Skip to main content

Protocol of the baseline assessment for the Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) Wales cohort study



Health is a result of influences operating at multiple levels. For example, inadequate housing, poor educational attainment, and reduced access to health care are clustered together, and are all associated with reduced health. Policies which try to change individual people's behaviour have limited effect when people have little control over their environment. However, structural environmental change and an understanding of the way that influences interact with each other, has the potential to facilitate healthy choices irrespective of personal resources. The aim of Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) is to investigate the impact of gestational and postnatal environments on health, and to examine where structural change can be brought about to optimise health outcomes. The baseline assessment will focus on birth outcomes and maternal and infant health.


EHL is a longitudinal birth cohort study. We aim to recruit 1000 pregnant women in the period April 2010 to March 2013. We will examine the impact of the gestational environment (maternal health) and the postnatal environment (housing and neighbourhood conditions) on subsequent health outcomes for the infants born to these women. Data collection will commence during the participants' pregnancy, from approximately 20 weeks gestation. Participants will complete a questionnaire, undergo anthropometric measurements, wear an accelerometer, compile a food diary, and have environmental measures taken within their home. They will also be asked to consent to having a sample of umbilical cord blood taken following delivery of their baby. These data will be complemented by routinely collected electronic data such as health records from GP surgeries, hospital admissions, and child health and development records. Thereafter, participants will be visited annually for follow-up of subsequent exposures and child health outcomes.


The baseline assessment of EHL will provide information concerning the impact of gestational and postnatal environments on birth outcomes and maternal and infant health. The findings can be used to inform the development of complex interventions targeted at structural, environmental factors, intended to reduce ill-health. Long-term follow-up of the cohort will focus on relationships between environmental exposures and the later development of adverse health outcomes, including obesity and diabetes.

Peer Review reports


Health is the result of many interacting factors [13]. Foetal life and early infancy are important periods of susceptibility to environmental hazards, and exposures during early development can predispose the individual to disease such as diabetes, allergy, and asthma [48]. The foetus is susceptible to both historic and gestational maternal exposures via the placenta [8], such as maternal smoking and alcohol consumption. Adverse gestational environments have been associated with a number of sub-optimal birth outcomes, including decrements of foetal growth, early neurodevelopment, and respiratory health [9]. These health outcomes are postulated to result from 'foetal programming', whereby a stimulus or exposure at a critical, sensitive period of early life leads to permanent effects on individual structure, physiology, and metabolism [10]. Environmental exposures are equally significant in the early postnatal period. Because of the immature function of many of the organs, young infants have reduced elimination capacities, which means that they are less able than older individuals to excrete toxicants [11], making them more vulnerable to environmental insults.

Exposures during both the gestational and early postnatal period are identified as potential causes of chronic disease and other disorders in later childhood and in adulthood [1215], or as potentially affecting birth outcomes [16]. However, while a growing number of studies are linking adverse health outcomes to a combination of gestational and postnatal environmental exposures, their focus tends to be on one type of exposure only, for example from passive smoking [17, 18] or lead [19, 20]. The tendency for many environmental epidemiological investigations to focus on single source characteristics, and the scarcity of data on exposure levels of multiple sources, is noted elsewhere [21]. The current evidence base therefore lacks a clear understanding of how multiple different types of exposures might act in concert to influence infant health.

Recommendations from studies which identify individual-level risk factors isolated from the environment in which they are situated can only be used by people who have the personal, social and economic resources to control their environment in such a way as to enable them to adopt the desirable health behaviours. This could widen social inequalities in health outcomes, with greater uptake of protective health behaviours (such as smoking cessation) observed in higher socioeconomic groups [22]. Evidence of this is borne out in individually targeted health promotion efforts which, while demonstrating efficacy in randomised trials, have limited population reach, especially with regard to disadvantaged groups [23]. Improvements in the health of populations (and reductions in the health differential within populations) can only occur when social and environmental structures facilitate healthy choices and behaviours in all sub-populations irrespective of personal resources.



EHL aims to take a multi-level analytical approach to the interaction of housing, neighbourhood, and parental/intrauterine environments with health outcomes, with a focus on both pre- and postnatal environments. Multiple health outcomes will be investigated, including but not limited to: intrauterine/postnatal growth and development, wheeze/asthma, allergies, diabetes, obesity, and unintentional injuries.

Study design

EHL is a prospective, prenatally-recruited birth cohort study. It is designed to complement other epidemiology cohort studies around the world, e.g. [24, 25], in order to validate and support their findings, and to increase statistical power whilst allowing for variation in context and exposure. In terms of its design, EHL has many similarities with other prenatally-recruited birth cohort studies, including the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), the Generation R study, the Danish National Birth Cohort study, and the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) [2629]. These similarities also extend to its collection of umbilical cord blood, which will provide an important resource for immediate and future epidemiological studies. However, due to issues of feasibility, we will not collect biological samples from mothers during pregnancy or DNA from the offspring, as has been done elsewhere (e.g. [30]). Finally, and in agreement with other birth cohort studies (e.g. [26, 27]), we plan to develop a randomly-selected 'focus cohort' with which we can pursue more time-consuming data collection methods, including parental interviews and other air quality sampling techniques such as dust sampling. Related to this, formal collaboration with other birth cohort studies is currently a high priority.

Despite its similarities in design, EHL also departs from other birth cohort studies in some important respects. Our study focuses on research gaps which were identified at the two-day workshop held at the Wellcome Trust in 2008 to improve the research potential of existing longitudinal data. These gaps include objective, measured data as opposed to subjective data (e.g. accelerometer records of physical activity as opposed to questionnaire assessment), and measurements in pregnancy as opposed to postnatal baseline measures. Related to this, a major strength of this study is its use of home visits with study participants. These visits occur during the participant's pregnancy and enable objective measurements to be taken of the housing, neighbourhood, and parental/intrauterine environments. In this way, exposure information is collected by the researcher(s) in person, rather than by more remote methods such as telephone interviews as has been done in the Danish National Birth Cohort study [28]. As all home visits will occur during the gestational period, no mothers will be recruited to the study after the birth of their baby, which contrasts with the Generation R study [27]. Further, participants will not be requested to attend dedicated research centres for the purposes of the study, as they are elsewhere [27], thereby reducing the participant burden which may bias recruitment in birth cohort studies and risk substantial loss to follow-up [31]. In addition, this study responds to a recent call for new birth cohorts to involve fathers as a traditionally hard-to-reach, low-responding group in order to provide a fuller understanding of life-course epidemiology and the intergenerational transfer of health risk [32].

The focus will be on doctor-diagnoses of health outcomes (which will be uploaded and anonymously linked at the individual level in the SAIL databank) rather than parental report. Doctor diagnoses were selected as the optimum measure of outcomes because, and despite other findings to the contrary (e.g. [33, 34]), parental report of symptoms has been shown to be sometimes inaccurate [35, 36] and influenced by symptom understanding, perception, and underestimation [3739], and the duration of recall and the seriousness of the health event being recalled [40]. This potential inaccuracy of parental report may in turn limit researchers' investigations of socio-demographic and ethnic variations in prevalence [37], and so will be avoided in this study.

Finally, this study is unique in collecting and linking electronically-held, person-based, routinely collected data for all participants. We have developed the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, which links together a wide range of anonymised, person-based data from health and social care datasets, whilst complying with the requirements of data protection legislation and confidentiality guidelines [41]. This databank will enable us to conduct remote longitudinal follow-up of participants, thereby minimising sample attrition.


Eligible participants will be pregnant women who: are aged 16 years or older, are resident in Wales, and are receiving their antenatal care within the Abertawe Bro Morgannwg (ABM) University NHS Trust. The ABM maternity service covers a large catchment area which includes women resident in Swansea, and parts of Neath Port Talbot, Powys, and Carmarthenshire. Women are provided with a study leaflet when they attend hospital for routine ultrasound scans or phlebotomoy. In addition, researchers will conduct face-to-face recruitment of women attending for routine ultrasound scans and/or blood tests in ABM maternity hospitals, and community midwives will provide study information to expectant mothers when they attend for antenatal appointments at GP practices. All researchers involved in recruitment will be familiar with a 'recruitment protocol', designed in order to give recruiters consistent and thorough information related to the study. Community midwives will only be expected to provide a brief overview of the aims of the study and a study leaflet which will contain the contact details of researchers involved in the study.

EHL is currently in its pilot phase to determine the efficiency of its recruitment and data collection processes. To date, and after the first five months of recruitment efforts, 137 women have expressed their interest to participate in EHL. Home visits are already underway with a good geographic spread and cross-section of the Swansea community in terms of household income, employment and housing conditions. No results from this pilot study are currently available.

Sample size and geography

1000 families (mothers and babies) will be recruited to the study over the period April 2010 to March 2013. This sample size is comparable to the Environments for Healthy Living study conducted in Queensland, Australia [24]. Having the sample concentrated in one geographical area (in and around Swansea) is anticipated to assist the face-to-face recruitment of participants (either by researchers or local midwives) and the collection and storage of umbilical cord blood samples.

Swansea is located in south Wales, and is Wales' second largest city. Latest figures show that Swansea has a population of 229,100 and an annual birth rate of 2,700 [42]. Swansea's population is growing year-on-year, largely driven by inward migration from outside the UK [42, 43]. Swansea has a mixture of different social backgrounds, housing types, and urban and rural areas. Currently, Swansea has the third largest black and ethnic minority population in Wales [44], and is ranked fifth highest amongst local authority areas in Wales for child poverty (the proportion of children in household with income poverty) [45]. The latest Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation (2008) shows that Swansea has the single most income deprived (Castle 2) and single least income deprived (Killay North) areas in Wales [46]. Similarly, in terms of employment, Swansea has the second most deprived (Castle 2) and the least deprived (Killay North) areas in Wales [47]. This diversity of the population of Swansea will enable researchers to investigate area and locality effects and the spatial distribution of services, amenities and greenspace, and to conduct geographical mapping of incidence.

In terms of its size, EHL is smaller than other birth cohort studies. However, the EHL cohort recruited within Swansea will be linked and embedded within the longitudinal, total-population Wales Electronic Cohort for Children (WECC) of 35,000 births per year in Wales. WECC is an entirely electronic, anonymised child health prospective and retrospective cohort covering the entire Wales population, and is based upon routine electronic records. This type of e-cohort will be able to answer questions where exposures, outcomes and potential confounders are routinely collected or available through individual or ecological linkages.

Data Collection Techniques

After providing their consent to be involved in the study, participants will be contacted by researchers in order to arrange a convenient date and time for a home visit. The home visit will occur at any time during pregnancy. At each home visit, consent will be obtained to collect six main sources of data (see Table 1):

Table 1 Data collection schedule

1. Baseline questionnaire and anthropometric data

The questionnaire will be delivered by a touch-screen laptop computer in the participant's home during the home visit. Questions will include demographics of parents, information about relationships in the family, socio-economics, neighbourhood characteristics, and health, diet and lifestyle. In addition, an experienced anthropometrist will collect measures of upper-arm circumference; skinfold thickness (using Harpenden skinfold calipers) at the subscapular, suprailiac, tricep, and bicep; height (using a portable stadiometer); and weight (using Seca Scales). Anthropometric measurements will be taken from the mother at all times, and from the father when he is available and consenting.

2. Diet and physical activity

Mothers and fathers will be requested to complete a seven-day diet diary, noting all meals (breakfast, lunch, dinner), snacks and drinks consumed each day. This will be recorded using a validated, self-reported seven-day food diary, supplemented by a questionnaire, for dietary assessment [48]. The food diary will be analysed by Health Options Ltd (Health Options Ltd, Cirencester, Gloucester, UK). Average daily kilojoules, percentage total fat, saturated fat, carbohydrate, protein and fibre will be calculated. Objective measurements of maternal physical activity will be achieved using Actigraph accelerometers [49]. Mothers will be requested to wear the accelerometer around the waist for seven continuous days, removing the device only for sleeping, bathing and swimming. The accelerometer will record data relating to the frequency and duration of light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity.

3. Internal environment within the home

Measurements will be taken of noise levels, temperature, relative humidity, and nitrogen dioxide over seven days, beginning at the time of the home visit. A particular focus will be on the parental bedroom, as this is likely to be the place where the baby will sleep and spend several hours each day for at least the first few months of life. Noise levels will be measured in the parental bedroom, using a Bruel and Kjaer 2250 noise meter [50], to enable comparison with the World Health Organization's night noise guidelines for Europe [16]. Temperature and relative humidity will be recorded using Tinytalk II Data Loggers [51], in the parental bedroom and in another room in the home, one with mould or water damage if possible. Nitrogen dioxide will be measured using Palmes-type, passive diffusion tubes [52]. Four will be employed at each home visit: in the parental bedroom, the living room, the kitchen, and immediately outside the home in the vicinity of the front door, away from gas appliances on all occasions. The noise meter, Data Loggers, and diffusion tubes (as well as the diet diaries and accelerometer) will be collected by a researcher seven days after the home visit. In addition, a Home Assessment will be completed by the researcher with assistance from the participant/occupant. Information included in the Home Assessment will cover: the age of the home, and the presence and extent of double glazing, loft and cavity wall insulation, and mould and/or water damage. Observable mould and damp will be scored using a visual inspection of the walls. It was decided that total culturable fungi levels will not be collected (reflecting spores in the air) as more than nine repeated measures are needed for assessment of long term exposures [53]. A further aspect of the Home Assessment is the researcher's visual inspection of the home for hygiene, cleanliness and general presentation. The 'family cleanliness scale', used by social workers in the UK to assess children at risk of neglect, is used for this purpose [54]. Information will be recorded by the researcher(s) immediately after the home visit.

4. External environment around the home

We are developing a system to link anonymised data at household levels to individual data across Wales, which involves the creation of Residential Anonymised Linking Fields (RALFs) [55]. A two-stage approach to measuring metrics from every household by the Health Information Research Unit (HIRU), and anonymisation of households by the NHS information organisation Health Solutions Wales (HSW), will allow environmental and health data to be combined from multiple sources without breaching confidentiality. Using the anonymised data, HIRU will use RALFs and accessibility metrics obtained from the RALF system to local amenities such as play facilities, shops, greenspace, and connectivity and the area walkability. In addition, noise data from the residences will be compared with locally available 'noise mapping' data in the given neighbourhood, which indicate proximity to three main noise sources, namely roads, rail and industry [56].

5. Routinely collected (anonymised) NHS health data

Longitudinal follow-up of study participants and their children will be through routinely collected, anonymised data. Participants will be asked to consent to researchers having access to their maternity notes following the birth of their baby. These notes will provide data regarding the pregnancy (and previous pregnancies), family health histories, and the health and development of the baby up to age six weeks. Anonymised Linking Fields (ALFs) from the SAIL system will be used to link anonymised participant numbers with routine anonymised datasets from all GP records, hospital records (inpatients, out-patients, emergency departments), public health birth files, the National Community Child Health Database (NCCHD), the National Health Service Administrative Register, and foetal ultrasound scan results. Follow-up data on outcomes for health and unintentional injury in childhood will principally be obtained from the anonymised routine data. This includes data on body mass index, measured at the time of school entry, and available in the NCCHD dataset. In this way, we can link individual, household and neighbourhood data (from EHL) with health data (from SAIL). We will also be able to answer questions where exposures, outcomes, and potential confounders are routinely collected or available through individual or ecological linkages. Ecological linkages will be made when data are not available at an individual level but are at an area level.

6. Umbilical cord blood

Cord blood will be collected by the midwife responsible for the mother and baby at the time of delivery within the ABM hospitals. Approximately 10-12 ml of cord blood will be collected in two labelled vacutainers (one heparinised and one for clotted sample), which will be couriered to Swansea University for processing and storage. Umbilical cord blood will be processed for preparation of (i) mononuclear cells for cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen, and (ii) plasma/serum that will be archived at -80°C. Other than the cord blood, no other biological samples will be collected.

After each home visit, study participants will be assigned an anonymised participant number. Thereafter, all data from the mother, father and infant will be linked to this number.

Data Analysis

A multi-level analytical approach will be used to determine the various extrinsic and intrinsic influences on health and development. Multilevel regression models can be used to quantify the relationships between determinants (individual and group level variables) and outcomes, and in particular, the role of community-based interventions on outcomes in combination with multiple-level and individual risk factors. This approach can overcome common methodological barriers associated with conventional regression analysis in ecological epidemiology, where correlation among individuals sharing the same local environment is not accounted for. Multilevel modelling allows for the examination of variability in outcomes between individuals as well as between higher level units. It can also quantify the extent to which variability in outcomes are explained by variables defined at different levels.

Analysis plan

Some areas of analysis and publications anticipated for the baseline assessment are [see 'Additional file 1']:

  1. 1.

    "Household build and respiratory health: a multilevel modelling approach"

  2. 2.

    "Projected cost effectiveness of structural interventions in the prevention of childhood asthma"

  3. 3.

    "Household cleanliness and impact on allergy and infection"

  4. 4.

    "Impact of exposures to pollutants on immune function at birth (using archived umbilical cord blood samples) and the development of allergies in childhood"

  5. 5.

    "Neighbourhood and noise: impacts on pregnancy and birth outcomes"

  6. 6.

    "Neighbourhood conditions and impact on obesity in pregnancy"

  7. 7.

    "Diet and activity in pregnancy and infant health at twelve months"

  8. 8.

    "The use of routine data to predict pregnancy complications and infant health"

  9. 9.

    "Household and neighbourhood characteristics and their impacts on unintentional injuries"


EHL has ethical approval from the South East Wales Research Ethics Committee (09/WSE02/37).

All data pertaining to the participants will be securely anonymised and encrypted so that individuals cannot be personally identified.


EHL offers a unique methodology to understand how complex interactions between various levels of the epidemiological model contribute to overall health and wellbeing of populations. Data collection methods will be supplemented by routine data (see 'Additional file 2'). It is anticipated that EHL will contribute to current understanding of the associations between health and environmental conditions, and will also extend existing understanding by collecting information on multiple exposures.

The idea that the foetus is vulnerable to maternal exposures is a growing area of research, e.g. [10, 12, 14, 15, 57], to which EHL will contribute. It is linked with the research evidence that suggests that the characteristics of the gestational environment can 'program' developmental changes in the foetus, and that they persist after birth as postnatal traits [58] and into adulthood [59]. The research base for the contribution of postnatal environmental exposures to infant health is extensive, e.g. [6062], but it lacks a clear understanding of how multiple exposures can affect susceptibility to ill-health and unintentional injury. EHL will investigate multiple gestational and postnatal exposures among a cohort of infants born to 1000 families in an area of South Wales covered by ABM NHS Trust.

Infant experience is argued to be an important determinant of later health due to the continued malleability of biological systems at this stage of development [63]. To this extent, addressing chronic illness in children and adults is likely to require interventions that reduce the adverse impact of social disadvantage in early childhood. While it is not possible to change all of the determinants of health, such as genetic predisposition, many environmental exposures are modifiable and preventable. Examples include the design of neighbourhoods and the quality of housing. Nevertheless, such exposures are often beyond an individual's control [64]. Understanding how to bring about structural, environmental change for the benefit of public health is an important challenge. It is particularly important given a growing body of evidence which points toward the limitations of individually targeted behavioural change interventions, in terms of population reach and lack of individual resources [23, 65].

In response to calls to consider health within its social context [66], EHL will pay full attention to how health outcomes might be socially determined. It will examine how adverse social conditions, such as low income and living in deprived neighbourhoods, can have implications in terms of infant health. Its findings will contribute to a burgeoning literature on the life course approach in epidemiology, e.g. [67], by elucidating the impact of exposures during gestation and early post-partum on infant health. EHL will provide an evidence base to inform policy makers and practitioners of environmental exposures acting before birth and, after birth, inside and outside the home, and their impact on health outcomes. It will also assist these personnel in targeting publicly-funded environmental interventions to address public health in the future. We anticipate that the study findings will set a rationale for preventive interventions that focus on modifiable, structural factors in the built environment, and that demonstrate an appreciation of the social circumstances that can limit choice, thereby facilitating healthy behaviours and choices in all sub-populations.

One novel aspect of this study is the inclusion of geographical data to allow for spatial analysis of the effects of neighbourhood physical characteristics on lifestyle choices, physical activity, obesity, and injury prevention. The planned multi-level analysis is an innovative element that sets this study apart from the traditional risk-outcome analyses that characterise epidemiological cohort studies. Thus, a further contribution of EHL will be toward methodological developments in the discipline of epidemiology.



Abertawe Bro Morgannwg


Anonymous Linking Field


Environments for Healthy Living


Health Informatics Research Unit


Medical Research Council


Residential Anonymous Linking Field


Secure Anonymised Information Linkage


Wales Electronic Cohort for Children


  1. Yaari E, Susser Z, Lahad A, Nesher Y, Kachalsky S, Tal A, Kerem E: Genetic-environmental interactions in asthma and allergy: a study in a closed population exposed to different environments. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009, 102: 233-237. 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60086-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gohlke JM, Thomas R, Zhang Y, Rosenstein MC, Davis AP, Murphy C, Becker KG, Mattingly CJ, Portier CJ: Genetic and environmental pathways to complex diseases. BMC Syst Biol. 2009, 3: 46-10.1186/1752-0509-3-46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shostak S: Locating gene-environment interaction: at the intersections of genetics and public health. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 2327-2342. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00231-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffjan S, Nicolae D, Ostrovnaya I, Roberg K, Evans M, Mirel DB, Steiner L, Walker K, Shult P, Gangnon RE, et al: Gene-environment interaction effects on the development of immune responses in the 1st year of life. Am J Hum Genet. 2005, 76: 696-704. 10.1086/429418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vercelli D: Gene-environment interactions: the road less traveled by in asthma genetics. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009, 123: 26-27. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.11.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bisgaard H, Simpson A, Palmer CN, Bonnelykke K, McLean I, Mukhopadhyay S, Pipper CB, Halkjaer LB, Lipworth B, Hankinson J, et al: Gene-environment interaction in the onset of eczema in infancy: filaggrin loss-of-function mutations enhanced by neonatal cat exposure. PLoS Med. 2008, 5: e131-10.1371/journal.pmed.0050131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bougneres P, Valleron AJ: Causes of early-onset type 1 diabetes: toward data-driven environmental approaches. J Exp Med. 2008, 205: 2953-2957. 10.1084/jem.20082622.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bearer CF: Environmental health hazards: how children are different from adults. Future Child. 1995, 5: 11-26. 10.2307/1602354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perera FP, Rauh V, Whyatt RM, Tang D, Tsai WY, Bernert JT, Tu YH, Andrews H, Barr DB, Camann DE, et al: A summary of recent findings on birth outcomes and developmental effects of prenatal ETS, PAH, and pesticide exposures. Neurotoxicology. 2005, 26: 573-587. 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.07.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Godfrey KM, Barker DJ: Fetal nutrition and adult disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000, 71: 1344S-1352S.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nielsen E, Ostergaard G, Larsen JC: Toxicological Risk Assessment of Chemicals: A practical guide. 2008, New York; London: Taylor and Francis, Inc

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez-Pinilla F, Vaynman S: A "deficient environment" in prenatal life may compromise systems important for cognitive function by affecting BDNF in the hippocampus. Exp Neurol. 2005, 192: 235-243. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.12.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas C, Hypponen E, Power C: Prenatal exposures and glucose metabolism in adulthood: are effects mediated through birth weight and adiposity?. Diabetes Care. 2007, 30: 918-924. 10.2337/dc06-1881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McKeever TM, Lewis SA, Smith C, Hubbard R: The importance of prenatal exposures on the development of allergic disease: a birth cohort study using the West Midlands General Practice Database. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002, 166: 827-832. 10.1164/rccm.200202-158OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Connor MJ, Paley B: The relationship of prenatal alcohol exposure and the postnatal environment to child depressive symptoms. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006, 31: 50-64. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsj021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization: Night Noise Guidelines for Europe. []

  17. Pattenden S, Antova T, Neuberger M, Nikiforov B, De Sario M, Grize L, Heinrich J, Hruba F, Janssen N, Luttmann-Gibson H, et al: Parental smoking and children's respiratory health: independent effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure. Tobacco Control. 2006, 15: 294-301. 10.1136/tc.2005.015065.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaakkola JJ, Kosheleva AA, Katsnelson BA, Kuzmin SV, Privalova LI, Spengler JD: Prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health in Russian children. Respir Res. 2006, 7: 48-10.1186/1465-9921-7-48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Al-Saleh I, Shinwari N, Nester M, Mashhour A, Moncari L, El Din Mohamed G, Rabah A: Longitudinal study of prenatal and postnatal lead exposure and early cognitive development in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia: a preliminary results of cord blood lead levels. J Trop Pediatr. 2008, 54: 300-307. 10.1093/tropej/fmn019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ronchetti R, Hazel van den P, Schoeters G, Hanke W, Rennezova Z, Barreto M, Villa MP: Lead neurotoxicity in children: is prenatal exposure more important than postnatal exposure?. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006, 95: 45-49. 10.1080/08035320600886224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koppe JG, Bartonova A, Bolte G, Bistrup ML, Busby C, Butter M, Dorfman P, Fucic A, Gee D, Hazel van den P, et al: Exposure to multiple environmental agents and their effect. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006, 95: 106-113. 10.1080/08035320600886646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Langille DB, Curtis L, Hughes J, Murphy GT: Association of socio-economic factors with health risk behaviours among high school students in rural Nova Scotia. Can J Public Health. 2003, 94: 442-447.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Adler NE, Ostrove JM: Socioeconomic status and health: what we know and what we don't. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999, 896: 3-15. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08101.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Environments for Healthy Living; Griffith University, Australia. []

  25. EDEN: Studies to determine pre- and postnatal development and child health. []

  26. Golding J: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)--study design and collaborative opportunities. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004, 151 (Suppl 3): U119-123. 10.1530/eje.0.151U119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaddoe VW, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Verhulst FC, Witteman JC, Hofman A: The Generation R Study: Design and cohort profile. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006, 21: 475-484. 10.1007/s10654-006-9022-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Olsen J, Melbye M, Olsen SF, Sorensen TI, Aaby P, Andersen AM, Taxbol D, Hansen KD, Juhl M, Schow TB, et al: The Danish National Birth Cohort--its background, structure and aim. Scand J Public Health. 2001, 29: 300-307. 10.1177/14034948010290040201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magnus P, Irgens LM, Haug K, Nystad W, Skjaerven R, Stoltenberg C: Cohort profile: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa). Int J Epidemiol. 2006, 35: 1146-1150. 10.1093/ije/dyl170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jaddoe VW, Bakker R, van Duijn CM, Heijden van der AJ, Lindemans J, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Uitterlinden AG, et al: The Generation R Study Biobank: a resource for epidemiological studies in children and their parents. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007, 22: 917-923. 10.1007/s10654-007-9209-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Luo Z-C, Liu J-M, Fraser W: Large prospective birth cohort studies on environmental contaminants and child health - goals, challenges, limitations and needs. Medical Hypotheses. 2010, 74: 318-324. 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.08.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lawlor DA, Andersen AM, Batty GD: Birth cohort studies: past, present and future. Int J Epidemiol. 2009, 38: 897-902. 10.1093/ije/dyp240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Norzila MZ, Haifa AL, Deng CT, Azizi BH: Prevalence of childhood asthma and allergy in an inner city Malaysian community: intra-observer reliability of two translated international questionnaires. Med J Malaysia. 2000, 55: 33-39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vernacchio L, Vezina R, Ozonoff A, MItchell A: Validity of parental reporting of recent episodes of acute otitis media: A Slone Center Office-based Research (SCOR) network study. JABFM. 2007, 160-163. 10.3122/jabfm.2007.02.060125.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dales RE, White J, Bhumgara C, McMullen E: Parental reporting of childrens' coughing is biased. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997, 13: 541-545. 10.1023/A:1007311912777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fritz GK, Overholser JC: Patterns of response to childhood asthma. Psychosom Med. 1989, 51: 347-355.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Michel G, Silverman M, Strippoli MP, Zwahlen M, Brooke AM, Grigg J, Kuehni CE: Parental understanding of wheeze and its impact on asthma prevalence estimates. Eur Respir J. 2006, 28: 1124-1130. 10.1183/09031936.06.00008406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lara M, Duan N, Sherbourne C, Lewis MA, Landon C, Halfon N, Brook RH: Differences between child and parent reports of symptoms among Latino children with asthma. Pediatrics. 1998, 102: E68-10.1542/peds.102.6.e68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sole D, Vanna AT, Yamada E, Rizzo MC, Naspitz CK: International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) written questionnaire: validation of the asthma component among Brazilian children. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1998, 8: 376-382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Daly KA, Lindgren B, Giebink GS: Validity of parental report of a child's medical history in otitis media research. Am J Epidemiol. 1994, 139: 1116-1121.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyons RA, Jones KH, John G, Brooks CJ, Verplancke JP, Ford DV, Brown G, Leake K: The SAIL databank: linking multiple health and social care datasets. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009, 9: 3-10.1186/1472-6947-9-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Swansea Council: 2008 Mid Year Estimates of Population. []

  43. Population Estimates Unit: 2008 mid year estimates of population. []

  44. Children and Young People's Partnerships: A Guide to the Children and Young People's Plan for Swansea, 2008-2011. 2009, ['s_Plan_for_Swansea_2008_2011_(English).pdf]

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kenway P, Parsons N, Carr J, Palmer G: Monitoring Poverty and Social Exclusion in Wales 2005. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, New Policy Initiative. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  46. Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2008; income. []

  47. Welsh Index of Multiple Deprivation 2008; employment. []

  48. Food Standards Agency: McCance and Widdowson's the Composition of Foods. 6th summary edition. 2002, Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  49. Actigraph, 2009. []

  50. Bruel and Kjaer Type 2250. []

  51. Gemini. TinyTalk Ultra 2 Dual Channel Temperature/Relative Humidity Data Loggers, TGU-4500. []

  52. Palmes ED, Gunnison AF: Personal monitoring device for gaseous contaminants. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1973, 34: 78-81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cho SJ, Ramachandran G, Grengs J, Ryan AD, Eberly LE, Adgate JL: Longitudinal evaluation of allergen and culturable fungal concentrations in inner-city households. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008, 5: 107-118. 10.1080/15459620701827049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Davie CE, Hutt SJ, Vincent E, Mason M: The Young Child at Home. 1984, London: Nfer Nelson

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rodgers SE, Lyons RA, Dsilva R, Jones KH, Brooks CJ, Ford DV, John G, Verplancke JP: Residential Anonymous Linking Fields (RALFs): a novel information infrastructure to study the interaction between the environment and individuals' health. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009, 31: 582-588. 10.1093/pubmed/fdp041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Welsh Assembly Government: Noise monitoring and mapping. [;jsessionid=R7zTLmNGTBHB2lssGCwRJQXgnXcmRm4v8LHhBLclMGgXBgGJkfgG!-1129944059?lang=en]

  57. Louey S, Thornburg KL: The prenatal environment and later cardiovascular disease. Early Hum Dev. 2005, 81: 745-751. 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuzawa CW: Fetal origins of developmental plasticity: are fetal cues reliable predictors of future nutritional environments?. Am J Hum Biol. 2005, 17: 5-21. 10.1002/ajhb.20091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lau C, Rogers JM: Embryonic and fetal programming of physiological disorders in adulthood. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2004, 72: 300-312. 10.1002/bdrc.20029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gryczynska D, Kobos J, Zakrzewska A: Relationship between passive smoking, recurrent respiratory tract infections and otitis media in children. International Journal of Pediatric Othorihnolaryngology. 1999, 49 (Suppl 1): S275-278. 10.1016/S0165-5876(99)00178-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schwartz J: Air pollution and children's health. Pediatrics. 2004, 113: 1037-1043.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Smith JR, Brooks-Gunn J, Klebanov P: The consequences of living in poverty for young children's cognitive and verbal ability and early school achievement. The consequences of growing up poor. Edited by: Duncan GJ, Brooks-Gunn J. 1997, New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 132-189.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wilkinson R, Marmot M: Social determinants of health: the solid facts. 2nd edition. 2003, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  64. Cooper K: Child health and the environment. Edited by: Holmes R. 2005, Canadian Partnership for Children's Health and Environment (CPCHE), []

    Google Scholar 

  65. Oleans C: Promoting the maintenance of health behaviour change: recommendations for the next generation of research practice. Health Psychology. 2000, 19 (Suppl 1): S24-28.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Spencer N: Social, economic, and political determinants of child health. Pediatrics. 2003, 112: 704-706.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Ben-Shlomo Y, Kuh D: A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology: conceptual models, empirical challenges and interdisciplinary perspectives. Int J Epidemiol. 2002, 31: 285-293. 10.1093/ije/31.2.285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references


EHL is funded by Swansea University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca A Hill.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

RAL conceived the idea of EHL. RH and SB drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material


Additional file 1: Additional file 1, topic areas of investigation. Anticipated areas of investigation (analysis plan) (DOCX 13 KB)


Additional file 2: Data collection sources with links to routine data. EHL data collection sources and routine data to measure the home and neighbourhood and gestational environments. (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.A., Brophy, S., Brunt, H. et al. Protocol of the baseline assessment for the Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) Wales cohort study. BMC Public Health 10, 150 (2010).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: