Skip to main content

Place of residence and blood sugar testing practices among men: insights from the 2021 Madagascar demographic and health survey

Abstract

Background

In 2021, Madagascar had approximately 13,919 people living with diabetes, with 66.1% of cases being undiagnosed. The implication is that this population are at high risk of developing diabetes complications which will affect their quality of life. However, promoting the uptake of screening practices such as the blood glucose test among the asymptomatic population would offer a chance to reduce the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the country. This study examined the association between place of residence and blood sugar testing practices among men in Madagascar.

Methods

Secondary data from the men recode file of the 2021 Madagascar Demographic and Health Survey (MDHS) was used. A sample of 9,035 were used for the analysis. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were performed in STATA version 14. The results are presented in adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval.

Results

Only 5.83% reported to have ever had their blood glucose/sugar tested by a health professional. Residing in rural areas was associated in lower likelihood of undergoing a test to check one’s blood sugar level [AOR = 0.23; 95%CI = 0.19–0.28] compared to those in urban areas. This association remained consistent even after adjusting for the effects of covariates [AOR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.52–0.86].

Conclusion

We conclude that place of residence plays a significant role in influencing men’s decision to test their blood glucose level. It is, therefore, imperative for the Madagascar Public Health Department to liaise with the government to bridge the rural-urban disparities in terms of accessibility to blood glucose testing services. Practically, this can be achieved by instituting community-based health services centers in the rural areas of Madagascar to mitigate the rural-urban disparities. Also, health education campaigns to raise men’s awareness about the need to test their blood glucose level must necessarily target older men, those without formal education, those without health insurance, and men who have been diagnosed with hypertension.

Peer Review reports

Background

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are on the rise in all countries [1]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the increasing NCDs affecting millions of populations worldwide. Biologically, diabetes is characterised by insulin resistance and dysfunction of the β cells [2]. The 2022 report of the International Diabetes Federation indicates that there are approximately 537 million people living with diabetes worldwide; this figure is projected to increase by 46% by 2045 [3]. The report further shows that people living in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) constitute 4 out of 5 cases [3]. In Africa, there were nearly 24 million people living with diabetes in 2021, with 416,000 deaths attributable to the disease [3]. The International Diabetes Federation further reported that Madagascar had approximately 13,900 people living with diabetes, with 66.1% of cases being undiagnosed [3].

Late diagnosis of diabetes has been found to be associated with several complications [4, 5]. These include renal failure [6], blindness [7], cardiomyopathy and heart failure [8], stroke [9], and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [10]. Hence, early detection and diagnosis of diabetes is essential to promote better management, survivorship and improved quality of life. One of the proven ways to facilitate early detection and diagnosis is through routine blood glucose/sugar tests [10].

The high rates of undiagnosed and its associated complications pose a significant threat to the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.4 which seeks to reduce premature deaths from NCDs [11, 12]. However, promoting the uptake of screening practices such as the blood glucose/sugar test among the asymptomatic population offers a chance to reduce the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the country.

In order for Madagascar’s Ministry of Public Health and other stakeholders to develop interventions that will support early detection and diagnosis of diabetes, it is imperative to know the current situation in terms of the proportion of the population that participates in routine blood glucose/sugar tests and the factors associated with their screening behaviour. Given that previous studies have identified rural residency to be associated with poor screening uptake practices for other NCDs such as prostate cancer [13, 14] and hypertension [15], we hypothesize that men residing in rural areas would be less likely to undergo blood glucose/sugar tests. Despite an extensive literature search, we were not able to identify an empirical or published study that investigated this issue. This presents an important knowledge gap that must be filled to inform policy-making in Madagascar. To provide evidence to support our hypothesis, we examined the association between place of residence and blood sugar testing practices among men in Madagascar using nationally representative data.

Methods

Data source and study design

For this study, we used secondary data from an earlier study, namely from the men recode file of the 2021 Madagascar Demographic and Health Survey (MDHS). In the initial sampling, the MDHS designated the administrative divisions of Madagascar, known as “regions,” as the first stratum [16]. Following this, within each region, the population was subdivided into urban and rural areas, establishing the second stratum. A total of 45 sample strata were created. The 2021 DHS sampling frame was from the 2018 Madagascar General Population and Housing Census. The MDHS utilized a two-stage sampling methodology. The sample was drawn independently from each stratum. In the first degree, 657 clusters were drawn with probability proportional to size. Each selected cluster produced a list of households [16].

Overall, 22,106 households were selected after the count, and 20,790 were identified and occupied [16]. Of these, 20,510 were interviewed at the time of the survey, resulting in a 99% household response rate. A total of 19,879 women aged 15–49 were eligible, and 18,869 were actually surveyed, yielding a response rate of 95% for eligible women, slightly higher in rural areas than in urban areas (96% vs. 93%) [16]. The men’s survey was conducted in one out of every two households: 9,930 men aged 15–59 were eligible, and 9,037 were interviewed, resulting in a response rate of 91% for eligible men. Urban areas had a slightly lower response rate for eligible men (87%) compared to rural areas (92%) [16].

Measures

Dependent variable

Blood glucose/sugar test was the dependent variable. This variable was derived from the question, ‘Have you ever had blood sugar measured by a health professional?’ The original responses were ‘Yes’, ‘No’ and ‘Don’t know’. However, we dropped the ‘Don’t know’ responses (n = 2) from the data to have a binary outcome of ‘0 = No’ and ‘1 = Yes’.

Independent variable

Our independent variable was place of residence which was coded as a binary variable: ‘0’=’Urban’ and ‘1’=’Rural’.

Covariates

A total of eight covariates were included. These were age, educational attainment, wealth index, frequency of newspaper/magazine reading, frequency of radio listening, frequency of television watching, health insurance status, and hypertension diagnosis. Age was coded as: “15–19 years”, “20–24 years”, “25–29 years”, “30–34 years”, “35–39 years”, “40–44 years”, “45–49 years”, “50–54 years”, and “55–59 years”. Education was coded to have the following responses: “No education”, “Primary”, “Secondary”, and “Higher”. The frequency of exposure to the media was categorized as “Not at all”, “Less than once a week”, and “At least once a week”. Wealth index was captured as “Poorest”, “Poorer”, “Middle”, “Richer”, and “Richest”. Health insurance was coded as “Covered” or “Not covered”, while hypertension diagnosis was coded as “Yes” or “No”.

Data analyses

The analyses were performed in STATA version 14 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Firstly, the response ‘Don’t know’ for the outcome variable was dropped. This reduced the working data from 9,037 to 9,035. Using the weighting variable mv005, we weighted the data to offset the effects of sampling bias. Cross-tabulations and Pearson’s chi-square test (X2) were computed. A bivariable logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association between place of residence and blood glucose/sugar test uptake. After this, we fitted a multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between place of residence and blood glucose/sugar test uptake while adjusting for the effects of the covariates. Only variables with p-values < 0.05 were selected into the multivariable logistic regression. The findings from this model were presented in adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval. Prior to fitting the multivariable logistic regression model, we tested for multicollinearity by checking the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). The mean VIF result was 3.83 indicating low multicollinearity. The model with the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was deemed the best model (i.e., Model II).

Results

Background characteristics of respondents

Table 1 shows the distribution of the background characteristics of the respondents. The majority were rural residents (79.58%), aged 15–19 years (21.74%), and had primary education (43.76%). Most of the respondents did not read newspapers or magazines at all (83.40%), listened to radio at least once a week (40.73%), and did not watch television at all (67.00%). The majority were in the richer wealth index (22.63%). The majority lacked health insurance cover (96.52%). Only 7.30% had been diagnosed with hypertension.

Proportion of men who test for blood sugar

Our findings reveal low uptake of blood sugar tests among men; only 5.8% reported to have ever undergone this test (see Table 1). The proportion of blood sugar tests was relatively high among men who resided in urban areas (13.78%), those aged 55–59 years (12.98%), men with higher educational attainment (27.79%), those in the richest wealth index (15.09%), those who had health insurance coverage (25.91%), and those who had ever been diagnosed with hypertension (18.51%). Also, higher testing was observed among men who read newspapers/magazines (17.60%), listened to the radio (8.64%) or watched TV (16.53%) at least once a week (see Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of blood sugar test uptake across the main explanatory variable and covariates

Association between place of residence and blood sugar testing

Residing in rural areas was associated with lower likelihood of undergoing a test to check one’s blood sugar level [AOR = 0.23; 95%CI = 0.19–0.28] compared to those in urban areas. This association remained consistent after adjusting for the effects of the covariates [AOR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.52–0.86]. Men of younger age were less likely to get their blood glucose tested than those aged 55–59 years. Other covariates associated with higher odds of testing blood glucose included having secondary [AOR = 2.39; 95%CI = 1.44–3.98] or higher education [AOR = 5.52; 95%CI = 3.14–9.71], being in the richest wealth index [AOR = 2.19; 95%CI = 1.22–3.96], having health insurance coverage [AOR = 1.74; 95%CI = 1.26–2.39], and having been diagnosed with hypertension [AOR = 2.08; 95%CI = 1.60–2.71]. Listening to the radio [AOR = 1.34; 95CI = 1.01–1.79] and watching TV [AOR = 2.40; 95%CI = 1.74–3.31] at least once a week were associated with higher likelihood of checking one’s blood sugar (see Table 2).

Table 2 Association between place of residence and blood sugar testing

Discussion

This study was conducted using nationally representative data to investigate the role of place of residence in the practice of blood sugar testing among men aged 15–59 years in Madagascar. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multivariate logistic regression model conducted to disentangle the complex associations between residential location and the practice of blood sugar testing, adjusting for other relevant covariates among men aged 15–59 years in Madagascar.

Our analysis shows that, out of the 9,035 men involved in the study, only 5.8% had their blood sugar levels tested. This low screening uptake has the propensity to increase the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in Madagascar, which may adversely impact the country’s efforts and progress to achieving the SGD target 3.4.

Evidence from the results supports our hypothesis that there is a significant association between place of residence and blood glucose/sugar testing practices. Thus, those residing in rural areas were significantly less likely to have their blood sugar level tested. Often, the available supplies and equipment to render the service may be concentrated in hospitals in urban areas, which may not be convenient to those residing in rural settings. For instance, a study conducted in Tanzania yielded similar results, suggesting that most services for NCDs were primarily available at the hospital level [17], which are mainly located in urban settings. Also, men residing in rural areas may have lower levels of awareness about the importance of regular health check-ups, including blood sugar screening, compared to urban populations, which could stem from limited access to health information.

Among the covariates, increasing age was found to be a facilitating factor for men’s uptake of blood glucose/sugar testing. Compared to men aged 55–59 years, those of younger age were significantly less likely to get their blood glucose/sugar level tested. This result is expected as studies have established the positive relationship between older age and the risk of type 2 diabetes [18,19,20]. Therefore, it is possible that men of younger age may perceive themselves as at a lower risk of developing the disease. As opined by the health belief model [21], high perceived susceptibility serves as push factor for individuals to take up health preventive measures.

It was observed that as the educational attainment of the respondents increased, the probability of utilizing blood sugar tests also increased. This finding is analogous to a previous study [22] that found a significant association between higher educational attainment and higher diabetes screening practice. One possible explanation for this may be that men with some level of formal education are more likely to be exposed to health information about the relevance of screening modalities like blood glucose/sugar testing in promoting the early detection and treatment of diabetes.

Exposure to the media, such as radio and television, at least once a week increased the likelihood of individuals testing their blood sugar levels. As postulated by the health belief model [21], individuals would take up health preventive measures when they perceive that the benefits outweigh the cost. Through frequent media exposure, men are informed of the benefits of getting their blood glucose/sugar levels tested. This is likely to make them more health conscious, and dispelling misperceptions that they might hold about testing one’s blood glucose/sugar level. Hence, it is imperative for the Madagascar Ministry of Public Health to leverage the opportunities that TV and radio presents in terms of health information dissemination and awareness creation about the need to participate in blood glucose/sugar testing.

Respondents who were covered by health insurance had significantly higher odds of testing their blood sugar levels. Despite the commendable progress achieved by several SSA countries like Madagascar in their pursuit of universal healthcare access and coverage, financial constraints still hinder the utilisation of diabetes services. For instance, prior studies conducted in Ghana [23] and Tanzania [17] revealed that individuals often forgo blood sugar tests due to financial constraints, as this test is typically not covered under most standard medical insurance policies. Therefore, the findings that health insurance coverage increases the likelihood of undergoing blood glucose/sugar testing underscores a need for Madagascar to expand health insurance coverage.

The analysis revealed that individuals who had ever been diagnosed with hypertension were significantly more likely to have their blood sugar levels tested. This observation is substantiated by the well-established association between hypertension and diabetes, which are two common chronic conditions that often coexist [24, 25]. Insulin resistance can elevate blood sugar levels, potentially damaging blood vessels and contributing to hypertension [26]. Given the heightened diabetes risk among those with high blood pressure, healthcare providers are more likely to recommend diabetes screening for individuals with hypertension compared to those who are normotensive.

Implications for policy and practices

Our study underscores a need for policymakers to consider expanding the availability of blood sugar screening supplies and equipment to rural healthcare facilities, coupled with efforts to educate rural populations about the importance of regular health check-ups. Additionally, public health campaigns should focus on younger age groups, as the study reveals that older men are more likely to undergo testing. Educational programs should also be intensified, targeting individuals with lower levels of formal education to bridge the knowledge gap. Furthermore, the role of mass media in promoting testing behaviour should not be underestimated, and efforts should be made to enhance media campaigns promoting diabetes screening. Lastly, expanding health insurance coverage for blood sugar tests is essential to reduce financial barriers, as demonstrated by the higher testing rates among those with insurance.

Strengths and limitations

This study was based on a nationally representative data, which enhances the generalizability of the findings to the studied population in Madagascar. Moreover, the present study is arguably the first study of its kind in Madagascar that examined how place of residence influences blood glucose/sugar testing among men thus expanding the frontiers of what is already known about screening for diabetes. Notwithstanding, the study was limited by the cross-sectional nature of the MDHS which precludes us from establishing causal relationships. Secondly, the data are self-reported and thus introduces the possibility of recall bias or social desirability bias. Also, the study primarily focuses on men aged 15–59 years, potentially missing valuable insights into blood sugar testing behavior among women and older men (60+). Our reliance on a secondary dataset was also a significant limitation as we were limited to only variables within the dataset. Consequently, other key confounders could not be accounted for in our analysis. These include the perceived benefits, perceived barriers, level of perceived susceptibility, level of engagement in physical activity, and obesity status.

Conclusion

We conclude that place of residence plays a significant role in influencing men’s decision to test their blood glucose level. It is, therefore, imperative for the Madagascar Public Health Department to liaise with the government to bridge the rural-urban disparities in terms of accessibility to blood glucose testing services. Practically, this can be achieved by instituting community-based health services centers in the rural areas of Madagascar to mitigate the rural-urban disparities. Also, health education campaigns to raise men’s awareness about need to test their blood glucose level must necessarily target older men, those without formal education, those without health insurance, and men who have been diagnosed with hypertension.

Data availability

The Madagascar Demographic and Health Survey is freely available at: http://www.dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Abbreviations

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

IDF:

International Diabetes Federation

LMICs:

Low-and-middle-income Countries

NCDs:

Non-communicable Diseases

OR:

Odds Ratio

VIF:

Variance Inflation Factor

References

  1. Wang Y, Wang J. Modelling and prediction of global non-communicable diseases. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Padhi S, Nayak AK, Behera A. Type II diabetes mellitus: a review on recent drug based therapeutics. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. International Diabetes Federation. Regional factsheet: Africa. World Diabetes FoundationDiabetes around the world. 2021. https://diabetesatlas.org/regional-factsheets/?dlmodal=active&dlsrc=https%3A//diabetesatlas.org/idfawp/resource-files/2021/11/IDFDA10-global-fact-sheet.pdf

  4. Cole JB, Florez JC. Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(7):377–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Harding JL, Pavkov ME, Magliano DJ, Shaw JE, Gregg EW. Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia. 2019;62:3–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hahr AJ, Molitch ME. Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with CKD: core curriculum 2022. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022;79(5):728–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kropp M, Golubnitschaja O, Mazurakova A, Koklesova L, Sargheini N, Vo TT, de Clerck E, Polivka J Jr, Potuznik P, Polivka J, Stetkarova I. Diabetic retinopathy as the leading cause of blindness and early predictor of cascading complications—risks and mitigation. EPMA J. 2023;14(1):21–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Palazzuoli A, Iacoviello M. Diabetes leading to heart failure and heart failure leading to diabetes: epidemiological and clinical evidence. Heart Fail Rev. 2023;28(3):585–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krinock MJ, Singhal NS. Diabetes, stroke, and neuroresilience: looking beyond hyperglycemia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2021;1495(1):78–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Doubeni CA, Krist AH, Kubik M, Li L. Screening for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2021;326(8):736–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. WHO global meeting to accelerate progress on SDG target 3.4 on noncommunicable diseases and mental health, 9–12 December 2019, Muscat, Oman: meeting report.

  12. Bennett JE, Kontis V, Mathers CD, Guillot M, Rehm J, Chalkidou K, Kengne AP, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bawah AA, Dain K, Varghese C. NCD countdown 2030: pathways to achieving sustainable development goal target 3.4. Lancet. 2020;396(10255):918–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Obertova Z, Hodgson F, Scott-Jones J, Brown C, Lawrenson R. Rural‐urban differences in prostate‐specific Antigen (PSA) screening and its outcomes in New Zealand. J Rural Health. 2016;32(1):56–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mbugua RG, Oluchina S, Karanja S. Prostate cancer awareness and screening among men in a rural community in Kenya: a cross-sectional study. Afr J Urol. 2021;27(1):1–0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Venkatesh U, Grover A, Vignitha B, Ghai G, Malhotra S, Kishore J, Jaswal N, Yashwanth RD, Durga R, Goel S, Kishore S. Urban–rural disparities in blood pressure and lifestyle risk factors of hypertension among Indian individuals. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022;11(9):5746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Institut National de la Statistique (INSTAT) et ICF. 2022. Enquête Démographique et de Santé à Madagascar, 2021. Antananarivo, Madagascar et Rockville, Maryland, USA: INSTAT et ICF.

  17. Mwangome M, Geubbels E, Klatser P, Dieleman M. Perceptions on diabetes care provision among health providers in rural Tanzania: a qualitative study. Health Policy Plann. 2017;32(3):418–29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tamayo T, Rosenbauer J, Wild SH, Spijkerman AM, Baan C, Forouhi NG, Herder C, Rathmann W. Diabetes in Europe: an update. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):206–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang W, Lu J, Weng J, Jia W, Ji L, Xiao J, Shan Z, Liu J, Tian H, Ji Q, Zhu D. Prevalence of diabetes among men and women in China. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(12):1090–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Menon VU, Kumar KV, Gilchrist A, Sugathan TN, Sundaram KR, Nair V, Kumar H. Prevalence of known and undetected diabetes and associated risk factors in central Kerala—ADEPS. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;74(3):289–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Green EC, Murphy EM, Gryboski K. The health belief model. The Wiley encyclopedia of health psychology. 2020 Sep 2:211-4.

  22. AshaRani PV, Devi F, Wang P, Abdin E, Zhang Y, Roystonn K, Jeyagurunathan A, Subramaniam M. Factors influencing uptake of diabetes health screening: a mixed methods study in Asian population. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Nyarko BE, Amoah RS, Crimi A. Boosting diabetes and pre-diabetes detection in rural Ghana. F1000Research. 2019;8:289.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galicia-Garcia U, Benito-Vicente A, Jebari S, Larrea-Sebal A, Siddiqi H, Uribe KB, Ostolaza H, Martín C. Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(17):6275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdissa D, Kene K. Prevalence and determinants of hypertension among diabetic patients in Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019. Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity. 2020 Jul 1:2317–25.

  26. Yildiz M, Esenboga K, Oktay AA. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus: highlights of a complex relationship. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020;35(4):397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the DHS Program for granting free access to the dataset.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JO conceived and designed the study. JO designed and performed the formal analysis. CA provided methodological insights. KSD supervised the study. JO and CA drafted the initial manuscript. JO, CA, BS, and KSD read, revised and approved the final manuscript for submission. JO had the responsibility of submitting the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Okyere.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The author did not need to seek ethical clearance because the DHS dataset we used is publicly available. The author obtained the datasets from the DHS Program after completing the necessary registration and getting approval for their use. The approval to use the data was given by the DHS Program. As part of the ethics processes, the DHS program obtained informed consent from all the participants. The author followed all the ethical guidelines that pertain to using secondary datasets in research publications. You can find detailed information about how we used the DHS data and the ethical standards we followed at this link: http://goo.gl/ny8T6X.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okyere, J., Ayebeng, C., Sakyi, B. et al. Place of residence and blood sugar testing practices among men: insights from the 2021 Madagascar demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health 24, 1690 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19248-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19248-5

Keywords