Skip to main content

Childcare needs as a barrier to healthcare among women in a safety-net health system

Abstract

Background

Childcare needs are an understudied social determinant of health. The effect of childcare needs on access to healthcare must be understood to inform health system interventions and policy reform. This study sought to characterize childcare needs, access to childcare, and prior experience with navigating childcare needs in healthcare settings among women in a safety-net population.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of patient-reported survey data collected in-person between April and October 2019. Surveys were administered in waiting rooms of ambulatory services in a large, urban safety-net health system in Dallas, Texas. Survey respondents were derived from a random convenience sample of women waiting for outpatient appointments. Participants were screened for having children under the age of 13 and/or childcare responsibilities for inclusion in the sample. Outcomes of interest included self-reported delayed or missed care, reasons for delayed or missed care, perceived difficulty in accessing childcare, prior methods for managing childcare during healthcare appointments, and prior experience with childcare centers.

Results

Among the 336 respondents (96.7% response rate), 121 (36.0%) reported delaying or missing a mean 3.7 appointments/year. Among women with delayed or missed care, 54.5% reported childcare barriers as the primary reason for deferral of care, greater than transportation (33%) or insurance (25%) barriers. Respondents rated childcare access as more difficult than healthcare access. Delayed or missed care due to childcare was more common among White (68.8%) and Black (55.0%) women compared to Hispanic women (34.3%). Common methods of navigating childcare needs during scheduled appointments included bringing children to appointments (69.1%) and re-scheduling or missing the scheduled appointment (43.0%). 40.6% of patients reported leaving an appointment before completion due to childcare needs.

Conclusions

Childcare needs are a leading barrier to healthcare among women accessing care in safety-net settings. Unmet childcare needs result in deferral of care, which may impact health outcomes. Childcare access is perceived as more challenging than healthcare access itself. Health system and policy interventions are needed to address childcare as a social determinant of health.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Social determinants of health (SDOH) such as access to transportation [1, 2], sick leave from work [3], and insurance [4] are widely recognized as factors that impact patients’ ability to access health services [5,6,7]. While both men and women experience barriers accessing healthcare, studies have demonstrated that women are more likely to delay or forego healthcare when faced with financial and structural barriers to accessing healthcare [8]. In an analysis by the Commonwealth Fund, more than half of women reported postponing preventative services, skipping recommended tests or treatments, or missing prescriptions because of costs, compared to 39% of men [9]. The 2017 Kaiser Women’s Health Survey illustrated that despite the national expansion of health insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act, cost-related and logistical barriers like time off, transportation, and childcare present unique barriers to care among women [10]. Such barriers are exacerbated among women from lower income backgrounds, including those with Medicaid coverage or without insurance [10].

Costs of healthcare have been shown to disproportionately affect women, as women on average have fewer financial resources and are more likely to experience poverty than men [11]. Furthermore, women experience unique logistical barriers related to their role as caretakers; traditional gender roles task women with significant unpaid labor in caring for their families and children [12,13,14]. Women from lower income backgrounds particularly face increased complexity in navigating childcare among competing financial needs [15]. Such convergence of co-existing SDOH was unmasked and amplified during the COVID-19 pandemic, during which women struggled to balance work, financial strain, and childcare needs [16]. Pandemic conditions have underscored the need for childcare policy reform to increase investment in access to childcare for low income families [17, 18]. Federally funded childcare programs such as Head Start and Early Head Start and childcare subsidies aim to support low income families through childcare support and school readiness [19], but access to childcare support remains constrained by limited federal investment and a depleted childcare workforce [17, 19, 20] Current discourse on childcare policy centers on the economic impact of access to childcare, while the impact of childcare needs on health needs remains underrecognized.

While logistical barriers to healthcare like transportation and insurance have been previously explored in the SDOH literature [21,22,23,24], the role of childcare needs on healthcare access remains less understood. Prior studies have suggested that childcare needs pose a barrier to women’s engagement in prenatal care [25, 26], cancer screening and treatment [27,28,29], and substance use disorder treatment [30, 31]. However, childcare needs are often elicited alongside other health-related social needs (HRSN), rather than through dedicated screening tools, and additional investigation is needed to understand unmet childcare needs as a unique, discrete HRSN. Furthermore, policy discourse on childcare needs has centered on the economic impact and workplace costs caused by the shortage of affordable childcare [32], whereas implications of unmet childcare needs on healthcare access and impact to the health and wellbeing of caregivers remain under-explored. This study sought to characterize childcare needs among women in a large safety-net health system population and examine how childcare needs impacted access to healthcare.

Methods

We conducted a needs assessment of women accessing ambulatory services in a large safety-net health system in Dallas County, Texas. This study was reviewed and considered exempt by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The quantitative needs assessment was comprised of categorical survey questions and Likert scale assessments adapted from survey questions administered in the 2017 KFF Women’s Health Survey and prior work from the Commonwealth Fund [10, 33]. Surveys were administered using a script in English and Spanish to a convenience sample of patients in clinic waiting rooms between April and October 2019. Survey questions were validated in a pilot phase of cognitive testing between January and April 2019 among 100 respondents with guidance from a biostatistician with experience in survey design and the use of qualified bilingual language services. A priori sample size for the study phase was selected as 300 completed surveys, and surveys were incorporated into analysis if greater than 70% completed.

Clinics sampled included adult primary and subspecialty care, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgical and medical oncology. Inclusion criteria for participation included women with children present or women who appeared of reproductive age per the interviewer’s assessment. Eligible patients were further screened by the following: “Do you have any children living at home under the age of 13?” and “Do you have or share childcare responsibilities for the children under age 13 in your home?” The age threshold of 13 for children was used due to our health system’s institutional policy requiring supervision of children under 13 and prohibiting any unattended children younger than 13 in clinical areas; this institutional policy is informed by Texas Department of Family and Protective Services recommendations for child supervision [34]. Patients answering affirmatively to both questions were informed about the study and verbally consented to complete the survey which averaged 15 min in length.

The interviewer recorded responses on an encrypted tablet. The interviewer recorded patient arrival and departure times, number of patients, and number of children in clinic waiting rooms daily. The complete survey instrument is available as Supplement 1. Our primary areas of interest were patient-reported volume of missed healthcare appointments, estimated length of delays in care (e.g., less than 1 week, 1 week to 1 month, 1 month to 6 months, more than 6 months), barriers to healthcare appointments (e.g., transportation, work leave, coverage) and patient perception of ease accessing medical care and arranging childcare measured by Likert Scale assessment (e.g., very difficult, moderately difficult, not very difficult, not at all difficult). Baseline demographic information was also self-reported, including primary language, number of children and dependents, number of caregivers in the household, occupation, insurance status, working status, zip code, age, and race/ethnicity. There was an opportunity for open-ended responses at the conclusion of the survey.

Study data was collected and managed through REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted by UT Southwestern and analyzed in Excel and Stata 16. ​ Demographics, categorical survey responses, and Likert scale responses were reported with frequencies and summary statistics. Open-ended responses were reviewed and collated by salient topics.

Results

The survey response rate was 96.7% among 336 respondents. Table 1 represents our study population with baseline characteristics. Participants were similar in sociodemographic characteristics as our health system population [35]. The mean age of survey respondents was 31.3 ± 7.9, and 213 (72.2%) identified as Hispanic and 60 (20.3%) identified as non-Hispanic Black or African-American. Approximately half (54.3%) were not currently working or pursuing studies, though 22.0% were employed full-time. While the majority of patients preferred English as their primary language, 37.6% preferred Spanish. Most individuals (61.3%) reported a household size of 1–4 people, while 38.0% reported 5–8 people in the home. Most respondents (59.3%) reported being the only caregiver in the home, though 34.4% reported an additional caregiver. The majority of respondents (70.6%) reported 1–2 dependents, and 25.5% reported 3–4 dependents. Approximately half of respondents (50.9%) declined having a regular provider for their healthcare; 34.5% reported seeing their obstetrician/gynecologist (OB/GYN) as their usual source of care, compared to 39.9% reporting seeking primary care.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of survey respondents sampled in childcare needs assessment

Mean daily number of patients in waiting rooms was 25.0 ± 14.0, and mean daily number of children in waiting rooms was 5.2 ± 3.5. 121 (36.0%) reported delaying healthcare at least once in the past 12 months, and among this group, 54.5% reported missing an appointment due to lack of childcare (Fig. 1). On average, those 121 respondents delayed 3.7 ± 2.7 appointments per year. When asked about the length of delayed care, 30.9% reported delaying between 1 week to 1 month, and 38.2% reported delaying care further, between 1 and 6 months. Visits most frequently missed were check-ups and well visits (86.8%), however 31.8% reported missing problem visits including specialty appointments and oncologic care. Lack of childcare was the most frequently cited reason for missing care followed by lack of transportation and lack of insurance (Fig. 1). White (68.8%) and Black (55.0%) respondents were more likely to report delaying care in the past 12 months due to childcare needs in comparison with Hispanic respondents (34.3%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

N = 121, respondents who reported delaying or missing a healthcare appointment in the past 12 months

Most women (84.3%) reported being responsible for all or almost all their childcare needs. Figure 2 demonstrates increased self-reported difficulty in accessing childcare and compared to difficulty in accessing healthcare. When asked about experiences balancing healthcare and childcare needs, 69.1% of women reported bringing their child to a healthcare appointment due to lack of childcare, of whom 74.7% reported bringing them into the exam room or leaving them in the waiting room with someone (27.5%). Women shared their approaches managing childcare needs during scheduled healthcare appointments (Fig. 3). Moreover, 40.6% had left a healthcare appointment early to pick up their children, left before seeing the doctor (56.0%) or before the appointment was complete (42.4%). A subgroup (41.3%) specifically reported delaying or missing healthcare because they were not able to schedule an appointment when their child was in school.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Childcare vs. healthcare access, p < 0.001

figure 3

Figure 3

Only 22.3% had ever enrolled their children in a childcare center, and most common reasons for not using one included alternative childcare means with relative/nonrelative caretakers (65.8%). Others reported concerns about safety (25.8%) and lack of affordability (19.6%). Of the 64 women with daycare experience, 68.7% reported overall satisfaction with their experience.

The majority of those surveyed (87.9%) affirmed that a hospital-based daycare would help them attend their healthcare visits. Those unsure most commonly said they would use it in an emergency, and those who declined interest in daycare mainly cited lack of necessity as their current methods of childcare were sufficient. 48.2% reported needing 3–4 h for a single healthcare visit, and 46.5% were willing to pay $11–20 for this amount of childcare. Women ranked the following as extremely important interventions in a childcare center: opportunities to meet staff (81.0%), healthy eating education (80.0%), hand washing education (76.7%), structured activities (75.9%), snacks (66.8%), healthcare checkups for children (64.6%), social support for families (63.2%), and tours of the center (59.5%).

Open-ended answers revealed patterns describing women’s shared experiences managing their own healthcare needs with childcare responsibilities (Table 2). Common topics included difficulty balancing childcare needs with health system policies of clinical spaces, concerns about engaging with daycare centers, interest in hospital-based childcare services, and needs and desires in a potential childcare center.

Table 2 Salient topics recurring in open-ended survey responses
Table 2 Thematic concepts identified in open-ended survey responses

Discussion

This cross-sectional survey of women seeking care in a large, urban health system found that more than half of women who reported missing or delaying care in the past year attributed childcare needs as the primary barrier to accessing healthcare. In addition, on average respondents rated access to childcare as more difficult than access to healthcare. Current approaches to navigating competing childcare needs during healthcare appointments included relying on social networks and bringing children to healthcare settings for appointments. Few patients in our sample had prior experience with daycare centers, but survey responses reveal patient interest in hospital-based childcare services. These key findings supports previous findings from the Commonwealth Fund [9] and the KFF Women’s Health Survey [10] by demonstrating the burden of childcare barriers faced by women in underserved settings. Our needs assessment confirmed that childcare is a significant barrier to accessing healthcare, affecting women of all races and ethnicities in our county-funded safety-net health system.

This is one of the first studies to capture the prevalence of childcare as a barrier to healthcare access within a health system and describe in detail women’s unique experiences navigating competing healthcare and childcare needs. We surveyed a diverse cross-section of clinics representative of where women with childcare responsibilities seek healthcare, and thus may experience difficulties balancing these responsibilities with their own healthcare needs. Of note, our health system prohibits children younger than 13 unattended in clinical spaces, though variably implements these guidelines in the ambulatory clinics. There were unifying patterns amongst survey participant open-ended responses, specifically that affordable, convenient, and high-quality childcare is a need among our patient population and that safety and trust are top priorities when considering childcare. In addition, caretakers surveyed ranked health checkups and nutritional counseling for children, opportunities to meet staff, and extended social support for families as important factors in their decision to use childcare services. These secondary interventions may be introduced in the future in integrated and family-centered childcare centers, including through current interventions to deliver health system-integrated childcare services [36].

Our needs assessment suggested that white and Black women were more likely to delay healthcare in the past 12 months due to lack of childcare compared to Hispanic women. These differences may be attributable to increased collective family engagement in childcare responsibilities and cultural beliefs regarding childcare responsibilities among the Hispanic community [37, 38]. Previous social science research has demonstrated differences in the role of social support networks in childcare and family financial support across racial/ethnic groups [39,40,41]. Our observations are consistent with prior research in other disciplines examining cultural differences in values around childcare within the environment of healthcare delivery. These findings are integral for the design of culturally sensitive, patient-centered interventions to address childcare as a barrier to healthcare access. Additional research is needed to understand the cultural differences and intersectionality [42] that shape childcare barriers to healthcare.

Results should be interpreted within the context of our study limitations. This was a cross-sectional analysis of a pragmatic needs assessment; this survey was not designed to test for associations between childcare needs and patient factors. The survey was conducted in a single, safety-net health system, which may impact the generalizability of these findings. Limitations include patient recall bias when self-reporting delays in healthcare and the factors that impacted their ability to attend appointments. Response bias, particularly when responding to childcare center utilization, may have also been present as the survey was directly administered by the researchers. Notably, this needs assessment was administered in 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Since this survey was administered, we anticipate patients may have different childcare needs related to workforce changes after the pandemic [16], and enforcement of childcare policies in clinical spaces have intensified. These factors may affect the current experience of childcare barriers in our health system. Strengths of our study include the high response rate and large number of respondents, and the inclusion of information regarding anticipated use and factors that would impact daycare center utilization. Another significant strength is the diverse patient sample reflective of our underserved safety-net patient population, a representative population for examining SDOH like childcare. Further studies are needed to understand the heterogeneity in childcare barriers in other vulnerable populations and the interaction of childcare needs alongside other SDOH.

Our study findings highlight the need for childcare policy reform as not only an economic imperative, but as a public health need. The challenges of childcare access in the United States has been consistently framed in terms of parental employment [43, 44], however these preliminary findings reinforce the public health implications of lack of access to childcare. Though there has been executive action to decrease costs of caregiving [45], federal legislation to increase access to childcare for low-income families remains pending [46]. Current advocacy efforts to increase access to childcare through childcare subsidies, tax credits, and Head Start and Early Head Start programs have centered on the impact of childcare on childhood development and parental workforce engagement [44, 47], however strengthening these programs could furthermore have important implications for the health of caregivers of children. Our findings of childcare needs presenting a barrier to healthcare access could support future childcare policy efforts by underscoring the benefits of childcare reform on public health as well as the labor market. Furthermore, these findings could suggest an opportunity for childcare needs addressed through healthcare system payment models (e.g., Medicaid transportation assistance [48]).

This study demonstrates that childcare is a commonly reported reason for delays in healthcare. While childcare needs may impact patients in our community more significantly than in others, the prevalence of the concern, regardless of race or work status, does support that childcare is a stressor which impacts healthcare access. In this population, the struggle to balance competing needs of one’s own healthcare and childcare responsibilities often pit these two needs directly against one another. What we found was sobering, but not unexpected. Women deprioritize their own healthcare to the more pressing need to provide childcare and reported that accessing childcare was more difficult than accessing healthcare. Future research is needed to investigate interventions to balance these competing needs, potentially through integrating childcare support in the healthcare setting.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy policies of our health system but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Syed ST, Gerber BS, Sharp LK. Traveling towards Disease: transportation barriers to Health Care Access. J Community Health. 2013;38(5):976–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaiyachati KH, Hubbard RA, Yeager A, et al. Association of Rideshare-Based Transportation Services and missed primary care appointments: a clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(3):383–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Work as a Key Social Determinant of Health: The Case for Including Work in All Health Data Collections. CDC Blogs. Published February 16, 2023. Accessed June 30. 2023. https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2023/02/16/sdoh/

  4. Tolbert J, Drake P, Dec 19 ADP. 2022. Key Facts about the Uninsured Population. KFF. Published December 19, 2022. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.kff.org/uninsured/issue-brief/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/

  5. Abraham P, Bishay AE, Farah I, Williams E, Tamayo-Murillo D, Newton IG. Reducing Health disparities in Radiology through Social determinants of Health: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Radiol. 2021;28(7):903–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler NE, Glymour MM, Fielding J. Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities. JAMA. 2016;316(16):1641–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.14058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson LM, O’Meara ES, Haas JS, et al. The Role of Social Determinants of Health in Self-reported Access to Health Care among women undergoing screening mammography. J Women’s Health. 2020;29(11):1437–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.8267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Angus JE, Lombardo AP, Lowndes RH, Cechetto N, Ahmad F, Bierman AS. Beyond barriers in studying disparities in women’s access to health services in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative metasynthesis. Qual Health Res. 2013;23(4):476–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312469464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheila Rustgi MM, Doty SR, Collins. Women at Risk: Why Many Women Are Forgoing Needed Health Care. The Commonwealth Fund. Published May 11, 2009. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2009/may/women-risk-why-many-women-are-forgoing-needed-health-care

  10. Ranji U, Rosenzweig C, Gomez I. 2018. Overview: 2017 Kaiser Women’s Health Survey. KFF. Published March 13, 2018. Accessed February 22, 2023. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/overview-2017-kaiser-womens-health-survey/

  11. Why the majority of the world’s poor are women. Oxfam International. Published May 25. 2022. Accessed June 30, 2023. https://www.oxfam.org/en/why-majority-worlds-poor-are-women

  12. Ae-Kyung Jung, Karen M, O’Brien. The Profound influence of unpaid work on women’s lives: an overview and future directions. J Career Dev. 2017;46(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317734648

  13. Wezerek G, Ghodsee KR. Opinion: Women’s Unpaid Labor is Worth $10,900,000,000,000. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/04/opinion/women-unpaid-labor.html. Published March 5, 2020. Accessed August 22, 2023.

  14. Stall NM, Shah NR, Bhushan D. Unpaid family caregiving—the Next Frontier of gender equity in a Postpandemic Future. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(6):e231310. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandstrom H, Chaudry A. You have to choose your childcare to fit your work’: Childcare decision-making among low-income working families. J Child Poverty. 2012;18(2):89–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2012.710480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Petts RJ, Carlson DL, Pepin JR. A gendered pandemic: Childcare, homeschooling, and parents’ employment during COVID-19. Gend Work Organ. 2021;28(S2):515–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Workman S. Katie Hamm. 6 State Strategies To Improve Child Care Policies During the Pandemic and Beyond.; 2020. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/6-state-strategies-improve-child-care-policies-pandemic-beyond/

  18. Rasheed Malik K, Hamm L. Schochet. America’s Child Care Deserts in 2018.; 2018. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://childcaredeserts.org/

  19. Head Start and Early Head Start. ChildCare.gov. Accessed May 14. 2024. https://childcare.gov/consumer-education/head-start-and-early-head-start

  20. Guettler J. Insights into Head Start Enrollment Barriers. Start Early. Published October 25, 2023. Accessed May 14, 2024. https://www.startearly.org/post/insights-into-head-start-enrollment-barriers/

  21. Starbird LE, DiMaina C, Sun CA, Han HR. A systematic review of interventions to minimize transportation barriers among people with chronic diseases. J Community Health. 2019;44(2):400–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-018-0572-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Solomon EM, Wing H, Steiner JF, Gottlieb LM. Impact of Transportation Interventions on Health Care outcomes: a systematic review. Med Care. 2020;58(4):384–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hargraves JL, Hadley J. The contribution of Insurance Coverage and Community resources to reducing Racial/Ethnic disparities in Access to Care. Health Serv Res. 2003;38(3):809–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sommers BD, Gunja MZ, Finegold K, Musco T. Changes in self-reported Insurance Coverage, Access to Care, and Health under the Affordable Care Act. JAMA. 2015;314(4):366–74. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.8421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, et al. Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: perceptions of health care providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0431-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Heaman MI, Sword W, Elliott L, et al. Perceptions of barriers, facilitators and motivators related to use of prenatal care: a qualitative descriptive study of inner-city women in Winnipeg, Canada. SAGE Open Med. 2015;3:2050312115621314. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312115621314

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Beavis AL, Sanneh A, Stone RL, et al. Basic social resource needs screening in the gynecologic oncology clinic: a quality improvement initiative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):735e. 1-735.e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Freedman RA, Revette AC, Hershman DL, et al. Understanding breast Cancer knowledge and barriers to treatment adherence: a qualitative study among breast Cancer survivors. BioResearch Open Access. 2017;6(1):159–68. https://doi.org/10.1089/biores.2017.0028

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Alcaraz KI, Wiedt TL, Daniels EC, Yabroff KR, Guerra CE, Wender RC. Understanding and addressing social determinants to advance cancer health equity in the United States: a blueprint for practice, research, and policy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):31–46. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chatterjee A, Yu EJ, Tishberg L. Exploring opioid use disorder, its impact, and treatment among individuals experiencing homelessness as part of a family. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;188:161–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.04.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. King Z, Kramer C, Latkin C, Sufrin C. Access to treatment for pregnant incarcerated people with opioid use disorder: perspectives from community opioid treatment providers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;126:108338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Elise Gould, Lea JE, Austin. Marcy Whitebook. What does good child care reform look like? Economic Policy Institute. Published March 29, 2017. Accessed August 22, 2023. https://www.epi.org/publication/what-does-good-child-care-reform-look-like/

  33. Laurie Zephyrin L, Suennen P, Viswanathan J, Augenstein DB. Transforming Primary Health Care for Women, Part 1: A Framework. The Commonwealth Fund. Accessed September 9, 2022. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2020/jul/transforming-primary-health-care-women-part-1-framework

  34. Child Supervision. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Accessed May 9. 2024. https://www.dfps.texas.gov/child_protection/child_safety/child_supervision.asp

  35. Dallas County Community Health Needs Assessment. Community Health Needs Assessment. Published 2022. Accessed February 26. 2023. https://www.dallascounty.org/departments/dchhs/community-health-needs-assessment.php

  36. Alvarez KS, Bhavan K, Mathew S, et al. Addressing childcare as a barrier to healthcare access through community partnerships in a large public health system. BMJ Open Qual. 2022;11(4):e001964. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001964

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Fram MS, Kim J. Race/ethnicity and the start of child care: a multi-level analysis of factors influencing first child care experiences. Early Child Res Q. 2008;23(4):575–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yesil-Dagli U. Center-based childcare use by hispanic families: reasons and predictors. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(7):1298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hogan DP, Hao LX, Parish WL, Race. Kin Networks, and assistance to mother-headed Families*. Soc Forces. 1990;68(3):797–812. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/68.3.797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Radey M, Brewster KL. The influence of race/ethnicity on disadvantaged mothers’ child care arrangements. Early Child Res Q. 2007;22(3):379–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shlay AB. African American, White and hispanic child care preferences: a factorial survey analysis of welfare leavers by race and ethnicity. Soc Sci Res. 2010;39(1):125–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cassese EC, Barnes TD. Intersectional motherhood: investigating public support for child care subsidies*. Politics Groups Identities. 2019;7(4):775–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2018.1441035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Don Beyer. We Need to Save Child Care Before It’s Too Late, U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee Accessed. August 22, 2023. https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/4fefb596-1095-4c9b-8239-6a6c71563948/child-care-final-9.23.2020.pdf

  44. Feyman Y, Fener NE, Griffith KN. Association of Childcare Facility Closures with Employment Status of US women vs men during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Health Forum. 2021;2(6):e211297. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1297

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shear MD, Biden Signs Executive Order That Aims to Make Child Care Cheaper. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/18/us/politics/biden-executive-order-child-care.html. Published April 18, 2023. Accessed August 22, 2023.

  46. Rep. DeLauro RL [D C 3. H.R.7027–116th Congress (2019–2020): Child Care Is Essential Act. Published July 30, 2020. Accessed August 22, 2023. http://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/7027

  47. Hotz VJ, Wiswall M. Child Care and Child Care Policy: existing policies, their effects, and reforms. ANNALS Am Acad Political Social Sci. 2019;686(1):310–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219884078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ganuza A, Davis R. Disruptive Innovation in Medicaid Non-emergency Transportation. Center for Health Care Strategies, Inc.; 2017.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sheryl Mathew, LCSW, for social work expertise in navigating social determinants of health in access to care.

Funding

This work was supported by the Lowe Foundation Center for Women’s Preventative Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PG and AG contributed equally to this manuscript. PG contributed to study conceptualization, survey design, led survey data collection, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. AG analyzed and interpreted the survey data and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. MK contributed to survey data collection and interim analysis of the survey data. RM provided analytic oversight and contributed to manuscript revision. KA provided operational expertise about childcare barriers to appointments and contributed to manuscript revision. KB championed the project within institutional leadership and contributed to writing the manuscript. KK conceptualized the study, led survey design and validation, oversaw data collection, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anisha P. Ganguly.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was designated as exempt status by the University of Texas Southwestern Institutional Review Board (IRB) following review of study protocol STU-2019-0595.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaur, P., Ganguly, A.P., Kuo, M. et al. Childcare needs as a barrier to healthcare among women in a safety-net health system. BMC Public Health 24, 1608 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19125-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19125-1

Keywords