Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality assessment of quantitative studies

From: Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Africa: a systematic review

Article

Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers (Kmet et al., 2004)

Question or objectives clearly described

Study design evident and appropriate

Method of subject selection described and appropriate

Subject characteristics sufficiently described

Sample size appropriate

Analytic methods described, justified and appropriate

Results described in sufficient detail

Conclusions supported by results

Total Score

Nwankwo et al. (2011) [28]

2

2

1

2

0

1

2

2

12 Medium

Compaore et al. (2016) [29]

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

14 High

Tarwireyi (2005) [30]

2

2

2

2

0

1

2

2

13 High

Kress et al. (2015) [31]

2

1

2

2

1

2

2

2

14 High

Abiodun et al. (2013) [32]

2

2

2

0

2

1

1

2

12 Medium

Okunowo et al. (2018) [33]

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

16 High

Perng et al. (2013) [34]

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

10 Medium

Ebu et al. (2015) [35]

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

16 High

Rosser et al. (2015) [36]

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

15 High

Chigbu et al. (2011) [37]

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

15 High

Titiloye et al. (2017) [38]

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

16 High

Ibekwe et al. (2011) [39]

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

16 High

Abiodun et al. (2013) [40]

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

15 High

Getachew et al. (2019) [41]

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

16 High

Back to article page

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us