Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Unemployment and ill health: a connection through inflammation?

  • Jukka Hintikka1Email author,
  • Soili M Lehto2,
  • Leo Niskanen3,
  • Anne Huotari4,
  • Karl-Heinz Herzig4,
  • Heli Koivumaa-Honkanen5,
  • Kirsi Honkalampi2,
  • Sanna Sinikallio6 and
  • Heimo Viinamäki1
BMC Public Health20099:410

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-410

Received: 10 June 2009

Accepted: 12 November 2009

Published: 12 November 2009

Abstract

Background

Unemployment is a source of acute and long-term psychosocial stress. Acute and chronic psychosocial stress can induce pronounced changes in human immune responses. In this study we tested our hypothesis that stress-induced low-grade tissue inflammation is more prevalent among the unemployed.

Methods

We determined the inflammatory status of 225 general population subjects below the general retirement age (65 years in Finland). Those who had levels of both interleukin-6 (≥ 0.97 pg/mL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (≥ 1.49 mg/L) above the median were assessed to have an elevated inflammatory status (n = 72).

Results

An elevated inflammatory status was more common among the unemployed than among other study participants (59% versus 30%, p = 0.011). In the final multivariate model, those who were unemployed had over five-fold greater odds for having an elevated inflammatory status (OR 5.20, 95% CI 1.55-17.43, p = 0.008).

Conclusion

This preliminary finding suggests that stress-induced low-grade inflammation might be a link between unemployment and ill health.

Background

In June 2009, approximately 45 million (8.3%) people living in the OECD countries were unemployed, and the figures were rapidly increasing due to the severe economic recession [1]. In some underdeveloped countries, estimated unemployment rates may be as high as 80 to 90% [2].

Ill health is common among the unemployed, and the causal relationship may be bidirectional. Poor health may lead to unemployment or be an obstacle to employment opportunities, while, vice versa, being unemployed may have an adverse effect on one's health [3, 4]. Several health problems such as stress symptoms, mental disorders, hypertension, and coronary heart disease are associated with unemployment [58]. However, unemployment periods may protect workers from musculoskeletal diseases [9]. Many socio-demographic factors such as sex, age, education, alcohol consumption, obesity, and other adverse life-styles modify the relationship between unemployment and health [7], and even unemployment and mortality [10].

During recent years, studies have suggested that acute and chronic psychosocial stress can induce pronounced changes in human immune responses and that these changes are predominantly mediated via neuroendocrine mediators [1113]. Furthermore, high levels of inflammation seem to associate with several somatic diseases, depression, and disease progression [1416]. These associations suggest that high levels of inflammation might be a mediator between unemployment and ill health. Nevertheless, we found only two previous studies suggesting that some aspects of immune function may be altered following the loss of work [17, 18].

Arnetz et al. found significant decreases in phytohemagglutinin reactivity of lymphocytes and in reactivity to a purified protein derivative of tuberculin in unemployed women after nine months [17]. Janicki-Deverts et al. reported that discrete episodes of unemployment may have long-term implications for future CRP level in young males [18].

High levels of proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) are indicators of inflammation. Yaffe et al. originally suggested, and Capuron et al. repeated the suggestion that medians of IL-6 and hs-CRP could be used together as indicators of low-grade tissue inflammation [14, 19]. In the current study using a sample of the Finnish general population we applied this suggestion to test our hypothesis - formulated on the basis of current evidence - that stress-induced low-grade tissue inflammation is more prevalent among the unemployed.

Methods

As a part of an ongoing follow-up study on a sample of the Finnish general population we determined the inflammatory status in 225 individuals below the general retirement age (65 years in Finland). There were 93 men and 132 women in the sample. The mean age was 52.6 (SD 8.2, range: 32 - 64) years in men and 52.0 (SD 7.6, range 32-64) years in women. The study period was from October 2004 to April 2006. Approval to conduct the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Kuopio University Hospital and the University of Kuopio. All procedures were carried out with the adequate understanding of the study participants, who gave written informed consent before entering the study.

The respondents completed a standardized questionnaire that screened sociodemographic variables (sex, age, marital status, length of education). They were also asked how often they had used alcohol over the past twelve months (classified as less/more than twice a week), whether they were current daily smokers and whether they had physical diseases diagnosed by a doctor. The participants were also asked whether there had been subjective economic hardship during the previous twelve months ("How is your current financial situation?" (good, fairly good = good financial situation, fairly poor, poor = economic hardship). The questionnaire also included the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory, which was used to indicate the level of depressive symptoms [20].

In addition, the employment status was inquired and those who reported being unemployed (n = 19, 8.4% of the study sample) were compared with the others in final analyses. The frequency of unemployment in the sample was at the same level as the total unemployment rate in Finland during the study period (7.7% in December 2004 and 7.6% in December 2005) [21]. Of the other study participants, 131 (63.6%) were at work, 14 (6.8%) on sick leave, 52 (25.2%) had retired, 3 (1.5%) were students and 6 (2.9%) were voluntarily not at work. Of all study participants, 25 (11.1%) had been unemployed in 1998, 31 (13.8%) in 1999 and 28 (12.4%) in 2001.

Height and body weight were measured in light clothing without shoes, and the body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) was estimated. The laboratory measurements were carried out in the medical laboratory of Kuopio University Hospital. The participants came for venous blood sampling at 8 am, after having been instructed to fast for the previous 12 hours.

The measurement of serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein was carried out according to a routine protocol using a kinetic immunoturbidimetric method (Beckman Coulter CRH High Sensitivity Protein Reagent, Beckman Coulter CAL 5 Plus) and analyzed using an IMMAGE Immunochemistry System (Beckman Coulter, USA).

For the cytokine analyses, the venous blood samples were stored at -80°C until run. The levels of IL-6 (pg/mL) were analyzed by multiplexing with Bio-Plex Human Cytokine Panel 1 utilizing a Bio-Plex instrument based on Luminex xMAP technology (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., CA, US). Before analyses, the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 3000 rpm, and diluted 1:2 in an appropriate sample matrix. The assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The intra- and interassay variations for the IL-6 analysis were 4.6-13.8% and 3.7-17.2%, respectively.

As originally suggested by Yaffe et al. and later by Capuron et al., we used a proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as indicators of low-grade inflammation [14, 19]. In this study, levels above the median for both IL-6 (≥ 0.97 pg/mL) and hs-CRP (≥ 1.49 mg/L) indicated an elevated inflammatory status (n = 72).

In univariate analyses we used the χ2 test for categorical variables, Student's t-test for normally distributed continuous variables and Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables with a skewed distribution. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between IL-6, hs-CRP, age, length of education, BDI and BMI. Linear regression models were tested separately for IL-6 and hs-CRP. Inflammatory markers were log-transformed for these analyses. Finally, several forced multivariate logistic regression models were calculated to test whether there were independent associations between being or having been unemployed, and having a high inflammatory status. The models were adjusted for sex, age, marital status, economic hardship, education, smoking, alcohol consumption, some common somatic diseases, the Beck Depression Inventory score, and the body mass index.

Results

Basic characteristics of the sample are presented in Table 1. The only statistically significant difference between the unemployed and other study participants was in the frequency of economic hardship (p = 0.012).
Table 1

Basic characteristics of the sample

 

The unemployed

(n = 19)

Other study participants

(n = 206)

Men (%)

42

41

Age (years; mean (SD))

49.2 (9.1)

52.6 (7.7)

Marital status: single (%)

21

17

Economic hardship (%) *

42

18

Daily smoking (%)

26

23

Alcohol use 2×/week or more (%)

26

17

Education (years; mean (SD))

11.5 (2.7)

12.3 (3.5)

Hypertension (%)

32

30

Coronary heart disease (%)

4

11

Musculoskeletal symptoms (%)

11

20

BDI total score (mean (SD))

10.0 (8.5)

8.1 (8.4)

BMI (kg/m2; mean (SD))

28.0 (5.8)

27.2 (5.4)

IL-6 (pg/mL; mean (SD))

27.51 (101.32)

3.21 (9.53)

hs-CRP (mg/L; mean (SD))

3.56 (4.21)

2.74 (3.85)

SD = standard deviation, BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; BMI = body mass index. IL-6 = interleukin-6. hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

* χ2 = 6.34, df = 1, p = 0.012.

There was a trend that the unemployed had higher IL-6 levels than other study participants (p = 0.067). No other differences were found in levels of IL-6 or hs-CRP in relation to gender, economic situation, smoking, alcohol use and somatic diseases (data not shown).

Il-6 and hs-CRP correlated significantly with each other (r = 0.271, p < 0.01). Moreover, IL-6 correlated positively with BMI (r = 0.154, p < 0.05) and negatively with length of education (r = -0.173, p < 0.01), and hs-CRP correlated positively with BMI (r = 0.439, p < 0.01) and the BDI score (r = 0.131, p < 0.05). No other statistically significant correlations were found between hs-CRP or IL-6 and age, BMI, BDI score or length of education.

Unemployment associated independently with IL-6 levels in a sex- and age-adjusted linear regression model (β = 0.145, p = 0.03). The association remained statistically significant when the model was separately adjusted for sex, age, marital status, economic hardship, smoking, alcohol use, education, somatic diseases, BDI total score and BMI (p = 0.22 - 0.46). However, after full adjustment there was only a trend for an independent association between unemployment and IL-6 (p = 0.075). Respective associations between unemployment and hs-CRP were not statistically significant.

An elevated inflammatory status (both IL-6 and hs-CRP above the median) was more common among unemployed study participants than the others (11/19, 58% versus 61/206, 30%, χ2 = 6.40, df = 1, p = 0.01). Moreover, those who had an elevated inflammatory status had fewer years of education (11.5 (SD 3.6) versus 12.5 (SD 3.3) years, t = 1.96, df = 220, p = 0.05) and a higher body mass index (29.4 (SD 6.9) versus 26.3 (SD 4.2), Mann-Whitney U = 4041.00, Z = -2.96, p = 0.003) than the others.

In the final logistic regression model, which was adjusted for sex, age, marital status, economic hardship, smoking, alcohol use, education, somatic diseases, BDI total score and BMI, those who were unemployed had significantly increased odds for having an elevated inflammatory status (odds ratio (OR) 5.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.55-17.43, p = 0.008) (Table 2). A higher body mass index was the only other variable which also associated statistically significantly (p < 0.001) with inflammatory status.
Table 2

Odds for having an elevated inflammatory status

 

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Sex (men/women)

0.70 (0.40-1.24)

0.69 (0.37-1.32)

Age (years)

1.02 (0.98-1.06)

1.04 (0.99-1.09)

Marital status (other/single)

0.81 (0.38-1.06)

0.70 (0.29-1.72)

Economic hardship (no/yes)

0.95 (0.47-1.92)

0.57 (0.21-1.51)

Daily smoking (no/yes)

1.73 (0.92-3.28)

2.12 (0.99-4.57)

Alcohol use (less/more than 2×/week)

1.08 (0.52-2.24)

0.90 (0.40-2.06)

Education (years)

0.92 (0.84-1.00)

0.99 (0.89-1.10)

Hypertension (no/yes)

1.64 (0.90-2.98)

1.29 (0.62-2.69)

Coronary heart disease (no/yes)

0.20 (0.03-1.60)

0.15 (0.02-1.33)

Musculoskeletal symptoms (no/yes)

0.87 (0.42-1.78)

0.91 (0.38-2.16)

BDI total score

1.01 (0.98-1.05)

1.00 (0.96-1.05)

BMI (kg/m2)

1.12 (1.06-1.18)

1.13 (1.06-1.20)

Unemployed (no/yes)

2.84 (1.10-7.33)

5.20 (1.55-17.43)

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory; BMI = body mass index.

We also tested whether being unemployed in 1998, 1999 or 2001 was associated with the inflammatory status in 2005. Unemployment in none of these years reached statistical significance when added to the model presented in Table 2. The unemployed had the following adjusted odds for an elevated inflammatory status: OR 2.67 (95% CI 0.87-8.18), p = 0.086 in 1998, OR 1.52 (95% CI 0.57-4.07), p = 0.40 in 1998 and OR 0.79 (95% CI 0.27 - 2.30), p = 0.67 in 2001. The association between being unemployed and having an elevated inflammatory status in 2005 remained statistically significant after adjustments for unemployment in 1998, 1999 and 2001. The odds were 4.12 (95% CI 1.17-14.58), p = 0.028 in 1998, 3.94 (95% 1.13-13.77), p = 0.032 in 1999 and 5.33 (95% CI 1.45-19.62), p = 0.012 in 2001.

Because very high levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP may indicate acute infection, we also tested a fully adjusted model where participants who had very high (mean + 3 SD) levels of IL-6 (> 97.70 pg/mL) and hs-CRP (> 14.45 mg/L) had been excluded. The independent association between unemployment and low-grade tissue inflammation remained essentially the same as in our final model using the whole study population (OR 4.91, 95% CI 1.42 - 16.98).

Discussion

Unemployment and an elevated inflammatory status indeed appeared to be associated, as we hypothesized. The association remained significant even after adjustments for several possible confounders.

Although preliminary and certainly in a need of replication, these findings suggest that unemployment is among those psychosocial stressors that may affect the human immune system. Furthermore, since disturbances in the immune system are associated with an increased risk of several illnesses, stress-induced low-grade inflammation might be among the links between unemployment and ill health.

Being unemployed seven, six or four years earlier did not associate with an elevated inflammatory status in 2005 when adjusted for unemployment in 2005. This contradicts the findings from previous studies in which periods of unemployment have associated with disturbed immune function even some years later [17, 18]. However, different measures of immune function may give different findings concerning its association with unemployment.

Previously, Janicki-Deverts et al. have reported that discrete episodes of unemployment and higher CRP levels are associated [18]. We did not find such an association. Instead, levels of IL-6 seemed to associate with unemployment even after several adjustments. However, an inflammatory marker that was based on above median levels of both IL-6 and hs-CRP was the best indicator of a connection between unemployment and low-grade tissue inflammation. The same method has been used to indicate that inflammation is one determinant of depressive symptoms in individuals with metabolic syndrome and that metabolic syndrome contributes to cognitive impairment in elderly people with a high level of inflammation [14, 19].

Based on the evidence, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) have recommended cut-offs of 1.0 and 3.0 mg/L for hs-CRP to be used for categorization into a low, intermediate, and high risk of cardiovascular diseases [22]. The median (1.49 mg/L) used as a cut-off level in this study indicates intermediate risk. IL-6 does not have any established cut-off level for clinically significant inflammation. Thus, although the same methodology has been used as a measure of inflammation in several studies, its clinical significance has not yet been fully established.

The small sample size is a major shortcoming of this study. Another limitation is that we did not know how long the study participants had been unemployed. It is not, however, self-evident that negative consequences on health are more probable if one has been unemployed for a long time [4]. Moreover, our cross-sectional study design does not allow us to exclude the possibility that study participants had had an elevated inflammatory status prior to unemployment. However, the final multivariate model, which suggested an independent association between unemployment and inflammation, was adjusted for several confounding variables, which decreases the risk of misinterpretation. Finally, dichotomization of continuous variables may have increased the risk of spurious findings in multivariate models [23].

We used the Luminex method in cytokine analyses. Luminex measurements of unstimulated plasma IL-6 levels may be different from those obtained with traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA), the gold standard of current peptide immunoassays. This may make comparisons between studies difficult. However, the correlation between the Luminex method and other multiplex assays has been shown to be sufficient, and the correlations between multiplex analyses and traditional ELISA techniques have also been demonstrated to be high in several papers [2428]. In our study, regardless of the observed overall levels of IL-6 and hs-CRP, an elevated inflammatory status associated independently with unemployment. Finally, a limitation of the current study is that the samples were not assayed in a duplicate. However, the measurement principle of the Luminex assay method could overrule this limitation, at least partially, as the values obtained for the measured analyte were average values based on 100 bead measurements.

Conclusion

We found that unemployment is associated with low-grade tissue inflammation, which may be a stress-induced link between unemployment and ill health. The finding, however, is preliminary and needs replication to be confirmed. Further studies are therefore warranted.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by funding from the Annual EVO Financing. The researchers were independent from the funder.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Kuopio
(2)
Department of Psychiatry, Kuopio University Hospital
(3)
Department of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Kuopio
(4)
Institute of Biomedicine, Division of Physiology and Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu
(5)
Department of Psychiatry, University of Oulu and Lapland Hospital District
(6)
Department of Rehabilitation, Kuopio University Hospital

References

  1. OECD: StatExtracts. [http://stats.oecd.org/WBOS/Index.aspx?QueryName=251&QueryType=View]
  2. CIA - The World Factbook. [https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2129rank.html]
  3. Bartley M: Unemployment and ill health: understanding the relationship. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994, 48: 333-337. 10.1136/jech.48.4.333.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Böckerman P, Ilmakunnas P: Unemployment and self-assessed health: evidence from panel data. Health Economics. 2009, 18: 161-179. 10.1002/hec.1361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook DG, Cummins RO, Bartley MJ, Shaper AG: Health of unemployed middle-aged men in Great Britain. Lancet. 1982, 319 (8284): 1290-1294. 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)92852-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hammarström A: Health consequences of youth unemployment. Public Health. 1994, 108: 403-412. 10.1016/S0033-3506(94)80097-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Leino-Arjas P, Liira J, Mutanen P, Malmivaara A, Matikainen E: Predictors and consequences of unemployment among construction workers: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 1999, 319: 600-605.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Breslin FC, Mustard C: Factors influencing the impact of unemployment on mental health among young and older adults in a longitudinal, population-based survey. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003, 29: 5-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Heponiemi T, Elovainio M, Manderbacka K, Aalto A-M, Kivimäki M, Keskimäki I: Relationship between unemployment and health among health care professionals: health selection or health effect?. J Psychosom Res. 2007, 63: 425-431. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lundin A, Lundberg I, Hallsten L, Ottosson J, Hemingsson T: Unemployment and mortality - a longitudinal prospective study on selection and causation in 49 321 Swedish middle aged men. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009Google Scholar
  11. Kemeny ME, Schedlowski M: Understanding the interaction between psychosocial stress and immune-related diseases: a stepwise progression. Brain Behav Immunity. 2007, 21: 1009-1018. 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.07.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Sorrells SF, Sapolsky RM: An inflammatory review of glucocorticoid actions in the CNS. Brain, Behav Immunity. 2007, 21: 259-272. 10.1016/j.bbi.2006.11.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Leonard BE, Myint A: The psychoneuroimmunology of depression. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2009, 24: 165-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Capuron L, Su S, Miller AH, Bremner JD, Goldberg J, Vogt GJ, et al: Depressive symptoms and metabolic syndrome: is inflammation the underlying link?. Biol Psychiatry. 2008, 64: 896-900. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.019.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Picciotto S, Forastiere F, Pistelli R, Koenig W, Lanki T, Ljungman P, et al: Determinants of plasma interleukin-6 levels among survivors of myocardial infarction. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008, 15: 631-638. 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283069d9a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller AH, Maletic V, Raison CL: Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2009, 65: 732-741. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.11.029.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Arnetz BB, Wasserman J, Petrini B, Brenner S-O, Levi L, Eneroth P, et al: Immune function in unemployed women. Psychosom Med. 1987, 49: 3-12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Janicki-Deverts D, Cohen S, Matthews KA, Cullen MR: History of unemployment predicts future elevations in C-reactive protein among male participants in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Ann Behav Med. 2008, 36: 176-185. 10.1007/s12160-008-9056-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Yaffe K, Kanaya A, Lindquist K, Simonsick EM, Harris T, Shorr RI, et al: The metabolic syndrome, inflammation, and risk of cognitive decline. JAMA. 2004, 292: 2237-2242. 10.1001/jama.292.18.2237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J: An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961, 4: 561-571.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Statistics Finland. [http://www.stat.fi/ajk/tiedotteet/v2006/tiedote_006_2006-01-24_en.html]
  22. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, Criqui M, Fadl YY, Fortmann SP, Hong Y, Myers GL, Rifai N, Smith SC, Taubert K, Tracy RP, Vinicor F: Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003, 107: 499-511. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000052939.59093.45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Babyak MA: What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004, 66: 411-421. 10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Khan SS, Smith MS, Reda D, Suffredini AF, McCoy JP: Multiplex bead array assays for detection of soluble cytokines: comparisons of sensitivity and quantitative values among kits from multiple manufacturers. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2004, 61: 35-39. 10.1002/cyto.b.20021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan IH, Krishnan VV, Ziman M, Janatpour K, Wun T, Luciw PA, Tuscano J: A comparison of multiplex suspension array large-panel kits for profiling cytokines and chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2009, 76: 159-168.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. de Jager W, te Velthuis H, Prakken BJ, Kuis W, Rijkers GT: Simultaneous detection of 15 human cytokines in a single sample of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003, 10: 133-139.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Elshal MF, McCoy JP: Multiplex bead array assays: performance evaluation and comparison of sensitivity to ELISA. Methods. 2006, 38: 317-323. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Leng SX, McElhaney JE, Walston JD, Xie D, Fedarko NS, Kuchel GA: ELISA and multiplex technologies for cytokine measurement in inflammation and aging research. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008, 63: 879-884.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/410/prepub

Copyright

© Hintikka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement