This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Alcohol and marijuana use while driving--an unexpected crash risk in Pakistani commercial drivers: a cross-sectional survey
© Mir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 31 October 2011
Accepted: 27 February 2012
Published: 27 February 2012
A significant proportion of road traffic crashes are attributable to alcohol and marijuana use while driving globally. Sale and use of both substances is illegal in Pakistan and is not considered a threat for road traffic injuries. However literature hints that this may not be the case. We did this study to assess usage of alcohol and marijuana in Pakistani commercial drivers.
A sample of 857 commercial bus and truck drivers was interviewed in October 2008 at the largest commercial vehicle station in Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Time location cluster sampling was used to select the subjects and a structured questionnaire was used to assess the basic demographic profile, substance abuse habits of the drivers while on the road, and reasons for usage of illicit substances while driving were recorded. Self reported information was collected after obtaining informed consent. Chi square and fisher exact tests were used to assess differences between groups and logistic regression was used to identify significant associations between driver characteristics and alcohol and marijuana use.
Almost 10% of truck drivers use alcohol while driving on Pakistani roads. Marijuana use is almost 30% in some groups. Statistically different patterns of usage are seen between population subgroups based on age, ethnicity, education, and marital status. Regression analysis shows association of alcohol and marijuana use with road rage and error behaviours, and also with an increased risk of being involved in road crashes. The reported reasons for using alcohol or marijuana show a general lack of awareness of the hazardous nature of this practice among the commercial driver population.
Alcohol and marijuana use is highly prevalent in Pakistani commercial drivers. The issue needs to be recognized by concerned authorities and methods such as random breath tests and sobriety check points need to be employed for proper law enforcement.
Road traffic crashes (RTCs) account for more than 1.2 million lives lost annually across the globe . This loss is accompanied by almost 50 million injuries, an important contributor to the global disability burden . Most of this burden is borne by the low and middle income countries of the world . By the year 2030, road traffic injuries (RTIs) will be the fifth leading cause of death , most of this increase is projected to be in the low-middle income countries (LMICs).
Intoxicants such as alcohol and marijuana affect the mental state of drivers leading to altered perceptions and delayed reactions, increasing the risk for having RTCs [3–6]. Alcohol results in impairment of brake reaction time, speed control, steering responsiveness and lane control, while marijuana causes deficits in tracking, attention, reaction time, short-term memory, hand eye coordination, decision making, and concentration [7, 8]. Alcohol also increases the tendency of involvement in high risk behaviors on the road such as speeding [9, 10]; crash culpability is directly associated with intoxicant use . While up to twenty-one percent of road traffic crashes may be attributable to alcohol consumption alone in some regions of the world , alcohol consumed in combination with marijuana compounds the risk of an RTI .
Commercial heavy vehicle crashes due to substance abuse can be very hazardous for both the drivers and for other vehicle occupants involved in the crash . This is kept in check in developed countries by strict substance abuse monitoring mechanisms for this population leading to low levels of usage [15, 16]. However studies from low-middle income countries still show 4%-69% of injured drivers having alcohol in their blood ; although alcohol use is not well documented from the developing world . A significant proportion of commercial drivers use stimulants to keep awake and relieve fatigue during their long work schedules. This usage is also associated with increased risk for crashes in this population [14, 19–21].
Pakistan, a low income country, has the fifth highest annual number of road traffic injury related deaths (40,000) in the world . Commercial drivers contribute to 60% of this burden . Although laws against driving while intoxicated (DWI) do exist in Pakistan  and use of alcohol is completely prohibited for all drivers, the effectiveness of these laws in controlling the problem is questionable [2, 22]. As an Islamic state, the sale and use of alcohol and marijuana is banned for the general public, and they are not considered potential contributors to road traffic crashes [2, 23, 24]. But with changing patterns of alcohol usage , with the labor class having the highest prevalence of alcohol use , and with marijuana being a common illicit drug of abuse here , Pakistani commercial drivers may not be immune to this driving hazard. This study was designed to assess the magnitude of alcohol and marijuana usage by commercial drivers on Pakistani roads.
We conducted a cross sectional survey in October 2008 at the Pir Wadhai Bus/Truck station, Rawalpindi, which is a major segregation site of commercial drivers and vehicles in Pakistan. The study site lies on the major route of goods and passenger transport (Karachi to Khyber), with drivers driving across Pakistan stopping here for loading or offloading goods for transportation to other cities/provinces, or for passenger transport. Subjects included in the study were those individuals who either transported goods in heavy vehicles (trucks), or drove vehicles carrying more than 15 passengers across the country. All drivers driving a commercial vehicle, part time or full time, and who drove more than 160 km daily were eligible to be included in the study. Drivers driving on intra city routes and those who had a language barrier problem were excluded.
A structured questionnaire was designed and translated into Urdu, the local language, and self reported information was collected, through interviews. We developed the questionnaire with the help of a panel of experts on road traffic injuries in Pakistan. The questions were then discussed with a group of professional drivers following which pre-testing was done on 90 commercial drivers (10% of the sample size) by data collectors under the supervision of the principal investigator. Some questions had to be rephrased and the sequence of questions was reorganized based on the feedback from the discussion and pre-testing. We decided to ask the questions on personal marijuana or alcohol use at the end of the interview in order to minimize non-response. Interviews were done privately where participants could not be overheard and they were assured of confidentiality of the divulged information. Drivers were asked if they used alcohol or marijuana, while driving, and if yes, then how frequently. Their responses were categorized, ranging from "always" to "never". The drivers' perceptions about risks associated with substance abuse and driving were also assessed. They were asked about their opinions on why commercial drivers resort to alcohol and marijuana use while they drive (1. "Why do you think commercial drivers drink alcohol while driving?; 2. Why do you think commercial drivers use marijuana while driving?"). These opinions were recorded as open responses, in the drivers' own words, and were later on coded at the time of editing. This information was taken prior to asking about personal substance abuse and was collected from all drivers. In addition to alcohol and marijuana use, they were asked about stimulant pill usage and frequency while driving. Also, basic socio demographic information such on age, sex, ethnicity, education, income and marital status was collected from the drivers.
Time location cluster sampling  was used as the sampling technique. A cluster was defined as a "stand" at which vehicles were parked for transport of goods or passengers at any one of the three 8 hr sampling time intervals. In all, 59 physical sites (stands) were present at the bus station, which were converted to a total of 177 time location clusters. We randomly selected 78 clusters and recruited the study participants from each one of these. Sampling was done at three eight hour time intervals during the day so as to get a representative sample of drivers driving at different times of the day. Finally, eleven subjects were recruited from each cluster after obtaining informed consent.
During our literature review, we did not come up with any estimates for the proportion of commercial or general drivers using alcohol or marijuana while driving for Pakistan. Thus we calculated the sample size required for the study using a proportion of 0.5 which gives the maximum sample size for estimation of any prevalence. Using a 95% confidence level, a bound on error of 0.05 and a design effect of 2, the minimum required sample size for the study objectives was 769. We inflated the required sample size by 10% to cater for the non response expected in the study. The final sample size required was of 846 subjects and 857 subjects were recruited for the study.
The probability of selection of the subjects in the different clusters was not proportional to size and a fixed number of individuals were taken from each cluster, 11, in order to achieve the required sample size. We performed weighted analysis to overcome this issue. Weights were calculated based on the size of the cluster, assessed by the average number of vehicles parked at that cluster. Basic descriptive statistics were calculated for estimation of prevalence of the different characteristics in these commercial drivers. Estimates were calculated for the overall population, and separately for truckers and passenger vehicle drivers. Differences in the estimates of the two groups were assessed by using student's t test, chi square test, and fisher-exact test where appropriate. Logistic regression was used to calculate the unadjusted ORs for association with having a history of a crash in the last five years. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17 with the complex sample analysis module.
Ethical approval was obtained for the study from the Ethics Review Committee of the Aga Khan University, Karachi.
A sample of 857 commercial drivers was interviewed with a total response rate of 81%. All the individuals included in the sample were male, no female was found in this profession. There were two major categories of drivers, those driving load carrying vehicles and those involved in the transport of passengers. Age ranged from 18 yrs to 68 yrs and the mean age for all drivers was found to be 38.3 (95% CI 37.6-38.9). Most of these drivers belonged to the Punjabi ethnicity (45%). The mean of number of completed school years was 5.2 (95% CI 4.9-5.4) in the total but was 4.6 (95% CI 4.4-4.9) in the truckers compared to 5.8 (95% CI 5.5-6.1) in the passenger vehicle drivers, which is significantly higher
Prevalence of substance abuse while driving among commercial drivers
Use of stimulant pill to remain awake while driving n(%)
Use of marijuana while driving
Use of alcohol while driving
66 (7.7 ± 1.8)
196 (22.8 ± 2.8)
54 (6.3 ± 1.6)
Prevalence of alcohol and marijuana use among commercial drivers (sub categories) of Pakistan
(N = 857)
Alcohol users (n = 54)
(n(%, 95% CI))
Marijuana Users (n = 196)
(n (%, 95%CI))
Alcohol & Marijuana (n = 39)
(n (%, 95%CI))
Type of respondent
46 (9.9, 6.8-14.1)
137 (29.9, 24.9-35.4)
35 (7.7, 5-11.8)
Passenger Vehicle Drivers
8 (1.9, 1.2-3.2)
59 (14.7, 10.9-19.5)
4 (0.9, 0.5-1.8)
9 (4.3, 2.5-7.5)
47 (21.7, 16.9-27.3)
8 (3.7, 2-6.9)
16 (5.3, 3.4-8.3)
76 (25.1, 20.3-30.5)
12 (4.1, 2.4-7.1)
17 (6.8, 4.6-9.8)
51 (21.8, 17.4-26.9)
8 (3.5, 1.9-6.5)
12 (11.3, 6.2-19.7)
22 (21.4, 15.5-28.7)
11 (10.1, 5.8-17.1)
15 (3.5, 2.3-5.3)
65 (17, 13.6-21)
8 (2, 1.1-3.5)
9 (15.1, 8.6-25.3)
32 (51.8, 41.8-61.7)
9 (15.1, 8.6-25.3)
20 (8.2, 4.9-13.6)
51 (21.1, 16.4-26.7)
16 (6.6, 3.4-12.2)
5 (5.2, 1.6-8.7)
33 (31.8, 24.1-43.2)
3 (3.1, 1.3-7.4)
5 (7.8, 0.7-9.6)
15 (22.7, 15.5-31.8)
3 (4.8, 2.1-10.8)
Education (yrs of schooling)
8 (6.2, 3.1-12.2)
28 (21.7, 15.4-29.7)
5 (3.8, 1.3-10.4)
26 (7.9, 5.1-12.1)
89 (26.7, 21.8-32.2)
23 (6.8, 4.3-10.5)
17 (4.4, 2.8-6.7)
65 (18.2, 14.5-22.5)
9 (2.6, 1.5-4.6)
> 10 yrs
3 (13.2, -0.2-5.1))
4 (19.7, 8.5-39.4))
2 (13.2, 4.5-32.5)
No crash in last five years
42 (5.5, 4-7.4)
168 (22, 18.5-25.9)
31 (4.1, 2.8-6)
Crash in last five years
12 (12.2, 6.8- 21)
28 (30.1, 23.4-37.7)
8 (8.8, 4.7-15.8)
Income in Pak Rupees (PKR)*
24 (5.6, 3.4-9)
99 (22.8, 18.4-27.8)
19 (4.3, 2.4-7.7)
28 (7.6, 5.5-10.4)
82 (22.6, 18.3-27.5)
19 (5.3, 3.6-7.9)
2 (6.3, 0.4-9.4)
15 (25, 15.3-38)
1 (2.1, 0.4-9.4)
Marijuana usage rate was almost 23% for the driver sample (Table 1). Again this was significantly higher in truckers (30%) compared to bus drivers (14.7%) (Table 2). No significant difference in usage was seen between the different age groups in using marijuana while driving. Sindhis had the highest usage rate (52%) but the second highest usage was in Kashmiris (32%). Education did have an effect on marijuana use with the lesser educated drivers showing higher rates of marijuana usage. Marijuana was used by 30% of the drivers involved in a road crash in the last five years compared to 22% in those without a history of crashes. Alcohol and marijuana were used in conjunction by 4.6% of the sample. Drivers who drove trucks, had Sindhi ethnicity, had more than 10 yrs of education or were over 50 yrs old had the highest conjunction usage rates in the sample. Almost 8% of the drivers also reported using stimulant pills while driving on the road.
Responses of drivers when asked about Alcohol and Marijuana use among commercial drivers
Percentage of Responses
Reasons for Marijuana use
1. To get peace and calm
2. Drivers feel sleepy without it
4. Relieves fatigue
5. Like to smoke marijuana
6. Difficult to drive on long routes without it
Get pleasure while driving
7. Irresponsible behavior
8. Did not respond
9. Do not know
Reasons for Alcohol use
1. Relieves fatigue
2. Just like to drink it
3. Irresponsible behavior
4. Drivers do not drink alcohol
5. Mental peace and calm
6. Feel relaxed and driving is easier
7. To be able to drive the vehicle faster
8. To stay awake while driving
9. Do not know
Association of alcohol and marijuana use with different driver characteristics (regression analysis)
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Unadjusted OR (95% CI)
Type of respondent
Stressed while driving
Fight on the road
Racing with other vehicles
Speed miscalculation while overtaking
Our results show that DWI, marijuana along with stimulant pill use is a major issue in the commercial driver population of Pakistan. Currently, owing to the fact that sale and use of alcohol is illegal in the Muslim dominant Pakistani population, alcohol use while driving is not considered a major risk factor for road traffic injuries. This common belief is contradictory to our study findings which show up to 10% of truck drivers involved in alcohol use while driving. Our estimates are based on self reports, and as the practice of alcohol use is illegal and frowned upon in general society, we can safely assume that our findings are underestimated and the actual problem is of a greater magnitude. Our results show higher use of alcohol and marijuana in truck drivers compared to bus drivers. A possible explanation for this could be the conditions in which these two different groups drive. Bus drivers transport passengers in their vehicles resulting in there being less of a chance for the driver to engage in such activities without being reprimanded by the passengers.
Prevalence of DWI and marijuana use among commercial drivers is high in Pakistan compared to other countries. Studies on commercial drivers also show lower estimates compared to our study (0.5%-4.9%) [20, 29]. This difference may be due to lapses in the enforcement of drug and alcohol use laws by the Pakistani highway police. Some western studies also show high prevalence of substance abuse but these findings are likely to be over-estimated as they have been done in drivers suspected and then checked for substance abuse by the traffic police [30, 31].
The drivers' opinions on why alcohol and marijuana is used indicate a lack of awareness of the hazards associated with this practice. Most drivers believed that substance abuse relieves fatigue, makes the journey easier, and even prevents sleepiness, although sleep debt accumulates and cannot be relieved without normal restorative sleep . This presents us with an avenue for intervention to reduce substance abuse in this population. Awareness campaigns for behaviour modification are known to be effective, especially when coupled with promotion of alternative behaviours . The success of these campaign has been greater when they are combined with proper enforcement of stringent laws on drunk driving and substance abuse, and improved awareness of these laws and consequences of violations [33, 34].
Laws against DWI are ineffective in the country owing to the lack of use of methods such as random breath analyzer tests and blood tests on drivers suspected of DWI . Evidence of reduced fitness to drive as a consequence of drug consumption is essential for proper law enforcement . Pakistan still does not have a law specifying the allowable blood alcohol concentration of drivers on the road. Designating a BAC level, random checks and breathalyzer tests on these drivers on the road, combined with appropriate awareness campaigns may prove to be effective to resolve this dilemma [17, 33]. It is also important to note that regulations need to be enforced not just on the roads but also in the commercial transport organizations which hire the drivers to transport goods or passengers. Regular checks of drug and alcohol should be carried out in all drivers working for such companies for continued employment and the results should be available to law enforcement authorities.
Our results show significant variations in substance abuse among drivers of different ethnicities and socioeconomic strata. These findings indicate psychosocial elements influencing the use of drugs and alcohol in this population which were not explored in our study. Further investigations looking into this aspect may clarify the relationships between social, cultural and psychological risk factors for DWI and provide critical information for targeted and appropriate interventions.
The commercial drivers of large vehicles are a mobile population, spending most of their time on the road and stopping at segregation points from time to time. Our study was done at one of the biggest bus/truck stations in the country, lying on the Karachi-khyber route which runs across the country. The drivers stopping at this point are representative of the Pakistani large vehicle commercial driver population. Furthermore, we used time location cluster sampling, a type of probability sampling for mobile populations, minimizing any selection bias in our results. Our study included general commercial drivers of large vehicles driving on highways, giving us the prevalence estimates for this population and not only of those involved in crashes. This information is not frequently seen in the scientific literature. A limitation of the study is that we did not assess blood alcohol levels and instead resorted to self reporting of the practice by the drivers. There is a high level of agreement between reported and observed information on crashes and RTIS  seen but reported information on illegal or socially unaccepted activities such as substance abuse while driving is generally under-reported [37–39]. Considering our objectives and the fact that alcohol use is illegal by law, and disliked in the Muslim dominant Pakistanis society, we believe that self reported alcohol use while driving is a reasonable indicator for the presence of DWI and marijuana use in this population. It can be inferred that the actual problem may be greater than what our study recorded.
The first step in controlling this situation is recognizing that the problem actually exists. We need to be open about the fact that, despite laws banning alcohol consumption in Pakistan, it is still being used by the driver population of the country. Once this hurdle is crossed, we need to implement more focused and effective interventions controlling alcohol use while driving, along with studies objectively measuring their effect.
The study was supported by funds through the Junior Researcher Scholarship from the Road Traffic Injury Research Network (RTIRN).
- Peden M: World report on road traffic injury prevention. 2004, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for action. 2009, World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- Drummer O: Briefing notes provided to standing committee on family and community affairs inquiry into substance abuse in Australian communitie. 2002, Canberra: Commonwealth of AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Drummer O: Drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic accidents: the use of responsibility analysis to investigate the contribution of drugs to fatal accidents (report no. 0594. 1994, Clayton: Victorian Institute of Forensic Pathology, Monash UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Borkenstein RF: The Role of the Drinking Driver in Traffic Accidents: The Grand Rapids Study. 1974, Steintor-VerlagGoogle Scholar
- Blomberg RD, Peck RC, Moskowitz H, Burns M, Fiorentino D: The Long Beach/Fort Lauderdale relative risk study. J Saf Res. 2009, 40 (4): 285-292. 10.1016/j.jsr.2009.07.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Drugs and driving in Australia (AP-R172/00). 2000, Sydney: AustroadsGoogle Scholar
- Literature review on the relation between drug use, impaired driving and traffic accidents (CT.97.EP.14). 1999, Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug AddictionGoogle Scholar
- Ogden EJD, Moskowitz H: Effects of alcohol and other drugs on driver performance. Traffic Inj Prev. 2004, 5 (3): 185-198. 10.1080/15389580490465201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bacs V: Driver characteristics and impairment at various BACs. 2000Google Scholar
- Drummer O: The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in australian road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2004, 36 (2): 239-248. 10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00153-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chisholm D, Naci H: Road traffic injury prevention: an assessment of risk exposure and intervention cost-effectiveness in different world regions. 2008, Health Systems Financing Discussion Paper WHO, Geneva, [http://wwwwhoint/choice/publications/d_2009_road_trafficpdf]Google Scholar
- Part 1: Alcohol, drugs, ageing and fatigue. [http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roadsafety/research/newsletters/coll_roadsafetypart1alcoholdrugs/safetydivisionpart1alcoh4706.pdf]
- Lund AK, Preusser DF, Blomberg RD, Williams AF: Drug use by tractor-trailer drivers. J Forensic Sci. 1988, 33 (3): 648-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cunradi CB, Ragland DR, Greiner B, Klein M, Fisher JM: Attributable risk of alcohol and other drugs for crashes in the transit industry. Inj Prev. 2005, 11 (6): 378-10.1136/ip.2004.007476.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Robb G, Sultana S, Ameratunga S, Jackson R: A systematic review of epidemiological studies investigating risk factors for work-related road traffic crashes and injuries. Inj Prev. 2008, 14 (1): 51-10.1136/ip.2007.016766.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- WHO: Drinking and Driving: a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. 2007, Global Road Safety Partnership GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Hazen A, Ehiri JE: Road traffic injuries: hidden epidemic in less developed countries. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006, 98 (1): 73-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Davey JD, Richards NL: Illicit drug use and driving by Australian long haul truck drivers: Reform starts with rehabilitation. 2004Google Scholar
- Couper FJ, Pemberton M, Jarvis A, Hughes M, Logan BK: Prevalence of drug use in commercial tractor-trailer drivers. J Forensic Sci. 2002, 47 (3): 562-567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Labat L, Fontaine B, Delzenne C, Doublet A, Marek MC, Tellier D, Tonneau M, Lhermitte M, Frimat P: Prevalence of psychoactive substances in truck drivers in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region (France). Forensic Sci Int. 2008, 174 (2-3): 90-94. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Batool Z, Carsten O, Jopson A: Road safety issues in Pakistan: a case study of Lahore. Transport Plann Tech. 2012, 35 (1): 31-48. 10.1080/03081060.2012.635415.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kobusingye O, Hyder A, Ali N: Exploring the perceived causes of road traffic crashes in Uganda and Pakistan: a pilot study: short research report. Afr Saf Promot. 2006, 4 (3): 69-76.Google Scholar
- Anthony JC: Harmful alcohol consumption: World epidemiological data.Google Scholar
- WHO: Global Status Report on Alcohol World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse. 2004, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Haider W, Chaudhry MA: Prevalence of alcoholism in the Punjab, Pakistan. Biomedica. 2008, 24:Google Scholar
- National Drug Abuse Assessment Study of Pakistan. 2000Google Scholar
- Magnani R, Sabin K, Saidel T, Heckathorn D: Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS. 2005, 19 (suppl 2): S67-S72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ingsathit A, Woratanarat P, Anukarahanonta T, Rattanasiri S, Chatchaipun P, Wattayakorn K, Lim S, Suriyawongpaisal P: Prevalence of psychoactive drug use among drivers in Thailand: A roadside survey. Accid Anal Prev. 2009, 41 (3): 474-478. 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Appenzeller BMR, Schneider S, Yegles M, Maul A, Wennig R: Drugs and chronic alcohol abuse in drivers. Forensic Sci Int. 2005, 155 (2-3): 83-90. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.07.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drummer OH, Gerostamoulos D, Chu M, Swann P, Boorman M, Cairns I: Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers. Forensic Sci Int. 2007, 170 (2-3): 105-110. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lyznicki JM, Doege TC, Davis RM, Williams MA: Sleepiness, driving, and motor vehicle crashes. JAMA. 1998, 279 (23): 1908-10.1001/jama.279.23.1908.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeJong W, Hingson R: Strategies to reduce driving under the influence of alcohol. Annu Rev Publ Health. 1998, 19 (1): 359-378. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hingson R, McGovern T, Howland J, Heeren T, Winter M, Zakocs R: Reducing alcohol-impaired driving in Massachusetts: the Saving Lives Program. Am J Public Health. 1996, 86 (6): 791-10.2105/AJPH.86.6.791.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moran R, Crowley J, Courtney R: Literature review on the relation between drug use, impaired driving and traffic accidents. 1999Google Scholar
- Begg DJ, Langley JD, Williams SM: Validity of self reported crashes and injuries in a longitudinal study of young adults. Inj Prev. 1999, 5 (2): 142-10.1136/ip.5.2.142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Locander W, Sudman S, Bradburn N: An investigation of interview method, threat and response distortion. J Am Stat Assoc. 1976, 71 (354): 269-275. 10.2307/2285297.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clark JP, Tifft LL: Polygraph and interview validation of self-reported deviant behavior. Am Sociol Rev. 1966, 31 (4): 516-523. 10.2307/2090775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lajunen T, Summala H: Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transport Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2003, 6 (2): 97-107. 10.1016/S1369-8478(03)00008-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/145/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.