Open Access

Insecticide treated nets use and its determinants among settlers of Southwest Ethiopia

BMC Public HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:106

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2768-8

Received: 23 February 2015

Accepted: 22 January 2016

Published: 1 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Ethiopia is rapidly increasing insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) coverage to combat malaria, but adequate follow-up and factors affecting use of ITNs is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess determinants of the use of ITNs in a southwest area of Ethiopia.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey was conducted in the Chewaka district settlement area of southwest Oromia from March to May, 2013. Kebeles were stratified by degree of urbanization (rural, peri-urban, or urban). Randomly selected households, which had been freely supplied with at least one ITN, were surveyed using a pre-tested, structured questionnaire administered through household interviews. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between use of ITNs and determinant factors.

Results

Of 574 households surveyed, 72.6 % possessed ITNs and 80 % of these had been used the night before the survey. The most common reasons for the absence ITNs in the household identified in this study were ITNs were old and therefore discarded and that households use ITNs for purposes other than their intended use. The multivariate analysis found that knowledge of malaria transmission by mosquito bites (Adjusted OR = 3.44, 95 % CI: 1.80–6.59), and washing of ITNs at least once by households (Adjusted OR = 2.66, 95 % CI: 1.35–5.26) were significantly associated with an ITN being used by households. The mean possession was 1.59 ITN per household (3.57 persons per an ITN). One hundred fifty four (36.9 %) of ITNs had at least one hole/tear. Among these, 108 (70.1 %) ITNs had at least one hole/tear with greater than 2 cm and 29 (18.8 %) had greater than seven holes/tears.

Conclusions

This study in Southwest Ethiopia showed a high proportion of net ownership compared to a household survey from Ethiopia which included in the World Malaria Report. Despite somewhat high percentages ITN ownership, the study demonstrated there was still a gap between ownership and use of ITNs. Use of ITNs was affected by knowledge of malaria transmission by mosquito bite and washing of ITNs at least once by households. Intensive health education and community mobilization efforts should be employed to attempt to influence these factors that significantly affect ITN use.

Keywords

ITN utilization Settlers Malaria prevention Ethiopia

Background

Malaria remains a major public health problem particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2012, malaria was responsible for over 1.1 million deaths globally [1] and was endemic in 104 countries with substantial geographic disparities. Around 81 % of the malaria incidence and 91 % of the malaria deaths in 2010 occurred in Africa [2]. Approximately 52 million people in Ethiopia (approximately 68 % of the national population) live in malaria risk areas, primarily at altitudes below 2000 m [3]. In Oromia 75 % of the land is considered malarious, accounting for over 17 million people at risk of infection [4].

Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) are a means of malaria control and prevention [5]. The impact of ITNs on reducing malaria episodes is well documented [6, 7]. Use of ITNs is one of the major vector control measures in Ethiopia. More than 20 million ITNs were distributed between 2005 and 2007, enabling 68 % of the households living in malaria-endemic areas to own at least one ITN. Indeed, 15 million ITNs were distributed in 2010 and 2011 to replace long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) distributed previously [3, 8]. Beyond household possession of ITNs, it is crucial to understand household use of ITNs. The ITNs that are available at a household level may be left unused; or alternatively, even if ITNs are used, usage may be intermittent and/or vulnerable members of the household may not be given priority. The maximum malaria reduction impact of ITNs will only be achieved if people acquire nets, treat/re-treat them, make sure that the most vulnerable household members sleep under them, and use nets through the year [9].

Studies in various African countries, including Ethiopia, have revealed discrepancies between ITN possession and use [8, 1012]. Yet, there is no properly documented evidence regarding the coverage and use of ITNs among settlers in malaria-prone areas. This study was designed to investigate the possession, use, and factors affecting use of ITNs in the Chewaka district settlement area. This study also helped to evaluate the local ITN programs with reference to the Abuja targets.

Methods

Study setting and design

This cross sectional survey was conducted in Chewaka district settlement, located approximately 566 km from Addis Ababa in the Southwest Oromia Region of Ethiopia. It has a total population of 65,850, with people residing in 28 kebeles. The climatic condition of the area is a tropical zone referred to as ‘cola’. It accounts 54.22 km2 of land area which is all the land masses are suitable for settlement. The annual temperature and rainfall varies from 37 to 40°c and 1000 to 1200 mm respectively, and the altitude ranges from 900 to 1400 m above sea level. There is known the successful settlement in Oromia and by sesame seed production. The main rivers in the area include the Didesa and Dabana, which are tributaries of the Abay River. In the district there are three health centers, twenty seven health posts, eighteen clinics and one drug vendor (Chewaka district annual health office report, unpublished).

Sample size and sampling technique

The sample size for the survey was calculated by using the formula for a single population proportion, including a 95 % CI, 5 % margin of error, and estimate of 73 % of household using ITNs based on a previous study in Ethiopia [13]. With a 5 % adjustment for non-response rate and a design effect of 2, the resulting calculation for a total sample size was 636 households. The study employed a multi-stage sampling technique, taking into consideration that socio-demographic factors affecting ITN use might differ based on the household’s distance from the district town. The 28 malarious kebeles of the district were first stratified into three groups (urban, semi-urban, and rural kebeles), and then six kebeles were randomly selected by lottery method by proportional allocation to size (1 from the first, 2 from the second and 3 from the third stratum). Health extension workers (HEWs) distributed ITNs to the community at their vicinity/households during free mass-distribution campaigns. Households were randomly selected from a list provided by the district administration

Data collection method and analysis

Data were collected by diploma health professionals after training using a pretested, structured questionnaire prepared in English and then translated into the local language of Afan Oromo. The questionnaire was adopted from instruments developed by the Roll Back Malaria (RBM) partnership Monitoring and Evaluation Reference Group by the WHO and UNICEF [14]. Data collection was conducted during the peak malaria transmission period, from March to May, 2013. Data collectors administered the questionnaire through household visits. Information was primarily collected from the head of households (father or mother), or if this was not possible, from another adult household member. The condition of household nets was inspected by use of a checklist. Data was entered using Epidata version 3.1 and Stata version 11.0 was used for analysis. Descriptive statistics provided means and percentages related to socio-demographic characteristics; knowledge of malaria transmission and prevention; and possession, use, and condition of ITNs. Through logistic regression, adjusted odds ratios were calculated to identify predictors of ITN use.

Ethical consideration

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Mettu University Faculty of Public Health and Medical Sciences Institutional Research Ethics Review Committee, as well as from the zonal and woreda-level health offices. Before each interview, researchers sought consent from each respondent.

Results

Socio demographic characteristics

A total of 574 households participated in this study with a response rate of 90.3 %, of which 377 (65.7 %) were heads of households. The majority of the respondents 352 (61.3 %) were female. The mean (SD) age of the respondents was 30.6 (8.9) years and the mean (SD) family size was 5.7 (2.2). Of the total households, 470 (81.9 %) had at least one child under 5 years of age (in total 703) and 86 (15 %) had pregnant women (one in each household). A majority of respondents (379 or 66 %) were illiterate (unable to read and write) and 414 (72.1 %) were farmers (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristic of respondents in Chewaka district, South West Ethiopia, 2014

Variables (n = 574)

Frequency

Percent

Sex

 Male

222

38.7

 Female

352

61.3

Age (years)

 15–29

286

49.8

 30-44

237

41.3

  ≥ 45

51

8.9

Marital Status

 Single

50

8.7

 Married

507

88.3

 Divorced

10

1.8

 Widowed

7

1.2

Educational level

 Illiterate

379

66

 Literate

195

34

Occupation

 Student

31

5.4

 House wife

70

12.2

 Governmental Employee

19

3.3

 Merchant

35

6.1

 Farmer

414

72.1

 Other

5

0.9

Monthly income of HH (birr)

  < 100

13

2.3

 100–299

129

22.5

 300–499

167

29.1

 500–799

149

26

  > 799

116

20.2

Family Size

 Less than three

35

6.1

 Three to four

158

27.5

 Five to six

179

31.2

 Seven and above

202

35.2

Presence of radio in the HH

 No

293

51.1

 Yes

281

48.9

Presence of television in the HH

 No

544

94.8

 Yes

30

5.2

Knowledge of respondents about malaria transmission and prevention

From the total respondents, 342 (59.6 %) mentioned mosquitoes bite as the main mode of transmission for malaria. The other means of transmission reported included (232, 40.4 %): living near stagnant water (138, 24.0 %), feeling cold (16, 2.7 %), presence of waste (35, 6.1 %), drinking dirty water (24, 4.2 %), being hungry and being in the rain (both 9, 1.6 % respectively). The majority of respondents (208, 39.3 %) reported ITNs as the main preventive measure against malaria; followed by proper waste disposal (89,16.8 %), taking tablets (85,16.1 %), use of aerosol sprays (59,11.2 %), drainage of breeding sites (59,11.2 %), use of traditional remedies (19,3.6 %), and fumigation (9, 1.7 %). The majority (495, 86.2 %) of respondents had ever heard/seen messages about ITNs. Most (56598.4 %) of the respondents believed that sleeping under an ITN is beneficial, and only 42 (7.3 %) respondents reported problems associated with sleeping under an ITN (Table 2).
Table 2

Knowledge of respondents about the transmission mechanism and preventive measures of malaria, ITN awareness and associated factors in Chewaka district, South West Ethiopia, 2014

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Main transmission mechanism of malaria (n = 574)

 Bitten by mosquito

342

59.6

 Living near collected water

138

24.0

 Feeling cold

16

2.7

 Presence of wastes

35

6.1

 Drinking dirty water

24

4.2

 Being hungry

9

1.6

 Being in the rain

9

1.6

 Other

1

0.2

Main preventive measures of malaria (n = 529)

 Use of ITN

208

39.3

 Take tablet

85

16.1

 Proper disposal of wastes

89

16.8

 Use of traditional remedies

19

3.6

 Fumigants

9

1.7

 Use insecticide spray

59

11.2

 Drainage

59

11.2

 Others

1

0.2

Ever heard education messages about ITNs (n = 574)

 No

79

13.8

 Yes

495

86.2

Think that sleeping under ITN have benefit (n = 574)

 No

9

1.6

 Yes

565

98.4

The benefits of sleeping under ITN (n = 565)

 Don’t get bitten by mosquito

274

48.5

 Don’t get bothered by other mosquito

95

16.8

 Don’t get malaria

191

33.8

 To get warmth

5

0.9

Believe that sleeping under ITN has problem (n = 574)

 No

532

92.7

 Yes

42

7.3

Problems associated with sleeping under ITNs (n = 42)

 Difficult to get at night

18

42.9

 It is too hot to sleep under ITNs

14

33.3

 It takes time to tuck a net each night

5

11.9

 Mosquito can still bite through ITN

4

9.5

 No enough air when sleeping under

1

2.4

ITN possession and use

All households (n = 574) that participated in this study were freely provided with at least one ITN by the district health office. Two hundred ninety seven (51.7 %) households were supplied with one, 215 (37.5 %) with two, 61 (10.6 %) with three ITNs and 1 (0.2) with four ITNs. In total, 914 ITNs were supplied to the households included in this study. Of these, 731 (80 %) were reported as being used by households. Use varied among strata at 75 %, 84.9 % and 82.7 % for rural, semi urban and urban strata respectively. Among ITNs that were used, about 37.4 % had at least one hole. Mean possession was 1.59 ITNs per household (3.57 people per an ITN).

ITNs were not found in 157 (27.4 %) households at the time of the survey. The reasons for absence of ITNs included: lost or stolen (24, 15.3 %), used for other purposes (e.g. storage of sorghum, to make fences, protect bulls from insect bites) (46, 29.3 %), and thrown away as old (84, 53.5 %), and gave to others (3, 1.9 %).In addition, 20 (4.8 %) of the households did not use their nets due to: hot to sleep under the net (7, 35 %), housing construction problems (lack of appropriate place for hanging the net) (6, 30 %), absence of mosquitoes (2, 10 %), fear of its toxicity (2, 10 %), absence of bed (2, 10 %), and perception that ITN could not prevent malaria (1, 5 %). This implies that 334 (80 %) of the households used at least one of their freely supplied ITNs. The night before the day of the survey, 77.4 % (418) of all children under five and 75 % (54) of all pregnant women slept under an ITN (Table 3).
Table 3

ITN possession and utilization by households in Chewaka district, South West Ethiopia, 2014

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Number of ITNs freely supplied for HHs

 One/HH

297

51.7

 Two/HH

215

37.5

 Three/HH

61

10.6

 Four/HH

1

0.2

Utilization of ITNs by HHs

 Currently used

334

80.1

 Not used

83

19.9

Availability of at least one freely supplied ITNs

 No

157

27.4

 Yes

417

72.6

Reason for unavailability

Lost/stolen

24

15.3

 Used for other purpose

46

29.3

 Old then thrown away

84

53.5

 Given to others

3

1.9

Households reported use at least one of their available ITNs

 No

20

4.8

 Yes

397

95.2

Frequency of using their ITNs

 Consistently throughout the year

278

70

 Intermittently

119

30

Time they use intermittently (n = 119)

 During rain

92

77.3

 After rain

7

5.9

 As they like

2

1.7

 When hearing mosquito buzzing

18

15.1

Reason for not using the available ITNs (n = 20)

 Absence of mosquito

2

10

 Absence of bed

2

10

 ITNs do not prevent malaria

1

5

 Afraid of its toxicity

2

10

 ITNs too hot to sleep under it

7

35

 Housing structure affects ITN use

6

30

Children under 5 years age slept under ITN in previous night (n = 540)

 No

122

22.6

 Yes

418

77.4

Pregnant women slept under ITNs previous night (72)

 No

18

25

 Yes

54

75

The condition of ITNs

Among households who owned ITNs (n = 417) at the time of the survey, 305 (73.1 %) had been washed at least once and100 (24 %) had been washed three or more times. One hundred fifty four (36.9 %) ITNs had at least one hole/tear. Among these, 29 (18.8 %) ITNs had greater than seven holes/tears and 108 (70.1 %) ITNs had at least one hole/tear greater than 2 cm (Table 4).
Table 4

Condition of ITNs in households who owned ITNs, in Chewaka district, South West Ethiopia, 2014

Variables

Frequency

Percent

Age of ITNs (n = 417)

  < 1 year

188

45.1

 1–2 years

126

30.2

 >3 years

103

24.7

Shape (n = 417)

 Rectangular

413

99

 Conical

4

1

Color (n = 417)

  

 White

4

1

 Green

143

34.3

 Blue

270

64.7

ITNs ever been washed (n = 417)

 Yes

305

73.1

 No

112

26.9

Frequency of washing (n = 305)

 One to three times

232

76.1

 Four to six times

50

16.4

 Seven or more times

23

7.5

Presence of hole/tear on ITN (n = 417)

 Yes

154

36.9

 No

263

63.1

Number of holes/tears (n = 154)

 1-7

125

81.2

 >7

29

18.8

Size of holes/tears (n = 154)

  ≤ 2 cm

46

29.9

  > 2 cm

108

70.1

Determinants of ITN utilization

Factors associated with use of at least one ITN by households were knowledge of malaria transmission by mosquito bite (Adjusted OR = 3.44, 95 % CI: 1.80–6.59), and ITNs washed at least once by household (Adjusted OR = 2.66, 95 % CI: 1.35–5.26). Sex and age of respondents, number of ITNs freely supplied, presence of children under five / any children in the household, and age of ITNs were not associated with the use of ITNs by households, when use was adjusted for the other factors (Table 5).
Table 5

Final logistic regression model for household’s ITNs use in Chewaka settlement, South West Ethiopia, 2014

Variables

ITN Utilization Status

Crude OR (95 % CI)

Adjust OR (95 %) CI

No

Yes

Sex

 Female

61

196

1.00

1.00

 Male

22

138

1.95 (1.14–3.33)

1.60 (0.87–2.94)

Age (years)

 15–29

31

175

1.00

1.00

 30–44

40

136

0.60 (0.36–1.01)

0.59 (0.32–1.07)

  ≥ 45

12

23

0.33 (0.15–0.75)

0.54 (0.20–1.42)

Knowledge of malaria transmission by mosquito bites

 No

35

40

1.00

1.00

 Yes

48

294

5.36 (3.10–9.26)

3.44 (1.80–6.59)*

Number of ITNs freely supplied for HHs

 One/HH

30

174

1.00

1.00

 Two/HH

38

131

0.59 (0.35–1.01)

0.77 (0.43–1.40)

Three and above/HH

15

29

0.33 (0.16–0.69)

0.80 (0.33–1.92)

Age of ITNs

  < 1 year

49

139

1.00

1.00

 1-2 years

18

108

2.11 (1.16–3.84)

0.72 (0.33–1.57)

  > 3 years

16

87

1.92 (1.03–3.45)

0.76 (0.33–1.74)

ITNs ever been washed

 No

42

70

1.00

1.00

 Yes

41

264

3.86 (2.33–6.40)

2.66 (1.35–5.26) *

Is under five child/ children in the HH

 No

18

41

1.00

1.00

 Yes

65

293

1.98 (0.07–3.66)

1.35 (0.65–2.81)

* P < 0.05 - Significantly associated

Discussion

The study showed that ownership and use of ITNs in the study area were 72.6 % and 80.1 % respectively. The percentage of children under 5 years of age and pregnant women not using ITNs exceeded that of other adults. The two factors strongly associated with use of ITNs the night before the survey were knowledge of malaria transmission by mosquito bites and ITNs being washed at least once by households.

The proportion of households possessing ITNs was higher in this study compared to the average figure indicated in World Malaria Report of 2011 (median = 56 %) from household survey results [15]. This implies that the net distribution program is going well when compared to the Roll Back Malaria [16] and World Health Assembly targets [17]. In this study, use of ITNs was in line with WHO recommendation of 80 % utilization [15]. High rates of use achieved within a short period of time demonstrates acceptance of nets by users as a major malaria control tool and reflects the concerted efforts of the Ministry of Health. However, more than half of households had just a single net, and on average four individuals shared a single net. This issue requires great attention, because the national policy aims to provide one ITN for every sleeping space (approximately one net per 1.8 persons in malaria-endemic areas <2000 m) [15]. Hence, to attain sustainable control of the disease, households in the study area require extra nets to reduce the occupant per net gap.

The mode of malaria transmission identified by 59.6 % of respondents in this study was mosquito bites. This result is higher than the findings from a study in Wonago Woreda, Southern Ethiopia, where 42.3 % of respondents also listed mosquito bites [18]. But, less compared to a study done in Oromia and Amhara regional state, Ethiopia (67.9 %) [19]. Respondents’ perception of net use as a main preventive measure for malaria was also lower compared to a survey done in Southern Ethiopia [18]. The reason for this may be that the majority of respondents included in our study were from rural areas and had less access to health information. Nonetheless, about three quarters of our respondents had ever heard educational messages about mosquito nets, which is high compared with national survey results (41.0 %) [20]. This may be because our study included only households who were freely supplied with ITNs, which would contribute to increased exposure to educational messages. The difference might also be due to the presence of extensive promotion of ITNs currently underway in the country.

Presence of holes/tears on nets was also associated with malaria infection. Around 79 % of ITNs had holes/tears ≥ 2 cm, which is higher than a study done in Tanzania in which 45 % of ITNs had holes/tears ≥ 2 cm [21]. It is also higher than a survey conducted in Malawi, where 12.8 % of owners reported that nets had holes >2 cm [22]. The reasons for this may include structural issues in the house that pose challenges to hang nets, such that the nets are too short to fully cover sleeping areas, long duration in use of ITNs, and frequent washing on rough surfaces.

Our finding revealed that there was strong association between using ITNs and knowledge of malaria transmission by bite of mosquito, which is in line with a study done Ghana [23, 24]. Households with ITNs ever been washed shows significant increase of utilization compared to households with unwashed ITNs. This might be due to households having been encouraged to use clean ITNs as opposed to dirty ITNs.

About 20 % of ITNs were not used by households and 29 % of ITNs were used for other purposes such as storage of sorghum, to make fences, protect bulls from insect bites. This implies that distribution of nets to communities without health education on the importance of ITNs in prevention of malaria, as well as how to use nets, may not bring about the desired result. In this study education levels of respondents, and ever heard education messages about ITN were not associated with the use of ITNs. Age and sex of respondents were not significantly associated with ITN utilization in this study. Some studies reported similar findings [25, 26], while the others showed significant associations between these factors and ITN use [8, 27]. In addition, education levels and income did not significantly affect ITN use in our study which is in line with previous study done Ethiopia [8], Uganda [28] and Nigeria [29]. Given the cross-sectional nature of the results, interpretation of study results is limited. One of the major limitations of this study was that it relied on reported use of ITNs by households prior nights, without any means observation. Thus, the percentage of ITN use in this study might be overestimated due to self- reporting bias. In the future, research using a prospective cohort study design would be valuable.

Conclusions

This study in Southwest Ethiopia showed a high proportion of net ownership compared to a household survey from Ethiopia which included in the World Malaria Report. Despite somewhat high percentages ITN ownership, the study demonstrated there was still a gap between ownership and use of ITNs. On average, four individuals shared a single ITN and over one third of ITNs had at least one hole/tear. The two factors strongly associated with ITN use in surveyed households included knowledge of mosquito bites as a main mode of malaria transmission, and washing of ITNs at least once. To achieve sustained control of malaria, household coverage of nets alone is not sufficient. Public health interventions should also address problems related to utilization and care of ITNs. Intensive health education and community mobilization efforts should be employed to influence the specific factors identified as affecting ITN use.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

Our sincere thanks go to the Mettu University for providing financial support to this study. We are grateful to the Ilu Aba Bor Zonal Health Office and Chewaka district Health Office for their cooperation and for giving us all the invaluable information we requested. The authors are grateful to Victoria Ryan for proof reading of the manuscript. Finally, we offer our gratitude to the study participants, as well as the field supervisors, data collectors and all others who made this study possible.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Mettu University
(2)
Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Public Health and Medical Sciences, Mettu University

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease. Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nsungwa-Sabiiti J, Peterson S, Pariyo G, Ogwal-Okeng J, Petzold MG, Tomson G. Home-based management of fever and malaria treatment practices in Uganda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101:1199–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. National malaria guidelines. Third edition. Ministry of Health. Addis Ababa, 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Alemu A, Abebe G, Tsegaye W, Golassa L. Climatic variables and malaria transmission dynamics in Jimma town, South West Ethiopia. Malar. J. 2011; 4(30). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles
  5. WHO. Insecticide-Treated Mosquito Nets: a WHO Position Statement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Lengeler C. Insecticide-treated bed nets and curtains for preventing malaria, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004. 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Eisele TP, Larsen D, Steketee RW. Protective efficacy of interventions for preventing malaria mortality in children in plasmodium falciparum endemic areas. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:i88i101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Loha E, Tefera K, Lindtjørn B. Freely distributed bed-net use among Chano Mille residents, south Ethiopia: a longitudinal study. Malaria Journal. 2013;12:23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-12-23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Net Mark research 1999–2006. Available at: http://www.netmarkafrica.org/research. (Accessed on: 15/08/ 2006).
  10. Macintyre K, Keating J, Okbaldt YB. Rolling out insecticide treated nets in Eritrea: examining the determinants of possession and use in malarious zones during rainy seasons. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(6):824–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Koreromp EL, Miller J, Cibulskis RE, Kabir Cham M, Alnwick D, Dye C. Monitoring mosquito net coverage for malaria control in Africa: possession versus use by children under 5 years. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8(8):693–703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsuyuoko R, Midizi SM, Dziva P, Makunike B. The acceptability of insecticide treated mosquito nets among community members in Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 2002;48(7–8):87–91.Google Scholar
  13. Astatkie A, Feleke A. Utilization of insecticide treated nets in Arbaminch Town and the malarious villages of Arbaminch Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2009;23(3):206–15.Google Scholar
  14. Roll Back Malaria, MEASURE Evaluation, World Health Organization, and UNICEF. Guidelines For Core Population Coverage Indicators For Roll Back Malaria: To Be Obtained From Household Surveys, MEASURE Evaluation, Calverton, Md, USA, World Health Organization; 2006.Google Scholar
  15. WHO. World Malaria Report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. RBM. The African Summit on Roll Back Malaria, Abuja, Nigeria. WHO/CDS/RBM/200.17.RBM. Geneva: World Health Orginization; 2000, p. 556–6.Google Scholar
  17. World Health Assembly. Fifty-Eight World Health Assembly: Malaria Control. In vol Resolution 55/284. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005Google Scholar
  18. Dagne G, Deressa W. Knowledge and utilization of insecticide treated mosquito nets among freely supplied households in Wonago Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Geneva: Ethiop J Health Dev. 2008;22(1):34–41.Google Scholar
  19. Baume AC, Reithinger R, Woldehanna S. Factors associated with use and non-use of mosquito nets owned in Oromia and Amhara Regional States, Ethiopia. Malaria Journal. 2009;8:264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-8-264.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jima D, Tesfaye G, Deressa W, Woyessa A, Kebede D, Alamirew D. Baseline survey for the implementation of ITNs for malaria control in Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2005;19(1):16–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Erlanger T, Enayati A, Hemingway J, Mashinda H, Tami A, Lengeler C. Field issues related to effectiveness of insecticide treated nets in Tanzania. Med Vet Entomol. 2004;18(2):153–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Holtz TH, Marum LH, Mkandala C. ITN use, anemia, and malaria parasitemia in Blantyre district, Malawi. Trop Med Int Health. 2002;7(4):220–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Agyepong IA, Manderson L. Mosquito avoidance and bed net use in the Greater Accra Region, Ghana. J Biosoc Sci. 1999;31(1):79–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Binka FN, Adongo P. Acceptability and use of insecticide impregnated bednets in northern Ghana. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2(5):499–507.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Berie Y, Alemu K, Belay A, Gizaw Z. Factors affecting utilization of Insecticide treated nets among people living with HIV/AIDs in Bahir Dar city, northwest Ethiopia. J Clin Med. 2013;2(6):147–52.Google Scholar
  26. Atieli E, Guofa Zhou G, Afrane Y, Lee M, Mwanzo I, Githeko K, et al. Insecticide-treated net (ITN) ownership, usage, and malaria transmission in the highlands of western Kenya. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Aigbe W, Iwara O, Okongor E, Okino I. Ownership and utilization of Insecticide Treated nets in Cross River States, Nigeria. J Med Sci. 2012;12(7):198–206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sangare LR, Weiss NS, Brentlinger PE, Richardson BA, Staedke SG, Kiwuwa MS, et al. Determinants of use of insecticide treated nets for the prevention of malaria in pregnancy: Jinja, Uganda. PLoS ONE. 2012;7, e39712.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ye Y, Patton E, Kilian A, Dovey S, Eckert E. Can universal insecticide-treated net campaigns achieve equity in coverage and use? The case of northern Nigeria. Malar J. 2012;11:32.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Berkessa et al. 2016

Advertisement