Skip to main content
Download PDF

Knowledge level and constructs of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to the practice of unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers attending Mkonze health center, Dodoma Region, Tanzania

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 1427 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Unsafe abortion is now a global agenda because 45% of all global abortions are unsafe, and 97% are occurring in developing countries. In Tanzania, one million reproductive-aged women face unplanned pregnancies per year, and 39% end up with abortion. About 16% of maternal deaths are reported per year in Tanzania, and unsafe abortion takes the second position. There are several efforts to prevent and intervene unsafe abortions, such as equipping healthcare facilities across all levels of healthcare, approval of Misoprostol use, establishment of comprehensive post-abortion care (PAC), revising policy guidelines and standards, provision of emergency contraceptives, and capacity building of healthcare providers. There is little documentation about how the constructs of the theory of planned behaviour, knowledge, and sociodemographics influence the practice of abortion.

Objectives

To assess the association of knowledge level, sociodemographic characteristics, and constructs of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to the practice of unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at Mkonze Health Center in the Dodoma region.

Methodology

It is an analytical cross-sectional study design conducted in Dodoma-Tanzania and involved 206 postnatal women. A validated questionnaire was used and analysis was performed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), through descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results

The practice of unsafe abortion in the current study is 28/206 (13.6%), influenced bytheir lower educational level and being single women. It was found that the majority had adequate knowledge of unsafe abortion 129 (62.6%), positive attitude 130 (63.1%), good subjective norms 113 (54.9%), and positive perceived behavioral control111 (53.9%). Knowledge, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control were not significantly associated with the practice of unsafe abortion.

Conclusion

The majority of the respondents had high knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavior control on unsafe abortion. This is an indicator that the implemented initiatives are effective. Maintaining the ongoing effort and improving strategies are promising to mitigate the burden of unsafe abortion. Future research needs to find out hidden factors associated with attitude and how health beliefs might influence someone’s attitude towards unsafe abortion.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Abortion is a global issue that has been taking the attention of different cultures, religions, and social, psychological, and country laws [1]. Abortion has become a major issue across the country’s boundaries whereby some countries’ policies accept it in special scenarios such as life-threatening conditions and emergencies while others such as United States and Canada allow women to abort depending on their reasons such as medical, psychology, rape, financial hardship, incest, and fetal abnormalities [2]. Out of 210 million pregnancies per year, 46 million pregnancies end in abortion [3].

Unsafe abortion is now a global agenda because 45% of all global abortions are unsafe, with 97% occurring in developing countries and 3% in developed countries [4]. Out of 55.7 million abortions that occurred globally between 2010 and 2014, 25.1 million of these were unsafe every year [5]. It is approximated that there are 20 million unsafe abortions annually and one out of 250 end to death and maternal disabilities [6]. This is supported by another study reporting that 13% of unsafe abortions end in maternal death each year [7]. While a huge burden of unsafe abortion is in Sub-Saharan countries, East Africa accounts for 75% of unsafe abortions [8].

Different reasons contribute to the decision of unsafe abortion among many women and adolescent girls, including unpreparedness for pregnancy, poor access to contraceptives, education level, and sexual education, economic issue, rape, marital status, victim of incest, support from partner and parents, society norms, religion, stigma, health care system and laws of the countries [9]. All these have contributed to unsafe abortion among women in countries where there is no accessibility of safe abortion due to restrictive laws of abortion [10]. The rate of unsafe abortion is increasing proportionally especially in restrictive countries due to the influence of demographics, low community awareness, socioeconomic and cultural factors such as financial issues, and peer groups, to continue their education, secure their future aspiration, relationship status, stigma, risk measuring, and availability and accessibility of methods of abortion such as misoprostol [11]. According to research done in Zambia, 77 women out of 362 had unsafe abortions whereby most of them fall into the group of unmarried, living in high density, having a history of unplanned pregnancy and a history of miscarriage [12]. Generally, the higher proportions of unsafe abortion are confined to countries with highly restrictive abortion laws [13, 14], and countries with difficulty accessing health facilities [15]. Abortion is the termination or expulsion of the fetus before 20 weeks of gestation [16]. Abortion can be spontaneous or induced, whereby it is induced abortion when there is termination of unwanted pregnancy by use of external methods (medically or by dilation and curettage) [17]. On the other side, spontaneous abortion refers to a miscarriage or purely accidental abortion [18]. When the abortion is carried out using a method recommended by WHO, appropriate to the pregnancy duration, and by someone with the necessary skills, it is considered a safe abortion [19]. Meanwhile, unsafe abortion refers to a procedure of pregnancy termination either by persons lacking the necessary skills or in an environment that does not conform to minimal medical standards or both [7].

In Tanzania, one million reproductive-aged women face unplanned pregnancies per year, and 39% end up with abortion [20]. About 16% of maternal deaths are reported per year in Tanzania, and unsafe abortion takes the second position [21]. Several efforts are observed in Tanzania to combat unsafe abortion by improving post-abortion care and provision of emergency contraceptives and safe abortion services to women underwent incest and rape [8]. In addition, the efforts of tackling unsafe abortion in the country have been through identification and prioritizing unsafe abortion services to zones with the highest rates of abortion, promotion of men’s involvement in family planning, equipping healthcare facilities across all levels of the healthcare system to provide basic post-abortion care, implementation of national Road Map Strategic Plan, approval of Misoprostol, and building on a comprehensive post-abortion care (PAC) training program [22]. Moreover, there have been new and revised policy guidelines and standards to guide the extension of post-abortion care, capacity building of healthcare providers, developing networks, and platforms to promote understanding of abortion issues [23]. It is reported that one-third of hospital admissions due to pregnancy complications are due to unsafe abortion while one-quarter lead to maternal death [20]. Unsafe abortion in Tanzania is due to unintended pregnancy and inaccessibility of contraceptives [24]. Most studies in Tanzania regarding abortion have focused on incidence, abortion-seeking practices, and service delivery [21]. There is little documentation about how the constructs of the theory of planned behavior and knowledge influence abortion practice. Therefore, the study aimed to assess the association of knowledge level, sociodemographic characteristics, and constructs of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to the practice of unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at the Mkonze health center in Dodoma region.

The theory of planned behavior (TPB) which is a cognitive theory by Azjen (1985), states that an individual’s decision to engage in a specific behavior can be predicated by their intention to engage in that behaviour [25]. The theory has four constructs; attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and intention [26]. The specific objectives of this study are; ① To determine the knowledge about unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at Mkonze health center in Dodoma regional ② To assess the attitude towards unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at Mkonze health center in Dodoma regional ③ To predict subjective norms leading to unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at Mkonze health center in Dodoma regional ④ To determine perceived behavior control about unsafe abortion among postnatal mother at Mkonze health center in Dodoma regional and ⑤ To evaluate the intention practice towards unsafe abortion among postnatal mother at Mkonze health center in Dodoma regional.

Methods

Study design

An analytical cross-sectional study design was employed to use the construsts of the theory of planned behavior and knowledge to assess the intentional practice of unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers at the Mkonze health center in Dodoma region.

Study area

The study was carried out in Dodoma City at Mkonze Health Center. Dodoma city was chosen as the study area because it has the highest magnitude of teenage pregnancies (29–39%) compared to other regions of Tanzania [27, 28]. Moreover, it is a marked region with relatively low utilization of contraceptives [29].

Study population

The study population included all postnatal women attending or admitted to Mkonze Health Centre. Participants were excluded if had sickness to impair their responses, could not comprehend the instructions, and were not willing to participate because of self-reported tiredness and busy.

Sample size calculation and sampling technique

Sample size calculation

The sample size was calculated using the sample size formula:

n = (Z² * P * (1 - P)) / E².

Where:

n = Sample size,

Z = Standard normal deviation (for a 95% confidence interval, Z = 1.96),

P = Proportion of target population. The prevalence of 16% for unsafe abortion in Tanzania [22].

E = Marginal error on the quantity to be estimated (5%).

Therefore, the calculated sample size was 206.

Sampling technique

Probability sampling especially systematic random sampling was used in the study. The postnatal ward at the health center had a daily recorded number of admitted postnatal women in the register. The required number of participants per day was 6 postnatal women, therefore, the nth number was calculated by dividing the number of required postnatal women over the total admitted number of postnatal women of a particular day. The participants were then selected at the interval of the nth number in the register.

Data collection procedure and data collection tools

Data were collected from Mkonze Health Centre from 25th May to 30th June 2023 by a principal investigator with an assistant. The questionnaire which was used in the data collection was developed and validated by a principal investigator. The development started with a literature review to identify items for each variable, followed by content validity where the experts were invited to rate how well was the tool. The tool was pre-tested to 20% of the actual sample size, and internal consistent reliability was determined. Through principal component analysis (PCA), the weak items were modified, making the final tool to have consisted six parts, (1) socio-demographic information, (2) attitude (3) practice (4) knowledge (5) perceived behavior control, and (6) subjective norms among postnatal mothers. Different parts contained varying numbers of items related to the study’s context. For instance, the practice toward unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers was assessed using 8 questions, with response 1 for Yes and 2 for No, the knowledge toward unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers was assessed using 13 questions having responses of 1-Yes and 2-No.Attitude toward unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers was assessed using five items on a 5-Likert scale (1-strongly disagree,2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, 5-strongly agree). The higher the score (strongly agree) the more positive attitude of the participants. Subjective norms toward unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers were assessed using five items having a response of 1 for Yes and 2 for No. Participants who responded as “Yes” in each item, were considered to get the correct answer. Perceived behavior control toward unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers was assessed using three items 5-Likert scale (1-strongly disagree, 2-disagree, 3-neutral, 4-agree, and 5-strongly agree). The increased number indicates a correct answer, with the maximum (strongly agree).

The questionnaire was translated from English to Swahili’s native language for the convenience of participants.

Data analysis

Regarding measures and data processing, knowledge, subjective norms, and practices of unsafe abortion were measured through binary responses of Yes/No, but attitude and perceived behavioral control were measured through a 5-Likert scale. In each variable, the average of items were computed and the scores were categorized. The cut-off point for each variable was 50%, the above 50%, the higher score, and vice versa.Data were entered and analyzed in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Descriptive statistics summarize the data in the form of frequency, percentage, and mean. A cross-tabulation was carried out to look association between sociodemographic data and factors. A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Social demographic characteristics of the respondents

The study recruited 206 postnatal women in the study. The majority of the respondents 56 (27.2%) were aged 25–29 followed by 52 (25.2%) aged 30–34. It was found that 159 (77.2%) of participants lived in urban areas. The participants were married 133 (64.6%), single 33 (16.0%), divorced 28 (13.6%), and windowed 12 (5.8%). Regarding the occupation, participants were entrepreneurs 82 (39.8%), peasant 67 (32.5%), employed 32 (15.5%), and housewife 25 (12.1%). Regarding the education status of the respondents, they had a primary level of education of 92 (44.7%), secondary level education of 54 (26.2%) college or university 23 (11.2%), and never attended school 37 (18%). Refer to Table 1.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents
Full size table

The practice of unsafe abortion among the participants

The majority of the participants about two-thirds seemed not to have had an abortion in the course of their lives 161 (78.2%) and those who had abortions were about one-third 45 (21.8%) of the total participants. Of those who had abortions, 17 (38%) had safe abortions and 28 (62.2%) had an unsafe abortion. Therefore, the practice of unsafe abortion in the current study is 28/206 (13.6%). The highly useful method for unsafe was medication 89 (43.2%) and home remedies 84 (40.8%). Three-quarters did not practice unsafe abortion in the past two years 177 (85.9%) and those who practiced it were 29 (14.1%). Reasons for unsafe abortion are highly due to the advice from friends and parents 129 (62.6%), rape 97 (47.1%) pregnancies rejected by their partners 89 (43.1%), and those in need to continue with studies 88 (42.7%). From those who practiced unsafe abortion, the high frequency of having an unsafe abortion was once in a life lifetime 26 (12.6%). Refer to Table 2. A total score was computed whereas a score above 4 was regarded as good practice toward unsafe abortion and a score below 4 was regarded as poor practice toward unsafe abortion. By summing up the scores of practices, it was found that the majority of participants had practiced unsafe abortion 147 (71.4%) and 59 (28.6%) had practiced safe abortion.

Table 2 Practices of abortion among study participants
Full size table

Knowledge of unsafe abortion among participants

Most of the participants had heard of safe 150 (72.8%), and unsafe abortion 150 (72.8%). Participants agreed that unsafe abortion is a problem in our current society 116 (56.3%). Regarding the source of information on unsafe abortion, most of the participants got information through friends 132 (64.1%), social media 116 (56.3%), health professionals 112 (54.4%), and relatives/family 114 (55.3%). It was found that 158 (76.6%) of participants had never experienced unwanted pregnancy in their lives and further responded that in case they become pregnant unwillingly they would continue and give birth 176 (85.4%). Most women knew the gestation age when abortion is unsafe to be 3 months of pregnancy 126 (61.2%). On the signs and symptoms of unsafe abortion, participants agree that the following are signs and symptoms of unsafe abortion; abdominal pain 148 (71.8%), vaginal infection 152 (73.8%), vaginal bleeding 165 (80.1%), shock 149 (72.3%), and heavy bleeding 151 (73.3%). Participants mentioned that unsafe abortion has complications 157 (66.5%) like infertility 142 (68.9%) and future pregnancy problem 133 (64.6%). The majority knew that abortion is illegal in Tanzania 151 (73.3%) and agreed with the presence of home remedies used in abortion 133 (64.6%) but reported that the use of home remedies for abortion is not safe 154 (74.8%). Refer to Table 3. A total score was computed whereas a score above 7 was regarded as adequate knowledge toward unsafe abortion and a score below 7 was regarded as inadequate knowledge toward unsafe abortion. The summation of the total score was performed to categorize variables into adequate and inadequate knowledge. Finally, the majority of the participants had adequate knowledge of unsafe abortion 129 (62.6%) and the rest had inadequate knowledge 77 (37.4%). Refer to Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Knowledge level of unsafe abortion among study participants

Full size image
Table 3 Knowledge of unsafe abortion among participants
Full size table

The association between sociodemographic and knowledge level of participants

Only age was significantly associated with the knowledge of participants, such that respondents of 30–34 had adequate knowledge of safe abortion compared to other age groups (χ2 = 12.897; P = 0.024). Other sociodemographic characteristics were not significantly associated with knowledge level; place of residence (χ2 = 2.313; P = 0.128), marital status (χ2 = 2.248; P = 0.522), occupation (χ2 = 3.704; P = 0.295), and education level (χ2 = 0.130; P = 0.988). Refer to Table 4.

Table 4 Association between sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge level among respondents
Full size table

The association knowledge level and practice of unsafe abortion

Among postnatal women who had adequate knowledge, 94 (72.9%) had unsafe abortion. While, those who had inadequate knowledge, 53 (68.8%) had unsafe abortions. Generally, the result has shown that there was no significant association between knowledge level and practice of unsafe abortion (χ2 = 0.385; P = 0.535).

Attitudes toward unsafe abortion among participants

Participants strongly agreed on the following items; unsafe abortion is an unhealthy procedure for a woman 101 (49%), and unsafe abortion can cause complications to a woman 91 (44.2%). The remaining three items indicate that the majority of participants agreed; that unsafe abortion can cause death to a woman 66 (32%), unsafe abortion can lead to sepsis to a woman 68 (33%), and unsafe abortion is a bad thing 75 (36.4%). Refer to Table 5. A total score was computed whereas a score above 10 was a positive attitude toward unsafe abortion while a score below 10 was regarded as a negative attitude toward unsafe abortion. The majority of participants, 130 (63.1%) had positive attitudes toward unsafe abortion compared to those with negative attitudes 76 (36.9%). Refer to Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Attitude towards unsafe abortion among study participants

Full size image
Table 5 Attitude on unsafe abortion among study participants
Full size table

The association between sociodemographics and the attitude of participants

None of the sociodemographic characteristics was significantly associated with attitude towards unsafe abortion among participants; age group (χ2 = 10.216; P = 0.069), place of residence (χ2 = 2.571; P = 0.109), marital status (χ2 = 4.801; P = 0.187), Occupation (χ2 = 2.453; P = 0.484), and education level (χ2 = 2.853; P = 0.415). Refer to Table 6.

Table 6 The association between sociodemographics and attitude of participants
Full size table

The association attitude and practice of unsafe abortion

The results show that the attitude towards unsafe abortion was not significantly associated with the practice χ2 = 1.066;P = 0.302.

Subjective norms towards unsafe abortion

Participants answered correctly on the following items: in your family and society is unsafe abortion viewed as a sin 123 (59.7%), When someone is known she had an abortion she is viewed as a killer 129 (62.6%), and when someone is known she had an abortion she is viewed as bad person 120 (58.3%). However, in two items, participants were incorrectly; when someone is known she had an abortion should be stigmatized 118 (57.3%) and do social norms a source of information about unsafe abortion 113 (54.9%). Refer to Table 7. A total score was computed whereas a score above 2 was regarded as good subjective norms toward unsafe abortion while a score below 2 was regarded as poor subjective norms. Through summation of scores, 113 (54.9%) had good subjective norms compared to 93 (45%) who had poor subjective norms. Refer to Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subjective norms towards unsafe abortion among study participants

Full size image
Table 7 Subjective norms on unsafe abortion among study participants
Full size table

The association between sociodemographic and subjective norms of participants

There were no sociodemographic characteristics significantly associated with subjective norms towards unsafe abortion; age group (χ2 = 3.732; P = 0.589), place of residence (χ2 = 3.031; P = 0.082), marital status (χ2 = 3.175; P = 0.365), occupation (χ2 = 7.749; P = 0.051), and education level (χ2 = 6.190; P = 0.103). Refer to Table 8.

Table 8 The association between sociodemographics and subjective norms of participants
Full size table

The association of subjective norms and the practice of unsafe abortion

Among participants with good subjective norms, 65 (69.9%) had unsafe abortion. Those who had poor subjective norms, 82 (72.6%) had unsafe abortions. Generally, the results indicate that subjective norms towards unsafe abortion were not significantly associated with the practice (χ2 = 0.178;P = 0.673).

Perceived behavioral control

Participants agreed on items stating that I cannot practice unsafe abortion because it is illegal in Tanzania 70 (34%) while many participants 58 (28.2%) disagreed on the item “I’m confident that I cannot practice unsafe abortion”. Participants were neutral 54 (26.2%) and others agreed 54 (26.2%) when responding to the item “Regardless I get unwanted pregnancy I cannot practice unsafe abortion”. Refer to Table 9. A total score was computed whereas a score above 6 was regarded as positive perceived behavior control toward unsafe abortion and a score below 6 was regarded as negative perceived behavior control toward unsafe abortion. After the summation of all scores, most of the participants 111 (53.9%) had positive perceived behavioral control while 95 (46.1%) had negative perceived behavioral control.

Table 9 Perceived behavior control on unsafe abortion among study participants
Full size table

The association between sociodemographic and perceived behavioral control of participants

It was found that none of the sociodemographic characteristics of participants was significantly associated with perceived behavioral control; age group (χ2 = 5.849; P = 0.321), place of residence (χ2 = 2.075; P = 0.15), marital status (χ2 = 2.595; P = 0.458), occupation (χ2 = 5.384; P = 0.146), and education level (χ2 = 3.905; P = 0.272). Refer to Table 10.

Table 10 The association between sociodemographic and perceived behavioral control of participants
Full size table

The association of perceived behavioral control and practice of unsafe abortion

The results show that perceived behavioral control towards unsafe abortion was not significantly associated with the practice χ2 = 0.466; P = 0.495).

The association of sociodemographic characteristics and practice of abortion

The result indicates that only two sociodemographic characteristics (Marital status and educational level) were significantly associated with the safe abortion. In such a way respondents who were divorced had high good practice 16 (57.1%) compared to other participants who belonged to other marital statuses (χ2 = 13.515; P = 0.004) and participants who had secondary educational level had safe abortion 73 (79.3%) than other participants with different educational levels (χ2 = 10.146; P = 0.017). Other sociodemographic characteristics were significantly association with safe abortion; age (χ2 = 8.751P = 0.119), place of residence (χ2 = 0.029; P = 0.866), and occupation (χ2 = 4.663; P = 0.198). Refer to Table 11.

Table 11 The association of sociodemographic characteristics and practice of unsafe abortion
Full size table

Interaction of knowledge, attitude, and perceived behavioral control

Knowledge level of unsafe abortion was not significantly associated with attitude (χ2 = 3.657; P = 0.056). Refer to Supplementary Table (1) In the same way, there was no significant association between knowledge level and perceived behavioral control (χ2 = 3.537; P = 0.06). Refer to Supplementary Table (2) Meanwhile, there was a significant association between attitude and perceived behavioral control in such a way that 61 (55%) participants who had a positive attitude towards unsafe abortion had positive perceived behavioral control (χ2 = 3.657; P = 0.056). Refer to supplement Table 3.

Discussion

Knowledge of unsafe abortion among the participants

The current study found that most of the participants 129 (62.6%) had adequate knowledge of unsafe abortion. This indicates the effectiveness of the ongoing national approaches for promoting public understanding of unsafe abortion. Further, it is because the majority were aged 30–34 and probably had been exposed to previous health education from antenatal care visits. The adequate knowledge of unsafe abortion (91%) is also reported in the previous study [30].

Attitude on unsafe abortion among participants

In this study, two-thirds of the participants 130 (63.1%) had positive attitudes. health beliefs (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits) might be a reason for a positive attitude. For instance, when a woman feels susceptible to sepsis after an unsafe abortion might help her to avoid practicing unsafe abortion. Same way, the woman will avoid unsafe abortion if believes that she may end up with complications and unfertile. The previous study supports that health beliefs influence attitude [31]. Moreover, another study pinpoints that health beliefs and attitudes have a significant association with lifestyle change and risks in primary care [32].

Subjective norms on unsafe abortion among participants

From the results of our study, most participants had good subjective norms toward unsafe abortion 113 (54.9%) because the participants encounter pressure from a society that considers unsafe abortion sin, the doer of unsafe abortion as a killer, and anyone involved in unsafe abortion needs to be stigmatized. The finding is aligned with previous findings by Connell [33].

Perceived behavior control among participants

From the results of our study, the majority 111 (53.9%) had positive perceived behavior control, which has been influenced by the positive attitude participants possessed. It is surprising to find out that the current study finding is contrary to the theory of planned behaviour since the theory is silent on whether attitude influences perceived behavioral control.

The practice of unsafe abortion among participants

Most participants 147 (71.4%) were found to practice unsafe abortion due to marital status and educational level. Since most of the participants in this study were single women and abortion in Tanzania is illegal, if a single woman becomes pregnant while still having a plan to develop a career, unsafe abortion is the alternative. Meanwhile, if a single woman becomes pregnant but the pregnancy is rejected by a partner, this triggers the woman to perform an unsafe abortion. Regarding education level, participants with lower educational levels or those who have never attended the school practice unsafe abortion. The school is the place with health clubs, teaching, and guiding students in all health-related matters with unsafe abortion inclusively. The more a woman advances her education level, the more she is exposed to teachings on unsafe abortion. Out of health clubs, the curriculum may contain courses with the content of unsafe abortion. The finding is consistent with the previous study reported that unsafe abortion is higher among less educated women [34].

Study limitation

The study was carried out in a single region of Tanzania and at a single healthcare facility which may limit the generalization of the current findings. It seems that most of the important factors for unsafe abortion were left out as none of the independent variables in the current study were significantly associated with the practice of unsafe abortion.

Conclusion

Most of the respondents had high knowledge, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavior control on unsafe abortion. This is an indicator that the implemented initiatives are effective. Maintaining the ongoing effort and improving strategies are promising to mitigate the burden of unsafe abortion. Future research needs to find out hidden factors associated with attitude and how health beliefs might influence someone’s attitude towards unsafe abortion. Even though the theory does not support the attitude to influence perceived behavioral control, extensive studies need to be conducted to confirm the association between these two variables.

Data availability

The data set and other supplementary documents are available upon request. Point of contact, Dr. Joanes Faustine Mboineki, Email: 624639045@qq.com, Mobile number: +255756310634.

References

  1. Saeed S, Jain S, Emma N, Afzali H, Razaqi N, Yousufi M, et al. Knowledge and attitude towards abortion among women in Afghanistan. Razi Int Med J. 2022;2:52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sitaula S, Basnet T, Agrawal A, Manandhar T, Das D, Shrestha P. Prevalence and risk factors for maternal mortality at a tertiary care centre in Eastern Nepal – retrospective cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;:1–8.

  3. Mukanga B, Daka V, Mulenga D, Knowledge, attitude and practice towards unsafe abortions among tertiary education female students in KITWE., ZAMBIA. 2020; January.

  4. World Health Organization. Abortion: Key facts. World Health Organization. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion. Accessed 26 Aug 2023.

  5. Ganatra B, Gerdts C, Rossier C, Ronald B Jr, Tunçalp J et al. Ö,. Global, regional, and subregional classification of abortions by safety, 2010–14 : estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. 2017;390.

  6. Ermeko T, Knowledge. Attitude and practice on unsafe abortion among female students in Batu Terara Preparatory School Goba Town. Southeast Ethiopia. 2018;9:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gebremedhin M, Semahegn A, Usmael T, Tesfaye G. Unsafe abortion and associated factors among reproductive aged women in Sub-saharan Africa: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Syst Reviews. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0775-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Namagembe I, Nakimuli A, Byamugisha J, Moffett A, Bchir MB, Aiken A, et al. Preventing death following unsafe abortion: a case series from urban Uganda. AJOG Global Rep. 2022;2:100039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cresswell JA, Schroeder R, Dennis M, Owolabi O, Vwalika B, Musheke M et al. Women ’ s knowledge and attitudes surrounding abortion in Zambia: a cross-sectional survey across three provinces. 2016;:1–10.

  10. Loi UR, Lindgren M, Faxelid E, Oguttu M, Klingberg-allvin M. Decision-making preceding induced abortion: a qualitative study of women ’ s experiences in Kisumu. Kenya. 2018;:1–12.

  11. Lokubal P, Corcuera I, Balil M, Frischer R, Kayemba N. Articles Abortion decision-making process trajectories and determinants in low- and middle-income countries: a mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;54:101694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chavkin W, Baffoe P, Awoonor-williams K, Bank U. Implementing safe abortion in Ghana: we must tell our story and tell it well. Table 1. 2018;143:25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faundes A, Comendant R, Dilbaz B, Jaldesa G, Leke R, Mukherjee B et al. Preventing unsafe abortion: Achievements and challenges of a global FIGO initiative. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2020;62 xxxx:101–12.

  14. Singh S. Hospital admissions resulting from unsafe abortion: estimates from 13 developing countries. Lancet. 2006;368:1887–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cioffi A, Cioffi F, Rinaldi R. Reflections about abortion limitation. Ciencia E Saude Coletiva. 2021;26:3787–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MIchelle Mouri H, Hall, Timothy J. Rupp. Threatened abortion: Continuing Education Activity. StatPearls [Internet]; 2022.

  17. Romano C, Bekele A. Assessment of Knowledge, attitude and practice towards the Use of Medication Abortion among female regular undergraduate students in Faculty of Health Science,. 2020;4:127–42.

  18. Zheng D, Li C, Wu T, Tang K. Factors associated with spontaneous abortion: a cross-sectional study of Chinese populations. Reproductive Health. 2017;14:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Orangization. Abortion: Key facts. World Health Orangization. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion. Accessed 13 Feb 2024.

  20. Center for Reproductive Rights. Open Secret: The Toll of Unsafe Abortion in Tanzania. 2020;:1–4.

  21. Sambaiga R, Haukanes H, Moland KM, Blystad A. Health, life and rights : a discourse analysis of a hybrid abortion regime in Tanzania. Int J Equity Health. 2019;18.

  22. Keogh SC, Kimaro G, Muganyizi P, Philbin J, Kahwa A, Ngadaya E, et al. Incidence of Induced Abortion and Post-abortion Care in Tanzania. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133933.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mutashobya G, Shingale M, Garfinkel D, Agarwal A. Transforming Postabortion and Comprehensive Abortion Care in Zanzibar: Lessons Learned from EngenderHealth’s Expanding Access to Postabortion Care Project in Tanzania. Washington, DC; 2022.

  24. Guttmacher. Unsafe Abortion Is Common In Tanzania and Is A Major Cause of Maternal Death. Guttmacher. 2016. https://www.guttmacher.org/news-release/2016/unsafe-abortion-common-tanzania-and-major-cause-maternal-death. Accessed 26 Aug 2023.

  25. Elisabeth Brookes. The theory of Planned Behavior: behavioral intention. Simply Psychol. 2023;:438–59.

  26. Bosnjak M, Ajzen I, Schmidt P. The theory of planned behavior: selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s J Psychol. 2020;16:352–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Moshi FV, Tilisho O. The magnitude of teenage pregnancy and its associated factors among teenagers in Dodoma Tanzania: a community – based analytical cross – sectional study. Reproductive Health. 2023;20:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Munuo U, Moshi FV. Assessing motivators for utilizing family planning services among youth students in higher learning institutions in Dodoma, Tanzania: protocol for analytical cross sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(3 March):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kara WSK, Benedicto M, Mao J. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of Contraception methods among female undergraduates in Dodoma, Tanzania. Cureus. 2019;11.

  30. Bahadur R, Id K, Poudel S, Raj P, Id G. Factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal: pooled analysis of the 2011 and 2016 Nepal demographic and health surveys. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0223385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kim HY, Shin SH, Lee EH. Effects of Health Belief, Knowledge, and attitude toward COVID-19 on Prevention Behavior in Health College Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19.

  32. Mäntyselkä P, Kautiainen H, Miettola J. Beliefs and attitudes towards lifestyle change and risks in primary care - A community-based study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Connell KAO, Kebede AT, Menna BM, Woldetensay MT, Fischer SE, Samandari G, et al. Signs of a turning tide in social norms and attitudes toward abortion in Ethiopia: findings from a qualitative study in four regions. Reproductive Health. 2022;19:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Arambepola C, Rajapaksa LC, Attygalle D, Moonasinghe L. Relationship of family formation characteristics with unsafe abortion: is it confounded by women’s socio-economic status? - a case-control study from Sri Lanka. Reproductive Health. 2016;13:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge individual and organizational support received during the research process. We thank Dr Fabiola Moshi, for guidance, expertise, and continuous encouragement. We appreciate Maria Luambano and Irene Maina for their valuable assistance in enriching the depth of this research. The opinions and suggestions from Dr Stephen Kibusi were constructive and enabled the accomplishment of the study.

Funding

Authors received no research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nursing Management and Education, School of Nursing and Public Health, The University of Dodoma, P. O. Box 259, Dodoma, Tanzania

    Immaculata Alphonce Samila & Joanes Faustine Mboineki

Authors
  1. Immaculata Alphonce Samila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanes Faustine Mboineki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

IAS developed a protocol draft, collected data, performed the data analysis, and prepared the research report. JFM supervised the development of a protocol, determined the significance of the study, prepared the data collection tools, supervised the data analysis, and revised the prepared manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanes Faustine Mboineki.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of Dodoma research review committee. A written informed consent was obtained from each participant before their involvement. The informed consent of participants under 16 years of age was completed by their guardians on behalf of the participants. Moreover, legal guardians completed the informed consent for individuals with no formal education, who were considered incapable of providing informed consent for their participation. Clear instructions were given to participants, emphasizing voluntary participation and the option to withdraw at any time. Confidentiality was maintained, and the data obtained were stored securely by the researcher. The research was conducted based on the standard.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samila, I.A., Mboineki, J.F. Knowledge level and constructs of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) to the practice of unsafe abortion among postnatal mothers attending Mkonze health center, Dodoma Region, Tanzania. BMC Public Health 24, 1427 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18921-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18921-z

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us