Skip to main content
Download PDF

Additive interactions between obesity and insulin resistance on hypertension in a Chinese rural population

BMC Public Health volume 23, Article number: 2519 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Adiposity and insulin resistance (IR) are closely associated with hypertension; however, the role of interactions between obesity phenotypes and IR in hypertension is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the interactions of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and body fat percentage (BF%) with IR on hypertension risk.

Methods

We analyzed data from 4888 participants (mean age 57 years, 41.2% men) in the China Northwest Natural Population Cohort, Ningxia Project. BMI, WC, and BF% were determined using bioelectrical impedance analysis devices. IR was estimated using a homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA-IR). Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between HOMA-IR and hypertension risk. We calculated the relative excess risk and attributable proportion with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess whether adiposity phenotypes modified the effect of HOMA-IR on hypertension risk.

Results

The crude prevalence of hypertension was 52.2%. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratio of HOMA-IR was 1.80 (95% CI: 1.23–2.65) for the risk of hypertension in the highest versus the lowest quartiles, but this association became marginal in models further adjusting for BMI, WC, and BF% (P for trend = 0.056). Relative excess risk and attributable proportion for interaction between high HOMA-IR and high BF% were 0.32 (0.04–0.59) and 0.33 (0.06–0.60), respectively. Additionally, high truncal and leg BF% and high HOMA-IR accounted for the hypertension risk in women, but not in men. We did not observe any significant interactions between BMI or WC and HOMA-IR on hypertension.

Conclusion

BF% modified the association between IR and increased risk of hypertension in women with high truncal and leg BF%, but not in men.

Peer Review reports

Background

The global prevalence of hypertension is rising. In 2019, approximately 12.78 million people worldwide had hypertension [1], leading to a large global burden of cardiovascular disease and premature death [2]. Previous studies have demonstrated that insulin resistance (IR) [3], obesity [4], and hypertension are closely interrelated.

Different measures of obesity have been defined, including the well-recognized body mass index (BMI) reflecting total body mass[BMI~(weight/height**2)], waist circumference (WC) reflecting abdominal obesity, and body fat percentage (BF%). Considerable evidence from longitudinal studies confirms that WC and BMI are significantly associated with an increased risk of hypertension in diverse populations [4, 5]. Moreover, obesity plays a role in the pathogenesis of IR [6, 7]. As summarized in a meta-analysis, obesity indicators such as WC and BMI were most commonly used for variable adjustments when analyzing the relationship between IR and hypertension [3]. Some researchers found that obesity may have a mediating effect on the association between IR and hypertension [8, 9], but others reported that obesity does not modify this relationship [10]. Therefore, the role of obesity in the relationship between IR and hypertension based on the results of existing studies remains controversial. Recent studies have suggested that BF% is significantly associated with risk of hypertension [11, 12]. It is worth noting that a Korean cohort study revealed BF% as a predictor of hypertension, even in nonobese individuals who were defined based on BMI and WC criteria [13]. However, no study has evaluated the role of BF% on the association between IR and hypertension. IR and obesity are risk factors for hypertension, that often coexist. Only a few studies have reported an interaction between obesity and IR in hypertension. A review reported that obesity, particularly if defined by WC, appears to have an important influence on the IR–hypertension relationship [14], and a study in postmenopausal women revealed a significant interaction between WC and log homeostasis model assessment-IR (HOMA-IR) on systolic blood pressure (SBP) [15]. Results from a prospective cohort study, using IR to define unhealthy metabolic statuses, found that overweight and obese participants in IR groups showed a significant and independent risk of hypertension [16]. Zhang et al. [17] have shown that adiposity in the development of hypertension is modified by IR. Therefore, obesity and IR are interconnected in various ways. The role of the interactions between different obesity indicators and IR on hypertension risk remains unclear.

Although the coexistence of IR and obesity as major risk factors for hypertension has been widely documented, Chinese rural populations may show different associations. Herein, we aimed to assess the association between IR and hypertension in a Chinese rural population and further explored the interactions between different obesity indicators (WC, BMI, and BF%) and IR on hypertension risk.

Materials and methods

Study population

This study was derived from the China Northwest Natural Population Cohort, Ningxia Project (CNC-NX), an ongoing population-based prospective cohort study. The CNC-NX protocol has been previously reported in detail [18]. Briefly, 15,802 participants (age range 35–74 years) from 45 villages in Wuzhong and Shizuishan City in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of China were enrolled at baseline between March 2018 and May 2019. Demographic characteristics and anthropometric and biochemical measurements were obtained from all participants. Of these 15,802 participants, approximately 30% (5300 participants) were randomly selected comprising a representative subcohort. Among these 5300 individuals, we excluded 73 with missing data on fasting insulin levels, 117 with missing lipid parameters, 75 with missing blood pressure data, and 147 with other missing variables. Therefore, 4888 participants were included in our analysis.

General information and anthropometric measurements

Information on general characteristics (e.g., age, sex, educational status, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, disease history, medication history) was extracted by trained research assistants from questionnaires. The body height was measured without shoes. BMI, WC, and BF% were estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) devices (InBody 370 system, Biospace, Korea) according to standard operating guidelines. The participants removed outer garments and stood barefoot on the BIA device, which passed small electrical currents through the body to estimate body composition. SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured using an OMRON automatic monitor (OMRON-7124, Omron Corporation, Japan) after the participants had rested for at least 5 min. Two consecutive readings were obtained and the average of the two readings was calculated as the blood pressure value for analysis.

Biochemical measurements

Blood samples were collected from the participants between 6:00 and 8:00 a.m. after 8–12 h of fasting. Biochemical indicators were measured using a biochemical autoanalyzer (Mindray BS-430, Shenzhen, China). Fasting insulin levels were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer (Mindray CL-2000i, Shenzhen, China). IR was estimated using the HOMA-IR and calculated using the following formula: HOMA-IR = fasting glucose (mmol/L) × fasting insulin (mIU/mL)/22.5 [19].

Definitions

Hypertension was defined as SBP ≥ 140 mmHg, DBP ≥ 90 mmHg, self-reported hypertension, or current use of blood pressure-lowering medication. Obesity was defined as: (1) WC ≥ 90 cm for men and ≥ 85 cm for women, (2) BMI ≥ 30 (kg/m2), and (3) BF% ≥25% in men and ≥ 35% in women [20]. IR was defined in the present study as an HOMA-IR value above the 75th percentile (> 2.59).

Statistical analysis

Participant characteristics were described according to the presence or absence of hypertension. Except for insulin levels and HOMA-IR, which are presented as the median, other continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Nonparametric tests or t-tests were used to compare differences between the non-hypertension and hypertension groups, where appropriate. Categorical variables such as sex, education status, cigarette smoking, and alcohol intake are presented as frequencies (%) and were compared using the chi-square test. A binary logistic regression model adjusted for related potential confounders was used to examine the association between HOMA-IR and hypertension, especially in Model 4 with added WC, BMI, and BF%, to test whether different obesity indicators affect the relationship between HOMA-IR and hypertension. Test for trends based on variables containing median values for each quartile. In addition, we assessed the additive interaction based on Hosmer et al. [21] to calculate the relative excess risk (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP) due to interaction if the 95% confidence interval (CI) did not include 0, suggesting that significant interactions exist. These parameters have been proposed as interaction measures in epidemiologic studies [22]. All data were analyzed using SPSS (version 23.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) and R software (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria), and P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

We included 4888 participants with a mean age of 57.38 years. The characteristics of the hypertension and non-hypertension groups are shown in Table 1. Compared to participants with hypertension, those without hypertension tended to be younger (mean age: 60.03 vs. 54.49 years). Participants with hypertension had higher HOMA-IR, WC, BMI, WHR, BF%, SBP, and DBP, as well as higher TG, TC, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and fasting insulin levels, than those without hypertension (all P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in LDL-cholesterol levels, sex, current smoking status, and current drinking status between the two groups.

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants
Full size table

Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis of HOMA-IR and hypertension

Table 2 shows the associations between HOMA-IR and hypertension using multivariable logistic regression analyses. HOMA-IR was divided into quartiles (Q1–Q4) with Q1 as the reference. After adjustment for age, sex, educational status, cigarette smoking, drinking, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, FBG, SBP, total cholesterol, and triglyceride in Model 3, the odds ratios (ORs) for hypertension compared to HOMA-IR Q1 were 1.11 (95% CI: 0.80–1.56) for Q2, 1.48 (95% CI: 1.04–2.09) for Q3, and 1.80 (95% CI: 1.23–2.65) for Q4 (P for trend = 0.001). However, the association between HOMA-IR and hypertension risk was not significant after further adjustment for WC, BMI, and BF% (Model 4; P for trend = 0.056). Similar associations were observed when HOMA-IR was included as a continuous variable.

Table 2 Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis of HOMA-IR in relation to hypertension
Full size table

Association between HOMA-IR and risk of hypertension according to WC, BMI, and BF%

We stratified participants by WC, BMI, and BF% to further explore whether different obesity indicators play a mediating role in the relationship between IR and hypertension (Table 3). After adjusting for potential confounders, the relationship between HOMA-IR and hypertension risk was stronger (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.10–3.31, P = 0.022) among participants with higher BF% than among those with normal BF%. However, after stratification according to BMI or WC, the relationship between HOMA-IR and hypertension was not significant after adjusting for potential confounders.

Table 3 Association of HOMA-IR and risk of hypertension according to WC, BMI, and BF%
Full size table

Interaction of HOMA-IR with BF%, WC, and BMI

The measures of the interaction of different obesity indicators with high HOMA-IR are presented in Table 4. RERI and AP for interaction between high HOMA-IR and high BF% were 0.32 (0.04–0.60) and 0.33 (0.06–0.60), respectively, which indicated that the interaction was responsible for 0.32 RERI and accounted for 33% of the hypertension risk. However, we did not observe any significant interactions between obesity, defined according to WC (RERI: 0.15 [-0.23–0.50]; AP: 0.11 [-0.19–0.33]) or BMI (RERI: 0.65 [-0.04–1.46]; AP: 0.34 [-0.07–0.55]) and high HOMA-IR regarding hypertension.

Table 4 Interactions of HOMA-IR with BF%, WC, and BMI
Full size table

Considering the sexual dimorphism in BF% distribution, we also performed subgroup analyses in men and women and divided the parameter BF% into three parts: truncal, leg, and arm BF%. High truncal, leg, and arm BF% values were defined as those above the respective 90th percentiles. Table 5 shows that high truncal BF% and high HOMA-IR accounted for a 40% (95% CI: 7–73%) risk of hypertension in women. Moreover, we found that 0.54 (95% CI: 0.04–1.05) RERI was attributed to the interaction between high leg BF% and high HOMA-IR, accounting for 45% (95% CI: 15–75%) risk of hypertension in women. However in men, there were no significant interactions between total or regional BF% and high HOMA-IR on hypertension.

Table 5 Interactions of HOMA-IR with different distributions of BF% on hypertension by sex
Full size table

Discussion

The major findings of our cross-sectional study suggest that the relationship between IR and the risk of hypertension is mediated by obesity. Moreover, an additive interaction was observed between BF% and IR on hypertension, especially in women with high HOMA-IR and high truncal BF% or high leg BF%.

Obesity plays a role in the onset and progression of IR [6, 23]. The coexistence of IR and obesity results in a substantial increase in the risk of hypertension. Therefore, when analyzing the relationship between IR and hypertension, most researchers have added common obesity indicators such as WC or BMI as potential confounders to the models. Our findings are generally in accordance with those of several studies in which the association between IR and hypertension disappeared after adjustment for obesity. For instance, in a prospective study with 8.9 years of follow-up, IR was positively associated with hypertension incidence among 1725 Iranian men, whereas this association was not significant when WC and BMI were included in the models [9]. Another cohort study [8] identified visceral obesity as a mediator of IR on increased hypertension risk, and increased visceral obesity, measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), explained 69.1% of the risk of incident hypertension associated with IR. A few reviews [14, 24, 25] also mentioned the role of obesity in the relationship between hypertension and IR. In addition, some studies have evaluated the relationship between IR and hypertension by sex stratification, as well as sex differences in these relationships suggesting that differences in body fat distribution affect this relationship [9, 26]. Another study found that IR is positively associated with a greater risk of incident hypertension among participants in overweight/obese BMI or high WC groups [27]. Therefore, general and central adiposity may have confounding or mediating effects on the association between IR and incident hypertension. However, other studies observed no modifying effects of obesity on this relationship. A recent meta-analysis of prospective studies provided evidence that IR is independently associated with subsequent risk of hypertension in the general population, which included original studies that considered at least one of the BMI and WC variables [5]. A 20-year follow-up longitudinal study [28] reported that BMI does not significantly modify the positive association between IR and the incidence of hypertension among Americans. Another prospective study consisting of 2814 Iranians also found that IR was significantly associated with the development of hypertension after considering BMI changes [29]. However, the above two prospective studies did not provide enough information to evaluate whether obesity indicators of WC and BF% mediated the association between IR and hypertension. Kaze et al. [27] examined the positive relationship between IR and incident hypertension; however, the researchers did not adjust for WC or BMI as confounders.

It is worth noting that BMI and WC are the two most common adjustment variables to represent obesity. In addition to these parameters being strongly correlated with IR, they are also closely associated with the risk of hypertension as confirmed by several longitudinal observational studies in different populations [30,31,32]. Recent cohort studies have demonstrated that BF% measured by BIA is independently associated with cardiovascular events [33], including hypertension [12]. Moreover, BF% is more strongly correlated with cardiovascular risk [33, 34] and hypertension [35] than with BMI or WC. Thus, whether BF% affects the relationship between IR and hypertension independent of BMI and WC needs to be confirmed. Our study found additive interactions between high HOMA-IR and obesity, defined as a high BF%, on hypertension. Interestingly, our study findings suggest that high truncal and leg BF% with high HOMA-IR has significant interactions with hypertension only in women, but not in men. The differences in the distribution of BF% between men and women might provide an explanation for this discrepancy; women had higher truncal BF% than men (36.65 vs. 28.21, P < 0.001), and leg BF% in women was higher than that in men (33.31 vs. 27.43, P < 0.001). A growing body of evidence supports that truncal adipose tissue has a significant impact on the development of IR and diabetes mellitus [36], and a study found that truncal fat-to-leg fat ratio is significantly associated with cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of BMI and WC [37]. Tillin et al. [38] also described that IR and truncal obesity account for the two-fold excess diabetes risk in Indian Asian and African Caribbean women, but not in men, in a cohort followed up for 20 years. The underlying explanation might be that truncal obesity causes an inflammatory state and leads to metabolic diseases such as hypertension and IR. However, the interactions of BF% with IR on hypertension risk have not been explored before as performed in the current study, perhaps because BF% measurements are time-consuming and expensive if using the gold standard approach of DXA. In addition, most studies tend to evaluate the relationship between total BF% and IR or metabolic disease, not considering it as a confounder to adjust or explore the interaction effects between IR and BF%. Our study may advance reasonable proposals to focus on both truncal BF% and IR in the development of hypertension. In addition to BMI, WC, and BF%, a body shape index (ABSI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) serve as valuable indicators of obesity. ABSI was proposed based on a person’s WC and adjusting for their height and weight [39]. Higher ABSI have been associated with increased risks of mortality [39, 40], and hypertension [41]. Our findings indicate that elevated ABSI is a risk factor for hypertension, with a stronger association observed in males compared to females (Supplementary Table 1). However, in our study, there was no significant association between WHtR and hypertension after adjusting for traditional confounders (Supplementary Table 2). Future research should consider analyzing WHtR trends as a marker of changing central adiposity.

Our study may provide additional insights into the association between different obesity indicators and IR on hypertension risk. To our knowledge, this is the first study to consider that BF% has a confounding effect on the relationship between IR and the risk of hypertension, and we found for the first time that BF% mediates this relationship, especially in women with high truncal and leg BF% and high IR. However, the present study has certain limitations. First, as it was cross-sectional, we cannot assert causality, and the results require a longitudinal cohort study for verification. Second, BF% was measured using BIA instead of the gold standard approach of DXA. This might have introduced some bias. Nevertheless, existing research has shown a strong correlation between BIA-derived BF% and DXA in the general adult population [42]. Similarly, BIA-estimated WC shows a high correlation with direct manual measurement [43].Overall, BIA estimation of body composition is more suitable for large epidemiological studies where it can facilitate rapid screening of body composition metrics. However, BIA measures are dependent on several factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, overweight/obesity conditions, and the environment. Therefore, BIA measurements should be based on specific BIA equations tailored for different populations in the studies [44]. Our BIA devices, purchased from South Korea, are suitable for use in Asia and have specific calibration equations for the Chinese population. Third, as this study was performed in a Chinese rural population, the participants were relatively old (approximately 45% of participants were 60 years or older), and 23% had abnormal glucose tolerance; therefore, the generalizability of the study results to other ethnicities might be questionable.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that BF% modifies the association between IR and increased risk of hypertension in women with high truncal and leg BF%, but not in men.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AP:

attributable proportion

BF%:

body fat percentage

BIA:

bioelectrical impedance analysis

BMI:

body mass index

CI:

confidence interval

CNC-NX:

China Northwest Natural Population Cohort, Ningxia Project

DBP:

diastolic blood pressure

DXA:

dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

FBG:

fasting blood glucose

HOMA-IR:

homeostasis model assessment index

IR:

insulin resistance

OR:

odds ratio

RERI:

relative excess risk

SBP:

systolic blood pressure

WC:

waist circumference

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in Hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. 2021;398:957–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of Hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:223–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang F, Han L, Hu D. Fasting insulin, insulin resistance and risk of Hypertension in the general population: a meta-analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;464:57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen X, Liu Y, Sun X, Yin Z, Li H, Deng K, et al. Comparison of body mass index, waist circumference, conicity index, and waist-to-height ratio for predicting incidence of Hypertension: the rural Chinese cohort study. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32:228–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landi F, Calvani R, Picca A, Tosato M, Martone AM, Ortolani E, et al. Body mass index is strongly associated with Hypertension: results from the longevity check-up 7 + study. Nutrients. 2018;10:1976.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmed B, Sultana R, Greene MW. Adipose tissue and insulin resistance in obese. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;137:111315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kotsis V, Stabouli S, Papakatsika S, Rizos Z, Parati G. Mechanisms of obesity-induced Hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2010;33:386–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Antonio-Villa NE, Bello-Chavolla OY, Vargas-Vázquez A, Mehta R, Fermín-Martínez CA, Martagón-Rosado AJ, et al. Increased visceral fat accumulation modifies the effect of insulin resistance on arterial stiffness and Hypertension risk. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31:506–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arshi B, Tohidi M, Derakhshan A, Asgari S, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Sex-specific relations between fasting insulin, insulin resistance and incident Hypertension: 8.9 years follow-up in a Middle-Eastern population. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:260–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sung KC, Lim S, Rosenson RS. Hyperinsulinemia and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance as predictors of Hypertension: a 5-year follow-up study of Korean sample. Am J Hypertens. 2011;24:1041–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li R, Tian Z, Wang Y, Liu X, Tu R, Wang Y, et al. The association of body fat percentage with Hypertension in a Chinese rural population: the Henan Rural Cohort Study. Front Public Health. 2020;8:70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SB, Cho AR, Kwon YJ, Jung DH. Body fat change and 8-year incidence of Hypertension: Korean genome and epidemiology study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:1849–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Park SK, Ryoo JH, Oh CM, Choi JM, Chung PW, Jung JY. Body fat percentage, obesity, and their relation to the incidental risk of Hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21:1496–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chateau-Degat ML, Poirie P. Insulin resistance, obesity and Hypertension: is the link waist circumference? Therapy. 2007;4:575–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben Ali S, Belfki-Benali H, Ahmed DB, Haddad N, Jmal A, Abdennebi M, et al. Postmenopausal Hypertension, abdominal obesity, apolipoprotein and insulin resistance. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2016;38:370–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kabootari M, Akbarpour S, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Sex specific impact of different obesity phenotypes on the risk of incident Hypertension: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2019;16:16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang T, Zhang H, Li S, Li Y, Liu Y, Fernandez C, et al. Impact of adiposity on incident Hypertension is modified by insulin resistance in adults: longitudinal bservation from the Bogalusa Heart Study. Hypertension. 2016;67:56–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang C, Liu X, Li J, Yan N, Dang Y, Chang Z, et al. Association of serum vitamin D and estradiol levels with metabolic syndrome in rural women of Northwest China: a cross-sectional study. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2022;20:182–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and β-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Physical status. The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1–452.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology. 1992;3:452–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang L, Xie J, Hu Y, Tian Y. Air pollution and risk of chronic obstructed pulmonary Disease: the modifying effect of genetic susceptibility and lifestyle. Biomedicine. 2022;79:103994.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu H, Ballantyne CM. Metabolic inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Circ Res. 2020;126:1549–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu FB, Stampfer MJ. Insulin resistance and Hypertension: the chicken-egg question revisited. Circulation. 2005;112:1678–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou MS, Wang A, Yu H. Link between insulin resistance and Hypertension: what is the evidence from evolutionary biology? Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kidambi S, Kotchen JM, Krishnaswami S, Grim CE, Kotchen TA. Hypertension, insulin resistance, and aldosterone: sex-specific relationships. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2009;11:130–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaze AD, Musani SK, Correa A, Bertoni AG, Golden SH, Abdalla M, et al. Insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, and blood pressure progression among blacks: the Jackson Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2021;39:2200–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Xun P, Liu K, Cao W, Sidney S, Williams OD, He K. Fasting insulin level is positively associated with incidence of Hypertension among American young adults: a 20-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1532–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Baghbani-Oskouei A, Tohidi M, Hasheminia M, Azizi F, Hadaegh F. Impact of 3-year changes in fasting insulin and insulin resistance indices on incident Hypertension: Tehran lipid and glucose study. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2019;16:76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jayedi A, Rashidy-Pour A, Khorshidi M, Shab-Bidar S. Body mass index, abdominal adiposity, weight gain and risk of developing Hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of more than 2.3 million participants. Obes Rev. 2018;19:654–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou W, Shi Y, Li YQ, Ping Z, Wang C, Liu X, et al. Body mass index, abdominal fatness, and Hypertension incidence: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32:321–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen Y, Liang X, Zheng S, Wang Y, Lu W. Association of body fat mass and fat distribution with the incidence of Hypertension in a population-based Chinese cohort: a 22-year follow-up. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:e007153.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Byambasukh O, Eisenga MF, Gansevoort RT, Bakker SJ, Corpeleijn E. Body fat estimates from bioelectrical impedance equations in cardiovascular risk assessment: the PREVEND cohort study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26:905–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Marques-Vidal P, Bochud M, Mooser V, Paccaud F, Waeber G, Vollenweider P. Obesity markers and estimated 10-year fatal cardiovascular risk in Switzerland. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19:462–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang J, Deng S, Chen Y, Liang S, Ma N, Xu Y, et al. Comparison of visceral and body fat indices and anthropometric measures in relation to untreated Hypertension by age and gender among Chinese. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:204–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Patel P, Abate N. Body fat distribution and insulin resistance. Nutrients. 2013;5:2019–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Shin JY. Truncal fat–to–leg fat ratio and carotid plaque score in patients with type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2022;71:1099–P.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tillin T, Hughes AD, Godsland IF, Whincup P, Forouhi NG, Welsh P, et al. Insulin resistance and truncal obesity as important determinants of the greater incidence of Diabetes in Indian asians and African caribbeans compared with europeans: the Southall and Brent REvisited (SABRE) cohort. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:383–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Krakauer NY, Krakauer JC. A new body shape index predicts mortality hazard independently of body mass index. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e39504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Christakoudi S, Tsilidis KK, Muller DC, Freisling H, Weiderpass E, Overvad K, et al. A body shape index (ABSI) achieves better mortality risk stratification than alternative indices of abdominal obesity: results from a large European cohort. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang X, Ye R, Sun L, Liu X, Wang S, et al. Relationship between novel anthropometric indices and the incidence of Hypertension in Chinese individuals: a prospective cohort study based on the CHNS from 1993 to 2015. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ramírez-Vélez R, Tordecilla-Sanders A, Correa-Bautista JE, González-Ruíz K, González-Jiménez E, Triana-Reina HR, et al. Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obese Colombian adults. Am J Hum Biol. 2018;30:e23071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tanaka S, Ando K, Kobayashi K, Seki T, Ishizuka S, Machino M, et al. Waist Circumference measured by Bioelectrical Impedance analysis is interchangeable with Manual Measurement: increased Waist circumference is Associated with Locomotive Syndrome Risk. Biomed Res Int. 2019. 5971030.

  44. Dehghan M, Merchant AT. Is bioelectrical impedance accurate for use in large epidemiological studies? Nutr J. 2008;7:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants and staff working for the China Northwest Natural Population Cohort, Ningxia Project (CNC-NX).

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81860603, 2020), Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (grant number 2020AAC03167, 2020), Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province (grant number 2021AAC03128, 2021), and a university-level project of Ningxia Medical University (grant number XT2019010, 2019). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design or conduct; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaoxia Li and Xiaoyu Chang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Xiaoxia Li, Yuanyuan Dang, Yixuan Xue, Qingan Wang, Wanlu Liu, Ting Yin & Yuhong Zhang

  2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Chronic Disease Control, School of Public Health of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Xiaoxia Li, Qingan Wang, Yi Zhao & Yuhong Zhang

  3. Editorial Board of Journal of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Xiaoyu Chang

  4. Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, 750004, China

    Yi Zhao

Authors
  1. Xiaoxia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoyu Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuanyuan Dang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yixuan Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wanlu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ting Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yi Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yuhong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YHZ and YZ conceived and designed the study. XXL, XYC, YYD, TY, YXX, WLL, and QNW contributed to data collection. YYD and TY conducted the experiments. XXL and XYC analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. YHZ and YZ revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The CNC-NX project was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Ningxia Medical University. All participants consented to participate in the study and provided written informed consent. All the procedure of the data collection was conducted according to the principles of Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Chang, X., Dang, Y. et al. Additive interactions between obesity and insulin resistance on hypertension in a Chinese rural population. BMC Public Health 23, 2519 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17454-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17454-1

Keywords

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

Contact us