Skip to main content

Association between sedentary behavior, screen time and metabolic syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between sedentary behavior, screen time and MetS among Chinese children and adolescents aged 7–17 years. Data was obtained from the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance of Children and Lactating Mothers in 2016–2017.

Methods

Data on sedentary time, screen time, and MetS indicators were obtained through physical and health questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations. MetS was defined according to the Cook’s criteria. Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-square test were applied for comparisons of measurement data and counting data, respectively. The relationship between sedentary time, screen time, and MetS and its components was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results

The prevalence of MetS among 7-17-year-old students in 2016–2017 was 5.45%. Compared to those with low sedentary behavior, in high sedentary behavior groups, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS was high in boys, and the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, hyperglycemia, and MetS was high in girls. Moreover, for those who reported ≥ 3 h/day of screen time, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, low HDL-C, and MetS was higher in boys, and the prevalence of abdominal obesity and MetS was higher in girls. After adjusting for confounding variables, the risks of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS were higher in high-level sedentary time group, and the risks of abdominal obesity and MetS were 1.15 and 1.14 times higher for those who spent ≥ 3 h/day on screen time, respectively.

Conclusions

This study shows that high levels of sedentary time and screen time were associated with an increased likelihood of MetS among Chinese children and adolescents aged 7–17 years. Reducing sedentary behavior and screen time may contribute to the prevention of metabolic diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of interconnected factors that directly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1], has drawn public attention for decades. In recent years, the prevalence of MetS in children and adolescents has gradually increased and has became a worldwide public health issue. In 2020, 2.8% children and 4.8% adolescents had MetS globally, equating to approximately 25.8 million children and 35.5 million adolescents [2]. According to Noubiap et al., among the 44 countries in their study, Nicaragua (5.2%), Iran (8.8%), and Mexico (12.3%) had the highest prevalence of MetS in children, and Iran (9.0%), United Arab Emirates (9.8%), and Spain (9.9%) had the highest prevalence of MetS in adolescents [2].

Sedentary behavior refers to any waking behavior such as sitting or learning with an energy expenditure of 1.5 metabolic equivalent task or less [3]. A sedentary lifestyle increases all-cause mortality and the risks for CVD, diabetes mellitus (MD), hypertension (HTN), and cancers [4, 5]. Nowadays, sedentary time remains high among children and adolescents, and in many countries, the trend keeps rising over the past few decades. Across the 97 countries with knowledge on sitting in the Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS), 25% boys and 24% girls aged 13–15 years reported sitting for more than 3 h/day in addition to sitting at school and for homework [6]. From 2007 to 2016, sitting time of U.S. adolescents increased from 7 h per day to 8.2 h per day [7].

A growing body of literature suggests that excessive use of electronic devices could lead to poor eye health [8, 9], risks of chronic disease such as obesity [10, 11], hypertension [12, 13], and insulin resistance [14], poor sleep [9], depression and anxiety [15, 16]. 95% U.S. adolescents reported having or accessing to a smartphone [17]. Prevalence of 11-15-year-olds watching TV for ≥2 h on weekdays ranged from 45% (Switzerland) to 69% (United Kingdom, Wales) among boys, and from 40% (Switzerland) to 72% (Bulgaria) among girls. Prevalence of playing computer games for ≥2 h on weekdays ranged from 32% (Switzerland) to 68% (Denmark) in boys, and from 11% (Finland) to 47% (Netherlands) in girls [6].

Studies have revealed that sedentary behavior and high screen time are associated with an increased likelihood of MetS [18,19,20], while modification of lifestyle-associated risk factors is critical for the prevention and management of MetS [21]. Meanwhile, childhood and adolescence are critical periods for establishing healthy living habits [22]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess and manage risk factors of MetS to improve their lives. We used the data from the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance of Children and Lactating Mothers in 2016–2017 to investigate the relationship between sedentary behavior, screen time and MetS among Chinese children and adolescents aged 7–17 years.

Methods

Study design and participants

Data was obtained from the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance of Children and Lactating Mothers in 2016–2017 [23]. A complex, stratified multi-stage cluster random sampling design was performed. 31 provinces in China were divided into four categories: large cities, small and medium-sized cities, rural areas, and impoverished rural areas. Among these four types of areas, 275 survey sites were randomly selected, including 31 large cities, 101 small and medium-sized cities, 97 rural areas, and 46 impoverished rural areas. At each survey site, two primary schools, two junior high schools, and one senior high school were randomly selected, and one class was selected from each grade. Grade 9 and grade 12 were excluded because of the poor compliance. A total of 280 students were chosen from each survey site, with equal number of boys and girls. Participants with major physical and mental illness were excluded.

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the National Institute for Nutrition and Health of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (approval No.: 201,614). The informed consent was signed by all participants or their guardians.

Survey methods and contents

Four parts were created for and included in the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance of Children and Lactating Mothers in 2016–2017 [23], and three of them were used in this study: physical and health questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations. Basic personal and family information, lifestyle, health condition, and physical activity were included in the questionnaire. The questionnaire was evaluated and verified by experts from Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and has been used for several rounds of the China National Nutrition and Health Surveillance. Referring to the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire from WHO and combining with the national condition of China, the following questionnaire items on sedentary behaviors was included: (1) study; (2) watching TV and videos; (3) using cell phones; (4) playing video games; (5) playing tablets; (6) using other electronic devices; and (7) reading while sitting or reclining. In this study, item (1) to (7) were used to calculate the sedentary time, and item (2) to (6) were used to calculate the screen time. All questionnaires were asked and completed face-to-face by uniformly trained investigators.

All questionnaire data were collected and entered in the national system platform by trained CDC employees. Extreme values were excluded. Data with no personal information (id, age, sex, etc.) and no screen time and sedentary time values were excluded. For item (6) using other electronic devices, duplicate values and activities with other items were deleted. Answers of item (1) to (7) such as “none” “no” and “nothing else” were set as value 0.

Anthropometric measurements and clinical examinations

Waist circumference (WC) was measured horizontally at the midpoint between the inferior edge of the costal arch and the iliac crest in the midaxillary line using a tape. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured three times in one-minute intervals by an electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron HBP 1300, Tokyo, Japan). The mean value of the two nearest measurements were calculated.

6 mL fasting blood samples were collected for triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and fasting blood glucose (FBG). FBG was measured using glucokinase method (Roche P800 automatic biochemical analyzer), and TG and HDL-C were measured using enzyme colorimetry (Roche Cobas C701 automatic biochemical analyzer series).

Metabolic syndrome

MetS was defined according to the Cook’s criteria [24], a modified version of the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) criteria for children and adolescents. Participants having at least 3 of the following 5 risk factors were defined as having MetS: (1) abdominal obesity: WC≥ 90th percentile for age and sex, determined by the cutoff points for Chinese children and adolescents [25], (2) elevated blood pressure: SBP or DBP≥ 90th percentile for age, sex, and height [26], (3) high triglycerides: serum TG≥ 1.24 mmol/L, (4) low HDL-C: HDL-C≤ 1.03 mmol/L, (5) high fasting blood glucose: FBG≥ 6.1 mmol/L.

Diagnostic criteria

The sedentary time was categorized in quartiles. And based on the data and its distribution, three levels of sedentary time were made: low level (Q1): < 6.26 h/day, medium level (Q1-Q3): 6.26–9.75 h/day, and high level(Q3): >9.75 h/day. There were 14,624, 29,406, and 14,682 participants in the low-level, medium-level and high-level groups, respectively. The screen time was categorized into three groups according to the Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Children and Youth [27] and the distribution of data: < 2 h/day, 2–3 h/day and ≥ 3 h/day.

Statistical analysis

SAS software (v.9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was applied. For non-normal distribution data, median and interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe continuous variables; and categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied to compare measurement data between groups, and chi-square test was used for comparison of counting data. The relationship between sedentary time, screen time, and MetS and its components was analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model, and the effect of confounding factors were adjusted. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 58,712 participants were included in the study. The prevalence of MetS among 7-17-year-old students in 2016–2017 was 5.45%. The prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, hyperglycemia, and HTN were 15.58%, 15.92%, 11.34%, 1.63%, 38.14%, respectively. Boys had higher prevalence of MetS than girls (p < 0.05). With an increasing age, the prevalence of MetS increased (p < 0.05). In addition, urban students were more likely to have MetS than rural students; and high levels of sedentary time and screen time had higher prevalence of MetS (p < 0.05). In terms of MetS components, all of them had worse profiles in MetS group than those in non-MetS group (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

As shown in Table 2, in boys, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS increased with an increase in sedentary time (p < 0.0001). In girls, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, hyperglycemia, and MetS was higher in high-level sedentary time group than those in low-level sedentary time group (p < 0.05). As far as screen time, in boys, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, low HDL-C, and MetS increased with the increase in screen time (p < 0.05); and in girls, the prevalence of abdominal obesity and MetS was higher for those who spent ≥ 3 h/day on screen time (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics according to MetS status
Table 2 Prevalence of MetS components in different sedentary time groups
Table 3 Prevalence of MetS components in different screen time groups

After adjusting for confounding variables (age, gender, residence, per capita household income, and physical activity), the risks of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS were higher in high-level sedentary time group than those in low-level sedentary time group (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31–1.52, p < 0.0001; OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.08–1.25, p < 0.0001; OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03–1.22, p < 0.01; OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20–1.52, p < 0.0001, respectively) (Table 4). In boys, compared with low-level sedentary time group, the risks of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS were higher in high-level sedentary time group (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27–1.56, p < 0.0001; OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06–1.32, p < 0.01; OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10–1.40, p < 0.01; OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12–1.55, p < 0.01, respectively) (Table 4). In girls, the risks of abdominal obesity, high TG, and MetS were higher for those with high level of sedentary behavior (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.28–1.57, p < 0.0001; OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.26, p < 0.01; OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16–1.63, p < 0.01, respectively) (Table 4).

In Table 5, after adjusting for confounding variables (age, gender, residence, per capita household income, and physical activity), the risks of abdominal obesity and MetS were 1.15 and 1.14 times higher for those who reported ≥ 3 h/day of screen time, respectively (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.08–1.22, p < 0.01; OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.25, p < 0.01, respectively).

Table 4 Associated factors of the sedentary time and MetS and its components using logistic regression analysis (OR (95% CI of OR) )
Table 5 Associated factors of the screen time and MetS and its components using logistic regression analysis (OR (95% CI of OR) )

Discussion

According to the Report on Chinese Residents’ Chronic Diseases and Nutrition 2020, the physical activity deficiency (Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity < 60 min/day) rate among Chinese children and adolescents aged 6–17 was 86.0% [28]. The most recent global data show that 81% of adolescents does not meet WHO’s recommendation levels of physical activity [29]. Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior of children and adolescents drew extensive attention worldwide.

The present study focused on the associations between hot problems: sedentary behavior, screen time and MetS. It showed that the overall prevalence of MetS among 7-17-year-old Chinese children and adolescents was 5.45%, which was higher than 2.4% in Beijing [30] and Guangzhou [31]. This could be explained by the differences in age range and diverse criteria of MetS that were applied, and most importantly, the different regions in which we studied. To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide study that discover the association between sedentary behavior, screen time and MetS among students. Although some studies reported no sex difference in the prevalence of MetS [32, 33], our study found that boys were more likely to have MetS than girls, which was consistent with most studies [22, 30, 31]. Except differences in physiological and genetic structure, it remains challenging to find the potential mechanisms responsible for gender disparities. Interestingly, our previous study showed that screen time of Chinese boys were higher than that of girls [34]. Starting from this aspect, a deeper exploration could be made. Moreover, we observed a positive relationship between MetS and age and this is congruent with previous studies [30, 35]. Possible reasons include changes in hormone regulation of appetite and satiety and fat distribution during puberty [36].

This study found that in boys, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, low HDL-C, and MetS was higher in high-level sedentary time group; while in girls, the prevalence of abdominal obesity, high TG, hyperglycemia, and MetS was higher in those with high-level sedentary behavior. This indicates that sex plays a role in the effects of sedentary behavior on MetS, which is consistent with the Beijing study [30]. The results showed a reverse relationship between the prevalence of HTN and sedentary behavior. This may be because some of the important confounders, such as diet, were not considered. Excessive sodium intake and low potassium intake, as well as a low ratio of potassium to sodium intake are significant risk factors for HTN in China [37]. Therefore, it needs to be considered with dietary factors in future studies. The result revealing that compared with low-sedentary time group, high sedentary behaviors had higher risks of MetS and its components is congruent with other studies. According to Yin et al.,high sedentary behavior time was associated with higher risks of MetS components, including abdominal obesity, high TG, and low HDL-C [30]. A longitudinal study suggested that men with medium to high level of sedentary time had 65% and 76% higher risks of having MetS, respectively [38]. A Brazilian study found that higher screen-based sedentary time was positively related to MetS among adolescents aged 12 to 17 years [39]. According to Berg et al., an extra hour of accelerometer-based sedentary behavior was associated with a 39% increase risk for MetS [40]. The present study found that the odds ratio of HTN in high-level sedentary time group was less than 1, indicating a protective effect of sedentary behavior on HTN. Nevertheless, its 95% CI of OR was close to 1, indicating a null finding. Therefore, this showed that HTN had no relationship with sedentary behavior. A cohort study also found no association between noninteractive sedentary behaviors (such as TV viewing) but not interactive sedentary (such as driving and computer use) and self-reported incident HTN [41]. This suggests that further grouping the sedentary time into different activities can make a deeper investigation and explanation of the associations in the future study.

In the present study, the risk of abdominal obesity was higher for those with high screen time. Indeed, a Brazilian study suggested that students in post puberty phase with screen time ≥ 3 h/day was 1.43 times more likely to have abdominal obesity [42]. A Korean study also found that adolescents aged 12–18 years with daily screen time ≥ 5 h had 3 times increased risk of abdominal obesity compared to those with daily screen time < 3 h [43]. One possible reasons is that adolescents with high screen time consumed less unprocessed foods and more ultra-processed foods [42]. Dietary patterns characterized by high consumption of sodium, animal fat, and refined carbohydrates, and low consumption of fiber are related to risks of elevated blood pressure and increased body adiposity in adolescents [44]. In addition to abdominal obesity, the study showed that screen time is a risk factor for MetS as well. According to Khan et al., students with screen time ≥ 2 h/day were 2.2 times more likely to have MetS [19]. A NHANES study also found a dose-dependent manner between screen time and MetS [45]. A Guangzhou study including 4523 children and adolescents aged 6–13 years suggested that compared to low-level screen time group, medium and high-level screen time groups had an increased likelihood of MetS [31].

Inconsistent with the previous study which found no association between abdominal obesity and sedentary behavior among inactive males and females [46], our study found both screen time and sedentary behavior were associated with abdominal obesity. Abdominal obesity, an establish risk factor and the most prevalent manifestation of MetS, is a maker of dysfunctional adipose tissue. A cohort study revealed that both screen-based and non-screen based sedentary behavior had associations with abdominal adipose tissue deposition [47]. And a robust inverse association was observed for physical activity and visceral adipose tissue accumulation [47]. Although our study controlled physical activity variables, it is recommended to be physically active to prevent abdominal obesity and MetS.

The strengths of this study include a large sample size that incorporated children and adolescents in 31 provinces that could represent the whole nation data, standardized questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, and clinical examinations. Nevertheless, several limitations warrant attention. First, it was a cross-sectional study which could not clarify the causal relationship between sedentary behavior, screen time and MetS. In addition, although completed face-to-face by trained investigators, all questionnaires were self-reported, which was easily subject to recall bias. Moreover, a subjective measure of self-reporting as a means of measuring the sedentary time and the screen time was not precise. Accelerometers and inclinometers that capture data directly from electronic devices are more objective and reliable [48]. However, several shortcomings including lack of a standard cutoff point, difficulty of examining patterns of sedentary time, and poor compliance with wearing the device limit the widespread use of them [48]. Maybe the future study that could combine subjective with objective methods could solve the problem. Besides, our study included both screen-based and non-screen-based sedentary behavior into sedentary behavior. Maybe we will separate them to examine the relationship between each of them and MetS in the future study.

Conclusions

In summary, this study shows that high levels of sedentary time and screen time were associated with an increased likelihood of MetS among Chinese children and adolescents. Thus, in order to avoid MetS, students, parents and schools should work together to develop a healthy lifestyle to reduce sedentary behavior and screen time.

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available for ethical and privacy reasons but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Oliveira RGD, Guedes DP. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic syndrome in adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Noubiap JJ, Nansseu JR, Lontchi-Yimagou E, Nkeck JR, Nyaga UF, Ngouo AT, et al. Global, regional, and country estimates of metabolic syndrome burden in children and adolescents in 2020: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022;6:158–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JH, Ji HM, Kim HJ, Mi HK, Yun HO. Sedentary lifestyle: overview of updated evidence of potential health risks. Korean J Fam Med. 2020;41:365–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Patterson R, Mcnamara E, Tainio M, De Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33:811–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2009;41:998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sluijs E, Ekelund U, Crochemore-Silva I, Guthold R, Katzmarzyk PT. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. Lancet. 2021;398:429–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang L, Cao C, Kantor ED, Nguyen LH, Zheng X, Park Y, et al. Trends in sedentary behavior among the US population, 2001–2016. Jama-J Am Med Assoc. 2019;321:1587–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akinbinu TR, Mashalla YJ. Impact of computer technology on health: computer vision syndrome (CVS). Acad Journals. 2014;5:20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lissak G. Adverse physiological and psychological effects of screen time on children and adolescents: literature review and case study. Environ Res. 2018;164:149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nightingale CM, Rudnicka AR, Donin AS, Sattar N, Cook DG, Whincup PH, et al. Screen time is associated with adiposity and insulin resistance in children. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:612–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pérez-Farinós N, Villar-Villalba C, López Sobaler AM, Dal Re Saavedra MÁ, Aparicio A, Santos Sanz S, et al. The relationship between hours of sleep, screen time and frequency of food and drink consumption in Spaininthe 2011 and 2013 ALADINO: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gopinath B, Baur LA, Hardy LL, Kifley A, Rose KA, Wong TY, et al. Relationship between a range of sedentary behaviours and blood pressure during early adolescence. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26:350–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gopinath B, Hardy LL, Kifley A, Baur LA, Mitchell P. Activity behaviors in schoolchildren and subsequent 5-yr change in blood pressure. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2014;46:724–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy LL, Denney-Wilson E, Thrift AP, Okely AD, Baur LA. Screen time and metabolic risk factors among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164:643–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Woods HC, Scott H, #Sleepyteens. Social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. J Adolescence. 2016;51:41–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maras D, Flament MF, Murray M, Buchholz A, Henderson KA, Obeid N, et al. Screen time is associated with depression and anxiety in Canadian youth. Prev Med. 2015;73:133–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anderson M, Jiang J, Teens. Social Media & Technology.2018.

  18. Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Chaput JP, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Me. 2016;41:240–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan MA, Shah SM, Shehab A, Ghosal S, Muhairi SJ, Al-Rifai RH, et al. Screen time and metabolic syndrome among expatriate adolescents in the United Arab Emirates. Diabetes Metab Synd. 2019;13:2565–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mark AE, Ian J. Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Public Health-Uk. 2008;30:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Park HS, Oh SW, Cho SI, Choi WH, Kim YS. The metabolic syndrome and associated lifestyle factors among South Korean adults. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33:328–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. You MA, Son YJ. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and associated risk factors among Korean adolescents: analysis from the Korean national survey. Asia-Pac J Public He. 2012;24:464–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dongmei Y, Liyun Z, Lahong J, Qiya G, Hongyun F, Xiaoli X, et al. Status of energy and primary nutrients intake among Chinese population in 2015—2017. Food Nutr China. 2021;27:5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cook S, Weitzman M, Auinger P, Nguyen M, Dietz WH. Prevalence of a metabolic syndrome phenotype in adolescents: findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:821–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. High waist. Circumference screenning threshold among children and adolescents aged 7–17 years, WS/T611-2018.2018.

  26. Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2018 Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension. Chin J Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 24:24 – 5.

  27. Tremblay MS, Leblanc AG, Janssen I, Kho ME, Hicks A, Murumets K, et al. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Me. 2011;36:59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prevention TNBO. Report on Chinese Residents’ Chronic Diseases and Nutrition 2020; 2021.

  29. World Health Organization. Global status report on physical activity 2022. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yin N, Yu X, Wang F, Yu Y, Wen J, Guo D, et al. Self-reported sedentary behavior and metabolic syndrome among children aged 6–14 years in Beijing, China. Nutrients. 2022;14:1869.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang H, Gui Z, Zhang J, Cai L, Tan W, Chen Y. Association between screen time and metabolic syndrome among 6–13 year old children in Guangzhou. Chin J Sch Health. 2019;40:1780–3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dubose KD, Stewart EE, Charbonneau SR, Mayo MS, Donnelly JE. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in elementary school children. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Son HJ, Kim MK, Kim HJ, Kim H, Choi BY. The relationship between physical activity and clustering of metabolic abnormalities in children. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41:427–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng X, Yu D, Zhao L, Ju L, Guo Q, Fang H, et al. Current situation of screen time among Chinese primary and middle school students from 2016 to 2017. J Hygiene Res. 2022;51:347–52.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wittcopp C, Conroy R. Metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rev. 2016;37:193–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Zhu Y, Cai L, Jing J, Chen Y, Mai J, et al. Metabolic syndrome and its associated early-life factors in children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study in Guangzhou, China. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19:1147–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Joint Committee for Guideline Revision. 2018 Chinese guidelines for prevention and treatment of hypertension-a report of the Revision Committee of Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2019; 16:182–241.

  38. Greer AE, Sui X, Maslow AL, Greer BK, Blair SN. The effects of sedentary behavior on metabolic syndrome independent of physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12:68–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schaan CW, Cureau FV, Salvo D, Kohl HWR, Schaan BD. Unhealthy snack intake modifies the association between screen-based sedentary time and metabolic syndrome in Brazilian adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phy. 2019;16:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Berg JD, Stehouwer CD, Bosma H, Velde JH, Willems PJ, Savelberg HH, et al. Associations of total amount and patterns of sedentary behaviour with type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: the Maastricht Study. Diabetologia. 2016;59:709–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. José BJ, Ángel MM, Shah E, Maira BR, Jorge N, Alfredo MJ et al. Sedentary behaviors and the risk of incident hypertension: the SUN Cohort. Am J Hypertens. 2007:1156–62.

  42. Oliveira IDR, Maciel NMS, Costa BT, Soares ADN, Gomes JMG. Association between abdominal obesity, screen time and sleep in adolescents. J Pediatr-Us. 2023;99:45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chung WC, Cho YG, Kang JH, Park HA, Kim OH. Lifestyle habits related to abdominal obesity in Korean adolescents. Korean J Fam Med. 2010;31:547–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Neves MEA, Souza MR, Gorgulho BM, Cunha DB, Muraro AP, Rodrigues PRM. Association of dietary patterns with blood pressure and body adiposity in adolescents: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021;75:1440–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mark AE, Janssen I. Relationship between screen time and metabolic syndrome in adolescents. J Public Health-Uk. 2008;30:153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mcguire KA, Ross R. Incidental physical activity and sedentary behavior are not associated with abdominal adipose tissue in inactive adults. Obesity. 2012;20:576–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Whitaker KM, Pereira MA, Jacobs DR, Sidney S, Odegaard AO, Pereira M. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and abdominal adipose tissue deposition. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2017;49:450–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Barnett TA, Kelly AS, Young DR, Perry CK, Pratt CA, Edwards NM, et al. Sedentary behaviors in today’s youth: approaches to the prevention and management of childhood obesity: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;138:142–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all participants and their guardians for devoting time to our program. Also special thanks to all the investigators for their time and effort on this program.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China Medical Reform Major Program: China National Chronic Diseases and Nutrition Surveillance of Adults (2015–2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, XC and HF; methodology, HF; software, XC and HF; formal analysis, QG; investigation, QG, LJ, WG, XW and LZ; data curation, LZ and HF; writing—original draft preparation, XC; writing—review and editing, XX and HF; project administration, LZ; funding acquisition, LZ. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongyun Fang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (protocol code: 201519-B; date of approval: 15 June 2015). Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, X., Guo, Q., Ju, L. et al. Association between sedentary behavior, screen time and metabolic syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents. BMC Public Health 24, 1715 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19227-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19227-w

Keywords