Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evaluating knowledge, attitude, and physical activity levels related to cardiovascular disease in Egyptian adults with and without cardiovascular disease: a community-based cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 1107 (2024) Cite this article

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 02 May 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a significant health challenge in Egypt, yet there exists limited understanding regarding the knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity levels associated with CVD. These factors play a pivotal role in developing effective prevention and management strategies. Hence, this cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate Egyptian adults’ knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity (KAP) levels.

Methods

Data were collected using a previously validated questionnaire encompassing demographic characteristics, CVD knowledge (including risk factors and symptoms), attitudes toward CVD, and self-reported physical activity levels. The survey was distributed among social media channels, and trained researchers administered the questionnaire via face-to-face interviews with adult patients with and without CVD admitted to Cairo University Hospital clinics.

Results

The study involved 591 participants, of whom 21.7% had CVD. Overall, participants exhibited poor knowledge regarding CVD, with a mean score of 21 ± 7 out of 40, equivalent to 52.5%. Attitudes toward CVD were moderate, with a mean score of 66.38 ± 8.7 out of 85, approximately 78%. Physical activity levels per week were also moderate, averaging 1188 MET-min with a range of 1121–18,761. Subgroup analysis revealed that individuals with CVD had lower average knowledge, attitude, and physical activity levels than those without CVD. Working in the healthcare field was a predictor of higher knowledge score (standard error (SE) 5.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.61 to 7.17, P < 0.001), while those with CVD and smokers were predictors of lower attitude score (SE -4.08, 95% CI -6.43 to -1.73, P < 0.001) and (SE -2.54, 95% CI -4.69 to -0.40, P = 0.02), respectively.

Conclusion

The study findings highlight a significant disparity in knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity levels related to CVD in Egypt. Targeted interventions aimed at improving awareness, fostering positive attitudes, and promoting physical activity among individuals at risk for CVD are crucial for effective prevention and management.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major source of morbidity and mortality around the world [1]. It includes coronary artery disease, stroke, and heart failure, all of which can have severe consequences for individuals, families, and healthcare systems [2]. According to estimates, 17.9 million deaths worldwide in 2016 were attributed to CVDs, or 31% of all deaths. The World Health Organization states that heart attacks and strokes account for 85% of these deaths. More than 75% of deaths from CVDs occur in low- and middle-income nations [3, 4].

Several individual and socio-environmental factors may be contributing to the rising CVD epidemic: a sedentary lifestyle, high cholesterol, diabetes, obesity, smoking, high-fat diets, and excessive alcohol use are among the modifiable risk factors for CVD [5, 6]. According to the Global Burdens of Disease Report, high blood pressure and smoking were found to be the leading global risk factors for early death and disability across all age groups [1, 7]. As a result, the morbidity and mortality of the disease can be avoided by creating more targeted population-based prevention programs. Since it has been shown that awareness of CVD and its risk factors is a precondition for changing people’s health behaviors and lifestyles, having a solid understanding of these factors can help people reduce their risk. Furthermore, knowing the warning signals of a heart attack or stroke might help patients arrive at the hospital early and have better results [8, 9].

Numerous global studies demonstrate the low level of population-level knowledge, attitude, and physical activity (KAP) on CVDs and emphasize the significance of increasing the KAP level to lessen the burden of CVDs [10,11,12]. Studies on Egyptians’ awareness of heart disease and its modifiable risk factors are scarce. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity related to cardiovascular disease among Egyptian adults, both with and without cardiovascular disease. By conducting a community-based cross-sectional study, we seek to understand the prevalence and patterns of these factors in the general population. The findings of this study could provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals and policymakers in developing targeted interventions and strategies to promote cardiovascular health in Egypt.

Methods

Ethical considerations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Research Committee of Cairo University, Egypt (012/004122). Informed consent was obtained from all participants before their inclusion in the study, ensuring confidentiality and privacy of their information.

Study design and eligibility criteria

We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study adhering to the STROBE guidelines [13] from September 11 to October 16, 2023. The inclusion criteria included adults who could understand Arabic residents of Egypt. Participants were with and without CVD (hence after, referred to as CVD and non-CVD for simplicity) and had to be ≥ 18 years old. The exclusion criteria that the inclusion criteria cannot meet are those with a physical disability. The exclusion criteria included all residents under 18 years old and those who refused to participate in the study or were uncollaborative during the interview.

Sample size determination

The total sample size required for this study was calculated based on sample size calculation methods for a single proportion using an online sample size calculator (Open Epi) [14]. Assuming a CVD prevalence of 36% [15], a minimum sample size of 120 participants was required to detect a similar proportion rate with 95% confidence intervals and 5% precision. This sample size was determined to adequately capture the variability within each group and ensure statistical significance in the study outcomes. Moreover, the design effect accounted for the stratified sampling methodology employed, which enhanced the representativeness and generalizability of the findings across different demographic segments.

Data collection

Two main strategies were employed to collect data for this study. First, we developed an online link to a web-based questionnaire using “Google Forms.” A Plain Language Information Statement (PLIS) and Consent Form were provided on the initial screen. The PLIS included information about local country-specific investigators who facilitated responses to relevant questions during data collection. After providing consent and meeting age and other inclusion criteria, participants could proceed to subsequent pages to answer the questionnaire.

The second approach involved direct interviews with individuals from clinics associated with Cairo University Hospital. Ethical approval was obtained, allowing for seamless collaboration and efficient data collection. In both strategies, participant selection was entirely random, ensuring the inclusion of diverse perspectives from both patient groups. This approach enhances the overall robustness and reliability of the study findings. Notably, this approach was also used in previous studies [12, 16].

The questionnaire

The validated survey instrument initially originated from a previous study conducted in Lebanon by Machaalani et al. [12] and was adapted to suit the Egyptian population for this research endeavor. Rigorous review processes were undertaken to ensure the validity and reliability of the KAP scores. Furthermore, meticulous attention was given to defining all variables within the questionnaire, including CVD-related physical activity, smoking status, social status, and obesity, thereby facilitating precise data collection and interpretation. Physical activity levels were calculated based on responses provided in the IPAQ Sect. [17], allowing for stratification and analysis of participants’ activity levels.

The questionnaire was divided into the following sections:

  1. i.

    Sociodemographic and other patient-related characteristics: 11 questions assessing the patient’s sex, age, marital status, occupation, educational level, social and economic status, working in the healthcare field, suffering from cardiovascular diseases (diagnosed by a specialist), smoking status, Medical history of chronic disease and Source of information.

  2. ii.

    CVD knowledge: 40 questions assessing patients’ knowledge of CVD and its consequences, symptoms of coronary heart disease (CHD), CVD risk factors, CVD risk levels (desirable values of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), fasting glycemia, normal blood pressure (BP) ranges, and normal BMI).

  3. iii.

    CVD Attitude: 17 questions covered regular lipid profile, glycemia, and blood pressure measurements; diet plan; salt intake; treatment adherence; maintenance of normal body weight; and exercise. After that, that was reviewed by two experts in the CVD field with experience of > 10 years. The survey on CVD-related attitudes assessed participants’ perspectives through 17 items, each rated on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

  4. iv.

    CVD Physical Activity: these seven questions include walking, sitting, and intense and mild physical activity during the last three months. It inquires explicitly about the frequency and length of walking, the amount of time spent sitting during the workday, and the frequency and duration of both strenuous and moderate physical activities. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form) IPAQ is a validated instrument designed primarily for population surveillance of adults. It has been developed and tested for use in adults (age range of 15–69 years) [17].

Regarding the scoring, the knowledge and attitude sections were scored so that every correct answer was granted 1 point and each wrong answer a 0. A 5-point Likert scale was adopted in which ‘strongly disagree’ was given 1 point and ‘strongly agree’ was given 5 points for all items. The overall KAP score was calculated from the sum of the points granted, where the cut-off value was the median for each section based on previously reported KAP investigations [18, 19].

Statistical analysis

The Collected data were analyzed using RStudio software. The cumulative replies to each question were reported along with their respective percentages. Data were represented as frequencies and proportions for the nominal variables. Normally distributed continuous variables were reported as mean (± SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) for not normally distributed data. Scores of KAP were computed. Items included for the knowledge score were 40, 17 for the attitude score, and 7 for the physical activity score. The tests used were the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, which were tests with ANOVA. In addition, the correlation between the three ABK scores was tested using the Pearson or Spearman correlation test. A multivariate analysis was conducted to test factors affecting each of the three scores in the population, and its results were reported as standard error (SE) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). The significance level was set at 5%.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 591 participants were included in this study. Of them, 21.7% had a CVD. A statistically significant higher percentage of males was found in the CVD group (76.6%) compared to the non-CVD group (44.9%)(P < 0.001). Age significantly differed between the two groups (P < 0.001), with the CVD group having a higher median age (25 years, range 19–72) compared to the non-CVD group (22 years, range 16–65). Age categories also exhibited a significant difference (p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of young individuals (< 45 years) in the non-CVD group (97.2%) compared to the CVD group (78.9%). In terms of marital status, a total of 59.7% of the participants reported being single. A higher percentage of the CVD group reported being married compared to the non-CVD group (88.3% vs. 25.3%, respectively) (P < 0.001).

The total prevalence of current smokers was 14.7%. The CVD group (36.7%) showed a significantly higher proportion of current smokers compared to non-CVD (8.6%) (P < 0.001). Occupation, educational level, social and economic status, and healthcare field employment were all significantly associated with CVD with a P-value < 0.001. A higher percentage of CVD patients reported being employed (82.8%), having a university educational level (81.3%), lower social and economic status (87.5%), and not working in the healthcare field (96.9%). Several medical history variables showed a significantly higher prevalence of these conditions among individuals with CVD compared to non-CVD individuals, including diabetes mellitus (32.8% vs. 2.4%), hypertension (60.9% vs. 5.2%), high cholesterol (22.7% vs. 4.1%), previous surgeries (22.7% vs. 14.5%), lung disease (16.4% vs. 3.5%), liver disease (9.4% vs. 0.9%), and renal disease (7% vs. 1.5%).

In this section, sources of information about cardiovascular diseases, attending medical conferences, healthcare worker status, and specialized health journals were significantly associated with CVD status with a P-value < 0.001, with a lower proportion of CVD patients reporting these sources of information. Other demographic details are in Table 1.

Table 1 Bivariate analysis of the included respondents’ demographics and other features (CVD patients vs. non-CVD participants; N = 591)
Full size table

CVD-related KAP

The findings indicated that the overall CVD knowledge among all participants was poor grade, with a mean score of 21 ± 7 out of 40, equivalent to 52.5%. Participants demonstrated a moderate attitude concerning CVD, scoring a mean of 66.38 ± 8.7 out of 85, approximately 78%. Physical activity per week was also moderate according to IPAQ criteria [17], with a median of 1188 MET-min with a range of [0-19278]. When we examined each subgroup separately, we found that the average knowledge score related to CVD in CVD patients was lower compared to non-CVD responders. Specifically, it was 20 ± 6.9 out of 40 (representing a poor level), whereas non-CVD responders scored 21.37 ± 7 out of 40 (indicating a poor level as well), with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.007). Likewise, the mean attitude score regarding CVD in CVD patients was significantly lower than in non-CVD responders. CVD patients scored an average of 62.8 ± 7.4 out of 85 (indicating a moderate level), while non-CVD responders scored 67.35 ± 8.7 out of 85 (also indicating a moderate level), with the difference being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Additionally, the average MET-min per week in CVD patients was significantly lower compared to non-CVD responders, standing at 1557 ± 2401 (indicating a moderate level) versus 2789 ± 3302 (also indicating a moderate level) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). For more details, refer to Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2 Bivariate analysis of participants’ distribution (N) (CVD vs. Non-CVD) based on subcategories (Poor, Moderate, Good) and KAP scores regarding CVD
Full size table
Table 3 The mean range of the assessment scores
Full size table

CVD-related knowledge

Among the population, 88.5% correctly acknowledged the relationship between CVD and the heart, while 84.4% understood that hypertension is a CVD risk factor. However, 57.7% believe that most cancer is not a CVD risk factor, and 69.4% incorrectly think that CVD is not the primary cause of death in diabetic patients. For detailed results, please refer to Table S1.

CVD-related attitude

A significant proportion of participants expressed a strong willingness to exercise (4.3 ± 1.0) and change eating habits easily (3.9 ± 1.0). The majority agreed that maintaining an average weight (2.7 ± 1.36), not smoking or being exposed to passive smoke (4.5 ± 1.1), and taking treatment as recommended by a doctor (4.3 ± 1.0) were essential for cardiovascular health. Participants showed hesitation in taking Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) (2.6 ± 1.5) and expressing resistance to traditional medicine preferences (3.2 ± 1.4). For more details, please refer to Table S2.

CVD-related physical activity

A larger number of the CVD group exhibited moderate physical activity in specific categories, including those who were either young (< 45 years) or older (> 65 years), single, had no formal education, were post-graduates, and had a moderate socioeconomic status. Conversely, non-CVD participants showed more individuals with low physical activity levels in all remaining categories.

Correlation among KAP score parameters

Among CVD patients, there were positive but nonsignificant correlations between Attitude and Knowledge (r = 0.104, P = 0.242), Attitude and Physical Activity (r = 0.08, p = 0.387), and Knowledge and Physical Activity (r = 0.101, P = 0.275). Non-CVD patients showed a significant positive correlation between Attitude and Knowledge (r = 0.12, P = 0.01), but the correlations between Attitude and Physical Activity and Knowledge and Physical Activity were not significant. These findings highlight distinct patterns of association between KAP parameters in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease Table 4.

Table 4 Correlation among KAP score parameters
Full size table

Sociodemographic characteristics of CVD patients and non-CVD participants with poor knowledge, poor attitude, and low physical activity score

CVD individuals had a higher occurrence of poor CVD knowledge scores compared to non-CVD patients across various sociodemographic characteristics. However, there are some exceptions to this trend: participants aged over 65 (50% vs. 100%), divorced participants (0% vs. 66.7%), those with a secondary educational level (50% vs. 62.5%), and individuals with high socioeconomic status (0% vs. 29.2%). Among the characteristics examined, a greater number of CVD participants displayed poor attitudes towards CVD in the following groups: females, adults aged 45–65, those who were single or married, individuals with no formal education or post-graduate qualifications, employed individuals, those with a moderate socioeconomic status, and non-smokers. In contrast, non-CVD participants exhibited a higher number of individuals with poor attitudes towards CVD in all other categories. Table 5 represents the CVD and non-CVD patients with poor knowledge scores, poor attitudes, and low physical activity categorized by their sociodemographic characteristics.

Table 5 According to sociodemographic status, the percentage (%) of Egyptian CVD patients and non-CVD subjects (Control) with poor knowledge, poor attitudes, and low physical activity about CVD
Full size table

Factors affecting knowledge and attitude scores of the enrolled CVD patients and non-CVD participants

We used the bivariate analysis to identify the factors influencing CVD and non-CVD participants’ knowledge and attitude scores. The knowledge score showed no significant association with any factors examined in the CVD or non-CVD groups Table S3. In non-CVD participants, the attitude score exhibited a significant association with smoking status (P-value = 0.031). No other characteristics were associated with the attitude score in the non-CVD or CVD groups Tables S3 and S4.

Predictors of KAP among enrolled populations

Multiple linear regression was applied to identify predictors of knowledge score, which was significantly (p < 0.05) and positively associated with working in the health care field but negatively associated with sex, marital status, occupation, educational level, socioeconomic status, suffering from CVD and smoking (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Multiple linear regression of knowledge score

Full size image

Attitude towards CVD was positively associated with suffering from CVD but negatively associated with working in the health care field, sex, marital status, occupation, educational level, socioeconomic status, and smoking (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Multiple linear regression of attitude score

Full size image

Discussion

A total of 591 participants were included in the study. Our results showed that males, older age, marriage, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol participants were significantly associated with CVD. Overall knowledge about CVD was poor, with a mean score of 52.5%. Attitudes toward CVD were moderate, with a mean score of 78%. Physical activity levels were also moderate on average. CVD patients had significantly lower knowledge, attitude, and physical activity scores than those without CVD. CVD patients were more likely to have poor knowledge across various demographics. Non-CVD participants had poorer attitudes in most categories except females, middle-aged, married, less educated, employed, moderate socioeconomic status, and non-smokers. Smoking was the only factor significantly associated with attitudes in non-CVD participants.

According to historical perspectives on CVD risk indicators, most risk factors were determined to be more prevalent in CVD patients than in non-CVD responders [20, 21]. Biological risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and obesity have been consistently identified as significantly more prevalent among individuals with CVD compared to those without the disease. Elevated blood pressure, abnormal lipid profiles, impaired glucose metabolism, and increased body mass index are established markers contributing to CVD’s pathogenesis and progression [22, 23]. Our findings indicated that the overall CVD knowledge among all participants was poor. In terms of attitudes, participants demonstrated a moderate level of attitude concerning CVD. Regarding physical activity per week, it was also at a moderate level. When we examined each subgroup separately, we found that the average knowledge score related to CVD in CVD patients was lower than non-CVD responders, unlike the Machaalani et al. study in which CVD patients showed more knowledge about CVD than non-CVD responders [12]. However, as was also noticed in other studies, the degree of knowledge in both sub-populations remained low. For instance, Wang et al. discovered that before obtaining health education and rehabilitation education, the knowledge levels of both the CVD and non-CVD groups were lower in the Chinese populations, and this is in line with the prevalence of CVD in China, which accounted for 46.74 of all deaths [24, 25]. According to Rosediani et al. Only a tiny percentage of women in Northeast Coast Malaysia were aware of unusual CVD symptoms such as nausea, jaw discomfort, and left shoulder pain [23]. Another study from Malaysia supports the premise of potentially lower CVD risk awareness. Ang et al. found that the incidence of sudden cardiac death was lower in East Malaysia compared to Western nations despite similar CVD prevalence. They attributed this to under-reporting and decreased healthcare accessibility in rural areas of East Malaysia [26]. In contrast, Nursyafiza et al. and Koohi et al., carried out in Kuantan and Tehran, respectively, revealed that participants had enough awareness of CVDs and their risk factors, which is questionable as the CVD-related death in Tehran is still relatively high according to the latest evidence [10, 11, 27]. Among the whole population in our study, 88.5% correctly acknowledged the relationship between CVD and the heart, while 84.4% understood that hypertension is a CVD risk factor. Likewise, other studies demonstrated that patients were mostly aware of smoking, diabetes, and hypertension as risk factors for CVD [10, 12]. However, in our study, 57.7% believe that most cancer is not a CVD risk factor, and 69.4% incorrectly think that cardiovascular disease is not the primary cause of death in diabetic patients. Doctors usually tend to concentrate on screening for menopausal disorders and reproductive malignancies, based on the assumption that women are less likely than males to get CVD [28]. This makes it more difficult for them to identify risk factors, create initiation therapy, diagnose heart problems like myocardial infarction, consult specialists, and give emergency care [29]. According to the Framingham Study, silent myocardial infarction accounts for a higher proportion of unexpected deaths in women who have never experienced a heart attack [30, 31]. Likewise, the mean attitude score regarding CVD in CVD patients was significantly lower than in non-CVD responders. However, attitudes in both groups stayed within the moderate level. Unlike our study, Wang et al. found that the CVD group had a significantly higher positive attitude than the non-CVD individuals [32]. Regarding physical activity, a larger number of the CVD group exhibited low physical activity in specific categories, including those who were either young (< 45 years) or older (> 65 years), single, had no formal education, post-graduates, and had a moderate socioeconomic status. Conversely, non-CVD participants showed more individuals with low physical activity levels in all remaining categories. According to numerous epidemiological research, higher levels of physical exercise are associated with a lower risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Frequent engagement in aerobic exercise, such as running, cycling, swimming, or fast walking, has been demonstrated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related illnesses, including stroke. Improvements in blood pressure, lipid profiles, insulin sensitivity, vascular function, and general cardiovascular fitness are among the factors underpinning this protective impact [33,34,35,36,37].

Strength and limitations

Both individuals with and without CVD were included in this study, allowing for comparisons between the groups. We used a validated questionnaire to comprehensively assess CVD-related knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity. Additionally, the questionnaire was administered through face-to-face interviews conducted by trained researchers with CVD patients. However, there are some limitations: the cross-sectional design prevents the inference of causality in relationships between variables; self-reported data on physical activity and medical history may be affected by recall or reporting biases; the study was conducted at a single center in one region of Egypt, which limits generalizability to other populations; the extensive number of questions in the survey may have burdened participants, potentially affecting the quality of responses due to fatigue or time constraints. Therefore, only 3% of the responses were collected online. The data collection strategy was extended to include on-site face-to-face interviews to address this. However, the availability of places for face-to-face interviews was mainly limited to the clinics of Cairo University Hospital, where ethical approval was obtained. This posed challenges for the research team in accessing different healthcare facilities. Researchers and policymakers should consider these limitations when interpreting the results and designing future studies.

Research recommendation

Based on the study’s findings, several research recommendations can be made. Firstly, there is a need for targeted interventions to improve knowledge about CVD among both CVD patients and the general population. Additionally, efforts should be made to address misconceptions, such as the incorrect belief that cancer is not a CVD risk factor. Secondly, interventions should aim to improve attitudes towards CVD, particularly among CVD patients. Future research endeavors could expand the study’s geographical coverage to include multiple regions across Egypt, further enhancing the findings’ generalizability to the broader Egyptian population. Lastly, strategies to promote physical activity should be implemented, targeting populations with low physical activity levels, such as young and older individuals, those with lower education levels, and those with moderate socioeconomic status.

Conclusion

All participants’ overall knowledge about CVD was poor, with an average score of 52.5%. Attitudes toward CVD were moderate, with a mean score of 78%. Physical activity levels were also moderate on average. CVD patients had lower knowledge, attitude, and physical activity scores than those without CVD. Risk factors like hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and obesity were more prevalent in CVD patients. The study highlighted the need for improved knowledge, attitudes, and physical activity levels to prevent and manage CVD.

Data availability

The data and materials used in this cross-sectional study are available upon request For the data contact the first author: dr. Alaa Ramadan Email: Alaaramadan251@gmail.com.

Change history

References

  1. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular diseases and Risk factors, 1990–2019. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hajar R. Framingham contribution to cardiovascular disease. Heart Views. 2016;17:78. https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-705X.185130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Accessed: December 19. 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).

  4. Deek H, Newton P, Inglis S, Kabbani S, Noureddine S, Macdonald PS, Davidson PM. Heart health in Lebanon and considerations for addressing the burden of cardiovascular disease. Collegian. 2015;22:333–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2014.04.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarrafzadegan N, Mohammmadifard N. Cardiovascular Disease in Iran in the last 40 years: Prevalence, Mortality, Morbidity, challenges and Strategies for Cardiovascular Prevention. Arch Iran Med. 2019;22:204–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearson TA, Palaniappan LP, Artinian NT, et al. American Heart Association Guide for Improving Cardiovascular Health at the Community Level, 2013 Update: A Scientific Statement for Public Health Practitioners, Healthcare Providers, and Health Policy makers. Circulation. 2013;127:1730–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828f8a94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mezhal F, Oulhaj A, Abdulle A, et al. High prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors amongst young adults in the United Arab Emirates: the UAE Healthy Future Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023;23:137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-023-03165-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaidya A, Aryal UR, Krettek A. Cardiovascular health knowledge, attitude and practice/behaviour in an urbanising community of Nepal: a population-based cross-sectional study from Jhaukhel-Duwakot Health Demographic Surveillance Site. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002976. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Muntner P, Woodward M, Mann DM, et al. Comparison of the Framingham Heart Study Hypertension Model with blood pressure alone in the prediction of risk of hypertension: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Hypertension. 2010;55:1339–45. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.149609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Koohi F, Khalili D. Knowledge, attitude, and Practice Regarding Cardiovascular Diseases in Adults Attending Health Care Centers in Tehran, Iran. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2020;18. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijem.101612.

  11. Mohammad N, Rahman NA, Haque M. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the risk of cardiovascular diseases in patients attending outpatient clinic in Kuantan, Malaysia. J Pharm Bioall Sci. 2018;10:7. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_227_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Machaalani M, Fakhry B, Zwaihed M, Mendelek K, Mahmoud N, Hammoud T, Chahine MN. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward Cardiovascular diseases in the Lebanese Population. Global Heart. 2022;17:47. https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Elm EV, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335:806–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. OpenEpi Menu. Accessed: December 19. 2023. https://www.openepi.com/Menu/OE_Menu.htm.

  15. An overview of cardiovascular disease and research| RAND. Accessed: December 19. 2023. https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WR467.html.

  16. Sayed IE, Abdelmonem S. A cross-sectional study to assess evidence-based Medicine teaching method: online or face-to-face? BMJ evidence-based medicine. 2019, 24:59–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111117.

  17. IPAQ - Score, Accessed. December 20, 2023. https://sites.google.com/view/ipaq/score.

  18. Vogt D, Schaeffer D, Messer M, Berens E-M, Hurrelmann K. Health literacy in old age: results of a German cross-sectional study. Health Promot Int. 2018;33:739–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dax012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gautam V, Rustagi SD. Health literacy, preventive COVID 19 behaviour and adherence to chronic disease treatment during lockdown among patients registered at primary health facility in urban Jodhpur. Rajasthan Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome: Clin Res Reviews. 2021;15:205–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.12.023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hajar R. Risk factors for coronary artery disease: historical perspectives. Heart Views. 2017;18:109. https://doi.org/10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_106_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore FE. Epidemiological approaches to Heart Disease: the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1951;41:279–86. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.41.3.279.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu S, Bao M-Y, Miao S-M, et al. Prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, and their additive effects on myocardial infarction and stroke: a cross-sectional study in Nanjing, China. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:436–436. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.09.04.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Martín-Timón I. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: have all risk factors the same strength? WJD. 2014;5:444. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v5.i4.444.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z-W. Status of cardiovascular disease in China. J Geriatric Cardiol. 2023;20:397–8. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2023.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu S-S. Report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2021: an updated summary. J Geriatric Cardiol. 2023;20:399–430. https://doi.org/10.26599/1671-5411.2023.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ang CW, Ismail R, Kassim Z, Mohd Ghazali AN, Reidpath D, Su TT. Frequent eating out and 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: evidence from a Community Observatory in Malaysia. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2748382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Toreyhi H, Asgari S, Khalili D, Pishgahi M, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Sudden cardiac death among Iranian population: a two decades follow-up of Tehran lipid and glucose study. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95210-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2010;18:598–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-010-0841-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Donnell S, Condell S, Begley C, Fitzgerald T. Prehospital care pathway delays: gender and myocardial infarction. J Adv Nurs. 2006;53:268–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03722.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Beiser A, Levy D. Lifetime risk of developing coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1999;353:89–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10279-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kannel WB. Silent myocardial ischemia and infarction: insights from the Framingham Study. Cardiol Clin. 1986;4:583–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8651(18)30577-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang J, Chen L, Yu M, He J. Impact of knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP)-based rehabilitation education on the KAP of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. Ann Palliat Med. 2020;9:388–93. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2020.03.01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nystoriak MA, Bhatnagar A. Cardiovascular effects and benefits of Exercise. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:135. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Tian D, Meng J. Exercise for Prevention and Relief of Cardiovascular Disease: Prognoses, mechanisms, and approaches. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2019, 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3756750.

  35. Carnethon MR. Physical activity and Cardiovascular Disease: how much is Enough? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2009;3:S44–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827609332737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kubota Y, Evenson KR, Maclehose RF, Roetker NS, Joshu CE, Folsom AR. Physical activity and lifetime risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:1599–605. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001274.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nagata JM, Vittinghoff E, Gabriel KP, et al. Physical activity from young adulthood to middle age and premature cardiovascular disease events: a 30-year population-based cohort study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01357-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to express our heartfelt gratitude to our esteemed data collaborators for their invaluable contributions in ensuring the accessibility of our study to diverse populations. Their unwavering efforts have played a pivotal role in making our research available to a wide range of individuals.

Omar Elsayed Mohamed

Faculty of Medicine, Misr University of Sciences and Technology

3maralsayed2001@gmail.com

Abdelrahman Ahmed Anter

Faculty of Medicine, Misr University of Sciences and Technology

Bedoahmed1999@gmail.com

Mohamed Fouad Abdrabo

Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt

mohamedfouadabdrabo@gmail.com

Abdelnasser Mahmoud Elbeshbeshy

Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

naser.ma7m0ud484@gmail.com

Sarah Ahmed Mostafa

Faculty of Medicine, Helwan University

sarahelghondakli@yahoo.com

Toka Mohamed MagdAldin

Faculty of Medicine, Misr University of Sciences and Technology

toqa.magd@gmail.com

Amr Shehab

Faculty of Medicine, Misr University of Sciences and Technology

amr.hazem.shehab@gmail.com

Funding

No funds were received.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

    Alaa Ramadan

  2. Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    Heba Aboeldahab

  3. Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

    Mohamed Nabih Bashir & Mohamed Mohamed Belal

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt

    Ahmed Wageeh

  5. Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Ahmed Atia & Doha Omar Kamel Omar

  6. Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK

    Doha Omar Kamel Omar

  7. School of Allied Health Professions, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK

    Hady Atef

  8. Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Hady Atef

  9. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

    Mohamed Elbanna

  10. Faculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syrian Arab Republic

    Tala Jouma Alhejazi

  11. Faculty of Medicine, Misr University of Sciences and Technology, Cairo, Egypt

    Esraa Khalid & Osama Ahmed Abd Elaziz

  12. Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

    Mariam Ibrahim Eldeeb

  13. Department of Physical Pharmacy and Pharmacokinetics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

    Mohamed Abouzid

  14. Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

    Mohamed Abouzid

  15. Department of Women’s Health, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

    Neveen Refaey

  16. Cardiovascular Medicine, Minia University, Minya, Egypt

    Amr Setouhi

  17. Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Qena University Hospital, Qena, Egypt

    Mohammed AK

Authors
  1. Alaa Ramadan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heba Aboeldahab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohamed Nabih Bashir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohamed Mohamed Belal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed Wageeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ahmed Atia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mohamed Elbanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tala Jouma Alhejazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mohamed Abouzid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hady Atef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Esraa Khalid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Osama Ahmed Abd Elaziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mariam Ibrahim Eldeeb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Doha Omar Kamel Omar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Neveen Refaey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Amr Setouhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Mohammed AK
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AR: study design. AR,HA, AW, ME, AA, TJA, EK, OAAE, MIE, DOKO, NR managed data collection. AR, HA, MNB, and MMB managed data analysis, and manuscript drafting. MA, HA, AS, and MAK collaborated on manuscript revisions. All authors contributed to writing, reviewing and approving the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Nabih Bashir.

Ethics declarations

Human ethics and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Research Committee of Cairo University, Egypt (012/004122) and all methods were carried out according to relevant guidelines and regulations or the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before their inclusion in the study, ensuring confidentiality and privacy of their information. Participation was completely voluntary, and the participants could choose to quit at any time for any reason while answering the questionnaire.

Conflict of interest

No conflict to declare.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from this study’s participants, their parents, and legally authorized representatives.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article has been updated to correct an author name.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramadan, A., Aboeldahab, H., Bashir, M.N. et al. Evaluating knowledge, attitude, and physical activity levels related to cardiovascular disease in Egyptian adults with and without cardiovascular disease: a community-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 24, 1107 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18553-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18553-3

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us