain prevalent and constitute a public health problem in certain rural areas of Thailand. Village health volunteers (VHVs), who are members of a Thai healthcare alliance, function as key providers of health prevention measures, disease control, and health education and share national health promotion campaigns with community members. This study is aimed at evaluating the prevalence, intensity, and risk factors for intestinal parasitic infection in VHVs in order to design community awareness and health education campaigns for the target population.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted between January to April 2016 among village health volunteers (VHVs) from four sub-districts of Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. Subjects for the study were selected using a simple random sampling method. Socio-demographic variables and risk factors were collected by a structured questionnaire. Stool specimens were collected and processed using direct wet mount and formol-ether concentration techniques to determine the presence of parasites and modified Kato-Katz thick smear to determine the intensity of infection.

Results

A total of 324 VHVs were enrolled. The overall prevalence of intestinal helminths was 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.3–13.0). The prevalence of hookworm, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Trichuris trichiura were 8.0% (95% CI: 5.3–11.5), 0.9% (95% CI: 0.2–2.7), and 0.3% (95% CI: 0–1.7), respectively. Mean intensity of hookworm infection was 1732 eggs per gram of stool. The prevalence was lower for protozoan infection than for helminth infection. Blastocystis hominis accounted for the highest percentage of intestinal protozoan infections 4.0% (95% CI: 2.2–6.8), followed by Giardia intestinalis 0.6% (95% CI: 0–2.2). No statistically significant difference was observed in the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among sub-districts (p > 0.05). Having dogs at home was associated with soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection in study participants (Crude prevalence ratio [CPR]: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0–5.2).

Conclusions

This study is the first to describe the prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection VHVs from southern Thailand. Hookworm infection is more prevalent than other types of STH infection. The development of community awareness campaigns and appropriate control measures should be considered to reduce the prevalence of hookworm infection, especially among VHVs who are the key persons providing health education to the community.

Keywords

  • Intestinal parasitic infection
  • Village health volunteers
  • Risk factors
  • Nakhon Si Thammarat Province
  • Thailand

Background

The World Health Organization estimates that approximately 1.5 billion people are infected with soil-transmitted helminths worldwide [1]. In Thailand, helminth infection remains a significant health problem in rural communities of some regions. A national survey in 2009 found the prevalence of helminthiasis in the Thai population was 18.1%, with persistent high prevalence of opisthorchiasis and hookworm infection in the northeastern and southern regions of Thailand, respectively [2]. The high prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection is closely associated with poverty, climatic conditions, poor personal hygiene, poor sanitation, and unsafe drinking water [25].

Previous studies conducted in areas of southern Thailand have given due attention to distributions of intestinal parasites in adults and school-age children [2, 6, 7], but patterns of intestinal parasitism have not been reported in village health volunteers (VHVs) who act as community health workers in rural communities of Thailand. VHVs are members of a Thai healthcare alliance established to promote healthcare service communication and collaboration at the primary healthcare level. In general, VHVs are local folks who willingly volunteer themselves to work for their community in terms of public health. Apart from their occupations, they generally act as a mediator between local healthcare providers and local folks. All VHVs receive health information from public health personnel and function as key providers of information about health promotion and education, disease control, and available basic health services to villagers [8]. To understand STH burden in VHVs would be helpful not only in determining the burden of the infection in the community as they are local folks themselves, but also in providing awareness of STH and the importance of personal hygiene as they are groups of people who aid the local healthcare personnel providing health education to the community.

Baseline data on intestinal parasitic infection is necessary to plan appropriate control programs and strategies for VHVs. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the prevalence and associated risk factors of intestinal parasitic infection in VHVs living in Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. The findings of this study help strengthen the information currently available about parasitic infections and can be used to encourage policy makers and public health officials to develop training programs for parasitic control and health promotion for community health workers.

Methods

Study design and setting

This cross-sectional study was carried out from January to April 2016 in Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. Nopphitam District is located at the geographical coordinates of 8°43′10″N latitude and 99°45′6″E longitude, which is about 780 km south of the Thai capital of Bangkok (Fig. 1). Average temperature is 27.1 °C, with a minimum 25.8 °C in January and maximum 29.3 °C in May. Annual rainfall is 1454.3 mm (Climatological Center, Thai Meteorological Department, Annual Report 2015). This district is divided into four sub-districts (tambon), namely Na Reng, Karo, Nopphitam, and Krungching, which are further subdivided into 38 villages (muban). Nopphitam District is considered remote and rural and there is only one community hospital. These four sub-districts share the same geographic landscape. The main access road is non-asphalt while the remaining roads are asphalt. The majority of land is used for farmland and rubber plantations. According to the Department of Provincial Administration, the estimated total population of these sub-districts in 2015 was 33,183. Agriculture is the main economic activity of people in this area.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map of Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. (Map from Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Atlas_of_Thailand#)

Study population, sample size and sampling technique

The study was conducted among village health volunteers residing in four sub-districts of Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province. The sample size was determined using the single population proportion formula. It was calculated from the prevalence rate (p) of 19.8% from a previous study [2], with a 95% confidence interval (z = 1.96), 5% margin of error (d = 0.05). The calculated sample size was 244. We assumed that the final sample size would be reduced by around 30% due to unable to pass stool on the study date and thus aimed for a sample size of 330. Simple random sampling method was used to selected village health volunteers from each sub-districts. We randomly selected 330 VHVs, then gave instructions and distributed plastic containers for stool collection. Finally, a total of 324 village health volunteers returned stool specimens, which consisted of 22.22% (72) from Na Reng, 24.38% (79) from Karo, 16.98% (55) from Nopphitam, and 36.42% (118) from Krungching. We decided to keep all the samples in the study for the sake of health surveillance regardless of the calculated sample size, hence, the final sample size was 324.

Data collection and laboratory processing

A structured questionnaire was developed and used to collect demographic and socioeconomic data (i.e. age, education level and income). Information on possible risk factors (i.e. personal hygiene behaviors such as hand washing and shoe wearing) was also collected via the questionnaire (Additional file 1). All completed questionnaires were checked for accuracy and completeness. After proper instruction, a clean plastic container labeled with the subject’s name and identification number was distributed to each participant and one day later they returned containers back with at least 10 g of stool. Each specimen was checked for correct labeling, quantity of sample, and procedure of collection and transported immediately to the parasitology laboratory of the School of Medicine, Walailak University.

A portion of each specimen was processed immediately using a direct microscopic technique with a saline and iodine solution to detect cysts, trophozoites, eggs, and larvae of intestinal parasites. The remainder of each specimen was analyzed using the formol-ether concentration technique. Briefly, 1 g of stool sample was suspended in 3 ml of 10% formalin, sieved with cotton gauze, and transferred to a 15-ml conical centrifuge tube. Then, 8 ml of 10% formalin and 3 ml of diethyl ether were added and the resulting solution was centrifuged for 5 min at 2000 rpm. Subsequently, the supernatant was discarded, and the remaining sediment was observed under light microscope at 10× and 40× objectives to detect eggs and larvae of helminths, cysts, and trophozoites of protozoan parasites. Iodine solution was used to detect and identify cysts of protozoan parasites. In addition, each stool sample was analyzed by the modified Kato-Katz technique [9] (kits were purchased from Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University). The intensity of soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection was estimated indirectly by counting the number of eggs per gram (EPG) of stool and calculated by multiplying each slide count by 40. The results of intensity for STH were classified into low, moderate, and high according WHO recommendation; for Ascaris lumbricoides: low 1–4999 EPG, moderate 5000–49,999 EPG, and high 49,999 EPG; for Trichuris trichiura: low 1–999 EPG, moderate 1000–9999 EPG, and high 9999 EPG; and for hookworm; low 1–1999 EPG, moderate 2000–3999 EPG, and high 3999 EPG, respectively [10]. To eliminate observer bias, each stool sample was examined by two trained senior medical laboratory technologists who were not informed about the health status and other details of the study participants.

Data analysis

We used proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to describe the prevalence of intestinal parasites. Quantitative variables were described by mean and standard deviations (SD) and qualitative variables were described by frequency (percentage). Initially, the differences of the presence of intestinal parasites among sub-districts and were assessed by chi-square test. The prevalence ratios were computed by Poisson regression with robust estimation to measure the strength of the association between each independent variable and STH infection. To adjust for possible confounders, all variables with P-value less than 0.1 in the univariate analysis were analyzed using multivariate Poisson regression analysis. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were entered, cleaned, and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics

A total of 324 study participants, comprising 38 males and 286 females, were enrolled in the study. The mean age of participants was 45 years (standard deviation 9.0), with a range of 23 to 71 years. The age-group distribution showed that a majority (39.5%) were in the 41–50-years age group. All participants were Buddhist. Most participants were married (89.5%), and a majority was farmers (80.2%). About half (53.1%) of participants indicated secondary education was the highest level received, and around one-third (32.4%) indicated primary education was the highest level (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of study participants in Nopphitam District of Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand

Characteristics

Number

Percentage

Sex

 Male

38

11.7

 Female

286

88.3

Age group

 21–30

19

5.9

 31–40

85

26.2

 41–50

128

39.5

  ≥ 51

92

28.4

Marital status

 Single

8

2.5

 Married

290

89.5

 Divorced

21

6.5

 Widowed

5

1.5

Education

 Primary school

105

32.4

 Secondary school

172

53.1

 High vocational/college certificate

26

8.0

 Bachelor’s degree or over

21

6.5

Occupation

 Farmer

260

80.2

 Employee

21

6.5

 Merchant

14

4.3

 Housewife

20

6.2

 Other

9

2.8

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in village health volunteers

The overall prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection among participants was 45/324 (13.9%, 95% CI: 10.3–18.1). A majority of the infected participants 97.8% (44/45) had a single infection while one participant 2.2% (1/45) was found to have a double infection (hookworm and Trichuris trichiura). Among helminth infections, hookworms 27/324 (8.3%, 95% CI: 5.6–11.9) was the predominate parasite, followed by Strongyloides stercoralis 3/324 (0.9%, 95% CI: 0.2–2.7) and T. trichiura 1/324 (0.3%, 95% CI: 0–1.7). No cestodes or trematodes were detected in this study. Of 27 participants who were positive for hookworm infection, 85.2% (23/27), 11.5% (3/27), and 3.7% (1/27) had low (1–1999 EPG), moderate (2000–3999 EPG), and high (≥4000 EPG) intensity of infection, respectively. All participants infected with T. trichiura had low (1–999 EPG) intensity.

The prevalence of helminth infection ranged from 7.6% to 11.4% at the study sites. The highest prevalence of the helminth infection was observed in Karo sub-district, and protozoan infection was found frequently in Krungching sub-district. The overall difference in parasite prevalence among the study sites was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Table 2). The prevalence of helminth infection was twice the prevalence of protozoan infection. With regard to protozoa infection, the prevalence of protozoan infection ranged from 1.8% to 5.9%. The highest prevalence was due to Blastocystis hominis 13/324 (4.0%, 95% CI: 2.2–6.8) and followed by Giardia intestinalis 2/324 (0.6%, 95% CI: 0–2.2) (Table 2).
Table 2

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection in Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand

Parasite

Study site

Overall (n = 324)

X 2

P-value

Na Reng

Karo

Nopphitam

Krungching

(n = 72)

(n = 79)

(n = 55)

(n = 118)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

No. (%)

 

Helminths

 Hookworms

7 (9.7)

7 (8.8)

3 (5.4)

9 (7.6)

26 (8.0)

0.798

0.850

Strongyloides stercoralis

0 (0.0)

1 (1.3)

2 (3.6)

0 (0.0)

3 (0.9)

5.472

0.140

Trichuris trichiura

0 (0.0)

1 (1.3)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.6)

2.418

0.491

 Total

7 (9.7)

9 (11.4)

5 (9.0)

9 (7.6)

30 (9.6)

0.048

0.997

Protozoans

Blastocystis hominis

2 (2.8)

4 (5.1)

1 (1.8)

6 (5.1)

13 (4.0)

2.283

0.516

Giardia intestinalis

1 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

1 (0.8)

2 (0.6)

2.349

0.503

 Total

3 (4.2)

4 (5.1)

1 (1.8)

7 (5.9)

15 (4.6)

1.648

0.648

Overall

11 (15.3)

13 (16.4)

6 (10.9)

16 (13.5)

45 (13.8)

0.698

0.874

The distribution of infection among female and male participants is shown in Fig. 2. Male participants had the overall prevalence at 18.4% (7/38) whereas the infection rate in female participants was slightly lower at 13.3% (38/286). The difference in prevalence of intestinal parasites between female and male participants was not statistically significant.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Sex-related prevalence of intestinal parasites among study subjects in Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand

Risk factors associated with soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infection

Univariate analysis of factors potentially associated with STH, as shown in Table 3, revealed significant associations between STH infections with having dogs at home. VHVs who had dogs at home were two times more likely to be infected than those who did not (Crude prevalence ratio 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0–5.2, p = 0.047). STH infection was not significantly associated with gender, age group, or monthly family income (p > 0.05). All the participants with STH infection graduated the highest level of education at primary/secondary school. The prevalence ratio regarding level of education could not be calculated due to none of participants with bachelor’s degree or higher had STH infection. After adjusting for possible confounders by multivariate analysis, none of the risk factors were associated with STH infection (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis of soil-transmitted helminth infection and potential risk factors among study participants

Variables

Positive No. (%)

Negative No. (%)

Total n = 324

Crude PR (95% CI)

P-value

Adjusted PR (95% CI)

P-value

Gender

 Male

6 (15.8)

32 (84.2)

38

1.9 (0.8–4.3)

0.135

  

 Female

24 (8.4)

262 (91.6)

286

    

Age in years

  < 40

6 (6.6)

85 (93.4)

91

0.6 (0.3–1.5)

0.310

  

  ≥ 40

24 (10.3)

209 (89.7)

233

    

Monthly family income (Thai Baht)

  < 10,000

14 (11.0)

113 (89.0)

127

1.4 (0.7–2.7)

0.380

  

  ≥ 10,001

16 (8.1)

181 (91.9)

197

    

Education

 Primary/secondary school

30 (9.9)

273 (90.1)

303

    

 Bachelor’s degree or higher

0 (0)

21 (100)

21

    

Wears shoes when outside

 No

1 (20.0)

4 (80)

5

2.2 (0.4–13.1)

0.387

  

 Yes

29 (9.1)

290 (90.9)

319

    

Wear boots when on farm

 No

1 (14.3)

6 (85.7)

7

1.6 (0.3–9.9)

0.636

  

 Yes

29 (9.1)

288 (90.9)

317

    

Open-field defecation

 Yes

29 (11.0)

235 (89.0)

264

6.6 (0.9–47.4)

0.061

5.5 (0.7–41.2)

0.099

 No

1 (1.7)

59 (98.3)

60

    

Have dogs at home

 Yes

23 (12.0)

168 (88.0)

191

2.3 (1.0–5.2)

0.047

1.6 (0.7–3.7)

0.276

 No

7 (5.3)

126 (94.7)

133

    

Have cats at home

 Yes

12 (8.7)

126 (91.3)

138

0.9 (0.5–1.8)

0.763

  

 No

18 (9.7)

168 (90.3)

186

    

Contact with domestic animals

 Yes

27 (11.2)

215 (88.8)

242

3.1 (1.0–9.8)

0.061

2.5 (0.8–7.8)

0.131

 No

3 (3.7)

79 (96.3)

82

    

Wash hands after touching animals

 No

1 (10.0)

9 (90.0)

10

1.1 (0.2–7.2)

0.934

  

 Yes

29 (9.2)

285 (90.8)

314

    

Drinks purified water

 Not boiled or filtered

10 (14.3)

60 (85.7)

70

1.8 (0.9–3.7)

0.101

  

 Boiled or filtered

20 (7.9)

234 (92.1)

254

    

Discussion

This study demonstrates the prevalence of intestinal parasite infection among VHVs living in Nopphitam District of Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, southern Thailand. The overall prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection 45/324 (13.9% 95% CI: 10.3–18.1) was lower than the prevalence found in other similar studies. For example, a survey of residents of southern Thailand found prevalence of 19.8% [2], and a survey conducted in rural communities in northeast Thailand found 37% of people had an intestinal parasitic infection [3]. These variations in prevalence may be due to differences in climatic conditions, environmental sanitation, economic and educational status of study subjects, and previous control efforts. In the present study, multiple infections were found in only one subject (2.2% of the sample), which is much lower than the prevalence determined in previous studies in rural Thai communities [3, 5]. Differences in the study population, sample size, and methods of analysis could contribute to differences in the detection of various parasites. The present study was conducted among VHVs, which may have resulted in participants with better knowledge of personal health and hygiene than other study populations, thus contributing to lower prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection. As we enrolled 324 VHVs which exceeded the calculated sample size, our findings were considered to represent the population in this area in terms of the generalizability.

For protozoan infection, the prevalence of Blastocystis hominis and Giardia intestinalis infection in this study was 4.0% and 0.6%, respectively. Infection with Blastocystis hominis was more prevalent among female participants. Among sub-districts, Krungching sub-district had slightly higher prevalence of protozoa infection when compared with others. In general, all sub-districts are considered homogeneous in terms of geography and general living conditions. Although the highest prevalence of protozoa was observed at Krungching sub-district, there was no statistical difference. These pathogenic protozoa are transmitted by the fecal-oral route. Blastocystis hominis can cause diarrhea if the burden of infection is high. The presence of five or more B. hominis cells per 40× magnification field during direct microscopic examination of a wet-mounted stool smear is considered a sufficient amount of this pathogen to cause clinical illness [11]. Blastocystis sp. is transmitted through consumption of untreated or minimally treated water and uncooked or undercooked food [12]. Therefore, the burden of pathogenic intestinal protozoa causing diarrhea in the communities comprising the study area should be further studied, and water sources and supplies in the community should be further examined for pathogenic intestinal protozoa. Molecular techniques such as polymerase chain reaction are needed to confirm prevalence and identify subtypes of Blastocystis sp.

STHs are a group of parasitic nematode worms causing human infection through contact with eggs or larvae that thrive in the warm and moist soil of tropical and subtropical areas [13]. Globally, an estimated 438.9 million people were infected with hookworm, 819.0 million with Ascaris lumbricoides, and 464.6 million with T. trichiura in 2010 [14]. STHs, including hookworms, S. stercoralis, and T. trichiura, were detected in study participants whereas A. lumbricoides was not. This finding is consistent with a previous study among highland and lowland dwellers in the Gamo area of southern Ethiopia [15]. On the contrary, other studies conducted in peninsular Malaysia reported T. trichiura as the predominant STH in children [16, 17]. High prevalence of S. stercoralis was found in suburban areas of Nakhon Ratchaima Province in northeastern Thailand [5] and in rural areas of Cambodia [18, 19]. However, previous studies found A. lumbricoides was the most prevalent STH in school children in Ethiopia [20, 21], suggesting that young age might be associated with a higher risk of ascariasis. In addition, this study revealed that contact with domestic animals increased the risk of STH infection. However, data analysis revealed that the incidence of the STH infection was not significantly different among occupations. The differences in prevalence and distribution of STH among the various communities may be due to variations in host, age, genetics, time of study, parasitological technique used, personal hygiene practices, and environmental factors such as climate, topography, surface temperature, altitude, soil type, and rainfall, all of which significantly influence the distribution of STH [13, 22, 23].

STH is known to be endemic in southern Thailand. The present study showed that hookworm infection (8.3%) was more prevalent than other types of STH infection. However, the prevalence of hookworm infection was lower than in previous studies conducted in southern Thailand [2, 7, 24]. A recent national survey found the prevalence of hookworm infection was 15.8% in southern Thailand compared to 4.7%, 3.8%, and 3.2% in northeastern, north, and central Thailand, respectively [2]. The lower prevalence of hookworm infection in the present study may be due to differences in study population, urbanization, climate, general living conditions, and the accessibility of health services. In general, the majority of people infected with hookworms, Strongyloides stercoralis, and Trichuris trichiura are without symptoms. The participants who found to be infected with these parasites were informed and treated following CDC recommendations regarding the types of parasites. In Thailand, the costs of the anti-parasitic drugs are generally inexpensive.

This study demonstrated significant associations between STH infection and having dogs at home. Humans acquire hookworms when the infective larval stage (known as third-stage larvae or L3) living in soil either penetrates the skin or is ingested [25, 26]. In general, contact with dogs is not considered a risk factor for STH infection as they are not in the life cycle of the parasites. Interestingly, the association we found could result from soil contamination from dogs to humans. Furthermore, all participants with STH infection had the highest level of education of primary/secondary school whereas none of those graduated Bachelor’s degree or higher had STH infection. This implied that health education was needed to be emphasized among VHVs with lower degree of education. In Thailand, Necator americanus is the most common type of hookworm in the central [4], northeastern, and southern regions [7, 27]. In addition, Ancylostoma ceylanicum and Ancylostoma caninum, which are types of hookworm found in dogs and cats, have been detected in rural communities in Thailand [4, 27]. Therefore, the high percentage of study participants who indicated they keep pets at home and have contact with domestic animals indicates they may be at risk for acquiring animal hookworms. However, further work is needed to identify hookworms in the feces of domestic animals and in soil samples in communities in the studied area. These results may be helpful for understanding the mode of hookworm transmission and developing appropriate measures for controlling human and animal hookworm infection.

The present study was subjected to the following limitations. Fecal examination to detect the presence of helminths was carried out on only a single day, which could result in random error from one-time measurement and could affect diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of any parasites. Methods such as Harada Moori’s filter paper for S. stercoralis and hookworm infection were not performed. The risk factor analysis was restricted to questionnaire data and may not represent overall risk patterns. Unmeasured confounding in this study was presumably resulted from a selection bias. As the study was conducted among VHVs, it might probably select the participants with better knowledge of personal health and hygiene than other villagers. Finally, there were some limitations in the generalizability of our findings: due to the majority of VHVs’ gender, the gender of the participants was mainly female. Although gender was not statistically associated with STH infection, but the result of this study might not exactly represent the general population. Furthermore, the results of this study were applied to Nopphitam District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand, so there might be different results in other geographical settings, especially those outside southern Thailand.

Conclusions

This is the first report to describe the prevalence of parasitic infections in village health volunteers from southern Thailand. Hookworm infection was prevalent in the studied communities. Having dogs at home was found to be significantly associated with STH infection. Appropriate measures such as education on personal hygiene and environmental sanitation and the development of awareness strategies should be implemented to control parasitic infection in VHVs.

Abbreviations

APR: 

Adjusted prevalence ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

CPR: 

Crude prevalence ratio

EPG: 

Eggs per gram

STH: 

Soil-transmitted helminth

VHV: 

Village health volunteer

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the director of Nopphitam District Public Health Office and the directors of each sub-district health promoting hospital for their support throughout the course of this study. Special thanks are also given to Miss Potiga Chotipong for her assistance in preparing reagent and laboratory instruments.

Funding

This study was funded by Institute of Research and Development, Walailak University for financial support for this research (Grant No. WU59203). The funder had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis, writing or interpretation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets assembled and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Authors’ contributions

CP, NP, SB, KT, NS and SN conceived the idea for this study, developed the methodology and designed the study. CP, SB, KT, NS and SN conduct of the study and performed the experiments. CP, NP, SB, and KT analyzed the data and guarantee the statistical analysis. CP, NP, SB, KT, NS and SN wrote the manuscript. CP and NP revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee on Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human Subjects, Walailak University prior to the recruitment of any participants (15/080). All research was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The aim of the study was fully explained to VHVs, and participation was voluntary. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before data and sample collection. The purpose and significance of the study were explained to and permission was obtained from the director of Nopphitam District Public Health Office and the director of each sub-district health promoting hospital.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Medicine, Walailak University, 222 Thasala District, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
(2)
Tropical Diseases and Parasitic Infectious Diseases Research Group, Walailak University, 222 Thasala District, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand
(3)
Noppitum Hospital, Noppitum District, Nakhon Si Thammarat, 80161, Thailand

References

  1. WHO. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. Fact sheet no.366. 2017. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs366/en/. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  2. Wongsaroj T, Nithikathkul C, Rojkitikul W, Nakaia W, Royal L, Rammasut P. National survey of helminthiasis in Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2014;8:779–83.Google Scholar
  3. Boonjaraspinyo S, Boonmars T, Kaewsamut B, Ekobol N, Laummaunwai P, Aukkanimart R, et al. A cross-sectional study on intestinal parasitic infections in rural communities, northeast Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:727–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiraanankul V, Aphijirawat W, Mungthin M, Khositnithikul R, Rangsin R, Traub RJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors of hookworm infection in a rural community of central Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84:594–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Kitvatanachai S, Boonslip S, Watanasatitarpa S. Intestinal parasitic infections in Srimum suburban area of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. Trop Biomed. 2008;25:237–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Anantaphruti MT, Jongsuksuntigul P, Imsomboon T, Nagai N, Muennoo C, Saguankiat S, Pubampen S, Kojima S: School-based helminthiases control: I. A baseline study of soil-transmitted helminthiases in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2002; 33 Suppl 3:113–119.Google Scholar
  7. Anantaphruti MT, Maipanich W, Muennoo C, Pubampen S, Sanguankiat S. Hookworm infections of schoolchildren in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2002;33:468–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kowitt SD, Emmerling D, Fisher EB, Tanasugarn C. Community health workers as agents of health promotion: analyzing Thailand's village health volunteer program. J Community Health. 2015;40:780–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Katz N, Chaves A, Pellegrino J. A simple device for quantitative stool thick-smear technique in Schistosomiasis mansoni. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1972;14:397–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. WHO. Helminth control in school-age children. A guide for managers of control programmes. 2nd ed. 2011. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44671/1/9789241548267_eng.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  11. Sheehan DJ, Raucher BG, McKitrick JC. Association of Blastocystis hominis with signs and symptoms of human disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1986;24:548–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Slifko TR, Smith HV, Rose JB. Emerging parasite zoonoses associated with water and food. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:1379–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367:1521–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pullan RL, Smith JL, Jasrasaria R, Brooker SJ. Global numbers of infection and disease burden of soil transmitted helminth infections in 2010. Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Wegayehu T, Tsalla T, Seifu B, Teklu T. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among highland and lowland dwellers in Gamo area. South Ethiopia BMC Public Health. 2013;13:151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Anuar TS, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors in three orang Asli tribes in peninsular Malaysia. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4101.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ngui R, Aziz S, Chua KH, Aidil RM, Lee SC, Tan TK, et al. Patterns and risk factors of soil-transmitted helminthiasis among orang Asli subgroups in peninsular Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93:361–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Khieu V, Schar F, Forrer A, Hattendorf J, Marti H, Duong S, et al. High prevalence and spatial distribution of Strongyloides stercoralis in rural Cambodia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2854.Google Scholar
  19. Khieu V, Schar F, Marti H, Bless PJ, Char MC, Muth S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Strongyloides stercoralis in Takeo Province. Cambodia Parasit Vectors. 2014;7:221.Google Scholar
  20. Shumbej T, Belay T, Mekonnen Z, Tefera T, Zemene E. Soil-transmitted helminths and associated factors among pre-school children in Butajira town. South-Central Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abossie A, Seid M. Assessment of the prevalence of intestinal parasitosis and associated risk factors among primary school children in Chencha town. Southern Ethiopia BMC Public Health. 2014;14:166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hotez PJ, Brindley PJ, Bethony JM, King CH, Pearce EJ, Jacobson J. Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:1311–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hotez PJ, Bundy DAP, Beegle K, Brooker S, Drake L, de Silva N, et al. Helminth infections: soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis. In: Jamison DT BJ, Measham AR, et al, editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2006.Google Scholar
  24. Chongsuvivatwong V, Pas-Ong S, Ngoathammatasna W, McNeil D, Vithsupakorn K, Bridhikitti V, et al. Evaluation of hookworm control program in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1994;25:745–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brooker S, Bethony J, Hotez PJ. Human hookworm infection in the 21st century. Adv Parasitol. 2004;58:197–288.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hotez PJ, Brooker S, Bethony JM, Bottazzi ME, Loukas A, Xiao S. Hookworm infection. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:799–807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Phosuk I, Intapan PM, Thanchomnang T, Sanpool O, Janwan P, Laummaunwai P, et al. Molecular detection of Ancylostoma duodenale, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, and Necator americanus in humans in northeastern and southern Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:747–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement