Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Public Health

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Characteristics of HIV seroprevalence of visitors to public health centers under the national HIV surveillance system in Korea: cross sectional study

  • Mee-Kyung Kee1,
  • Jin-Hee Lee1,
  • Chaeshin Chu2,
  • Eun-Ju Lee1 and
  • Sung-Soon Kim1Email author
BMC Public Health20099:123

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-123

Received: 06 August 2008

Accepted: 05 May 2009

Published: 05 May 2009

Abstract

Background

In Korea, the cumulative number of HIV-infected individuals was smaller than those of other countries. Mandatory HIV tests, dominating method until 1990's, have been gradually changed to voluntary HIV tests. We investigated HIV seroprevalence status and its characteristics of visitors to Public Health Centers (PHCs), which conducted both mandatory test and voluntary test under the national HIV/STI surveillance program.

Methods

We used HIV-testing data from 246 PHCs in 2005 through the Health Care Information System. The number of test taker was calculated using the code distinguished by the residential identification number. The subjects were classified into four groups by reason for testing; General group, HIV infection suspected group (HIV ISG), HIV test recommended group (HIV TRG), and sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk group.

Results

People living with HIV/AIDS were 149 (124 male and 25 female) among 280,456 individuals tested at PHCs. HIV seroprevalence was 5.3 per 10,000 individuals. Overall, the male revealed significantly higher seroprevalence than the female (adjusted Odds Ratio (adj. OR): 6.2; CI 3.8–10.2). Individuals aged 30–39 years (adj. OR: 2.6; CI 1.7–4.0), and 40–49 years (adj. OR: 3.8; CI 2.4–6.0) had higher seroprevalence than 20–29 years. Seroprevalence of HIV ISG (voluntary test takers and cases referred by doctors) was significantly higher than those of others. Foreigners showed higher seroprevalence than native Koreans (adj. OR: 3.8; CI 2.2–6.4). HIV ISG (adj. OR: 4.9; CI 3.2–7.5), and HIV TRG (adj. OR: 2.6; CI 1.3–5.4) had higher seroprevalence than General group.

Conclusion

A question on the efficiency of current mandatory test is raised because the seroprevalence of mandatory test takers was low. However, HIV ISG included voluntary test takers was high in our result. Therefore, we suggest that Korea needs to develop a method encouraging more people to take voluntary tests at PHCs, also to expand the anonymous testing centers and Voluntary Counselling and Testing Program (VCT) for general population to easily access to HIV testing.

Background

The first case of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in Korea was a foreign resident, and the first human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected Korean contracted the virus during overseas travel in 1985 [1]. This stimulated a national preventative system for this emerging infection in Korea, which became prevalent in the United States and Europe in the early 1980s [2, 3]. In 1985, mandatory HIV tests were established in commercial sex workers (CSWs) with sexual contact with foreigners [1, 4], and in 1986 mandatory test was expanded to CSWs with sexual contact with Koreans and hemophiliacs. Prison inmates and donated blood samples were included in the mandatory testing group in July 1987 [5]. HIV mandatory testing was extended to seafarers with long-term overseas contracts in 1988 [6], and voluntary anonymous HIV testing was allowed to ensure broader screening in 1989. Article 8 of the Prevention Act for Acquired Immunological Deficiency Syndrome (1986) established the national surveillance system for the detection of HIV-positive individuals. Public health centers (PHCs) were instructed to conduct HIV screening tests for sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk groups periodically, and for volunteer groups arbitrarily [7]. The number of mandatory HIV tests in Korea reached approximately 2 million until 1997, with the addition of hair salon employees, restaurant employees, and food industry employees, food industry sanitation workers and public health personnel. However, in 1998 the Korean government amended the HIV testing policy from mandatory testing to voluntary testing by the Act of Health Check for Food Industry Employees and Others. This exempted restaurant, food industry employees and others from mandatory HIV testing [8].

UNAIDS estimated 40.3 million people living worldwide with HIV/AIDS in 2005, and AIDS-associated deaths were up to 20 million [9]. HIV/AIDS has been expanding rapidly in India, China, and Southeast Asia. China has increased recently with an estimated 650,000 infected individuals [10]. The seroprevalence in Russia increased more than five times from 1997 to 2002 [11]. Frequent visits between Korea and these countries might have increased the risk of individuals spreading HIV/AIDS in Korea [12]. The percentage of HIV infections in Korean adults aged 19–45 years as estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2003 was relatively low at 0.01% [13]. A total of 4,341 HIV infections were identified in Korea from 1985 to 2005, including 88% Korean and 12% foreigners. The proportion of HIV infections in the male (89%) was much higher than that in the female (11%) [14]. The number of newly diagnosed HIV infections has increased yearly in Korea since 1998: 137 in 1998, 244 in 2000, 457 in 2002, and 763 in 2004 [14]. The Korean government conducted various projects to slow down the increasing HIV infection; HIV diagnosis and financial support of treatment were offered for people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) [14]. There are no epidemiological studies to estimate or project the rate of HIV transmission and to evaluate HIV/AIDS prevention projects in Korea, even any investigation about essential HIV seroprevalence. As the one of HIV testing centers in Korea, PHCs are responsible to implement HIV/STI prevention for the susceptible, low-income individual, and the anonymous, through taking both HIV mandatory testing and voluntary testing under national HIV surveillance system. In 2005, PHCs conducted about 6% of HIV tests in Korea, and detected approximately 19% of newly diagnosed HIV infections [15]. It was urgent to identify the status of HIV seroprevalence among visitors to PHCs whose HIV positivity was higher than other HIV test centers. Therefore, we investigated HIV seroprevalence status and its characteristics of visitors to PHCs.

Methods

Data Collection

PHCs in Korea have adopted a nationally incorporated computerized data processing system, known as the health care information system (HCIS), since 2000. The system handles various health-related test results along with other demographic and laboratory information. A total of 372,692 HIV tests were carried out at 246 PHCs in 2005. The following data from the HCIS were collected from each center: institutional identification, reception number, reception date, gender, date of birth, residence areas, test method, test kit, test result, reason for testing, and code. The code is a parameter to identify the testing frequency of each individual, and it is linked to each residential identification number (RID, 13 digit numbers), unique number for each Korean, which is coded by the date of birth, gender, birth place and check number. The RID were declared during initial testing and in subsequent tests the unique code was internally assigned inside HCIS. The RID cannot be deduced from the code and it ensures an individual's confidentiality.

Public HIV testing system under the National HIV surveillance

In Korea, HIV reactive samples from primary screening tests at PHCs are referred to local Institute of Health & Environment (IHE) for confirmatory testing. There are 17 local IHEs in 7 cities and in 10 provinces. Confirmed positive samples are referred to the division of AIDS at the Korean Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (KCDC), and the division makes final decision on HIV infection status for each sample [7].

Subjects

All individuals in this study took free of charge HIV testing for personal physical examinations in community health improvement programs by PHCs. There were 14 reasons for HIV testing by the HCIS, and these were classified into four groups: The General group, the HIV infection suspected group (HIV ISG), the HIV test recommended group (HIV TRG), and the STI risk group. We grouped the STI risk group and the HIV TRG according to the "Guidelines for HIV/AIDS control" [7]. Individuals in the General group took HIV test as a part of health checkup, and the HIV ISG took HIV test based on suspicion of HIV infection (Table 1). As anonymous tests could not determine the number of individuals, it was not included in the seroprevalence estimates. We calculated the positivity for the anonymous testing group.
Table 1

Classification of the reason for HIV testing of visitors to public health centers in Korea (2005).

Class

Reason for HIV testing

Regulation

General group

- Health checkup: a comprehensive physical examination

- Medical certificate: to apply for workplace permits, residence halls, licenses, officers, workers, welfare centers, detention centers and in shelters for women.

- Prenatal checkup

- Others: Employees of motels, restaurants, and beauty salons, etc.

Voluntary testing

(but medical certificate for a job or residence appeared to be by routine testing.).

HIV infection s

uspected group

(HIV ISG)

- Referral by doctor: to take additional HIV tests when doctors suspect HIV infection at diagnosis

- Voluntary test taker: to take HIV test as identified if suspicious.

Voluntary testing (because doctors or themselves are suspicious about HIV infection).

HIV test recommended group (HIV TRG)

- Tuberculosis patient

- Prisoner

- Partner of HIV-infected individual

Though routine test regulated by "Guideline for HIV/AIDS control.

Sexually transmitted infection risk group (STI risk group)

- Commercial sex worker(CSW)

- Bar employee

- Tea-room employee

- Massage parlor

- Others: one of the above four categories, but not specified

Mandatory testing except male, regular mandatory HIV tests are taken every six months by "Guideline for HIV/AIDS control" to prevent the spread of HIV to general population.

Data Analysis

HIV seroprevalence was defined as the number of confirmed PLWHA divided by total number of HIV-tested individuals during the study period. Initially indeterminate samples that were positive on follow-up were included as HIV positive samples, and the first test date was defined as the date of diagnosis.

Tests without full RID or with incorrect RID (19,252 tests), and anonymous cases (9,877 tests) were excluded from the initial 372,692 tests. The testing frequency of each individual in a single year was referred to as the repeated number. The mean of the repeated number was calculated in each group and by gender. HIV seroprevalence was expressed as the number of PLWHA per 10,000 individuals. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine factors that were independently associated with HIV seroprevalence. The multi-variable models were fit adjusting for variables (gender, age group, nationality, region, and reason for testing). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was defined at the 95% confidence interval. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.1.

Results

A total of 280,456 individuals were tested at 246 PHCs in 2005, and 149 PLWHA were identified. The repeated number was significantly greater in the STI risk groups than in other groups (p < 0.0001), and there were statistically significant differences in the repeated number between the male and the female in the HIV ISG and the STI risk groups, but not for the General group and the HIV TRG (Figure 1).
Figure 1

The number of HIV test by gender and the group of reason for HIV testing (2005). HIV TRG: HIV test recommend group. HIV ISG: HIV infection suspected group. STI: sexually transmitted infection. Gender; male p<.0001, female p<.0001 Reason for HIV testing; General group P=0.1905, HIV TRG P=0.8971, HIV ISG P=0.0046, STI risk group P<0.0001

Table 2 presents demographic data about HIV seroprevalence in Korea. The female accounted for 68.7% of all tested individuals (n = 280,456), and twenties were the leading group (45.4%) while metropolitan city dweller took 40.4%. The STI risk group was outstanding (51.6%) in reason for testing. Overall HIV seroprevalence was 5.3 per 10,000 individuals and the male showed significantly higher seroprevalence than the female (adjusted Odds Ratio (adj, OR), 6.2; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 3.8–10.2). HIV seroprevalence in the aged 30–39 years (adj. OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.7–4.0), and the aged 40–49 years (adj. OR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.4–6.0) was higher than that in the aged 20–29 years as a reference. HIV seroprevalence in 9,959 foreigners was 18.1 cases per 10,000 individuals, and this was significantly higher than the seroprevalence among native Koreans (adj. OR, 3.8, 95% CI, 2.2–6.4). Small towns or rural areas revealed lower HIV seroprevalence than the metropolitan cities (adj. OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4–0.7). The HIV ISG (adj. OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 3.2–7.5) and the HIV TRG (adj. OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3–5.4) had higher seroprevalence than the General group. The lowest seroprevalence was seen in the STI risk group (1.5 per 10,000 individuals), but this was not significantly different from the General group (adj. OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.6–2.0) after adjusted by gender, age, nationality, and region.
Table 2

HIV seroprevalence of visitors to public health centers in Korea (2005).

 

No. of HIV tested

No. of HIV tested individuals (%)

No. positive

(%)

HIV Seroprevalence (95% CI)

Unadjusted OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Total

343563

280456

149

5.3 (4.5,6.5)

  

Gender

      

   Female

251483

192687 (68.7)

25 (16.8)

1.3 (0.8,1.8)

1.0

1.0

   Male

92080

87769 (31.3)

124 (83.2)

14.1 (11.6,16.6)

10.9 (7.1,16.8)

6.2 (3.8,10.2)

Age group

      

   <20

17922

15587 (5.6)

4 (2.7)

2.6 (0.1,5.1)

0.9 (0.3,2.6)

0.6 (0.2,1.6)

   20–29

165803

127393 (45.4)

35 (23.5)

2.7 (1.8,3.7)

1.0

1.0

   30–39

86052

70723 (25.2)

56 (37.5)

7.9 (5.8,10.0)

2.9 (1.9,4.4)

2.6 (1.7,4.0)

   40–49

43220

37559 (13.5)

41 (27.5)

10.9 (7.6,14.3)

4.0 (2.5,6.2)

3.8 (2.4,6.0)

   50–59

16039

15196 (5.4)

8 (5.4)

5.3 (1.6,8.9)

1.9 (0.9,4.1)

1.4 (0.6,3.0)

   60≤

14527

13998 (4.9)

5 (3.4)

3.6 (0.4,6.7)

1.3 (0.5,3.3)

0.9 (0.4,2.3)

Nationality

      

   Korean

333367

270497 (96.5)

131 (87.9)

4.8 (4.0,5.7)

1.0

1.0

   Foreigner

10196

9959 (3.5)

18 (12.1)

18.1 (9.7,26.4)

3.7 (2.3,6.1)

3.8 (2.2,6.4)

Region

      

   Metropolitan

134613

113290 (40.4)

87 (58.4)

7.7 (6.1,9.3)

1.0

1.0

   Small town or rural

208950

167166 (59.6)

62 (41.6)

3.7 (2.8,4.6)

0.5 (0.3,0.7)

0.5 (0.4,0.7)

Reason for testing

      

   General group

90628

88116 (31.4)

32 (21.5)

3.6 (2.4,4.9)

1.0

1.0

   HIV ISG

43517

39502 (14.1)

86 (57.7)

21.8 (17.2,26.4)

6.0 (4.0,9.0)

4.9 (3.2,7.5)

   HIV TRG

8351

8144 (2.9)

10 (6.7)

12.3 (4.7,19.9)

3.4 (1.7,6.9)

2.6 (1.3,5.4)

   STI risk group

201067

144694 (51.6)

21 (14.1)

1.5 (0.8,2.1)

0.4 (0.2,0.7)

1.1 (0.6,2.0)

HIV seroprevalence: the number of people living with HIV/AIDS per 10,000 individuals. All data are excluded 9,877 anonymous cases and 19,252 cases without full residential identification number (RID) or with incorrect RID. CI: Confidence Interval, OR: Odds Ratio. No. positive: the number of people living with HIV/AIDS.

HIV TRG: HIV test recommended group. HIV ISG: HIV infection suspected group. STI: sexually transmitted infection.

Table 3 presents the characteristics of HIV seroprevalence by reason for testing. Only in the HIV TRG, the male did not show significant difference from the female. Foreigners showed significantly higher seroprevalence in the General group (21.0 per 10,000 individuals) than in the STI risk group (14.1 per 10,000 individuals). There were no HIV positive foreigners identified in the HIV ISG and in the HIV TRG. Both groups displayed significantly higher seroprevalence than other groups in metropolitan cities (p < 0.05). For the HIV ISG, the seroprevalence was very high in the male (30.2 per 10,000 individuals), also the aged 30–39 years (37.9 per 10,000 individuals) and the aged 40–49 years (38.8 per 10,000 individuals) were very high.
Table 3

Comparison in HIV seroprevalences of visitors to public health centers by reason for HIV testing in Korea (2005).

 

General group

HIV ISG

HIV TRG

STI risk group

 

Individuals (%)

HIV+

SP(95%CI)

Individuals (%)

HIV+

SP(95%CI)

Individuals (%)

HIV+

SP(95%CI)

Individuals

(%)

HIV+

SP(95%CI)

Total

88116

32

3.6 (2.4–4.9)

39502

86

21.8 (17.2–26.4)

8144

10

12.3 (4.7–19.9)

144694

21

1.5 (0.8–2.1)

Gender

            

   Female

48628 (55.2)

8

1.6 (0.5–2.8)

13055 (33.0)

6

4.6 (0.9–8.3)

2359 (29.1)

3

12.7 (0.0–27.1)

128645 (88.9)

8

0.6 (0.2–1.1)

   Male

39488 (44.8)

24

6.1 (3.6–8.5)

26447 (67.0)

80

30.2 (23.6–36.9)

5785 (70.9)

7

12.1 (3.1–21.1)

16049 (11.1)

13

8.1 (3.7–12.5)

Age group

            

   <20

6518 (7.4)

0

0.0

3230 (8.2)

3

9.3 (0.0–19.8)

951 (11.7)

0

0.0

4888 (3.4)

1

2.0 (0.0–6.1)

   20–29

34290 (38.9)

12

3.5 (1.5–5.5)

14 673 (37.1)

15

10.2 (5.1–15.4)

1990 (24.4)

1

5.0 (0.0–14.9)

76440 (52.8)

7

0.9 (0.2–1.6)

   30–39

22165 (25.2)

10

4.5 ((1.7–7.3)

10302 (26.1)

39

37.9 (26.0–49.7)

1492 (18.3)

1

6.7 (0.0–19.8)

36764 (25.4)

6

1.6 (0.3–2.9)

   40–49

9275 (10.5)

9

9.7 (3.4–16.0)

5663 (14.3)

22

38.8 (22.6–55.1)

1380 (17.0)

6

43.5 (8.8–78.2)

21241 (14.7)

4

1.9 (0.0–3.7)

   50–59

7352 (8.3)

0

0.0

2872 (7.3)

4

13.9 (0.3–27.6)

832 (10.2)

1

12.0 (0.0–35.6)

4140 (2.9)

3

7.2 (0.0–15.4)

   60 ≤

8516 (9.7)

1

1.2 (0.0–3.5)

2762 (7.0)

3

10.9 (0.0–23.1)

1499 (18.4)

1

6.7 (0.0–19.7)

1221 (0.8)

0

0.0

Nationality

            

   Korean

80508 (91.4)

16

2.0 (1.0–3.0)

38710 (98.0)

86

22.2 (17.5–26.9)

8002 (98.3)

10

12.5 (4.8–20.2)

143277 (99.0)

19

1.3 (0.7–1.9)

   Foreigner

7608 (8.6)

16

21.0(10.7–31.3)

792 (2.0)

0

0.0

142 (1.7)

0

0.0

1417 (1.0)

2

14.1 (0.0–33.7)

Region

            

   Metropolitan

42563 (48.3)

18

4.2 (2.3–6.2)

17691 (44.8)

53

30.0 (21.9–38.0)

3956 (48.6)

7

17.7 (4.6–30.8)

49080 (33.9)

9

1.8 (0.6–3.6)

   Small town or rural

45553 (51.7)

14

3.1 (1.5–4.7)

21811 (55.2)

33

15.1 (10.0–20.3)

4188 (51.4)

3

7.2 (0.0–15.3)

95614 (66.1)

12

1.3 (0.5–2.0)

HIV TRG: HIV test recommend group. HIV ISG: HIV infection suspected group. STI: sexually transmitted infection

Individuals: the number of HIV tested individuals, HIV+: the number of people living with HIV/ADIS, SP (HIV seroprevalence): the number of people living with HIV/AIDS per 10,000 individuals.

CI: Confidence Interval

Among fourteen subgroups, the major parts taking tests were occupied by bar employees (31.2%) followed by the visitors requiring medical certificates (14.7%). Partners of HIV-infected individuals had the highest seroprevalence, followed sequentially by voluntary test takers (23.8 per 10,000 individuals), individuals referred by doctors (19.6 per 10,000 individuals), and prisoners (15.4 per 10,000 individuals). While there were no noticeable differences in the General group or the STI risk group after adjusted by gender, age, nationality, and region, individuals referred by doctors (adj. OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.7–7.5) and voluntary test takers (adj. OR, 5.7; 95% CI 2.8–11.8) had higher HIV seroprevalence than individuals for health checkup as a reference (Table 4).
Table 4

HIV seroprevalence of visitors to public health centers by reason for HIV testing in Korea (2005).

Group

Subgroup

No. of HIV tested individuals

(%)

No. of positive

HIV Seroprevalence

(95% CI)

Unadjusted OR

(95% CI)

Adjusted OR

(95% CI)

Total

 

280456

149

5.3 (4.5–6.5)

-

-

General group

Health Checkup

21598 (7.7)

9

4.2 (1.4–6.9)

1.0

1.0

 

Medical Certificate

41358 (14.7)

19

4.6 (2.5–6.7)

1.1 (0.5–2.4)

1.0 (0.4–2.3)

 

Prenatal Checkup

17159 (6.1)

2

1.2 (0.0–2.8)

0.3 (0.1–1.3)

1.2 (0.2–5.9)

 

Others*

8001 (2.9)

2

2.5 (0.0–6.0)

0.6 (0.1–1.0)

0.8 (0.1–1.4)

HIV ISG

Referral by doctor

19359 (6.9)

38

19.6 (13.4–25.9)

4.7 (2.3–9.8)

3.6 (1.7–7.5)

 

Voluntary test taker

20143 (7.2)

48

23.8 (17.1–30.6)

5.7 (2.8–11.7)

5.7 (2.8–11.8)

HIV TRG

TB patient

6822 (2.4)

3

4.4 (0.0–9.4)

1.1 (0.3–3.9)

0.9 (0.2–3.4)

 

Prisoner

1295 (0.5)

2

15.4 (0.0–36.8)

3.7 (0.8–17.2)

2.5 (0.5–11.6)

 

Partner of HIV-infected individual

27 (0.0)

5

1,852(387–3,317)

545 (169–999)

420 (110–999)

STI risk group

CSW

399 (0.1)

0

0.0

-

-

 

Bar employee

87602 (31.2)

12

1.4 (0.6–2.2)

0.3 (0.1–0.8)

0.9 (0.4–2.2)

 

Tea room employee

27353 (9.8)

2

0.7 (0.0–1.7)

0.2 (0.0–0.8)

0.8 (0.2–3.8)

 

Massage parlor

1535 (0.6)

0

0.0

-

-

 

Others**

27805 (9.9)

7

2.5 (0.7–4.4)

0.6 (0.2–1.6)

2.1(0.7–5.9)

CI: Confidence Interval, OR: Odds Ratio, TB: tuberculosis, CSW; commercial sexual worker.

HIV TRG: HIV test recommended group. HIV ISG: HIV infection suspected group. STI: sexually transmitted infection.

*Employees of motels, restaurants, and beauty salons, etc.

**One among four subgroup in STI risk group, but not specified.

Discussion

HIV testing policy in Korea has been changed. Mandatory HIV testing was dominated until 1990's and it gradually has been moved to the voluntary HIV testing in hospitals or clinics. In 2005, hospitals or clinics conducted 55% of HIV screening tests in Korea, and detected 75% of the newly diagnosed HIV infections. [16] However, the HIV testing takers in PHCs occupied approximately 6% of the screening tests and comprised 19% (149 individuals or 5.3 per 10,000 individuals) of the newly diagnosed in Korea.

People aged 30–49 years, foreigners, metropolitan inhabitants, the HIV ISG, and the HIV TRG showed high seroprevalence. The high seroprevalence in the HIV ISG was due to suspicions by doctors and voluntary test takers experiencing symptoms or risky behaviors. The proportion of HIV-infected male who found in 2005 was 94% and all of them were infected by sexual contact. According to survey for HIV transmission route, the proportion of homosexual contact is 47.0%, heterosexual contact 52.8%, and others 0.2%. However, many males who were categorized into heterosexual contacts at the initial interview were later changed into homosexual contacts [17], and it is doubtful if homosexual contact might be a dominant route in Korea. Epidemiological studies for Japan and Thailand showed high prevalent in the aged 30–49 years for men having sex with men (MSM) [18, 19]. The prevalent of the HIV ISG for the male and the aged 30–49 years might be due to MSM. However, we do not have any information about this, and it will be requested to study the sexual behavior in order to find the characteristics of HIV transmission route in Korea.

HIV seroprevalence in the aged 20–29 years was lower than those in older individuals. This is similar to the seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) [20] but differs from HIV seroprevalence in the U.S., Russia, and the many European countries [2123].

There are about 910,000 foreigners in Korea, and about 65% are from China, the Philippines, Thailand, Viet Nam, and Russia. [24]. Foreigners who are engaged in entertainment or sports for more than 3 months are required to take HIV tests in accordance with the Prevention Act for Acquired Immunological Deficiency Syndrome [7]. In this study, foreigners revealed significantly higher seroprevalence than native Korean (p < 0.0001). Two of 18 HIV-infected foreigners belonged to the STI risk group (14.1 per 10,000 individuals) and the others were included the General group (21.0 per 10,000 individuals). The major reason to take tests in the General group was to get medical certification, which contributed to the high seroprevalence. For the foreigners, medical certification approved by a compulsory medical checkup is required for a job or for residence, which may be a stricter requirement compared with the cases of Koreans. About 12% of the newly diagnosed HIV infections in PHCs were foreigners. In Japan, this is 13% in 2004, which the infectious status is similar to our result [25]. The Korean government provides foreigners with free of charge HIV testing, counseling, education, and medical tests in PHCs to prevent domestic population from new HIV infection, also to take care the foreigners' health.

The female in the STI risk group is to take a mandatory test every six months, but we found that the number of HIV test in them was less than twice per year. HIV-infected females from the STI risk group cannot be gainfully employed in businesses with routine testing. Therefore people employed in the high risk industries will likely take anonymous tests. If they are positive, they do not take due mandatory test, will leave the industry or go underground. The seroprevalence of female is lower in the STI risk group than in the General group, so that the change in testing policy for STI risk group need to be considered. A limitation of mandatory testing was demonstrated in Austria where HIV prevalence among registered CSWs is 0%, but it is 3.7% among illegal sex workers [26].

HIV infection is a major health problem in prisons around the world [27, 28], and they show higher seroprevalence than other groups in Korea, although the reasons were not addressed in this study. HIV seroprevalence in metropolitan cities was higher than that in small towns or rural areas, and this result is similar to other countries [29].

The HIV seroprevalence in tuberculosis (TB) patients treated in PHCs was similar to that in the General group. Although Korea is under low HIV prevalence, and is under intermediate TB burden; the TB prevalence was estimated 12.3 per 10,000 in 2006 by WHO [30]. TB is the most common opportunistic infection in AIDS patients, and AIDS is a major cause of TB or pneumocystis-associated deaths in Korea [31, 32]. However, HIV testing is not compulsory to TB patients in Korea, so it is difficult to find HIV prevalence among them. Fortunately, we could find HIV infections of TB patients in our study because TB patients in PHCs were recommended to take HIV tests.

By statute, the STI risk group and the HIV TRG are required to take mandatory testing at PHCs for the prevention of HIV transmission, and the HIV ISG to take voluntary tests for early detection. For the General group, HIV testing is free of charge, which leads low-income individuals to take test in PHCs. We can find the status of seroprevalence in each group and compare to characteristics of seroprevalence among groups, through taking mandatory testing and voluntary testing under the national HIV surveillance system. Our results were derived from the national HIV surveillance data collected by the HCIS. HIV seroprevalence of visitors to PHCs can be used for the evaluation of community health policy as well as national HIV/AIDS and STI policy. Therefore our results were highly significant to the study of HIV epidemiology in PHC testing takers.

Our study had several limitations. First, The General group included about 31% of the total testing takers in PHCs, and included major individuals with low income who were tested due to job, or welfare requirement. Therefore, patterns of HIV seroprevalence in the General group identified in this study may not be nationally representative. Secondly, the seroprevalence in the STI risk group may be underestimated because of the possibility that the individuals could undergo anonymous testing prior to mandatory testing. Third, the HIV seroprevalence (5.3 per 10,000 individuals) might be underestimated due to excluding the anonymous testing takers. In 2005, 35 HIV positive cases were detected among 9,877 anonymous tests at PHCs and their positivity were very higher for 35.4 per 10,000 tests. Fourth, getting medical certification for a job or residence application in the General group seems to be mandatory currently. This is more common in foreign workers.

Conclusion

UNAIDS/WHO do not support mandatory testing of individuals except blood donors on public health grounds. Voluntary testing is more likely to result in behaviors change to avoid transmission HIV [33]. Also, our result revealed that voluntary testing might be superior in identification of HIV-infected individuals, since HIV seroprevalence was low in the STI risk group while high in the HIV ISG. In addition, the mandatory testing on STI risk group raises a conflicting issue between human rights of the group vs. prevention of STI transmission. It is currently discussed to change the policy on the national HIV testing in Korea. We suggest there are needs in Korea to develop a method encouraging more people to take voluntary tests at PHCs and also to expand anonymous testing centers and Voluntary Counseling and Testing Program (VCT) for general population to easily access to HIV testing.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to the Division of HIV and TB control at the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for supplying the HIV positive data and thank to the 17 local Institutions of Health and the Environment for supplying the HIV test data from 245 Public Health Centers used in this research.

This project (study on HIV/AIDS seroprevalence in the Republic of Korea) was funded through Intramural Research Grant by Korea National Institute of Health.

The name of the ethics committee which approved our study:

KOREA CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB)

KCDC IRB decided that this study needed not receive the informed consents because of the characteristic of data itself: personal IDs were not systematically informed to the KCDC investigators.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of AIDS, Center for Immunology and Pathology, Korea National Institute of Health, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(2)
Division of Epidemic Intelligence Service, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

References

  1. Yong KH, Shin YO, Yoon JD, Choi JH, Lee HR, Kang C: Studies on HTLV-III (AIDS) and related virus infection. Report of the National Institute of Health, Korea. 1987, 24: 539-549.Google Scholar
  2. CDC, HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, CDC. 2001, 13: 1-44.Google Scholar
  3. Jonatham M, Daniel JM, Tarantola , Netter Thomas, Editors: AIDS in the World, A Global Report, Harvard. 1992, 893-901.Google Scholar
  4. Shin YO, Kim TS, Hur SJ, Lee WS, Kim SS, KEE MK, Choi BS, Cho YK, Jeon WK, Kim EK, Kim YB, Cho Sk Lee SW: Seroepidemiological study on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in Korea. Report of the National Institute of Health, Korea. 1992, 29: 157-164.Google Scholar
  5. Shin YO, Jang YS, Hur SJ, Kim SS, Kee MK, Choi BS: Seroepidemiological study on human immunodeficiency virus infection in Korea(II). Report of the National Institute of Health, Korea. 1993, 30: 163-172.Google Scholar
  6. Shin YO, Kee MK: Health care systems in transition II. Korea, Part II. The current status of HIV-AIDS in Korea. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1998, 20: 47-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guideline for HIV/AIDS. 2005, KCDCGoogle Scholar
  8. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for sexually transmitted diseases control. 2005, KCDCGoogle Scholar
  9. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) and World Health Organization: AIDS epidemic update: Special Report on HIV Prevention. 2005, WHO, [http://www.unaids.org/epi/2005/]Google Scholar
  10. Ministry of Health: People's Republic of China Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS. 2005 Update on the HIV/AIDS Epidemic and Response in China. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  11. UNAIDS: Overview of the Global AIDS Epidemic, 2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic. 2006, UNAIDS, Chapter 2:Google Scholar
  12. Korea Immigration Bureau: The Registered Foreigners According to Nationality and Eligibility in 2004. 2004, Korea Immigration BureauGoogle Scholar
  13. World Health Organization: HIV/AIDS in Asia and the Pacific Region 2003, HIV/AIDS status and trends in the Asia Pacific Region. 2003, WHOGoogle Scholar
  14. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: The status of HIV/AIDS infection of Korea, Guidelines for HIV/AIDS Control. 2006, KCDCGoogle Scholar
  15. Kee Mee-Kyung, Lee Eun-Ju, Lee Jin-Hee, Kim Sung-Soon: Trends in HIV seroprevalence in public health centers and blood bank(blood donations) in Republic of Korea; 2000–2007. Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy. 2007, 38 (Supplement 1):Google Scholar
  16. Lee Jin-Hee, Lee Eun-Ju, Kyung-Mee Jeun Hak-Joon Ahn, Sung-Soon Kim Mee-Kyung Kee: Estimate of HIV seroprevalence and the number of HIV testing for hospitals and clinic centers in Korea; 2002–2007. Infectious Diseases and Korean Society for Chemotherapy. 2008, 40 (Supplement 2): S211-Google Scholar
  17. Kee Mee-Kyung, Park Chul-Min, Chang Chang-Gok, Go Un-Yeong: Sexual Behavioral Characteristics and the Knowledge of HIV/AIDS among Men who have Sex with Men in Republic of Korea. J Pre Med Public Health. 2004, 37 (3): 220-224.Google Scholar
  18. UNAIDS/WHO: UNGASS country progress report Japan December 2007. Overview of the AIDS epidemic. 2007, Geneva, UNAIDS/WHOGoogle Scholar
  19. CDC: HIV Prevalence Among Populations of Men Who Have Sex with Men – Thailand. 2003 and 2005 CDC MMWR. 2006, 55: 844-848.Google Scholar
  20. Shin HR, Franceschi s, Vaccarella S, Roh JW, Ju YH, Oh JK, Kong HJ, Rha SH, Jung SI, Kin JL, Jung KY, nab Doorn LJ, Quint W: Age-specific prevalence of infection with HSV-2 in urban areas of Korea. 22nd NRL Workshop on Serology, Australia Melbourne. 2006, 10: 16-19.Google Scholar
  21. Espinoza Lorena MPH, Irene Hall H, Hardnett Felicia, Selik Richard, Ling Qiang, Lee Lisa: Characteristics of Persons with Heterosexually acquired HIV infection, United States 1999–2004. American Journal of Public Health. 2007, 97: 144-149. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.077461.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Drain PK, Smith JS, Hughes JP, Halperin DT, Holmes KK: Correlates of national HIV seroprevalence: an ecologic analysis of 122 developing countries. JAIDS. 2004, 35: 407-420.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. UNAIDS/WHO: AIDS epidemic update, December 2004. 2004, Geneva, UNAIDS/WHOGoogle Scholar
  24. Ministry of Justice Republic of Korea: Korea Immigration Service, statistical annual report. 2006, Ministry of Justice Republic of Korea, chapter 2: 258-260.Google Scholar
  25. Masaki, INABA, General information on HIV/AIDS in Japan, Epidemiological Situation: Program Coordinator on HIV/AIDS and Infectious Diseases. Africa Japan Forum. 2006Google Scholar
  26. EuroHIV, Euro HIV 2006 survey on HIV and AIDS surveillance in the WHO European Region, Infectious disease: Testing policies and practices. 2006, EuroHIV, [http://www.invs.sante.fr]Google Scholar
  27. Dolan B, Kite E, Black C, Aceijas G, Stimson : Reference Group on HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care among Injecting Drug Users in Developing and Transitional Countries. HIV in prison in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2007, 7: 32-41. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70685-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pont J, Strutz H, Kahl W, Salzer G: HIV epidemiology and risk behavior promoting HIV transmission in Austrian Prisons. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994, 10 (3): 285-289. 10.1007/BF01719351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Garry P Wormser, Editor: AIDS and Other Manifestations of HIV Infection. 2004, I, Elsevier academic press; Elsevier (USA), 11-15. FourthGoogle Scholar
  30. WHO: WHO Global Tuberculosis Control Surveillance, Planning, Financing. 2006, WHO Report, Geneva, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim JM, Cho GJ, Hong SK, Chang KH, Chung JS, Choi YH, Song YG, Huh A, Yeom JS, Lee KS, Choi JY: Epidemiology and clinical features of HIV infection/AIDS in Korea. Yonsei Med J. 2003, 44: 363-370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Oh MD, Park SW, Kim HB, Seok KIM, Kim NJ, Choi HJ, Shin DH, Lee JS, Choe K: Spectrum of opportunistic infectious and malignancies in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection in South Korea. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 1524-1528. 10.1086/313516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. UNAIDS/WHO: UNAIDS/WHO Policy Statement on HIV Testing. 2004, UNAIDS/WHOGoogle Scholar
  34. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/123/prepub

Copyright

© Kee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement