Skip to main content
  • Study Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

The MEDITAGING study: protocol of a two-armed randomized controlled study to compare the effects of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program against a health promotion program in older migrants in Luxembourg



Migration is a phenomenon worldwide, with older migrants, particularly those with fewer socioeconomic resources, having an increased risk of developing adverse cognitive and health outcomes and social isolation. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to validate interventions that promote healthy aging in this population. Previous studies have shown a positive impact of mindfulness based-stress reduction (MBSR) on outcomes such as cognition and sleep. However, only a few studies verified its potential in older adults, especially with vulnerable populations such as migrants. This article presents the protocol of the MEDITAGING study, which is the first to investigate the MBSR effects in migrants aged ≥55 in comparison to a health promotion program.


MEDITAGING is a two-arm randomized, double-blinded, controlled study, which will include older Portuguese-speaking migrants (n = 90). Participants are randomized to the MBSR or a health promotion program. Both interventions are conducted in groups over a total of 8 weeks, incorporating weekly meetings, an additional 4-hour class, and extra at-home tasks. The health promotion program has the same structure as the MBSR but comprises different activities related to dementia prevention, healthy habits, cognitive stimulation, sleeping, nutrition, watercolor painting, and physical activity. The assessment of executive functioning, physiological stress measures, self-reported questionnaires, and qualitative interviews are conducted at baseline, after 8 weeks (post-intervention), and at a follow-up session (from one to 3 months thereafter). Analyzes will be conducted using a modified intention-to-treat approach (all participants with at least 3 days of participation in the group-sessions and one post-intervention observation).


This study will test effects of a mindfulness-based intervention against an active control condition in older adult migrants, which few studies have addressed.

Trial registration NCT05615337 (date of registration: 27 September 2022; date of record verification: 14 November 2022).

Peer Review reports


Older adults, making up a growing part of aging populations all over the world, have an increased risk of chronic metabolic disorders, cognitive impairment, and dementia [1,2,3]. Additionally, migration is a phenomenon worldwide, with older migrants, particularly those with less socioeconomic resources, having an increased risk of developing adverse cognitive and health outcomes and social isolation, which may impact the society and increase the need of care to promote health in this population [4, 5]. The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has an opportune scenario to study this phenomenon, since the large inflow of first-generation immigrants from the 1960s/70s, especially those from Portugal, are currently entering advanced ages. According to the Census data in 2020, more than 47% of the population in the country are foreign-born individuals, from which 34% are made up of Portuguese speakers, with more than 4% of the total population being composed of Portuguese migrants aged 65 and older [6, 7]. Most of these people have very low educational levels (87% of the Portuguese aged between 55 and 64 years old and 80% of those older than 65 have only primary or lower secondary education), occupy low levels of the social structure, and they have poor emotional support, with many facing language barriers as they are unable to speak one of the national languages (i.e., French, German, or Luxembourgish) [7, 8]. These circumstances have a considerable impact in their lives, including an increased risk of dementia [9, 10] and interventions to address this risk are needed for this population.

Mindfulness is the act of intentionally paying attention to the experiences of the present moment, acknowledging thoughts and feelings, and letting them come and go with stillness, without judgment or emotional attachment [11]. Mindfulness training teaches individuals to be attentive, patient, and open to accept positive and negative experiences [12]. This training focuses on sustained and selective attention, as well as cognitive flexibility, which is the ability to adapt to new situations [13, 14]. From a cognitive perspective, the most promising results from mindfulness interventions are found on executive functions such as attention and working memory [15,16,17,18,19,20]. As the executive functions are diminishing across aging [21] and are transversal to almost all daily activities, restoration or maintenance of these capabilities may amplify the benefits of mindfulness, including a generalization of mindfulness to other domains, as a far transfer effect [22, 23]. The mindfulness-based interventions have also shown considerable benefits on other outcomes such as emotion, depression, stress, anxiety, sleep, quality of life, and mindfulness-related measures [15, 17, 24,25,26,27]. However, in general, the mean age of participants in the studies is relatively low [28,29,30,31,32,33] and some evidence is mixed [34]. The feasibility of a mindfulness-based program has been demonstrated on low-income African American older adults and its effects on blood pressure [35]. The current article describes the study protocol to address the paucity of evidence on effects of mindfulness interventions for older and underserved populations especially with regard to cognitive outcomes.

Beyond effects on cognition, sleep, and mental health, testing possible pathways of an MBRS intervention is advised. Aging is associated with structural and functional loss, underlying the reduction of several cognitive skills, such as attention [36], which when associated with stress, may exacerbate age-related cognitive and physical impairment [37], especially in the most vulnerable populations. Stress may affect neuroendocrine functioning via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, causing an exaggerated physiological response and resulting in excessive cortisol production, which is suggested to lead to negative cellular and synaptic changes in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex [38]. It has also been linked to inflammatory activities, which may lead to other adverse health outcomes [39,40,41] as well as the immune system [42]. Thus, a more holistic intervention, focusing on both attention training and stress relief, such as the mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program, is a promising tool to counteract those age-related conditions [43].

Additionally, other factors appear to modulate mindfulness-related gains. For instance, it was reported that in women, mindfulness training may have a more substantial impact on emotion, i.e., a greater decrease in negative affectivity than men, as well as a more pronounced increase in their mindfulness skills and self-compassion [44]. The number of attended lessons and home practice is also a factor to consider [45]. Thus, it is important to examine which factors may moderate mindfulness training, as they can be used to tailor interventions to better respond to individual differences and needs.

The current article describes the protocol of the MEDITAGING study whose aim is to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate and compare the effects of the MBSR in Portuguese-speaking migrants in Luxembourg, immediately after and around two-months post-intervention, in comparison to a health promotion program as an active control condition. MEDITAGING is a monocentric, randomized, double-blinded (assessor and participants blind) controlled superiority clinical trial with two parallel arms (with a 1:1 ratio).


See the Supplementary Material for the Standard Protocol Items Recommendations for Intervention Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 checklist.

Study setting

The group sessions are conducted at the premises of Zitha, a middle-sized company providing geriatric and gerontological care and assistance to older people living in Luxembourg, and other collaborating institutions such as senior public services and recreation clubs of Luxembourg. Data is being collected with Portuguese-speaking migrants invited through these institutions and through wide dissemination in the local media.


Participants are 55 years older and over, community-dwelling, Portuguese-speaking immigrants, living in Luxembourg or frontier regions. According to our eligibility criteria (see Table 1), participants have no major neurological or psychiatric disorders or current unstable illness. Moreover, as we previously verified that Portuguese older adults often present symptoms of anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep disorders [46, 47], we opted for broader inclusion criteria to maximize ecological validity. Additionally, we believe that participants presenting these symptoms would most likely benefit from the interventions [48]. Therefore, we did not exclude participants with corresponding symptoms. The decision to use the age of participants starting at 55 was supported by the evidence that much of the cognitive decline observed in old adults already starts at middle age [49], so we expected that individuals from this age group could benefit from our interventions to preserve cognitive functioning. Additionally, we only included Portuguese-speaking participants as they represent the largest (more than a third) and most vulnerable group of immigrants in Luxembourg [7].

Table 1 Eligibility criteria

Another important aspect observed among older Portuguese immigrants is language barrier, as the Portuguese often is the only language, they are proficient in or comfortable to use. As a result, it can negatively influence their social relationships, feelings of belonging, and wellbeing [50]. Social participation in which individuals interact in their mother language can lead to an increase in social integration and has been shown to contribute to a healthier aging [50]. Therefore, the MEDITAGING offers the courses in Portuguese.

Regarding the scores on cognitive functioning, we exclude participants with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) below 22 because it is necessary to have a considerable level of insight to take advantage of the programs. Likewise, illiterate participants are excluded as reading and writing are indispensable to carry out the activities proposed in either one of the two groups.


Coordinated communication strategies include spreading information about the MEDITAGING study to the Portuguese-speaking population, Portuguese Associations, local clinics, senior clubs, churches, brochures, and mass media (i.e., Facebook, newspaper advertising, radio programs, interviews). Communication materials are being made available in two languages (Portuguese and French). We have sent a printed letter to the institutions related to Portuguese-speaking people, informing them about the launch of the study and we are promoting lectures and booths at public events. With this mix of communication channels, we hope to reach our recruitment aim of 90 participants.

In case potential participants are interested in joining the program, ACT schedules an individual meeting, in which they are screened for eligibility and the informed consent is signed. During the first meeting, baseline assessments are performed, including sociodemographic and health-related questionnaires, cognitive tests, and qualitative interview). Participants also provide saliva for cortisol analysis and have their heart rate variability recorded. If any risk is identified (e.g., possibility of mild cognitive impairment), participants are informed about how to access specialist care services. Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detailed description of the assessment timepoints. No financial compensation or inducements are provided to the subjects participating in this study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design and participant flow diagram. Note. MBSR Mindfulness based-stress-reduction, HPP Health promotion program

Table 2 Screening and assessment measures

Informed consent

Informed consent is requested from the participants before they participate. A model of informed consent form will be obtained from the authors upon request. Participants confirm that they were provided with oral and written information about their participation, the nature, objectives, methods, as well as anticipated benefits and potential risks of the study. Additionally, by checking some boxes in the paper form, they authorize the research team to record, analyze, and use their data for scientific purposes and dissemination.

Sample size estimation

No previous study has examined the MBSR cognitive effects on older migrant adults. However, a study with older adults reported a small MBSR effect size on attention [51]. Consequently, we assume a small effect (f = 0.14) and estimated the sample size using the G* Power – 3.1 statistical software [52] for repeated-measures ANOVA, considering within-between interaction (group x time interaction), with 80% of power and 5% of type I error probability. Taking an attrition rate of 5% reported in the mentioned study, we will need 90 participants, 45 in each arm.

Intervention procedures

At the end of the baseline session, participants are randomized to one of two conditions: MBSR or health promotion program. After the intervention, there are two assessments: one immediately after the last program session and another during a follow-up session, ranging from one up to three months thereafter. This 3-month interval for the follow-up session is due to the fact that many participants frequently commute between Portugal and Luxembourg, which lead us to have a more spread interval for the assessments.

Both interventions, the MBSR and the health promotion program, were matched in terms of duration, home practice, a half day intensive practice of four hours, and a psychoeducational component with group discussion. The sessions are weekly delivered in face-to-face groups of around nine people, having the duration of two and a half hours each one. Participants are asked to practice for around 40 minutes at home, on a daily basis. Participants from both groups receive printed manuals regarding the contents and activities performed. The sessions of both groups are led by the first author ACT, who is a psychologist qualified to apply the MBSR program by the UC San Diego Center for Mindfulness. ACT has vast experience and training in group intervention, community therapy, teaching, and background in Psychology of Aging. FR led the watercolor session of the health promotion program. The general structure of both programs is presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Overview of the activities performed in both groups: MBSR and health promotion program

Experimental condition – MBSR

The most used mindfulness-based training approach in Western societies is the MBSR [53, 54], which is the program we will apply in this study. It incorporates secular mindfulness meditation techniques into a structured program created to alleviate suffering through self-regulation mechanisms. We will follow the original program of Kabat-Zinn [11, 55], an eight-week group-based psychoeducational program with weekly meetings with a duration of 2.5 hours, a retreat, and at-home activities. Participants are trained to be mindful (i.e., to be attentive to the present moment and to their thoughts, feelings, and body sensations, being more able to identify automatic patterns and adopt more conscious and adaptive responses to the circumstances). Therefore, this training provides greater ability to monitor thoughts, noticing the wandering mind, and redirecting it to the object of interest, usually called anchor [56].

Participants practice acceptance and acknowledge whatever is present, including negative and unwanted experiences, feelings, and thoughts. They are also invited to be aware of the transitory and impersonality of the experiences of life. During the training, the importance of bringing mindfulness and the practices to life and to the daily routine is emphasized. Sessions usually start with formal mindfulness practices, which are followed by group discussion, review of home practices, and recommendation of new activities.

More specifically, the program techniques consist of guided body scan, hatha yoga, and different meditation techniques (e.g., sitting, eating, walking). Discussion about relevant topics related to the physiology of stress and strategies of coping with stress is also included as well as daily at-home practice six days a week, including daily informal practices (e.g., make one activity of daily life mindfully). For home practice, participants were provided with audios containing guidance of the recommended practice. Participants are asked to record their home practice indicating the activity performed and its duration. There is also a silent retreat towards the end of the program, during which meditation skills are addressed with different techniques. Participants have the opportunity for extended introspection during this period. The retreat of the MEDITAGING protocol have the duration of four hours since an all-day retreat could be too tiring for older participants. Modification in the protocol, especially in the retreat session to adapt to the necessity of participants, has also been executed in previous studies [57, 58], with a literature review suggesting that a reduction in the duration of the protocol does not reduce the effectiveness of the traditional intervention [57].

The health promotion program

The health promotion program is used as an active control condition, which is rarely applied in the studies in the field since most of them use a passive control condition (see [12, 16, 17]). The control group is important to monitor expectancy effects, such as the Hawthorne effect [59] and social interaction.

The health promotion program consists of a psychoeducation program focusing on the following topics: risk factors for dementia, healthy habits, sleep quality, nutrition, unhealthy behaviors, physical exercise, and cognitive stimulation. Multidomain interventions have been previously proved to be well accepted by participants and have an impact in lifestyle (e.g., physical activity, sleep quality, and alcohol use), as well as subjective well-being and cognition [60, 61]. Therefore, from an ethical point of view, participants from both programs benefit from participating in this study. Also, this kind of active control condition has been employed in previous mindfulness trials [62, 63].

The health promotion program follows the same structure of the MBSR program, but its sessions do not include mindfulness training. The discussions are followed by practical exercises and at-home activity. There is a four-hour watercolor workshop similar in length to the retreat held in the MBSR group. Handouts are provided with activities to be performed at home. We developed the activities of this group based on previous literature [9, 60, 62, 64, 65].

Criteria for discontinuing intervention

All participants have the option to withdraw from the study and ask their samples and/or data to be destroyed at any time without the need to give a reason. However, whenever possible, reasons for dropping out will be recorded. In case adverse effects are identified, they will be explored and may result in the intervention being discontinued for the participants.

Adherence and feasibility

A previous study has shown a dropout rate of 5% [51]. However, the dropout rate may be higher in the MEDITAGING project since 25.2% of the Portuguese immigrants plan to commute between Portugal and Luxembourg [66]. The adherence of home practice in a previous review has shown to be around 60% [67]. To increase adherence, weekly feedback will be requested from participants throughout the intervention, in order to detect and resolve any situation that needs attention.

Due to the under-researched target population of the MEDITAGING study, it has a secondary aim of investigating the operational feasibility of the MBSR for older migrants, as well as the financial, physical, and psychological feasibility of participating in the program. In particular, the following aspects will be evaluated: if participants both, those remaining in the study and those lost to follow-up, report [1] the need of any adjustment in the program [2]; any difficulties encountered (e.g., time restriction, physical limitation, anxiety, financial problems).

For the adherence and dropout rate analysis, the proportion of participants who completed the baseline assessment and went to the first group session and the number of participants that attended at least three sessions will be considered.

Outcome measures

As outcome variables, we will assess executive functioning as primary outcome, as well as general cognitive ability, sleep quality, perceived stress, depression, anxiety, mindfulness-trait, cortisol level, and heart rate variability (HRV) as secondary ones. Additional exploratory analyses will be done to verify if the effects are moderated by demographic factors, such as gender and educational level, as well as number of attended sessions, stress, depression, mindfulness trait, anxiety, cortisol level, and sleep quality. We anticipate that the MBSR group will present gains (post-intervention compared to baseline) in cognitive tasks and stress relief and these gains will be higher than in the control group (health promotion program). A summary of the outcome measures is provided in Table 4. We aimed to select brief measures to minimize participant fatigue.

Table 4 Summary of primary and secondary outcomes

Previous reviews have shown that mindfulness may improve executive attention (mental set shifting and inhibition), as well as working memory, but overall evidence remains limited [32, 56, 68]. One study has shown the recruitment of attentional control regions such as the prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in participants during meditation activities [69]. Additionally, older adults have shown to benefit of mindfulness in cognition, especially on attention regulation [70, 71]. Therefore, primary outcomes will be the executive functioning measures, namely the score on TMT, Stroop color word task, and letter-number sequencing from WAIS-III [72].

We will run exploratory secondary analyses including the following measures: the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Perceived Stress Scale (PPS), Mindfulness Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS), Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI), Geriatric Depression 5 Item Scale (GDS-5), the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, as well as cortisol levels and heart rate variability (HRV). Cortisol level was only assessed at baseline and during post-intervention assessment (not in follow-up session, as the financial resources are limited). For the self-reported measures, the total score for the scale and subscales will be used as outcomes.

A cortisol test measuring the diurnal cortisol cycle is done with saliva samples collected at the participants’ home following manufacturer’s instructions (Salivette®, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Saliva collection is self-administered before and upon completion of the intervention, at three time points: 1) upon waking up, 2) 30 minutes after waking up, and 3) at 8 hours after waking up. Sarstedt salivette® kits are delivered to participants at baseline and after the intervention. Participants receive explanations on how to collect the saliva, specifically, participants are told to remove the swab from the Salivette® and place it in the mouth for about 120 seconds. Then, they return the swab to the Salivette®, replace the stopper, and store the sample in the home fridge. Normally, up to 1 day after saliva collection, participants themselves bring the collected samples to the place of intervention and give them to ACT who brings the samples to the laboratory for processing, analysis, and storage. At the laboratory, salivettes are stored frozen for up to 7 days (the tests are done once a week). Samples are centrifuged at 1000 rpm and aliquots are analysed by ELISA (Demeditec Saliva Free Cortisol Kit – Demeditec DES6611, Demeditec Diagnostics GmbH, Kiel, Germany) following the user manual. The samples are diluted if the results are greater than 30 ng/ml.

Heart rate (HR) assessments are performed individually during rest at baseline, post-test, and follow-up sessions. Participants comfortably sit using a Polar H10 chest strap and are instructed to lean back in the chair, to relax, and avoid movement for 15 minutes. In the last 5 minutes, HR is recorded using the Elite HRV smartphone application (Elite HRV Inc., Asheville, NC, USA). Each HR measure is recorded at two different times on the same day.

Randomization and blindness

At the end of the baseline assessment, participants are randomized to the MBSR or the health promotion program intervention. The randomization list was generated through a website ( in blocks of 10 participants with a ratio of 1:1 to receive the MBSR or the health promotion program (i.e., five individuals randomly allocated to each group). The allocation list is masked from all study personnel. The condition of each participant is described in different excel sheets in a way that the researcher responsible for the randomization would only have access to the allocation of the next participant (allocation concealment). Assessors and participants are blinded to the conditions prior to randomization. During the intervention, although participants know which activity they are included in, they do not know which the experimental or control conditions are. If participants want to know about our hypotheses, they may be disclosed after the study is completed. To test participants’ blinding, they fill out a questionnaire of credibility and expectancy adapted from Devilly and Borkovec [73]. Due to the researchers’ availability, the intervention facilitator and the data analyst are not blinded for participants’ conditions since it is performed by the first author of this study (ACT).

Management of data collection

Training is provided for all assessors in order to guarantee the quality of the assessment and the safety of participants. Adverse effects of the interventions are assessed through the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), administered in five different sessions of the project, as well as by the interview performed during the post-intervention session. This allows us to identify any unwanted effects associated with the MBSR. Although the risks related to the participation in this study are minimal, ACT, JS, and AKL periodically review the adverse effects and make decisions when they are verified. Changes to the study protocol will be updated accordingly in ACT has the responsibility to conduct and monitor the necessary tasks to run the study. A monthly meeting is held to discuss the quality and development of the project, intercalated with specific meetings focusing on specific tasks and aims of the project.

Most of the information is collected on paper and will be stored in a database. All samples and data are pseudonymized. Only one researcher (ACT) and the neuropsychologist assessor are able to match the participants’ name with their data. Names are replaced by codes from which identification is impossible. No personally identifiable information is transferred to the laboratory that process and analyze the saliva samples. All data collected will be entered into an eCRF system (Redcap) hosted under control of the researchers (ACT and AKL) acting as the Data Controller. The database of the eCRF system is protected by the firewall and has secure online access for the investigators. Data quality is checked by a second person not responsible for data entry. No Data Monitoring Committee is designated to this study, which is justified given it is a low-risk intervention.

Statistical analyses

Regarding statistical analyses, data will be explored for missing and impossible values and descriptive statistics will be provided. The analyzes will be based on the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (i.e., participants that participated in at least three group-sessions and have at least one post-intervention assessment). We chose three sessions based on previous studies showing cognitive changes after three sessions of cognitive training [74]. A level of significance of less than 5% will be used in the analyses.

We will use mixed-effect regression models with maximum likelihood estimation to analyze change in cognitive scores as a function of the interaction group*time and participants will be treated as a random effect. P-value will be set at p < .05. Effect sizes (Hedges, g) will be calculated for each score [75,76,77]. Demographic factors, such as gender and educational level, the number of attended sessions, as well as the score differences in stress relief, depression, anxiety, mindfulness state, and sleep quality will be analyzed by running separate models for each factor.

Concerning the interview, it will be recorded in audio and transcribed in Portuguese by a member of the research team. The interview data will be analyzed according to Malterud’s principles of systematic text condensation and guidelines for qualitative research [78]. Content analysis can be conducted using the software package NVivo 12 [79].

Reporting and dissemination

Results of the MEDITAGING project will be published in scientific journals and conferences. All scientific contributors will be included as authors according to international authorship guidelines. Only aggregated data will be published. Furthermore, specific scientific talks open to the public are being organized, with the entities participating in the study, to present the main findings to the participants, as well as to give them strategies to promote the successful aging. We will also take advantage of the mass media (e.g., newspapers, Facebook, Twitter, websites) to share findings with the scientific community and the public.


The study protocol was developed to provide good quality interventions to promote active aging among vulnerable older immigrants, especially focusing on cognition, stress reduction, and social interaction. Luxembourg offers a suitable context to run the MEDITAGING study since many immigrants, especially Portuguese speakers, are nowadays older adults with less favorable social participation profiles [8]. Consequently, older migrants may be more vulnerable to physical and mental disorders, which may come with increased needs for health and social care.

The MEDITAGING study aims to compare the effects of two group-programs (MBSR and health promotion program) offered to Portuguese-speaking immigrants aged 55 or over, living in Luxembourg and frontier regions. Other secondary aims such as characterization of the cognitive functioning and emotional state of the participants are also planned. Regarding the interventions, the MBSR follows the traditional curriculum [55], while the health promotion program was made following the literature in the field [9, 60, 62, 64]. As we developed an innovative control condition, we address the ethical and methodological challenge of providing health promotion education to the control group as well, in contrast to earlier studies that used a passive control condition only (see [12, 16, 17, 65]). Due to the active control condition [15,16,17,18], we believe that both intervention groups will benefit from the interventions. Nonetheless, due to the nature of the intervention condition, we hypothesize that the MBSR group will present more gains in executive functioning in line with the intention of the program [11]. Additionally, we expect that the MBSR group will present gains in stress relief, which will also be reflected in lower cortisol levels [80] and higher heart rate variability [81]. These surrogate measures are important to complement the neuropsychological assessment and questionnaires, supporting evidence for the efficacy of the interventions [82].

Furthermore, there is a paucity of evidence regarding mindfulness training effects in older adults, especially with vulnerable populations (see [83] for a recent review). This lack of studies was demonstrated in a review suggesting that, in high-income countries, there are few programs promoting health in disadvantaged populations [84].

Regarding the limitations, interventions with other migrant groups may be needed to understand if the results of MEDITAGING can be generalized. Second, written assignments that are part of the MBSR may be less effective in the addressed population, as most of the participants have low levels of education and do not feel comfortable writing. It would be important that future studies use other modalities of registration, such as recording, to register their answers and practices. Third, Some of the participants are excluded due to illiteracy, as the MBSR and health promotion materials require reading skills. Inclusion of illiterate people in future studies is important to test effects in this even more vulnerable group. Fourth, the study may lack power since we have based our sample size calculation in a study with higher educated population and effects may be smaller in our target population [26]. No other study with a similar population and endpoints was published by the time we planned this project. Fifth, the high level of sickness days due to the pandemic and the frequent travels to the origin countries of the participants may lead to a high dropout rate. Sixth, differences in outcomes between intervention and control group may be rather small, since participants in the control condition are receiving an intervention to promote a healthier lifestyle, which is supposed to improve lifestyle, well-being, cognition, and protect against dementia [60, 61, 85]. Finally, it would also be important to follow-up participants for a longer period of time to evaluate if the effects are maintained in the long-term.


We believe that MEDITAGING is an important initiative contributing to the evidence base on non-pharmacological interventions aimed at promoting healthy aging, especially among vulnerable populations such as migrants. Feedback from national partners suggests that initiatives like the MEDITAGING project fill a need related to immigration. The diversity and singularity of older migrants needs to be addressed in interventions like this, as well as incorporated in public health policies [7, 8, 86].

Availability of data and materials

Data supporting our conclusions may be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



mindfulness based-stress reduction


Health promotion program


  1. Burch JB, Augustine AD, Frieden LA, Hadley E, Howcroft TK, Johnson R, et al. Advances in geroscience: Impact on healthspan and chronic disease. J Gerontol-Series A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69

  2. Chaves AS, Santos AM dos, Alves MTSS de B e, Salgado Filho N. Associação entre declínio cognitivo e qualidade de vida de idosos hipertensos. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia. 2015 18(3):545–56

  3. Pusswald G, Tropper E, Kryspin-Exner I, Moser D, Klug S, Auff E, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment and its relation to activities of daily living. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;

  4. Selten JP, Termorshuizen F, van Sonsbeek M, Bogers J, Schmand B. Migration and dementia: a meta-analysis of epidemiological studies in Europe. Psychol Med. 2021;51(11):1838–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maleku A, España M, Jarrott S, Karandikar S, Parekh R. We are aging too! Exploring the social impact of late-life migration among older immigrants in the United States. J Immigr Refug Stud. 2022;20(3):365–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. StatecLuxembourg in figures. 2020Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zahlen P. Elderly migrants in Luxembourg. In: Ageing in Contexts of Migration; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ramos AC, Karl U. Social relations, Long-Term Care and Well-Being of Older Migrants in Luxembourg, vol. 29; 2016. p. 115–23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the lancet commission. Lancet. 2020;

  10. Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;

  11. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living:Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. The Nurse Pract. 1992;

  12. Baer RA. Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review 10. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract. 2003;

  13. Bishop SR, Lau M, Shapiro S, Carlson L, Anderson ND, Carmody J, et al. Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2004;11(3):230–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore A, Malinowski P. Meditation, mindfulness and cognitive flexibility. Conscious Cogn. 2009;18(1)

  15. Fountain-Zaragoza S, Prakash RS. Mindfulness training for healthy aging: impact on attention, well-being, and inflammation. Front aging Neurosci. 2017;

  16. Gard T, Hölzel BK, Lazar SW. The potential effects of meditation on age-related cognitive decline: A systematic review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;

  17. Gill LN, Renault R, Campbell E, Rainville P, Khoury B. Mindfulness induction and cognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Conscious Cogn. 2020;

  18. Pandya SP. Meditation to improve the quality of life of community-dwelling ever-single older adults: A multi-city five-year follow-up experiment. J Relig Spiritual Aging. 2020;

  19. Whitfield T, Barnhofer T, Acabchuk R, Cohen A, Lee M, Schlosser M, et al. The effect of mindfulness-based programs on cognitive function in adults: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2021;

  20. Mirabito G, Verhaeghen P. The effects of mindfulness interventions on older adults’ cognition: A Meta-analysis. J Gerontol: Series B. 2023;78(3):394–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelis MC, Wang Y, Holland T, Agarwal P, Weintraub S, Morris MC. Age and cognitive decline in the UK biobank. PLoS One. 2019;14(3)

  22. Jha AP, Denkova E, Zanesco AP, Witkin JE, Rooks J, Rogers SL. Does mindfulness training help working memory ‘work’ better? Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;28

  23. Teixeira-Santos AC, Moreira CS, Magalhães R, Magalhães C, Pereira DR, Leite J, et al. Reviewing working memory training gains in healthy older adults: A meta-analytic review of transfer for cognitive outcomes. 2019;103:163–77. Available from:

  24. Fox KCR, Nijeboer S, Dixon ML, Floman JL, Ellamil M, Rumak SP, et al. Is meditation associated with altered brain structure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of morphometric neuroimaging in meditation practitioners. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;

  25. Hölzel BK, Carmody J, Vangel M, Congleton C, Yerramsetti SM, Gard T, et al. Mindfulness practice leads to increases in regional brain gray matter density. Psychiatry Res Neuroimag. 2011;

  26. Moynihan JA, Chapman BP, Klorman R, Krasner MS, Duberstein PR, Brown KW, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults: effects on executive function, frontal alpha asymmetry and immune function. Neuropsychobiol. 2013;

  27. O’Leary K, O’Neill S, Dockray S. A systematic review of the effects of mindfulness interventions on cortisol 21, Journal of Health Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016 2108–2121. Available from:

  28. Sharma M, Rush SE. Mindfulness-based stress reduction as a stress management intervention for healthy individuals. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2014;19(4):271–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khoury B, Sharma M, Rush SE, Fournier C. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(6):519–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cásedas L, Pirruccio V, Vadillo MA, Lupiáñez J. Does mindfulness meditation training enhance executive control? A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in adults. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020;11(2):411–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Im S, Stavas J, Lee J, Mir Z, Hazlett-Stevens H, Caplovitz G. Does mindfulness-based intervention improve cognitive function?: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;84:101972.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lao SA, Kissane D, Meadows G. Cognitive effects of MBSR/MBCT: A systematic review of neuropsychological outcomes. Conscious Cogn. 2016;45:109–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Winbush NY, Gross CR, Kreitzer MJ. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on sleep disturbance: A systematic review. Explore. 2007;3(6):585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lenze EJ, Voegtle M, Miller JP, Ances BM, Balota DA, Barch D, et al. Effects of mindfulness training and exercise on cognitive function in older adults. JAMA. 2022;328(22):2218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Palta P, Page G, Piferi RL, Gill JM, Hayat MJ, Connolly AB, et al. Evaluation of a mindfulness-based intervention program to decrease blood pressure in low-income African-American older adults. J Urban Health. 2012;

  36. Salthouse TA. Trajectories of Normal cognitive aging. Psychol Aging. 2018;34(1):17–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Hara R, Beaudreau SA, Luzon A, Hah M, Hubbard JT, Sommer B. Stress, resilience, and the aging brain. In: Successful cognitive and emotional aging; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ouanes S, Popp J. High cortisol and the risk of dementia and alzheimer’s disease: A review of the literature. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11

  39. Graham JE, Christian LM, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stress, age, and immune function: toward a lifespan approach. J Behav Med. 2006;29

  40. McEwen BS. Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;583

  41. McEwen BS, Gianaros PJ. Stress- and Allostasis-induced brain plasticity. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62(1):431–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Prenderville JA, Kennedy PJ, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. Adding fuel to the fire: the impact of stress on the ageing brain. Trends Neurosci. 2015;38

  43. Felsted KF. Mindfulness, stress, and aging. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020;36

  44. Rojiani R, Santoyo JF, Rahrig H, Roth HD, Britton WB. Women benefit more than men in response to college-based meditation training. Front Psychol. 2017;

  45. Wong WP, Hassed C, Chambers R, Coles J. The Effects of Mindfulness on Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Study. 2016;8(June):1–15.

  46. Teixeira-Santos ACAC, Pinal D, Pereira DRDR, Leite J, Carvalho S, Sampaio A. Probing the relationship between late endogenous ERP components with fluid intelligence in healthy older adults. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):11167.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Teixeira-Santos AC, Moreira CS, Pereira DR, Pinal D, Fregni F, Leite J, et al. Working memory training coupled with transcranial direct current stimulation in older adults: A randomized controlled experiment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;12:14.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vøllestad J, Sivertsen B, Nielsen GH. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for patients with anxiety disorders: evaluation in a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2011;49(4)

  49. Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour MM, Elbaz A, Berr C, Ebmeier KP, et al. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: Results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344(7840)

  50. Pot A, Keijzer M, de Bot K. The language barrier in migrant aging. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 2020;23(9):1139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gallegos AM, Hoerger M, Talbot NL, Krasner MS, Knight JM, Moynihan JA, et al. Toward identifying the effects of the specific components of mindfulness-based stress reduction on biologic and emotional outcomes among older adults. J Altern Complement Med. 2013;19(10)

  52. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kabat-Zinn J. An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1982;4(1):33–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kabat-Zinn J, Lipworth L, Burney R, Sellers W. Four-year follow-up of a meditation-based program for the self-regulation of chronic pain: treatment outcomes and compliance. Clin J Pain. 1986;

  55. Santorelli S, Meleo-Meyer F, Koerbel L, Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR): authorized curriculum guide. In: Center for Mindfulness in Medicine, Health Care & Society; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gallant SN. Mindfulness meditation practice and executive functioning: breaking down the benefit. Conscious Cogn. 2016;40

  57. Carmody J, Baer RA. How long does a mindfulness-based stress reduction program need to be? A review of class contact hours and effect sizes for psychological distress. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65

  58. Pereira DR, Silva ER, Carvalho-Maia C, Monteiro-Reis S, Lourenço C, Calisto R, et al. The modulatory role of internet-supported mindfulness-based cognitive therapy on extracellular vesicles and psychological distress in people who have had cancer: a protocol for a two-armed randomized controlled study. Trials. 2022;23(1)

  59. Wickstrom G, Bendix T. The “Hawthorne effect” - what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000;26:363–7.

  60. Mace RA, Greenberg J, Stauder M, Reynolds G, Vranceanu AM. My healthy brain: a multimodal lifestyle program to promote brain health. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26(5)

  61. Ngandu T, Lehtisalo J, Solomon A, Levälahti E, Ahtiluoto S, Antikainen R, et al. A 2 year multidomain intervention of diet, exercise, cognitive training, and vascular risk monitoring versus control to prevent cognitive decline in at-risk elderly people (FINGER): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9984)

  62. MacCoon DG, Imel ZE, Rosenkranz MA, Sheftel JG, Weng HY, Sullivan JC, et al. The validation of an active control intervention for mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR). Behav Res Ther. 2012;50(1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Marchant NL, Barnhofer T, Klimecki OM, Poisnel G, Lutz A, Arenaza-Urquijo E, et al. The SCD-well randomized controlled trial: effects of a mindfulness-based intervention versus health education on mental health in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD). In: Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions; 2018. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lorig Kate D, Laurent Diana MPH, Gonzalez Virgina MPH, Sobel MPH, David MD, Minor PD, et al. Living a healthy life with chronic conditions: self-management skills for heart disease Arthritis Diabetes, Depression, Asthma, Bronchitis, Emphysema and Other Physical and Mental Health Conditions. Living a Healthy Life with Chronic Conditions; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Johnson D. A good night’s sleep: three strategies to rest, relax and restore energy. J Interprof Educ Pract. 2023;30:100591.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Albert I, Coimbra SB, Ferring D. Social inquiry into well-being future plans and the regulation of well-being of older Portuguese immigrants in Luxembourg. Soc Inq Well Being. 2016;

  67. Parsons CE, Crane C, Parsons LJ, Fjorback LO, Kuyken W. Home practice in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of participants’ mindfulness practice and its association with outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2017:95.

  68. Chiesa A, Serretti A. Mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain: A systematic review of the evidence. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17

  69. Tang YY, Hölzel BK, Posner MI. The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;

  70. Chételat G, Lutz A, Klimecki O, Frison E, Asselineau J, Schlosser M, et al. Effect of an 18-month meditation training on regional brain volume and perfusion in older adults. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(11):1165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Oken BS, Fonareva I, Haas M, Wahbeh H, Lane JB, Zajdel D, et al. Pilot controlled trial of mindfulness meditation and education for dementia caregivers. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16(10)

  72. Wechsler D. WAIS-III: Escala de inteligência de Wechsler para adultos-Terceira edição. Manual técnico. [WAIS-III: Wechsler adult intelligence scale - 3rd edition. Technical manual]. Lisboa: Cegog-Tea; 2008.

  73. Devilly GJ, Borkovec TD. Psychometric properties of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2000;31(2):73–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Borella E, Carretti B, Riboldi F, de Beni R. Working memory training in older adults: evidence of transfer and maintenance effects. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(4):767–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science. In: Statistical Power Anaylsis for the Behavioral Sciences, vol. 3. 2nd ed; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hedges L, v. An unbiased correction for sampling error in validity generalization studies. J Appl Psychol. 1989;74(3):469–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Morris SB. Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11(2):364–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805. Available from:

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software 12 Pro.; 1999.

  80. Wetherell JL, Hershey T, Hickman S, Tate SR, Dixon D, Bower ES, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for older adults with stress disorders and neurocognitive difficulties: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017;78(7):e734–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Nijjar PS, Puppala VK, Dickinson O, Duval S, Duprez D, Kreitzer MJ, et al. Modulation of the autonomic nervous system assessed through heart rate variability by a mindfulness based stress reduction program. Int J Cardiol. 2014;177(2)

  82. Belleville S, Bherer L. Biomarkers of cognitive training effects in aging. Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep. 2012;

  83. Mirabito G, Verhaeghen P. The effects of mindfulness interventions on older adults’ cognition: A Meta-analysis. J Gerontol: Series B. 2022;

  84. Shahidi F, Ramraj C, Sod-Erdene O, Hildebrand V, Siddiqi A. The impact of social assistance programs on population health: A systematic review of research in high-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1)

  85. Fratiglioni L, Paillard-Borg S, Winblad B. An active and socially integrated lifestyle in late life might protect against dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3

  86. White P. Migrant populations approaching old age: prospects in Europe. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2006;32(8)

  87. World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Vol. 310, JAMA. 2013.

Download references


We would like to acknowledge the Ville de Differdange / Senior Plus, Ville de Esch-sur-Alzette / Escher BiBSS, Portuguese Catholic Mission, the Club Senior Prënzebierg, and the Senior Mosaïque Club for supporting the recruitment of participants.


This work is supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) - Project Reference 15240063. AS-F is supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and the Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education, through the national funds, within the scope of the Transitory Disposition of the Decree No. 57/2016, 29th of August, amended by Law No. 57/2017 of 19 July and her work is conducted at the Psychology Research Centre (CIPsi), School of Psychology, University of Minho, supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the Portuguese State Budget (Ref.: UIDB/PSI/01662/2020). The study funder has no role in any stage of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ACT conceived the idea of studying the effect of mindfulness on older adults’ immigrants and is responsible for the project administration, data management and analysis, and preparation of the initial version of the manuscript. ACT, AKL, and J-PS contributed to the conceptualization, design, and supervision of the study. ACT, CF, J-PS, and AKL are responsible for funding acquisition, provision of study materials, and recruitment of participants. ACT and LG worked on the MBSR and health promotion program protocol and in the qualitative assessments. FR and ACT are responsible for the watercolor retreat. ACT, FR, and DRP are involved in data collection (conducting interviews and neuropsychological assessments), with ACT also leading the interventions. ACT, AKL, and AS-F planned the saliva collection and the cortisol analysis. ACT and J-PS are responsible for the heart rate variability analysis. ACT and DRP worked on the literature review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana C. Teixeira-Santos.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

MEDITAGING was approved by the Ethics Review Panel of the University of Luxembourg (ERP 21–042 MEDITAGING), the National Research Ethics Committee (CNER - 0422-89), and the Luxembourg Ministry of Health. Informed consent is requested from the participants before they participate. A model of informed consent form can be obtained from the authors upon request. The guidelines outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki [87] will be followed. All data will be handled in compliance with the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 and Luxembourg Law on the Protection of Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teixeira-Santos, A.C., Gomes, L., Pereira, D.R. et al. The MEDITAGING study: protocol of a two-armed randomized controlled study to compare the effects of the mindfulness-based stress reduction program against a health promotion program in older migrants in Luxembourg. BMC Public Health 23, 2470 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: