Skip to main content
Download PDF

Betting high, feeling low: a cross-sectional examination of gambling severity and psychological distress among Ghanaian youth

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 2032 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the nexus between online gambling and psychological distress among youth, especially in Ghana. This study aimed to investigate the effects of online sports betting on psychological distress, focusing on depression, anxiety, and stress among young individuals in the Volta region of Ghana.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out at various betting centers in the Volta region of Ghana. Four hundred and three (403) participants were selected using a multi-stage sampling method. The study used a standardized questionnaire to assess psychological distress with the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS 21) and problematic gambling with the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI). The analysis included both descriptive and inferential methods. These include the implementation of the bootstrap technique within multiple regression models using the current versions of Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program (JASP) [0.18.2], Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) [29.0.2], and Microsoft Excel (2019).

Results

The study found a prevalence of 40% for problematic gambling and 44% for moderate gambling problems among participants, resulting in an overall gambling prevalence of 84%. Regarding psychological distress, the estimated prevalence of depression among participants was 43.6%, with stress reported at 31.1% and anxiety at 68.8%. The overall prevalence of psychological distress was 48%. When analyzing the link between gambling and psychological distress, the study noted that males were more prone to gambling-related psychological distress than females (β = 2.036, p = 0.025). Furthermore, individuals with problem gambling showed the highest probability of experiencing more significant psychological distress compared to other groups (β = 9.228, p = 0.002), followed by those with moderate gambling levels (β = 3.283, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

We recommend that the mental health unit of the Ghana Health Service, in collaboration with the Gaming Commission of Ghana, should develop youth-friendly interventions to address the prevalence and onset of problematic gambling among the youth, especially males. This could, in turn, reduce the prevalence of psychological distress among youth engaged in online gambling in Ghana.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

In recent years, a growing area of public health concern is online gambling among the youth due to the accessibility and anonymity that online betting platforms provide [1, 2]. While online gambling may not be new to the developed world [3, 4], the phenomenon was rarely practiced on the African continent [5]. However, due to the widespread use of smartphones and the emergence of gambling centers, online gambling has become a social and public health concern in Africa [6, 7]. For instance, research has shown that at least 71% of Zambian youth indulge in online sports betting [8]. Additionally, in Kwara State, Central Nigeria, 58.7% of the youth were found to indulge in online sports betting [9].

Although the growth of the African betting industry has provided an additional revenue stream to governments and filled an unemployment gap, it has also led to a rise in gambling addiction [5]. In Ethiopia for instance, 53.9% of sports bettors aged 25 to 31 years were found to battle with problematic gambling [10]. Similarly, studies in the country revealed that 37% of school adolescents engaged in gambling were at risk of severe problematic gambling, with 7% already classified as problematic or pathological gamblers [11]. In South Africa, 10.8% of a representative urban sample were found to have developed a severe gambling problem [12]. Sharp and colleagues further suggest that while young males face a higher risk for problematic gambling, young females are increasingly getting involved in gambling, including mobile internet-based lotteries and games.

Indulgence in online betting could have a negative impact on the health and well-being of those involved in the practice, their families, and communities at large [13]. Betting can impact an individual’s finances, relationships, employment, and psychological well-being [14]. For instance, studies indicate that individuals who gamble are at a higher risk of experiencing depression, anxiety, substance abuse disorders, and sleep-related problems [15, 16]. For problem gamblers, the risk of suicidal thoughts and attempts is notable [17], given the persistent pressure to win and the emotional fluctuations from losses that affect mental health [18]. Some individuals may also turn to alcohol or drug use to cope with the stress and emotions linked to gambling losses [19]. From a social perspective, gambling can result in engaging in illegal activities such as theft, fraud, or embezzlement to fund a gambling addiction, leading to legal consequences when it affects one’s financial situation [20, 21]. At the family level, problematic gambling has been found to cause distress, resulting in greater dissatisfaction among family members. Additionally, subclinical depression, anxiety, and stress have been reported in such families. These families also experience emotional consequences of problematic gambling, including fear, anger, loss of safety and security, guilt, despair, and uncertainty [22].

Recently, gambling among Ghanaian youth has seen a marked increase. Studies have reported a prevalence of at least 30% of gambling among children and adolescents, including sports betting, lottery, and casino gambling [23, 24]. This highlights the significance of increasing awareness and taking steps to prevent and treat gambling-related disorders [25]. The World Health Organization’s [WHO] inclusion of Gambling Disorder in the International Classification of Diseases further emphasizes the impact that gambling can have on individuals’ health and well-being [14] and the importance of prioritizing gambling prevention, especially among the youth.

In an attempt to curb online gambling among the Ghanaian youth, the government has placed a 10% tax on bet winnings [26] but the impact of the measure is yet to be felt. Hence, the government’s endeavors to tackle problematic gambling have achieved only limited success thus far. Despite implementing various initiatives, such as enforcing stricter regulations on betting activities, providing educational programs that highlight the risks of substance abuse and pathological gambling, and offering support for individuals dealing with gambling addiction through treatment centers and counseling services, the issue persists [27, 28].

Ghana has a sizable youth population, with 38% of the 31 million population aged 15–35 years [29]. Therefore, there is a need to prioritize issues of public health concern that affect the youth. However, despite the acknowledgment of problematic gambling among Ghanaian youth [27, 28], there is limited literature on gambling severity, and psychological distress is scarce to guide policy decisions. Previous studies have only focused on some facets of the subject. For instance, Kyei-Gyamfi and colleagues [23] only examined the prevalence, predictors, and consequences of gambling among coastal-dwelling Ghanaian children, while other studies looked into gambling initiation and its associated perceived beliefs among the youth [30]. Also, the attitudes and protective factors of youth gambling [31], the sociocultural and environmental determinants of youth gambling [32] as well as the prevalence and gender differentiation of gambling among adolescents in the country [24] have been investigated in the past. However, with the nexus between gambling severity and psychological distress seldom addressed in the country, we aimed to empirically expound on the extent of the problem among the Ghanaian youth to inform youth gambling-related educational programs, policy, and research in the country and also add to the body of literature on gambling severity and psychological distress.

Materials and methods

Study site description

The Volta region of Ghana was used as a case for the conduct of this study. The Volta Region is one of Ghana’s sixteen regions, with Ho as its capital [33]. The total population of the Volta Region is about 1,659,040 according to the 2021 population and housing census data [34]. The Volta Region, which borders the Oti Region in the north, the Gulf of Guinea in the south, the Eastern Region in the west, and the Republic of Togo in the east, lies within longitudes 000 15’W and 100 15’E and latitudes 600 15’N and 800 45’N [34]. It has a total land area of 9,504 square kilometers (km2), accounting for 8.7% of Ghana’s total land area [35]. The Volta Region, like the rest of Ghana, has a tropical climate with mild temperatures ranging between 21 and 320 degrees Celsius for most of the year [36]. Like other regions of the country, the Volta region has seen a spike in online sports betting among the youth [37], which is of public health concern, hence its choice for the study. Figure 1 depicts the location of the Volta region of Ghana.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Map of Ghana depicting the location of the Volta Region

Full size image

Study design

A cross-sectional design was adopted for this study. The design necessitated visits to betting centers in the Volta Region of Ghana for the collection of data from young adults engaged in sports betting at a point in time. To identify gambling centers in each town, data on registered betting firms operating in the town and their respective locations were obtained from the revenue departments of the various district/municipal assembly offices. To be considered as a betting center, the center needed to have an operational license, sell computerized betting tickets to their clients, and have its operations known to the respective district/municipal assembly.

Study population

The study was carried out among youths aged 18 to 35 years who engaged in sports betting and resided in the Volta Region of Ghana. Ghana’s national youth policy [38] defines youth as individuals between the ages of 15–35 years. This categorization was adapted for this study because individuals under 18 years old are legally prohibited from participating in betting in Ghana and were therefore excluded. Moreover, potential participants who did not provide consent to participate in the study were excluded.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The study sample size was determined using Cochran’s formula: n = \(\:\frac{{\text{z}}^{2}\:\:\:\text{p}\left(\text{q}\right)}{{\text{d}}^{2}}\) [39]. In this sample size estimation, z represents the reliability coefficient corresponding to a 95% confidence interval (1.96), p denotes the estimated proportion of an attribute present in the population (assumed to be 50% due to unknown exact prevalence), q stands for the acceptable deviation from the assumed proportion (1 - P), and d indicates the margin of error around the proportion, estimated as 0.05 in this study. Plugging in the values: n = \(\:\frac{{\left(1.96\right)}^{2}.\:\:\:0.5\left(0.5\right)}{{0.05}^{2}}=384.16\)

A 5% non-response rate was added to account for possible non-response or incomplete data, resulting in a minimum total of 405 individuals to be interviewed.

The multi-stage sampling technique was used to recruit the participants for the study. First, the district capitals in the region with designated sports betting centers were identified. Ten of the eighteen districts/municipalities in the region were identified to have designated betting centers. Secondly, five of the districts/municipalities (50%) were then sampled for inclusion using the lottery method. These were Ketu South, Keta District, South Tongu District, Ho Municipality and the Hohoe Municipality. As the proportion of youth engaged in sports betting in each district was unknown, the sample size was distributed equally among the selected districts/municipalities by dividing the total sample size by the number of selected districts.

Thirdly, participants were recruited in each selected town within a district using a convenient sampling approach. Any potential participant who was readily available and willing to participate at any sports betting center was included in the study until the required sample size for the district was reached.

Study variables and instrument

The study made use of an interviewer-administered questionnaire. It focused on two primary constructs: gambling severity and mental health status. Gambling severity, the independent variable, was assessed using the nine-item Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI), which is a widely validated scale [40,41,42]. The nine-item 4-point Likert scale response questions rated from 0 (never) to 3 (almost always) start with the query, “When you think of the past 12 months, have you bet more than you could really afford to lose?” and end with “Have you felt guilty about the way you gamble or what happens when you gamble?” The scale demonstrated an overall coefficient alpha (α) of 0.80.

The dependent variable, mental health status, was evaluated using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS 21), an extensively validated instrument [43, 44]. Comprising 21 items, the scale is distributed evenly across three mental health domains: stress, anxiety, and depression, with seven items allocated to each. A comprehensive description of the scale is provided by Lovibond [45]. The internal consistency of the scale for this study was good, yielding α = 0.85 for both stress and depression domains, α = 0.84 for anxiety, and an impressive overall mental health composite score of α = 0.94. Further details on the utilization of the scale in this study can be found in Supplementary File. The study also collected data on demographic factors, including age, marital status, religion, occupation, education level, and ethnic background. Acknowledging the ethical considerations associated with these variables, all factors were designated as optional for participants, except age and sex, which were deemed essential for conducting a thorough analysis and meeting sex/gender-based analysis considerations.

The interviewer-administered questionnaire was divided into three sections: socio-demographic information of participants, the assessment of mental health, and the assessment of problematic gambling. Five data collectors with degrees in public health were trained for two weeks on data collection techniques and related ethics, as well as on the Kobo Collect software, which is used to develop a questionnaire to assist with data collection [46]. Data collected with the Kobo Collect software is easy to export to any format for analysis, making it user-friendly, user friendly, hence its choice for questionnaire design and data collection. It also saves researchers from using paper-based questionnaires for data collection [47]. The interviews were conducted in secluded areas within the premises of the betting centers to avoid the glare of the crowd. It took participants an average of 35 min to complete the questionnaire. The data were collected from May to June 2023.

Statistical analyses

The data collected, using Kobo-collect, was exported to Excel for cleaning and processing. Descriptive analysis involving participant characteristics, followed by reliability exploration and estimation of gambling prevalence and psychological distress status, was carried out with the help of Excel (2019) and Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program (JASP) [0.18.20] statistical software.

The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS) employed in this study had a four-point response rating, coded from 0 to 3. Scores were multiplied by 2 to compute the final score, which was categorized into five levels for each domain (anxiety, stress, and depression) and overall psychological distress following Lovibond’s recommendations [45]. Similarly, for the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) scale, a four-level classification was established based on the total scores derived from the nine items for each observation. Specifically, a total score of zero was classified as non-problematic, 1 or 2 as low level, 3 to 7 as moderate level, and 8 and above as problem gambling [40]. Directions and detailed analysis procedures for both the DASS and PGSI scales, which were strictly followed, are described in previous studies [40, 45].

The inferential analysis was conducted using the bootstrap technique within multiple regression models to ensure robust estimates. The bootstrap technique was employed due to a modest deviation of the data from normal data distribution. This method was used to quantify the uncertainty associated with violating critical parametric assumptions and, as a result, generate more robust estimates. The bootstrap method has been found to produce more “accurate estimates of a parameter than the analysis of any one of the samples” [48]. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value less than or equal to 0.05. Visual representations of the relationships between gambling severity and overall psychological distress were integrated into the inferential analysis for a clear visual understanding of the associations.

Results

Demographic characteristics of participants

Table 1 provides detailed information on the demographic characteristics of the study participants. Most participants were in the 18–24 age group (64.9%), single (87.9%), and male (93.9%). The predominant religion among participants was Christianity (87.9%), with self-employment being the most common occupation (42.4%). A majority of participants had secondary education (57.4%), with the Ewe ethnic group being the largest (73.7%).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of participants
Full size table

Gambling severity among participants

One of the study’s objectives is to describe the levels of gambling severity within the designated population. The subsequent analysis of PGSI scores within the cohort of interest revealed discernible patterns. Approximately 16.4% of the youth participating in sports gambling exhibited no moderate to problematic gambling behavior. Moreover, around 43.8% exhibited a classification within the moderate range of gambling problems, indicating potential negative consequences. Significantly, an estimated 39.8% of the cohort fell within the category of problem gambling, indicating a marked susceptibility to negative outcomes and potential loss of control. Hence, the total prevalence of gambling that can lead to negative consequences (moderate and problem gambling) is estimated at 83.6%. Figure 2 visually illustrates the distribution of problem gambling among the sampled youth. Further descriptive statistics pertaining to the PGSI scale outcomes can be found in the supplementary file.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of gambling severity among participants

Full size image

Psychological distress of participants

This study also aimed to assess the psychological distress of youth involved in sports gambling, utilizing the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS). As shown in Fig. 3, the prevalence of depression among the participants is 43.6%. This was obtained after summing up the percentages of the severe and extremely severe cases. Likewise, by combining severe and extremely severe cases of anxiety, its prevalence is estimated at 68.8%. The prevalence of stress is estimated at 31.1% using the same procedure. Therefore, averaging the three estimates results in a 47.89% overall prevalence of severe psychological distress. Additional descriptive statistics of the scale outcome (mean, standard deviation, etc.) can be found in the supplementary file.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Prevalence of psychological distress among participants

Full size image

To examine the impact of gambling severity on psychological distress, we conducted a correlation analysis to explore the relationships among demographic and key variables. Our analysis revealed several significant correlations, highlighting the complex interplay of these factors. Specifically, we found significant positive correlations between gambling severity and age, betting frequency, depression, and overall psychological distress. Surprisingly, we also found a significant negative correlation between stress and gambling severity.

Additionally, we observed positive correlations among the various dimensions of psychological distress as well as with the overall psychological distress variable. However, most other relationships between variables did not reach statistical significance. For a detailed overview of these relationships, please refer to Table 2.

Table 2 Correlation matrix
Full size table

Impact of gambling severity on psychological distress

Table 3 presents the model fitness results for two regression models. Model 1, which excludes the impact of gambling severity on psychological distress, could only explain 4% of the variability observed in the dependent variable. In contrast, Model 2 illustrates a significant enhancement in model fitness compared to Model 1. By incorporating gambling severity into the analysis (Model 2), the model can now explain approximately 27% of the variability in the dependent variable, psychological distress. This improvement is backed by a significant F-statistic of 93,398.6, with a p-value less than 0.001.

Table 3 Model fitness
Full size table

The bootstrap results for both models are presented in Table 4. Among the variables, sex and religion exhibited statistical significance. In Model 2, sex did not remain statistically significant (β = 2.036, CI, 0.286–3.85), suggesting that males were more susceptible to psychological distress issues associated with gambling than females. While most of the included variables did not show statistical significance, the primary variable of interest, gambling severity, demonstrated statistical significance. Individuals with problem gambling had a higher chance of experiencing psychological distress issues compared to the reference group, the non-problem gambling category (β = 9.228, CI: 7.45–10.97), followed by those with moderate gambling levels (β = 3.283, CI: 1.59–4.74). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the ‘no gambling’ and ‘low gambling severity’ categories (β = -0.013, CI: -1.97-1.62). To better understand the relationship between psychological distress and levels of gambling severity, visual modeling was utilized. As can be seen in Fig. 4, increasing levels of gambling severity lead to increasing psychological distress status from zero (i.e., normal state) to abnormal levels.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Visual depiction of the correlation between gambling severity and psychological distress

Full size image
Table 4 Bootstrap coefficients for both models
Full size table

Discussion

This study aimed to examine the severity of gambling and its influence on psychological distress among Ghanaian youth gamblers, with a particular emphasis on the Volta Region. It was estimated that 47.89% of gamblers experience psychological distress. Additionally, the study reported a high prevalence of 83.6% moderate to severe gambling among the youth and found that gambling severity worsened the psychological distress of gamblers. Furthermore, the study found that gender and religious affiliation are predictors of psychological distress among youth gamblers.

The prevalence of psychological distress among youth gamblers in Ghana was reported to be 47.89%. Generally, this study finding is consistent with other studies that have reported a higher prevalence of psychiatric disorders among gamblers [49, 50]. The genetic relationship found between depression and anxiety, and gambling may explain this finding [51, 52]. Alternatively, gambling may have contributed to the high depression, anxiety, and stress experienced by gamblers due to feelings of guilt and other stress associated with losing money [53,54,55]. Risky behaviors associated with depressed individuals may also account for the high prevalence of psychological distress among gamblers [52, 56].

On the contrary, other studies have reported a low prevalence of gambling-related psychological distress, with 5% in the US and 22% in England among youth gamblers [57, 58]. These discrepancies in findings may be due to the variety of screening tools employed to assess psychological distress [59, 60]. The challenges of cultural sensitivity and social desirability associated with self-report questionnaires may also account for these differences [60,61,62]. Moreover, while some studies focused on the general population of gamblers, others enrolled only those involved in sports betting [5, 31]. Furthermore, these differences might be attributed to contextual variations in addressing mental health issues. While there are generally targeted psychological health interventions in high-income countries that may have reduced the impact of gambling on psychological distress among young people, the same cannot be said for low-middle-income countries such as Ghana [63,64,65].

Sports betting should be recognized as a public health concern among Ghanaian youth and adequately addressed, as untreated gambling-related psychological distress issues may contribute to the high prevalence of psychological distress among the youth in general. Thus, the recent introduction of a 10% levy on betting earnings in Ghana [26], should be invested in sports betting-related psychological health education, screening, and services among the youth to improve their psychological health outcomes.

Our findings also revealed a high prevalence of moderate to severe problem gambling (83.6%) among the study population. Comparatively, these findings are higher than those of other gambling-related studies. For example, a gambling severity of 31% was found among young people in the United States of America [66]. However, other studies recorded very low severe gambling rates between 4 and 8% among America and Europe youth populations [60, 67,68,69,70]. In Africa, the prevalence of problem gambling to severe gambling was estimated to be above 8% in the majority of the youth in various studies [5, 31, 68].

The etiology for the variations in findings is multifaceted. First, differences in the prevalence of severe gambling problems could be attributed to variations in economic stability within the different countries [5, 31, 62, 70]. Economic gains may account for the high prevalence of severe problem gambling in some low-middle-income countries [71]. For instance, while the majority of the youth in high-income countries may gamble as a hobby, those in low-middle-income countries such as Ghana are mainly motivated by the need to generate income due to the high unemployment rate [5, 31, 72, 73]. For instance, Opoku [70] found that most college students in Ghana were motivated to gamble on sports for monetary reasons. The high prevalence rate of problematic gambling may also be attributed to the elevated levels of depression, anxiety, and stress recorded in the current study, which may have contributed to the risky behavior of gambling [74]. Second, the majority of the studies enrolled students in tertiary education, which may have heightened their awareness of the negative impact of gambling on their academic performance. This could have contributed to the low prevalence of severe problem gambling found in the other studies [70]. Moreover, methodological variations may have contributed to the discrepancies in the prevalence of problematic gambling observed. While we administered the Problem Gambling Severity Index to assess problematic gambling, other studies utilized the Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA), the Lie/Bet Scale, Canadian Adolescent Gambling Inventory (CAGI), and the Gamblers Anonymous Twenty Questions (GA20) [59, 75]. Early awareness and targeted educational interventions by the Ghana Mental Health Authority, the Gaming Commission, and other stakeholders are necessary to reduce problem gambling severity among Ghanaian youth.

When determining the predictors of gambling-related psychological distress, excluding gambling severity in model 1, the results indicated that sex and religion were the only significant predictors of gambling-related psychological distress, with males being at a higher risk of psychological distress than females (Table 4). However, upon including gambling severity in model 2, we observed that gender and gambling severity were predictive of gambling-related psychological distress.

Males being at a higher risk for gambling-related psychological distress than females have been reported in some studies [24, 76, 77]. The gratification associated with risky behaviors in males may explain these findings. The excitement of the activity, the desire for instant rewards, and the search for immediate satisfaction make males more prone to gambling-related psychological distress compared to females [78]. Additionally, gender disparity associated with sports may explain these findings. The majority of sports bettors are football bettors in Ghana because football fandom is male-dominated due to cultural barriers that prevent female participation and interest in football-related activities in the country [79,80,81]. These challenges may explain the reduction in female sports bettors, which subsequently led to a reduction in football gambling and gambling-related psychological distress. Targeted gambling-related interventions in Ghana should thus focus on gender disparity to address gambling-related psychological distress.

In relation to gambling severity, we found that the greater the severity of gambling, the more pronounced the increase in the gambling-related psychological distress among participants. This finding is consistent with studies that found associations between gambling severity and psychological distress among young people [82,83,84]. Sports betting is associated with losses, disappointments, anger issues, guilt, heightened financial strain, and a sense of loss of control [85,86,87]. These issues may sometimes lead to the development of psychological problems such as frequent headaches, insomnia, increased substance use, and psychological distress [88, 89], which may subsequently exacerbate the existing psychological issues experienced by severe gamblers and cause a deterioration in their mental health [90,91,92]. Therefore, interventions to address the onset of problematic gambling among the youth should be of prime importance to the Ghana Health Service and the Gaming Commission of Ghana.

Strengths and limitations of the study

The strength of this study lies in the use of standardized scales, meticulous control of various variables, and the application of the bootstrap technique, collectively contributing to enhancing the validity of the study’s findings. Despite these methodological and statistical strengths, the study is not exempt from limitations.

For instance, the cross-sectional nature of the study implies an inability to establish temporality, hindering the determination of whether the psychological problems identified in the study result from the engagement in gambling activities. We also acknowledge that there was a considerable sample size disparity between genders. Additionally, the convenient selection of participants could lead to an over-representation of individuals who visit gambling shops frequently, increasing the likelihood of having a gambling problem, potentially affects our results. Therefore, it is crucial to interpret the study findings with an awareness of these limitations. Future research endeavors should consider alternative study designs to address the temporal inference challenge and employ additional strategies to reduce response biases associated with the sensitive nature of gambling in the study context.

Conclusion

The study found that psychological distress is more prevalent among youth engaged in sports betting in Ghana, especially among males and individuals experiencing problematic gambling issues. Therefore, the mental health unit of the Ghana Health Service, in collaboration with the Gaming Commission of Ghana, should develop youth-friendly interventions to address problematic gambling among young individuals. Specifically, these programs should focus on adolescent males to discourage them from initiating betting or, at least, delay the onset of online sports betting to impede the progression and exacerbation of problematic gambling severity.

Data availability

The data used in this manuscript is available through the authors upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CAGI:

Canadian Adolescent Gambling Severity Index

DASS:

Depresssion, Anxiety, and Stress Scale

JASP:

Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program

PGSI:

Problematic Gambling Severity Index

SPSS:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

SOGS:

RA-Gambling Screen Revised for Adolescents

WHO:

World Health Organisation

References

  1. Ricijas N, Hundric DD, Huic A. Predictors of adverse gambling-related consequences among adolescent boys. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;67:168–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dell’Osso B, Di Bernardo I, Vismara M, Piccoli E, Giorgetti F, Molteni L, Fineberg NA, Virzì C, Bowden-Jones H, Truzoli R, Viganò C. Managing problematic usage of the internet and related disorders in an era of diagnostic transition: an updated review. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health: CP & EMH. 2021;17:61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steinkuehler CA. The new third place: massively multiplayer online gaming in American youth culture. Tidskrift J Res Teacher Educ. 2005;3(3):17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hume M, Mort GS. Fun, friend, or foe: youth perceptions and definitions of online gambling. Social Mark Q. 2011;17(1):109–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bitanihirwe BK, Adebisi T, Bunn C, Ssewanyana D, Darby P, Kitchin P. Gambling in Sub-Saharan Africa: traditional forms and emerging technologies. Curr Addict Rep. 2022;9(4):373–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sichali JM, Bunn C, McGee D, Marionneau VK, Yendork JS, Glozah F, Udedi M, Reith G. Regulation of gambling in Sub-Saharan Africa: findings from a comparative policy analysis. Public Health. 2023;214:140–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ssewanyana D, Bitanihirwe B. Problem gambling among young people in Sub-Saharan Africa. Front Public Health. 2018;6:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakala C, Paul R, Dalal N, Sheikh WA. Prevalence of sports betting addictive disorder among the medical students at the University of Zambia in Lusaka, Zambia. Med J Zambia. 2019;46(4):329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joel KI, Dauda-Olajide RO, Awosika OJ. Sports gambling among youths: The role of demographic factors and prevalence.

  10. Abu H, Tesfaye Y, Alenko A. Problematic gambling and associated factors among sports bettors in Jimma Town betting centers, South West Ethiopia.

  11. Abdi TA, Ruiter RA, Adal TA. Personal, social, and environmental risk factors of problematic gambling among high school adolescents in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:59–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharp C, Dellis A, Hofmeyr A, Kincaid H, Ross D. First evidence of comorbidity of problem gambling and other psychiatric problems in a representative urban sample of South Africa. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31:679–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Latvala T, Lintonen T, Konu A. Public health effects of gambling –debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abbott MW. Gambling and gambling-related harm: recent World Health Organization initiatives. Public Health. 2020;184:56–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Espadafor M, Martínez S. The negative consequences of sports betting opportunities on human capital formation: evidence from Spain. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0258857.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cowlishaw S, Kessler D. Problem gambling in the UK: implications for health, psychosocial adjustment, and healthcare utilization. Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(2):90–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez-Gonzalez H, Estévez A, Griffiths MD. Internet-based structural characteristics of sports betting and problem gambling severity: is there a relationship? Int J Mental Health Addict. 2019;17:1360–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. David JL, Thomas SL, Randle M, Daube M, Balandin S. The role of public health advocacy in preventing and reducing gambling-related harm: challenges, facilitators, and opportunities for change. Addict Res Theory. 2019;27(3):210–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnaire C, Kovess-Masfety V, Guignard R, Richard JB, Du Roscoät E, Beck F. Gambling type, substance abuse, health, and psychosocial correlates of male and female problem gamblers in a nationally representative French sample. J Gambl Stud. 2017;33:343–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Livingstone C, Adams P, Cassidy R, Markham F, Reith G, Rintoul A, Dow Schüll N, Woolley R, Young M. On gambling research, social science, and the consequences of commercial gambling. Int Gambl Stud. 2018;18(1):56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Markham F, Young M. Big gambling: the rise of the global industry-state gambling complex. Addict Res Theory. 2015;23(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kourgiantakis T, Saint-Jacques MC, Tremblay J. Problem gambling and families: a systematic review. J Social Work Pract Addictions. 2013;13(4):353–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kyei-Gyamfi S, Coffie D, Abiaw MO, Hayford P, Martey JO, Kyei-Arthur F. Prevalence, predictors, and consequences of gambling on children in Ghana. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):2248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Odame SK, Quarshie EN, Oti-Boadi M, Andoh-Arthur J, Asante KO. Adolescent problem gambling in rural Ghana: prevalence and gender differentiation. J Gambl Stud. 2021;37(1):83–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pullman RE, Potenza MN, Kraus SW et al. Cassetta. Recommendations for increasing research on co-occurring serious mental illness and gambling problems: commentary on: disordered gambling and psychosis: prevalence and clinical correlates (2018). J Behav Addict. 2018;7(4):897–9.

  26. Oduro-Mensah D. GRA to implement 10% withholding tax on betting, lottery winnings from August 15. Retrieved from: GRA to implement 10% withholding tax on betting, lottery winnings from August 15 (citinewsroom.com).

  27. Acheampong EY, Sarpong EO, Mahamah M. Understanding sports betting among young male student-teachers in Ghana. J Gambl Issues. 2022;49.

  28. Chioma OO, Bridget IU, Ifeyinwa CN, Fidelia OE. Knowledge and indulgence in substance abuse among adolescents in Anambra state, South-East Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2022;22(1):227–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. The Conversation. Ghana’s population is young and rapidly urbanizing - policies need to match the data. 2023. Ghana’s population is young and rapidly urbanising - policies need to match the data (theconversation.com).

  30. Tagoe VN, Yendork JS, Asante KO. Gambling among youth in contemporary Ghana: understanding, initiation, and perceived benefits. Afr Today. 2018;64(3):53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Glozah FN, Tolchard B, Pevalin DJ. Participation and attitudes towards gambling in Ghanaian youth: an exploratory analysis of risk and protective factors. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2019;33(4):20180175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Appiah MK, Awuah F. Socio-cultural and environmental determinants of youth gambling: evidence from Ghana. Br J Psychol Res. 2016;4(4):12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ibine B, Sefakor Ametepe L, Okere M, Anto-Ocrah M. I did not know it was a medical condition: predictors, severity and help-seeking behaviors of women with female sexual dysfunction in the Volta region of Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0226404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Volta Regional Coordinating Council. About the Volta Region, visit http://voltaregion.gov.gh/index.php/about-us/

  35. Spillan JE, King DO, Spillan JE, King DO. The economic climate of Ghana. Doing Business In Ghana: Challenges and Opportunities. 2017:133–75.

  36. GSS & GHS. Ghana demographic and health survey 2014. 2014:1–55.

  37. Yendork JS, Asante KO, Quarshie EN. Football betting among University students in Ghana. In Gambling and sports in a global age 2023 Nov 17 (Vol. 18, pp. 89–107). Emerald Publishing Limited.

  38. Ministry of Youth and sports national youth authority. National Youth Policy (2022–2032).

  39. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. Wiley; 1977.

  40. Ferris JA, Wynne HJ. The Canadian problem gambling index. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Miller NV, Currie SR, Hodgins DC, Casey D. Validation of the problem gambling severity index using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch modeling. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2013;22(3):245–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gorenko JA, Konnert CA. Examination of the problem gambling severity index for use with older adults: a Rasch model approach. J Gambl Stud. 2023;39(2):559–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ali AM, Alkhamees AA, Hori H, Kim Y, Kunugi H. The depression anxiety stress scale 21: development and validation of the depression anxiety stress scale 8-item in psychiatric patients and the general public for easier mental health measurement in a post COVID-19 world. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19):10142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Osman A, Wong JL, Bagge CL, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM, Lozano G. The depression anxiety stress Scales—21 (DASS-21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. J Clin Psychol. 2012;68(12):1322–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lovibond SH. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Syd Psychol Foundation. 1995.

  46. Lakshminarasimhappa MC. Web-based and smart mobile app for data collection: Kobo Toolbox/Kobo collect. J Indian Libr Association Now Available at. 2022;57(2):72–9. https://journal.ilaindia.net/

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nampa IW, Talmudic IW, Kano NP, Widinugraheni S, Nations RL. The KoBoCollect for research data collection and management (an experience in researching the socio-economic impact of blood disease in Banana). J Soc Ekonomi Pertanian. 2020;14(3):545–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Diop A, Deme EH. Parametric bootstrapping in a generalized extreme value regression model for binary response. arXiv preprint. 2021;arXiv:2105.00489.

  49. Assanangkornchai S, McNeil EB, Tantirangsee N, Kittirattanapaiboon P, Thai National Mental Health Survey Team. Gambling disorders, gambling type preferences, and psychiatric comorbidity among the Thai general population: results of the 2013 National Mental Health Survey. J Behav Addictions. 2016;5(3):410–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Richard J, Derevensky J. Identifying the relationship between mental health symptoms, problem behaviors, and gambling among adolescents. Annals Behav Sci. 2017;3(2):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Blanco C, Myers J, Kendler KS. Gambling, disordered gambling, and their association with major depression and substance use: a web-based cohort and twin-sibling study. Psychol Med. 2012;42(3):497–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Huggett SB, Winiger EA, Palmer RH, Hewitt JK, Corley RP, Stallings MC. The structure and subtypes of gambling activities: genetic, psychiatric, and behavioral etiologies of gambling frequency. Addict Behav. 2021;113:106662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Buchanan TW, McMullin SD, Baxley C, Weinstock J. Stress and gambling. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020;31:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Swanton TB, Gainsbury SM. Debt stress partly explains the relationship between problem gambling and comorbid mental health problems. Soc Sci Med. 2020;265:113476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sharman S, Roberts A, Bowden-Jones H, Strang J. Gambling in COVID-19 lockdown in the UK: depression, stress, and anxiety. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:621497.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Pozuelo JR, Desborough L, Stein A, Cipriani A. Systematic review and meta-analysis: depressive symptoms and risky behaviors among adolescents in low-and middle-income countries. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022;61(2):255–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. American Psychological Association. How gambling affects the brain and who is most vulnerable to addiction. August 2023. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/07/how-gambling-affects-the-brain

  58. Newlove-Delgado T, Marcheselli F, Williams T, Mandalia D, Davis J, McManus S, Savic M, Treloar W, Ford T. Mental health of children and young people in England, 2022-wave 3 follow-up to the 2017 survey.

  59. Potenza MN, Balodis IM, Derevensky J, Grant JE, Petry NM, Verdejo-Garcia A, Yip SW. Gambling disorder. Nat Reviews Disease Primers. 2019;5(1):51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Floros GD. Gambling disorder in adolescents: prevalence, new developments, and treatment challenges. Adolescent health, medicine, and therapeutics. 2018:43–51.

  61. Richter J, Sagatun Å, Heyerdahl S, Oppedal B, Røysamb E. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ)–self-report. An analysis of the structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011;52(9):1002–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Durmaz A, Dursun İ, Kabadayi ET. Mitigating the effects of social desirability bias in self-report surveys: classical and new techniques. In Applied social science approaches to mixed methods research 2020 (pp. 146–85). IGI Global.

  63. Arora PG, Parr KM, Khoo O, Lim K, Coriano V, Baker CN. Cultural adaptations to youth mental health interventions: a systematic review. J Child Fam stud. 2021;30(10):2539–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mabrouk A, Mbithi G, Chongwo E, Too E, Sarki A, Namuguzi M, Atukwatse J, Ssewanyana D, Abubakar A. Mental health interventions for adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:937723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Toombs E, Kowatch KR, Dalicandro L, McConkey S, Hopkins C, Mushquash CJ. A systematic review of electronic mental health interventions for indigenous youth: results and recommendations. J Telemed Telecare. 2021;27(9):539–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lee GP, Martins SS, Pas ET, Bradshaw CP. Examining potential school contextual influences on gambling among high school youth. Am J Addictions. 2014;23(5):510–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Castrén S, Grainger M, Lahti T, Alho H, Salonen AH. At-risk and problem gambling among adolescents: a convenience sample of first-year junior high school students in Finland. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy. 2015;10:1–0.

  68. Elie AI, Kemo S, Sinet KD, Djibrilla M, Oumou OZ, Elodie AY, Elvire DS, Ignace TC, Anselme D, Francis TT, Prosper G. Online gambling addiction in Parakou (Benin, 2022). Open J Psychiatry. 2023;13(05):421–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Bergamini A, Turrina C, Bettini F, Toccagni A, Valsecchi P, Sacchetti E, Vita A. At-risk gambling in patients with severe mental illness: prevalence and associated features. J Behav Addictions. 2018;7(2):348–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Delfabbro P, King DL, Derevensky JL. Adolescent gambling and problem gambling: prevalence, current issues, and concerns. Curr Addict Rep. 2016;3:268–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Opoku EA. Sports Betting Among Students in Colleges of Education in the Ashanti Region, Ghana (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cape Coast). 2022.

  72. Koomson I, Churchill SA, Munyanyi ME. Gambling and financial stress. Soc Indic Res. 2022;163(1):473–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Aflakpui AA, Oteng-Abayie EF. The demand for sports lottery: evidence from the city of Kumasi in Ghana. J Gambl Bus Econ. 2016;10(2):46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Toyosi AN, Jamiu IK. Sports betting and Nigerian youths: a study of sports betting in Edo State. Int J Bus Mark Manage. 2019;4(9):23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Agbenorxevi CD, Hevi SS, Malcalm E, Akude J, Coleman RK. Gamified problem gambling and psychological distress: the mediated-moderated roles of cognitive and economic motives. J Gambl Stud. 2023;18:1–6.

  76. Nordmyr J, Forsman AK, Wahlbeck K, Björkqvist K, Österman K. Associations between problem gambling, socio-demographics, mental health factors, and gambling type: sex differences among Finnish gamblers. Int Gambl Stud. 2014;14(1):39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wong G, Zane N, Saw A, Chan AK. Examining gender differences for gambling engagement and gambling problems among emerging adults. J Gambl Stud. 2013;29:171–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Phillips DK, Wilson VA, editors. Gambling and gender: men and women at play. Peter Lang; 2009.

  79. Håkansson A, Widinghoff C. Gender differences in problem gamblers in an online gambling setting. Psychol Res Behav Manage. 2020;18:681–91.

  80. Charway D, Strandbu Å. Participation of girls and women in community sport in Ghana: Cultural and structural barriers. Int Rev Sociol Sport. 2023:10126902231214955.

  81. Nnubia UI, Owoh UI, Ugwuanyi NP. EP. Gender perspective to assessing football fandom participation, Team Identification and socialization factors among undergraduate students of universities in Enugu State. J Family Soc Res. 2022;1(1).

  82. Dietz B, Bean J, Omaits M. Gender differences in sport fans: a replication and extension. J Sport Behav. 2021;44(2).

  83. Bristow LA, Afifi TO, Salmon S, Katz LY. Risky gambling behaviors: associations with mental health and a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). J Gambl Stud. 2022;38(3):699–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Butler N, Quigg Z, Bates R, Sayle M, Ewart H. Gambling with your health: associations between gambling problem severity and health risk behaviors, health, and well-being. J Gambl Stud. 2020;36:527–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Gathoni B, Munayi S, Wanjira J, Apaak D, Amakye E. Online sports betting and demographic factors’ effects on student-athletes’ mental health. Int J Phys Educ Recreation Sports. 2024;2(2):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Mazoochi M, Yousefikhah S, Rabiei L. A socio-economic analysis of online gambling. J Inform Technol Manage. 2024;16(2):62–90.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Machoka F. Effect of problem gambling on behavior among students in selected universities in Nairobi, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Daystar University, School of Human and Social Sciences).

  88. Avram F, Sandu ML, Punga V. Effects and interventions regarding therapy in relation to the addiction of gambling. Technium Soc Sci J. 2021;20:578.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Gathoni B, Munayi S, Wanjira J, Apaak D, Amakye E. Online sports betting and demographic factors’ effects on student-athletes’ mental health. Int J Phys Educ Recreation Sports. 2024;2(2):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Goulding S. Gambling advertising within professional football in the United Kingdom and the emotional impacts it has on adult male football fans (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin, National College of Ireland).

  91. Manning V, Dowling NA, Lee S, Rodda S, Garfield JB, Volberg R, Kulkarni J, Lubman DI. Problem gambling and substance use in patients attending community mental health services. J Behav Addictions. 2017;6(4):678–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Russell AM, Browne M, Hing N, Visintin T, Begg S, Rawat V, Rockloff M. Stressful life events precede gambling problems, and continued gambling problems exacerbate stressful life events; a life course calendar study. J Gambl Stud. 2022;38(4):1405–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge our study participants and the betting centers for allowing us to conduct the study.

Funding

There was no specific funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Population and Behavioural Sciences, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Emmanuel Manu & Emefa Priscilla Zanu

  2. Department of Health Administration and Education, Faculty of Science Education, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana

    Francis Acquah & Prince Owusu Adoma

  3. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Walter Sisulu University, Nelson Mandela Drive, Mthatha, South Africa

    Mbuyiselo Douglas

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Emmanuel Akitty

  5. Department of Family and Community Health, Fred N. Binka School of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Hohoe, Ghana

    Mary Akua Ampomah

Authors
  1. Emmanuel Manu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francis Acquah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mbuyiselo Douglas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emmanuel Akitty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emefa Priscilla Zanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mary Akua Ampomah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Prince Owusu Adoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.M. and MAA conceptualized the study, and drafted the manuscript; F.A. analyzed the data, wrote the methods section, and proofread the manuscript; M.D. proofread the manuscript, and provided resources; E.A. and E.Z. collected the data and contributed to the initial draft. P.O.A. provided resources and proofread the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Manu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for the study was sought from the University of Health and Allied Sciences Research Ethics Committee (UHAS-REC A.10[118]22–23). In addition, permission was obtained from the selected betting companies/center in the region. Informed consent was obtained from participants in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards involving human subjects.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manu, E., Acquah, F., Douglas, M. et al. Betting high, feeling low: a cross-sectional examination of gambling severity and psychological distress among Ghanaian youth. BMC Public Health 24, 2032 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19550-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19550-2

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us