Skip to main content

The ticking time bomb in lifestyle-related diseases among women in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries; review of systematic reviews

Abstract

Background

This study aims to review all published systematic reviews on the prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors among women from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC). This is the first review of other systematic reviews that concentrates on lifestyle related diseases among women in GCC countries only.

Method

Literature searches were carried out in three electronic databases for all published systematic reviews on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the GCC countries between January 2000 and February 2016.

Results

Eleven systematic reviews were identified and selected for our review. Common reported risk factors for cardiovascular disease were obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and hypertension. In GCC countries, obesity among the female population ranges from 29 to 45.7%, which is one of the highest rates globally, and it is linked with physical inactivity, ranging from 45 to 98.7%. The prevalence of diabetes is listed as one of the top ten factors globally, and was reported with an average of 21%. Hypertension ranged from 20.9 to 53%.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases among women population in GCC is a ticking time bomb and is reaching alarming levels, and require a fundamental social and political changes. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive work among the GCC to strengthen the regulatory framework to decrease and control the prevalence of these factors.

Peer Review reports

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD’s) remain the leading cause of death worldwide [1], resulting in more than 17.9 million mortalities in 2015. More than 3 million of such deaths occurred in people under the age of 60, which could have been largely prevented [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other organizations such as the American Heart Association (AHA) have recognized many risk factors, some of which are modifiable. These include hypertension (HTN), diabetes, obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) [3, 4]. In addition, many unhealthy lifestyles like smoking, physical inactivity, high consumption of carbohydrates and fatty foods have been identified as factors that increase the risk of CVD [5]. Rapid economic growth as well as urbanization have been also associated with higher consumption of unhealthy foods and lower physical activity, which may increase the risk of CVD [6].

The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is a political and economic alliance of six Middle Eastern countries that includes the Kingdom Saudi Arabia (KSA), Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, (UAE) and Kuwait. The GCC was established in 1981 to ensure mutual investment and free trade between its member countries. This agreement also contributed to improvements in several fields including: education, culture, tourism, social opportunities, and health among member states [7]. Life in the GCC has changed dramatically after the discovery of oil, which became the main revenue for financing healthcare services. However, the recent fluctuation in the price of oil has affected the healthcare budget. Although GCC countries are examining different options to finance the healthcare service, up to this point, there is no clear alternative or implemented approach to achieve this goal [8, 9]. In 2013, Chahine et al., calculated the direct and indirect costs of five selected non-communicable diseases (NCD) in the GCC was $36.2 billion, where specifically, the cost of CVD and diabetes reached over $11 billion. This cost is estimated to increase to $67.9 billion by 2022, which is equivalent to one and a half times the healthcare budget of the six governments (see Table 1: The direct and indirect factors of the five selected NCDs in the GCC) [10]. However, with these healthcare expenses, the current healthcare systems adopted by some of the GCC countries is below what is available in middle-income countries [9].

Table 1 The direct and indirect of the five selected NCD in the GCC in 2013 [10]

The prevalence of CVD risk factors, especially physical inactivity and obesity, is particularly high among women in the region [11]. This is highlighted by a report published by the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events, which found that among 7900 patients with acute coronary syndrome, women had significantly higher prevalence of HTN, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia compared to men. Women were also diagnosed with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction more frequently than men [12, 13]. Beside, women at higher risk especially in third world countries due to less access to health service, and use of medications [14]. In addition, growing evidence shows that gender inequality in income, education, health care, nutrition and political voice are strongly associated with poor health and well-being [15], making these issues extremely relevant to Arab countries in general and GCC in particular, where gender inequality is substantial [11, 16]. Such inequalities are reflected in the literature; studies focusing on women in GCC countries are limited, despite the magnitude of the problem. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the modifiable CVD risk factors among women in GCC in order to inform clinicians and decision-makers in the region.

Methods

Electronic literature searches for all systematic reviews published from January 2000 to February 2016 were conducted to identify all systematic reviews of CVD risk among women in the GCC region. The search was carried out in the following electronic databases: Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database (see Table 2 for search terms). No language restrictions were applied. Throughout this review, special attention was given to the modifiable risks such as HTN, diabetes, obesity, MetS, physical inactivity and smoking. Unhealthy diet, although a known CVD risk factor, was not explored in this study. The effect of diet on health is complex and different studies have focused on either overall diet patterns or individual components that include salt, sugar, fat content, fruit and vegetables, also, Also the problem with an acceptable definition of healthy diet. Hence, a comprehensive assessment of unhealthy diet would warrant a separate review. We included all systematic reviews that reported the prevalence of CVD risk factors among women in the GCC region countries. We excluded studies that reported combined data for both genders without separate prevalence for women. However, all included studies that reported the differences between genders were documented to compare gender differences in the prevalence of CVD risk factors. Any other systematic reviews from the Middle East and North Africa that included any individual GCC countries were also included. Abstracts of reviews were inspected by two authors (MA, HA) and those appearing to meet the inclusion criteria were retrieved and read in full by both authors (see Fig. 1). The quality of those studies was assessed by two authors using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review Tool (AMSTAR), a tool which has been validated as a means to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews [17]. It uses an 11 point scale, where the maximum score is 11. Scores 0–4 indicate low quality, 5–8 moderate quality, and 9–11 high quality [18]. The data has been extracted independently by two researchers (MA, HA). Any disagreements were resolved by discussion between them (See Table 3: Quality assessment for reviewing the systematic reviews (AMSTAR®).

Table 2 selected search terms
Fig. 1
figure1

Flow Chart of the Selected Studies

Table 3 Quality assessment for reviewing the systematic reviews (AMSTAR®)

Results

Thirteen out of 88 systematic reviews were deemed to meet inclusion criteria; however, two of them were excluded as they report results for both genders combined [19, 20]. As a result, only 11 of them were considered in this paper (See Figure 1). The majority of these studies are conducted in Saudi Arabia (Table 4). The quality of most of them was moderate according to the AMSTAR criteria [18]. Three studies were identified as low quality [2123] and one as high [24]. (See Table 3 for more information).

Table 4 Data Extraction

Obesity

Six systematic reviews reported the prevalence of obesity among women in the GCC region. Most of them adopt the WHO definition for BMI, identified as an indicator for obesity (obese: BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). The prevalence of obesity among women in the GCC is high and ranges from 29.2% up to 45.3%. The highest prevalence was among Qatari women (45.3%); the prevalence was 38.4% in KSA and 35.2% in Kuwait. The lower prevalence levels are reported in UAE (31.3%) and Oman (29.2%) [21, 22, 2528]. While obesity has greater prevalence in women than men, being overweight is more prevalent among men within the GCC (See Table 4).

Physical inactivity

The prevalence of physical inactivity among the female population in the GCC region is reaching an alarming level, ranging from 50.7 to 98.7%. In 2007 Al-Nozha et al., reported the rate of physical inactivity from a large national health survey in Saudi Arabia, the result was shocking, 96% in both sex, and more was among women 98.1% [29]. Bahraini women share the same high level of physical inactivity with a prevalence of up to 98.7%, including a study showing that 93% of Bahraini women walk less than 1 km daily. Furthermore, the prevalence of physical inactivity among Kuwaiti women stands between 71.6 and 80.8%. The reviews in Qatar and Oman report a prevalence from 60.5 to 69.3% respectively. UAE stands at 50.7%, however, 56.7% of the women were inactive to the extent that they were reported to have not walked for longer than 20 min a day [26, 30].

Diabetes

The prevalence of diabetes is high within the GCC countries. Five systematic reviews have reported such a prevalence based on sample size, >500, mainly from national surveys. Most of the studies use the WHO definition for diabetes [21, 24, 2628]. However, several studies within the reviews combined both types of diabetes (type 1 and type 2). The prevalence among women in the GCC ranges between 6 and 44%, averaging 21% [26]. Studies (before the year 2000) report low prevalence of diabetes while reviews citing more recent studies report higher prevalence rates. For example, the review by Alhyas et al. which includes relatively new data shows higher prevalence of diabetes [24]. The prevalence of diabetes in the GCC region is higher among people above 50 [24, 26]. Unlike obesity, there is no clear gender gap in diabetes (See Table 4).

Hypertension (HTN)

Four systematic reviews reported the prevalence of HTN in women in the GCC [23, 26,27,28]. An additional study did not take gender into consideration [25]. HTN among Qatari women ranges from 31.7 to 33.6%, while 33–43% of women between 50 and 69 years old were hypertensive in Bahrain. Two studies within the reviews in UAE report contradictory results.

The Aljefree and Ahmed review reports a prevalence between 20.9 to 53% while Ng, Shu Wen et al., estimated the prevalence of HTN between 7.8% to 11.2%. This result was based on self-reported data, whereas HTN measured in the same region was 32.4% [28]. Similarly, blood pressure values measured among Omani women are higher compared to selfreports (31.1% vs 6.1%) [28]. Self-reported HTN underestimates the actual prevalence of HTN because of its non-symptomatic appearance. As for Saudi Arabia, Motlagh and colleagues reported that the HTN prevalence among Saudi women ranged from 3.7% to 22.1% between 1996 and 1997 [27]. More recent studies in the review conducted by Aljefree and Ahmed show a range between 23.9% and 33.5% [26]. There were a limited number of studies that reported the prevalence among the Kuwaiti population within these reviews. With regards to gender differences, several studies have revealed slightly greater prevalence of HTN in men [20, 25, 26, 31].

Smoking

Three reviews have reported the prevalence of smoking [26, 27, 32]. It is generally lower among women than men within the GCC region. Motlagh et al., showed that women from Qatar and Bahrain have a higher prevalence of smoking than in other GCC countries at 11.6 and 9.2% respectively, while in Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Kuwait, the prevalence ranged between 0.5 and 1.6% [27]. Aljefree & Ahmed found in their review that the prevalence of smoking among women in Saudi Arabia in 2003 was 9%, while in Oman it was 0.5%, 0.8% in UAE, 7.9% in Kuwait, and the highest prevalence was in Bahrain (20.7%), which was mainly water pipe smoking [26]. Currently, though, water pipe smoking is increasing among GCC women. The majority of the GCC countries have a similar prevalence of water-pipe smoking, which is around 3% of women. Only one study states that the percentage of Saudi women smoking water pipes is 11% [32].

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS)

The overall prevalence of MetS among women in the GCC countries is reported by Mabry et al. using the definitions of the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III)Footnote 1 and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF).Footnote 2 Based on ATP III criteria, the prevalence of MetS in the UAE is high (42.7% ATP III), 42% ATP III among Saudi women, and an ATP III score of 32.1% in Qatari women. The lowest prevalence, however, can be found among Omani women, with 23% ATP III [33]. The prevalence in some countries has been reported using IDF criteria instead of ATP III. In UAE, it is 45.9% IDF while in Qatar it is 37.3% IDF, and the lowest is in Kuwait at 36.1% IDF according to the studies we examined. No data on prevalence of MetS among female population in Bahrain was reported.

Discussion

Our review showed that the prevalence of major lifestylerelated risk factors for CVD is very high among women in GCC countries and seem to be increasing over the past decades.

Obesity among Arab women is highly prevalent, with the greatest increase reported in the literature among Middle Eastern countries in the six GCC countries [34]. The prevalence of obesity among women in GCC countries is higher than in countries such as Iraq, Libya, Algeria as well as European countries [35]. With regards to the marital status, married women within the GCC are more susceptible to obesity than unmarried one [35]; one of the possible reasons is that married couples are less active and tend to eat together, which may reinforce increased food intake [36]. The WHO has announced that Gulf countries have the highest prevalence of obesity, mainly among Kuwaiti, KSA, and Bahraini women [37]. The Middle East is recording the fastest increase in obesity prevalence over time, with more women than men being obese [34]. This may be attributed to multiple factors; for example the majority of households in this region, especially in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, commonly hire housemaids which could lead to low activity and sedentary lifestyle [38]. In addition, high consumption of fast foods (high in fat and carbohydrates) combined with a sedentary lifestyle which are norms in today’s GCC have played an important role in increasing levels of obesity in recent years [39, 40]. Multiple pregnancies can also contribute to weight gain, as women may retain an average of 4.5kg after each birth [41].

Physical inactivity is a global public health problem. Around 31% of adults aged 15 and over were insufficiently active in 2008, with women being less active than men (34% vs 28%) [42]. Physical inactivity is very common in the Muslim world especially among Arabs. Based on data from 163,556 participants in 38 Muslim countries, Arab women were more likely to be physically inactive than non-Arab women (Odds Ratio=2.15, 95% CI: 2.09–2.21) [43]. Also, in a study conducted by Daryani et al, Arab immigrants in Sweden reported a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity than Swedish-born women, and a high degree of physical inactivity during leisure time, highlighting potential cultural factors [44]. Sedentary lifestyle is very common, especially among women in the Middle Eastern countries. This could be due to various reasons. In countries such as Saudi Arabia, physical education was not included in the public girl’s school curriculum until early 2013 and women are still forbidden from driving, which limits their access to fitness centers [45]. Other barriers may include the desert climate, high temperatures and frequent sand storms, which makes it difficult to exercise outdoors, the lack of social support, and the common use of cheap migrant labor for household work [46].

Diabetes is a complex disease that is linked between multiple genetic and environmental factors including diet, lifestyle, and obesity [47]. Several studies show that Arabs have a greater genetic predisposition to diabetes than Caucasians [48, 49]. In Saudi Arabia, like other GCC countries, the prevalence of consanguinity is as high as 60%, which is considered the highest rate of consanguineous marriages in the world [50, 51] and has contributed to the high prevalence of diabetes within the GCC countries [52, 53]. Additionally, the fast urbanization and increased per capita income have had negative influences on GGC lifestyle resulting in increased sedentary lifestyle, leading to obesity [54]. Obesity is a major risk factor for developing diabetes, where in many cases, more than half of the diabetic patients were found to be obese [55, 56]. From a cost perspective, Saudi Arabia spends 21% of their total health expenditure on diabetes, with other GCC countries spending between 16 and 19% [57].

The prevalence of HTN was also high among women in GCC countries. Data from the Second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2) showed that 47.2% of the registered individuals were hypertensive, and women were more likely to have HTN than men [13, 58]. In 2014 El Bcheraoui et al., reported the prevalence of HTN from a large national health survey of more than 10,000 households throughout KSA. The overall prevalence was 15.2% of those with hypertension were found to be undiagnosed [59]. Underreporting should not be ruled out, as many of the studies included collected self-reported data [28]. Likewise, a study published in Saudi Arabia also showed that almost 40% of people affected by HTN were unaware of their disease at the time of the survey [60].

Low prevalence of smoking among women in the GCC countries could be an indication of under reporting, as smoking cigarettes traditionally is not accepted among Arab Muslim women, especially in the GCC countries [61]. In contrast, the acceptance and popularity of water pipe smoking is very common among Arabs in general, especially women [6266]. There is also a false perception that water pipe smoking is less harmful than cigarettes [67]. Up to this point, the data shows a growing trend of women smoking water pipes in the GCC countries, but it is still less than other neighboring Arab countries [32].

Limitations

The heterogeneity of the reviewed studies and variable availability of sub-group data was a major limitation in the review process within the GCC countries. We presented the actual reported percentage or the range of percentages in the cited studies that pertain to the prevalence of CVD risk factors among women. However, some studies do not report the actual percentage pertaining to the women studied and just presents the total percentage of both genders or male population only. Some studies were mixing adult and children within their included studies, hence some reported low prevalence. Moreover, some studies do not cover all the six members of the GCC countries, with some systematic reviews that present data from only two to three countries in the GCC region.

Policy implications

This review indicated high levels of modifiable risk factors among women. Gender inequality damages the physical and mental health of millions of women across the globe. A continuous rising prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases increases the need for gender equality throughout the GCC countries, especially for Saudi Arabian women, to empower them in regards to their role in the society, their decision-making and more involvement in health care. Obesity is the major risk factor of CVDs in GCC countries and linked too many other NCDs. Women in GCC countries are facing a major struggle in challenging physical inactivity, which results in one of the highest obesity rates globally. Al-Bahilani and Mabry reported the legislations and policies issued by the GCC in regards behavioral risk of NCD, where most of them were related to tobacco control. However, in regards to the prevention of NCDs, only six policies have been addressed by the GCC’s ministries of health [68]. In 2012–2013, the GCC Secretary General, implemented short and long-term action plans to tackle NCDs, where short-term actions included “incentives and disincentives (such as taxes on tobacco), regulations (for example, limiting the availability of unhealthy food in schools), and clinical interventions (for instance, screening the population for risk factors)” [10].

Introducing a more active lifestyle by expanding the field of physical education through the GCC region and sports competitiveness among women is highly recommended. It is important to present a more elementary approach in measuring obesity levels by reporting central obesity with the combination of BMI, waist circumference and waist/hip ratio to obtain more accurate results. There is a high requirement for diet control and awareness in regards to total daily calorie intake. Although food labeling was introduced by the GCC customs union, the labeling requirements are basic and do not require regulations regarding the nutrition content of processed foods, such as sodium content and trans-fat [68]. Additionally, the direct and indirect costs of care and treatment of patients suffering from these diseases are significant and will become more burdensome as the price of oil has declined, and is likely to remain at lower levels due to the increased global supply. The data suggest that applying preventative measures for diabetes and CVD would potentially save 54% of the direct costs and 31% of the total cost of treatment. This results in not only a significant savings, but improved quality of life for the patients [10] and magnifies why the healthcare sector needs to focus more on preventable measures, such as motivating society to adopt healthy lifestyles. Implementing the health belief model and understanding health-related behavior among the female population in the GCC countries in regards to CVD and its risk factors would help in understanding why women are not adopting a healthier lifestyle.

Conclusion

The high prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases among women population in GCC is a ticking time bomb and is reaching alarming levels, and require a fundamental social, cutural and political changes. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive work among the GCC to strengthen the regulatory framework to reduce and control the prevalence of these factors.

Notes

  1. 1.

    NCEP ATP III definition, metabolic syndrome is present if three or more of the following five criteria are met: waist circumference over 40 in. (men) or 35 in. (women), blood pressure over 130/85 mmHg, fasting triglyceride level over 150 mg/dl, fasting high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less than 40 mg/dl (men) or 50 mg/dl (women) and fasting blood sugar over 100 mg/dl.

  2. 2.

    IDF definition includes the same general criteria as the other definition; it requires that obesity, but not necessarily insulin resistance, be present.

Abbreviations

AHA:

American heart association

AMSTAR:

Assessment of multiple systematic review tool

ATP III:

Adult treatment panel III

BMI:

Body mass index

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

DALYs:

Disability-adjusted life years

GCC:

Gulf cooperation council

HBM:

Health belief model

HTN:

Hypertension

IDF:

International diabetes federation

KSA:

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

MetS:

Metabolic syndrome

NCEP:

National cholesterol education program

UAE:

United Arab Emirates

WHO:

World health organization

References

  1. 1.

    Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Carter A, et al. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1459–544.

  2. 2.

    Mendis S, Puska P, Norrving B. Global Atlas on cardiovascular disease prevention and control [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241564373_eng.pdf]

  3. 3.

    Bitton A, Gaziano TA. The Framingham Heart Study's impact on global risk assessment. Prog. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010;53(1):68–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease Guidelines for assessment and management of cardiovascular risk [http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/guidelines/Full text.pdf]

  5. 5.

    Chomistek AK, Chiuve SE, Eliassen AH, Mukamal KJ, Willett WC, Rimm EB. Healthy lifestyle in the primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease among young women. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015;65(1):43–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Who J, Consultation FE. Diet, Physical Activity and Health [http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/trs916/intro/en/]

  7. 7.

    SecretariatGeneraloftheGulfCooperationCouncil. The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf [http://www.gcc-sg.org/en-us/Pages/default.aspx]

  8. 8.

    Sturm M, Strasky J, Adolf P, Peschel D. The Gulf Cooperation Council Countries-Economic Structures, Recent Developments and Role in the Global Economy. ECB occasional paper. 2008;92

  9. 9.

    Alkhamis A, Hassan A, Cosgrove P. Financing healthcare in Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a focus on Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Health Plann. Manag. 2014;29(1):e64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chahine G, Bitar J, Assouad P, Abi Chaker S. The $68 billion challenge, quantifying and tackling the burden of chronic diseases in the GCC. Illinois: Booz & Co. 2013. Available from: [http://www.booz.com/me/home/thought_leadership_strategy/reports_and_white_papers_me/display/the-68-billiondollar-challenge?cm_mid=3108890&cm_crmid=95462fe6-3e45-475a-bb64-5f541513f176&cm_medium=email] Accessed 24 Mar 2014.

  11. 11.

    Rahim HF, Sibai A, Khader Y, Hwalla N, Fadhil I, Alsiyabi H, et al. Non-communicable diseases in the Arab world. Lancet. 2014;383(9914):356–67.

  12. 12.

    Shehab A, Al-Dabbagh B, AlHabib KF, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Almahmeed W, Sulaiman K, et al. Gender disparities in the presentation, management and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients: data from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2). PloS one. 2013;8(2):e55508.

  13. 13.

    Alhabib KF, Sulaiman K, Al-Motarreb A, Almahmeed W, Asaad N, Amin H, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and long-term outcomes of Middle Eastern patients in the Second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE-2). Ann Saudi Med. 2012;32(1):9–18.

  14. 14.

    Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Dagenais G, Diaz R, et al. Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet. 2011;378(9798):1231–43.

  15. 15.

    World Health Organization. Women and health: today's evidence tomorrow's agenda [http://www.who.int/gender/women_health_report/full_report_20091104_en.pdf]

  16. 16.

    Baliamoune-Lutz M, McGillivray M. Does Gender Inequality Reduce Growth in Sub-Saharan African and Arab Countries?*. Afr. Dev. Rev. 2009;21(2):224–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2011;11(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, Boers M, Andersson N, Hamel C, et al. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2007;7:10.

  19. 19.

    Zabetian A, Keli HM, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Narayan KM, Ali MK. Diabetes in the Middle East and North Africa. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2013;101(2):106–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tailakh A, Evangelista LS, Mentes JC, Pike NA, Phillips LR, Morisky DE. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, and control in Arab countries: a systematic review. Nurs. Health Sci. 2014;16(1):126–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Alharbi NS, Almutari R, Jones S, Al-Daghri N, Khunti K, de Lusignan S. Trends in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity in the Arabian Gulf States: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2014;106(2):e30–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Musaiger AO. Overweight and obesity in eastern mediterranean region: prevalence and possible causes. J. Obes. 2011;2011:407237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Musaiger AO, Al-Hazzaa HM. Prevalence and risk factors associated with nutrition-related noncommunicable diseases in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:199–217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Alhyas L, McKay A, Majeed A. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the States of the co-operation council for the Arab States of the Gulf: a systematic review. PloS one. 2012;7(8):e40948.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Alhyas L, McKay A, Balasanthiran A, Majeed A. Prevalences of overweight, obesity, hyperglycaemia, hypertension and dyslipidaemia in the Gulf: systematic review. JRSM Short Rep. 2011;2(7):55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Aljefree N, Ahmed F. Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Associated Risk Factors among Adult Population in the Gulf Region: A Systematic Review. Adv Public Health. 2015;2015:23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Motlagh B, O'Donnell M, Yusuf S. Prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in the Middle East: a systematic review. Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 2009;16(3):268–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ng SW, Zaghloul S, Ali HI, Harrison G, Popkin BM. The prevalence and trends of overweight, obesity and nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in the Arabian Gulf States. Obes. Rev. 2011;12(1):1–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, Mullany EC, Biryukov S, Abbafati C, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384(9945):766–81.

  30. 30.

    Badran M, Laher I. Obesity in arabic-speaking countries. J Obes. 2011;2011:686430.

  31. 31.

    Jeffery RW, Rick AM. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between body mass index andmarriage-related factors. ObesRes. 2002;10(8):809–15.

  32. 32.

    World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight: Factsheet No 311. Updated June 2016. [http://www.emro.who.int/health-topics/obesity/].

  33. 33.

    AL Nohair S. Obesity in gulf countries. Int J Health Sci. 2014;8(1):79–83.

  34. 34.

    Hurt RT, Kulisek C, Buchanan LA, McClave SA. The obesity epidemic: challenges, health initiatives, and implications for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2010;6(12):780–92.

  35. 35.

    Musaiger AO. Over weight and obesity in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: can we control it? East Mediterr Health J. 2004;10(6):789–93.

  36. 36.

    Khashoggi RH, Madani KA, Ghaznawy HI, Ali MA. Socio economic factors affecting the prevalence of obesity among female patients attending primary health centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Ecol food Nutr. 1994;31(3–4):277–83.

  37. 37.

    Al-Nozha MM, Al-Hazzaa HM, Arafah MR, Al-Khadra A, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Khan NB, Al-Marzouki K, Al-Harthi SS, Abdullah M, et al. Prevalence of physical activity and inactivity among Saudis aged 30-70 years. A population-based cross-sectional study. Saudi Med J. 2007;28(4):559–68.

  38. 38.

    Mabry RM, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, Owen N. Evidence of physical activity participation among men and women in the countries of the Gulf cooperation council: a review.Obesity Rev. 2010;11(6):457–64.

  39. 39.

    World Health Organization, 2012. Physical inactivity: a global public health problem. 2010. [http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_inactivity/en/].

  40. 40.

    Kahan D. Adult physical inactivity prevalence in the Muslim world: Analysis of 38 countries. Prev Med Rep. 2015;2:71–5.

  41. 41.

    Daryani A, Berglund L, Andersson A, Kocturk T, BeckerW, Vessby B. Risk factors for coronary heart disease among immigrant women from Iran and Turkey, compared towomen of Swedish ethnicity. Ethn Dis. 2005;15(2):213–20.

  42. 42.

    Al-Eisa ES, Al-Sobayel HI. Physical activity and health beliefs among Saudi Women. J Nutr Metab. 2012;2012:642187.

  43. 43.

    Benjamin K, Donnelly TT. Barriers and facilitators influencing the physical activity of Arabic adults: A literature review. Avicenna 2013;8:1–16.

  44. 44.

    Hu FB. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(6):1249–57.

  45. 45.

    ShaatN, Ekelund M, Lernmark A, Ivarsson S, Nilsson A, Perfekt R, Berntorp K, Groop L. Genotypic and phenotypic differences between Arabian and Scandinavian women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2004; 47(5):878–84.

  46. 46.

    Ahlqvist E, Ahluwalia TS, Groop L. Genetics of type 2 diabetes. Clin Chem. 2011;57(2):241–54.

  47. 47.

    Tadmouri GO, Nair P, Obeid T, Al Ali MT, Al Khaja N, Hamamy HA. Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs. Reprod Health. 2009;6:17.

  48. 48.

    Gosadi IM, Goyder EC, Teare MD. Investigating the potential effect of consanguinity on type 2 diabetes susceptibility in a Saudi population. Hum Hered. 2014;77(1–4):197–206.

  49. 49.

    Abuyassin B, Laher I. Obesity-linked diabetes in the Arab world: a review. East Mediterr Health J. 2015;21(6):420–39.

  50. 50.

    Sherif S, Sumpio BE. Economic development and diabetes prevalence in MENA countries: Egypt and Saudi Arabia comparison. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(2):304–11.

  51. 51.

    Klautzer L, Becker J, Mattke S. The curse ofwealth - Middle Eastern countries need to address therapidly rising burden of diabetes. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014;2(3):109–14.

  52. 52.

    Memish ZA, El Bcheraoui C, Tuffaha M, Robinson M, Daoud F, Jaber S, Mikhitarian S, Al Saeedi M, Al Mazroa MA, Mokdad AH, et al. Obesity and associated factors–Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E174.

  53. 53.

    Musaiger ASN. The relationship between obesity and prevalence of chronic diseases in the Arab women. J Hum Ecol Special. 2005;13:97–100.

  54. 54.

    Al-Rubeaan K. The impact of diabetes mellitus on health and economy of Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Diabetes Manag. 2014;4(4):381–90.

  55. 55.

    Alshaikh MK, Filippidis FT, Baldove JP, Majeed A, Rawaf S. Women in Saudi Arabia and the Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Systematic Review. J Environ Public Health. 2016;2016:15.

  56. 56.

    El Bcheraoui C, Memish ZA, Tuffaha M, Daoud F, Robinson M, Jaber S, Mikhitarian S, Al Saeedi M, Al Mazroa MA, Mokdad AH, et al. Hypertension and its associated risk factors in the kingdom of saudi arabia, 2013: a national survey. Int J Hypertens. 2014;2014:564679.

  57. 57.

    Alsuwaida A, Alghonaim M. Gender disparities in the awareness and control of hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2011;33(5):354–7.

  58. 58.

    Ali WM, Al Habib KF, Hersi A, Asaad N, Sulaiman K, Al-Shiek-Ali A, et al. In-hospital complications and 1-year outcome of acute coronary syndrome in patients with hypertension: findings from the 2nd Gulf Registry of Acute Cardiac Events. East Mediterr. Health J. 2012;18(9):902–10.

  59. 59.

    Akl EA, Gunukula SK, Aleem S, Obeid R, Jaoude PA, Honeine R, Irani J. The prevalence of waterpipe tobacco smokingamong the general and specific populations: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:244.

  60. 60.

    Islam SM, Johnson CA. Correlates of smoking behavior among Muslim Arab-American adolescents. Ethn Health. 2003;8(4):319–37.

  61. 61.

    Maziak W, Fouad FM, Asfar T,Hammal F, Bachir EM, Rastam S, Eissenberg T, Ward KD.Prevalence and characteristics of narghile smoking among university students in Syria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis.2004;8(7):882–9.

  62. 62.

    Azab M, OF K, Alkaraki AK, Eissenberg T, Alzoubi KH, Primack BA. Water pipe tobacco smoking among university students in Jordan. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(6):606–12.

  63. 63.

    Labib N, Radwan G, Mikhail N, Mohamed MK, Setouhy ME, Loffredo C, Israel E. Comparison of cigarette and water pipe smoking among female university students in Egypt. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007;9(5):591–6.

  64. 64.

    Dar-Odeh NS, Abu-Hammad OA. The changing trends in tobacco smoking for young Arab women; narghile, an old habit with a liberal attitude. Harm Reduct J. 2011;8:24.

  65. 65.

    Soweid RA. Lebanon: water pipe line to youth. Tob Control. 2005;14(6):363–4.

  66. 66.

    Nuwayhid IA, Yamout B, Azar G, Kambris MA. Narghile (hubble-bubble) smoking, low birth weight, and other pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(4):375–83.

  67. 67.

    Mabry RM, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, Owen N. Gender differences in prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: a systematic review. Diabetic Medicine. 2010;27(5):593–7.

  68. 68.

    Al-Bahlani S, Mabry R. Preventing non-communicable disease in Oman, a legislative review. Health Promot Int. 2014;29(Suppl 1):i83–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like thank Ms. Juren Baldove (Department of Critical Care, King Saud University Medical City. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for all the help in data extraction.

Funding

This research was supported by sponsorship provided to Mashael K Alshaikh, by King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The Department of Primary Care and Public Health at Imperial College London is grateful for support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research & Care (CLAHRC) scheme, the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre scheme, and the Imperial Centre for Patient Safety and Service Quality.

Authors’ contributions

MA, FF and SR prepared the study protocol. This included designing the search strategy, helping in selecting studies for inclusion and developing a data extraction form. MA and HA also helped in selecting studies for inclusion. MA and HA carried out the search, identified potential studies for inclusion, extracted the data, assessed the quality of the included studies, and carried out the data analysis under the supervision of SR and AM and FF wrote the manuscript, which was then revised by SR, AM and AS. All the authors have approved the final version. The guarantor is MA.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mashael K. Alshaikh.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alshaikh, M.K., Filippidis, F.T., Al-Omar, H.A. et al. The ticking time bomb in lifestyle-related diseases among women in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries; review of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 17, 536 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4331-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Noncommunicable diseases
  • Obesity
  • Diabetes
  • Hypertension
  • Smoking
  • Physical inactivity
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Systematic review