Skip to main content

Longitudinal relationship between pre-exposure prophylaxis motivation and change in adherence among men who have sex with men in Western China

Abstract

Introduction

The efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly dependent on adherence, and adherence behavior is influenced by motivation. The aim of this study was to explore the longitudinal relationship between PrEP motivation and change in adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Western China.

Methods

From November 2019 to June 2021, we conducted a PrEP prospective cohort study. Motivation to take medicine was measured by the PrEP Motivation Scale at baseline, and was grouped into different levels of latent categories by Latent Profile Analysis (LPA). A multinomial logistic regression model was used to explore the longitudinal relationship between change in adherence (improvement, decline, no change) and different levels of PrEP motivation.

Results

MSM were divided into two categories of PrEP motivation, a “high motivation group” (n = 506, 69.89%) and a “low motivation group” (n = 218, 30.11%). High PrEP motivation had no significant effect on the change in short-term adherence, however, it contributed to the improvement in long-term adherence [odds ratio (OR) = 3.028 (1.100–8.332), p = 0.031]. The predictive power of the adherence model was significantly enhanced with the addition of the PrEP motivation factor.

Conclusions

There was a positive correlation between high PrEP motivation at baseline and an improvement in long-term adherence. Surveillance and intervention of PrEP motivation in MSM can increase their adherence, and then promote PrEP efficacy.

Peer Review reports

Background

Male-to-male human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission is rapidly increasing and constitutes more than 25% of all newly reported HIV cases in China [1, 2]. At the same time, men who have sex with men (MSM) had the highest HIV prevalence among all key populations. Significant differences in HIV disease burden among Chinese MSM compared to the general population [2]. According to the statistics, the national HIV prevalence among MSM was 6.9% [3]. The annual incidence of HIV among MSM in China was 5 cases per 100 person-years [4]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) as part of a comprehensive HIV prevention approach to prevent infection among MSM [5]. PrEP as a biomedical intervention has been shown to be effective in reducing HIV infection among MSM population [6, 7]. However, the success of PrEP at the population level depends heavily on individual adherence in the real-world settings. A previous study pointed out that improving MSM adherence was crucial to optimizing PrEP implementation programs [3]. Taken together, in order to effectively improve PrEP efficacy and reduce HIV transmission and prevalence, it is important to monitor and intervene early in the potential influencing factors of adherence among MSM population.

Motivation is the mental disposition or internal drive that inspires and sustains action. Previous study proposed a theoretical framework for predicting and explaining behavior, which explains how different levels of motivation regulate behavior [8]. Meanwhile, the forms of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation can also influence individual perception and behavior [9]. It is obvious that motivation is an inherent factor that causes people to develop certain behaviors or behavior change. With the emergence of more and more motivation-related studies, it is beneficial for researchers to understand and explain the relationship between motivation and behavior in greater depth, providing a theoretical basis for future behavioral guidance and management.

Currently, there have been several studies related to PrEP motivation. However, there were limited studies that focused on PrEP motivation and explored its impact on related behaviors (e.g., adherence). For example, a qualitative study assessed the motivation and interest of MSM in using PrEP in the future [10]. Another a phenomenological qualitative study showed that fear of HIV infection and the benefits of regular medical follow-up were important motivating factors for PrEP use among MSM [11]. In the study of the PrEP, the results provided insights into the relationship between motivation and PrEP intentions [12]. As we mentioned previously, motivation is an important factor influencing behavior. Most of these previous studies on PrEP motivation have been qualitative, with few studies quantitatively assessing specific relationships between PrEP motivation and adherence, and the quantitative studies lack longitudinal data and have limited ability to infer causal relationships. However, our study fills this part of the gap. The relationship between PrEP motivation and adherence in Chinese MSM needs to be further explored.

In addition, Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), as a person-centered approach, has been widely used in a number of fields, especially in psychological trait researches [13, 14]. This method allowed us to determine the heterogeneity of the study population by categorizing potential subgroups [15]. MSM in the same subgroup were homogenous, while MSM in different subgroups were heterogeneous. It could provide a better understanding of MSM population with different characteristics. LPA had the potential to develop tailored interventions for subgroups to better meet their characteristics. Meanwhile, in the variable-centered approach, it reduced the need for complex higher-order interactions between variables and resulted in concise simulations [16, 17]. In previous studies, LPA was used to analyze the potential characteristics of psychological resilience in emergency nurses, depressive symptoms in college students and their relationship with physical activity [14, 18]. The method has good applicability in psychological characterization studies. Motivation is similarly an important psychological trait variable and there is a lack of literature on the application of LPA to PrEP motivation in MSM population. Applying LPA allowed the identification of previously unobserved subgroups of population, leading to a better understanding of their hidden characteristics.

Therefore, based on data from a prospective cohort study in Western China, this study used the LPA model and aimed to investigate whether baseline PrEP motivation in the MSM population increased the likelihood of improvement in adherence and decreased the risk of decline in adherence, to further confirm the relationship between PrEP motivation and change in adherence, and to assess the predictive power of the adherence model.

Methods

Study design and participants

This study was a prospective cohort study conducted in Western China from November 2019 to June 2021. We recruited MSM who met the criteria in Chongqing, Sichuan, and Xinjiang in Western China with local NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations) and peer referrals. Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (Reference number: 2019001). Before participating in this research, the participants were fully informed about the purpose, significance, voluntary participation, and confidentiality of the research. Each participant signed an informed consent form. The main inclusion criteria included: (1) biological male (male at birth); (2) 18–65 years old; (3) had engaged in sex with male partners in the past 6 months; (4) HIV antigen antibody test negative; (5) willing to use medicine under guidance and follow up schedule; (6) signed informed consent.

Eligible study participants were enrolled in the PrEP cohort study. Participants took oral PrEP daily (Lamivudine and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets, 300 mg/tablet), and one tablet once a day. Follow-up visits and new drug dispensations were conducted every three months.

Measures

MSM who met the criteria were administered a basic demographic questionnaire that focuses on basic demographic characteristics, HIV-related characteristics, substance use characteristics, and the PrEP Motivation Scale.

The basic demographic characteristics included age, household registration location, ethnicity, education attainment, employment status, marital status, and monthly personal income.

There was a total of 11 variables for HIV-related characteristics of the MSM population. HIV knowledge score is measured by the HIV Knowledge Scale, which consists of 13 questions related to HIV, and a score of ≥ 11 indicates a high level of HIV knowledge [19]. Participants were asked, "Have you ever been tested and counseled for HIV before this visit?" Participants answered "yes" or "no" and their HIV testing and HIV counseling status were assessed. Participants measured their risk perception by using a score of 1 to 5 to assess their likelihood of HIV infection. 1 to 2 represented a low level of risk perception, 3 represented a moderate level, and 4 to 5 represented a high level. Previous literature mentioned that MSM may show different preferences and willingness to use PrEP and other biomedical prevention strategies based on the role of anal sex [20]. Our study included the variable "sexual role" to explore whether differences in sexual roles might lead to differences adherence to PrEP in MSM population. Sexual role was the way of performing sexual behavior with a male sexual partner, such as inserter (like "top") and receiver (like "bottom"). Participants were also asked about the number of male and female sexual partners in the last month; frequency of condom use; using condom throughout the sexual behavior; finding sexual partners though the Internet; and the history of sexually transmitted diseases (STD).

Characteristics of substance use mainly include alcohol use, recreational drug use, and engaging in commercial sex work. Substance use (alcohol use being the most common) was a common behavior among individuals taking PrEP and could influence medication adherence and engagement in HIV care and prevention [21]. Unhealthy alcohol use was a common and often unaddressed behavior associated with increased risk of acquisition and possibly decreased adherence to oral PrEP [22]. In our study, we included alcohol use because we believe that alcohol use may have an impact on PrEP adherence in MSM.

PrEP motivation

We used the PrEP Motivation Scale (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.713) to measure PrEP motivation among MSM population at baseline [23]. The scale divided PrEP motivation into personal motivation and social motivation, using 11 items to measure (Table 1). PrEP motivation scores were based on a five-point Likert scale ("1" for "not at all" and "5" for "always"), with total scores ranging from 11 to 55 on the scale. Higher PrEP motivation scores indicate stronger motivation for prevention [24, 25].

Table 1 The PrEP motivation scale

Adherence

At each follow-up visit, adherence was measured by self-reported. When asked, “In the last two weeks, have you had any missed doses? How many days did you miss?” the participants answered “yes” or “no” and the number of days missed (0–14 days). Adherence is equal to the proportion of days of medicine-taken. All answers were checked by the researchers. In case of illogical answers, quality control and corrections were made in the study site.

Follow-up visits were conducted every 3 months for a total of 4 visits, and we defined each follow-up visit as “Follow-up 1”, "Follow-up 2", "Follow-up 3", and "Follow-up 4". Change in short-term adherence refers to change in adherence from Follow-Up 1 to Follow-up 2 (improvement, decline, no change). Change in long-term adherence refers to change in adherence from Follow-Up 1 to Follow-up 4 (improvement, decline, no change). The schematic representation of long-term and short-term change in adherence is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The schematic representation of long-term and short-term change in adherence

Statistical analysis

Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) was used to group PrEP motivation into latent categories at baseline. The model fits were estimated by AIC (Akaike), BIC (Bayesian), aBIC (Sample-Size Adjusted BIC), Entropy, VLRT (Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test), and BLRT (Bootstrapped Likelihood Ratio Test). The smaller values of AIC, BIC, and aBIC, Entropy ≥ 0.80, and p-values < 0.05 for VLRT and BLRT indicate a good model fit. The optimal latent category classification scheme was selected to compare the variability of basic demographic characteristics, HIV-related characteristics, and substance use characteristics among different latent category groups.

The relationship between different levels of PrEP motivation and changes in short-term and long-term adherence in the MSM population was explored by multinomial logistic regression models, using change in adherence (improvement, decline, no change) as the dependent variables and no change in adherence as the reference. Variables with p ≤ 0.15 were first screened by univariate analysis and included in the regression model analysis, which was estimated using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

The predictive ability of the adherence model with the addition of PrEP motivation factor was assessed based on three indicators: AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), NRI (net reclassification index) and IDI (integrated discrimination improvement). The increase in AUC values, NRI > 0, IDI > 0, and p-values < 0.05 for all three indicators represent a positive enhancement of the predictive power of the model by the newly added variables. Since all independent variables had less than 10% missing values, missing values in the data were filled using the multiple fill method. The data analysis was done by Mplus software and SAS software.

Results

We recruited a total of 1325 MSM in Western China. 256 of them did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded, and a total of 1069 MSM were enrolled in the PrEP prospective cohort study. A total of 724 MSM were included in the model for the Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) because 345 MSM did not complete at least one follow-up visit and data on drug adherence were missing. The screening flow chart of the study participants is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The screening flow chart of the study participants. MSM: men who have sex with men; PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis

Then we explored the classification of latent categories from category 1 to category 5, respectively (Supplementary Table 1). According to the model fitting results, category 2 has the best model interpretability and the largest decrease in the values of indicators compared to others. Therefore, we selected the model with 2 latent categories (AIC = 25,812.95, BIC = 24,724.82, aBIC = 24,616.91, Entropy = 0.860, VLRT < 0.05, BLRT < 0.05).

218 (30.11%) MSM were assigned to latent category 1 with a mean and standard deviation of 35.43 ± 4.83 for PrEP motivation and a median and interquartile spacing of 36.00 (33.00–39.00). 506 (69.89%) MSM were assigned to latent category 2 with a mean and standard deviation of 43.66 ± 4.72 for PrEP motivation and a median and interquartile spacing of 44.00 (41.00–47.00). We defined latent category 1 as "low motivation group" and latent category 2 as "high motivation group". Comparison of the differences at baseline basic demographic characteristics, HIV-related characteristics, and substance use characteristics between the high and low motivation groups showed no statistical differences (Table 2).

Table 2 Differential comparison of several characteristics between the high motivation group and the low motivation group among MSM population

A percentage bar chart was used to describe the changes in short-term and long-term adherence (improvement, decline, no change, Fig. 3). Compared with the short-term phase, the proportion of the improvement in long-term adherence increased significantly, and the proportion of no change and decline in adherence decreased respectively (The results of the Chi-square test were shown in Supplementary Table 2). Multinomial logistic regression models were developed using changes in short-term and long-term adherence as dependent variables, respectively, and no change in adherence as reference. The process of screening variables for the multinomial logistic regression model was described in the Supplementary Table 3–6. According to the results of univariate analysis, the p-values of age and ethnicity were 0.096 and 0.062 for the subgroups with different long-term change in adherence, respectively. This suggested that older and Han Chinese MSM were more likely to have high adherence, so we adjusted for these in our final model. Based on the final model (Table 3), there was no significant effect of different levels of PrEP motivation on the change in short-term adherence, with p-values greater than 0.05. High levels of PrEP motivation contributed to the improvement in long-term adherence (OR = 3.028, 95%CI: 1.100–8.332, p = 0.031). However, high levels of PrEP motivation to reduce the risk of the decline in long-term adherence showed no significant effect (p > 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Percentage bar graphs of changes in short-term and long-term adherence

Table 3 Relationship between change in adherence (improvement, decline, no change) and PrEP motivation: a multinomial logistic regression model analysis

The conventional model refers to the model without PrEP motivation variable. In the short-term phase, the improvement and decline in adherence models showed no significant enhancement in predictive power compared to the model included PrEP motivation variable, with all p-values > 0.05. However, in the long-term phase, the predictive power of the improvement in adherence model increased significantly when PrEP motivation variable was added. AUC increased from 0.583 to 0.699, NRI = 0.665, IDI = 0.123, and all p-values < 0.05, which were statistically significant. There was no significant enhancement in predictive ability for the decline in adherence model in the long-term phase (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the predictive power of the improvement and decline in adherence models when PrEP motivation variable was added in the short-term and long-term phase

The results of the sensitivity analysis of other classification schemes can be found in the supplementary file (Supplementary Table 7–10). The scheme of 3C classification in LPA was selected for sensitivity analysis, and univariate and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed. The results of the sensitivity analysis also illustrated that the classification scheme of two potential categories of PrEP motivation was the most reasonable.

Discussion

Our findings showed that PrEP motivation was divided into two levels (high and low motivation groups) based on a PrEP prospective cohort study among MSM population in Western China, and provided evidence that high level of baseline PrEP motivation was significantly associated with the improvement in long-term adherence during follow-up.

Motivation is a key factor influencing behavior. A review published earlier showed that daily use of oral PrEP was effective, but the motivation to use drug and the perception of high risk was also of concern [26], which emphasized the importance of the motivation to take medicine. Understanding the motivation of MSM population to participate in HIV biomedical prevention strategy is also essential to increase their representativeness in studies that validate prevention strategies appropriate to their developmental characteristics and living environment [27]. PrEP can be boosted by the "motivation" of transgender and gender non-binary individuals to live an active and healthy life without fear of contracting HIV, according to a qualitative study in Southern California [28]. Four Multisite Prevention Trials, based on the their accumulated experience, also suggested fostering motivation can help support PrEP use [29]. These previous studies have highlighted the importance of motivation for PrEP, and our findings also further provided a more useful reference for PrEP motivation and adherence. According to our study, there is further evidence of the significant correlation between baseline PrEP motivation and improvement in long-term adherence among MSM population in Western China. In addition, our study also validated the predictive value of baseline PrEP motivation in terms of change in long-term adherence, improving the predictive power of adherence model.

Since motivation plays a critical role in PrEP adherence, appropriate interventions should be implemented for MSM with low levels of motivation who were screened at baseline. A brief motivational interview (MI) was found to be a feasible and acceptable method. The MI approach promoted motivation to take PrEP though a nonjudgmental discussion of the benefits and implications of taking PrEP and how this decision might align with individual’s goals. Previous research developed and evaluated a brief (15–25 min) motivational interviewing (MI)-based intervention to promote PrEP uptake. Its long-term goal was to develop a brief clinical intervention to promote acceptance of PrEP among high-risk MSM [30]. Furthermore, a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) also demonstrated preliminary effects of a brief behavioral motivational intervention in promoting the use of the drug among MSM who were behaviorally at risk for HIV infection [31]. Based on this, our findings were able to screen out the low-motivated MSM population and provide them with targeted motivational interventions, thereby increasing the efficiency of the interventions and promoting PrEP uptake in the high-risk population.

Prospective cohort studies of PrEP adherence would involve repeated measurements of adherence and adherence trajectories. For example, previous studies used the group-based trajectory model to construct the long-term adherence model [32], and growth mixture model (GMM) was utilized to identify individual subgroups with similar adherence trajectories [33]. However, our study used a different method than previous studies. For the longitudinal trajectory of adherence, we focused on the change in adherence and divided the changes into short-term and long-term phase to explore the impact of baseline PrEP motivation on change in adherence in the MSM population, which provides new ideas for more longitudinal analysis of adherence in the future. Notably, our results showed that PrEP motivation changed adherence in the long-term phase more significantly than in the short-term phase, suggesting that the effect of PrEP motivation on change in adherence became stronger with longer follow-up. And this is the previous longitudinal analysis of adherence could not conclude. In addition, according to our results, there were no statistically significant differences in several characteristics between high motivation group and low motivation group, suggesting that these variables did not affect the relationship between PrEP motivation and change in adherence. Moreover, PrEP motivation still had a significant impact on the change in adherence after adjusting other factors through univariate analysis. The predictive power of the long-term adherence model significantly increased when PrEP motivation variable was added. It suggests that baseline PrEP motivation can serve as a predictor of change in long-term adherence, which is very important for guiding and managing adherence. According to the PrEP Motivation Scale we use, to improve PrEP motivation in MSM population, we can consider two aspects. One the one hand, it is crucial from the perspective of the individual to improve self-efficacy in taking medicines and perceived HIV risk, as well as to comprehend the understanding of taking medicines in order to lessen worry about side effects. On the other hand, from a social perspective, we focus on the mental health of users and improve the relationship between medical professionals and patients in order to improve users' confidence in using medicines. Taken together, these findings from our study can provide additional favorable information for practice and research on the PrEP continuum of care.

We believe that there are several theories to support the effect of PrEP motivation on change in adherence: the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) Model [24], the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) [34], the Self-Determination Theory (SDT) [8] and Theory of Planned Behavior [35]. However, these theories are all related to motivation but posit slightly different and nuanced ways of understanding motivation and its impact on health behavior change. For example, SDT was typically used and thought of in terms of individual behavior change, often alongside motivational interviewing [36]. We believe that IMB can most accurately describe the theory of how motivation and PrEP adherence may operate in the MSM population. This model, first proposed by Fisher, is a theoretical model of healthy behavior. Information related to prevention, motivation related to prevention, and behavioral skills required for prevention were the important components of the model and were highly generalizable determinants of HIV prevention behavior [37, 38]. IMB model has been shown to be effective in enhancing HIV care, suggesting that motivation can increase the willingness of social workers to change clinical practice [39]. The IMB model also has been proven useful in promoting the willingness to use PrEP [40]. Previous study among Black MSM and transgender women in New York City found that motivational and behavioral skills screening can be used to identify where additional support is needed to improve PrEP adherence [41]. Based on the IMB model, the relationship between PrEP motivation and adherence behavior in MSM population in our study was explained, facilitating a better understanding of the relationship between motivation and behavior, and thus clarifying the direction of guidance, intervention, and management. In summary, the relevant theories on motivation and behavior not only provide a solid basis for our study, but also explain our findings well.

In our study we acknowledged that there were still some limitations. First, we excluded the MSM population that did not complete at least one adherence follow-up visit. The results of our analysis showed that the means and standard deviations of the PrEP motivation scores were 40.32 ± 5.95 and 41.19 ± 6.07 for the excluded and included groups, respectively; the median and interquartile range were 41.00 (36.00–45.00) and 42.00 (37.00–46.00), respectively. The difference in baseline PrEP motivation scores between the two groups was not significant, and we believe that it has a small potential impact on the results (Supplementary Table 11). Meanwhile, we are performing Latent profile analysis (LPA) based on the included data, which also avoids the effect of the excluded data on the classification of latent categories. Secondly, although the PrEP Motivation Scale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.713) has been validated in previous research [23], the scale is currently only used in the MSM population, and whether it is applicable to a broader population or includes additional motivational factors needs to be further explored in future research. In addition, for MSM with low levels of motivation, our study did not conduct a motivational interviewing-based intervention to explain the relationship between motivation and adherence behaviors more deeply. In future research and practice, motivational interviewing-based interventions should be included as a way to illustrate the effects of motivation on behavior. Lastly, adherence in this study was measured by self-reported, which may be overestimated due to recall bias and social desirability bias. Meanwhile, only employing 1 item to assess adherence was one of the limitations of our study. If conditions permit, we should also consider employing objective adherence measurements. However, previous studies have also pointed out that self-reported data may be reliable [42, 43].

Conclusion

In conclusion, our study suggests a positive association between high levels of baseline PrEP motivation and improvement in long-term adherence in the MSM population in Western China. Considering that PrEP efficacy is highly dependent on adherence and motivation is a modifiable subjective psychological characteristic, early monitoring, and intervention of PrEP motivation in MSM population may be important to improve adherence and enhance PrEP efficacy.

Availability of data and materials

For the privacy of MSM population, the dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Jun-Jie X, Chen Z, Qing-Hai H, Zhen-Xing C, Jing Z, Yong-Ze L, Lin L, Zhe W, Ji-Hua F, Xi C, et al. Recreational drug use and risks of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among Chinese men who have sex with men: Mediation through multiple sexual partnerships. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14(1):642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhao R, Fairley CK, Cook AR, Phanuphak N, He S, Tieosapjaroen W, Chow EPF, Phillips TR, Tan RKJ, Wei Y, et al. Optimising HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis and testing strategies in men who have sex with men in Australia, Thailand, and China: a modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(2):e243–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shufang S, Cui Y, Nickolas Z, Zhihua Z, Hongbo Z, Don O. PrEP willingness and adherence self-efficacy among men who have sex with men with recent condomless anal sex in urban China. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(11):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jun-Jie X, Wei-Ming T, Hua-Chun Z, Tanmay M, Qing-Hai H, Geng-Feng F, Zhe W, Lin L, Ming-Hua Z, Xi C, et al. High HIV incidence epidemic among men who have sex with men in china: results from a multi-site cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2016;5(1):82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ching S, Wong L, Said M, Lim S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Educ Prev. 2020;32(5):416–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robert G, Javier L, Peter A, Vanessa M, Albert L, Lorena V, Pedro G, Martín C, Vicente GCJ, E RCM, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(27):2587–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Molina J, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, Tremblay C, Le Gall J, Cua E, Pasquet A, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryan R, Deci E. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25(1):54–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Christopher F, Jennifer K, Janis F, Lina H, Debra K, Beth S. The blood donor identity survey: a multidimensional measure of blood donor motivations. Transfusion. 2014;54(8):2098–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoang NL, Thi NHL, Xuan TB, Mattias L. C RLE, Anna T, Susanne S: A qualitative assessment in acceptability and barriers to use pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men: implications for service delivery in Vietnam. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21(1):472–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marie B, Alain M, Vincent T, Cyril P, Gérard B, Jacques R, Agnès OE. Pre-exposure prophylaxis makes it possible to better live one’s sexuality and guide men who have sex with men towards a responsible approach to their health: a phenomenological qualitative study about primary motivations for PrEP. AIDS Res Ther. 2021;18(1):2–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Héctor M-M, Beatriz A-L, Julián T-I, Pilar C-P, Bolivar Rocha MC, Ximena G-O, Martínez-Cajas JL, Jose-Ramon B. Scales to assess knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy for HIV PrEP in Colombian MSM: PrEP-COL study. AIDS Res Treatment. 2021;2021:4789971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhixin Z, Yongxia M, Xiaoxuan W, Hu J, Wenna W, Beilei L, Zhenxiang Z. Meaning in life among nursing students: a latent profile analysis. BMC Nurs. 2023;22(1):264–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li L, Wang P, Zhao Q, Liu Z, Li S, Wang X. Latent profile analysis of depressive symptoms in college students and its relationship with physical activity. J Affect Disord. 2024;351:364–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Linghui K, Huijun Z. Latent profile analysis of depression in non-hospitalized elderly patients with hypertension and its influencing factors. J Affect Disord. 2023;341:67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhuo L, Jennifer L, Tianlu S, Qamara R, Cheng JT, Benson AJ. Power motives, personality correlates, and leadership outcomes: a person-centered approach. J Pers. 2023:1–18.

  17. Stephanie L, Xianming T, Bethany B. Latent class analysis with distal outcomes: a flexible model-based approach. Struct Equ Modeling. 2013;20(1):1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Z, Guo N, Chen T, Liao L, Hu S, Wang L. A latent profile analysis of resilience and the associations with flourishing in emergency nurses exposed to workplace violence in China. Nurs Health Sci. 2024;26(1):e13085–e13085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin B, Liu J, Ma Y, Zhong X. Factors influencing HIV testing and counselling services among men who have sex with men in Western China: a cross-sectional study based on Andersen's Behavioral Model. Environ Health Prev Med. 2022;27:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. William G, John S, Rhodes H, Noah K, Jace M, Park SH, Mgbako O, Duncan DT. Are anal sex roles associated with preferences for pre-exposure prophylaxis administration modalities among men who have sex with men? Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(7):2123–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Onyema O, Marshall BDL, Tiberio P, Adedotun O, Barakat L, Montgomery M, Almonte A, Tyler W, Williams EC, Edelman EJ, et al. Prevalence and correlates of unhealthy alcohol and drug use among men who have sex with men prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in real-world clinical settings. AIDS Behav. 2019;23(1):190–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strong SH, Oldfield BJ, van den Berg JJ, Cole CA, Biegacki E, Ogbuagu O, Virata M, Chan PA, Edelman EJ. Perspectives on unhealthy alcohol use among men who have sex with men prescribed HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: A qualitative study. Prev Med Rep. 2024;37:102553-.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Qu D, Zhong X, Xiao G, Dai J, Liang H, Huang A. Adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis among men who have sex with men: A prospective cohort study. Int J Infect Dis. 2018;75:52–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher J, Fisher W. Changing AIDS-risk behavior. Psychol Bull. 1992;111(3):455–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher J, Fisher W, Bryan A, Misovich S. Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. Health Psychol. 2002;21(2):177–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gengiah T, Moosa A, Naidoo A, Mansoor L. Adherence challenges with drugs for pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV infection. Int J Clin Pharm. 2014;36(1):70–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Celia F, Adam F, Leah IP, Kathryn M, Brian M. "Free testing and PrEP without outing myself to parents:" Motivation to participate in oral and injectable PrEP clinical trials among adolescent men who have sex with men. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Watson CW-M, Pasipanodya E, Savin MJ, Ellorin EE, Corado KC, Flynn RP, Opalo C, Lampley E, Henry BL, Blumenthal J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to PrEP initiation and adherence among transgender and gender non-binary individuals in Southern California. AIDS Educ Prev. 2020;32(6):472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rivet AK, Mansoor LE, Corneli A, Torjesen K, van der Straten A. Adherence support approaches in biomedical HIV prevention trials: experiences, insights and future directions from four multisite prevention trials. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(6):2143–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moitra E, van den Berg JJ, Sowemimo-Coker G, Chau S, Nunn A, Chan PA. Open pilot trial of a brief motivational interviewing-based HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis intervention for men who have sex with men: preliminary effects, and evidence of feasibility and acceptability. AIDS Care. 2020;32(3):406–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chan PA, Nunn A, Van den Berg J, Cormier K, Genoviva S, Sowemimo-Coker G, Napoleon SC, Arnold T, Moitra E. A randomized trial of a brief behavioral intervention for PrEP uptake among men who have sex with men at increased risk for HIV infection. J Acquired Immune Def Syndr. 2021;87(3):937–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fengyi J, Janaki A, Rebecca G, Stefanie V, Christine S, Iryna Z, Jo H, Karen P, Barbara Y, Erin O, et al. Adherence to daily HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis in a large-scale implementation study in New South Wales, Australia. AIDS. 2021;35(12):1987–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pasipanodya EC, Jain S, Sun X, Blumenthal J, Ellorin E, Corado K, Dube MP, Daar ES, Morris SR, Moore DJ. Trajectories and predictors of longitudinal preexposure prophylaxis adherence among men who have sex with men. J Infect Dis. 2018;218(10):1551–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Arista L, Suman JS, Arup C, Madhumita D, Abhijit D. Role of threat and coping appraisal in protection motivation for adoption of preventive behavior during COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Public Health. 2021;9:678566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. M’Sallem W. Role of motivation in the return of blood donors: mediating roles of the socio-cognitive variables of the theory of planned behavior. Int Rev Publ Nonprofit Market. 2021;19:153–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. William M, Stephen R. Meeting in the middle: motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9(1):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fisher F. Williams, Malloy: Empirical tests of an information-motivation-behavioral skills model of AIDS-preventive behavior with gay men and heterosexual university students. Health psychology. 1994;13(3):238–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fisher W, Kohut T, Fisher J. AIDS exceptionalism: on the social psychology of HIV prevention research. Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2009;3(1):45–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dusty H, Veronica P, Karen M. IMB model in practice: social workers' intentions to change their practice following HIV mental health training. Soc Work Health Care. 2013;52(5):483–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shrestha R, Altice FL, Huedo-Medina TB, Karki P, Copenhaver M. Willingness to use Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): An empirical test of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model among high-risk drug users in treatment. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(5):1299–308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Knox J, Kutner BA, Shiau S, Winterhalter FS, Wu Y, Hirsch Moverman Y, El Sadr W, Colson PW, Franks J. Assessing the information-motivation-behavioral skills model to predict pre-exposure prophylaxis adherence among black men who have sex with men and transgender women in a community setting in New York City. AIDS Behav. 2022;26(7):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Eric S, Margaret R, Heino M-B, Alice S-M. Test-retest reliability of self-reported sexual behavior, sexual orientation, and psychosexual milestones among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(2):225–34.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Luana M, Thiago T, Luri L, Ronaldo M, Luz PM, Brenda H, Kallas EG, Valdez MJ, Liu AY, Anderson PL, et al. Performance of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis indirect adherence measures among men who have sex with men and transgender women: Results from the PrEP Brasil Study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0221281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly grateful to the participants who took the time to complete our study. We also extend our gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their feedback and helpful comments on this article. Additionally, artificial intelligence was not used at any stage in writing this article.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of Joint United Nations Pro-gramme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Project for Infectious Diseases of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2018ZX10721102-005), the Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (No. 22SKGH071), the Intelligent Medicine Young Talents Key Research Project of Chongqing Medical University (No. ZHYXQNRC202203), and the Philosophy and Social Sciences Project of Chongqing Medical University (No. ZSK0302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiaoni Zhong was responsible of the conception and design of the study. Bing Lin, Jiaxiu Liu, Haiying Pan, Wei He, and Hong Zhang were in charge of the analysis and interpretation and the data collection process. All authors were involved in the drafting of the manuscript and critically reviewed it for important intellectual content. All authors gave their approval on the final version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoni Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University (Reference number: 2019001). Before participating in this research, the participants were fully informed about the purpose, significance, voluntary participation, and confidentiality of the research. Each participant signed an informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, B., Liu, J., Pan, H. et al. Longitudinal relationship between pre-exposure prophylaxis motivation and change in adherence among men who have sex with men in Western China. BMC Public Health 24, 1271 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18729-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18729-x

Keywords