Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Effects of a combined lifestyle score on 10-year mortality in Korean men and women: a prospective cohort study

BMC Public Health201212:673

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-673

©  Yun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

  • Received: 19 January 2012
  • Accepted: 26 June 2012
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Most studies that have evaluated the association between combined lifestyle factors and mortality outcomes have been conducted in populations of Caucasian origin. The objective of this study was to examine the association between combined lifestyle scores and the risk of mortality in Korean men and women.

Methods

The study population included 59,941 Koreans, 30–84 years of age, who had visited the Severance Health Promotion Center between 1994 and 2003. Cox regression models were fitted to establish the association between combined lifestyle factors (current smoker, heavy daily alcohol use, overweight or obese weight, physical inactivity, and unhealthy diet) and mortality outcomes.

Results

During 10.3 years of follow-up, there were 2,398 cases of death from any cause. Individual and combined lifestyle factors were found to be associated with the risk of mortality. Compared to those having none or only one risk factor, in men with a combination of four lifestyle factors, the relative risk for cancer mortality was 2.04-fold, for non-cancer mortality 1.92-fold, and for all-cause mortality 2.00-fold. In women, the relative risk was 2.00-fold for cancer mortality, 2.17-fold for non-cancer mortality, and 2.09-fold for all-cause mortality. The population attributable risks for all-cause mortality for the four risk factors combined was 44.5% for men and 26.5% for women.

Conclusion

This study suggests that having a high (unhealthy) lifestyle score, in contrast to a low (healthy) score, can substantially increase the risk of death by any cause, cancer, and non-cancer in Korean men and women.

Keywords

  • Lifestyle factor
  • Mortality
  • Cohort study
  • Population attributable risk

Background

There are many studies that indicate that individual healthy lifestyle factors such as non-smoking, normal weight, moderate alcohol intake, regular exercise, and a healthy diet reduce the risk of various chronic diseases including cancer and cardiovascular disease [1–11]. Cigarette smoking has been identified as the second leading risk factor for death from all causes worldwide [12, 13] and being overweight or obese (and possibly underweight) are associated with increased all-cause mortality[4, 9]. Physical inactivity and heavy alcohol use are related to the risk of mortality, coronary heart disease, and cancer incidence [1, 2, 6, 10]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that lifestyle modification may prevent or slow the incidence of cancer [14–16]. As such, maintaining a healthy lifestyle is becoming a main focus of today’s society.

A number of studies have shown that there is a significant increase in the incidence of cancer and/or mortality when an individual has several bad lifestyle habits measured by scoring individual lifestyle factors. The Nurses’ Health Study of middle-aged women in the United States implicated a combination of lifestyle risk factors in relation to mortality [17]. In the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC)-Norfolk study, lifestyle factors were studied in relation to mortality in both men and women between the ages of 45 and 74 at study initiation [18]. In another study of older individuals in the United States, the risk of pancreatic cancer was found to be significantly lower in participants with combined healthy lifestyle scores. A combined lifestyle score was calculated by summing the scores of the lifestyle factors. These studies have been conducted in specific populations of Caucasian origin [17–20], the elderly [19, 21] or in women only [8, 17, 22]. Few studies have examined the relationship between combined lifestyle factors and mortality in East Asian countries [22, 23].

The Korean lifestyle differs from that of Western and European societies. For example, despite the extremely high prevalence of smoking, populations in Korea tend to be leaner and have lower levels of serum cholesterol and perhaps less atherosclerosis than their Western counterparts [24]. Thus, research is needed in this area on ethnic minority populations. Therefore, we evaluated the association between combined lifestyle scores and risk of total and cause-specific mortality in the Korean Cancer Prevention Study.

Methods

Study population

The cohort consisted of 70,843 Korean men and women who participated in at least one medical evaluation at the Severance Health Promotion Center between 1994 and 2003. Study participants included people who were over the age of 30 (n = 65,520). To avoid confounding the association of lifestyle factors with mortality due to any pre-existing conditions, we excluded 787 participants who reported having cardiovascular disease and any cancer at or prior to their initial visit. In addition, 4,792 subjects with missing information with regards to smoking status and alcohol intake were also excluded. The final study sample consisted of 59,941 subjects. The mean follow-up period was 10.3 years, through December 31, 2009. The Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University College of Medicine approved this study.

Data collection

Data were collected from participants who underwent medical examinations from 1994 to 2003. A skilled data entry clerk entered results from questionnaire surveys and medical assessments obtained from participants who underwent examinations at the health promotion center. The examinations were performed according to a standard protocol. Each participant was interviewed using a structured questionnaire to collect the lifestyle data. Data from the baseline interview were used to assess the lifestyle factors of interest. Participants were asked to describe their smoking habit (never smoker, ex-smoker, or current smoker), alcohol consumption (non-drinker or drinker of any amount of alcohol), exercise routine (exercise or non-exercise) as well as other demographic characteristics such as age, gender, and past history of diabetes or hypertension. Body weight and height were measured while participants were wearing light clothing and body mass index (BMI) was calculated based on weight and height information.

Lifestyle factor scoring

We were interested in lifestyle-related factors that are simple to assess and have been well-studied previously in relation to mortality. We used a binary score for each lifestyle factor. Participants received 1 point for each of the following applicable conditions: current smoker (currently smoking or quit smoking < 10 years ago), heavy daily alcohol use (> 2 drinks for men or > 1 drink for women), overweight or obese (BMI > 25), or physically inactive (physical activity never, rarely, or < 3 times per week), otherwise they received 0 points for each factor. We assigned a lifestyle score 1 ranging from 0 (healthiest) to 4 (unhealthy or least healthy) to each participant by summing the binary scores for each of the four lifestyle factors (i.e. smoking, alcohol use, BMI, and physical activity). For the purposes of data analysis, we merged non-lifestyle risk factor group and one lifestyle risk factor group due to a small number of cases of mortality in the first category. In addition, we performed subgroup analysis on subjects who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption. In the subgroup analysis for lifestyle score 2, we excluded 18,376 participants with missing information on fruit and vegetable consumption. Lifestyle score 2 ranged from 0 (healthiest) to 5 (unhealthy or least healthy) for each participant by summing the binary scores for each of the four lifestyle factors (i.e. smoking, alcohol use, BMI, physical activity, and fruit and vegetable consumption). The frequency of fruit and vegetable intake was divided into quartiles and calculated as the sum of the number of servings per day of fruits and vegetables consumed according to questionnaire answers (Moon et al., 1980). We considered participants in the highest quartile to be in the low risk category (healthy diet) as far as diet was concerned.

Outcome variables

Participants were followed-up through December 31, 2009. The principal outcome variables were all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and non-cancer mortality. Outcomes for mortality were confirmed by matching the information to the death records from the National Statistical Office. In Korea, there are certified medical chart recorders who review and abstract the medical chart and assign discharge diagnosis in a standardized form using WHO (World Health Organization) codes. The recorders also complete death certificates based on the information provided by physicians. A computerized search of the death certificate data from the National Statistical Office in Korea was performed using the unique identification number assigned at birth. Mortality from cancer was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes (ICD-10 codes, C00 to C99).

Statistical analysis

Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the independent and combined effects of lifestyle factors on mortality. All analyses were stratified by sex. We computed hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards modeling to adjust for age. We calculated the population attributable risk (PAR) from the lifestyle score on the risk of mortality [25]. Trend analyses were conducted to test the linearity of the association between the numbers of lifestyle scores and mortality risk. All analyses were conducted using SAS, version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.

Results

Over 10.3 years of follow-up, there were 2,398 deaths from all causes (1,591 in men, 807 in women), including 1,108 from cancer (799 in men, 309 in women) and 1,290 non-cancer deaths (792 in men, 498 in women). The general characteristics of the 31,850 male and 28,091 female study participants at baseline are shown in Table 1. Men were younger and had higher blood pressure, total cholesterol, and fasting blood glucose levels than women (P < 0.05 for all). Significantly higher rates of smoking, alcohol intake, and regular exercise were also observed in men compared to women. The percentages of subjects with the healthiest score (0 point) were 0.65% and 1.01% for men and women, respectively. Notably, there was a significant gap between men and women having the worst score (4 points) at 15.3% and 1.6%, respectively.
Table 1

General characteristics of the study population

 

Men (n = 31,850)

Women (n = 28,091)

 

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Age, y

46.7 ± 10.6

47.7 ± 10.6

Body mass index, kg/m2

24.2 ± 2.9

23.5 ± 3.2

Systolic blood pressure, mm Hg

124.5 ± 19.3

121.7 ± 20.9

Diastolic blood pressure, mm Hg

73.1 ± 12.1

72.4 ± 11.9

Total cholesterol, mg/dL

197.0 ± 35.1

196.0 ± 37.5

Fasting blood glucose, mg/dL

98.6 ± 26.0

94.0 ± 22.0

 

n (%)

n (%)

Smoking status

  

Never smoked

9,298 (29.2)

25,940 (92.3)

Ever smoked

22,552 (70.8)

2,151 (7.7)

Adiposity

  

Normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25)

18,726 (58.8)

18,639 (66.4)

Overweight or underweight

13,124 (41.2)

9,452 (33.7)

Physical activity

  

≥ 3 times per week

14,634 (46.0)

9,981 (35.5)

< 3 times per week

17,216 (54.0)

18,110 (64.5)

Alcohol intake

  

Light to moderate alcohol intake

1,646 (5.2)

873 (3.1)

Heavier drinking or abstaining

30,204 (94.8)

27,218 (96.9)

Fruit and vegetable consumption

  

Healthy diet (highest quartile)

6,917 (30.9)

4,238 (22.1)

Unhealthy diet

15,454 (69.1)

14,956 (77.9)

No. of lifestyle score 1

  

0-1

3,511 (11.0)

6,768 (24.1)

2

10,099 (31.7)

13,973 (49.7)

3

13,366 (42.0)

6,899 (24.6)

4

4,874 (15.3)

451 (1.6)

No. of lifestyle score 2

  

0-1

1,055 (4.7)

1,384 (7.21)

2

4,014 (17.9)

5,791 (30.2)

3

7,714 (34.5)

8,298 (43.2)

4

7,326 (32.8)

3,470 (18.1)

5

2,262 (10.1)

251 (1.3)

Data are expressed as mean ± SD or percent.

BMI body mass index.

Table 2 shows the main effect of each factor on the risk of mortality. In all subjects, after adjusting for the other risk factors, smoking and less physical activity were associated with a statistically significant increased risk of all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality. Alcohol use and BMI were not significant factors, but there was a trend implying that severe alcohol consumption and being overweight or obese were associated with an increased risk of mortality. In addition, we did the analyses with underweight and overweight separately. This study has found no correlation between being overweight with mortality. However, underweight was associated with all cause mortality in men and non-cancer mortality in men and women (data not shown). The estimated PAR for smoking was higher than for other lifestyle factors (data not shown).
Table 2

Hazard ratios* (95% confidence intervals) of all cause, cancer, and non cancer mortality

 

All-cause deaths

Cancer deaths

Non-cancer deaths

Lifestyle factors

Men

Women

Men

Women

Men

Women

Ever vs. never smoked

1.46 (1.30-1.65)

1.72 (1.34-2.22)

1.64 (1.39-1.94)

1.43 (0.95-2.16)

1.29 (1.09-1.54)

1.96 (1.42-2.70)

Overweight or underweight vs. normal weight (18.5 ≤ BMI < 25)

1.03 (0.92-1.14)

0.98 (0.83-1.15)

0.95 (0.82-1.11)

1.04 (0.81-1.32)

1.12 (0.96-1.31)

0.94 (0.75-1.16)

Physical activity <3 times per wk vs. ≥3 times per wk

1.35 (1.20-1.51)

1.45 (0.60-3.51)

1.28 (1.09-1.49)

1.07 (0.82-1.38)

1.44 (1.22-1.70)

1.69 (1.31-2.19)

Heavier drinking or abstaining vs. light to moderate alcohol intake

1.09 (0.78-1.52)

1.36 (1.14-1.64)

1.19 (0.75-1.91)

3.45 (0.48-24.62)

0.98 (0.61-1.57)

0.96 (0.35-2.58)

* Hazard ratios adjusted for age and other risk factors included in the table.

Table 3 shows the effects of combinations of lifestyle factors on the risk of all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality which increased as the number of risk factors increased. In the data analysis, we merged a risk factor group having none of risk factors and another risk factor group having only one lifestyle risk factor due to a small number of cases of mortality in the first category. Compared to none or one risk factor, the relative risk of a combination of four lifestyle factors was 2.04-fold for cancer mortality, 1.92-fold for non-cancer mortality and 2.00-fold for all-cause mortality in men, and 2.00-fold for cancer mortality, 2.17-fold for non-cancer mortality and 2.09-fold for all-cause mortality in women. This association remained after further adjustment for potential confounder such as education and income (data not shown). The PAR for all-cause mortality for the four risk factors combined was 44.5% for men and 26.5% for women.
Table 3

Hazard ratio of incidence and mortality according to combinations of lifestyle risk factors

 

Lifestyle risk factors

PAR(%) for having any of the four risk factors

 

≤1 risk factor

2 risk factors

3 risk factors

4 risk factors

Men

     

Cancer deaths

     

Cases

66

242

358

108

48.7

HR* (95% CI)

1.00

1.65 (1.26-2.17)

2.29 (1.76-2.99)

2.36 (1.73-3.22)

 

HR† (95% CI)

1.00

1.65 (1.23-2.22)

2.13 (1.59-2.85)

2.04 (1.45-2.87)

 

Non-cancer deaths

     

Cases

75

220

336

134

40.4

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.26 (0.95-1.66)

1.79 (1.38-2.34)

2.56 (1.90-3.45)

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.04 (0.77-1.39)

1.34 (1.00-1.78)

1.92 (1.39-2.64)

 

All-cause deaths

     

Cases

141

462

694

242

44.5

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.45 (1.19-1.76)

2.04 (1.69-2.46)

2.47 (1.99-3.06)

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.32 (1.07-1.63)

1.71 (1.39-2.09)

2.00 (1.58-2.52)

 

Women

     

Cancer deaths

     

Cases

53

133

106

11

17.3

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.06 (0.77-1.46)

1.37 (0.98-1.91)

2.15 (1.12-4.13)

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.03 (0.72-1.48)

1.04 (0.70-1.54)

2.00 (0.93-4.29)

 

Non-cancer deaths

     

Cases

76

215

170

17

33.8

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.30 (0.96-1.77)

1.80 (1.31-2.46)

2.69 (1.52-4.78)

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.27 (0.89-1.81)

1.68 (1.16-2.44)

2.17 (1.01-4.67)

 

All-cause deaths

     

Cases

129

348

276

28

26.5

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.18 (0.95-1.47)

1.59 (1.26-1.99)

2.43 (1.58-3.73)

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.15 (0.89-1.48)

1.35 (1.03-1.77)

2.09 (1.22-3.59)

 

* Hazard ratios and population attributable risks adjusted for age.

† Hazard ratios adjusted for age, income, and education.

In addition, we performed subgroup analysis on subjects who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption. HRs were higher for non-cancer mortality than for cancer mortality in these men and women. HRs for mortality was increasing with the number of lifestyle risk factors in both men and women (p for trend <0.05). Results for participants who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption were consistent with results of the entire study population (Table 4).
Table 4

Mortality hazard ratios according to combinations of lifestyle risk factors among subjects who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption

 

Lifestyle risk factors

P for trend

 

≤1 risk factor

2 risk factors

3 risk factors

4 risk factors

5 risk factors

Men

      

Cancer deaths

      

Cases

17

66

172

151

40

 

HR* (95% CI)

1.00

1.15 (0.67-1.95)

1.99 (1.21-3.28)

2.23 (1.35-3.69)

2.40 (1.36-4.25)

0.0095

HR† (95% CI)

1.00

1.12 (0.62-2.02)

1.91 (1.10-3.32)

1.94 (1.11-3.39)

1.74 (0.91-3.31)

0.0960

Non-cancer deaths

      

Cases

15

62

138

161

47

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.33 (0.71-2.48)

1.83 (1.01-3.32)

2.74 (1.52-4.94)

3.25 (1.71-6.18)

0.0017

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.04 (0.55-1.97)

1.25 (0.68-2.28)

1.82 (1.00-3.33)

2.10 (1.08-4.06)

0.0106

All-cause deaths

      

Cases

32

128

310

312

87

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.22 (0.82-1.83)

1.92 (1.31-2.81)

2.44 (1.67-3.58)

2.77 (1.81-4.23)

0.0014

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.08 (0.70-2.39)

1.59 (1.06-2.39)

1.89 (1.25-2.85)

1.93 (1.22-3.06)

0.0091

Women

      

Cancer deaths

      

Cases

5

47

65

52

5

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.88 (0.75-4.72)

1.69 (0.68-4.20)

2.71 (1.08-6.80)

3.68 (1.06-12.75)

0.0136

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.86 (0.66-5.23)

1.60 (0.57-4.47)

2.07 (0.72-5.94)

2.96 (0.66-13.35)

0.0313

Non-cancer deaths

      

Cases

10

49

119

72

8

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

2.15 (0.66-7.03)

3.72 (1.18-11.78)

5.12 (1.60-16.36)

6.93 (1.73-27.84)

0.0002

HR (95% CI)

1.00

2.66 (0.63-11.24)

4.10 (1.00-16.88)

5.85 (1.40-24.43)

8.74 (1.59-48.14)

0.0013

All-cause deaths

      

Cases

15

96

184

124

13

 

HR (95% CI)

1.00

1.98 (0.96-4.09)

2.45 (1.20-5.00)

3.61 (1.76-7.42)

4.90 (1.97-12.23)

0.0015

HR (95% CI)

1.00

2.13 (0.92-4.93)

2.43 (1.06-5.55)

3.32 (1.43-7.69)

4.85 (1.62-14.52)

0.0042

* Hazard ratios adjusted for age.

† Hazard ratios adjusted for age, income, and education.

Discussion

In this cohort study, over a period of 10 years, we found multiple lifestyle factors to be associated with mortality from cancer, non-cancer, and all causes. The unhealthy lifestyle factors evaluated were each associated with noticeably greater mortality. Also, we found the risk of all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality to be significantly higher in participants who had the highest combined unhealthy lifestyle scores (currently smoking, no physical activity, overweight, and heavier alcohol consumption) compared to participants with the lowest score. By adherence to these four healthy lifestyle guidelines, we estimated a decrease in mortality of approximately 44.5% for men and 26.5% for women due to all causes, 48.7% for men and 17.3% for women from cancer, and 40.4% for men and 33.8% for women for non-cancer mortality. These trends are similar to the results of subgroup analysis on subjects who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Previous studies have demonstrated individual risks or protective factors which could be used to predict mortality. Each lifestyle factor, such as smoking, alcohol use, diet, BMI, and physical activity has been studied independently in relation to mortality or cancer incidence [17, 21]. In this study, the association between alcohol use, BMI and mortality were not significant, but cigarette smoking and physical inactivity were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. In the Nurses’ Health Study, each lifestyle factor, including heavier drinking, and being overweight, independently and significantly predicted mortality [17]. Long-term regular exercise is known to induce biochemical changes to the blood and heart which increase energy productivity and physical activity as well as prevent coronary heart disease. Moreover, people with high physical activity levels such as sports players have better lipid attributes which implies that they have lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than people who are more sedentary [26, 27].

Few studies have evaluated the effects of lifestyle factor combinations on chronic disease [17–21, 28]. The findings of the present study are in concordance with direction and magnitude of association of several previous studies. The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study reported that the combination of four health behaviors predicted a 4-fold difference in total mortality [18]. The Nurses’ Health Study also pointed out that combinations of lifestyle factors are related to mortality; however, only Caucasian women were evaluated [17]. A large cohort study including 450,416 participants found an association between combined healthy lifestyle scores and the risk of pancreatic cancer [21]. Only two Asian studies including a Japanese study and a study of Chinese women showed a significant association between lifestyle-related factors and mortality [22, 23]. Most previous studies involving lifestyle factors and chronic diseases were conducted in Caucasians, or the elderly, or in women only; therefore, the Korean Cancer Prevention Study II is of great value due to the fact that an association between lifestyle factors and mortality was confirmed in Korean men and women.

Lifestyle factors, besides having a direct effect on mortality, may also act indirectly. On average, those with a particular negative habit as a lifestyle factor are more likely to have negative habits related to other lifestyle factors and a bad lifestyle pattern in general [29]. For example, physical inactivity may act via other behavioral factors, such as obesity, to affect mortality; as such, one lifestyle factor (e.g., physical inactivity), may be a surrogate for another (e.g., obesity) [30]. Health behaviors are complex and consist of multiple dimensions; thus, using a lifestyle pattern analysis may capture the influence of multiple health behaviors better than analysis based on individual health behaviors [21]. Consequently, multiple lifestyle behavior adjustments such as quitting smoking, increasing physical activity, controlling weight, reducing alcohol consumption, and paying more attention to diet, may lead to decreased mortality. These potential relationships between lifestyle factors and mortality warrant further study.

Our study has several strengths. The present study used a population-based prospective cohort study design and a relatively large sample size. The prospective design minimizes differential misclassification of exposure status. Few investigations have shown the beneficial effects of a healthy lifestyle scores on any-cause, cancer, or cardiovascular mortality in the Asian population. Our research demonstrated the relationship between combined lifestyle factors and total or type-specific mortality. We can see the mortality from all causes, any cancer, and non cancer, simultaneously. Further large prospective studies are required to evaluate the link between lifestyle factors and site-specific cancer incidence, as well as to determine the mechanisms involved. In addition, this study population has their unique characteristics compared to those in previous investigations. Koreans represent one of the world’s most ethnically and genetically homogeneous populations and ideal for association studies. As such, all subjects in this study were of the same ethnicity, Korean [31].

Several potential limitations of this study must also be considered. Participants of this study were not randomly selected. Also, the representativeness of the background population is limited because study subjects were recruited individually as they went to the health promotion center to check their health status. Although the study subjects were a general population, they might have better health-related behavior or higher socioeconomic status than others because they chose to take a routine health examination. Participants may have underreported their smoking status and alcohol consumption in the self-report questionnaires. In addition, lifestyle changes before and after baseline assessments were not taken into account. Also, we did not sufficiently consider diet in scoring lifestyle factors even though diet is a vital factor in determining links between death and disease due to the insufficient data on nutrition survey (such as food frequency questionnaire) related to participant nutrition. Rather than considering the entire dietary quality, we performed a subgroup analysis using data from those who provided information on fruit and vegetable consumption. Finally, when considering the association between lifestyle score and mortality, we were unable to use cause-specific mortality and only considered cancer and non-cancer deaths.

Conclusions

In conclusion, based upon our findings, combined non-healthy lifestyle factors including smoking, heavier alcohol consumption, obesity, and lack of physical activity may be directly implicated in the increased risk of all-cause, cancer, and non-cancer mortality in Korean men and women. The findings highlight the importance of overall lifestyle modification in disease prevention, and this information should provide incentive to Asian populations to consider healthy lifestyle choices.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant (10526) from the Seoul City R&BD Program, the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (0920330).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Rehabilitation Standard & Policy, Korea National Rehabilitation Research Institute, Seoul, South Korea
(2)
Institute for Health Promotion, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
(3)
Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Graduate School of Public Health, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

References

  1. Andersen LB, Schnohr P, Schroll M, Hein HO: All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch Intern Med. 2000, 160 (11): 1621-1628. 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1621.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrieta A, Russell LB: Effects of leisure and non-leisure physical activity on mortality in U.S. adults over two decades. Ann Epidemiol. 2008, 18 (12): 889-895. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Batty GD, Kivimaki M, Gray L, Smith GD, Marmot MG, Shipley MJ: Cigarette smoking and site-specific cancer mortality: testing uncertain associations using extended follow-up of the original Whitehall study. Ann Oncol. 2008, 19 (5): 996-1002. 10.1093/annonc/mdm578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. BerringtondeGonzalez A, Hartge P, Cerhan JR, Flint AJ, Hannan L, MacInnis RJ, Moore SC, Tobias GS, Anton-Culver H, Freeman LB, Beeson WL, Clipp SL, English DR, Folsom AR, Freedman DM, Giles G, Hakansson N, Henderson KD, Hoffman-Bolton J, Hoppin JA, Koenig KL, Lee IM, Linet MS, Park Y, Pocobelli G, Schatzkin A, Sesso HD, Weiderpass E, Willcox BJ, Wolk A, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Willett WC, Thun MJ: Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363 (23)): 2211-2219.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I: Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004, 328 (7455): 1519-10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Gmel G, Gutjahr E, Rehm J: How stable is the risk curve between alcohol and all-cause mortality and what factors influence the shape? a precision-weighted hierarchical meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2003, 18 (7): 631-642.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidemann C, Schulze MB, Franco OH, van Dam RM, Mantzoros CS, Hu FB: Dietary patterns and risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all causes in a prospective cohort of women. Circulation. 2008, 118 (3): 230-237. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.771881.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz G, Liu S, Solomon CG, Willett WC: Diet, lifestyle, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. N Engl J Med. 2001, 345 (11): 790-797. 10.1056/NEJMoa010492.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jee SH, Sull JW, Park J, Lee SY, Ohrr H, Guallar E, Samet JM: Body-mass index and mortality in Korean men and women. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 24, 355 (8): 779-787. 10.1056/NEJMoa054017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin Y, Kikuchi S, Tamakoshi A, Wakai K, Kawamura T, Iso H, Ogimoto I, Yagyu K, Obata Y, Ishibashi T, JACC Study Group: Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Japanese men and women: Alcohol consumption and mortality among middle-aged and elderly Japanese men and women. Ann Epidemiol. 2005 Sep, 15 (8): 590-597. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.10.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Vineis P, Alavanja M, Buffler P, Fontham E, Franceschi S, Gao YT, Gupta PC, Hackshaw A, Matos E, Samet J, Sitas F, Smith J, Stayner L, Straif K, Thun MJ, Wichmann HE, Wu AH, Zaridze D, Peto R, Doll R: Tobacco and cancer: recent epidemiological evidence. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004, 96 (2): 99-106. 10.1093/jnci/djh014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJ: Selected major risk factors for global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002, 360: 1347-1360. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11403-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ: Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet. 2006, 367: 1747-1757. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedenreich CM, Neilson HK, Lunch BM: State of the epidemiologic evidence on physical activity and cancer prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46 (14): 2593-2604. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Petracci E, Decarli A, Schairer C, Pfeiffer RM, Pee D, Masala G, Palli D, Gail MH: Risk factor modification and projections of absolute breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011, 103 (13): 1037-1048. 10.1093/jnci/djr172.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Soerjomataram I, de Vries E, Engholm G, Paludan-Müller G, Brønnum-Hansen H, Storm HH, Barendregt JJ: Impact of a smoking and alcohol intervention programme on lung and breast cancer incidence in Denmark: An example of dynamic modelling with Prevent. Eur J Cancer. 2010, 46 (14): 26-Google Scholar
  17. van Dam RM, Li T, Spiegelman D, Franco OH, Hu FB: Combined impact of lifestyle factors on mortality: prospective cohort study in US women. BMJ. 2008, 337: a1440-10.1136/bmj.a1440.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Khaw KT, Wareham N, Bingham S, Welch A, Luben R, Day N: Combined impact of health behaviours and mortality in men and women: the EPICNorfolk prospective population study. PLoS Med. 2008, 5 (1):  -e12. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050012.Google Scholar
  19. Knoops KT, de Groot LC, Kromhout D, Perrin AE, Moreiras-Varela O, Menotti A, van Staveren WA: Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA. 2004, 292 (12): 1433-1439. 10.1001/jama.292.12.1433.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kvaavik E, Batty GD, Ursin G, Huxley R, Gale CR: Influence of individual and combined health behaviors on total and cause-specific mortality in men and women: the United Kingdom health and lifestyle survey. Arch Intern Med. 2010, 170 (8): 711-718. 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiao L, Mitrou PN, Reedy J, Graubard BI, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Stolzenberg-Solomon R: A combined healthy lifestyle score and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 2009, 169 (8): 764-770. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nechuta SJ, Shu XO, Li HL, Yang G, Xiang YB, Cai H, Chow WH, Ji B, Zhang X, Wen W, Gao YT, Zheng W: Combined impact of lifestyle-related factors on total and cause-specific mortality among Chinese women: prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010, 7 (9): e1000339-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000339.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Tamakoshi A, Tamakoshi K, Lin Y, Yagyu K, Kikuchi S, JACC Study Group: Healthy lifestyle and preventable death: findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study. Prev Med. 2009, 48 (5): 486-492. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.02.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jee SH, Suh I, Kim IS, Appel LJ: Smoking and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in men with low levels of serum cholesterol: the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation Study. JAMA. 1999, 282 (22): 2149-2155. 10.1001/jama.282.22.2149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Wand HC: Point and interval estimates of partial population attributable risks in cohort studies: examples and software. Cancer Causes Control. 2007, 18: 571-579. 10.1007/s10552-006-0090-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM: Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 393-403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuomilehto J, Lindström J, Eriksson JG, Valle TT, Hämäläinen H, Ilanne-Parikka P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Rastas M, Salminen V, Uusitupa M: Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group: Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus by changes in lifestyle among subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 1343-1350. 10.1056/NEJM200105033441801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Huxley RR, Ansary-Moghaddam A, Clifton P, Czernichow S, Parr CL, Woodward M: The impact of dietary and lifestyle risk factors on risk of colorectal cancer: a quantitative overview of the epidemiological evidence. Int J Cancer. 2009, 125 (1): 171-180. 10.1002/ijc.24343.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim S, Popkin BM, Siega-Riz AM, Haines PS, Arab L: A cross-national comparison of lifestyle between China and the United States, using a comprehensive cross-national measurement tool of the healthfulness of lifestyles: the Lifestyle Index. Prev Med. 2004, 38 (2): 160-171. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Podewils LJ, Guallar E, Kuller LH, Fried LP, Lopez OL, Carlson M, Lyketsos CG: Physical activity, APOE genotype, and dementia risk: findings from the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2005, 161 (7): 639-651. 10.1093/aje/kwi092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shen GQ, Li L, Rao S, Abdullah KG, Ban JM, Lee BS, Park JE, Wang QK: Four SNPs on Chromosome 9p21 in a South Korean population implicate a genetic locus that confers high cross-race risk for development of coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008, 28 (2): 360-365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    32. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/673/prepub

Copyright

© Yun et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us