Skip to main content
Download PDF

Myths and common misbeliefs about cervical cancer causation among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 189 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer (CC) myths and beliefs can negatively impact women's preventive behaviors, including vaccination against human papillomavirus and having regular screening tests. This study aimed to examine awareness of Palestinian women about myths related to CC causation and investigated factors associated with good awareness.

Methods

A national cross-sectional study was conducted to recruit adult Palestinian women from hospitals, primary healthcare facilities, and public areas in 11 Palestinian governorates. A translated-into-Arabic version of the Cancer Awareness Measure-Mythical Causes Scale was used to collect data. Awareness level was determined based on the number of CC myths around CC causation recognized to be incorrect: poor (0–4), fair (5–9), and good (10–13).

Results

A total of 7058 questionnaires were included. Myths unrelated to food were more commonly recognized as incorrect compared to those related to food. The most recognized food-unrelated myth was ‘having a physical trauma’ (n = 3714, 52.6%), whereas the least recognized was ‘using mobile phones’ (n = 2238, 31.7%). The most recognized food-related myth was ‘drinking from plastic bottles’ (n = 2708, 38.4%), whereas the least recognized was ‘eating food containing additives’ (n = 1118, 15.8%).

Only 575 participants (8.1%) displayed good awareness and promptly recognized at least 10 out of 13 myths around CC causation as incorrect. Factors associated with lower likelihood of displaying good awareness of myths around CC causation included living in the West Bank and Jerusalem, being married, widowed or divorced, knowing someone with cancer, and visiting hospitals or primary healthcare centers.

Conclusions

A very small proportion of Palestinian women recognized 10 or more myths around CC causes as incorrect. Initiatives addressing CC myths are needed in the Palestinian community.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) is a significant cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide [1, 2]. A total of 604,000 women were diagnosed with CC in 2020, making it the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer among females globally [2]. Approximately 85% of CC-related deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries, where the disease burden is noticeably higher in terms of incidence, death, and disability adjusted life years [3, 4]. In Palestine, CC is the third most common gynecological cancer with an age-standardized incidence rate of 2.5 per 100,000 females in 2018 [5]. Reports from Globocan 2020 indicate that the 5-year prevalence of CC is 6.05 per 100,000 female population. In addition, there were 64 Palestinian women diagnosed with CC in 2020, of whom 44 (68.8%) died from their disease [6].

Given the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations, CC is considered a preventable cancer and is highly treatable if detected early by screening programs [7, 8]. While having access to efficient screening and medical care facilities is crucial to preventing and detecting CC, shared myths and sociocultural misconceptions about the disease may impact women's preventive behaviors. A previous study from the United Kingdom concluded that CC mythical causes could include eating food containing additives, using microwave ovens, having a physical trauma, feeling stressed, living near power lines and exposure to electromagnetic frequencies [9]. The way by which women perceive CC risk factors may play a role in prompt risk reduction behaviors [10]. However, behavior modification for true CC risk factors may be less likely to occur if behavioral changes are dominated by myths around CC causes [10, 11].

In Palestine, both HPV vaccination and CC screening program are not part of the national health policy [12]. Previous studies assessing the awareness level of CC risk factors, warning signs, and HPV vaccines demonstrated a lack of knowledge among Palestinian women [13,14,15]. Women's CC-related risk perceptions and attitudes may contribute to their adoption of healthy behaviors. Such healthy preventive behaviors of CC include vaccination against HPV, getting screened regularly, stopping smoking, and practicing safe sexual contact [16]. Therefore, a thorough understanding of how mythical causes of CC are perceived by Palestinian women is needed as a crucial step in launching educational interventions and promoting CC preventive practices. As a result, this study aimed to (1) examine the recognition of myths around CC causes to be incorrect among Palestinian women (2) make comparisons between women living in the two main areas of Palestine: West Bank and Jerusalem (WBJ) and the Gaza Strip, and (3) examine the factors associated with a better ability to recognize such myths as incorrect.

Materials and Methods

Study design and population

A cross-sectional, descriptive design was used in this study. Data were collected from Palestine's main two regions, the Gaza Strip and the WBJ, between the 1st of July 2019 and 31st of March 2020. About 50% of Palestinian women are in their childbearing age [17]. Therefore, adult women (aged over 18 years) were recruited from 11 governorates, out of 16 Palestinian governorates, with four governorates in the Gaza Strip (North of Gaza, Gaza, Middle Zone, and Khanyounis) and seven governorates in the WBJ (Hebron, Nablus, Ramallah, Tulkarm, Bethlehem, Jenin, and Jerusalem). Those governorates were chosen as they covered the majority of the Palestinian Population.

Sample size calculation

In 2019, the female population aging 15 years or older was 1,534,371 in Palestine [18]. With a type I error rate of 5.0%, a confidence level of 95.0%, and an absolute error of 1.0%, the minimum sample size required to detect a 10% good overall awareness of CC causation myths was 900 participants.

Sampling methods

Convenience sampling was utilized to recruit eligible women from hospitals, primary healthcare facilities, and public spaces. The public spaces included shopping centers, markets, parks, restaurants, mosques, churches, and transport networks. The data collection sites were distributed across various locations in Palestine to maximize the representativeness of the study cohort for the Palestinian community [13,14,15, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Adult Palestinian women who were visiting one of the data collection sites were eligible. Women having nationalities other than Palestinian, those who were working or pursuing education in a health-related field, those who were attending oncology departments at the time of data collection, and those who were unable to complete the questionnaire were all excluded from the study.

Measurement tool and data collection

A modified version of the Cancer Awareness Measure-Mythical Causes Scale (CAM-MYCS) was used to collect data [9]. The CAM-MYCS was translated from English to Arabic by two bilingual healthcare professionals, and then back-translated from Arabic to English by two other bilingual healthcare professionals. All these healthcare professionals had relevant expertise in gynecologic oncology, public health, and survey design. Five independent healthcare professionals and researchers evaluated the questionnaire's content validity. Then, a pilot study (n = 130) was carried out in order to evaluate the clarity of the Arabic questionnaire. The final analysis did not include the questionnaires of the pilot study. The questionnaire had an acceptable internal consistency with Cronbach's Alpha of 0.79.

The study questionnaire is provided in supplementary file 1. The questionnaire comprised two sections. The first section described sociodemographic data including age, highest level of education, employment status, monthly income, marital status, knowing someone with cancer, place of residence, having a chronic illness, and site of data collection. The second section assessed the ability of participants to recognize 13 myths around CC causation as being incorrect. All but one of the examined myths were adopted from the original CAM-MYCS [9]. The item ‘eating burnt food’ was deemed important to be added [28].

The Arabic questionnaire was modified for the purposes of this study. The original questions of the CAM-MYCS with correct/incorrect/unsure responses were modified into 5-point Likert scale questions (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = not sure, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree) to minimize the possibility of participants answering questions at random. Meanwhile, the participants’ responses were then converted to correct/incorrect responses, where responses with ‘strongly disagree’ or ‘disagree’ were considered correct and all other responses were considered incorrect.

Eligible participants were invited to a face-to-face interview to complete the questionnaire with the presence of a data collector. Data were collected using Kobo Toolbox, a reliable and user-friendly application that can be utilized on smartphones [29].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe participant characteristics. Categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages, whereas continuous variables, which were non-normally distributed, were described using the median and interquartile range (IQR). The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare baseline characteristics of participants recruited from the Gaza Strip and those recruited from the WBJ if the characteristic was continuous, while Pearson's Chi-square test was used if the characteristic was categorical.

Age was categorized into three groups to reflect the age-associated risk of CC: 18–20 years, 21–40 years (at-risk group), and ≥ 41 years [30]. Since the minimum wage in Palestine is 1450 NIS (about $450) [31], the monthly income was also categorized into two categories: < 1450 NIS and ≥ 1450 NIS.

The examined myths around causes of CC were classified into food-related and food-unrelated causes. Frequencies and percentages were used to describe the recognition of each myth and Pearson's Chi-Square test was used for comparisons between participants from the Gaza Strip versus those from the WBJ.

Multivariable logistic regression analyses were utilized to examine the association between participant characteristics and recognizing each myth around CC causation as being incorrect. The multivariable analyses adjusted for age-group, educational level, employment status, monthly income, marital status, place of residency, having a chronic disease, knowing someone with cancer, and site of data collection. This model was determined a priori based on previous studies [9, 10, 13,14,15, 32, 33].

Awareness of the investigated myths about causes of CC was assessed utilizing a scoring system, which had also been used in previous studies [13,14,15, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, 34]. The participant received one point for each correctly recognized myth. The total score (ranging from 0 to 13) was calculated and categorized into three categories based on the number of myths recognized as being incorrect: poor (0 to 4), fair (5 to 9), and good awareness (10 to 13). The ability to recognize myths around CC causation to be incorrect was compared between participants from the Gaza Strip and those from the WBJ using Pearson's Chi-Square test. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to examine the association between participant characteristics and displaying good awareness. The same aforementioned multivariable model was used.

Missing data were hypothesized to be missed completely at random and thus, complete case analysis was utilized to handle them. Data were analyzed using Stata software version 17.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, United States).

Results

Participant characteristics

Out of 8086 approached, a total of 7223 participants agreed and completed the questionnaire (response rate = 89.3%). A total of 7058 questionnaires were included in the final analysis (30 did not meet inclusion criteria and 135 had missing values); 2655 were from the Gaza Strip and 4403 from the WBJ. Participants recruited from the Gaza Strip were younger, earned lower monthly income, and had fewer chronic diseases than those recruited from the WBJ (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants
Full size table

Recognition of myths around CC causation to be incorrect

In general, the myths around CC causation unrelated to food were more commonly recognized to be incorrect by participants than those related to food. The food-unrelated myth around CC causation that was most commonly recognized was ‘having a physical trauma’ (n = 3714, 52.6%), whereas the one least commonly recognized was ‘using mobile phones’ (n = 2238, 31.7%) (Table 2). The food-related myth around CC causation that was most commonly recognized was ‘drinking from plastic bottles’ (n = 2708, 38.4%), whereas the least recognized was ‘eating food containing additives’ (n = 1118, 15.8%).

Table 2 Summary of the assessment of public beliefs in mythical causes of cervical cancer
Full size table

The ability to recognize myths around CC causation and its associated factors

Only 575 participants (8.1%) displayed good awareness and were able to recognize 10 or more myths around CC causes to be incorrect (Table 3). Participants from the Gaza Strip were more likely than participants from the WBJ to display good awareness of the examined myths to be incorrect (10.3% vs. 6.8%). Besides living in the WBJ, being married, widowed or divorced, knowing someone with cancer, and visiting hospitals or primary healthcare centers were all associated with lower likelihood to display good awareness and recognize myths around CC causation to be incorrect (Table 4).

Table 3 Recognition of mythical causes of cervical cancer among study participants
Full size table
Table 4 Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with having good recognition of the mythical causes of cervical cancer
Full size table

Association between recognizing CC food-related mythical causes and participant characteristics

Participants recruited from hospitals or primary healthcare centers were less likely than participants recruited from public spaces to recognize all CC food-related myths (Table 5). In addition, participants ≥ 20 years were less likely than younger participants to recognize all examined food-related myths around CC causation to be incorrect, except ‘using microwave ovens’, where no associated difference was found. Similarly, married participants were less likely than single participants to recognize all examined food-related myths around CC causes to be incorrect, except ‘eating food containing artificial sweeteners, where no associated difference was observed. Moreover, participants who knew someone with cancer were less likely than participants who did not to recognize all CC food-related myths except for ‘eating burnt food’, where no associated difference was found. Finally, participants from the WBJ were less likely than participants from the Gaza Strip to recognize all CC food-related myths to be incorrect, except ‘eating burnt food’ and ‘eating food containing additives’, where no associated differences were found. There was no association between education level and recognizing all CC food-related myths except ‘eating genetically modified food’, which participants with higher education were less likely to recognize it to be incorrect.

Table 5 Multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with the recognition of each mythical food-related cause of cervical cancer
Full size table

Association between recognition of food-unrelated myths around CC causation and participant characteristics

Participants from the WBJ were less likely than participants from the Gaza Strip to recognize all examined myths around CC causes, unrelated to food, to be incorrect (Table 6). In addition, participants ≥ 40 years were less likely than younger participants to recognize all examined food-unrelated myths around CC causes, except ‘having a physical trauma’, where no associated difference was found. Participants recruited from hospitals or primary healthcare centers were less likely than participants recruited from public spaces to recognize five out of the seven food-unrelated myths.

Table 6 Multivariable logistic regression analyzing factors associated with the recognition of each other mythical cause of cervical cancer
Full size table

Participants who knew someone with cancer were less likely than participants who did not to recognize four out of the seven food-unrelated myths around CC causation to be incorrect. In contrast, participants with higher monthly income were more likely to recognize the four most frequently reported food un-related myths around CC causes, namely ‘having a physical trauma’, ‘using aerosol containers’, ‘using cleaning products’, and ‘feeling stressed’. There was no association between education level and recognition of five out of the seven food-related myths of CC causes.

Discussion

Dispelling myths related to CC causation in Palestine holds paramount importance in promoting informed health practices and preventive measures. This study investigated the ability of Palestinian women to recognize myths around CC causes to be incorrect and explore the factors associated with good recognition. The study findings indicated that only 575 participants (8.1%) showed a good ability to recognize the examined myths, defined as being able to identify more than nine out of 13 myths around CC causation to be incorrect. Compared to WBJ participants, women from the Gaza Strip were more likely to recognize the myths to be incorrect (10.3% vs. 6.8%). Aside from living in the WBJ, being married, widowed, or divorced, knowing someone with cancer, and visiting hospitals or primary healthcare centers were all associated with lesser abilities to recognize myths around CC causes to be incorrect.

This study showed low awareness and highlighted misconceptions of CC mythical causes, in concordance with previous studies conducted in the United Kingdom and China [10, 35]. Women frequently linked certain environmental and lifestyle factors—which have no significant impact on the development of the disease —with higher risks to develop CC. These misconceptions may mislead women and impact their health beliefs, by distracting focus on such fictitious risk factors, instead of making healthy lifestyle adjustments that could lower their risk of developing cancer [36, 37]. Lifestyle changes alone could prevent between one-third to one-half of cancer cases [37, 38]. Better understanding of the environmental and lifestyle variables that increase risks of developing cancer may encourage behaviours to reduce such risks [37, 38]. It is essential to effectively raise public awareness of myths around CC causes, which may impact their attitudes and behaviours and target effective lifestyle changes by reducing distractions [9, 10]. Particularly in low- and middle-income settings, like Palestine, which lacks HPV vaccination and CC screening programs, such awareness is important [13,14,15].

The most important risk factor for CC is infection with high-grade HPV subtypes [39, 40]. In Palestine, HPV infection has been identified in 89% of CC specimens, 68% of pregnant women, and 25% of non-pregnant women [41]. Awareness of women regarding the association between HPV infection and CC is pivotal for encouraging participation in CC screening programs and fostering acceptance of vaccination. This significance is particularly highlighted by the success of HPV immunization programs in diminishing the morbidity and mortality rates linked with CC [42].

Preventing CC among Palestinian women necessitates a nuanced approach that considers the cultural, social, and religious aspects shaping their healthcare practices. Preventive practices, such as regular screenings through Pap smears and HPV vaccinations, have been shown to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with CC [42,43,44]. However, in addition to the lack of CC screening programs and HPV vaccination as part of the national health policy, numerous barriers may exist and be intertwined with cultural norms and religious beliefs. Women may be discouraged from obtaining preventative care because of cultural taboos around talking about reproductive health especially if they were unmarried. Moreover, important information concerning CC and potential preventive strategies can be hindered by social factors, such as low awareness and educational opportunities. Religious considerations, particularly modesty concerns, may also influence women's hesitancy to undergo screening if it becomes available. Collaborative efforts are required to bridge these gaps, involving community leaders, healthcare providers, and educational institutions. Culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate health campaigns can dispel misconceptions, emphasizing the importance of preventive practices while respecting the unique cultural and religious contexts of Palestinian women.

Similar to this study, Sherman and colleagues reported a significant belief in the mythical causes of CC, such as stress (14%), living near power lines (7%), pollution (5%), and food additives (5%) [45]. Another study conducted in Iran found that some women thought that stress might contribute to CC. As a result, women used various techniques to combat their stress, such as relaxing, listening to music, and exercising [46]. The propagation of such misconceptions might be a consequence of social media use. Social media has accelerated the spread of myths and misinformation, which may have negatively impacted women's trust in health information and may have made it more challenging for women to distinguish the actual causes of cancer from the myths that are presented incorrectly as causes for cancer [47,48,49,50]. Consequently, this might cause women to disregard evidence-based public health measures [51]. An important part of the role of healthcare providers is to guide women towards reliable sources of health information and, thus, increase their health literacy. This is especially important given that participants visiting healthcare facilities were less likely to recognize myths of CC causes to be incorrect.

A study conducted in six public schools in Kenya found that schools and mass media were the primary sources of information about CC [52]. School curricula should encourage young women to seek health information from evidence-based sources, and to nurture awareness of possible misinformation on the internet and social media. This study showed no difference between participants with higher education and those with lower educational achievements in terms of recognizing most examined myths to be incorrect. This highlights the need for inclusion of CC mythical causes in the school curricula as well as interventions to increase health literacy in primary healthcare centers to target a broad section of the population. An intervention of anti-CC teaching targeting high school students in Nigeria was effective for increasing awareness related to myths and appeared to be sustained if engagement action was maintained over time [53]. It is possible for newly acquired knowledge or attitudes to decline over time as a result of ongoing external stimuli or beliefs [54]. Ifediora and colleagues considered CC myths could be hard to tackle, unless the real reasons for these myths can be unraveled [53]. Therefore, policymakers should ensure extra efforts to maintain targeting myths during health campaigns [53].

Future directions

This study highlighted some myths and misconceptions about CC causation among Palestinian women. These misconceptions might be corrected using educational interventions targeting the public through mass media, social media and school curricula. Furthermore, healthcare institutions should play a role in increasing the public awareness since a high percentage of the population living in Palestine may have no access to online sources [55] and participants attending these institutions seem to have lower awareness. By addressing and correcting these myths, healthcare initiatives can promote public understanding of the actual risk factors associated with CC like HPV infection. This, in turn, may enhance timely engagement in CC screening programs and may facilitate acceptance of preventive measures like HPV vaccinations when they become available. Additionally, dispelling myths contributes to reducing the stigma surrounding CC, fostering an environment that encourages open discussions about reproductive health and empowers women to make informed decisions about their well-being.

Limitations

The use of a convenience sample may impact the generalizability of the results, but this may have been mitigated by the large sample size, data collection from various geographic locations, and high response rate. A further limitation could be the exclusion of participants with medical backgrounds who presumably have good awareness levels of CC mythical causes. Nonetheless, their exclusion was intended to increase the relevance of the study as a measure of the public awareness. Finally, there could exist some other myths related to HPV vaccination and CC screening that might be interesting to assess their prevalence in the Palestinian community. However, the focus of this study was to examine CC causation myths that were included in the validated CAM-MYCS [9].

Conclusions

Only 8.1% of the study participants could identify 10 or more out of the 13 examined myths around CC causes to be incorrect. Factors associated with lower likelihood to recognize myths around CC causation to be incorrect included living in the WBJ, being married, widowed or divorced, knowing someone with cancer, and visiting hospitals or primary healthcare centers. CC mythical causes unrelated to food were recognized more frequently than those related to food. Overall, this study demonstrates a necessity for a national strategy to generate a better understanding of CC causes and dispel the widely held misconceptions. Integrating social media platforms and school-based health education could be an effective strategy to promote community knowledge, health literacy and support health promotion initiatives.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analyzed during the current study will be available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CC:

Cervical cancer

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

WBJ:

West Bank and Jerusalem

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. World Health Organization. Improving data for decision-making: a toolkit for cervical cancer prevention and control programmes. https://bit.ly/2RhPwAr. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Atun R, Jaffray DA, Barton MB, Bray F, Baumann M, Vikram B, Hanna TP, Knaul FM, Lievens Y, Lui TY, et al. Expanding global access to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(10):1153–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang X, Zeng Q, Cai W, Ruan W. Trends of cervical cancer at global, regional, and national level: data from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjose S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. International Agency for Research on Cancer. GLOBOCAN 2020: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the Gaza Strip and West Bank in 2020. https://bit.ly/2QUyO9Y. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  7. Couture MC, Nguyen CT, Alvarado BE, Velasquez LD, Zunzunegui MV. Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women. Prev Med. 2008;47(5):471–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. World Heatlh Organization. WHO director-general calls for all countries to take action to help end the suffering caused by cervical cancer. https://bit.ly/2L9tBsm2019. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  9. Smith SG, Beard E, McGowan JA, Fox E, Cook C, Pal R, Waller J, Shahab L. Development of a tool to assess beliefs about mythical causes of cancer: the Cancer Awareness Measure Mythical Causes Scale. BMJ Open. 2018;8(12): e022825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahab L, McGowan JA, Waller J, Smith SG. Prevalence of beliefs about actual and mythical causes of cancer and their association with socio-demographic and health-related characteristics: Findings from a cross-sectional survey in England. Eur J Cancer. 2018;103:308–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cameron LD, Leventhal H. The self-regulation of health and illness behavior. London: Routledge; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Halahleh K, Gale RP. Cancer care in the Palestinian territories. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):e359–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elshami M, Al-Slaibi I, Abukmail H, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Thalji M, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Knowledge of Palestinian women about cervical cancer warning signs: a national cross- sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Elshami M, Thalji M, Abukmail H, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Elshami M, Abukmail H, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Radaydeh A, Alfuqaha A, Thalji M, Khader S, Khatib L, Fannoun N, et al. Awareness of human papillomavirus and acceptability of the vaccine among women in Palestine: is it time for policy adjustment? BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.What Can I Do to Reduce My Risk of Cervical Cancer?. https://bitly.ws/35eve. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  17. Palestinian Ministry of Health. Annual Report for Ministry of Health in Palestine 2019. https://bit.ly/39FtEFR. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  18. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). The Palestinians at the end of the year 2019. https://bit.ly/2WBXVBO. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  19. Elshami M, Mansour A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Abukmail H, Shurrab H, Qassem S, Usrof FD, Alruzayqat M, Aqel W, et al. Current situation and future directions of lung cancer risk factor awareness in Palestine: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2023;13(1): e061110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Elshami M, Abukmail H, Aqel W, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Shurrab H, Qassem S, Usrof FD, Alruzayqat M, Nairoukh R, et al. Awareness of Palestinians about lung cancer symptoms: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Elshami M, Dwikat MF, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Mohamad BM, Isleem WS, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, Qabaja YA, Naji SA, et al. Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Risk Factors in Palestine: Where Do We Stand? JCO Glob Oncol. 2022;8: e2200070.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Elshami M, Tuffaha A, Yaseen A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Jabr H, Ubaiat S, Khader S, Khraishi R, Jaber I, et al. Awareness of ovarian cancer risk and protective factors: A national cross-sectional study from Palestine. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(3): e0265452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Elshami M, Yaseen A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Jabr H, Ubaiat S, Tuffaha A, Khader S, Khraishi R, Jaber I, et al. Knowledge of ovarian cancer symptoms among women in Palestine: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1992.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Elshami M, Ayyad MM, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Ahmed Naji S, Mohamad BM, Sudki Isleem W, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, Qabaja YA, et al. Awareness of colorectal cancer signs and symptoms: a national cross-sectional study from Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):866.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Elshami M, Ismail IO, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Ghithan RJ, Usrof FD, Qawasmi MAM, Okshiya HM, Shurrab NRS, Mahfouz II, et al. Common myths and misconceptions about breast cancer causation among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Elshami M, Mansour A, Alser M, Al-Slaibi I, Abukmail H, Shurrab H, Qassem S, Usrof FD, Alruzayqat M, Aqel W, et al. Myths and Misconceptions Around Lung Cancer Causation in Palestine: Is It Time to Intervene? JCO Glob Oncol. 2023;9: e2300184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Elshami M, Naji SA, Dwikat MF, Al-Slaibi I, Alser M, Ayyad M, Mohamad BM, Isleem WS, Shurrab A, Yaghi B, et al. Myths and Common Misbeliefs About Colorectal Cancer Causation in Palestine: A National Cross-Sectional Study. JCO Glob Oncol. 2024;10: e2300295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Research Cancer UK. Can eating burnt foods cause cancer? https://www.shorturl.at/coO39. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  29. Harvard Humanitarian Initiative. KoBoToolbox. https://www.kobotoolbox.org. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  30. Simon AE, Wardle J, Grimmett C, Power E, Corker E, Menon U, et al. Ovarian and cervical cancer awareness: development of two validated measurement tools. J Family Plan Reprod Health Care. 2012;38(3):167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Awad O. The labor reality in Palestine for 2019 on the occasion of International Workers' Day. https://bit.ly/3n84Uw6. Accessed January 7, 2024.

  32. Paytubi S, Benavente Y, Montoliu A, Binefa G, Brotons M, Ibáñez R, Ochoa C, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Serrano B, Travier N, et al. Everything causes cancer? Beliefs and attitudes towards cancer prevention among anti-vaxxers, flat earthers, and reptilian conspiracists: online cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2022;379: e072561.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cunningham SA, Yu R, Shih T, Giordano S, McNeill LH, Rechis R, Peterson SK, Cinciripini P, Foxhall L, Hawk E, et al. Cancer-Related Risk Perceptions and Beliefs in Texas: Findings from a 2018 Population-Level Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019;28(3):486–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Elshami M, Al-Slaibi I, Ghithan RJ, Alser M, Shurrab NR, Ismail IO, Mahfouz II, Fannon AA, Qawasmi MA, Hawa MR, et al. Women’s awareness of breast cancer symptoms: a national cross-sectional study from Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):801.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang LD, Lam WW, Wu J, Fielding R. Hong Kong Chinese women’s lay beliefs about cervical cancer causation and prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(18):7679–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Daher M. Cultural beliefs and values in cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 3):66–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Munir R, Noureen N, Bashir M, Shoaib N, Ashraf A, Lisec J, Zaidi N. Cancer Awareness Measure (CAM) and Cancer Awareness Measure MYthical Causes Scale (CAM-MY) scores in Pakistani population. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8887.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Redeker C, Wardle J, Wilder D, Hiom S, Miles A. The launch of Cancer Research UK’s “Reduce the Risk” campaign: baseline measurements of public awareness of cancer risk factors in 2004. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):827–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(4):664–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wardak S. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer. Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 2016;68(1):73–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lubbad AM, Al-Hindi AI. Bacterial, viral and fungal genital tract infections in Palestinian pregnant women in Gaza. Palestine West Afr J Med. 2007;26(2):138–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Falcaro M, Castanon A, Ndlela B, Checchi M, Soldan K, Lopez-Bernal J, Elliss-Brookes L, Sasieni P. The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence: a register-based observational study. Lancet. 2021;398(10316):2084–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Arbyn M, Bryant A, Beutels P, Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Van Hoof E, Steben M, Qiao Y, Zhao FH, Schneider A et al: Prophylactic vaccination against human papillomaviruses to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2011(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009069.

  44. Schiller JT, Castellsague X, Garland SM. A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5 (0 5)):F123-138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sherman SM, Lane EL. Awareness of Risk Factors for Breast, Lung and Cervical Cancer in a UK Student Population. J Cancer Educ. 2015;30(4):660–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Khazaee-Pool M, Yargholi F, Jafari F, Ponnet K. Exploring Iranian women’s perceptions and experiences regarding cervical cancer-preventive behaviors. BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Golbeck J. Social media and shared realityOff the Edge: Flat Earthers, Conspiracy Culture, and Why People Will Believe Anything Kelly Weill Algonquin Books, 2022. 256 pp. Science. 2022;375(6581):624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Swire-Thompson B, Lazer D. Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:433–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359(6380):1146–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Teplinsky E, Ponce SB, Drake EK, Garcia AM, Loeb S, van Londen GJ, Teoh D, Thompson M, Schapira L. Online Medical Misinformation in Cancer: Distinguishing Fact From Fiction. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18(8):584–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Househ M, Borycki E, Kushniruk A. Empowering patients through social media: The benefits and challenges. Health Informatics J. 2014;20(1):50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mburu A, Itsura P, Mabeya H, Kaaria A, Brown DR. Knowledge of Cervical Cancer and Acceptability of Prevention Strategies Among Human Papillomavirus-Vaccinated and Human Papillomavirus-Unvaccinated Adolescent Women in Eldoret. Kenya Biores Open Access. 2019;8(1):139–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ifediora C, Veerman L, Azuike E, Ekwochi U, Obiozor W. Outcomes from integrating anti-cervical cancer teachings into the curriculum of high schools in a South-Eastern Nigerian State. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1914.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Stratton SJ. Quasi-Experimental Design (Pre-Test and Post-Test Studies) in Prehospital and Disaster Research. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(6):573–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. The World Bank. Individuals using the Internet (% of population) - West Bank and Gaza Data. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS. Accessed January 7, 2024.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all participants who took part into the study.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nasser Abu-El-Noor and Bettina Bottcher contributed equally as a senior co-author.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Lakeside 7100, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Mohamedraed Elshami

  2. Ministry of Health, Gaza, Palestine

    Mohamedraed Elshami, Lina Kassab, Hala Abu Selmiyh & Refqa Najeeb Skaik

  3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Hanan Abukmail

  4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Hanan Abukmail

  5. International Medical Corps, Gaza, Palestine

    Hanan Abukmail

  6. Faculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine

    Mariam Thalji, Afnan Radaydeh, Salma Khader, Aya Nammari, Tumodir Abdallah, Shahd Idais, Zakia Abo-Hajouj, Haya Hebi, Saba Rjoub, Hadeel Ayesh & Toqa Rjoub

  7. Almakassed Hospital, Jerusalem, Palestine

    Ibrahim Al-Slaibi

  8. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), Gaza, Palestine

    Mohammed Alser

  9. Faculty of Graduate Studies, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

    Alaa Alfuqaha

  10. Faculty of Medicine, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine

    Lana Khatib & Manar Zamel

  11. Faculty of Pharmacy, Alazhar University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Nour Fannoun & Shurouq I. Albarqi

  12. Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Bisan Ahmad, Nour Abed, Rawan Zakout & Bettina Bottcher

  13. Faculty of Dentistry and Dental Surgery, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine

    Hiba Khrishi, Ghaid Tanbouz & Lama Hammoud

  14. Faculty of Medicine, Alazhar University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Deniz Elhussaini & Zaina Alqudwa

  15. Hebron Governmental Hospital, Hebron, Palestine

    Shahd Idais

  16. Alia Hospital, Hebron, Palestine

    Ma’alem Hajajreh

  17. Al-Shiffa Hospital, Gaza, Palestine

    Amany Alser

  18. Faculty of Nursing, Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza, Palestine

    Nasser Abu-El-Noor

Authors
  1. Mohamedraed Elshami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanan Abukmail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariam Thalji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ibrahim Al-Slaibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammed Alser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Afnan Radaydeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alaa Alfuqaha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Salma Khader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lana Khatib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Nour Fannoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Bisan Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Lina Kassab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Hiba Khrishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Deniz Elhussaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Nour Abed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Aya Nammari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Tumodir Abdallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Zaina Alqudwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Shahd Idais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Ghaid Tanbouz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Ma’alem Hajajreh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Hala Abu Selmiyh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Zakia Abo-Hajouj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Haya Hebi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Manar Zamel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Refqa Najeeb Skaik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Lama Hammoud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Saba Rjoub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Hadeel Ayesh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Toqa Rjoub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Rawan Zakout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Amany Alser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. Shurouq I. Albarqi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  34. Nasser Abu-El-Noor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  35. Bettina Bottcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ME contributed to the design of the study, data analysis, data interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. HA and MT contributed to the design of the study, data collection, data interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. IA, MA, AR, AA, SK, LK, NF, BA, LiK, HK, DE, NA, AN, TA, ZA, SI, GT, MH, HAS, ZAH, HH, MZ, RS, LH, SR, HaA, TR, RZ, AmA, and SIA contributed to the design of the study, data collection, data entry, and data interpretation. NAE and BB contributed to the design of the study, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, and supervision of the work. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Each author has participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamedraed Elshami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Prior to data collection, ethical approval had been sought and obtained from the Research Ethics Committee at the Islamic University of Gaza, the Human Resources Development department at the Palestinian Ministry of Health, and the Helsinki Committee in the Gaza Strip. The study along with its purpose and objectives were thoroughly explained to the participants and they were well informed that their participation is completely voluntary. A written informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to filling out the questionnaire, and data were collected and reported anonymously.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elshami, M., Abukmail, H., Thalji, M. et al. Myths and common misbeliefs about cervical cancer causation among Palestinian women: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 24, 189 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17733-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-17733-5

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us