Skip to main content
Download PDF

The association between serum magnesium and chronic kidney disease in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

BMC Public Health volume 24, Article number: 187 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Magnesium (Mg) is both an essential macro-element and a known catalyst, and it plays a vital role in various physiological activities and mechanisms in relation to chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, epidemiological evidence involving this is limited and not entirely consistent. This study aims to explore the association of serum Mg concentrations with the risk of CKD among general Chinese adults.

Methods

A total of 8,277 Chinese adults were included in the wave of 2009 from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). The primary outcome was the risk of CKD, which was defined as the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the relationship of serum Mg concentrations with the risk of CKD.

Results

Included were 8,277 individuals, with an overall CKD prevalence of 11.8% (n = 977). Compared with the first quartile of serum Mg, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for participants in the second, third, and fourth quartiles of serum Mg were 0.74 (0.58, 0.93), 0.87 (0.69, 1.11) and 1.29 (1.03, 1.61), respectively. Similar results were observed in our several sensitivity analyses. Restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrated a nonlinear (similar “J”-shaped) association between serum Mg concentrations and the risk of CKD (Pnonlinearity <0.001), with a threshold at around a serum Mg value of 2.2 mg/dL.

Conclusions

Our results suggested a similar “J”-shaped association between serum Mg concentration and the risk of CKD among Chinese adults. Further large prospective studies are needed to verify these findings.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasing and leading public health challenge worldwide, as the primary contributor to global mortality and morbidity [1]. Nearly 10% of adults worldwide suffer from CKD, resulting in nearly 35.0 million years of healthy life lost and 1.2 million deaths every year [2]. Therefore, it is of vital importance to recognize relevant and adaptable risk factors for the delay or prevention of CKD.

Magnesium (Mg), as the second most important intracellular positive ion and the fourth abundant cation in the human body [3, 4], has been linked to many diseases, including hypertension [5], cardiovascular disease [6], diabetes [7], anemia [8], as well as CKD [9]. Several epidemiologic studies have been conducted to dissect the connection between serum Mg status and CKD. For instance, the ARIC study suggested that lower serum Mg concentrations were independently linked to greater risks of CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among 13,226 middle-aged participants [10]. In a cohort study involving 1,650 Western European CKD cases, Van Laecke et al. reported that lower serum Mg concentrations were linked to a more rapid decline in kidney function [11]. The HANDLS study found a higher risk of fast renal function deterioration among 1,252 African-American and Caucasian participants with reduced dietary Mg consumption [12]. Although the above-mentioned research has revealed that serum Mg is negatively correlated with the occurrence and prognosis of CKD, these studies are limited to European and American populations. In addition, Azem et al. [13] revealed that either hyper- or hypo-magnesemia was substantially linked to a growing risk of CKD progression among 10,568 patients with CKD stage 3 and 4. Ortega et al. [14] found that serum Mg was not a reliable indicator of cardiovascular events or overall mortality among 70 non-dialysis patients with advanced CKD. Several studies have also indicated an association between Mg status and survival in ESRD patients [15,16,17]. Therefore, until now, the relationships between Mg and the onset, development, and prognosis of CKD are limited, inconsistent, and not well established, particularly in the Chinese population.

In this context, we sought to explore the relationships between serum Mg status and CKD in a nationally representative sample of Chinese adults using data from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS).

Methods

Study population and design

The CHNS is an ongoing national longitudinal survey to investigate health and the nutritional status of Chinese residents [18]. A multistage random clustering process was utilized to sample 288 communities in 12 provinces of China by 2011 (i.e., Beijing, Heilongjiang, Liaoning, Henan, Shandong, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Hubei, Guangxi, Hunan, Chongqing, and Guizhou) [19], which were stratified by income using State Statistical Office definitions. All participants voluntarily signed informed consent and this study was supported by the institutional review board from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline in conducting and reporting the study [20]. The inclusion criterion was participants who had blood sample collection in the wave of 2009, and the exclusion criterion was individuals who were aged < 18 years old and had missing information. Finally, a total of 8,277 participants from the CHNS 2009 were eligible for inclusion.

Laboratory measurements

Fasting blood samples were collected in local laboratories according to consensus guidelines with strict quality control, then transported to a national central lab in Beijing for future testing [18]. Serum Mg and creatinine were analyzed using the Xylidyl blue colorimetric method (Randox, UK) and a standard Picric acid method (Randox, UK), respectively. The measured serum Mg concentrations were substituted with the mean concentration ± 3×standard deviation for those with measured concentrations higher/lower than this value [21]. Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and total cholesterol (TC) were measured using the enzymatic method (Kyowa, Japan) and the cholesterol oxidase-phenol plus aminophenazone method (CHOD-PAP; Randox, UK), respectively. Serum triacylglycerol (TG) was detected using the glycerol phosphate oxidase phenol 4-aminoantipyrine peroxidase (GPO-PAP) method (Kyowa, Japan). Blood hemoglobin (Hb) was examined using the Coulter volume scatter conductivity (VCS) hematology analyzer (Beckman Coulter, USA).

Ascertainment of CKD

The primary outcome of interest in the current study, CKD, was defined by an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [22, 23]. The eGFR value was calculated from age (in years), sex, and serum creatinine (in mg/dL), using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation [24]. Moreover, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation was also adopted in our sensitivity analysis [25].

Assessment of covariates

Information on age, sex, residential place, education level, self-reported diagnosed fracture/diabetes/hypertension, and lifestyles (e.g., smoking, and drinking) were obtained from a face-to-face interview. We divide the subject’s educational level into 4 categories (no formal education, primary school, middle school, high school or higher) [26, 27]. Individual diet was repeatedly evaluated by a household food inventory survey, and 24-h dietary recalls on three consecutive days were performed to assess individual diets [28]. Dietary nutrient intakes (e.g., caloric, carbohydrate, and protein) were estimated based on the compositions in the China food composition tables (FCTs) and individual dietary consumption data [29]. Height and weight were measured using the standard scheme by trained examiners. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m). BMI cut-off points for overweight and obesity were 24.0 kg/m2 and 28.0 kg/m2 [30] for Chinese adults, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Participants were classified according to the quartiles of serum Mg concentrations (Q1: below 2.16 mg/dL, Q2: 2.16–2.28 mg/dL, Q3: 2.28–2.43 mg/dL, and Q4: above 2.43 mg/dL). Differences between serum Mg quartile groups in socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated by the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test for categorical variables, respectively.

Based on previous studies [31,32,33], to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of CKD based on quartiles of serum Mg concentrations, 3 multivariable logistic regression models were constructed. Model 1 was a crude model. In model 2, we made age (years), sex (male or female), BMI (< 18.5, 18.5–23.9, 24.0-27.9, or ≥ 28.0 kg/m2), residential place (rural or urban), educational level (no formal education, primary school, middle school, high school or higher), smoking (yes or no), alcohol consumption (yes or no), self-reported diagnosed hypertension, diabetes, or fracture (yes or no), and biochemical indicators (i.e., TC, HDL-C, TG, and Hb) adjustments. In model 3, we further adjusted for dietary consumption (i.e., protein, carbohydrate, and calorie intake), because of the collinearity problem, we did not adjust the variable of fat intake. Tests for trends across Mg quartiles were assessed by including the median values within each group as a continuous variable in separate models [34].

The dose-response relationship of serum Mg with CKD was tested by a 3-knots (i.e., the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentile) restricted cubic spline regression models. Stratified analyses were performed by age (≤ 60 and > 60 years), sex (male and female), BMI (< 18.5, 18.5–23.9, 24.0-27.9, and ≥ 28.0 kg/m2), residential place (rural and urban), educational level (no formal education, primary school, middle school, high school or higher), smoking status (no and yes), alcohol status (no and yes), self-reported diagnosed hypertension, diabetes, and fracture (no and yes), and the significance of interaction was evaluated by the likelihood ratio test.

In order to verify that our findings are reliable, the relationship between quartiles of serum Mg and eGFR calculated from CKD-EPI was analyzed using linear regression models. Besides, we utilized the modified MDRD equation to calculate eGFR, then repeated the analyses between quartiles of serum Mg and incident CKD and eGFR. All statistical analyses were conducted using Stata 15.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas) software, and P < 0.05 (two-sided) was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Study participants and baseline characteristics

A total of 10,242 participants were identified from the 2009 wave of CHNS, 9,434 of whom had blood sample collection. After excluding those who were aged < 18 years old (n = 798), and had missing information on diet (n = 133), height or weight (n = 158), and the other biomarkers (n = 68). Finally, the current analysis comprised 8,277 people altogether. Details regarding the participant’s selection are shown in Fig. 1. Table 1 presents the participants’ characteristics. The quartile of serum Mg is as follows, Q1: below 2.16 mg/dL (0.90 mmol/L), Q2: 2.16–2.28 mg/dL (0.90–0.95 mmol/L), Q3: 2.28–2.43 mg/dL (0.95–1.01 mmol/L), and Q4: above 2.43 mg/dL (1.01mmol/L). The average age of the 8,277 participants in the current study was 51.3 years, 3,865 (46.7%) of them were men, and 977 (11.8%) of them were diagnosed with CKD. Subjects who had higher Mg concentrations were more likely to be older, male, lived in urban, smokers, drinkers, and obese; and had higher educational levels and a history of self-reported diagnosed hypertension. Moreover, different concentrations of serum Mg were also accompanied by significant differences in various biochemical indicators (i.e., TC, HDL-C, TG, and Hb) and dietary intake (i.e., caloric, carbohydrate, and protein) (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of participant selection. CHNS, China Health and Nutrition Survey; CKD, Chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the study population according to serum magnesium concentrations in CHNS 2009.1
Full size table

Association between serum Mg and CKD

Table 2 presents the relationship between the quartiles of serum Mg concentrations and CKD in the logistic regressions. Compared with the first quartile, the crude ORs (95% CIs) for CKD associated with serum Mg concentration in the second and fourth quartiles were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.87) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.65), respectively. Consistent results were observed in model 2, which was corrected for age, sex, BMI, residential place, educational level, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, Hb, HDL-C, TC, TG, self-reported diagnosed hypertension, diabetes, and fracture. Model 3 was corrected as for model 2 and additionally adjusted for dietary consumption (i.e., protein intake, carbohydrate intake, and calorie intake), and the adjusted ORs (95% CIs) from bottom to top serum Mg categories were 1.00 (reference), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.93), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.61), respectively. The restricted cubic spline curves further demonstrated a curvilinear (similar “J”-shaped) association between serum Mg concentrations and CKD (Pnon−linearity <0.001), with a threshold at around a serum Mg value of 2.2 mg/dL (Fig. 2).

Table 2 ORs (95% CIs) for chronic kidney disease according to serum magnesium concentrations in CHNS 2009
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Adjusted OR (95% CIs) for chronic kidney disease by serum magnesium concentrations.1

1Results were adjusted for age (continuous), sex (male or female), body mass index (< 18.5, 18.5–23.9, 24.0-27.9, or ≥ 28.0 kg/m2), residential place (rural or urban), educational level (no formal education, primary school, middle school, high school or higher), smoking status (yes or no), alcohol status (yes or no), comorbidities (i.e., hypertension, diabetes, and fracture), biochemical indicators (i.e., total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, and hemoglobin), and dietary consumptions (i.e., protein, carbohydrate, and calorie intake). The red solid lines represent the ORs, and the black dashed lines are 95% CIs. CI, Confidence interval; OR, Odds ratio

Full size image

Subgroups analyses and sensitivity analyses

Figure 3 presents the results of stratification analyses, and similar results were obtained as analyses were stratified by age, sex, BMI, household registration, educational level, current smoking status, current alcohol consumption, self-reported diagnosed hypertension, diabetes, or fracture. No significant interaction was detected between serum Mg concentrations and these stratifying variables (all Pinteraction >0.05), except for age (Pinteraction <0.001).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Adjusted OR (95% CIs) for chronic kidney disease by serum magnesium concentrations in subgroups analyses.1

1Results were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, current smoking status, alcohol drinking status, educational level, residence, history of diabetes, hypertension, and fracture, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride, hemoglobin, and dietary consumptions (i.e., protein, carbohydrate, and calorie intake), and stratified variables were not included in the relevant models. CI, Confidence interval; OR, Odds ratio; Q, quartile.

Full size image

In the full-adjusted linear regression model, the coefficients (95% CIs) of eGFR associated with the third quartile and fourth quartile of serum Mg concentration versus the first quartile was − 1.61 (95% CI: -2.38, -0.84) and − 3.62 (95% CI: -4.39, -2.84), respectively (Supplementary Table 1). These associations were still observed in the linear regression and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses when we used the MDRD equation to generate eGFR (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

Discussion

A similar “J”-shaped associations between serum Mg concentrations and CKD were discovered in this relatively large-scale, nationwide study among the general Chinese population. The correlation was independent of traditional risk factors, such as lifestyle factors, biochemical indicators, BMI, and dietary consumption. A variety of stratified analyses and sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of our findings.

The concentrations of serum Mg (median/mean: 0.95 mmol/L) in the present study were slightly higher than those described in NHANES I study in the U.S. (median: 0.85 mmol/L) [35], and from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort study in the UK (males: 0.82 mmol/L; females: 0.80 mmol/L) [36], while were slightly lower than that reported in the rural areas of the southwest of China (median: 1.07 mmol/L) [37]. The difference in serum Mg levels among these regions may be attributed to the inclusion of age limit, dietary preference, drinking water, and race specificity [35, 38, 39].

Mg is frequently active in numerous pathophysiological changes and molecular mechanisms in the human body. As a critical cofactor, Mg could be helpful to exert biological functions in any reaction powered by adenosine triphosphate (ATP); as a phosphate binder, Mg could be helpful to decrease hyperphosphatemia and vascular calcification [40, 41]; as a calcium channel antagonist, Mg could involve in regulating various activity accompanied by intracellular calcium concentration fluxes, such as contraction of muscles, release of insulin [42]. Thus, Mg disorder, probably owing to an excessive dietary intake of Mg, pathological problems (e.g., abnormal renal wasting), or excessive use of drugs (e.g., diuretics) [43], would give rise to serious consequences or dramatic effects on metabolism. Consistent with this notion, our current study showed a similar “J”-shaped relationship between serum Mg levels and CKD among 8,277 Chinese adults, which indicated that either serum Mg deficiency or surplus might be linked to CKD. The risk of CKD development significantly decreased with the increment of serum Mg in participants when serum Mg < 2.2 mg/dL, but if serum Mg ≥ 2.2 mg/dL, the relationship between them developed in the opposite direction. Similar to our study, in 10,568 patients with CKD stage 3 and 4, Azem et al. [13] reported that either hyper- or hypo-magnesemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of CKD progression. In a cohort study with 142,555 hemodialysis patients, Sakaguchi et al. [44]. found that the risk of all-cause mortality was much higher in sextiles 1–3 and 6 of Mg concentration, which suggested that there may be an optimal concentration of Mg. Therefore, it could be speculated that the concentration of Mg should be controlled at an appropriate range, which needed to be performed and verified in future studies. In addition, we found that the association between serum Mg and CKD was not significant in older individuals who were above 60 years, perhaps since serum Mg concentrations generally decrease with age due to uneven diet, chronic diseases or side effects of medication, while the risk of developing CKD increased with age [45]，then this relationship was weakened [46].

The relevant mechanisms underlying the similar “J”-shaped relationships between serum Mg concentrations and CKD remain incompletely clear, and several possibilities could be proposed to decipher our findings. Firstly, Mg may involve the prevention of nephrocalcinosis, inhibition of phosphate-mediated apoptosis of tubular cells and calcification of renal arteries, and suppression of tubular calcium phosphate crystallization, which may protect against phosphate-induced kidney damage. In addition, tubular dysfunction and interstitial fibrosis could contribute to the loss of Mg [47, 48]. Moreover, matured calciprotein particles have the capacity to induce vascular calcification, and recent studies have shown that Mg could prevent the maturation of calciprotein particles [49], and these may be the basics that underlie the anti-calcification properties of Mg. Secondly, Mg exercises the functions of protein metabolism and energy synthesis. Therefore, Mg deficiency may induce the development of CKD by reducing protein synthesis and energy metabolism of renal reparative cells. Thirdly, the concentrations of antioxidants (e.g., selenium and vitamin C) are decreased in the context of Mg deficiency [50], which was closely related to promoting oxidative stress. In addition, related studies conducted in vitro on endothelial cells have shown that a low Mg medium promotes inflammation and oxidative stress, and induces the expression of proatherothrombotic molecules such plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [51], and Mg deficiency was found to be linked to endothelial dysfunction [52], therefore, we reasonably speculate that Mg may have protective effects on endothelium, and Mg deficiency could be responsible for endothelial dysfunction and vascular sclerosis of renal vessels, accelerating the progression of kidney damage. Finally, previous studies also have shown that chronic inflammation is crucial to the development of CKD [53, 54], thus abnormal Mg levels (deficiencies or excesses) may aggravate inflammation-related renal injury.

The large sample size and population-based design of our study were its major strengths, allowing us to perform a series of stratifications and the results were reliable and generalizable to the general population in China. However, our research has certain limitations as well. First, we were unable to establish the causal link between serum Mg and CKD because of the cross-sectional nature of this study. It is still needed to affirm whether the reduced renal function is a crucial risk element for hypermagnesemia or not, maybe the hypermagnesemia results in the faster development of CKD or the compensatory protective elevation of serum Mg for delaying the progression of CKD. Secondly, serum Mg concentrations were assessed at a single time point, thus the measured data may not be objective to reflect the whole life-course activity, and there is no more relevant available data on Mg intake in this database, so we cannot conduct subsequent causal analyses. Thirdly, due to a lack of data on the severity of CKD, we could not determine whether these associations differed by the severity of CKD; while the prevalence of CKD in our study is comparable to that estimated in global analysis (8.0–16.0%) [55]. Finally, although we have considered several potential confounders, including various lifestyles and dietary variables, additional unmeasured confounders cannot be fully excluded.

Conclusions

In this relatively large-scale, national study, we found a similar “J”-shaped association between serum Mg concentrations and CKD among Chinese adults. Our findings highlight the possibility of maintaining the optimal serum Mg concentrations for the management of CKD, and present the feasibility that Mg might be an intervention target for the treatment of CKD.

Data availability

Data of CHNS can be viewed and obtained from the following website: https://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/china, and further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

TC:

Total cholesterol

HDL-C:

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Mg:

Magnesium

HT:

Hypertension

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, Adebayo OM, Afarideh M, Agarwal SK, Agudelo-Botero M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie Y, Bowe B, Mokdad AH, Xian H, Yan Y, Li T, Maddukuri G, Tsai CY, Floyd T, Al-Aly Z. Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int. 2018;94(3):567–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Takaya J, Higashino H, Kobayashi Y. Intracellular magnesium and insulin resistance. Magnes Res. 2004;17(2):126–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gröber U, Schmidt J, Kisters K. Magnesium in Prevention and Therapy. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):8199–226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Dominguez L, Veronese N, Barbagallo M. Magnesium and hypertension in Old Age. Nutrients 2020, 13(1).

  6. Massy ZA, Drüeke TB. Magnesium and cardiovascular complications of chronic kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(7):432–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong JY, Xun P, He K, Qin LQ. Magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):2116–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi Z, Hu X, He K, Yuan B, Garg M. Joint association of magnesium and iron intake with anemia among Chinese adults. Nutrition. 2008;24(10):977–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Galán Carrillo I, Vega A, Goicoechea M, Shabaka A, Gatius S, Abad S, López-Gómez JM. Impact of serum magnesium levels on kidney and Cardiovascular Prognosis and Mortality in CKD patients. J Ren Nutr. 2021;31(5):494–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tin A, Grams ME, Maruthur NM, Astor BC, Couper D, Mosley TH, Selvin E, Coresh J, Kao WH. Results from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study suggest that low serum magnesium is associated with incident kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;87(4):820–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Laecke S, Nagler EV, Verbeke F, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Hypomagnesemia and the risk of death and GFR decline in chronic kidney disease. Am J Med. 2013;126(9):825–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rebholz CM, Tin A, Liu Y, Kuczmarski MF, Evans MK, Zonderman AB, Crews DC. Dietary magnesium and kidney function decline: the healthy aging in neighborhoods of diversity across the Life Span Study. Am J Nephrol. 2016;44(5):381–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Azem R, Daou R, Bassil E, Anvari EM, Taliercio JJ, Arrigain S, Schold JD, Vachharajani T, Nally J, Na Khoul GN. Serum magnesium, mortality and disease progression in chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ortega O, Rodriguez I, Cobo G, Hinostroza J, Gallar P, Mon C, Ortiz M, Herrero JC, Di Gioia C, Oliet A, et al. Lack of influence of serum magnesium levels on overall mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. ISRN Nephrol. 2013;2013:191786.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ishimura E, Okuno S, Yamakawa T, Inaba M, Nishizawa Y. Serum magnesium concentration is a significant predictor of mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Magnes Res. 2007;20(4):237–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Markaki A, Kyriazis J, Stylianou K, Fragkiadakis GA, Perakis K, Margioris AN, Ganotakis ES, Daphnis E. The role of serum magnesium and calcium on the association between adiponectin levels and all-cause mortality in end-stage renal disease patients. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e52350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sato H, Takeuchi Y, Matsuda K, Saito A, Kagaya S, Fukami H, Ojima Y, Nagasawa T. Evaluation of the Predictive Value of the serum calcium-magnesium ratio for all-cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Incident Dialysis patients. Cardiorenal Med. 2017;8(1):50–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Popkin BM, Du S, Zhai F, Zhang B. Cohort Profile: the China Health and Nutrition Survey–monitoring and understanding socio-economic and health change in China, 1989–2011. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(6):1435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang B, Zhai FY, Du SF, Popkin BM. The China Health and Nutrition Survey, 1989–2011. Obes Rev. 2014;15(Suppl 1):2–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghaferi AA, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. STROBE reporting guidelines for Observational studies. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(6):577–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen HG, Lu Q, Tu ZZ, Chen YJ, Sun B, Hou J, Xiong CL, Wang YX, Meng TQ, Pan A. Identifying windows of susceptibility to essential elements for semen quality among 1428 healthy men screened as potential sperm donors. Environ Int. 2021;155:106586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xu X, Qin X, Li Y, Sun D, Wang J, Liang M, Wang B, Huo Y, Hou FF. Efficacy of folic acid therapy on the progression of chronic kidney disease: the renal substudy of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1443–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis CE, Fine LJ, Beddhu S, Cheung AK, Cushman WC, Cutler JA, Evans GW, Johnson KC, Kitzman DW, Oparil S, et al. Final report of a trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(20):1921–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Levin A, Stevens PE. Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney Int. 2014;85(1):49–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brañez-Condorena A, Goicochea-Lugo S, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Becerra-Chauca N, Failoc-Rojas VE, Herrera-Añazco P, Taype-Rondan A. Performance of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations for estimating glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of latin American studies. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021;139(5):452–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, Zheng D, Li Z, Wu Z, Feng W, Cao X, Wang J, Gao Q, Li X, Wang W, et al. Association of depressive symptoms with Incident Cardiovascular diseases in Middle-aged and older Chinese adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1916591.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Q, Han M, Li M, Huang X, Feng R, Li W, Chen J, He H, Zheng W, Hu Z, et al. Shift in prevalence and systemic inflammation levels from NAFLD to MAFLD: a population-based cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2023;22(1):185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Liu M, Zhou C, Zhang Z, He P, Li Q, Liu C, Qin X. Inverse association between dietary vitamin A intake and new-onset hypertension. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2868–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guo X, Gao J, Meng X, Wang J, Zhang Z, Song Q, Hu K, Sun C, Li Y. Association of Dietary Calcium Intake with Bone Health and Chronic diseases: two prospective cohort studies in China. Front Nutr. 2021;8:683918.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou BF. Effect of body mass index on all-cause mortality and incidence of cardiovascular diseases–report for meta-analysis of prospective studies open optimal cut-off points of body mass index in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2002;15(3):245–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Farsinejad-Marj M, Saneei P, Esmaillzadeh A. Dietary magnesium intake, bone mineral density and risk of fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(4):1389–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bover J, Bailone L, López-Báez V, Benito S, Ciceri P, Galassi A, Cozzolino M. Osteoporosis, bone mineral density and CKD-MBD: treatment considerations. J Nephrol. 2017;30(5):677–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. . In: Chronic Kidney Disease (Partial Update): Early Identification and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease in Adults in Primary and Secondary Care edn. London; 2014.

  34. Ye YX, Chen HG, Sun B, Chen YJ, Duan P, Meng TQ, Xiong CL, Wang YX, Pan A. Associations between depression, oxidative stress, and semen quality among 1,000 healthy men screened as potential sperm donors. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(1):86–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lowenstein FW, Stanton MF. Serum magnesium levels in the United States, 1971–1974. J Am Coll Nutr. 1986;5(4):399–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hayhoe RPG, Lentjes MAH, Mulligan AA, Luben RN, Khaw KT, Welch AA. Cross-sectional associations of dietary and circulating magnesium with skeletal muscle mass in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(1):317–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang J, Yin H, Zhu X, Xiang R, Miao Y, Zhang Y, Song Y, Chen J, Zhang L. Effects of multi-metal exposure on the risk of diabetes mellitus among people aged 40–75 years in rural areas in southwest China. J Diabetes Investig. 2022;13(8):1412–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Rubenowitz E, Axelsson G, Rylander R. Magnesium in drinking water and body magnesium status measured using an oral loading test. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1998;58(5):423–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bialostosky K, Wright JD, Kennedy-Stephenson J, McDowell M, Johnson CL. Dietary intake of macronutrients, micronutrients, and other dietary constituents: United States 1988-94. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;245:1–158.

    Google Scholar 

  40. O’Donovan R, Baldwin D, Hammer M, Moniz C, Parsons V. Substitution of aluminium salts by magnesium salts in control of dialysis hyperphosphataemia. Lancet. 1986;1(8486):880–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Spiegel DM, Farmer B, Smits G, Chonchol M. Magnesium carbonate is an effective phosphate binder for chronic hemodialysis patients: a pilot study. J Ren Nutr. 2007;17(6):416–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sanders GT, Huijgen HJ, Sanders R. Magnesium in disease: a review with special emphasis on the serum ionized magnesium. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1999;37(11–12):1011–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahmed F, Mohammed A. Magnesium: the Forgotten Electrolyte-A Review on Hypomagnesemia. Med Sci (Basel) 2019, 7(4).

  44. Sakaguchi Y, Fujii N, Shoji T, Hayashi T, Rakugi H, Isaka Y. Hypomagnesemia is a significant predictor of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 2014;85(1):174–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Macías Ruiz MDC, Cuenca Bermejo L, Veronese N, Fernández Villalba E, González Cuello AM, Kublickiene K, Raparelli V, Norris CM, Kautzky-Willer A, Pilote L et al. Magnesium in kidney function and disease-implications for aging and Sex-A narrative review. Nutrients 2023, 15(7).

  46. Li Y, Ning Y, Shen B, Shi Y, Song N, Fang Y, Ding X. Temporal trends in prevalence and mortality for chronic kidney disease in China from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Clin Kidney J. 2023;16(2):312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sakaguchi Y, Iwatani H, Hamano T, Tomida K, Kawabata H, Kusunoki Y, Shimomura A, Matsui I, Hayashi T, Tsubakihara Y, et al. Magnesium modifies the association between serum phosphate and the risk of progression to end-stage kidney disease in patients with non-diabetic chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88(4):833–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sakaguchi Y. The emerging role of magnesium in CKD. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2022;26(5):379–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ter Braake AD, Eelderink C, Zeper LW, Pasch A, Bakker SJL, de Borst MH, Hoenderop JGJ, de Baaij JHF. Calciprotein particle inhibition explains magnesium-mediated protection against vascular calcification. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(5):765–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kostov K, Halacheva L. Role of Magnesium Deficiency in promoting atherosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffening as risk factors for hypertension. Int J Mol Sci 2018, 19(6).

  51. Maier JA. Endothelial cells and magnesium: implications in atherosclerosis. Clin Sci (Lond). 2012;122(9):397–407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Wolf FI, Trapani V, Simonacci M, Ferré S, Maier JA. Magnesium deficiency and endothelial dysfunction: is oxidative stress involved? Magnes Res. 2008;21(1):58–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tonelli M, Sacks F, Pfeffer M, Jhangri GS, Curhan G. Biomarkers of inflammation and progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2005;68(1):237–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Shankar A, Sun L, Klein BE, Lee KE, Muntner P, Nieto FJ, Tsai MY, Cruickshanks KJ, Schubert CR, Brazy PC, et al. Markers of inflammation predict the long-term risk of developing chronic kidney disease: a population-based cohort study. Kidney Int. 2011;80(11):1231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Jha V, Garcia-Garcia G, Iseki K, Li Z, Naicker S, Plattner B, Saran R, Wang AY-M, Yang C-W. Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives. The Lancet. 2013;382(9888):260–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants and all the people involved in the CHNS study.

Funding

Heng-Gui Chen was funded by grants from Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province (No.2022J05136) and funding from the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (No.YJRC3883); Yanfang Xu was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82070720, No.81870472); Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province (No.2020J02020); Fujian Province Finance Project (No.2020B009); Outstanding Young Talents Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University (YJCQN-A-XYF2021).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jing-Zhi Xie and Yuanyuan Huang contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.

  2. Heng-Gui Chen and Yanfang Xu contributed equally to this work and shared the last authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nephrology, Blood Purification Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Chronic Kidney Disease, Fujian Medical University, Chazhong Road 20, 350005, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

    Jing-Zhi Xie, Zi-Gui Zheng, Bing-Jing Jiang & Yanfang Xu

  2. Department of Nephrology, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, National Regional Medical Center, Fujian Medical University, 350212, Fuzhou, China

    Jing-Zhi Xie, Zi-Gui Zheng, Bing-Jing Jiang & Yanfang Xu

  3. Department of Public Health, Fujian Normal University Hospital, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

    Yuanyuan Huang

  4. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

    Xiao-Feng Zheng, Ruimei Feng, Xiao-Yun Li & Shanshan Du

  5. Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, No. 1 Xuefu North Rd, 350122, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China

    Heng-Gui Chen

Authors
  1. Jing-Zhi Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuanyuan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiao-Feng Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ruimei Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiao-Yun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zi-Gui Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Bing-Jing Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shanshan Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Heng-Gui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yanfang Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YX and HGC designed the research, reviewed, and edited the manuscript; JZX performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript; YH and XFZ validated the data and wrote the manuscript; XYL, RF, ZGZ, BJJ, and SD reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors provided critical revisions of the draft and approved the submitted draft. The corresponding author affirms that all authors meet authorship criteria.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Heng-Gui Chen or Yanfang Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was supported by the institutional review board from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. All participants provided written informed consent. All methods of this study were performed following relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, JZ., Huang, Y., Zheng, XF. et al. The association between serum magnesium and chronic kidney disease in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 24, 187 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17615-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17615-2

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us